<p>As those observations are from only a few days ago, I think the data will still be embargoed, usually one year, until it's publicly available.</p>

<p>To confirm this, I've looked at the <a href="https://hla.stsci.edu/hlaview.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Hubble Legacy archive</a>, where Hubble data is made publicly available. When you look there, the last public data for Jupiter is from February 2016.<br>
Although I couldn't use the retrieved data from 2016, as it's not the FITS format, but it downloaded something.</p>

<p>So either you'll have to wait it seems, or you contact the project PI and ask nicely ;)</p>

<p>In the HST proposal page from the MAST archive (that links to the legacy archive) you see the photos they've taken listed, but the data is not available, I guess due to embargo.</p>

<p>Edit:
However I'm not sure if the legacy archive has all the data, as there's one dataset from 2011 with which I've worked that should be there, and I can't find it. Weird.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T13:58:39.333Z
To double check, does the answer include "Yes! There almost certainly are - lots of them, at many wavelengths, but..." I didn't notice that there was a plethora of exposures on that page if one scrolls down. I thought it was just a title page for the/a proposal. Your answer is very helpful, I think I understand much better how the whole thing works. Thanks!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-11T08:49:23.530Z
I've asked the follow-up question [How is wavelength-dependent limb darkening of Jupiter modeled?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/20693/7982).
uhoh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T12:13:49.427Z
2017-04-10T15:27:29.543Z
2017-04-10T15:27:29.543Z
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
<p>This recent HST image of Jupiter near opposition is <a href="http://hubblesite.org/image/4013/news_release/2017-15" rel="nofollow noreferrer">described here</a> and <a href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=12570&amp;button=recent" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> and was made under <a href="http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&amp;id=14756" rel="nofollow noreferrer">HST proposal 14756</a>. It was taken with WFC3/UVIS. It is made from three images using narrow-band filters at 395, 502, and 631 nanometers. </p>

<p>I am wondering if there were additional images recorded with filters at other wavelengths. If so, how could I go about finding them?</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/WQpjc.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/WQpjc.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T13:07:52.470Z
Wouldn't the proposal tell you all the images they were planning on taking? If they don't list more, then they probably didn't take more.
zephyr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-11T08:49:13.380Z
I've asked the follow-up question [How is wavelength-dependent limb darkening of Jupiter modeled?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/20693/7982).
uhoh
<solar-system><jupiter><data-analysis><hubble-telescope>
Are there more images with different filters available for the April 6 Hubble image of Jupiter?
uhoh
# Are there more images with different filters available for the April 6 Hubble image of Jupiter?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-10)

This recent HST image of Jupiter near opposition is [described here](http://hubblesite.org/image/4013/news_release/2017-15) and [here](https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=12570&button=recent) and was made under [HST proposal 14756](http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&id=14756). It was taken with WFC3/UVIS. It is made from three images using narrow-band filters at 395, 502, and 631 nanometers.

I am wondering if there were additional images recorded with filters at other wavelengths. If so, how could I go about finding them?

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/WQpjc.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/WQpjc.jpg)

**Tags:** solar-system, jupiter, data-analysis, hubble-telescope
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Wouldn't the proposal tell you all the images they were planning on taking? If they don't list more, then they probably didn't take more.  
> **username_0**: I've asked the follow-up question [How is wavelength-dependent limb darkening of Jupiter modeled?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/20693/7982).  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-04-10. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

As those observations are from only a few days ago, I think the data will still be embargoed, usually one year, until it's publicly available.

To confirm this, I've looked at the [Hubble Legacy archive](https://hla.stsci.edu/hlaview.html), where Hubble data is made publicly available. When you look there, the last public data for Jupiter is from February 2016.  
Although I couldn't use the retrieved data from 2016, as it's not the FITS format, but it downloaded something.

So either you'll have to wait it seems, or you contact the project PI and ask nicely ;)

In the HST proposal page from the MAST archive (that links to the legacy archive) you see the photos they've taken listed, but the data is not available, I guess due to embargo.

Edit:
However I'm not sure if the legacy archive has all the data, as there's one dataset from 2011 with which I've worked that should be there, and I can't find it. Weird.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: To double check, does the answer include "Yes! There almost certainly are - lots of them, at many wavelengths, but..." I didn't notice that there was a plethora of exposures on that page if one scrolls down. I thought it was just a title page for the/a proposal. Your answer is very helpful, I think I understand much better how the whole thing works. Thanks!  
> **username_0**: I've asked the follow-up question [How is wavelength-dependent limb darkening of Jupiter modeled?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/20693/7982).  

---

