《睡虎地秦墓竹简·其于部分·法律答问》
诬告他人盗窃值二十钱的东西，尚未判罪，本人又另犯盗窃罪，赃值一百钱，然后被察觉，应将两项赃值合并论处，还是判处实际盗窃的罪，再按诬告他人论处？
誣人直廿，未斷，有有它，直百，乃後覺，當并臧以論，且行真罪、有以誣人論？
If someone falsely accuses another of stealing something worth twenty coins, and before the accused is convicted, the accuser himself commits another theft of goods worth one hundred coins, which is then discovered, should the two thefts be combined and punished together, or should the accuser be punished for the actual theft and then separately for the false accusation?
<s>[INST] 用英语解释这段文言文的意思: 誣人直廿，未斷，有有它，直百，乃後覺，當并臧以論，且行真罪、有以誣人論？ [/INST] If someone falsely accuses another of stealing something worth twenty coins, and before the accused is convicted, the accuser himself commits another theft of goods worth one hundred coins, which is then discovered, should the two thefts be combined and punished together, or should the accuser be punished for the actual theft and then separately for the false accusation?</s>
用英语解释这段文言文的意思: 誣人直廿，未斷，有有它，直百，乃後覺，當并臧以論，且行真罪、有以誣人論？
user
If someone falsely accuses another of stealing something worth twenty coins, and before the accused is convicted, the accuser himself commits another theft of goods worth one hundred coins, which is then discovered, should the two thefts be combined and punished together, or should the accuser be punished for the actual theft and then separately for the false accusation?
assistant