[System]
You are a **scientific‐rigor auditor**. You will receive the parsed contents of a research paper. Your job is to identify **only** those errors or flaws that directly undermine the **scientific validity** of the paper’s methods, analyses, or conclusions.

Your sole focus is to identify flaws—such as errors in experimental design, data integrity, calculations, statistical inference, or reproducibility—that directly call into question the validity of a specific claim, paragraph, or the paper as a whole.

**Do not** report issues that are purely presentational, rhetorical, stylistic, or related to citation practices.

---

After you’ve done a **detailed walkthrough** of the paper, output exactly in this format—no extra keys or commentary:

```
<analysis>
{detailed walk‑through of how you checked each section/figure and why you flagged (or did not flag) any flaw}
</analysis>

<response>
{
  "has_error": <true|false>,
  "errors": [
    {
      "location": "Section 2.1",
      "description": "Claim that ‘all X are Y’ is contradicted by citation [5], which shows examples of non‑Y X."
    },
    {
      "location": "Figure 3",
      "description": "XAxis labeled ‘Time (s)’ but units appear to be milliseconds; scale bar mismatches caption."
    }
    // …more entries…
  ]
}
</response>
```

- **Do not** include any other keys or prose outside these two tagged blocks.
- **Do not** report stylistic or citation issues.
- Be as precise as possible about **where** (section ID or figure/table) and **what** the scientific flaw is.
- Each description for the errors must be rooted in a scientific rationale explaining why it is 'wrong' (not how it could be improved).

Begin your analysis now.

[User]
1. The electromagnetic field (EMF) plays a crucial role in modern environments. It enhances human life experience, using the Internet of Things (IoT), navigation and global positioning system (GPS), entertainment, and media,^1 improves medical imaging and diagnosis using medical X-rays and radiation therapy,^2 and accelerates the progress of sciences.^3 As a lateral effect, continuous exposure to EMF influences the human body's delicate and sensitive

2. Conclusion: The RF-EMR and ELF-EMF exposures exhibit both beneficial and adverse effects. Nevertheless, the precise conditions and circumstances under which detrimental or beneficial effects manifest (either individually or simultaneously) remain uncertain.

3. Results: Exposure to RF-EMR can potentially exert adverse effects on the performance of CNS by inducing changes in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), neurotransmitter levels, calcium channel regulation, myelin protein structure, the antioxidant defense system, and metabolic processes. However, it is noteworthy that certain reports have suggested that RF-EMR exposure may confer cognitive benefits for various conditions and disorders. ELF-EMF exposure has been associated with the enhancement of CNS performance, marked by improved memory retention, enhanced learning ability, and potential mitigation of neurodegenerative diseases. Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that ELF-EMF exposure has also been linked to the induction of anxiety states, oxidative stress, and alterations in hormonal regulation. Moreover, ELF-EMR exposure alters hippocampal function, notch signaling pathways, the antioxidant defense system, and synaptic activities.

4. Introduction: Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) have emerged as noteworthy sources of environmental pollution in the contemporary era. The potential biological impacts of RF-EMR and ELF-EMF exposure on human organs, particularly the central nervous system (CNS), have garnered considerable attention in numerous research studies.

5. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, Extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field, Central nervous system

6. Methods: This article presents a comprehensive yet summarized review of the research on the explicit/implicit effects of RF-EMR and ELF-EMF exposure on CNS performance.

7. ¹Laser and Plasma Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 19839-69411, Iran
²Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 19839-69411, Iran

8. Ramin Eskandani¹, Mohammad Ismail Zibaii¹,²*

9. © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published by BioImpacts as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

10. Article History:
Received: 20 Aug. 2023
Revised: 9 Nov. 2023
Accepted: 26 Nov. 2023
ePublished: 30 Dec. 2023

to investigate the effects of EMF on the CNS in vitro and in vivo (e.g., mice and monkeys).^5,7,8 Despite several studies, uncertainties surround the parameters used in investigations, including operational frequency, power density, and irradiation time, which hinders reproducibility and comparability.^7 Consequently, organizing studies to outline similarities and differences between various studies is crucial. This review summarizes the possible biological effects of EMF exposure on CNS functionality.

EMF is engendered through the motion of electrically charged particles, particularly electrons. It can originate from various sources, including power lines, lightning, solenoid coils, and Helmholtz coils.^9 EMF manifests in two distinct forms, static EMF and dynamic EMF. Static EMF maintains constancy over time, as observed in the cases of permanent magnets and the Earth's magnetic field. In contrast, dynamic EMF undergoes temporal changes, leading to the emergence of electromagnetic radiation (EMR).^9

An EMR is comprised of perpendicular electric and magnetic fields, moving through space at the speed of light and bearing both momentum and electromagnetic radiant energy.^9 As shown in Fig. 1, the EMR spectrum encompasses sundry frequencies, including non-ionizing radiations, such as radio waves, infrared, visible light, and ultraviolet, and ionizing radiations, including X-rays and gamma rays. Various types of EMR play a distinct role within this spectrum of electromagnetic phenomena.^9 Numerous studies have focused on electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EH),^10 EMR impacts on immune dysfunction,^11 neurological diseases,^5,12,13 kidney damage,^14 reproductive disorders,^15 and genetic damage,^16 for which notable debates are ongoing.

The brain regulates cognitive and behavioral functions, and the extent of RF-EMR’s impact on the brain, whether implicit or explicit, remains incompletely elucidated. Nonetheless, the effects of RF-EMR on living organisms can be categorized into two primary domains: thermal effects and non-thermal effects.^18,19 Non-ionizing radiation interacts with matter and living organisms by producing dielectric heat.^18,19 The radiation that enters the tissues is converted into heightened kinetic energy within the molecules that absorb it, increasing the tissue temperature. The degree of increase in temperature hinges on the amount of power absorbed by the tissues, which, in turn, is contingent on the tissue’s absorption coefficient and inherent cooling mechanisms. Water plays a crucial role in the thermal absorption of radiation due to its high absorption coefficient.^18,20 When the heat absorbed by the body or specific body parts surpasses its capacity to regulate temperature, it can damage tissue. These detrimental effects typically manifest when the absorbed power levels far exceed the body’s metabolic capacity. As the absorbed energy increases, the biological mechanisms for temperature regulation gradually falter, ultimately leading to an uncontrollable escalation in body temperature and death. Michaelson et al provided demonstrations of these effects in dogs and rats.^18,21

The absorption of radiation within the biological system exhibits variations contingent upon tissue characteristics. Tissues characterized by higher water content, such as skin, CNS, internal organs, and muscle, display pronounced radiation absorption, impeding deep penetration. Conversely, tissues containing less water, such as bone and fat, exhibit a reduced capacity for radiation absorption.^21 Some studies have asserted that RF-EMR exposure may affect metabolic processes in the

brain. RF-EMR exposure may also cause thermal changes, alter calcium channels,²²,²³ cause demyelination,²⁴ and impair autophagic activities in neurons.²³,²⁵ There is still debate surrounding the impact of non-thermal effects on BBB permeability, blood pressure, and encephalogram.²⁶

The nonthermal effects arise from forces acting on particles, known as the pearl chain effect. The pearl chain effect becomes evident when suspended particles such as leucocytes or erythrocytes are exposed to a pulsed or continuous RF-EMR within the 1-100 MHz range. Under these conditions, the particles are arranged into chains parallel to the electric field lines. Different particles have a specific frequency range at which this effect occurs. The RF-EMR generates dipole charges, causing the particles to attract each other to form chains.¹⁸,²¹

Another nonthermal effect is the dielectric saturation observed in solutions containing proteins and other biological macromolecules subjected to intense RF-EMR exposure. It is proposed that RF-EMR exposure can align macromolecules’ polarized side chains to align with the direction of the electric field. Upon intense RF-EMR exposure, hydration zones and hydrogen bonds are disrupted due to this alignment, potentially causing denaturation or coagulation of the molecules. Experimental confirmation of these effects has been obtained.²² In the case of birds, EMFs can trigger neuromuscular responses. Additionally, studies have reported direct and indirect effects on the CNS at levels below 10 mW/cm².¹⁸,²¹

