《南史·列传·卷四十八》
引用他们不明了不符合的例子说他们是不懂，为什么独独抹杀他们的一些符合以及明了、可以证明他们懂得的事例呢？
引其不了不合爲闇，何独诬其一合一了之明乎？
To quote their unclear and mismatched examples to say that they do not understand, why only obliterate some of their correct and clear examples which can prove that they understand?
<s>[INST] First, translate the Classical Chinese text into modern Chinese and then into English. Classical Chinese: 引其不了不合爲闇，何独诬其一合一了之明乎？ [/INST] 引用他们不明了不符合的例子说他们是不懂，为什么独独抹杀他们的一些符合以及明了、可以证明他们懂得的事例呢？ Then, To quote their unclear and mismatched examples to say that they do not understand, why only obliterate some of their correct and clear examples which can prove that they understand?</s>
First, translate the Classical Chinese text into modern Chinese and then into English. Classical Chinese: 引其不了不合爲闇，何独诬其一合一了之明乎？
user
引用他们不明了不符合的例子说他们是不懂，为什么独独抹杀他们的一些符合以及明了、可以证明他们懂得的事例呢？ Then, To quote their unclear and mismatched examples to say that they do not understand, why only obliterate some of their correct and clear examples which can prove that they understand?
assistant