<p>Supplemental answer based on <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/40365/7982">@JamesK's</a></p>
<p>When looking at an object through Earth's atmosphere, we know that it</p>
<ul>
<li>removes some light <em>multiplicatively</em> due to absorption and scattering</li>
<li>contributes some light <em>additively</em> due to things like scattered light from other sky objects (e.g Moon and now Sun) and skyglow.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>During the daytime</em> you can dramatically improve your contrast by rejecting blue and green light first, thereby removing much of the light from the daytime <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation" rel="noreferrer">Diffuse sky radiation</a> which is of course quite intense at shorter wavelengths due to the <span class="math-container">$1 / \lambda^4$</span> behavior of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering" rel="noreferrer">Rayleigh scattering</a>.</p>
<p>You can do this by either</p>
<ol>
<li>using a digital electronic eyepiece i.e. a CCD or CMOS camera receiving an image from the telescope then displaying it on some electronic display (either a phone or a true digital electronic eyepiece)</li>
<li>using a red filter that removes blue and green light, and perhaps an opaque cloth over your head to make your viewing environment darker if necessary.</li>
</ol>
<hr />
<p>Here's an analysis of the tweeted image. I've first converted to a png so that it's simpler to read in Python without having to instal <a href="https://pypi.org/project/Pillow/" rel="noreferrer">PIL/Pillow</a>. The three peaks in the histogram show the dominant uniform sky value with relative rgb values of 0.19, 0.43 and 0.88.</p>
<p>This is not an accurate description your results using an electronic eyepiece or a blue filter, but it does illustrate how these can help.</p>
<p>Image as png: <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/tiGQD.png" rel="noreferrer">https://i.sstatic.net/tiGQD.png</a> converted from <a href="https://twitter.com/Phillymanjaro/status/549649010030821376" rel="noreferrer">this JPEG-containing tweet</a> by Philip Cruden</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/WkiFb.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/WkiFb.png" alt="Philip Cruden tweeted https://twitter.com/Phillymanjaro/status/549649010030821376" /></a></p>
<pre><code>import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

img = plt.imread('tiGQD.png')
rgb = np.moveaxis(img, 2, 0)
histograms = [np.histogram(thing, bins=256) for thing in rgb]

plt.figure()

plt.subplot(2, 2, 1)
colors = 'rgb'
for (a, b), color in zip(histograms, colors):
    
    plt.plot(b[1:], a, color=color)
    
for i, (im, color) in enumerate(zip(rgb, colors)):
    
    plt.subplot(2, 2, i+2)
    mean = str(round(im.mean(), 2))
    plt.title('color = ' + color + ' mean = ' + mean)
    plt.imshow(im, vmin=0, vmax=1, cmap='gray')
    trace = 400 - 380 * im[215]
    plt.plot(trace, '-r')
    plt.plot(np.zeros_like(trace), '-k')
    