According to a study conducted by Leszczynski et al, 900 MHz RF-EMR exposure may activate hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway non-thermally.²⁷ Pilla et al have concluded that weak non-thermal EMF signals induce CaM-dependent nitric oxide signaling response in cells and tissue.²⁸ Wust et al suggest that non-thermal RF-EMR exposure may have antiproliferative effects and could present a high potential to improve future treatments in oncology.²⁹ Okechukwu et al reported that RF-EMF exposure can affect neurophysiological mechanisms, as seen in EEG and biochemical studies. However, no evidence links RF-EMF exposure to brain tumors.³⁰ Several studies have indicated that there might be a link between RF-EMR and cancer,³¹,³² while contrasting studies have found no clear evidence of RF-EMR dormant carcinogenicity.³² Current findings indicate that this connection between RF-EMR potential carcinogenicity and the CNS is considerably complex due to various other factors that could affect the results.²⁵ In a study by Takebayashi et al, 322 individuals with tumors exposed to RF-EMR with specific absorption rate (SAR) values below 0.1 W/kg were examined. They concluded that regular cellular phone usage does not increase the risk of cancer occurrence.³³ Jimenez et al suggest that non-ionizing RF-EMR exposure can be utilized as a cancer treatment approach.³⁴ Pall et al have indicated that exposure to non-thermal RF-EMFs can cause neuropsychiatric effects.³⁵

Studies conducted on animals, cellular models, and epidemiological data consistently suggest that individuals in early developmental stages, such as fetuses, infants, children, and adolescents, may exhibit heightened vulnerability to the adverse effects of EMF and demyelination.³⁶,³⁷

## RF-EMR exposure effects on the BBB

The BBB is important in upholding a tightly regulated extracellular environment essential for precise synaptic transmissions and protecting nerve cells from potential harm. When the BBB’s permeability is elevated, it can lead to severe adverse consequences. Narayanan et al have observed that RF-EMR exposure induces a transient increase in the BBB’s permeability for macromolecules.³⁸ Stam et al have reported that the intracranial temperature rises by more than 1 °C due to RF-EMR exposure.³⁹ This phenomenon highlights the potential impact of RF-EMR on the BBB function and its implications for neural health.³⁹ Schirmacher et al demonstrated that 1.8 GHz RF-EMR exposure increases the BBB permeability to sucrose.⁴⁰ In animal experiments on rats, Nittby et al observed that albumin leaked through the BBB at 900 MHz frequencies.⁴¹ However, Kuribayashi et al did not witness BBB leakage during in vitro experiments.⁴² Sutton et al have announced that 2.45 GHz RF-EMR exposure may induce hyperthermia in the brain, increasing the BBB permeability.⁴³ Likewise, Oscar et al have demonstrated that both continuous and pulsed waves at 1.3 GHz can cause an increment in BBB permeability.⁴⁴ D’Andrea et al have emphasized that the magnitude of permeability alterations may depend on the SAR of the signal.⁴⁵ Accordingly, when exposed to high levels of SAR, the temperature of the cranial nervous system increases, and this can cause changes in the physical characteristics of the BBB. On the other hand, low levels of SAR exposure have no impact on the permeability of the BBB.⁴⁵ Fritze et al proposed that BBB permeability could possibly increase from exposure to RF-EMRs, even without any thermal effects.⁴⁶ Sirav et al investigated the effect of pulse-modulated 900 MHz and 1800 MHz RF-EMR on the BBB permeability. They concluded that cellular phone radiation increases the BBB permeability in lower exposure levels.⁴⁷ The topic of alterations in the BBB permeability followed by RF-EMR exposure is a matter of controversy due to conflicting results. There is a possibility that RF-EMR exposure may impact the BBB permeability by altering blood pressure.⁴⁸ Therefore, conducting thorough research to evaluate RF-EMR exposure impact on blood pressure and its complications is crucial.

## RF-EMR exposure effects on learning and memory

RF-EMR exposure customarily occurs while using cellular phones near the nervous system in the head, which may lead to different neurological effects. These effects include sleep problems,⁴⁹ blood pressure changes,⁵⁰ headaches,⁵¹ alterations in electroencephalogram,⁵² and

loss of concentration.¹² Moreover, several epidemiological and experimental studies have reported the occurrence of tremors, vertigo, amnesia, and concentration loss followed by RF-EMR exposure.² It has been hypothesized that RF-EMR exposure may cause an alteration in neuron calcium levels, leading to oxidative stress in brain cells.¹⁹ Nonetheless, the RF-EMR exposure intensity in the public environment is not detrimental.⁵³ Wang et al conducted behavioral tests on rats exposed to RF-EMR and demonstrated that chronic exposure to pulsed 2450 MHz RF-EMF may reduce learning ability and memory functions.⁵⁴ Additionally, Cassel et al took a whole-body approach, exposing rats to 2450 MHz RF-EMR with a SAR level of 0.6 W/kg for a duration of 45 min/day and 5 days/week for ten days. Results from the radial maze test (RMT) indicate that the radiation did not affect the working memory.⁵⁵ Similarly, in a research conducted on rats by Son et al, exposure to 1950 MHz RF-EMR for a duration of 2 hours/day and 5 days/week for three months demonstrated no considerable change in working memory.⁵⁶ Dubreuil et al have observed that low SAR exposure levels had no impact on learning and memory in a head-only exposure approach.⁵⁷ Also, high SAR levels led to changes in certain exploratory activities.⁵⁷ RF-EMR exposure influences cognitive abilities, including memory loss and cognitive abilities in humans,⁵⁸ and animals.⁵⁹ But, there is no direct evidence for these effects.⁶⁰ Tattersall et al suggest that low-intensity RF-EMF radiation at 700 MHz may affect the hippocampus, leading to alterations in the electrical activity of hippocampal slices in rat brains.⁶¹ Moreover, Xu et al have noted that chronic exposure to 1800 MHz can lead to a reduction in excitatory synaptic activity in cultured hippocampal neurons.⁶² Kumlin et al have asserted that spatial memory performance was not changed in experiments conducted on young rats exposed to 900 MHz RF-EMR with 3 W/kg SAR level for five weeks.⁶³ On the other hand, Zhu et al exposed adult male Wistar rats to 1.5 GHz and 4.3 GHz RF-EMR, utilizing the experimental setup shown in Fig. 2, and concluded that the RF-EMR exposure may induce cognitive impairment and cause hippocampal tissue damage.⁶⁴ Moreover, when exposed to a combination of 1.5 GHz and 4.3 GHz RF-EMR, the damage was more severe, but frequency had no contribution to the gravity of the damages.⁶⁴

RF-EMR exposure effects on neurotransmitters
Several studies have focused on the effect of RF-EMR exposure on neurotransmitters in nervous systems. Neurotransmitters serve as pivotal mediators in neuronal communication, representing specialized molecules that are indispensable messengers in synaptic transmission. They exert a profound influence on cognitive and emotional behaviors, holding a pivotal role in brain development, encompassing neurotransmission, cellular differentiation, and the establishment of neural circuitry. Alterations in the concentrations of specific neurotransmitters are intimately linked to a spectrum of neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia, and depression.⁶⁰,⁶¹

Dopamine (DA) is a fundamental neurotransmitter found in the hypothalamus. It is also secreted from the pituitary gland,⁴,⁶⁵ playing a vital role as a precursor to norepinephrine. It is instrumental in a wide array of cerebral functions, including motor control, learning, executive functions, emotional regulation, and the processing of reward.⁴,⁶⁵,⁶⁶ Furthermore, DA has been implicated in several psychiatric and neurological disorders, notably PD.⁴,⁶⁷ In a study, Ezz et al exposed male adult rats to EMR with a SAR level of 0.845 W/kg and frequency of 1.8 GHz for a duration of 1 hour/day

| A                                                                                | B                                                                                |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| * Controller
* Microwave source
* High voltage power supply modulator
* Klystron tube
* Four-port circulators
* Directional coupler
* Oscilloscope
* Directional coupler
* Calibrated detector
* Horn Antenna | - 1.5 GHz microwave antenna
- 4.3 GHz microwave antenna
- 85 cm
- Rats
- Uniform rotation
- Radiation platform
- Slide |
| C- 73 cm
- 43 cm
- 8 cm
- Divided into 30 equal parts                                                                                |                                                                                |

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for RF-EMR exposure. The experimental design includes a microwave radiation source (A), a microwave radiation process (B), and a rat container (C).⁶⁴

