<p>The primary reason the Earth doesn't fall into the Sun is that it has a very large <em>tangential velocity</em> with which it is able to maintain an orbit. The physics is the same for describing satellites which we launch into orbit around the Earth. I've heard it described as such: "The ISS is falling towards the earth, but is moving forward so quickly that it continually misses." </p>

<p>In short, if you were to take a mass and insert it with zero velocity somewhere in the solar system, it would inevitably fall in towards the sun. But because almost all bodies in our solar system were formed from the same large clump of <em>rotating</em> gas and dust which due to conservation of angular momentum during its collapse both sped up and flattened into a disk, all of the solar system bodies (Earth, other planets, asteroids, etc), have enough forward velocity to continue orbiting the Sun without being pulled to the center. </p>

<p>From a physics perspective, you can see that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centripetal_force" rel="noreferrer">centripetal acceleration</a> is governed by the inward force of gravity, tangential to the direction of motion of moving objects. </p>

<p>In fact, the <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/parker-solar-probe" rel="noreferrer">Solar Parker Probe</a> which just launched is attempting to do exactly as you describe --- fall into the Sun (or well, get close, to take lots of measurements). To do so is actually difficult, because the probe, launching from Earth, has to <em>lose</em> roughly 30 km/s in velocity it already has (because that's the Earth's orbital velocity). </p>

<p>How it plans to do this is a cool story in and of itself, which you might be interested in, here's a good summary: <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/parker-solar-probe-launch-nasa/567197/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/parker-solar-probe-launch-nasa/567197/</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-08-22T15:21:50.467Z
2018-08-22T15:21:50.467Z
prappleizer
<p>If you make a physical model of that curvature as you see in <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTY1Kje0yLg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this video</a>, for instance, you see the model planet going around the model sun quite a few times before it finally hits it. The reason it hits at all is friction with the surface and the surrounding air, which doesn't apply to real planets, so they can orbit around and around for a long time without spiralling in. They are also helped by the fact they are very massive, so that what tiny amount of friction there is from interplanetary dust and such doesn't affect them much. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-08-22T15:53:31.913Z
2018-08-22T15:53:31.913Z
Steve Linton
<p>Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.(source -wikipedia)<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/cTxY3.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>Why it is moving on the boundary of that curvature, but not fall into the middle of that curvature and collide with sun?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-08-22T23:37:43.827Z
You could think of the Earth as a roulette ball spinning around the rim of a roulette wheel. In the roulette analogy the ball loses a lot of velocity due to friction and falls into the actual wheel, but in the case of the Earth, there's almost no friction and the mass is billions upon billions upon billions of times greater.
BillDOe
<orbit><gravity><cosmology><general-relativity>
Why does earth not collide with the sun?
Mark ellon
# Why does earth not collide with the sun?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-08-22)

Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.(source -wikipedia)![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/cTxY3.jpg)

Why it is moving on the boundary of that curvature, but not fall into the middle of that curvature and collide with sun?

**Tags:** orbit, gravity, cosmology, general-relativity
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: You could think of the Earth as a roulette ball spinning around the rim of a roulette wheel. In the roulette analogy the ball loses a lot of velocity due to friction and falls into the actual wheel, but in the case of the Earth, there's almost no friction and the mass is billions upon billions upon billions of times greater.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-08-22. Score: 8

The primary reason the Earth doesn't fall into the Sun is that it has a very large *tangential velocity* with which it is able to maintain an orbit. The physics is the same for describing satellites which we launch into orbit around the Earth. I've heard it described as such: "The ISS is falling towards the earth, but is moving forward so quickly that it continually misses."

In short, if you were to take a mass and insert it with zero velocity somewhere in the solar system, it would inevitably fall in towards the sun. But because almost all bodies in our solar system were formed from the same large clump of *rotating* gas and dust which due to conservation of angular momentum during its collapse both sped up and flattened into a disk, all of the solar system bodies (Earth, other planets, asteroids, etc), have enough forward velocity to continue orbiting the Sun without being pulled to the center.

From a physics perspective, you can see that [centripetal acceleration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centripetal_force) is governed by the inward force of gravity, tangential to the direction of motion of moving objects.

In fact, the [Solar Parker Probe](https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/parker-solar-probe) which just launched is attempting to do exactly as you describe --- fall into the Sun (or well, get close, to take lots of measurements). To do so is actually difficult, because the probe, launching from Earth, has to *lose* roughly 30 km/s in velocity it already has (because that's the Earth's orbital velocity).

How it plans to do this is a cool story in and of itself, which you might be interested in, here's a good summary: <https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/parker-solar-probe-launch-nasa/567197/>


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-08-22. Score: 1

If you make a physical model of that curvature as you see in [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTY1Kje0yLg), for instance, you see the model planet going around the model sun quite a few times before it finally hits it. The reason it hits at all is friction with the surface and the surrounding air, which doesn't apply to real planets, so they can orbit around and around for a long time without spiralling in. They are also helped by the fact they are very massive, so that what tiny amount of friction there is from interplanetary dust and such doesn't affect them much.


---

