Argument Visualisation tools
Argumentation is the area that studies the relation between a claim and any statement that supports or opposes this claim.
Argument visualisation is the way to present the arguments, which make it easy way to analysis and evaluate. There are many tools help to visualise arguments used different type of visualisation, such as, network, tree, and table.
Argument graph is import to summarize the complex argument on documents, which make all the argument’s elements and relation clear and explicit. Also it can play role in making decision. The decision can be taken after analysis the graph and find solution for problems.
3.1. Network Visualisation:
It is type of visualisation which support directed and undirected graph. The graph consists of nodes and lines.
3.1.1. CompendiumLD: is an open source visualisation tool that is usually used for learning purposes . It helps education’s staff to organise their ideas, design learning tutorials, and share relevant materials with students. CompendiumLD has a clear layout as Fig. 1 shows. This tool consists of sets of icons. Users can simply drag and drop the icons and use arrows to link between the icons and describe task’s direction between them. The icons are divide to groups according to their objectives . Some icons are used for learning design while other are used to express conditional issues in the task. For example, if a student passes the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
An argument is an attempt to prove that something is true (or probably true) by offering evidence. In philosophy there are usually three premises that are part of the argument. Premises are evidence used to attempt to prove the conclusion. The third premise is the one that sums up that argument. Arguments can be objectively true or subjectively true. For an argument, x is objectively true if and only if x is the case, and x is subjectively true for S if and only if x coheres with S’s worldview of X is simply a matter of taste.
In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.
Just as generals must marshal or gather their troops, argumentative writers must marshal their evidence. Revisit your notes, graphic organizers, and worksheets from the play. Write key points of evidence in the chart below. Then, decide what claim you will make.
An argument is a disagreement between two or more individuals based on ones beliefs or opinions with the purpose of disproving the other person’s beliefs or opinion. There are four elements to make an argument legitimate, and then you have to present the evidence for that argument. Then there is the counterargument where you have to defend your claims followed by your rebuttal where you will have to show all of the evidence you have to disprove the other person argument that they have against yours. If you can present these elements it will show your level of research and intelligence about the subject that is in question.
I. Identify the conclusion of each argument by underlining it. Identify the premises in the order in which they make the most sense by writing a P1 in front of premise 1, a P2 in front of premise 2, and so on.
So, what is an argument? An argument is well defined as giving of reasons, evidence and support for a claim that something is true. Most importantly, there are two essential elements involved in addressing arguments as the basis of critical thinking. The first component is argument identification and the second element is argument evaluation. In this section, we will focus on identification of argument.
The Stephen Toulmin was a British Philosopher who created a system of argumentation, called the Toulmin Model. The Toulmin Model breaks down an argument into six parts: claims (what I hope to prove), evidence (support), warrant (connection between “claims” and “evidence), backing (support for the warrant), rebuttal (potential objection to the claim), and qualifier (limits put on the claim). The first three parts are the most important. The Toulmin Model is an actual structure that can be used in any argument, from academic essays to commercial advertisement. It can also be used to analyze irrational situations.
Arguments are apart of everyday life. We encounter them every day: at home, at work, while watching tv, driving, even listening to the radio. I am not saying we regularly encounter shouting matches, in fact arguing is a communication tool many of us use every day to problem solve. The true nature of arguments is described best by Ramage et al “…argument does not imply anger. In fact, arguing is often pleasurable. It is a creative and productive activity that engages us at high levels of inquiry and critical thinking…” (2). Arguments, at their core, are much more than our initial assumption. An argument can be described as anything that attempts to solve a conflict, that involves at least two conflicting assertions, by appealing to reason. These
The part of an argument have six point according to Toulmin model. The six point are the claim, support, backing, warrant, qualifier and rebuttal. The claim is what the writer is trying to say, basically the thesis statement. The support is the claim or evidence. The backing is like building a connection to the reader’ opinion. The rebuttal create what is wrong about the argument and represent the different point of view. Lastly the qualifier are word used in the argument like always, never, might, all, never change to sometimes and etc.
Argument supported by convincing and integrated evidence and/or examples. Clear ‘case’ is built and argument ‘signposted’.
4). What are some of the conditions necessary for argument to work best? To work best, a productive and potentially successful argument, whether presented in writing, in speech, or in images, require the following elements: An Issue, An Arguer, Audience, Common Ground and A Forum.
Arguments are defeasible, they are not incorrigible, thus defeaters can be presented; therefore, the cumulative case approach of combining a number of arguments to make the case is the best
This information can be used by students to help them organize an argumentative research paper. In addition, both student and instructors can utilize the information as a resource guide.