<p>Yes. the emissions from a pulsar do interact with interstellar medium - this effect is called dispersion. When the emission from the pulsar hits free electrons (and dust) in the interstellar medium, different frequencies in the pulse become "delayed" by different amounts corresponding to their frequencies - specifically, lower frequencies are delayed more than higher frequencies. So, when we receive the signal from a pulsar in a radio telescope, the pulse is "dispersed", or curved. Software is used to de-disperse these pulses by testing out many different "dispersion measure" values to line up the emissions correctly at different frequencies. You can find that <a href="https://github.com/scottransom/presto" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>. </p>

<p>This is the main way we can be sure the pulses interact with the interstellar medium. Based on how dispersed those pulses are, and how much "stuff" we think the interstellar medium contains, we can get a very basic idea of how far away the pulsar is when we accurately calculate its dispersion measure.</p>

<p>I don't, however, know of any effects like what you referred to with the laser, resulting in an ability to "indirectly" observe pulsars... the pulses themselves are already quite weak and "seeing" a pulsar directly takes a decent amount of time on a telescope along with large amounts of data processing. From my personal experience in the field along with taking many observations on radio telescopes designed to observe pulsars, I highly doubt that the laser-pointer effect you described is observable.</p>

<p>For more details on pulsar dispersion, take a look <a href="http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/P/Pulsar+Dispersion+Measure" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-18T05:14:16.790Z
2020-02-18T05:14:16.790Z
sforsingh
<p>All particles, be they photons or particles with mass, interact to some extent.  It's the magnitude that matters.  The problem, as CYL's answer implies, is that the side-scatter of EM radiation is a tiny fraction of the original energy.  Even in our dense atmosphere, we cannot easily pick up side-scatter from our own directed transmissions (never mind what the NSA can do :-) ) in the absence of major dust storms. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-18T19:42:06.283Z
2020-02-18T19:42:06.283Z
Carl Witthoft
<p>Pulsars are rotating objects that emit a beam in a direction that is not aligned with the axis of rotation. Because of this, we see them as a periodic pulse. If the beam isn't towards us, we don't see it. Since we need to be on the path of the beam to see it and the beam is only a few degrees wide, it is believed that there are many objects that are pulsars, but that we see as ordinary neutron stars (or can't see at all). </p>

<p>Does the beam from a neutron star interact with the surrounding medium in such a way that we might see the result of this interaction? The same way you can't see a laser beam, but in a very dusty room, you can see the light from the laser bouncing off of the dust particles, making it possible to indirectly see the beam. </p>

<interstellar-medium><pulsar>
Do pulsar beams interact with the interstellar medium?
usernumber
# Do pulsar beams interact with the interstellar medium?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-02-17)

Pulsars are rotating objects that emit a beam in a direction that is not aligned with the axis of rotation. Because of this, we see them as a periodic pulse. If the beam isn't towards us, we don't see it. Since we need to be on the path of the beam to see it and the beam is only a few degrees wide, it is believed that there are many objects that are pulsars, but that we see as ordinary neutron stars (or can't see at all).

Does the beam from a neutron star interact with the surrounding medium in such a way that we might see the result of this interaction? The same way you can't see a laser beam, but in a very dusty room, you can see the light from the laser bouncing off of the dust particles, making it possible to indirectly see the beam.

**Tags:** interstellar-medium, pulsar

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-02-18. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Yes. the emissions from a pulsar do interact with interstellar medium - this effect is called dispersion. When the emission from the pulsar hits free electrons (and dust) in the interstellar medium, different frequencies in the pulse become "delayed" by different amounts corresponding to their frequencies - specifically, lower frequencies are delayed more than higher frequencies. So, when we receive the signal from a pulsar in a radio telescope, the pulse is "dispersed", or curved. Software is used to de-disperse these pulses by testing out many different "dispersion measure" values to line up the emissions correctly at different frequencies. You can find that [here](https://github.com/scottransom/presto).

This is the main way we can be sure the pulses interact with the interstellar medium. Based on how dispersed those pulses are, and how much "stuff" we think the interstellar medium contains, we can get a very basic idea of how far away the pulsar is when we accurately calculate its dispersion measure.

I don't, however, know of any effects like what you referred to with the laser, resulting in an ability to "indirectly" observe pulsars... the pulses themselves are already quite weak and "seeing" a pulsar directly takes a decent amount of time on a telescope along with large amounts of data processing. From my personal experience in the field along with taking many observations on radio telescopes designed to observe pulsars, I highly doubt that the laser-pointer effect you described is observable.

For more details on pulsar dispersion, take a look [here](http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/P/Pulsar+Dispersion+Measure).


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-02-18. Score: 0

All particles, be they photons or particles with mass, interact to some extent. It's the magnitude that matters. The problem, as CYL's answer implies, is that the side-scatter of EM radiation is a tiny fraction of the original energy. Even in our dense atmosphere, we cannot easily pick up side-scatter from our own directed transmissions (never mind what the NSA can do :-) ) in the absence of major dust storms.


---

