《论衡·卷十五·顺鼓篇》
有人责难说：攻击土地神这种说法，可以认为符合争胜负的道理，但是不能认为符合礼义的规定。
或难曰：攻社谓得胜负之义，未可得顺义之节也。
Some people criticize this statement: attacking the Earth God can be considered as conforming to the truth of winning, but it cannot be considered as conforming to the rules of propriety.
<s>[INST] Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 或难曰：攻社谓得胜负之义，未可得顺义之节也。 [/INST] Modern Chinese: 有人责难说：攻击土地神这种说法，可以认为符合争胜负的道理，但是不能认为符合礼义的规定。 English: Some people criticize this statement: attacking the Earth God can be considered as conforming to the truth of winning, but it cannot be considered as conforming to the rules of propriety.</s>
Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 或难曰：攻社谓得胜负之义，未可得顺义之节也。
user
Modern Chinese: 有人责难说：攻击土地神这种说法，可以认为符合争胜负的道理，但是不能认为符合礼义的规定。 English: Some people criticize this statement: attacking the Earth God can be considered as conforming to the truth of winning, but it cannot be considered as conforming to the rules of propriety.
assistant