<p>Just because a planet is in the "Habitable zone" doesn't mean it is habitable. A planet is said to be in the habitable zone if it is possible for liquid water to exist on the surface. A planet may be in the habitable zone, and yet not be habitable if, for instance, it's atmospheric pressure is too low (like Mars) or too high (like Venus), both of which are in the habitable zone of the Sun.</p>

<p>A star may be unsuitable for life for other reasons: it may be prone to extreme flares, for example. A blue giant is a star that burns bright and dies young, only lasting a few million years. Planets around such a star would have only just formed (they may still have molten surfaces). Blue giants tend to be unstable, being variable over a range of timescales, and ejecting large amounts of matter into space.</p>

<p>So while there would be a region which is "habitable" in the sense that the surface temperature of a planet could be in the range 0-100, you wouldn't expect such a planet to actually be suitable for life.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-03T12:11:45.927Z
You probably wanted to say "a few *hundred* million years". Still, I agree it is a too short time for *humans* to exist. Life can be a different thing.
Py-ser
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-03T16:29:53.740Z
Interesting, thanks! In my research, I heard that the habitable zone for a blue giant star would be so far away that the planet would hardly receive any visible light, is this also true?
CyberneticFen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-03T16:46:30.500Z
Blue Giants are very powerful and very bright. If you are so far from the star that you receive almost no light, you are too far to be warm, so not in the habitable zone. The largest hottest stars can have lifetimes of 10^7 years eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hertzsprung-Russel_StarData.png
James K
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-03T01:52:12.230Z
2017-04-03T01:52:12.230Z
James K
<p>Or would the planet(s) need to be too far away for life to exist?</p>

<planet><habitable-zone>
Do blue giants have a habitable zone?
CyberneticFen
# Do blue giants have a habitable zone?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-03)

Or would the planet(s) need to be too far away for life to exist?

**Tags:** planet, habitable-zone

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-04-03. Score: 15 | Accepted answer

Just because a planet is in the "Habitable zone" doesn't mean it is habitable. A planet is said to be in the habitable zone if it is possible for liquid water to exist on the surface. A planet may be in the habitable zone, and yet not be habitable if, for instance, it's atmospheric pressure is too low (like Mars) or too high (like Venus), both of which are in the habitable zone of the Sun.

A star may be unsuitable for life for other reasons: it may be prone to extreme flares, for example. A blue giant is a star that burns bright and dies young, only lasting a few million years. Planets around such a star would have only just formed (they may still have molten surfaces). Blue giants tend to be unstable, being variable over a range of timescales, and ejecting large amounts of matter into space.

So while there would be a region which is "habitable" in the sense that the surface temperature of a planet could be in the range 0-100, you wouldn't expect such a planet to actually be suitable for life.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: You probably wanted to say "a few *hundred* million years". Still, I agree it is a too short time for *humans* to exist. Life can be a different thing.  
> **username_0**: Interesting, thanks! In my research, I heard that the habitable zone for a blue giant star would be so far away that the planet would hardly receive any visible light, is this also true?  
> **username_1**: Blue Giants are very powerful and very bright. If you are so far from the star that you receive almost no light, you are too far to be warm, so not in the habitable zone. The largest hottest stars can have lifetimes of 10^7 years eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hertzsprung-Russel_StarData.png  

---

