<p>OK, I'll assume you are talking about <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/runaway-star.html" rel="nofollow">this star</a> or some other high-mass "runaway star".</p>

<p>Most massive stars are born in rich clusters and are often part of multiple system. Is not unusual for such stars to get ejected from these regions are high velocities, either as a result of dynamical interactions in multiple systems or when they are companions to stars that explode as supernovae.</p>

<p>The steps to estimate the mass are: (i) Obtain very detailed optical and UV spectroscopy. From this you estimate the spectral type of the star, it's effective temperature and its (current) mass-loss rate. (ii) You combine this with a known distance (the star in the link was in the Large Magellanic Cloud, so the distance was known fairly accurately) to estimate a luminosity. (iii) You compare the luminosity, temperature and mass-loss rate with the predictions of a specialised high-mass stellar evolutionary model, which includes mass-loss and rotation. The comparison yields an estimate of the mass and age of the star.</p>

<p>The details are found in <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715L..74E" rel="nofollow">Evans et al. (2010)</a>. It is probably fair to say that the estimate of $90\ M_{\odot}$, is uncertain by a few tens of solar masses.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-20T22:26:41.403Z
2016-03-20T22:26:41.403Z
ProfRob
<p>I would like to know how do astronomers estimate the mass of a star that has been ejected from its galaxy.  What kind of accuracy can be achieved?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T07:49:13.217Z
What is a "rogue star"?
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T09:26:42.397Z
@RobJeffries: I believe any star that is "kicked out" by their own galaxy gets demoted to rogue star.
user6760
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T10:46:00.440Z
In that case the mass is estimated in the same way as any other star. You put it on an HR diagram and match it up with a stellar model. If the distance is unknown then you have to use the "spectroscopists" HR diagram by estimating the surface gravity to place it in the evolutionary lifecycle and then using the temperature to estimate the mass.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T10:47:42.520Z
Closely related, and possibly a duplicate, http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/11342/calculating-the-mass-of-star?rq=1
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T10:48:36.050Z
I could provide a more detailed answer if you tell me exactly what the context is and what observational material might be available.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T11:10:32.010Z
@RobJeffries: I thought that preventing people from applying Kepler's law and only rely on light from the surface to determine its mass is a daunting task...
user6760
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-18T12:04:08.100Z
It's not daunting - just imprecise.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-20T14:54:06.177Z
Such stars are known as "runaway stars". https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1662.html
James K
<star><mass>
How to determine the mass of a runaway star?
user6760
# How to determine the mass of a runaway star?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-03-18)

I would like to know how do astronomers estimate the mass of a star that has been ejected from its galaxy. What kind of accuracy can be achieved?

**Tags:** star, mass
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What is a "rogue star"?  
> **username_0**: @RobJeffries: I believe any star that is "kicked out" by their own galaxy gets demoted to rogue star.  
> **username_1**: In that case the mass is estimated in the same way as any other star. You put it on an HR diagram and match it up with a stellar model. If the distance is unknown then you have to use the "spectroscopists" HR diagram by estimating the surface gravity to place it in the evolutionary lifecycle and then using the temperature to estimate the mass.  
> **username_1**: Closely related, and possibly a duplicate, http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/11342/calculating-the-mass-of-star?rq=1  
> **username_1**: I could provide a more detailed answer if you tell me exactly what the context is and what observational material might be available.  
> **username_0**: @RobJeffries: I thought that preventing people from applying Kepler's law and only rely on light from the surface to determine its mass is a daunting task...  
> **username_1**: It's not daunting - just imprecise.  
> **username_2**: Such stars are known as "runaway stars". https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1662.html  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-03-20. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

OK, I'll assume you are talking about [this star](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/runaway-star.html) or some other high-mass "runaway star".

Most massive stars are born in rich clusters and are often part of multiple system. Is not unusual for such stars to get ejected from these regions are high velocities, either as a result of dynamical interactions in multiple systems or when they are companions to stars that explode as supernovae.

The steps to estimate the mass are: (i) Obtain very detailed optical and UV spectroscopy. From this you estimate the spectral type of the star, it's effective temperature and its (current) mass-loss rate. (ii) You combine this with a known distance (the star in the link was in the Large Magellanic Cloud, so the distance was known fairly accurately) to estimate a luminosity. (iii) You compare the luminosity, temperature and mass-loss rate with the predictions of a specialised high-mass stellar evolutionary model, which includes mass-loss and rotation. The comparison yields an estimate of the mass and age of the star.

The details are found in [Evans et al. (2010)](http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715L..74E). It is probably fair to say that the estimate of $90\ M\_{\odot}$, is uncertain by a few tens of solar masses.


---

