<p>It's a giant planet and it's young. p.3 of the paper you reference gives a likely age of 16 million years.</p>

<p>The heat arises from gravitational contraction and it would be a similar temperature even if it were further away from the stars.</p>

<p>When a ball of gas contracts, the virial theorem establishes that half the gravitational potential lost is radiated away and half heats up the gas.</p>

<p>Jupiter would also have been much hotter in the past and even now emits more radiation than it receives from the Sun. The rate of contraction (and hence the planet's luminosity and temperature) decreases as the planet ages.</p>

<p>Direct imaging surveys for giant planets deliberately target young stars for this reason.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-17T13:01:22.327Z
Wow that's interesting. Shouldn't that open a different window for habitable zones in star systems? Anyway - thanks for the clear explanation!
Mario Krenn
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-17T17:32:07.560Z
@NicoDean The luminosity of a contracting giant planet will be $\propto t^{-1}$ (roughly), so an object (moon) in a "habitable zone" now around the giant planet would not stay habitable for very long.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-17T08:14:16.157Z
2016-07-17T08:22:49.750Z
2016-07-17T08:22:49.750Z
ProfRob
<p>Recently, a fascinating triple-star system with an exoplanet has been <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/07/06/science.aaf9671" rel="nofollow">discovered</a> (<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02525" rel="nofollow">arxiv</a>). </p>

<p>I'm very surprised about the temperature of the exoplanet: it is roughly 850 kelvin, even though its orbit is ~82 AU away from the main star (~1.5 $M_☉$), and >250 AU from the other two stars. The planet itself has ~4 jupiter-masses.</p>

<p>Why can such a planet be so hot, for instance compared to Jupiter? I would have expected it to be very cold because it loses a lot of energy via radiation (that's actually the reason why the group discovered it via direct imaging), and it does not get much energy from its stars.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-17T08:06:03.933Z
The atmospheric composition of that planet consists of water and methane. That could be the reason why it has that temperature, considering methane can trap heat far better than CO2.
CipherBot
<exoplanet><temperature><star-systems>
Why is the exoplanet HD 131399Ab so hot?
Mario Krenn
# Why is the exoplanet HD 131399Ab so hot?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-07-17)

Recently, a fascinating triple-star system with an exoplanet has been [discovered](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/07/06/science.aaf9671) ([arxiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02525)).

I'm very surprised about the temperature of the exoplanet: it is roughly 850 kelvin, even though its orbit is ~82 AU away from the main star (~1.5 $M\_☉$), and >250 AU from the other two stars. The planet itself has ~4 jupiter-masses.

Why can such a planet be so hot, for instance compared to Jupiter? I would have expected it to be very cold because it loses a lot of energy via radiation (that's actually the reason why the group discovered it via direct imaging), and it does not get much energy from its stars.

**Tags:** exoplanet, temperature, star-systems
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The atmospheric composition of that planet consists of water and methane. That could be the reason why it has that temperature, considering methane can trap heat far better than CO2.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-07-17. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

It's a giant planet and it's young. p.3 of the paper you reference gives a likely age of 16 million years.

The heat arises from gravitational contraction and it would be a similar temperature even if it were further away from the stars.

When a ball of gas contracts, the virial theorem establishes that half the gravitational potential lost is radiated away and half heats up the gas.

Jupiter would also have been much hotter in the past and even now emits more radiation than it receives from the Sun. The rate of contraction (and hence the planet's luminosity and temperature) decreases as the planet ages.

Direct imaging surveys for giant planets deliberately target young stars for this reason.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Wow that's interesting. Shouldn't that open a different window for habitable zones in star systems? Anyway - thanks for the clear explanation!  
> **username_2**: @NicoDean The luminosity of a contracting giant planet will be $\propto t^{-1}$ (roughly), so an object (moon) in a "habitable zone" now around the giant planet would not stay habitable for very long.  

---