4 | BioImpacts. 2024;14(4):30064

for two months and concluded that the production of DA was decreased, influencing the rat arousal, advancing to declined learning and memory abilities in comparison to control rats.⁴⁶⁸ In another study, Maaroufi et al exposed adult male rats to RF-EMR with the frequency of 900 MHz, SAR level of 0.051 W/kg for a duration of 1 hour/day for 21 successive days and observed that DA amount in rat hippocampus has decreased compared to unexposed rats.⁴⁶⁹ Also, Kim et al exposed male C57BL/6 adult rats to RF-EMR with a frequency of 835 MHz and SAR level of 4.00 W/kg for 5 hours/day for three weeks and observed a decline in DA concentration.⁴⁷⁰ Conclusively, RF-EMR exposure leads to decreased DA concentrations causing complications in mood, memory, and learning abilities.⁴⁷⁰

Norepinephrine is a neurotransmitter primarily synthesized and released by sympathetic postganglionic neurons. It is also secreted from adrenergic nerve endings within the brain.⁴⁷¹ Norepinephrine release in the brain is involved in several processes, including inflammation, attention, stress, sleep, and autonomic nervous system responses.⁴ According to Megha et al, prolonged exposure to 1.8 GHz RF-EMR leads to a notable decline in norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in the hippocampal tissue of rats. This suggests that certain conditions of RF-EMR could potentially reduce the levels of these substances in the brain.⁴⁷² In a study by Cao et al, it was found that exposing male LACA mice to 900 MHz RF-EMR with an intensity of 1 mW/cm² could lead to an increase in their norepinephrine levels. However, no significant changes in norepinephrine content were observed when the exposure intensity was 2 or 5 mW/cm².⁴⁷³ Several studies have investigated the effect of RF-EMR exposure on 5-Hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin), excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters, inhibitory neurotransmitters such as Acetylcholine, and peptide levels.⁴ A summary of RF-EMR exposure effects on CNS is depicted in Fig. 3.

## Effect of RF-EMR exposure on oxidative stress and antioxidant defense system

Exposure to EMF exerts notable effects on living organisms, particularly pertaining to the intricate interplay of oxidants, antioxidants, and oxidative stress mechanisms.⁷⁶ Living organisms possess an antioxidant defense mechanism to counteract oxidative damage induced by free radicals. Nonetheless, the brain's high oxygen consumption renders it susceptible to reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, which impairs the CNS performance.⁷⁶ EMF exposure ought to disrupt this delicate balance between oxidants and antioxidants, leading to oxidative stress within the cellular milieu.⁷⁷

Extensive experimental data from EMF exposure studies conducted on diverse living organisms have been diligently scrutinized to bolster this hypothesis.⁷² Oxidative stress, resulting from EMF exposure, holds potential detrimental implications for human health, given its influence on dynamic and non-linear biological pathways, magnifying the biochemical effects even with slight alterations in free radical concentrations.⁷⁸ Antioxidants influence biological systems via multiple mechanisms, including electron transfer, chelation of metal ions, cooperation as co-antioxidants, and the sustenance of gene expression regulation.⁷⁹

Glutathione (GSH), an endogenous antioxidant, assumes a pivotal role in safeguarding cells against oxidative harm.⁷⁸⁸⁰ The tissue concentrations of GSH serve as a metric frequently employed to gauge the extent of radical-induced injury.⁸⁰⁸¹ Investigations have illuminated that exposure to RF-EMF can curtail GSH levels in cerebral tissue and the bloodstream.⁷⁹⁻⁸¹ Catalase (CAT), an enzymatic entity ubiquitous in oxygen-exposed organisms, operates by catalyzing the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and

Existing scholarship posits that exposure to RF-EMR might instigate a decrement in CAT activity.⁸⁰⁻⁸² Superoxide dismutase (SOD), an enzymatic agent, fulfills the duty of catalyzing the transformation of deleterious superoxide radicals into molecular oxygen or hydrogen peroxide.⁸⁰ Superoxide, a radical byproduct of oxygen metabolism, can potentially inflict cellular damage.⁸⁰ Empirical investigations have established a correlation between exposure to RF-EMR, augmented levels of ROS, and diminished SOD activity.⁸⁰,⁸¹ Multiple scholarly inquiries have additionally contended that specific antioxidants, such as Vitamin B9, Vitamin E, and N-acetyl-5-methoxy tryptamine, possess the capacity to ameliorate potential injurious consequences stemming from RF-EMR exposure.⁸⁰,⁸¹

Brain development is a complex process that begins before birth and continues throughout adulthood. It involves the growth and maturation of the brain’s structure and function, which can be influenced by various factors such as genetics, nutrition, exposure to toxins or infections, EMF exposure as well as the child’s interactions with other people and the environment.⁷⁴,⁸³

Throughout life, the brain proliferates and goes through critical periods.⁸³ The first critical period occurs around the age of two years. Disruptions or negative experiences during this time can have significant and potentially long-lasting effects. Stress, trauma, and exposure to violence or toxins can harm a child’s brain and lead to complications later in life.⁸³

Adolescence represents a pivotal phase for brain maturation, marked by a continuum of cerebral transformations concurrent with physical, emotional, and social adjustments. These multifaceted developments heighten the vulnerability to the onset of mental health disorders. This period is particularly noteworthy for the emergence of a spectrum of mental illnesses, including but not limited to depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. The long-lasting development of the prefrontal cortex may also contribute to the rise in mental health issues among teenagers.⁸³ There exist alarming reports concerning RF-EMR-caused poor brain development. It was observed that exposure to RF-EMR may cause neurodegeneration and impair the differentiation of stem cells into neuron cells.⁷⁴ Furthermore, the literature demonstrates an association between RF-EMR exposure and AD,⁸⁴ PD,⁸⁵ Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS),⁸⁶ and Huntington’s disease,⁸⁷ albeit solid evidence is still absent.

During the prenatal period, Bas et al exposed juvenile rats to RF-EMR and observed a significant decline in pyramidal cells in their hippocampus. Further histopathological analysis of RF-EMR-exposed rats’ hippocampus revealed darkening of the pyramidal cell perikaryon and shrinkage and deterioration compared to the control group.⁷⁴,⁸⁸ Odaci et al examined the impact of 900 MHz RF-EMR exposure on the dentate gyrus of rats during the prenatal period. They observed a significant decline in granule cells in the postnatal period due to prenatal exposure to RF-EMR.⁷⁴,⁸⁹ Jiang et al observed that long-term exposure to RF-EMR can enhance oxidative stress and result in AD-like symptoms.⁷⁴,⁸⁴ In a recent study, the migraine reoccurrence rate in heavily exposed subjects increased.⁷⁴,⁹⁰ However, some studies have reported that exposure to RF-EMR improves cognitive activity and benefits CNS disorders.⁷⁴,⁹⁰ Arendash et al figured that long-term exposure to EMFs could protect transgenic mice from AD by improving cognitive activity and reducing Aβ neuropathology.⁷⁴,⁹¹ EMF-based therapies can enhance brain mitochondrial dysfunction and provide cognitive benefits to areas of the brain affected by AD, such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.⁷⁴,⁹¹ Recent studies have demonstrated that RF-EMR exposure can elevate the risk of brain tumors and negatively impact cognitive function in children, reducing the number of neurons in the hippocampus.⁷⁴ Czyz et al observed that 900 MHz RF-EMR exposure alters gene expression in embryonic stem cells lacking p53.⁷⁴,⁹² Belyaev et al reported that 915 MHz RF-EMR exposure had adverse effects on human stem cells and could potentially cause cancer.⁷⁴,⁹³ Aldad et al conducted an animal experiment and exposed the embryos of pregnant mothers to RF-EMR. They reported cognitive and memory impairment in the offspring.⁷⁴,⁹⁴

Studies have shown that being exposed to ELF EMFs may cause changes in the nervous system’s morphology, neuroelectrical, neurochemistry, animal behavior, and cognition.⁵,⁶

The ramifications of ELF-EMF on human health in the context of potential oxidative stress induction have been a subject of recurring discourse within the scientific sphere. ELF-EMF serves as an elicitor of cellular and organismal stress responses, thus conferring upon it the characterization of a stressor. Instances of exposure to ELF-EMF engender a spectrum of effects on the internal workings of the human body, encompassing both favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Notably, these effects manifest as alterations in the functions of the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, all of which hold relevance to stress-related phenomena.⁹⁵ The ensuing alterations can span across physiological and morphological domains.⁹⁵