plt.show()
</code></pre>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T01:22:11.297Z
The kind of stuff I hope I'm able to.understand in due time.
eftshift0
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T00:54:35.247Z
2020-12-14T06:23:26.207Z
2020-12-14T06:23:26.207Z
uhoh
<h1>Moon as reference point</h1>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/4DjzV.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4DjzV.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>With a bit of patience, you can wait until the Moon is:</p>
<ul>
<li>not too close to the Sun</li>
<li>close to the planet you would like to watch</li>
</ul>
<p>If the angular separation between the Moon and the planet is less than ~5°, you can use Stellarium to know in which direction you should move your telescope. You can use the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminator_(solar)" rel="noreferrer">terminator</a> as a reference line, and the Moon diameter (~0.5°) to know how far the planet should be. If the planet is further away, it might be too hard to use the Moon as reference.</p>
<p>First quarter moon () will be helpful if the planets are in the sky before sunset, last quarter moon () will be helpful if the planets are in the sky after sunrise.</p>
<p>You might have to try different eyepieces :</p>
<ul>
<li>if the magnification is too high, you might miss the planet</li>
<li>if the magnification is too low, the sky will be really bright and the planet might not be visible</li>
<li>the planet is probably not bright enough in the finder, compared to the background sky</li>
</ul>
<p>With this method, I've seen Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn while the sun was still in the sky, with a simple Dobsonian. No need for GOTO or equatorial mount.</p>
<p>I've also watched Mercury during the day, by using Venus as a reference point.</p>
<p>You could try next week, 23rd of December, at around 15:00. The sun will be SW, the moon and Mars will be around SSE (as seen from the northern hemisphere). Mars will be a bit further away than 5° from the Moon, but it might still be doable.</p>
<h1>Stellarium tips</h1>
<p>Stellarium can help you find the right moment:</p>
<ul>
<li>Click on the Moon</li>
<li>Track the Moon (<kbd>Space</kbd>)</li>
<li>Hide the ground (<kbd>G</kbd>)</li>
<li>Hide the atmosphere (<kbd>A</kbd></li>
<li>Equatorial mount (<kbd>Ctrl</kbd> + <kbd>M</kbd>)</li>
<li>Equatorial grid (<kbd>E</kbd>)</li>
<li>Press <kbd>L</kbd> repeatedly to advance in time</li>
<li>Press <kbd>K</kbd> to stop when the Moon is close to a planet, preferably during a quarter moon.</li>
<li>Show the ground and atmosphere again, to see when the Moon and planets are high in the sky.</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T00:07:02.453Z
`+1` This is an excellent answer and great advice!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T08:51:15.670Z
2020-12-14T16:05:54.373Z
2020-12-14T16:05:54.373Z
Eric Duminil
<p>It is possible, and under certain conditions, you don't even need a telescope at all!</p>
<p>Around noon on December 3, 2018 I saw Venus with the naked eye. The moon was invaluable for finding. My cell phone camera even (barely) picked up Venus. It is only about 100 pixels in this jpg, but it's there at the center of the indicated circle.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/a3d4l.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/a3d4l.jpg" alt="Venus detected by cell phone camera at noon on December 3, 2018" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T19:29:33.820Z
What would be the _ideal_ conditions that I should be longing for? I guess one of them is that humidity be as low as possible, right? What are acceptable values? What else should I consider?
eftshift0
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T20:58:47.790Z
@eftshift0 Yes, cool dry air is better than warm moist air. The humidity itself isn't a problem, it's the variations in density / refractive index due to temperature & humidity that make the optical path wobbly.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T21:11:10.507Z
It's kind of surreal to see Venus with the naked eye in the middle of the day. I managed to spot it at every hour of the day a few years ago, when it was bright & close to the Moon. It's also possible (with practice) to see it without using the Moon as a reference, but the Moon certainly does make it easier. You just need to be in a familiar location where you can use ground-based landmarks (like treetops or points on a nearby roof).
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T00:22:54.873Z
Beautiful cell phone image! I cropped and plotted the blue channel only (as discussed [here](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/40371/7982)) between 0.55 and 0.75 and pulled out Venus more clearly using `plt.imsave('hey!.png', rgb[0], vmin=0.55, vmax=0.75, cmap='gray')` This puts the sky level close to zero and accentuates the familliar JPEG artifacts. Did you have to work hard to get the phone to focus at infinity? https://i.sstatic.net/wK78G.png
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T07:43:10.040Z
@PM2Ring: It's also really impressive how easy it is to miss Venus during the day. Once you see it, it's really clear, but as soon as you look one degree away, it disappears.
Eric Duminil
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T20:31:34.717Z
@uhoh Thanks! I did have to mess around with the manual settings on my old BlackBerry Priv to get the shot. I love the way Venus pops in your version.
mistaben
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T18:21:22.510Z
2020-12-14T18:21:22.510Z
mistaben
<p>Bear in mind an equatorial mount only works well when properly aligned. If your scope has GOTO you should enter the name of the planet (if it's in the database) and use the lowest power you have, since that will give you a larger area of sky, thus a greater chance your target will be visible there.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T02:28:19.963Z
2020-12-14T02:28:19.963Z
Michael Poxon
<p>Jupiter can be seen during the day.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/W1GpB.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/W1GpB.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>This image is by Philip Crude. Philip is an experienced astro-photographer. On his webpage <a href="http://www.billionplanetsquest.com/p/planets.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.billionplanetsquest.com/p/planets.html</a> he gives details of the equipment and settings used:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This image was captured through my [i.e., Philip Crude's] Celestron CGEM-800 using a ZWO ASI120MC camera at prime focus. Resolution 640 x 480, 35fps best of 900, Brightness @ 1, Gamma @ 48, Gain @ 11. The image was acquistioned with SharpCap and processed with RegiStax and CS6.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Philip also tweeted the image <a href="https://twitter.com/Phillymanjaro/status/549649010030821376" rel="noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>The main difficulty is pointing the telescope in the right direction, as you won't be able to align it against the background of stars, so you need to predict the position and point the telescope accordingly.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-13T18:21:07.150Z
Suggested edit : "The image was acquistioned with SharpCap and processed with RegiStax and CS6" rather than your last two lines - it's a direct quote from the second site you linked to about that image.
StephenG - Help Ukraine
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-14T01:08:17.167Z
That edit with an out of context quote from Philips website made it look as if I was claiming to have taken the picture, which I wasn't.   So i've deleted all the metainformation about how the image was captured It wasn't really relevant, I just hoped to indicate to the OP the sort of equipment that was used. If you want to see then follow the links.
James K
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T10:08:22.453Z
I edited Philips technical information back in because I think it is of particular interest in the context of this question, and we are encouraged to copy relevant parts of pages we link to. I edited the answer to make it clearer that it wasn't your photo, James.
Peter - Reinstate Monica
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T10:09:56.213Z
Also, I'm compelled to add that I'm in awe of that picture. Stunning.
Peter - Reinstate Monica
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T19:11:03.597Z
Notably caught Io in that shot as well.  So if your next question was "Is it possible to observe another planet's moons during the day?", well...
Darrel Hoffman
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-13T17:20:55.567Z
2020-12-15T11:35:19.203Z
2020-12-15T11:35:19.203Z
James K
<p>Keep in mind I'm just a newbie. So.... I have a new Newtonian telescope. It has 150mm opening and 1400mm Focal Distance on top of an equatorial mount. I have 25 and 10 mm eyepieces... and a 2x Barlow. I sat down to do observation yesterday and was able to see Saturn and Jupiter (warming up for the alignment on the 21th). Now, I did notice that as they sank closer to the horizon, the effect of the atmosphere was more apparent (and they were less sharp) so I'd like to see if it is possible to see them earlier when they are higher in the sky to try to minimize the effect of the atmosphere... but that might mean to watch them when the sun hasn't set yet. I know that we can't see them with the naked eye when it is daytime but given that the telescope is letting a lot more light in, then it should be possible to see them if I point in the right direction? I intend to use the sun to get RA/DEC alignment (using the telescope shadow, don't intent to look at the sun with the telescope.... yet! :-D) so that then I can point the telescope in the direction of the planets (and I am using Stellarium on my Debian box to get the numbers and stuff).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-13T15:42:58.533Z
I've seen Mercury and Venus on blue skies, but I haven't tried Jupiter and Saturn. Dylan O'Donnell made a video about taking a photo of Jupiter during the day, https://youtu.be/EtE87WzYieY

