《明史·列传·卷七十一》
如果一定要考察退职的原因，怀疑表彰贤才原则的误用，那就像宋代蒋之奇曾经诬奏欧阳修，胡之辈曾诬奏朱熹，未听说以一个人的私情而废万世公论。 事情终究未成。正德十一年，广昌知县张杰又为乔新说话，才赠封乔新为太子太保，准予其子袭乔新官爵。第二年赐谥号文肃。
韶嗜学，公暇手不释书。正德初，林俊言韶谥不副行，乞如魏骥、吴讷、叶盛，改谥文。
If we insist on investigating the reason for his resignation and suspect that the principle of rewarding virtuous talents has been misused, it would be like Jiang Zhicai falsely accusing Ouyang Xiu during the Song Dynasty, and Hu Zhi falsely accusing Zhu Xi. We have never heard that the universal public opinion could be abolished because of one's personal grudges. The matter remained unresolved. In the 11th year of the Zhengde era, Zhang Jie, the county magistrate of Guangchang, spoke up for He Qiaoxin again. Emperor Xiaozong posthumously granted He Qiaoxin the title of Prince Taibao and allowed his son to inherit his official title. The following year, He Qiaoxin was posthumously honored as "Wensu".