《晋书·列传·第四章》
当时评论的人说杜预的文义直率无华，世人未能看重，衹有秘书监挚虞赞赏，说： 左丘明本来是为《春秋》作传，而《左传》于是单独行于世。《释例》本来是为《传》撰写的，而所发挥阐明的岂止《左传》，因此也独行于世。 
当时论者谓预文义质直，世人未之重，唯秘书监挚虞赏之，曰： 左丘明本为《春秋》作传，而《左传》遂自孤行，《释例》本为《传》设，而所发明何但《左传》，故亦孤行。 
At the time a critic said: Du Yu's writing style is plain and unadorned, thus scholars cannot yet fully appreciate it. Only the secretary-supervisor Zhi Yu praised it, saying: Zuo Qiuming originally wrote a commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals, and so it is that the Commentary of Zuo has come to circulate separately throughout the world. The Explanation of Examples was originally written as an exposition of the Commentary, but what it expounds and interprets is not limited to the Commentary of Zuo, and so it too has come to circulate separately throughout the world.
<s>[INST] Analyze the grammatical structure of the following Classical Chinese sentence and provide its English translation: 寡人之于国也，国之于寡人，无异也。  [/INST] Grammatical analysis: [...], English translation: The寡人(lord) and the country are no different from the country to the寡人(lord).</s>
Analyze the grammatical structure of the following Classical Chinese sentence and provide its English translation: 寡人之于国也，国之于寡人，无异也。
user
Grammatical analysis: [...], English translation: The寡人(lord) and the country are no different from the country to the寡人(lord).
assistant