<p>It is correct that we can't observation stars in other galaxies with the unaided eye. But with telescopes, we can see much more, including individual stars in other galaxies. We certainly have <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Extragalactic_stars" rel="nofollow noreferrer">plenty of examples</a> including several galaxies that don't orbit the Milky Way (and some outside the Local Group!)</p>
<p>Indeed, it was because we can detect individual cepheids in other galaxies that we can measure the distances to galaxies. Hubble found cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy in 1924. However, if your telescope does not have the light-collecting power and resolving power it would be nigh on impossible to detect a cepheid against the background of a whole galaxy. We build bigger telescopes to get the light grasp and resolution to do such measurements.</p>
<p>(converted from comments)</p>
<p>We can resolve individual cepheids  (we can't resolve them as a &quot;disc&quot;, but we can't resolve many stars even in our own galaxy as a disc) We can resolve them as points of light, distinct from its neighbours, and we can measure the brightness of individual stars.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-20T16:24:18.863Z
You mean that it is actually not required to resolve an individual cepheid but it is sufficient to observe its luminosity changes in a background of unresolved stars, right?
Hartmut Braun
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-20T14:03:43.297Z
2020-12-17T17:41:30.130Z
2020-12-17T17:41:30.130Z
James K
<p>If individual stars cannot be seen in other galaxies (excluding satellite galaxies of the Milky Way) then how can light from cepheids other galaxies be observed?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-18T20:00:10.380Z
What makes you say we can't detect individual stars in other galaxies? We certainly have [plenty of counterexamples](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Extragalactic_stars) including several galaxies that don't orbit the Milky Way (and some outside the Local Group!).
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-18T21:17:34.013Z
Those statements are correct for observations made with the unaided eye.  But with telescopes, we can see much more, including individual stars in other galaxies.
Eric Jensen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-20T07:50:51.673Z
Indeed, it was because we can detect individual cepheids in other galaxies that we can measure the distances to  galaxies. Hubble found cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy in 1924.  This was one of the science goals of the Hubble Telescope.  M81 in the Virgo super-cluster was one target for that key project.  However if your telescope does not have the light collecting power and resolving power it would be nigh on impossible to detect a cepheid against the background of a whole galaxy. We build bigger telescopes to get the light grasp and resolution to do such measurements.
TazAstroSpacial
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-20T15:03:03.537Z
Isn't this answered by https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/35927/visible-stars-in-andromeda-galaxy ?
ProfRob
<galaxy><cepheids>
Observing cepheid variables in other galaxies
ARinLA
# Observing cepheid variables in other galaxies

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-07-18)

If individual stars cannot be seen in other galaxies (excluding satellite galaxies of the Milky Way) then how can light from cepheids other galaxies be observed?

**Tags:** galaxy, cepheids
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What makes you say we can't detect individual stars in other galaxies? We certainly have [plenty of counterexamples](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Extragalactic_stars) including several galaxies that don't orbit the Milky Way (and some outside the Local Group!).  
> **username_2**: Those statements are correct for observations made with the unaided eye.  But with telescopes, we can see much more, including individual stars in other galaxies.  
> **username_3**: Indeed, it was because we can detect individual cepheids in other galaxies that we can measure the distances to  galaxies. Hubble found cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy in 1924.  This was one of the science goals of the Hubble Telescope.  M81 in the Virgo super-cluster was one target for that key project.  However if your telescope does not have the light collecting power and resolving power it would be nigh on impossible to detect a cepheid against the background of a whole galaxy. We build bigger telescopes to get the light grasp and resolution to do such measurements.  
> **username_4**: Isn't this answered by https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/35927/visible-stars-in-andromeda-galaxy ?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2020-07-20. Score: 1

It is correct that we can't observation stars in other galaxies with the unaided eye. But with telescopes, we can see much more, including individual stars in other galaxies. We certainly have [plenty of examples](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Extragalactic_stars) including several galaxies that don't orbit the Milky Way (and some outside the Local Group!)

Indeed, it was because we can detect individual cepheids in other galaxies that we can measure the distances to galaxies. Hubble found cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy in 1924. However, if your telescope does not have the light-collecting power and resolving power it would be nigh on impossible to detect a cepheid against the background of a whole galaxy. We build bigger telescopes to get the light grasp and resolution to do such measurements.

(converted from comments)

We can resolve individual cepheids (we can't resolve them as a "disc", but we can't resolve many stars even in our own galaxy as a disc) We can resolve them as points of light, distinct from its neighbours, and we can measure the brightness of individual stars.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: You mean that it is actually not required to resolve an individual cepheid but it is sufficient to observe its luminosity changes in a background of unresolved stars, right?  

---