Garip et al exposed human leukemia cells (k562) to 50 Hz ELF-EMF with 1mT magnetic intensity for 3 hours and observed that ELF-EMF exposure impact on biological systems relies on the cell’s condition.⁹⁶ In cells not exposed

to oxidative stress, it can reduce the number of apoptotic cells by raising heat shock protein (HSP) levels.⁹⁶ However, it increases the apoptosis rate in cells induced by oxidative stress.⁹⁶ According to Mannerling et al, an elevated production of ROS caused by ELF-EMF was observed in human leukemia cells.⁹⁷ Vannoni et al exposed human osteoarthritic cells to 100 Hz ELF-EMF and observed increased ROS production.⁹⁸ Yin et al utilized a Helmholtz coil to expose newborn Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats’ dissected hippocampus to 50 Hz ELF-EMF with 15 mT in the coil center and studied the neuroprotective effect of Lotus seedpod procyanidins (LSPCs).⁹⁹ They concluded that compared with un-exposed rats, exposure to ELF-EMF led to a significant decrease in cell viability and an increase in apoptotic cells.⁹⁹ However, LSPCs were found to effectively protect the hippocampal neurons from the cell damage caused by ELF-EMF.⁹⁹ In addition, when a specific concentration of LSPCs was present, it stopped the increase of ROS and Ca²⁺ levels inside cells.⁹⁹ It also prevented the disturbance of mitochondrial membrane potential caused by exposure to ELF-EMF.⁹⁹ Calcabrini et al exposed a normal human keratinocyte cell line (NCTC2544) to 50 Hz ELF-EMF with a maximum of 2 G magnetic field strength and reported increased ROS generation and decreased antioxidant activity.¹⁰⁰ The in vivo studies are in agreement with in vitro research.⁹⁵ Sun et al subjected Caenorhabditis elegans, from the embryonic stage through the fourth larval stage, to a 50 Hz ELF-EMF featuring a 3 mT magnetic intensity. They employed Helmholtz coils for this exposure and observed perturbations in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle's metabolic processes, along with the generation of PGE2, which exhibited associations with responses to oxidative stress provoked by ELF-EMF.¹⁰¹ Akdag et al exposed groups of SD rats to 50 Hz ELF-EMF with 100 and 500 μT magnetic intensity.¹⁰² They concluded that prolonged exposure to ELF-EMF demonstrated no discernible influence on apoptosis. Nonetheless, exposure to both 100 and 500 μT ELF-EMF had deleterious consequences on the rat brain, characterized by heightened oxidative stress and a compromised antioxidant defense system, with a particular impact on CAT activity.¹⁰² Goraca et al exposed two groups of Wistar rats to 40 Hz ELF-EMF with 7 mT for 30 min/day and 60 min/day.¹⁰³ They have determined that the production of ROS in heart tissue and the plasma’s antioxidant capacity depend on the length of exposure, by a more extended period of time imposing more acute and detrimental effects. In addition, several studies have determined that ELF-EMF may affect antioxidant defense capabilities.¹⁰³

## Effect of ELF-EMF exposure on brain tumor

Brain tumor constitutes a significant challenge to global health and well-being. It is widely believed that ELF-EMF exposure, whether in occupational or residential settings, may have carcinogenic effects.¹⁰⁴ The hypothesis posits that individuals residing in proximity to power lines and individuals who are exposed to occupational and residential ELF-EMF face an elevated risk of developing brain tumors.¹⁰⁵ There have been numerous studies conducted to examine the accuracy of this hypothesis. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent. Although some studies have found a positive link between exposure to ELF-EMF and cancer,¹⁰⁶,¹⁰⁷ several research has found evidence to the contrary.¹⁰⁸,¹⁰⁹ The association between ELF-EMF exposure and cancer was first articulated in 1979 in the context of childhood leukemia.¹¹⁰ In 1976, Wertheimer and Leeper put forth a hypothesis suggesting a possible connection between the flow of current in water pipes or exposure to ELF-EMF and the heightened risk of childhood cancer.¹¹⁰ Their research findings indicated that the risk of childhood cancer was probably related to the dose of exposure.¹¹⁰ Several studies have investigated the association between exposure to ELF-EMF and the incidence of brain tumors. Li et al found a link between maternal occupational ELF-EMF exposure and specific brain tumor occurrences in their offspring.¹¹¹ Juutilainen et al reported an increased risk of leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, and central nervous system tumors among workers with ELF-EMF exposure.¹¹² Turner et al’s investigation indicates that occupational ELF-EMF exposure may promote glioma, but methodological sources of bias must be considered.¹¹³ Carlberg et al’s case-control studies showed an elevated risk of grade IV astrocytoma due to occupational ELF-EMF exposure.¹¹⁴ Zhang et al’s meta-analysis supports a connection between ELF-EMFs and cancer risk, particularly in the United States and residentially exposed populations. However, methodological challenges may have contributed to variations in findings among studies.¹¹⁵ Baldi et al linked exposure to ELF-EMF, whether residential or occupational, to meningioma development.¹¹⁶ Carles et al’s study on adults in France revealed significant associations between living near high voltage lines and the incidence of brain tumors, particularly glioma.¹¹⁷ Turner et al’s investigation did not yield conclusive evidence of associations between occupational ELF-EMF exposure and risk of glioma or meningioma. They recommend further research with more refined estimates of occupational exposures.¹¹⁸

Ahlbom et al undertook an extensive pooled analysis, utilizing individual data from nine studies, which encompassed regular ELF-EMR exposure measurement. Their results unveiled that 99.2% of children residing in households with exposure levels below 0.4 μT exhibited a lower risk of developing childhood leukemia. In contrast, 0.8% of children exposed to 0.4 μT or higher displayed relatively elevated risk estimates, indicating a likelihood beyond random variability. While the precise etiology of this increased risk remained undisclosed, it is plausible that selection bias might have contributed to a certain extent.¹⁰⁵

Mezei et al performed a comprehensive meta-analysis

of studies examining the potential connection between ELF-EMF exposure and the occurrence of childhood brain tumors. Their analysis aimed to evaluate result consistency and explore potential factors contributing to variations among studies. Their investigation revealed that, overall, there was no compelling evidence to support an increased risk of childhood brain tumors associated with diverse exposure intensities. However, their findings did indicate a moderate risk increase for exposures exceeding 0.3 or 0.4 μT.¹¹⁹ Kheifets et al conducted a consolidated analysis employing primary data from ten studies carried out between 1960 and 2001. Their primary focus was to investigate the potential relationship between the incidence of childhood brain tumors and ELF-EMF exposure. The results yielded limited evidence supporting a link between ELF-EMF exposure and the occurrence of childhood brain tumors. Turner and colleagues conducted an investigation into the potential connection between ELF-EMF and the occurrence of brain tumors within the extensive INTEROCC study. Their findings unveiled a positive correlation between exposure to ELF-EMF and the development of glioma.¹²⁰

Coble et al studied the link between exposure to ELF-EMF at work and the risk of developing glioma and meningioma. The study included 489 glioma cases, 197 meningioma cases, and 799 control subjects. The analysis did not show significant associations between occupational MF exposure and an increased risk of glioma or meningioma.¹²¹ In a separate study, Waseem Khan et al investigated the incidence of adult hematological malignancies and brain tumors in relation to residential exposure to ELF-EMF. Interestingly, their results suggested a decreased risk rather than an increased risk for most hematological neoplasms associated with such exposure.¹²²

While researchers are still debating whether exposure to ELF-EMF may have carcinogenic effects or not, several scientists are claiming that ELF-EMF could prove useful in treating cancers and brain tumors.¹²³ Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis, characterized by a median survival rate of just 12 months. Temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating agent, is widely used in cancer treatment, but the frequent emergence of resistance to this drug poses a significant challenge. One approach to overcoming this resistance is by combining TMZ with EMF therapy. Many studies have shown that EMF therapy can have a positive impact on cancer cells and the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs.¹²³

Ahmadi-Zeidabadi et al conducted a detailed investigation to evaluate the potential synergistic effect of 100 μM TMZ in combination with EMF (at 100 Hz, and 100 G) on U87 cells, a human glioma cell line. Their study revealed that TMZ not only promotes cell death but also induces the differentiation of cancer cells. Moreover, their data confirmed that ELF-EMF significantly enhances the effects of TMZ on U87 cells afflicted with glioblastoma.¹²³

