Unification of the W1X and G4(MP2)-6X Composite Protocols.We have devised the composite procedures WG and WGh to unify the W1X and the (computationally more economical) G4(MP2)-6X protocols.  Our benchmark shows that, in general, both WG and WGh have similar performance to that for W1X-2, with WGh (predictably) performing somewhat less well for electron affinities.  In terms of computational efficiency, WG is approximately an order of magnitude less costly than W1X-2, while WGh gives not only a further slight savings in computer time but also a notably reduced disk requirement.
W1X
Unification of the W1X and G4(MP2)-6X Composite Protocols.We have devised the composite procedures WG and WGh to unify the W1X and the (computationally more economical) G4(MP2)-6X protocols. 
G4(MP2)-6X
Unification of the W1X and G4(MP2)-6X Composite Protocols.We have devised the composite procedures WG and WGh to unify the W1X and the (computationally more economical) G4(MP2)-6X protocols.  The WG procedure employs a combination of MP2, MP2-F12, CCSD-F12b, and CCSD(T) to approximate the all-electron scalar-relativistic CCSD(T)/CBS energy.  The WGh protocol represents a somewhat more economical variant of WG with partial removal of diffuse functions.  Our benchmark shows that, in general, both WG and WGh have similar performance to that for W1X-2, with WGh (predictably) performing somewhat less well for electron affinities.  In terms of computational efficiency, WG is approximately an order of magnitude less costly than W1X-2, while WGh gives not only a further slight savings in computer time but also a notably reduced disk requirement.
WG
Unification of the W1X and G4(MP2)-6X Composite Protocols.We have devised the composite procedures WG and WGh to unify the W1X and the (computationally more economical) G4(MP2)-6X protocols.  The WGh protocol represents a somewhat more economical variant of WG with partial removal of diffuse functions.  Our benchmark shows that, in general, both WG and WGh have similar performance to that for W1X-2, with WGh (predictably) performing somewhat less well for electron affinities.  In terms of computational efficiency, WG is approximately an order of magnitude less costly than W1X-2, while WGh gives not only a further slight savings in computer time but also a notably reduced disk requirement.
WGh
Unification of the W1X and G4(MP2)-6X Composite Protocols.We have devised the composite procedures WG and WGh to unify the W1X and the (computationally more economical) G4(MP2)-6X protocols.  The WG procedure employs a combination of MP2, MP2-F12, CCSD-F12b, and CCSD(T) to approximate the all-electron scalar-relativistic CCSD(T)/CBS energy. 
MP2
The WG procedure employs a combination of MP2, MP2-F12, CCSD-F12b, and CCSD(T) to approximate the all-electron scalar-relativistic CCSD(T)/CBS energy. 
CCSD-F12b
The WG procedure employs a combination of MP2, MP2-F12, CCSD-F12b, and CCSD(T) to approximate the all-electron scalar-relativistic CCSD(T)/CBS energy. 
CCSD(T)
The WG procedure employs a combination of MP2, MP2-F12, CCSD-F12b, and CCSD(T) to approximate the all-electron scalar-relativistic CCSD(T)/CBS energy. 
CBS