display are subject to collision e g overlap on the interactive map if an affirmative determination is made then method 620 may be configured to further identify at block 632 priority levels of conflicting venue representations and display at block 634 venue representations with higher priority levels to determine priority levels associated with venues stored venues previously identified by an end user the recommendation search engine or a combination thereof previously described in conjunction with method 300 of fig3 a may be employed by method 620 for example the recommendation search engine may retrieve rating information associated with venues to assign priority levels rating information may be based on popularity of a venue as determined by independent venue rating sources ratings provided by an end user community or a combination thereof alternatively priority levels associated with venues may be determined based on sponsorships relating to the venues additionally priority may be given to venues that have a high u201c hotness u201d value as previously described in conjunction with method 300 of fig3 a fig6 c is a screen shot 640 illustrating a zoomed in view of an area of the interactive map having a plurality of venue representations 642 comprising a first venue logo 642 a a second venue logo 642 b a third venue logo 642 c and a fourth venue logo 642 d displayed on a city block fig6 d is a screen shot 660 illustrating a zoomed out view of the same area of the interactive map illustrated in screen shot 640 of fig6 c as can be seen focusing on the same city block in screen shot 660 only first venue logo 642 a and second venue logo.