I assume you know to never point a telescope (without a solar filter) at the sun and are using an indirect method like: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-resources/astronomy-questions-answers/polar-align-in-daytime/
Jack Schmidt
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-13T15:57:13.103Z
To align it? Was thinking of using its shadow, actually, in order to align it. Don't intent to look at the sun with the telescope.... and thanks for the warning, anyway.
eftshift0
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-13T18:15:57.153Z
I would suggest that if you are newish at this then it would be better to get the basic *nighttime* technique well learned and practiced before attempting anything too advanced.  Just night astronomy is difficult enough to do consistently well for most people.
StephenG - Help Ukraine
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T17:46:29.220Z
I’ve been told a few times that Venus is bright enough to be seen naked eye during the day on clear skies, *if you know exactly where to look*. But have to have good eyesight and I’m sure it has to hit the fovea spot on. I’ve tried a few times without success though.
Euro Micelli
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T18:10:52.123Z
I don’t think the scope’s shadow is anywhere near precise enough. If I were you I would try to get a “solar finder” such as the TeleView Sol-Searcher. Make sure you have a way to attach it to your tube without sacrificing the (regular) finder as you’re going to need it to find the planets. But aligning the sun finder itself might be tricky without looking at the sun via a proper (aperture) solar filter and I would be hesitant to do that alone if it was my first time without in-person guidance for safety. And I worry there might not be enough time to procure it before the event.
Euro Micelli
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-15T18:13:06.577Z
Thank you all for your feedback. It's priceless. So far, I haven't tried daylight... was just testing the basic stuff to find stuff using dec/ra last night..... might try tomorrow (after I do more testing tonight with the moon and jupiter/saturn) and I'll let you know how it went. Crossing fingers
eftshift0
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-16T01:01:41.177Z
Just as a teaser, I've found that I can align the sun very precisely with a simple trick (not that I'm able to measure how close it is.... I am not looking with the telescope or through the finder when I do it... or have an instrument to measure it): Get the finder shadow to be circular and very small.... then there will be a blurry projection of the light of the sun that will be very close to the shadow.... if I center this projection on the finder shadow, I _think_ it is very much centered on the sun.
eftshift0
<observational-astronomy><telescope>
Is it possible to do planet observation during the day?
eftshift0
# Is it possible to do planet observation during the day?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-12-13)

