<p>The fact that the perihelion is close to the the winter solstice is purely coincidental. The perihelion might occur in any season. It wanders around in a somewhat chaotic fashion because of the gravitational <a href="http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/perihelion-aphelion-solstice.html" rel="noreferrer">influence of the other planets</a>. At the moment the perihelion moves a day every 58 years.</p>

<p>Let A = Earths axis, and E = the line perpendicular to the orbital plane. The angle between A and E is called the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_tilt" rel="noreferrer">axial tilt</a>. Let S = the line between the centers of the Earth and the Sun. Let P = the plane containing S and E. </p>

<p>Q1 is (maybe) asking what is the angle between A and P on Jan 2. It will be about 23.4 times sine(2*pi*12/365).  Because there are 12 days from Dec 21 to Jan 2.</p>

<p>Q2. yes.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-30T23:34:57.380Z
John Henckel: thank you - you understood Q1 perfectly. So this means 1. In the summer and winter solstices, the angle between A and P is 0 (Equivalently, the plane P contains A).  2. For the winter solstice, Earth is tilted such that South Pole is closer to the Sun than the North Pole (I deduce this from the images of Earth's tilt and seasonal temperatures). Am I right on both accounts?
user4624937
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-30T23:38:05.457Z
Another followup if you don't mind - how do we know P contains A at the solstices (my statement #1 above)? Are there any sources stating this, or is this implicit in how the term "axial tilt" is defined - does the term always refer to the tilt of the planet in the plane P at the solstices?
user4624937
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-01T17:20:41.367Z
@user4624937 yes, correct on both. "solstice" is defined as the day when the sun is lowest (or highest) in the sky, which implies that A is in P. I think it is obvious?
John Henckel
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-01T17:59:04.993Z
John - okay, this makes sense.
user4624937
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-30T19:01:25.683Z
2015-11-30T19:01:25.683Z
John Henckel
<p>It’s well-known that the axial tilt of the Earth (with respect to the ecliptic) is about 23.4 degrees. However, two angles is needed to specify the orientation of any rigid body, so it’s unclear to me exactly how Earth is oriented with respect to its orbital plane.</p>

<p>To be more precise, consider the plane that satisfies these two conditions:<br>
1. Perpendicular to the ecliptic plane<br>
2. Contains the line connecting the Sun and the Earth when Earth is at perihelion (Jan. 2).</p>

<p>(Basically, this plane cuts through the orbit of the Earth such that for half the year Earth is one side and for the other half Earth is on the other side.)</p>

<p>Questions:<br>
1. When the Earth is at perihelion, what is the angle between its rotational axis and the plane described above? I would guess this angle is very small from the images of Earth’s orbit. Is there a technical term for this angle?<br>
2. Does the direction of the axis remain approximately the same throughout its entire orbit?</p>

<p>Please ignore precession for this question.</p>

<orbit><earth><rotation>
Ambiguity in Earth's "Tilt"
user4624937
# Ambiguity in Earth's "Tilt"

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-11-30)

It’s well-known that the axial tilt of the Earth (with respect to the ecliptic) is about 23.4 degrees. However, two angles is needed to specify the orientation of any rigid body, so it’s unclear to me exactly how Earth is oriented with respect to its orbital plane.

To be more precise, consider the plane that satisfies these two conditions:  
1. Perpendicular to the ecliptic plane  
2. Contains the line connecting the Sun and the Earth when Earth is at perihelion (Jan. 2).

(Basically, this plane cuts through the orbit of the Earth such that for half the year Earth is one side and for the other half Earth is on the other side.)

Questions:  
1. When the Earth is at perihelion, what is the angle between its rotational axis and the plane described above? I would guess this angle is very small from the images of Earth’s orbit. Is there a technical term for this angle?  
2. Does the direction of the axis remain approximately the same throughout its entire orbit?

Please ignore precession for this question.

**Tags:** orbit, earth, rotation

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-11-30. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

The fact that the perihelion is close to the the winter solstice is purely coincidental. The perihelion might occur in any season. It wanders around in a somewhat chaotic fashion because of the gravitational [influence of the other planets](http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/perihelion-aphelion-solstice.html). At the moment the perihelion moves a day every 58 years.

Let A = Earths axis, and E = the line perpendicular to the orbital plane. The angle between A and E is called the [axial tilt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_tilt). Let S = the line between the centers of the Earth and the Sun. Let P = the plane containing S and E.

Q1 is (maybe) asking what is the angle between A and P on Jan 2. It will be about 23.4 times sine(2\*pi\*12/365). Because there are 12 days from Dec 21 to Jan 2.

Q2. yes.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: John Henckel: thank you - you understood Q1 perfectly. So this means 1. In the summer and winter solstices, the angle between A and P is 0 (Equivalently, the plane P contains A).  2. For the winter solstice, Earth is tilted such that South Pole is closer to the Sun than the North Pole (I deduce this from the images of Earth's tilt and seasonal temperatures). Am I right on both accounts?  
> **username_0**: Another followup if you don't mind - how do we know P contains A at the solstices (my statement #1 above)? Are there any sources stating this, or is this implicit in how the term "axial tilt" is defined - does the term always refer to the tilt of the planet in the plane P at the solstices?  
> **username_1**: @user4624937 yes, correct on both. "solstice" is defined as the day when the sun is lowest (or highest) in the sky, which implies that A is in P. I think it is obvious?  
> **username_0**: John - okay, this makes sense.  

---

