《宋史·列传·卷一百九十三》
如此，则即便有那种心术不正之人，他也不能专横弄权。陛下又何必屈尊以代大臣之劳呢？
傥得端方不倚之人分处之，自无专恣之虑，何必屈至尊以代其劳哉？
In this way, even if there are people with bad intentions, they cannot be domineering and powerful. Why should Your Majesty condescend to take the place of ministers?
<s>[INST] Provide a modern Chinese interpretation of the following Classical Chinese passage: 傥得端方不倚之人分处之，自无专恣之虑，何必屈至尊以代其劳哉？ [/INST] 如此，则即便有那种心术不正之人，他也不能专横弄权。陛下又何必屈尊以代大臣之劳呢？</s>
Provide a modern Chinese interpretation of the following Classical Chinese passage: 傥得端方不倚之人分处之，自无专恣之虑，何必屈至尊以代其劳哉？
user
如此，则即便有那种心术不正之人，他也不能专横弄权。陛下又何必屈尊以代大臣之劳呢？
assistant