In a separate study, Akbarnejad et al examined the effects of exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Pulsed (ELF-PEMFs) at varying frequencies and amplitudes on the cell cycle, apoptosis, and viability of the Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) cell line (U87) in a laboratory setting. Their findings suggest that the proliferation and apoptosis of human GBM cells are indeed influenced by exposure to ELF-PEMFs, with effects varying depending on the frequency and amplitude in a time-dependent manner. It is important to note that specific ELF-PEMF frequencies and amplitudes appear to promote the proliferation of U87 cells, warranting caution in the application of medical devices associated with magnetic fields in the context of cancer treatment. Conversely, certain other ELF-PEMF frequencies and intensities hinder U87 cell growth, potentially paving the way for innovative therapeutic strategies.¹²⁴

ELF-EMF exposure has come under investigation due to its potential link with neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD and PD. The pioneering study examining the impact of ELF-EMF exposure on neurodegenerative diseases was carried out by Sobel and colleagues.¹²⁵ Their research findings revealed a noteworthy connection between occupational exposure to moderate or high levels of ELF-EMF and an elevated risk of AD.¹²⁵ Vergara et al conducted a study that entailed an analysis of the connection between occupational exposure to ELF-EMF and neurodegenerative diseases, with a particular focus on AD and motor neuron diseases (MNDs). Their approach involved a comprehensive meta-analysis encompassing various relevant studies.¹²⁶ The results suggested an absence of solid evidence to substantiate ELF-EMR exposure as the causative factor in the correlation between occupational titles and MND.¹²⁶ It was also found that most studies suffered from disease misclassification, particularly in the case of AD, and imprecise exposure assessment.¹²⁶ Jalilian et al conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of the available literature to evaluate the risk of AD in individuals exposed to ELF-EMF.¹²⁷ Their findings indicated a potential association between occupational ELF-EMF exposure and an increased risk of AD.¹²⁷ They recommended, however, that these results should be interpreted with caution, given the presence of "moderate to high heterogeneity and potential publication bias" in the studies.¹²⁷ Davanipour et al conducted an inquiry into the plausible connection between occupational exposure to ELF-EMF and AD. As per their findings, there was an observed association between occupational ELF-EMF exposure and an elevated risk of AD.¹²⁸ Huss et al undertook a study to explore the potential relationship between exposure to ELF-EMF emanating from power lines and mortality rates linked to neurological disorders.¹²⁹ Obtained results indicate that residing in close proximity to power lines and experiencing

residential ELF-EMF exposure might conceivably increase the risk of developing conditions such as ALS, PD, or multiple sclerosis (MS).¹²⁹ However, it's essential to note that the available evidence to substantiate this assertion remains limited.¹²⁹

After conducting a comprehensive case-control study, Van der Mark et al determined that there was no observed association between PD and exposure to ELF-EMF, electrical shocks, or employment in electrical occupations.¹³⁰ Although some studies have suggested that ELF-EMFs may have a protective effect against neurodegenerative diseases, pieces of evidence are not strong enough to support this claim.¹³⁰ After conducting a meta-analysis led by Huss et al, no compelling evidence supporting a relationship between exposure to ELF-EMF and an elevated risk of PD was identified.¹³¹ However, Koeman et al discovered that occupational risk factors, such as ELF-EMF exposure, elevate the ALS risk.¹³²

Reale et al subjected neuron-like SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells to ELF-EMF at 50 Hz and 1 mT. Their observations revealed that these cells exhibited responses to ELF-EMF exposure, managing a delicate equilibrium between the generation and removal of reactive oxygen species. Additionally, they noted alterations in the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which are closely linked to oxidative stress.¹³³ Nonetheless, following exposure to 1 mT ELF-EMF, the study did identify an elevation in the 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid/5-hydroxytryptamine ratio. However, the matrix metalloproteinases, which hold significant roles in neuronal cell death, did not display substantial changes. Consequently, the available evidence does not establish a definitive positive correlation between ELF-EMF exposure and the process of neurodegeneration.¹³³

Consales et al conducted an investigation with the objective of ascertaining whether miRs-34 played a role in mediating gene expression in neuronal responses to a 50 Hz at 1 mT of ELF-EMF in an in vitro setting. The study revealed that ELF-EMF exposure led to a reduction in the expression of miR-34b/c, and this reduction occurred independently of ELF-EMF-induced oxidative stress. However, miRs-34 were recognized as pivotal regulators in the production of reactive oxygen species and the induction of mitochondrial oxidative stress. Additionally, ELF-EMF influenced the expression of α-synuclein by directly targeting it via miR-34 and inducing oxidative stress. Exposure to ELF-EMF has the potential to perturb redox homeostasis and the epigenetic regulation of gene expression in vitro, resulting in adverse effects and neuronal degeneration.¹³⁴

One possible cause of AD may be the reduced function of melatonin (MLT), a hormone that regulates sleep and wake cycles. ELF-EMF exposure may decrease MLT production and promote carcinogenesis.¹³⁵ Kolbabová et al measured salivary MLT levels in cattle exposed to 50 Hz ELF-EMF and observed decreased MLT secretion in winter but an increased MLT secretion in summer. The influence of exposure to ELF-EMF on MLT synthesis might exhibit season-dependent patterns and could be mediated through its impact on serotonin metabolism.¹³⁵

In a study by Del Giudice et al, the impact of exposure to ELF-EMF on amyloidogenic processes was investigated. The researchers examined the impact of exposing H4 neuroglioma cells, which had been genetically modified to stably overexpress human mutant amyloid precursor protein, to ELF-EMF at 3.1 mT and 50 Hz. The results showed that prolonged exposure to ELF-EMF overnight results in a significant increase in the secretion of amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ), specifically the Aβ(1–42) isoform. These findings point towards a potential connection between ELF-EMF exposure and amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing in the brain, as it seems to promote Aβ secretion in an in vitro environment.¹³⁶

Maes et al conducted a laboratory cytogenetic study in vitro to explore the potential link between exposure to ELF-EMF and AD. Their investigation was grounded in the resemblances noted between cells from AD patients and cells subjected to ELF-EMF exposure. They observed that exposure to ELF-EMF at intensities exceeding 50 μT might induce chromosome instabilities akin to those identified in cells from AD patients.¹³⁷

Consales et al undertook a study to investigate the impact of 50 Hz ELF-EMF exposure on an in vitro model of familial ALS (fALS). The study's findings indicated that exposure to 50 Hz ELF-EMF did not induce any notable alterations in cell proliferation or viability. Moreover, the exposure did not affect the levels of intracellular superoxide and H₂O₂. However, the study suggested that the exposure may lead to a significant disruption in the expression of iron-related genes, such as IRP1, MFRN1, and TfR1. Therefore, it can be concluded that iron homeostasis may experience an alteration when exposed to 50 Hz ELF-EMF in the in vitro SOD1ᴳ⁹³ᴬ ALS model.¹³⁸

Akbarnejad et al utilized a solenoid coil to investigate the effect of 50 Hz ELF-EMF with a magnetic intensity of 10 mT and exposure duration of 1 hour/day for 40 days on Wistar rat brains.¹³⁹ They concluded that exposure to ELF-EMF may improve cognitive disorder symptoms in subjects with AD and disrupt the AD process in rat models.¹³⁹ Karimi et al exposed Wistar rats to 50 Hz ELF-EMF with a magnetic intensity of 2000 μT for a duration of 2 hours/day for 28 days.¹⁴⁰ They demonstrated that ELF-EMF exposure might improve memory retention but may serve as a factor in developing anxious states or oxidative stress compared to unexposed rats.¹⁴⁰ Kazemi et al have suggested that exposing Wrhesus macaquesistar monkeys to ELF-EMF with 12 Hz frequency and 0.7 μT magnetic intensity for 4 hours/day for 30 days may improve visual memory and, consequently, enhance general memory,

which is sought to be caused by a decrease in GR genes expression and plasma cortisol.¹⁴¹ Also, in a similar study, Kazemi et al exposed Wrhesus macaques/Star monkeys to 12 Hz ELF-EMF and magnetic intensity of 0.7 μT for 4 hours/day for 30 days.¹⁴² Based on the findings, 12 Hz ELF-EMF exposure may increase scores of visual working memory (VWM), which translates to improvement in memory. This result was attributed to elevated plasma MLT levels or enhanced expression of NMDA glutamate receptors.¹⁴²

