Important to note that it’s the neighbourhood which’s labelled as “low-income" and the…
Important to note that it’s the neighbourhood which’s labelled as “low-income" and the neighbourhood doesn’t necessarily say anything about the people living in it at any point in time.

The label could’ve been given to said neighbourhood when people who earned “low incomes" indeed lived in it.

(By whose standards though? And whoever said we must accept someone else’s standards as our own?)

However, it’s crucial to remember the possibility of change in any given person’s life situation and financial circumstances at any point in time.

Could be anyone, everyone or no one in said “low-income” neighbourhood started earning a “high income" and they just didn’t bother to show it off for others.

They didn’t bother flaunting their changed-for-the-better-financial-circumstances because they stopped being affected by the ill or unsubstantiatedly dumb opinions of others.

Could be, no?

P.S. Loving the article BTW. Thank you for writing it, dear writer (I can’t recall your name at the moment, but I’m enjoying reading and engaging w/ your writing a lot. Thank you!).
['Amina Rashid']
['Labels', 'Responses', 'Discrimination']