<p>There are infinite number of points between 0cm and 1cm on your ruler, there are also an infinite number of points between 0cm and 2cm but it is plain that the 2cm gap is twice as big.</p>

<p>This is not an exact parallel (or even a very good inexact one) but is offered to show you that infinity may mean quite a lot of things: for instance what if space were infinite before the big bang but what happened then was that "things" (ie the spacetime metric) became ever further distant from one another - if space was already infinite then this expanded space could not reach a limit.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-11T19:36:13.430Z
2015-09-11T19:36:13.430Z
adrianmcmenamin
<p>I think you're operating under a few false presumptions, the first being that that all infinities are <em>instantaneous</em>, which they are not!</p>

<p>Imagine I told you to start counting at 1:00 PM tomorrow, starting at the number one, and then to keep counting, once a second, until I say stop.</p>

<p>So at 1:00 PM you'd start: 1...2...3...4...</p>

<p>At 1:05 PM you'd be at: 300...301...302...</p>

<p>And at 1:10 PM you'd be at: 600...601..602...</p>

<p>Ok now I tell you to keep counting <em>to infinity</em>, so that you never stop counting! Eventually you'll reach every number you can think of (and even more, since you can always count another second after the one you just got to), but it might take you weeks, or months, or centuries to get to there!</p>

<p>So in that example we had a start, 1, and we're going all the way to infinity (i.e. we'll never stop). In the same way, the universe could start at one time and keep expanding forever (the only difference is that the universe "starts counting" at 0 instead of 1).</p>

<p>But why 0 and not 1? Or 2? Or -356? Or even <em>-infinity</em>? Why did the universe start 13.8 billion years ago? What about the time <em>before</em> the big bang?</p>

<p>This is a very, very tricky question (and one which may never be answered), but most cosmologists will tell you that there was no time before the Big Bang (since there was no space!), and even if there was, we probably wouldn't be able to probe it.</p>

<p>I will suggest you check out Sean Carroll's blog with a few great explanations to these kind of questions:</p>

<p><a href="http://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/cosmologyprimer/faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/cosmologyprimer/faq.html</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-13T20:29:50.673Z
Yes, I understand what you are saying , that the Universe is expanding to infinity. However what if we were able to travel faster than at the rate that it is expanding. I know this is impossible but what if hypothetically we were able do this. If we could overtake the rate of expansion then we would come to the edge of the Universe eventually. This would mean that the Universe is not infinite because we reached the end of the Universe. Another question , what would happen if we kept going ? Would we leave the Universe or would we slow down to the rate that the Universe is expanding ?
Peter U
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-14T00:00:51.060Z
Again, it would not mean that the universe is finite just because you got to the end. Just as when we were counting you could have a friend start at 600 and wait until 1:05 PM to start counting with you. It doesn't matter what time he starts at, you'll keep going forever.
EGreen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-14T00:02:31.323Z
As for what happens on the otherside, nobody knows! Sean Carroll mentions in the link that the universe doesn't have to be expanding INTO something, and if it were, we'd probably never be able to figure out what it is!
EGreen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-14T00:08:48.673Z
Also the universe is homogenous and isotropic, so it doesn't have an edge in the sense of a pool or cliff
EGreen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T01:36:43.193Z
2015-11-23T11:11:58.673Z
2015-11-23T11:11:58.673Z
EGreen
<p>In geometry one may have a line segment, of finite length, with defined start and end points. One may also have a line, continuing without bound in both directions. Then again you may have a ray, which has one end, continuing without bound in one direction. You could even have a circle, with no end, but finite length. </p>

<p>Now what is the time dimension of the universe like? That depends on how space-time is curved by the gravity of the mass and energy in the universe. Measurements suggest that time in the universe has one end, at the "big bang", but continues without bound: an "infinite universe"</p>

<p>Without knowing the exact context it is hard to be certain, but my guess is this is what is intended. The universe has start time, but no end time.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-11T16:49:48.697Z
2015-09-11T16:49:48.697Z
James K
<p>I was watching a documentary and they said that Cosmologists have determined that the Universe is infinite. I find this to contradict the expansion theory. If the Universe had a starting point then how could it be infinite ? It can only reach out as far as it has expanded in the age of the Universe, 13.8 billion years . If it was infinite then it would not be expanding because it would already reach out to infinity. I hope it is clear what it is that I am trying to say ?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-11T13:17:52.097Z
also see http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/136860/did-the-big-bang-happen-at-a-point http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/25591/does-the-universe-have-a-center
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-11T16:40:24.040Z
What documentary, which cosmologists? What was the exact context?
James K
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-11T17:16:38.723Z
"it would already reach out to infinity" - it appears you believe that "infinity" is a fixed, well-determined value. It is not. There are many kinds of infinity, and the relations of 'equal', 'greater than', etc do not apply to them in a simple way. You could definitely have something that's already infinite, and make it expand. Expansion refers to all individual parts of it, not to the whole - the whole is trickier to deal with. Example: Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel
Florin Andrei
<universe>
infinite Universe
Peter U
# infinite Universe

