《宋史·列传·卷一百一十九》
建炎初年，曾经下诏认为奸臣诬蔑宣仁保佑之功，命史院刊修，还未实行，朱胜非任宰相，皇上告诉他说： 神宗、哲宗两朝史事多失实，不能传信于后世，应当让范冲刊定。 胜非说 ：《神宗史》增加了王安石《日录》，《哲宗史》经过蔡京、蔡卞之手，议论大多不正确，命令官吏删修，足以昭彰二帝的美德。 正好胜非去职，赵鼎以宰相监修二史，是非各得其正。
建炎初，尝下诏以奸臣诬蔑宣仁保佑之功，命史院刊修，未及行，朱胜非为相，上谕之曰： 神宗、哲宗两朝史事多失实，非所以传信后世，宜召范冲刊定。 胜非言： 《神宗史》增多王安石《日录》，《哲宗史》经京、卞之手，议论多不正，命官删修，诚足以彰二帝盛美。 会胜非去位，鼎以宰相监修二史，是非各得其正。
At the beginning of the Jianyan era, an imperial edict had once been issued that the treacherous ministers had slandered the achievement of Xuanren and Baoyou. It was ordered that the imperial academy revise and edit the historical records, but this had not yet been carried out. When Zhu Shengfei became Prime Minister, the Emperor told him: Many events in the reigns of Emperor Shenzong and Emperor Zhezong have been misrecorded and will not be correctly handed down to posterity. Fan Chong should be ordered to determine the definitive text. Shengfei said: The insertion of Wang Anshi’s Daily Records into the History of Emperor Shenzong and the editing of the History of Emperor Zhezong by Cai Jing and Cai Bian have made most of the discussions incorrect. An order should be given to have officials revise and refine these works, which will be sufficient to demonstrate the virtues of the two emperors. It happened that Shengfei left office, and Zhao Ding, as Prime Minister, supervised the revision of the two histories, so that each would reflect the truth.