《水经注·卷三十二》
我按这两条水的水脉、流向完全不同，夏水决无注入肥水的道理。可知应、阐二人的说法都不是确实的证据。
余按川殊派别。无沿注之理，方知应、阚二说，非实证也。
According to my observation of the water sources and flow directions of these two rivers, it was impossible for Xia Shui to inflow into Feishui. Therefore, the statements of Ying and Chan were not supported by solid evidence.
<s>[INST] Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 余按川殊派别。无沿注之理，方知应、阚二说，非实证也。 [/INST] Modern Chinese: 我按这两条水的水脉、流向完全不同，夏水决无注入肥水的道理。可知应、阐二人的说法都不是确实的证据。 English: According to my observation of the water sources and flow directions of these two rivers, it was impossible for Xia Shui to inflow into Feishui. Therefore, the statements of Ying and Chan were not supported by solid evidence.</s>
Give the modern Chinese and English translation for the following Classical Chinese passage: 余按川殊派别。无沿注之理，方知应、阚二说，非实证也。
user
Modern Chinese: 我按这两条水的水脉、流向完全不同，夏水决无注入肥水的道理。可知应、阐二人的说法都不是确实的证据。 English: According to my observation of the water sources and flow directions of these two rivers, it was impossible for Xia Shui to inflow into Feishui. Therefore, the statements of Ying and Chan were not supported by solid evidence.
assistant