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-11)

I was watching a documentary and they said that Cosmologists have determined that the Universe is infinite. I find this to contradict the expansion theory. If the Universe had a starting point then how could it be infinite ? It can only reach out as far as it has expanded in the age of the Universe, 13.8 billion years . If it was infinite then it would not be expanding because it would already reach out to infinity. I hope it is clear what it is that I am trying to say ?

**Tags:** universe
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: also see http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/136860/did-the-big-bang-happen-at-a-point http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/25591/does-the-universe-have-a-center  
> **username_2**: What documentary, which cosmologists? What was the exact context?  
> **username_3**: "it would already reach out to infinity" - it appears you believe that "infinity" is a fixed, well-determined value. It is not. There are many kinds of infinity, and the relations of 'equal', 'greater than', etc do not apply to them in a simple way. You could definitely have something that's already infinite, and make it expand. Expansion refers to all individual parts of it, not to the whole - the whole is trickier to deal with. Example: Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-09-11. Score: 1

There are infinite number of points between 0cm and 1cm on your ruler, there are also an infinite number of points between 0cm and 2cm but it is plain that the 2cm gap is twice as big.

This is not an exact parallel (or even a very good inexact one) but is offered to show you that infinity may mean quite a lot of things: for instance what if space were infinite before the big bang but what happened then was that "things" (ie the spacetime metric) became ever further distant from one another - if space was already infinite then this expanded space could not reach a limit.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-09-12. Score: 0

I think you're operating under a few false presumptions, the first being that that all infinities are *instantaneous*, which they are not!

Imagine I told you to start counting at 1:00 PM tomorrow, starting at the number one, and then to keep counting, once a second, until I say stop.

So at 1:00 PM you'd start: 1...2...3...4...

At 1:05 PM you'd be at: 300...301...302...

And at 1:10 PM you'd be at: 600...601..602...

Ok now I tell you to keep counting *to infinity*, so that you never stop counting! Eventually you'll reach every number you can think of (and even more, since you can always count another second after the one you just got to), but it might take you weeks, or months, or centuries to get to there!

So in that example we had a start, 1, and we're going all the way to infinity (i.e. we'll never stop). In the same way, the universe could start at one time and keep expanding forever (the only difference is that the universe "starts counting" at 0 instead of 1).

But why 0 and not 1? Or 2? Or -356? Or even *-infinity*? Why did the universe start 13.8 billion years ago? What about the time *before* the big bang?

This is a very, very tricky question (and one which may never be answered), but most cosmologists will tell you that there was no time before the Big Bang (since there was no space!), and even if there was, we probably wouldn't be able to probe it.

I will suggest you check out Sean Carroll's blog with a few great explanations to these kind of questions:

<http://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/cosmologyprimer/faq.html>

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Yes, I understand what you are saying , that the Universe is expanding to infinity. However what if we were able to travel faster than at the rate that it is expanding. I know this is impossible but what if hypothetically we were able do this. If we could overtake the rate of expansion then we would come to the edge of the Universe eventually. This would mean that the Universe is not infinite because we reached the end of the Universe. Another question , what would happen if we kept going ? Would we leave the Universe or would we slow down to the rate that the Universe is expanding ?  
> **username_5**: Again, it would not mean that the universe is finite just because you got to the end. Just as when we were counting you could have a friend start at 600 and wait until 1:05 PM to start counting with you. It doesn't matter what time he starts at, you'll keep going forever.  
> **username_5**: As for what happens on the otherside, nobody knows! Sean Carroll mentions in the link that the universe doesn't have to be expanding INTO something, and if it were, we'd probably never be able to figure out what it is!  
> **username_5**: Also the universe is homogenous and isotropic, so it doesn't have an edge in the sense of a pool or cliff  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-09-11. Score: 0

In geometry one may have a line segment, of finite length, with defined start and end points. One may also have a line, continuing without bound in both directions. Then again you may have a ray, which has one end, continuing without bound in one direction. You could even have a circle, with no end, but finite length.

Now what is the time dimension of the universe like? That depends on how space-time is curved by the gravity of the mass and energy in the universe. Measurements suggest that time in the universe has one end, at the "big bang", but continues without bound: an "infinite universe"

Without knowing the exact context it is hard to be certain, but my guess is this is what is intended. The universe has start time, but no end time.


---

