Literature clustering networks and Frontier knowledge bases were investigated using bibliometrix-BiblioShiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace bibliometric platforms. 
bibliometrix-BiblioShiny
Literature clustering networks and Frontier knowledge bases were investigated using bibliometrix-BiblioShiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace bibliometric platforms.  VOSviewer was used to examine cooperation between institutions and identify citation relationships between journals. 
VOSviewer
Literature clustering networks and Frontier knowledge bases were investigated using bibliometrix-BiblioShiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace bibliometric platforms.  We used CiteSpace to identify clustering keywords over the timeline and identify keywords with the strongest citation bursts. 
CiteSpace
A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in macular edema: exploring research hotspots and Frontiers.Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in ophthalmological disease screening and diagnostics, medical image diagnostics, and predicting late-disease progression rates.  We reviewed all AI publications associated with macular edema (ME) research Between 2011 and 2022 and performed modeling, quantitative, and qualitative investigations.  Methods: On 1st February 2023, we screened the Web of Science Core Collection for AI applications related to ME, from which 297 studies were identified and analyzed (2011-2022).  We collected information on: publications, institutions, country/region, keywords, journal name, references, and research hotspots.  Literature clustering networks and Frontier knowledge bases were investigated using bibliometrix-BiblioShiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace bibliometric platforms.  We used the R "bibliometrix" package to synopsize our observations, enumerate keywords, visualize collaboration networks between countries/regions, and generate a topic trends plot.  VOSviewer was used to examine cooperation between institutions and identify citation relationships between journals.  We used CiteSpace to identify clustering keywords over the timeline and identify keywords with the strongest citation bursts.  Results: In total, 47 countries published AI studies related to ME; the United States had the highest H-index, thus the greatest influence.  China and the United States cooperated most closely between all countries.  Also, 613 institutions generated publications - the Medical University of Vienna had the highest number of studies.  This publication record and H-index meant the university was the most influential in the ME field.  Reference clusters were also categorized into 10 headings: retinal Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) fluid detection, convolutional network models, deep learning (DL)-based single-shot predictions, retinal vascular disease, diabetic retinopathy (DR), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), automated macular pathology diagnosis, dry age-related macular degeneration (DARMD), class weight, and advanced DL architecture systems.  Frontier keywords were represented by diabetic macular edema (DME) (2021-2022).  Conclusion: Our review of the AI-related ME literature was comprehensive, systematic, and objective, and identified future trends and current hotspots.  With increased DL outputs, the ME research focus has gradually shifted from manual ME examinations to automatic ME detection and associated symptoms.  In this review, we present a comprehensive and dynamic overview of AI in ME and identify future research areas.
R