<p>Presumably you're supposed to start by calculating the minimum orbital period a comet can have for a 10,000 AU aphelion distance.</p>

<p>Then divide that period (number of years) by five, assuming we see on average one of these every five years.</p>

<p>That will give you an estimate for how many there are out there.</p>

<p>(I would also tell the person setting the question that there are some pretty wild assumptions implied in the question!)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-19T15:01:07.770Z
Assumptions like 1. All Oort cloud objects fly regularly through the the inner solar system. 2. They are equally distributed. 3. The radius of the cloud is 10000 AU. 3. You can calculate the mass from the 1km+ comets only.
SE - stop firing the good guys
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-21T01:53:41.387Z
Don't we have to consider how wide our "line of sight" is? As in do we have to consider how far we can see (if we take this line of sight as like a cylinder then do we have to consider the cross-sectional area of this cylinder)?
Happytreat
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-22T14:52:01.797Z
@Happytreat I would assume line of sight does not matter - and that every one of these comets can be assumed to be clearly visible when it is at perihelion in its orbit.  (yet another assumption implied in the question.)
Andy
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-19T16:24:34.293Z
Assumption 5 - all the comets have a uniform, known density.
DylanSp
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-19T14:56:48.173Z
2016-02-19T14:56:48.173Z
Andy
<p><strong>Question:</strong>
Approximately once in 5 years people on Earth can observe bright comets whose nuclei have radius about 1km. The orbits of such comets are close to parabolic. Assuming that these nuclei are uniformly filling the volume of spherical Oort cloud with radius 10000 AU, estimate the number of large comet nuclei and mass of Oort cloud.</p>

<p>I'm not sure how to even start this question because I don't get how the comets uniformly fill Oort cloud yet on Earth we can only observe comets once every 5 years (unless there are some things blocking our views of these comets?). Would appreciate any help.  </p>

<p>P.S. Relativity should not be needed in this question... </p>

<astrophysics><newtonian-gravity><oort-cloud>
Astronomy Olympiad Gravitation Qn
Happytreat
# Astronomy Olympiad Gravitation Qn

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-02-19)

**Question:**
Approximately once in 5 years people on Earth can observe bright comets whose nuclei have radius about 1km. The orbits of such comets are close to parabolic. Assuming that these nuclei are uniformly filling the volume of spherical Oort cloud with radius 10000 AU, estimate the number of large comet nuclei and mass of Oort cloud.

I'm not sure how to even start this question because I don't get how the comets uniformly fill Oort cloud yet on Earth we can only observe comets once every 5 years (unless there are some things blocking our views of these comets?). Would appreciate any help.

P.S. Relativity should not be needed in this question...

**Tags:** astrophysics, newtonian-gravity, oort-cloud

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-02-19. Score: 1

Presumably you're supposed to start by calculating the minimum orbital period a comet can have for a 10,000 AU aphelion distance.

Then divide that period (number of years) by five, assuming we see on average one of these every five years.

That will give you an estimate for how many there are out there.

(I would also tell the person setting the question that there are some pretty wild assumptions implied in the question!)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Assumptions like 1. All Oort cloud objects fly regularly through the the inner solar system. 2. They are equally distributed. 3. The radius of the cloud is 10000 AU. 3. You can calculate the mass from the 1km+ comets only.  
> **username_0**: Don't we have to consider how wide our "line of sight" is? As in do we have to consider how far we can see (if we take this line of sight as like a cylinder then do we have to consider the cross-sectional area of this cylinder)?  
> **username_1**: @Happytreat I would assume line of sight does not matter - and that every one of these comets can be assumed to be clearly visible when it is at perihelion in its orbit.  (yet another assumption implied in the question.)  
> **username_3**: Assumption 5 - all the comets have a uniform, known density.  

---