Keep in mind I'm just a newbie. So.... I have a new Newtonian telescope. It has 150mm opening and 1400mm Focal Distance on top of an equatorial mount. I have 25 and 10 mm eyepieces... and a 2x Barlow. I sat down to do observation yesterday and was able to see Saturn and Jupiter (warming up for the alignment on the 21th). Now, I did notice that as they sank closer to the horizon, the effect of the atmosphere was more apparent (and they were less sharp) so I'd like to see if it is possible to see them earlier when they are higher in the sky to try to minimize the effect of the atmosphere... but that might mean to watch them when the sun hasn't set yet. I know that we can't see them with the naked eye when it is daytime but given that the telescope is letting a lot more light in, then it should be possible to see them if I point in the right direction? I intend to use the sun to get RA/DEC alignment (using the telescope shadow, don't intent to look at the sun with the telescope.... yet! :-D) so that then I can point the telescope in the direction of the planets (and I am using Stellarium on my Debian box to get the numbers and stuff).

**Tags:** observational-astronomy, telescope
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I've seen Mercury and Venus on blue skies, but I haven't tried Jupiter and Saturn. Dylan O'Donnell made a video about taking a photo of Jupiter during the day, https://youtu.be/EtE87WzYieY  I assume you know to never point a telescope (without a solar filter) at the sun and are using an indirect method like: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-resources/astronomy-questions-answers/polar-align-in-daytime/  
> **username_0**: To align it? Was thinking of using its shadow, actually, in order to align it. Don't intent to look at the sun with the telescope.... and thanks for the warning, anyway.  
> **username_2**: I would suggest that if you are newish at this then it would be better to get the basic *nighttime* technique well learned and practiced before attempting anything too advanced.  Just night astronomy is difficult enough to do consistently well for most people.  
> **username_3**: I’ve been told a few times that Venus is bright enough to be seen naked eye during the day on clear skies, *if you know exactly where to look*. But have to have good eyesight and I’m sure it has to hit the fovea spot on. I’ve tried a few times without success though.  
> **username_3**: I don’t think the scope’s shadow is anywhere near precise enough. If I were you I would try to get a “solar finder” such as the TeleView Sol-Searcher. Make sure you have a way to attach it to your tube without sacrificing the (regular) finder as you’re going to need it to find the planets. But aligning the sun finder itself might be tricky without looking at the sun via a proper (aperture) solar filter and I would be hesitant to do that alone if it was my first time without in-person guidance for safety. And I worry there might not be enough time to procure it before the event.  
> **username_0**: Thank you all for your feedback. It's priceless. So far, I haven't tried daylight... was just testing the basic stuff to find stuff using dec/ra last night..... might try tomorrow (after I do more testing tonight with the moon and jupiter/saturn) and I'll let you know how it went. Crossing fingers  
> **username_0**: Just as a teaser, I've found that I can align the sun very precisely with a simple trick (not that I'm able to measure how close it is.... I am not looking with the telescope or through the finder when I do it... or have an instrument to measure it): Get the finder shadow to be circular and very small.... then there will be a blurry projection of the light of the sun that will be very close to the shadow.... if I center this projection on the finder shadow, I _think_ it is very much centered on the sun.  

