The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).


 Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched.  No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. 
CBCT
The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).


 Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched.  No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. 
CBCT
The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).


 Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched.  No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. 
CBCT
The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).



conventional intraoral radiography
The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).


 Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched.  No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. 
CBCT