<p>I think the answer is retrograde. </p>

<p>For Earth orbiting satellites, prograde means that when viewed from above the North Pole the satellite moves counterclockwise. However, when viewed from above the north Galactic Pole the solar system orbits clockwise. </p>

<p>Are these two norths consistent? Yes, even though the plane of the solar system is tilted by about 69 degrees from the plane of the Milky Way, it still "points north", as you suggest in your question. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-21T14:27:37.787Z
The question has nothing to do with the orientation of the solar system. It is about comparing the Galactic orbit of the Sun with the rotation of the Galaxy.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-23T01:41:01.267Z
It's all about definitions. Yes I agree that the sun orbits the Milky Way as most of the other stars and objects in the galaxy do. If that is defined as prograde, fine. But that is not the definition for orbits within the solar system or with Earth orbiting satellites. The definition within the solar system depends in the inclination angle i of the orbital plane. Less than 90 degrees is prograde, while greater than 90 degrees is retrograde. And i is measured with respect to the North Pole (of the earth or of the solar system).
Anthony Reynolds
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-23T01:41:28.507Z
Should the same definition be used for Galactic orbits? Perhaps, perhaps not. But the question was definitely about whether a similar definition applied to the sun's galactic orbit.
Anthony Reynolds
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-21T14:19:34.520Z
2018-01-21T14:19:34.520Z
Anthony Reynolds
<p>Prograde. This is usually the case for stars in spiral galaxies outside the most central regions.</p>

<p>A galaxy can be either <em>rotation-dominated</em> or <em>dispersion-dominated</em>, depending on whether its kinematics is dominated by ordered or random motion. Spiral galaxies such as the Milky Way belong to the first class, while ellipticals belong to the second. Irregular galaxies can be somewhere in between, with random motions but with an overall rotation.</p>

<p>In spirals, stars and gas generally rotate in the same direction (although they can have more random motion in their bulges, i.e. in the central parts). The Sun follows the overall rotation of the Milky Way, except for roughly 20 km/s in the direction wrt. the overall rotation; this direction is known as the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_apex" rel="noreferrer">Solar apex</a>.</p>

<p>However, following a major merger event, the product can be two kinematically decoupled components. This is described well in <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1263v1" rel="noreferrer">Corsini (2014)</a>. Such a merger is required to perturb the system sufficiently.</p>

<p>On smaller scales, however, the turbulence of the gas clouds giving birth to stars are more random. Hence the rotation of a star may very well be in another direction than the overall disk rotation. As you say, the plane of the Solar System is tilted by 63º wrt. the plane of the Milky Way, in the direction that the Sun is traveling. This can be seen e.g. in this infrared IRAS image, where the angle between the bright Milky Way disk and the blue stripes — which is emission from dust in the plane of the Solar System — crosses at roughly 60º:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/iwvR8.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/iwvR8.jpg" alt="IRAS"></a></p>

<p><sup>credit: <a href="http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/image_galleries/IRAS/allsky.html" rel="noreferrer">Caltech</a>.</sup></p>

<p>The rotation of the Sun is also prograde wrt. the Milky Way (or else we would say that the tilt was 180º – 63º = 117º).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-06T08:55:07.900Z
2017-06-06T10:57:22.370Z
2017-06-06T10:57:22.370Z
pela
<p>I recently learned about the terms <em>prograde</em> and <em>retrograde</em>. I've seen these terms used to describe the rotations and orbits of moons with respect to their planet, and planets with respect to their star. But I haven't been able to find what the relationship is between the rotation and orbit of the Sun with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way.</p>

<p>So, basically what I'm trying to do here is ask two questions:</p>

<ol>
<li>Is the orbit of the Sun around the center of the Milky Way prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?</li>
<li>Is the axial rotation of the Sun prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?</li>
</ol>

<p>Regarding question #2, I know it might be considered a slightly weird question to ask, simply because the plane of the Solar System is significantly tilted relative to the plane of the Milky Way (by about 60°), and furthermore the Sun itself has its equatorial plane tilted by a few more degrees relative to the plane of the Solar System (about 7°). But if we mentally "flatten out" the Solar System such that the Sun's equatorial plane aligns with the plane of the Milky Way, then we can talk about whether its axial rotation is in the same direction as the rotation of the Milky Way, so I think this is a valid application of the concept.</p>

<the-sun><orbit><milky-way><rotation>
Is the Sun prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?
bgoldst
# Is the Sun prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-06-06)

I recently learned about the terms *prograde* and *retrograde*. I've seen these terms used to describe the rotations and orbits of moons with respect to their planet, and planets with respect to their star. But I haven't been able to find what the relationship is between the rotation and orbit of the Sun with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way.