---

## 5 answers

### Answer by username_9 on 2020-12-13. Score: 34 | Accepted answer

Jupiter can be seen during the day.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/W1GpB.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/W1GpB.png)

This image is by Philip Crude. Philip is an experienced astro-photographer. On his webpage <http://www.billionplanetsquest.com/p/planets.html> he gives details of the equipment and settings used:

> This image was captured through my [i.e., Philip Crude's] Celestron CGEM-800 using a ZWO ASI120MC camera at prime focus. Resolution 640 x 480, 35fps best of 900, Brightness @ 1, Gamma @ 48, Gain @ 11. The image was acquistioned with SharpCap and processed with RegiStax and CS6.

Philip also tweeted the image [here](https://twitter.com/Phillymanjaro/status/549649010030821376).

The main difficulty is pointing the telescope in the right direction, as you won't be able to align it against the background of stars, so you need to predict the position and point the telescope accordingly.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Suggested edit : "The image was acquistioned with SharpCap and processed with RegiStax and CS6" rather than your last two lines - it's a direct quote from the second site you linked to about that image.  
> **username_9**: That edit with an out of context quote from Philips website made it look as if I was claiming to have taken the picture, which I wasn't.   So i've deleted all the metainformation about how the image was captured It wasn't really relevant, I just hoped to indicate to the OP the sort of equipment that was used. If you want to see then follow the links.  
> **username_10**: I edited Philips technical information back in because I think it is of particular interest in the context of this question, and we are encouraged to copy relevant parts of pages we link to. I edited the answer to make it clearer that it wasn't your photo, James.  
> **username_10**: Also, I'm compelled to add that I'm in awe of that picture. Stunning.  
> **username_11**: Notably caught Io in that shot as well.  So if your next question was "Is it possible to observe another planet's moons during the day?", well...  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-12-14. Score: 16

Supplemental answer based on @JamesK's
When looking at an object through Earth's atmosphere, we know that it

removes some light multiplicatively due to absorption and scattering
contributes some light additively due to things like scattered light from other sky objects (e.g Moon and now Sun) and skyglow.

During the daytime you can dramatically improve your contrast by rejecting blue and green light first, thereby removing much of the light from the daytime Diffuse sky radiation which is of course quite intense at shorter wavelengths due to the $1 / \lambda^4$ behavior of Rayleigh scattering.
You can do this by either

using a digital electronic eyepiece i.e. a CCD or CMOS camera receiving an image from the telescope then displaying it on some electronic display (either a phone or a true digital electronic eyepiece)
using a red filter that removes blue and green light, and perhaps an opaque cloth over your head to make your viewing environment darker if necessary.


Here's an analysis of the tweeted image. I've first converted to a png so that it's simpler to read in Python without having to instal PIL/Pillow. The three peaks in the histogram show the dominant uniform sky value with relative rgb values of 0.19, 0.43 and 0.88.
This is not an accurate description your results using an electronic eyepiece or a blue filter, but it does illustrate how these can help.
Image as png: https://i.sstatic.net/tiGQD.png converted from this JPEG-containing tweet by Philip Cruden

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

img = plt.imread('tiGQD.png')
rgb = np.moveaxis(img, 2, 0)
histograms = [np.histogram(thing, bins=256) for thing in rgb]

plt.figure()

plt.subplot(2, 2, 1)
colors = 'rgb'
for (a, b), color in zip(histograms, colors):
    
    plt.plot(b[1:], a, color=color)
    
for i, (im, color) in enumerate(zip(rgb, colors)):
    
    plt.subplot(2, 2, i+2)
    mean = str(round(im.mean(), 2))
    plt.title('color = ' + color + ' mean = ' + mean)
    plt.imshow(im, vmin=0, vmax=1, cmap='gray')
    trace = 400 - 380 * im[215]
    plt.plot(trace, '-r')
    plt.plot(np.zeros_like(trace), '-k')
    
plt.show()

