<p>There are more or less two possibility to get debris in a sufficient amount: collisions and breakup/ejection.</p>

<p><strong>Collisions</strong></p>

<p>This is mostly the case for asteroids. At the point of impact you get a cloud of debris which basically moves as if the colliding bodies combined into a bigger one. However, for small objects, the fragments in the cloud are not gravitationally bound to each other and thus can separate over time. If larger objects survive the initial collision, they can undergo further impacts at different orbital positions leading to the seasonal meteor showers.</p>

<p><strong>Breakup/Ejection</strong></p>

<p>This is mostly the case for comets. Particles get ejected from the original body by heating of the surface, or other effects. This is only possible for small grains, which are massively influenced by stellar radiation pressure. The result is an effectively smaller gravity of the star and thus a different orbit. Being on different orbits, theses particles naturally have to separate.</p>

<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>

<p>In both cases you get a physical separation over time. Being that all of the quantities involved are on a continuum, you effectly have a smeared distribution of fragments over an orbit. Depending on the special case, you can get a distribution over the whole ellipse, but a part of it seems more likely.</p>

<p>EDIT: As you asked about catalogues, I would recommend you looking at <a href="https://www.ta3.sk/IAUC22DB/MDC2007/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.ta3.sk/IAUC22DB/MDC2007/</a> plus at <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006mspc.book.....J" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006mspc.book.....J</a> for a scientific read.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-06T17:48:36.667Z
2019-06-06T17:59:46.313Z
2019-06-06T17:59:46.313Z
jan.sende
<p>Meteor showers occur when Earth passes through debris shed by a comet (if I get that right). Does this mean that the entire orbit of the comet is strewn with debris? I suppose that the debris follows the same orbit as the comet core it was released from as it passed close enough to the Sun for ices of different kinds to sublimate. Is the debris that cause meteor showers somewhat evenly distributed along a huge ellipse crossing the orbits of Earth and (often) Jupiter? </p>

<p>Are such cometary debris streams, and not only those crossing Earth's orbit, somehow cataloged and characterized?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T14:06:51.863Z
Check out the sim linked in [this question](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20597/why-are-these-objects-moving-at-vastly-different-speeds-along-the-same-orbit).
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T14:23:24.687Z
Related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/27301/why-would-the-perseids-meteor-rate-fall-off-after-maximum-faster-than-the-increa & https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/leonid-meteor-showers-and-the-tempel-tuttle-comet
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T14:42:45.430Z
Possible duplicate of [Why would the Perseids meteor rate fall off after maximum faster than the increase before maximum?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/27301/why-would-the-perseids-meteor-rate-fall-off-after-maximum-faster-than-the-increa)
Rory Alsop
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-04T23:04:27.997Z
Cool image here:  https://theboldcorsicanflame.wordpress.com/2015/08/05/earth-is-entering-a-stream-of-debris-from-comet-swift-tuttle-source-of-the-annual-perseid-meteor-shower/  Because orbits repeat, the debris stream stays relatively close together at 1 AU, more spread out further away, but different periods of debris orbit would lend itself to a steady stream.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T01:33:15.693Z
I think this is an interesting question, and the supposed duplicate doesn't really answer it - it simply addresses observations of the *intersection of the debris orbit and Earth orbit*. **I'm voting to leave it open**, as an answer to this specific question (I hope someone can provide one) will add value to our site library.
Chappo Hasn't Forgotten
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T04:58:38.793Z
This is a great question! It should stay open; it is not answered by the related questions.
uhoh
<orbit><comets><meteor-shower>
How uniformly is cometary debris distributed along the entire orbit of the comet?
LocalFluff
# How uniformly is cometary debris distributed along the entire orbit of the comet?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-01-04)

Meteor showers occur when Earth passes through debris shed by a comet (if I get that right). Does this mean that the entire orbit of the comet is strewn with debris? I suppose that the debris follows the same orbit as the comet core it was released from as it passed close enough to the Sun for ices of different kinds to sublimate. Is the debris that cause meteor showers somewhat evenly distributed along a huge ellipse crossing the orbits of Earth and (often) Jupiter?

Are such cometary debris streams, and not only those crossing Earth's orbit, somehow cataloged and characterized?

**Tags:** orbit, comets, meteor-shower
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Check out the sim linked in [this question](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20597/why-are-these-objects-moving-at-vastly-different-speeds-along-the-same-orbit).  
> **username_1**: Related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/27301/why-would-the-perseids-meteor-rate-fall-off-after-maximum-faster-than-the-increa & https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/leonid-meteor-showers-and-the-tempel-tuttle-comet  
> **username_2**: Possible duplicate of [Why would the Perseids meteor rate fall off after maximum faster than the increase before maximum?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/27301/why-would-the-perseids-meteor-rate-fall-off-after-maximum-faster-than-the-increa)  
> **username_3**: Cool image here:  https://theboldcorsicanflame.wordpress.com/2015/08/05/earth-is-entering-a-stream-of-debris-from-comet-swift-tuttle-source-of-the-annual-perseid-meteor-shower/  Because orbits repeat, the debris stream stays relatively close together at 1 AU, more spread out further away, but different periods of debris orbit would lend itself to a steady stream.  
> **username_4**: I think this is an interesting question, and the supposed duplicate doesn't really answer it - it simply addresses observations of the *intersection of the debris orbit and Earth orbit*. **I'm voting to leave it open**, as an answer to this specific question (I hope someone can provide one) will add value to our site library.  
> **username_5**: This is a great question! It should stay open; it is not answered by the related questions.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_6 on 2019-06-06. Score: 2

There are more or less two possibility to get debris in a sufficient amount: collisions and breakup/ejection.

**Collisions**

This is mostly the case for asteroids. At the point of impact you get a cloud of debris which basically moves as if the colliding bodies combined into a bigger one. However, for small objects, the fragments in the cloud are not gravitationally bound to each other and thus can separate over time. If larger objects survive the initial collision, they can undergo further impacts at different orbital positions leading to the seasonal meteor showers.

**Breakup/Ejection**

This is mostly the case for comets. Particles get ejected from the original body by heating of the surface, or other effects. This is only possible for small grains, which are massively influenced by stellar radiation pressure. The result is an effectively smaller gravity of the star and thus a different orbit. Being on different orbits, theses particles naturally have to separate.

**Conclusion**

In both cases you get a physical separation over time. Being that all of the quantities involved are on a continuum, you effectly have a smeared distribution of fragments over an orbit. Depending on the special case, you can get a distribution over the whole ellipse, but a part of it seems more likely.

EDIT: As you asked about catalogues, I would recommend you looking at <https://www.ta3.sk/IAUC22DB/MDC2007/> plus at <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006mspc.book.....J> for a scientific read.


---

