<p>Well, given that we can see the stars and that the Oort "cloud" is closer than the nearest star, then the answer to your main question is obviously that the "cloud" is not opaque.</p>

<p>I think it is called a cloud because it consists of many individual, small "particles" that don't interact with each other. Also, the term cloud avoids giving the impression that the Oort objects are arranged in any disk-like configuration - they should be much more spherically symmetric. The word cloud also avoids giving the impression that the objects fall between two relatively tight orbital radius limits. i.e. The Oort <em>cloud</em> is not like the Kuiper <em>belt</em>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-01T23:30:30.697Z
2015-04-01T23:30:30.697Z
ProfRob
<p>"Cloud" distinguishes the Oort Cloud as a 3-dimensional sphere of objects and not a disk like the orbital plane of the planets.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-02T01:05:56.550Z
This is kinda what Rob said in the last paragraph of his answer.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-02T00:45:41.460Z
2015-04-02T00:45:41.460Z
PJS1987
<p>I did read several of the Oort Cloud questions/answers which I found very helpful and instructive, but this question still persists for me:</p>

<p>Is the Oort Cloud actually opaque, or is the "cloud" used euphemistically because minor planets inside of it are too dim to be seen?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-01T17:26:18.677Z
You can see stars and galaxies through it, so it's not opaque. Not a euphemism, cloud is being used as in "a large number of things (such as insects) that move together through the air in a group" http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cloud
Wayfaring Stranger
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-01T19:22:49.110Z
Excellent answer. You should upgrade it to one.
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-01T21:40:07.543Z
@WayfaringStranger: Except that it doesn't move "through the air". (Not all dictionary definitions are perfect.)
Keith Thompson
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-01T22:11:42.260Z
Luminiferous aether, air, tomato, tomahto. ;-)
Wayfaring Stranger
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-02T10:15:09.503Z
Both answers are very helpful, (above and @rob jefries) expands my understanding much more!
AOC
<universe><oort-cloud>
Is the Oort Cloud actually opaque, or is the "cloud" used euphemistically because minor planets inside of it are too dim to be seen?
AOC
# Is the Oort Cloud actually opaque, or is the "cloud" used euphemistically because minor planets inside of it are too dim to be seen?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-01)

I did read several of the Oort Cloud questions/answers which I found very helpful and instructive, but this question still persists for me:

Is the Oort Cloud actually opaque, or is the "cloud" used euphemistically because minor planets inside of it are too dim to be seen?

**Tags:** universe, oort-cloud
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: You can see stars and galaxies through it, so it's not opaque. Not a euphemism, cloud is being used as in "a large number of things (such as insects) that move together through the air in a group" http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cloud  
> **username_2**: Excellent answer. You should upgrade it to one.  
> **username_3**: @WayfaringStranger: Except that it doesn't move "through the air". (Not all dictionary definitions are perfect.)  
> **username_1**: Luminiferous aether, air, tomato, tomahto. ;-)  
> **username_0**: Both answers are very helpful, (above and @rob jefries) expands my understanding much more!  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-04-01. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Well, given that we can see the stars and that the Oort "cloud" is closer than the nearest star, then the answer to your main question is obviously that the "cloud" is not opaque.

I think it is called a cloud because it consists of many individual, small "particles" that don't interact with each other. Also, the term cloud avoids giving the impression that the Oort objects are arranged in any disk-like configuration - they should be much more spherically symmetric. The word cloud also avoids giving the impression that the objects fall between two relatively tight orbital radius limits. i.e. The Oort *cloud* is not like the Kuiper *belt*.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-04-02. Score: 0

"Cloud" distinguishes the Oort Cloud as a 3-dimensional sphere of objects and not a disk like the orbital plane of the planets.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: This is kinda what Rob said in the last paragraph of his answer.  

---