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The kind of stuff I hope I'm able to.understand in due time.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2020-12-14. Score: 12

# Moon as reference point

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/4DjzV.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/4DjzV.png)

With a bit of patience, you can wait until the Moon is:

* not too close to the Sun
* close to the planet you would like to watch

If the angular separation between the Moon and the planet is less than ~5°, you can use Stellarium to know in which direction you should move your telescope. You can use the [terminator](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminator_(solar)) as a reference line, and the Moon diameter (~0.5°) to know how far the planet should be. If the planet is further away, it might be too hard to use the Moon as reference.

First quarter moon () will be helpful if the planets are in the sky before sunset, last quarter moon () will be helpful if the planets are in the sky after sunrise.

You might have to try different eyepieces :

* if the magnification is too high, you might miss the planet
* if the magnification is too low, the sky will be really bright and the planet might not be visible
* the planet is probably not bright enough in the finder, compared to the background sky

With this method, I've seen Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn while the sun was still in the sky, with a simple Dobsonian. No need for GOTO or equatorial mount.

I've also watched Mercury during the day, by using Venus as a reference point.

You could try next week, 23rd of December, at around 15:00. The sun will be SW, the moon and Mars will be around SSE (as seen from the northern hemisphere). Mars will be a bit further away than 5° from the Moon, but it might still be doable.

# Stellarium tips

Stellarium can help you find the right moment:

* Click on the Moon
* Track the Moon (`Space`)
* Hide the ground (`G`)
* Hide the atmosphere (`A`
* Equatorial mount (`Ctrl` + `M`)
* Equatorial grid (`E`)
* Press `L` repeatedly to advance in time
* Press `K` to stop when the Moon is close to a planet, preferably during a quarter moon.
* Show the ground and atmosphere again, to see when the Moon and planets are high in the sky.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: `+1` This is an excellent answer and great advice!  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2020-12-14. Score: 10

It is possible, and under certain conditions, you don't even need a telescope at all!

Around noon on December 3, 2018 I saw Venus with the naked eye. The moon was invaluable for finding. My cell phone camera even (barely) picked up Venus. It is only about 100 pixels in this jpg, but it's there at the center of the indicated circle.

[![Venus detected by cell phone camera at noon on December 3, 2018](https://i.sstatic.net/a3d4l.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/a3d4l.jpg)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: What would be the _ideal_ conditions that I should be longing for? I guess one of them is that humidity be as low as possible, right? What are acceptable values? What else should I consider?  
> **username_7**: @eftshift0 Yes, cool dry air is better than warm moist air. The humidity itself isn't a problem, it's the variations in density / refractive index due to temperature & humidity that make the optical path wobbly.  
> **username_7**: It's kind of surreal to see Venus with the naked eye in the middle of the day. I managed to spot it at every hour of the day a few years ago, when it was bright & close to the Moon. It's also possible (with practice) to see it without using the Moon as a reference, but the Moon certainly does make it easier. You just need to be in a familiar location where you can use ground-based landmarks (like treetops or points on a nearby roof).  
> **username_4**: Beautiful cell phone image! I cropped and plotted the blue channel only (as discussed [here](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/40371/7982)) between 0.55 and 0.75 and pulled out Venus more clearly using `plt.imsave('hey!.png', rgb[0], vmin=0.55, vmax=0.75, cmap='gray')` This puts the sky level close to zero and accentuates the familliar JPEG artifacts. Did you have to work hard to get the phone to focus at infinity? https://i.sstatic.net/wK78G.png  
> **username_5**: @PM2Ring: It's also really impressive how easy it is to miss Venus during the day. Once you see it, it's really clear, but as soon as you look one degree away, it disappears.  
> **username_6**: @uhoh Thanks! I did have to mess around with the manual settings on my old BlackBerry Priv to get the shot. I love the way Venus pops in your version.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2020-12-14. Score: 1

Bear in mind an equatorial mount only works well when properly aligned. If your scope has GOTO you should enter the name of the planet (if it's in the database) and use the lowest power you have, since that will give you a larger area of sky, thus a greater chance your target will be visible there.


---

