Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.) CONCLUSIONS: SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. 
THERM
Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.) CONCLUSIONS: SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. 
THERM
Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.) CONCLUSIONS: SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. 
THERM
Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.) CONCLUSIONS: SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. 
THERM