<p>No, a star passing through the barrycenter or anywhere between the stars or nearby wouldn't send the stars flying away nor would it cancel out anything.  The effect would depend on how large your passing through star was, how fast it passed through and from what angle it approached, that is, how close it passed to each of the Alpha Centauri stars.   </p>

<p>How much of a kick or push it gives each object would depend on the relative direction, speed and distance and the gravitation or mass of your passing star, so it might pull the stars closer together, it might push them father apart, but in that would just be adding a vector to the motion of the stars that was already present.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-13T01:11:45.530Z
Yeah. Basically it depends on all parameters: masses, speeds and positions of all stars involved. It's a nice topic for a computer simulation.
Florin Andrei
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-12T17:19:19.777Z
2018-04-12T17:19:19.777Z
userLTK
<p>If you imagine all three stars have similar mass, which would be a normal thing to assume as a first approximation, and assuming the incident speed is larger than the orbital velocity (it likely would be, because it is getting pulled in), then the interaction would seem to be likely to happen with one of the stars in the binary, moreso than the other.  So for a short time, those two stars would behave like two objects undergoing "Rutherford scattering."  It would indeed depend sensitively on the details (especially the incident angle), but it does seem pretty likely to me that it would disrupt the initial binary.  It's possible that the interloping star could even grab one of the stars into a binary with itself, leaving the other one behind, but if the star comes in fast, it seems pretty likely that the original binary will at the very least be made highly eccentric, and quite likely disrupted altogether.  But yes, there's no substitute for an orbital simulation.</p>

<p>Now, it occurs to me you might be imagining the third star comes in along the axis of the original binary.  In that special case, the incident star would have <em>no effect at all</em> if the original binary had two equal mass stars in a circular orbit-- it would simply speed up the whole initial binary toward it, and then return it to its original movement after it passes.  But it wouldn't leave the stars moving-- it would erase its effect as it leaves, and all that would linger is an overall shift in the location of the barycenter.  But it's a very special case there.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-12T21:36:10.433Z
Are you sure about Rutherford scattering?    I don't want to say that's wrong, because in many ways the vast empty space is similar to the tiny nucleus of atoms that Rutherford experimented with but in Rutherford's case it was positive affecting positive with repulsion.  Gravity is always attractive.  Stealing a star is possible.   The 3 body situation allows for several ways it could go.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-12T20:23:29.560Z
2018-04-12T20:28:47.117Z
2018-04-12T20:28:47.117Z
Ken G
<p>If we assume the binary pair have equal masses, then by symmetry a star passing through their barycenter at right angles to their rotation plane will not change their symmetry. </p>

<p>I did some simple simulations where a star with mass 0.1 flies through a binary in an originally circular orbit.</p>

<p>The first case is with an interloper moving at speed 20. It passes through, losing a bit of momentum to the binary, that now moves slowly in the same direction.
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/SCYKF.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/SCYKF.png" alt="Interloper moving at speed 20"></a></p>

<p>The second is an interloper moving more slowly, with speed 1. Now the binary moves along more, and the interaction causes a quasiperiodic oscillation in seimajor axis. <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/UZt7L.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/UZt7L.png" alt="Interloper moving at speed 1"></a></p>

<p>Just dropping the interloper with zero velocity makes it bound to the binary, oscillating back and forth, driving complex quasiperiodic or chaotic motion. <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/I3IGp.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/I3IGp.png" alt="Interloper moving at speed 0"></a></p>

<p>It is possible to make the pair scatter by throwing in a sufficiently heavy interloper with enough momentum that first drags the binaries close, transfers enough momentum to unbind the system, and then passes along. <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/7PPRw.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/7PPRw.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>Of course, if the direction is not exactly symmetric things can turn messy. Note that there are non-chaotic solutions too. <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Qg9p0.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Qg9p0.png" alt="Misaligned interloper"></a></p>

<p>To sum up, interlopers can deposit energy and momentum, split binaries, or create chaotic tangles. But it is not the barycenter that is the important part. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-13T19:27:21.393Z
Very nicely done.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-05T22:35:26.310Z
only slightly related (squiggles): [“Pythagorean Three Body Problem” - need some points from an accurate solution for comparison](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/15364/12102) I found out that plug-and-play ODE solvers don't always give the best results when there are close approaches, which I think is called a "stiff problem"? (also [see](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1536162/284619))
uhoh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-13T00:11:32.220Z
2018-04-13T00:11:32.220Z
Anders Sandberg
<p>I was doing some research on Alpha Centauri A and B, and thought to myself: 'What would happen if something passed directly through the barycenter of these two stars?' I may theorise that a passing star will offset the barycenter with its gravity, sending the two stars in whatever direction it would go. I am not certain about this, nor am I certain that anyone has the answer. But if they do, please answer, I'd really like to know!</p>

<star>
What would happen if a star passed through the barycenter of two binary stars?
Commander KJ
# What would happen if a star passed through the barycenter of two binary stars?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-12)

I was doing some research on Alpha Centauri A and B, and thought to myself: 'What would happen if something passed directly through the barycenter of these two stars?' I may theorise that a passing star will offset the barycenter with its gravity, sending the two stars in whatever direction it would go. I am not certain about this, nor am I certain that anyone has the answer. But if they do, please answer, I'd really like to know!