Sakhaie et al utilized two solenoid coils connected to alternating power generators, as shown in Fig. 4, to subject BALB/c rats at a 1 mT magnetic field for 6 hours/day for 6 days. Western blot and immunohistochemistry were utilized to assess rats' neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation in the hippocampus. They also assessed rats' spatial memory and learning and concluded that ELF-EMF may potentially benefit the treatment of neurodegenerative conditions, promoting this ELF-EMF as a new therapeutic approach in regenerative medicine.¹⁴³

Gao et al examined the effects of ELF-EMF on rat brain hippocampus by employing a Helmholtz chamber, as shown in Fig. 5, to produce varying magnetic fields with 50 Hz frequency and 1 mT magnetic intensity.¹⁴⁴ They subjected Sprague-Dawley rats to the ELF-EMF exposure for 2 hours/day for 28 days, and they concluded that the neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the exposed rats diagnosed with cerebral ischemia was improved in comparison with un-exposed animals, possibly caused by influencing the Notch signaling pathway.¹⁴⁴ Mahdavi et al exposed male Wistar rats to 1 Hz and 5 Hz ELF-EMF and 0.1 mT magnetic flux densities utilizing solenoid coils, and they demonstrated that ELF-EMF might have different impacts on anxiety, metabolic processes, and hormonal behaviors, emphasizing on the time of exposure which may influence stress system.¹⁴⁵ In a study, Fu et al exposed male adult Wistar rats to 25 Hz and 50 Hz ELF-EMF for seven days as short-term and 25 days as long-term.¹⁴⁶ Based on their results, ELF-EMF could negatively affect spatial recognition memory. The extent of this impact was correlated with the magnetic intensity and duration of exposure to the fields.¹⁴⁶

Recently, Burman et al investigated the effect of ELF-EMF on rat nervous systems by exposing C57BL/6NCrl and BALB/cAnNCrl rats to the spectrum of 5-100 Hz electric field with a power of 8.56 V/m r.m.s (on-state) and 4.99 V/m r.m.s (off-state) for 20 min/day, 25 days in phase one, and 60 min/day for 120 days in phase two.¹⁴⁷ No significant effects on the behavior or well-being of the subject were reported.¹⁴⁷ Further investigations on RF-EMR and ELF-EMF exposure effects on the rat and monkey CNS are summarized in Table 1.

In today's world, electronic devices have become an integral part of modern society, with a significant increase in the demand for wireless communication technologies like smartphones. RF-EMR and ELF-EMF exposure exhibit positive, negative, and neutral effects, depending highly on EMF strengths, operational frequencies, and exposure times. Studies exploring the effects of electric, magnetic, and EMF on various biological processes have presented contradictory results. Although several investigations have indicated that RF-EMR may have carcinogenic effects, studying the epidemiology of neurodegenerative diseases is substantially more complicated than oncological diseases due to the complexities arising from non-specific symptoms. Multiple studies have reported adverse effects of RF-EMR exposure, including memory issues, learning issues, anxiety, impaired brain development, sleep problems, vertigo, tremors, and headaches for humans and animals. Based on various studies conducted on neurodegenerative diseases and hypotheses proposed by researchers, there are indications of a possible link between RF-EMR and the process of neurodegeneration. Many investigators affirmed that RF-EMR exposure could negatively affect the nervous system by influencing the antioxidant defense system, BBB permeability, neurotransmitter levels, neuronal calcium channels, structural properties of myelin proteins, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) related pathways, and metabolic processes. However, there is also evidence that RF-EMR exposure may be helpful for cognitive

| Source | Freq.               | Instrument                                                           | Dose                 | Exp. duration                            | Animal              | Evaluation methods            | Outcomes                                                                                | Ref. |
| ------ | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- |
|        | 900 MHz             | Signal generator and dipole antenna – implanted electrode arrays     | 8 dBm                | 3 h/d for 6 days – continues for 4 weeks | Wistar rats         | TMT
EI                    | -Short-term exposure to RF-EMR may lead to temporary changes in brain function.                                                                                | 148  |
|        | 2.45 GHz            | Wi-Fi router                                                         | 0.0032 mW/cm²        | 2 h/d for 45 days                        | Sprague Dawley rats | PAT
RMT
ES            | -Positive impact on learning, memory, and LTP induction
-Reducing the cell loss without affecting the BST                                                                                | 149  |
|        | 916 MHz             | Microwave generator and monopole antenna – Implanted electrode array | 10 W/m²              | 6 h/d for 5 days                         | Wistar rats         | MWM
HPNA
OORT         | -Impacts on learning ability and memory
-Subjects were capable of adapting to long-term EMF exposure.                                                                                | 150  |
|        | 900 MHz             | UHF oscillator and half-wave dipole antenna                          | 300 mW               | 1 h/d for 25 days                        | Sprague Dawley rat  | HPNA
SLMA
LA          | Exposure in early and mid-adolescence does not alter memory, learning, or locomotor behavior.                                                                                | 151  |
| RF-EMR | 1.5 and 2.856 GHz   | Microwave sources                                                    | 10 mW/cm²            | 6 min                                    | Wistar rat          | MWM
EEG
GEA           | -Reduced spatial memory
- Attributed to cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) related pathways                                                                                | 152  |
|        | 1.5 GHz             | Microwaves transmitted through the rectangular waveguide             | 5, 30, and 50 mW/cm² | 6 min                                    | Wistar rat          | SLMA
HPNA
GEA
EEG | -Spatial memory dysfunction
-Changes in hippocampal structure
-Protein level alteration                                                                                | 153  |
|        | 2.856 and 9.375 GHz | Microwave sources                                                    | 10 mW/cm²            | 6 m/d and 5 d/w for 6 weeks              | Wistar rat          | SLMA
PNA
GEA
BPHA | -Varying degrees of impairment in spatial learning and memory
- Disturbances in EEG
-Damage in the hippocampus structure
-Cognitive impairment and damage to the hippocampal tissue   | 154  |
|        | 1.5 and 4.3 GHz     | Microwaves transmitted through the rectangular waveguide             | 10 mW/cm²            | 6 min                                    | Wistar rat          | MWM
EEG
HPNA
BPA  | -Caused more serious injuries for combined radiation with both frequencies
-Microwave frequency did not impact the damaging effects.                                                          | 64   |

BioImpacts. 2024;14(4):30064

| Source | Freq. | Instrument | Dose | Exp. duration | Animal | Evaluation methods | Outcomes | Ref. |
|--------|-------|------------|------|---------------|--------|---------------------|-----------|-----|
|        | 50 Hz | Helmholtz coil | 1 mT | 2 h/d for 28 days | Sprague Dawley rats | MWM GEA HPNA | Enhancing neurogenesis of the hippocampus in rats with cerebral ischemia. Influencing the Notch signaling pathway. | 144 |
|        | 50 Hz | Helmholtz coil | 250-500 μT | 15 hours (short-term), 15 h/d for 4 days (long-term) | Wistar rats | Electrophysiological recording on slices | Noteworthy impacts on synaptic activity. Changes depend on synaptic structure, neuronal network, and ELF-EMF parameters. | 155 |
|        | 50 Hz | Solenoid coil | 1 mT | 3.5 h/d for 6 days | C57BL/6 rats | BrdU injection – IFA NOR – MWM | Improved survival of newborn neurons. Enhanced spatial learning and memory. | 156 |
| ELF-EMF | 12 Hz | Variable magnetic field generator | 0.7 μT | 4 h/d for 30 days | Rhesus macaque monkeys | VL VM VWM | Affected VL and VWM. Enhanced cognitive abilities of monkeys. | 157 |
|        | 100 Hz | Magnetotherapy device | 10 mT | 1 h | Wistar rats | OORT MWM ES | Potential therapy to help with learning and memory deficits caused by seizures. | 158 |
|        | 50 Hz | Solenoid coil | 1 mT | 6 h/d for 6 days | BALB/c rats | MWM IHC WB | Potential benefit for neurodegenerative conditions. A new therapeutic approach in regenerative medicine. | 143 |

Abbreviations: 2-VO, Two-vessel occlusion; BPHA, Blood-plasma and hormone assays; BST, Basal synaptic transmission; EEG, Electroencephalography; EI, Electrode implantation; EPW, Elevated plus maze test; ES, Electrophysiological examination; FWUA, Food and water utilization analysis; GEA, Gene expression assays; HPNA, Hippocampal physical, physiological and neurological analysis; LA, Locomotor analysis; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; IFA, Immunofluorescence assay; MWM, Morris water maze; OORT, Open-field and object recognition test; PAT, Passive avoidance test; PSM, Physical and structural status monitoring; RMT, Radial arm maze test; SLMA, Spatial learning and memory analysis; SPA, Synaptic plasticity analysis; TMT, T-maze task; VL, Visual learning; VM, Visual memory; VWM, Visual working memory; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; WB, Western blot.

