《论衡·卷十二·程材篇》
其实，儒生和文吏都有才智，并不是文吏才智高超而儒生才智低下，只是文吏经历的事情多，而儒生没有做过罢了。
儒生、文吏皆有材智，非文吏材高而儒生智下也，文吏更事，儒生不习也。
In fact, both Confucian scholars and literary bureaucrats have wisdom, and it is not that the literary bureaucrats are wise and the Confucian scholars are not. It is only that the literary bureaucrats have experienced more, and the Confucian scholars have not.
<s>[INST] Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 儒生、文吏皆有材智，非文吏材高而儒生智下也，文吏更事，儒生不习也。 [/INST] Modern Chinese: 其实，儒生和文吏都有才智，并不是文吏才智高超而儒生才智低下，只是文吏经历的事情多，而儒生没有做过罢了。 English: In fact, both Confucian scholars and literary bureaucrats have wisdom, and it is not that the literary bureaucrats are wise and the Confucian scholars are not. It is only that the literary bureaucrats have experienced more, and the Confucian scholars have not.</s>
Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 儒生、文吏皆有材智，非文吏材高而儒生智下也，文吏更事，儒生不习也。
user
Modern Chinese: 其实，儒生和文吏都有才智，并不是文吏才智高超而儒生才智低下，只是文吏经历的事情多，而儒生没有做过罢了。 English: In fact, both Confucian scholars and literary bureaucrats have wisdom, and it is not that the literary bureaucrats are wise and the Confucian scholars are not. It is only that the literary bureaucrats have experienced more, and the Confucian scholars have not.
assistant