In this study, a LCA approach was conducted to investigate the eco-efficiency of four widely applied composting strategies: static heaps (SH), windrow composting (WC), membrane-covered composting (MC) and reactor composting (RC). 
LCA
In this study, a LCA approach was conducted to investigate the eco-efficiency of four widely applied composting strategies: static heaps (SH), windrow composting (WC), membrane-covered composting (MC) and reactor composting (RC).  The results showed that the environmental benefits of RC's were decreased by 11.3%, 21.7%, and 6.5% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively.  Advanced composting technologies didn't substantially reduce direct economic costs, however, the eco-efficiency of RC was increased by 296.9%, 54.7%, and 87.6% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively.  Overall, the results demonstrate that RC is a promising solution with high ecological efficiency that can contribute to the sustainable development of intensified livestock production.
RC
In this study, a LCA approach was conducted to investigate the eco-efficiency of four widely applied composting strategies: static heaps (SH), windrow composting (WC), membrane-covered composting (MC) and reactor composting (RC).  The results showed that the environmental benefits of RC's were decreased by 11.3%, 21.7%, and 6.5% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively.  Advanced composting technologies didn't substantially reduce direct economic costs, however, the eco-efficiency of RC was increased by 296.9%, 54.7%, and 87.6% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively. 
SH
In this study, a LCA approach was conducted to investigate the eco-efficiency of four widely applied composting strategies: static heaps (SH), windrow composting (WC), membrane-covered composting (MC) and reactor composting (RC).  The results showed that the environmental benefits of RC's were decreased by 11.3%, 21.7%, and 6.5% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively.  Advanced composting technologies didn't substantially reduce direct economic costs, however, the eco-efficiency of RC was increased by 296.9%, 54.7%, and 87.6% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively. 
WC
In this study, a LCA approach was conducted to investigate the eco-efficiency of four widely applied composting strategies: static heaps (SH), windrow composting (WC), membrane-covered composting (MC) and reactor composting (RC).  The results showed that the environmental benefits of RC's were decreased by 11.3%, 21.7%, and 6.5% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively.  Advanced composting technologies didn't substantially reduce direct economic costs, however, the eco-efficiency of RC was increased by 296.9%, 54.7%, and 87.6% compared to SH, WC, and MC, respectively. 
MC