《资治通鉴·晋纪·晋纪二十八》
可是浑氏虽然有罪于前朝，但对待她这样的皇后的礼法已有成规，慕容垂因为私恨而废黜了她，又立哥哥的妻妾中没有儿子的人作为皇太后，这些全都违背了礼法。
可足浑氏虽有罪于前朝，然小君之礼成矣；垂以私憾废之，又立兄妾之无子者，皆非礼也。
Even though the Hun family had committed crimes against the previous imperial court, there were set etiquette for treating the empress, and Murong Chui had deposed her out of personal animosity, and again appointed as empress dowager a wife or concubine of his elder brother who had no son, which was a violation of ritual principles.
<s>[INST] I need this in both modern chinese phrasing and English - could you help? 可足浑氏虽有罪于前朝，然小君之礼成矣；垂以私憾废之，又立兄妾之无子者，皆非礼也。 [/INST] Contemporary: 可是浑氏虽然有罪于前朝，但对待她这样的皇后的礼法已有成规，慕容垂因为私恨而废黜了她，又立哥哥的妻妾中没有儿子的人作为皇太后，这些全都违背了礼法。 English version: Even though the Hun family had committed crimes against the previous imperial court, there were set etiquette for treating the empress, and Murong Chui had deposed her out of personal animosity, and again appointed as empress dowager a wife or concubine of his elder brother who had no son, which was a violation of ritual principles.</s>
I need this in both modern chinese phrasing and English - could you help? 可足浑氏虽有罪于前朝，然小君之礼成矣；垂以私憾废之，又立兄妾之无子者，皆非礼也。
user
Contemporary: 可是浑氏虽然有罪于前朝，但对待她这样的皇后的礼法已有成规，慕容垂因为私恨而废黜了她，又立哥哥的妻妾中没有儿子的人作为皇太后，这些全都违背了礼法。 English version: Even though the Hun family had committed crimes against the previous imperial court, there were set etiquette for treating the empress, and Murong Chui had deposed her out of personal animosity, and again appointed as empress dowager a wife or concubine of his elder brother who had no son, which was a violation of ritual principles.
assistant