《容斋随笔·卷十四·张全义治洛》
《五代史•张全义传》记载十分简略，《资治通鉴》虽稍微详细些，也不够详尽我就选取张文定公所著《洛阳摺绅旧闻记》，节选其中要点记录如下： 如今江淮一带遭受战争创伤的土地，绵延数千里，地方官吏因为守边保障的功劳，越级提拔的，不知有多少人至于真能象张全义所作所为的，我还没有见过难道编修史书受行文法则局限，讥评议论受限制而不能任情吗？
《五代史》于《全义传》书之甚略，《资治通鉴》虽稍详，亦不能尽。辄采张文定公所著《搢绅旧闻记》，芟取其要而载于此。曰： 今荆襄淮沔创痍之余，绵地数千里，长民之官，用守边保障之劳，超阶擢职，不知几何人？其真能仿佛全义所为者，吾未见其人也，岂局于文法讥议，有所制而不得骋乎？
"The History of the Five Dynasties: Biography of Zhang Quanyi" is very brief. Although "Zizhi Tongjian" is slightly more detailed, it is not comprehensive enough. I selected excerpts from "Luoyang Zhe Shen Old News" by Zhang Wendinggong and recorded the key points as follows: : Now the war-torn land in the Jiang淮 area stretches for thousands of miles. I don’t know how many local officials have been promoted because of their contributions to defending the border. As for those who can really do what Zhang Quanyi did, I have not seen it yet. Is it because the compilation of history books is restricted by the rules of the text, and criticism and comments are restricted and cannot be arbitrary?
<s>[INST] Analyze the following Classical Chinese passage and provide both a modern Chinese and an English translation: 《五代史》于《全义传》书之甚略，《资治通鉴》虽稍详，亦不能尽。辄采张文定公所著《搢绅旧闻记》，芟取其要而载于此。曰： 今荆襄淮沔创痍之余，绵地数千里，长民之官，用守边保障之劳，超阶擢职，不知几何人？其真能仿佛全义所为者，吾未见其人也，岂局于文法讥议，有所制而不得骋乎？ [/INST] Modern Chinese Interpretation: 《五代史•张全义传》记载十分简略，《资治通鉴》虽稍微详细些，也不够详尽我就选取张文定公所著《洛阳摺绅旧闻记》，节选其中要点记录如下： 如今江淮一带遭受战争创伤的土地，绵延数千里，地方官吏因为守边保障的功劳，越级提拔的，不知有多少人至于真能象张全义所作所为的，我还没有见过难道编修史书受行文法则局限，讥评议论受限制而不能任情吗？ English Translation: "The History of the Five Dynasties: Biography of Zhang Quanyi" is very brief. Although "Zizhi Tongjian" is slightly more detailed, it is not comprehensive enough. I selected excerpts from "Luoyang Zhe Shen Old News" by Zhang Wendinggong and recorded the key points as follows: : Now the war-torn land in the Jiang淮 area stretches for thousands of miles. I don’t know how many local officials have been promoted because of their contributions to defending the border. As for those who can really do what Zhang Quanyi did, I have not seen it yet. Is it because the compilation of history books is restricted by the rules of the text, and criticism and comments are restricted and cannot be arbitrary?</s>
Analyze the following Classical Chinese passage and provide both a modern Chinese and an English translation: 《五代史》于《全义传》书之甚略，《资治通鉴》虽稍详，亦不能尽。辄采张文定公所著《搢绅旧闻记》，芟取其要而载于此。曰： 今荆襄淮沔创痍之余，绵地数千里，长民之官，用守边保障之劳，超阶擢职，不知几何人？其真能仿佛全义所为者，吾未见其人也，岂局于文法讥议，有所制而不得骋乎？
user
Modern Chinese Interpretation: 《五代史•张全义传》记载十分简略，《资治通鉴》虽稍微详细些，也不够详尽我就选取张文定公所著《洛阳摺绅旧闻记》，节选其中要点记录如下： 如今江淮一带遭受战争创伤的土地，绵延数千里，地方官吏因为守边保障的功劳，越级提拔的，不知有多少人至于真能象张全义所作所为的，我还没有见过难道编修史书受行文法则局限，讥评议论受限制而不能任情吗？ English Translation: "The History of the Five Dynasties: Biography of Zhang Quanyi" is very brief. Although "Zizhi Tongjian" is slightly more detailed, it is not comprehensive enough. I selected excerpts from "Luoyang Zhe Shen Old News" by Zhang Wendinggong and recorded the key points as follows: : Now the war-torn land in the Jiang淮 area stretches for thousands of miles. I don’t know how many local officials have been promoted because of their contributions to defending the border. As for those who can really do what Zhang Quanyi did, I have not seen it yet. Is it because the compilation of history books is restricted by the rules of the text, and criticism and comments are restricted and cannot be arbitrary?
assistant