So, basically what I'm trying to do here is ask two questions:

1. Is the orbit of the Sun around the center of the Milky Way prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?
2. Is the axial rotation of the Sun prograde or retrograde with respect to the rotation of the Milky Way?

Regarding question #2, I know it might be considered a slightly weird question to ask, simply because the plane of the Solar System is significantly tilted relative to the plane of the Milky Way (by about 60°), and furthermore the Sun itself has its equatorial plane tilted by a few more degrees relative to the plane of the Solar System (about 7°). But if we mentally "flatten out" the Solar System such that the Sun's equatorial plane aligns with the plane of the Milky Way, then we can talk about whether its axial rotation is in the same direction as the rotation of the Milky Way, so I think this is a valid application of the concept.

**Tags:** the-sun, orbit, milky-way, rotation

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-06-06. Score: 11 | Accepted answer

Prograde. This is usually the case for stars in spiral galaxies outside the most central regions.

A galaxy can be either *rotation-dominated* or *dispersion-dominated*, depending on whether its kinematics is dominated by ordered or random motion. Spiral galaxies such as the Milky Way belong to the first class, while ellipticals belong to the second. Irregular galaxies can be somewhere in between, with random motions but with an overall rotation.

In spirals, stars and gas generally rotate in the same direction (although they can have more random motion in their bulges, i.e. in the central parts). The Sun follows the overall rotation of the Milky Way, except for roughly 20 km/s in the direction wrt. the overall rotation; this direction is known as the [Solar apex](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_apex).

However, following a major merger event, the product can be two kinematically decoupled components. This is described well in [Corsini (2014)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1263v1). Such a merger is required to perturb the system sufficiently.

On smaller scales, however, the turbulence of the gas clouds giving birth to stars are more random. Hence the rotation of a star may very well be in another direction than the overall disk rotation. As you say, the plane of the Solar System is tilted by 63º wrt. the plane of the Milky Way, in the direction that the Sun is traveling. This can be seen e.g. in this infrared IRAS image, where the angle between the bright Milky Way disk and the blue stripes — which is emission from dust in the plane of the Solar System — crosses at roughly 60º:

[![IRAS](https://i.sstatic.net/iwvR8.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/iwvR8.jpg)

credit: [Caltech](http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/image_galleries/IRAS/allsky.html).

The rotation of the Sun is also prograde wrt. the Milky Way (or else we would say that the tilt was 180º – 63º = 117º).


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-01-21. Score: -2

I think the answer is retrograde.

For Earth orbiting satellites, prograde means that when viewed from above the North Pole the satellite moves counterclockwise. However, when viewed from above the north Galactic Pole the solar system orbits clockwise.

Are these two norths consistent? Yes, even though the plane of the solar system is tilted by about 69 degrees from the plane of the Milky Way, it still "points north", as you suggest in your question.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: The question has nothing to do with the orientation of the solar system. It is about comparing the Galactic orbit of the Sun with the rotation of the Galaxy.  
> **username_1**: It's all about definitions. Yes I agree that the sun orbits the Milky Way as most of the other stars and objects in the galaxy do. If that is defined as prograde, fine. But that is not the definition for orbits within the solar system or with Earth orbiting satellites. The definition within the solar system depends in the inclination angle i of the orbital plane. Less than 90 degrees is prograde, while greater than 90 degrees is retrograde. And i is measured with respect to the North Pole (of the earth or of the solar system).  
> **username_1**: Should the same definition be used for Galactic orbits? Perhaps, perhaps not. But the question was definitely about whether a similar definition applied to the sun's galactic orbit.  

---