√ RF-EMR exposure may affect CNS functionality, causing amnesia, sleep disorders, headaches, tremors, anxiety, and vertigo.

√ ELF-EMF exposure may impose alterations in brain functionalities.

√ RF-EMR exposure may adversely affect the nervous system by affecting BBB permeability, neurotransmitters, and neuronal calcium channels.

√ RF-EMR exposure may affect myelin sheath structure, CREB-related pathways, and antioxidant defense system.

√ ELF-EMF exposure may enhance animal learning and memory abilities and mitigate neurodegenerative disorders.

√ ELF-EMF exposure may induce stress-like behaviors and oxidative stress and cause hormonal alterations in rats.

√ ELF-EMF exposure may influence the brain's hippocampal function, expression of GR genes, NMDA glutamate receptors, and notch signaling pathways.

√ ELF-EMF exposure may alter spatial memory, antioxidant defense system, learning abilities, and synaptic activity.

and transparently communicating related information to the public is essential as a preventative measure.

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the Laser and Plasma Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran, for their kind and precious support.

Conceptualization: Mohammad Ismail Zibaii.

Supervision: Mohammad Ismail Zibaii.

Writing–original draft: Ramin Eskandani.

Writing–review and editing: Mohammad Ismail Zibaii.

Not applicable.

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

No funding source was required.

On the other hand, studies indicate that ELF-EMF exposure can enhance learning and memory abilities in rats and mitigate neurodegenerative disorders. However, ELF-EMF exposure may induce stress-like behaviors and oxidative stress in rats. Still, ELF-EMF may influence the brain’s hippocampal function, expression of GR genes, NMDA glutamate receptors, notch signaling pathways, spatial memory, synaptic activity, hormonal alterations, antioxidant defense system, and learning abilities. Despite these findings, the potential biological effects of EMF exposure are yet to be well established. Last but not least, when developing an EMF-based apparatus, it’s crucial to consider the health implications of specific frequencies. Further research is necessary to establish safety standards that strike a balance between the positive and negative effects. Adhering to international standards

disorders. Concerns regarding brain development issues caused by RF exposure are also substantial. Our understanding of how RF-EMR affects the human brain is incomplete, and there is also insufficient evidence about their impact on peripheral neurological functions. Although some individuals exposed to RF-EMR may experience dysesthesia, studying nerve conduction in laboratory settings for this condition is challenging. In addition, various studies conducted on animals, cells, and epidemiological data suggest that fetuses, infants, children, and adolescents, whose central nervous systems are still developing and whose neuronal connections are still forming, may be more susceptible to the adverse effects of EMFs and demyelination.

1. Takebayashi T, Varsier N, Kikuchi Y, Wake K, Taki M, Watanabe S, et al. Mobile phone use, exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field, and brain tumour: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 652-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604214

2. Jimenez H, Blackman C, Lesser G, Debinski W, Chan M, Sharma S, et al. Use of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields for the treatment of cancer. Front Biosci 2018; 23: 284-97. https://doi.org/10.2741/4591

3. Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J Chem Neuroanat 2016; 75: 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001

4. Sage C, Burgio E. Electromagnetic fields, pulsed radiofrequency radiation, and epigenetics: how wireless technologies may affect childhood development. Child Dev 2018; 89: 129-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12824

5. Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, Van Deventer E. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields. Pediatrics 2005; 116: e303-e13. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2541

6. Narayanan SN, Jetti R, Kesari KK, Kumar RS, Nayak SB, Bhat PG. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced behavioral changes and their possible basis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2019; 26: 30693-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06278-5

7. Stam R. Electromagnetic fields and the blood–brain barrier. Brain Res Rev 2010; 65: 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001

8. Schirmacher A, Winters S, Fischer S, Goeke J, Galla HJ, Kullnick U, et al. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz) increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood–brain barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21: 338-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-186X(200007)21:5<338::AID-BEM2>3.0.CO;2-Q

9. Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Salford LG. Increased blood–brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. Pathophysiology 2009; 16: 103-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.001

10. Kuribayashi M, Wang J, Fujiwara O, Doi Y, Nabae K, Tamano S, et al. Lack of effects of 1439 MHz electromagnetic near field exposure on the blood–brain barrier in immature and young rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26: 578-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20138

11. Sutton CH, Carroll FB. Effects of microwave‐induced hyperthermia on the blood‐brain barrier of the rat. Radio Sci 1979; 14: 329-34. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS014i06Sp00329

12. Oscar KJ, Hawkins TD. Microwave alteration of the blood-brain barrier system of rats. Brain Res 1977; 126: 281-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(77)90726-0

13. D'Andrea JA, Chou C, Johnston SA, Adair ER. Microwave effects on the nervous system. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24: S107-S47. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10179

14. Fritze K, Sommer C, Schmitz B, Mies G, Hossmann K-A, Kiessling M, et al. Effect of global system for mobile communication (GSM) microwave exposure on blood-brain barrier permeability in rat. Acta Neuropathol 1997; 94: 465-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010050734

15. Sırav B, Seyhan N. Effects of GSM modulated radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation on permeability of blood–brain barrier in male & female rats. J Chem Neuroanat 2016; 75: 123-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.12.010

16. Al-Sarraf H, Philip L. Effect of hypertension on the integrity of blood brain and blood CSF barriers, cerebral blood flow and CSF secretion in the rat. Brain Res 2003; 975: 179-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02632-5

17. Danker-Hopfe H, Dorn H, Bolz T, Peter A, Hansen M-L, Eggert T, et al. Effects of mobile phone exposure (GSM 900 and WCDMA/UMTS) on polysomnography based sleep quality: An intra-and inter-individual perspective. Environ Res 2016; 145: 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.011

18. Braune S, Wrocklage C, Raczek J, Gailus T, Lücking C. Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field. Lancet 1998; 351: 1857-8. https://doi.

org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)24025-6

51. Frey AH. Headaches from cellular telephones: are they real and what are the implications? Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106: 101-3. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106101

52. Schmid MR, Loughran SP, Regel SJ, Murbach M, Bratic Grunauer A, Rusterholz T, et al. Sleep EEG alterations: effects of different pulse‐modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fields. J Sleep Res 2012; 21: 50-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00918.x

53. Repacholi MH, Lerchl A, Röösli M, Sienkiewicz Z, Auvinen A, Breckenkamp J, et al. Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors. Bioelectromagnetics 2012; 33: 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20716

54. Wang B, Lai H. Acute exposure to pulsed 2450‐MHz microwaves affects water‐maze performance of rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21: 52-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(200001)21:1<52::aid-bem8>3.3.co;2-y

55. Cassel J-C, Cosquer B, Galani R, Kuster N. Whole-body exposure to 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields does not alter radial-maze performance in rats. Behav Brain Res 2004; 155: 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.03.031

56. Son Y, Kim JS, Jeong YJ, Jeong YK, Kwon JH, Choi H-D, et al. Long-term RF exposure on behavior and cerebral glucose metabolism in 5xFAD mice. Neurosci Lett 2018; 666: 64-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.042

57. Dubreuil D, Jay T, Edeline J-M. Head-only exposure to GSM 900-MHz electromagnetic fields does not alter rat's memory in spatial and non-spatial tasks. Behav Brain Res 2003; 145: 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00100-1

58. Hossmann KA, Hermann D. Effects of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones on the central nervous system. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24: 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10068

59. Yamaguchi H, Tsurita G, Ueno S, Watanabe S, Wake K, Taki M, et al. 1439 MHz pulsed TDMA fields affect performance of rats in a T‐maze task only when body temperature is elevated. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24: 223-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10099

60. Ammari M, Jeljeli M, Maaroufi K, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, Roy V. Static magnetic field exposure affects behavior and learning in rats. Electromagn Biol Med 2008; 27: 185-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370802072158

