《徐霞客游记·滇游日记二十七》
今天皇帝手写的文章已不存在，但诗碑还是当时所刻的。李中黔的《大理郡志》认为帝王的诗不能与文献一同辑录，竟然不收录它。不过他的文献类中也有皇帝写的文章，为何唯独诗就不能一同辑录呢？
今宸翰原意指帝王宫殿，后作为帝王代称，这里代指朱元璋已不存，而诗碑犹当时所镌者。李中谿《大理郡志》，以奎章指皇帝手笔不可与文献同辑，竟不之录。然其文献门中亦有御制文，何独诗而不可同辑耶？
The emperor's handwritten poems have not been handed down to the present day, but the stele of poetry is still the original one from that time. Li Zhongqian’s “Dali County Gazette” holds that the emperor's poems cannot be compiled together with documents, and so unsurprisingly does not include it. However, in his book on documents there are also works by the emperor, so why is it that only his poems are not compiled together with the other documents?
<s>[INST] 请给出以下文言文的现代汉语和英语翻译: 今宸翰原意指帝王宫殿，后作为帝王代称，这里代指朱元璋已不存，而诗碑犹当时所镌者。李中谿《大理郡志》，以奎章指皇帝手笔不可与文献同辑，竟不之录。然其文献门中亦有御制文，何独诗而不可同辑耶？ [/INST] 现代汉语: 今天皇帝手写的文章已不存在，但诗碑还是当时所刻的。李中黔的《大理郡志》认为帝王的诗不能与文献一同辑录，竟然不收录它。不过他的文献类中也有皇帝写的文章，为何唯独诗就不能一同辑录呢？ 英语: The emperor's handwritten poems have not been handed down to the present day, but the stele of poetry is still the original one from that time. Li Zhongqian’s “Dali County Gazette” holds that the emperor's poems cannot be compiled together with documents, and so unsurprisingly does not include it. However, in his book on documents there are also works by the emperor, so why is it that only his poems are not compiled together with the other documents?</s>
请给出以下文言文的现代汉语和英语翻译: 今宸翰原意指帝王宫殿，后作为帝王代称，这里代指朱元璋已不存，而诗碑犹当时所镌者。李中谿《大理郡志》，以奎章指皇帝手笔不可与文献同辑，竟不之录。然其文献门中亦有御制文，何独诗而不可同辑耶？
user
现代汉语: 今天皇帝手写的文章已不存在，但诗碑还是当时所刻的。李中黔的《大理郡志》认为帝王的诗不能与文献一同辑录，竟然不收录它。不过他的文献类中也有皇帝写的文章，为何唯独诗就不能一同辑录呢？ 英语: The emperor's handwritten poems have not been handed down to the present day, but the stele of poetry is still the original one from that time. Li Zhongqian’s “Dali County Gazette” holds that the emperor's poems cannot be compiled together with documents, and so unsurprisingly does not include it. However, in his book on documents there are also works by the emperor, so why is it that only his poems are not compiled together with the other documents?
assistant