《明史·列传·卷一百七十一》
著《春秋本意》十二篇，不采用《左传》、《公羊传》、《谷梁传》的事实，认为 ：是非必待有三传而后才明白，那么《春秋》就可以成为不必要的书了。 
著《春秋本意》十二篇，不采三传事实，言： 是非必待三传而后明，是《春秋》为弃书矣。 
He wrote Twelve Chapters on the Spring and Autumn Annals, and rejected the facts in the Zuo Commentary, the Gongyang Commentary, and the Guliang Commentary. He said: If right and wrong must rely on the Three Commentaries to understand them, then the Spring and Autumn Annals would be an unnecessary book.
<s>[INST] 将以下文言文流畅地翻译成英语: 著《春秋本意》十二篇，不采三传事实，言： 是非必待三传而后明，是《春秋》为弃书矣。  [/INST] He wrote Twelve Chapters on the Spring and Autumn Annals, and rejected the facts in the Zuo Commentary, the Gongyang Commentary, and the Guliang Commentary. He said: If right and wrong must rely on the Three Commentaries to understand them, then the Spring and Autumn Annals would be an unnecessary book.</s>
将以下文言文流畅地翻译成英语: 著《春秋本意》十二篇，不采三传事实，言： 是非必待三传而后明，是《春秋》为弃书矣。
user
He wrote Twelve Chapters on the Spring and Autumn Annals, and rejected the facts in the Zuo Commentary, the Gongyang Commentary, and the Guliang Commentary. He said: If right and wrong must rely on the Three Commentaries to understand them, then the Spring and Autumn Annals would be an unnecessary book.
assistant