**Tags:** star

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-04-13. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

If we assume the binary pair have equal masses, then by symmetry a star passing through their barycenter at right angles to their rotation plane will not change their symmetry.

I did some simple simulations where a star with mass 0.1 flies through a binary in an originally circular orbit.

The first case is with an interloper moving at speed 20. It passes through, losing a bit of momentum to the binary, that now moves slowly in the same direction.
[![Interloper moving at speed 20](https://i.sstatic.net/SCYKF.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/SCYKF.png)

The second is an interloper moving more slowly, with speed 1. Now the binary moves along more, and the interaction causes a quasiperiodic oscillation in seimajor axis. [![Interloper moving at speed 1](https://i.sstatic.net/UZt7L.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/UZt7L.png)

Just dropping the interloper with zero velocity makes it bound to the binary, oscillating back and forth, driving complex quasiperiodic or chaotic motion. [![Interloper moving at speed 0](https://i.sstatic.net/I3IGp.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/I3IGp.png)

It is possible to make the pair scatter by throwing in a sufficiently heavy interloper with enough momentum that first drags the binaries close, transfers enough momentum to unbind the system, and then passes along. [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/7PPRw.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/7PPRw.png)

Of course, if the direction is not exactly symmetric things can turn messy. Note that there are non-chaotic solutions too. [![Misaligned interloper](https://i.sstatic.net/Qg9p0.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/Qg9p0.png)

To sum up, interlopers can deposit energy and momentum, split binaries, or create chaotic tangles. But it is not the barycenter that is the important part.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Very nicely done.  
> **username_5**: only slightly related (squiggles): [“Pythagorean Three Body Problem” - need some points from an accurate solution for comparison](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/15364/12102) I found out that plug-and-play ODE solvers don't always give the best results when there are close approaches, which I think is called a "stiff problem"? (also [see](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1536162/284619))  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-04-12. Score: 1

No, a star passing through the barrycenter or anywhere between the stars or nearby wouldn't send the stars flying away nor would it cancel out anything. The effect would depend on how large your passing through star was, how fast it passed through and from what angle it approached, that is, how close it passed to each of the Alpha Centauri stars.

How much of a kick or push it gives each object would depend on the relative direction, speed and distance and the gravitation or mass of your passing star, so it might pull the stars closer together, it might push them father apart, but in that would just be adding a vector to the motion of the stars that was already present.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Yeah. Basically it depends on all parameters: masses, speeds and positions of all stars involved. It's a nice topic for a computer simulation.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-04-12. Score: 1

If you imagine all three stars have similar mass, which would be a normal thing to assume as a first approximation, and assuming the incident speed is larger than the orbital velocity (it likely would be, because it is getting pulled in), then the interaction would seem to be likely to happen with one of the stars in the binary, moreso than the other. So for a short time, those two stars would behave like two objects undergoing "Rutherford scattering." It would indeed depend sensitively on the details (especially the incident angle), but it does seem pretty likely to me that it would disrupt the initial binary. It's possible that the interloping star could even grab one of the stars into a binary with itself, leaving the other one behind, but if the star comes in fast, it seems pretty likely that the original binary will at the very least be made highly eccentric, and quite likely disrupted altogether. But yes, there's no substitute for an orbital simulation.

Now, it occurs to me you might be imagining the third star comes in along the axis of the original binary. In that special case, the incident star would have *no effect at all* if the original binary had two equal mass stars in a circular orbit-- it would simply speed up the whole initial binary toward it, and then return it to its original movement after it passes. But it wouldn't leave the stars moving-- it would erase its effect as it leaves, and all that would linger is an overall shift in the location of the barycenter. But it's a very special case there.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Are you sure about Rutherford scattering?    I don't want to say that's wrong, because in many ways the vast empty space is similar to the tiny nucleus of atoms that Rutherford experimented with but in Rutherford's case it was positive affecting positive with repulsion.  Gravity is always attractive.  Stealing a star is possible.   The 3 body situation allows for several ways it could go.  

---

