<p>The explanation is that as Ultima and Thule were forming, they collected out of small hunks of debris and piles of accumulated rubble.  The key thing is that once U and T became the biggest piles of rubble around, any new rock or pile of rubble that gently approached them would be much smaller then U and T and hit and gently bounce a bit and, on average, settles down in a low spot. The collisions are mostly pretty gentle and even rubble heaps probably mostly stay stuck together because the force of gravity isn't enough to overcome the cohesion of the material.</p>

<p>U and T grow and are -- roughly -- spherical since the things colliding with them and sticking to them are much smaller than they are, there are lots and lots of them, and they have a small tendency to end up in low spots. So a rough sphere emerges.</p>

<p>When U and T finally collide to produce Ultima Thule, it's another gentle collision, and the same thing happens: Gravitational forces are too small to overcome cohesion, so U and T stay pretty much the shape they were in and you have a body which is two spheres stuck together at the point of collision.</p>

<p>U and T formed spherical because they formed out of many much smaller pieces which are probably still pretty distinct, but which are too small to see -- yet.  UT formed out of two big pieces which are also still pretty distinct, but much easier to see..</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-06T01:43:04.697Z
2019-01-06T01:43:04.697Z
Mark Olson
<p>The two component parts of the Ultima Thule contact binary are approximately spherical. Why have the same forces that made the two parts spherical when they were separate not made the whole thing spherical after they joined?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T21:22:08.647Z
Your question contains an invalid assumption, to wit: "...the same forces..." . The exact distribution of dust, etc. which led to the original clumping of two semispherical objects is not the same as the two objects, each with rather stronger interparticle bonding (as well as local microgravity much greater than gravitational force between two dust particles) , drifting together. Add to that the fact that we are seeing this object at a particular point in time. Quite possible another billion years' worth of dust accumulation will produce an overall semispherical object with "twin centers" .
Carl Witthoft
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-05T22:46:04.240Z
Simple answer: We don't know, it's a topic of active research how planetesimals form and then coagulate into larger objects.
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-06T15:34:08.703Z
Although we don't know how the two sub parts formed it is quite intuitive that a gentle enough collision between them lead to such a shape.  Like if you merge two hail grains. Formation of each grain and pressing them together are quite distinct phenomena at least in general.
Alchimista
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-09T19:05:42.607Z
Nebular space was hotter when the two objects formed than when they collided?
Wayfaring Stranger
<planetary-formation>
Why isn't Ultima Thule spherical, while its two component parts are
Mike H
# Why isn't Ultima Thule spherical, while its two component parts are

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-01-05)

The two component parts of the Ultima Thule contact binary are approximately spherical. Why have the same forces that made the two parts spherical when they were separate not made the whole thing spherical after they joined?

**Tags:** planetary-formation
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Your question contains an invalid assumption, to wit: "...the same forces..." . The exact distribution of dust, etc. which led to the original clumping of two semispherical objects is not the same as the two objects, each with rather stronger interparticle bonding (as well as local microgravity much greater than gravitational force between two dust particles) , drifting together. Add to that the fact that we are seeing this object at a particular point in time. Quite possible another billion years' worth of dust accumulation will produce an overall semispherical object with "twin centers" .  
> **username_2**: Simple answer: We don't know, it's a topic of active research how planetesimals form and then coagulate into larger objects.  
> **username_3**: Although we don't know how the two sub parts formed it is quite intuitive that a gentle enough collision between them lead to such a shape.  Like if you merge two hail grains. Formation of each grain and pressing them together are quite distinct phenomena at least in general.  
> **username_4**: Nebular space was hotter when the two objects formed than when they collided?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2019-01-06. Score: 4

The explanation is that as Ultima and Thule were forming, they collected out of small hunks of debris and piles of accumulated rubble. The key thing is that once U and T became the biggest piles of rubble around, any new rock or pile of rubble that gently approached them would be much smaller then U and T and hit and gently bounce a bit and, on average, settles down in a low spot. The collisions are mostly pretty gentle and even rubble heaps probably mostly stay stuck together because the force of gravity isn't enough to overcome the cohesion of the material.

U and T grow and are -- roughly -- spherical since the things colliding with them and sticking to them are much smaller than they are, there are lots and lots of them, and they have a small tendency to end up in low spots. So a rough sphere emerges.

When U and T finally collide to produce Ultima Thule, it's another gentle collision, and the same thing happens: Gravitational forces are too small to overcome cohesion, so U and T stay pretty much the shape they were in and you have a body which is two spheres stuck together at the point of collision.

U and T formed spherical because they formed out of many much smaller pieces which are probably still pretty distinct, but which are too small to see -- yet. UT formed out of two big pieces which are also still pretty distinct, but much easier to see..


---

