<p>Has there been a moment, where the diameter/radius of the universe in Planck lenghts matched the mass in Planck masses (dark + baryonic)?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-09-14T18:11:06.343Z
Based on current observations, there is no radius or diameter of the entire universe, since it seems to be infinite. However, if we constrain this question to the **observable** universe, we could probably answer it.
Greg Burghardt
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-09-15T17:27:15.637Z
I o wonder how reliable any estimates might be given the extremes of conditions assumptions would have to be made.
Slarty
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-09-15T17:40:21.373Z
It seems that the moment is ahead of us. I want to see, if the Sciama's formula for G works out exactly at some point in time G = c^2/sum(all masses in universe)/radius o universe) = mass/radius of universe = 1/1. It should hold true a few billion years away from now, I just want a confirmation.
Kontrola Faktů
<universe>
Universe: mass = length
Kontrola Faktů
# Universe: mass = length

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-09-14)

Has there been a moment, where the diameter/radius of the universe in Planck lenghts matched the mass in Planck masses (dark + baryonic)?

**Tags:** universe
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Based on current observations, there is no radius or diameter of the entire universe, since it seems to be infinite. However, if we constrain this question to the **observable** universe, we could probably answer it.  
> **username_2**: I o wonder how reliable any estimates might be given the extremes of conditions assumptions would have to be made.  
> **username_0**: It seems that the moment is ahead of us. I want to see, if the Sciama's formula for G works out exactly at some point in time G = c^2/sum(all masses in universe)/radius o universe) = mass/radius of universe = 1/1. It should hold true a few billion years away from now, I just want a confirmation.  

---

## 0 answers

