《宋史·列传·卷一百九十四》
臣今天以《易传》为宗，融汇邵雍、张载的论述，上采汉、魏、吴、晋的有关著作，下及有唐及现在的观点，包罗异同，这样才差不多有可能使已经离开的道而再一次地恢复。 朱震的经学认为王弼全部摒弃汉儒的学说，杂以庄、老的思想，专门讲究文辞，这种做法不正确，所以他对《易经》的象数方面特别加以详细地说明。
臣今以《易传》为宗，和会雍、载之论，上采汉、魏、吴、晋，下逮有唐及今，包括异同，庶几道离而复合。 盖其学以王弼尽去旧说，杂以庄、老，专尚文辞为非是，故其于象数加详焉。
Today, your subject uses the Commentary on the Book of Changes as the foundation, incorporating the theories of Shao Yong and Zhang Zai, and drawing on relevant works from the Han, Wei, Wu, and Jin dynasties, as well as from the Tang dynasty to the present, encompassing both similarities and differences. Only in this way can the Dao that has been lost perhaps be recovered. Zhu Zhen believed that in his study of the classics, Wang Bi completely discarded the teachings of Han scholars, mixed in ideas from Zhuangzi and Laozi, and focused exclusively on literary embellishments, which was an incorrect approach. Therefore, he took special care to expound in detail on the images and numbers in the Book of Changes.
<s>[INST] 请提供这段文言文的现代汉语解释: 臣今以《易传》为宗，和会雍、载之论，上采汉、魏、吴、晋，下逮有唐及今，包括异同，庶几道离而复合。 盖其学以王弼尽去旧说，杂以庄、老，专尚文辞为非是，故其于象数加详焉。 [/INST] 臣今天以《易传》为宗，融汇邵雍、张载的论述，上采汉、魏、吴、晋的有关著作，下及有唐及现在的观点，包罗异同，这样才差不多有可能使已经离开的道而再一次地恢复。 朱震的经学认为王弼全部摒弃汉儒的学说，杂以庄、老的思想，专门讲究文辞，这种做法不正确，所以他对《易经》的象数方面特别加以详细地说明。</s>
请提供这段文言文的现代汉语解释: 臣今以《易传》为宗，和会雍、载之论，上采汉、魏、吴、晋，下逮有唐及今，包括异同，庶几道离而复合。 盖其学以王弼尽去旧说，杂以庄、老，专尚文辞为非是，故其于象数加详焉。
user
臣今天以《易传》为宗，融汇邵雍、张载的论述，上采汉、魏、吴、晋的有关著作，下及有唐及现在的观点，包罗异同，这样才差不多有可能使已经离开的道而再一次地恢复。 朱震的经学认为王弼全部摒弃汉儒的学说，杂以庄、老的思想，专门讲究文辞，这种做法不正确，所以他对《易经》的象数方面特别加以详细地说明。
assistant