61. Tattersall JE, Scott IR, Wood SJ, Nettell JJ, Bevir MK, Wang Z, et al. Effects of low intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on electrical activity in rat hippocampal slices. Brain Res 2001; 904: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02434-9

62. Xu S, Ning W, Xu Z, Zhou S, Chiang H, Luo J. Chronic exposure to GSM 1800-MHz microwaves reduces excitatory synaptic activity in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 2006; 398: 253-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.004

63. Kumlin T, Iivonen H, Miettinen P, Juvonen A, van Groen T, Puranen L, et al. Mobile phone radiation and the developing brain: behavioral and morphological effects in juvenile rats. Radiat Res 2007; 168: 471-9. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR1002.1

64. Zhu R, Wang H, Xu X, Zhao L, Zhang J, Dong J, et al. Effects of 1.5 and 4.3 GHz microwave radiation on cognitive function and hippocampal tissue structure in Wistar rats. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 10061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89348-4

65. Ayeni EA, Aldossary AM, Ayejoto DA, Gbadegesin LA, Alshehri AA, Alfassam HA, et al. Neurodegenerative Diseases: Implications of Environmental and Climatic Influences on Neurotransmitters and Neuronal Hormones Activities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 12495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912495

66. Sheffler ZM, Reddy V, Pillarisetty LS. Physiology, neurotransmitters: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2019.

67. Goodman LS, Gilman A. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics: The Macmillan; 1955. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm020026w

68. Ezz HA, Khadrawy Y, Ahmed N, Radwan N, Bakry ME. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone on the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters in four different areas of rat brain. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013; 17.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.691880

69. Maaroufi K, Had-Aissouni L, Melon C, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, Poucet B, et al. Spatial learning, monoamines and oxidative stress in rats exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic field in combination with iron overload. Behav Brain Res 2014; 258: 80-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.016

70. Kim JH, Lee C-H, Kim H-G, Kim HR. Decreased dopamine in striatum and difficult locomotor recovery from MPTP insult after exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37874-z

71. Silverberg AB, Shah SD, Haymond MW, Cryer PE. Norepinephrine: hormone and neurotransmitter in man. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 1978; 234: E252. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1978.234.3.E252

72. Megha K, Deshmukh PS, Ravi AK, Tripathi AK, Abegaonkar MP, Banerjee BD. Effect of low-intensity microwave radiation on monoamine neurotransmitters and their key regulating enzymes in rat brain. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015; 73: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0576-x

73. Cao Z, Zhang H, Tao Y, Liu J. Effects of microwave radiation on lipid peroxidation and the content of neurotransmitters in mice. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2000; 29: 28-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.691880

74. Kaplan S, Deniz OG, Önger ME, Türkmen AP, Yurt KK, Aydın I, et al. Electromagnetic field and brain development. J Chem Neuroanat 2016; 75: 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.11.005

75. Gye MC, Park CJ. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012; 39: 1. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1

76. Gilgun-Sherki Y, Melamed E, Offen D. Oxidative stress induced-neurodegenerative diseases: the need for antioxidants that penetrate the blood brain barrier. Neuropharmacology 2001; 40: 959-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3

77. Scaiano J, Mohtat N, Cozens F, McLean J, Thansandote A. Application of the radical pair mechanism to free radicals in organized systems: can the effects of 60 Hz be predicted from studies under static fields? Bioelectromagnetics 1994; 15: 549-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250150608

78. Schuermann D, Mevissen M. Manmade electromagnetic fields and oxidative stress—biological effects and consequences for health. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073772

79. Meral I, Mert H, Mert N, Deger Y, Yoruk I, Yetkin A, et al. Effects of 900-MHz electromagnetic field emitted from cellular phone on brain oxidative stress and some vitamin levels of guinea pigs. Brain Res 2007; 1169: 120-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.015

80. Kıvrak EG, Yurt KK, Kaplan AA, Alkan I, Altun G. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2017; 5: 167-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003

81. Warille AA, Altun G, Elamin AA, Kaplan AA, Mohamed H, Yurt KK, et al. Skeptical approaches concerning the effect of exposure to electromagnetic fields on brain hormones and enzyme activities. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2017; 5: 177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2017.09.002

82. Ozturk A, Baltaci AK, Mogulkoc R, Öztekin E. Zinc prevention of electromagnetically induced damage to rat testicle and kidney tissues. Biol Trace Elem Res 2003; 96: 247-54. https://doi.org/10.1385/BTER:96:1-3:247

83. Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006; 30: 718-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.001

84. Jiang D-p, Li J, Zhang J, Xu S-l, Kuang F, Lang H-y, et al. Electromagnetic pulse exposure induces overexpression of beta amyloid protein in rats. Arch Med Res 2013; 44: 178-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.03.005

85. Terro F, Magnaudeix A, Crochetet M, Martin L, Bourthoumieu S, Wilson C-M, et al. GSM-900 MHz at low dose temperature-dependently downregulates α-synuclein in cultured cerebral cells.

BioImpacts. 2024;14(4):30064

independently of chaperone-mediated-autophagy. Toxicology 2012; 292: 136-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2011.12.003

org/10.1002/jic.25765

Eskandani and Zibaii

stress hormones in male Wistar rats. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2014; 22: 570. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2014.054

146. Fu Y, Wang C, Wang J, Lei Y, Ma Y. Long-term exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields impairs spatial recognition memory in mice. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2008; 35: 797-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04922.x

147. Burman O, Marsella G, Di Clemente A, Cervo L. The effect of exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) as an integral part of the housing system on anxiety-related behaviour, cognition and welfare in two strains of laboratory mouse. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0197054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197054

148. Tafakori S, Farrokhi A, Shalchyan V, Daliri MR. Investigating the impact of mobile range electromagnetic radiation on the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat during working memory. Behav Brain Res 2020; 391: 112703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112703

149. Bayat M, Karimi N, Karami M, Haghighi AB, Bayat K, Akbari S, et al. Chronic exposure to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation improves cognition and synaptic plasticity impairment in vascular dementia model. Int J Neurosci 2023; 133: 111-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2021.1896502

150. Hao D, Yang L, Chen S, Tong J, Tian Y, Su B, et al. Effects of long-term electromagnetic field exposure on spatial learning and memory in rats. Neurol Sci 2013; 34: 157-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-0970-8

151. Keleş Aİ, Yıldırım M, Gedikli Ö, Çolakoğlu S, Kaya H, Baş O, et al. The effects of a continuous 1-h a day 900-MHz electromagnetic field applied throughout early and mid-adolescence on hippocampus morphology and learning behavior in late adolescent male rats. J Chem Neuroanat 2018; 94: 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.08.006

152. Tan S, Wang H, Xu X, Zhao L, Zhang J, Dong J, et al. Acute effects of 2.856 GHz and 1.5 GHz microwaves on spatial memory abilities and CREB-related pathways. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 12348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91622-4

153. Wang H, Song L, Zhao L, Wang H, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The dose-dependent effect of 1.5-GHz microwave exposure on spatial memory and the NMDAR pathway in Wistar rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2023; 30: 37427-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24850-4

154. Wang H, Liu Y, Sun Y, Dong J, Xu X, Wang H, et al. Changes in cognitive function, synaptic structure and protein expression after long-term exposure to 2.856 and 9.375 GHz microwaves. Cell Commun Signal 2023; 21: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-022-01011-1

155. Varró P, Szemerszky R, Bárdos G, Világi I. Changes in synaptic efficacy and seizure susceptibility in rat brain slices following extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Bioelectromagnetics 2009; 30: 631-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20517

156. Podda MV, Leone L, Barbati SA, Mastrodonato A, Li Puma DD, Piacentini R, et al. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields enhance the survival of newborn neurons in the mouse hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 2014; 39: 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12465

157. Kazemi M, Aliyari H, Golabi S, Tekieh E, Tavakoli H, Saberi M, et al. Improvement of Cognitive Indicators in Male Monkeys Exposed to Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Arch Razi Inst 2022; 77: 503. https://doi.org/10.22092/ari.2020.352384.1560

158. Khajei S, Mirnajafi-Zadeh J, Sheibani V, Ahmadi-Zeidabadi M, Masoumi-Ardakani Y, Rajizadeh MA, et al. Electromagnetic field protects against cognitive and synaptic plasticity impairment induced by electrical kindling in rats. Brain Res Bull 2021; 171: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.03.013

18 | BioImpacts. 2024;14(4):30064