《文心雕龙·杂文》
此外如陈思的《问客》，文辞不错而内容疏略；庾骃的《客咨》，内容较强而文辞太弱。
至于陈思《客问》，辞高而理疏；庾敳《客咨》，意荣而文悴。
Other works, such as Chen Si's “Wen Ke,” had good diction but weak content, while Yu Zuo's “Ke Zi” had strong content but weak diction.
<s>[INST] Analyze the following Classical Chinese passage and provide both a modern Chinese and an English translation: 至于陈思《客问》，辞高而理疏；庾敳《客咨》，意荣而文悴。 [/INST] Modern Chinese Interpretation: 此外如陈思的《问客》，文辞不错而内容疏略；庾骃的《客咨》，内容较强而文辞太弱。 English Translation: Other works, such as Chen Si's “Wen Ke,” had good diction but weak content, while Yu Zuo's “Ke Zi” had strong content but weak diction.</s>
Analyze the following Classical Chinese passage and provide both a modern Chinese and an English translation: 至于陈思《客问》，辞高而理疏；庾敳《客咨》，意荣而文悴。
user
Modern Chinese Interpretation: 此外如陈思的《问客》，文辞不错而内容疏略；庾骃的《客咨》，内容较强而文辞太弱。 English Translation: Other works, such as Chen Si's “Wen Ke,” had good diction but weak content, while Yu Zuo's “Ke Zi” had strong content but weak diction.
assistant