《宋史·列传·卷六十九》
而且增减诏令有一定的章法，表则之地，难道我们要破坏它吗？ 于是不敢去掉 权 字。
且增减制书有法，表则之地，先欲乱之邪？ 遂不敢去。
And there are certain rules for adding or deleting imperial edicts. Is it really the case that we should destroy the well-established rule? Therefore, he dared not remove the character "power."
<s>[INST] Take each pair of old and new sentences and unite them into a single translation that captures the core meaning: Archaic: 且增减制书有法，表则之地，先欲乱之邪？ 遂不敢去。 Updated: 而且增减诏令有一定的章法，表则之地，难道我们要破坏它吗？ 于是不敢去掉 权 字。 [/INST] And there are certain rules for adding or deleting imperial edicts. Is it really the case that we should destroy the well-established rule? Therefore, he dared not remove the character "power."</s>
Take each pair of old and new sentences and unite them into a single translation that captures the core meaning: Archaic: 且增减制书有法，表则之地，先欲乱之邪？ 遂不敢去。 Updated: 而且增减诏令有一定的章法，表则之地，难道我们要破坏它吗？ 于是不敢去掉 权 字。
user
And there are certain rules for adding or deleting imperial edicts. Is it really the case that we should destroy the well-established rule? Therefore, he dared not remove the character "power."
assistant