<p>If the Moon was not tidally locked, it would mean that the Moon is in the wrong orbital distance from Earth. The Moon is tidally locked because it is close to the Earth. If the moon were closer, it would approach the Earth's roche limit, be torn apart, and its debris would become a ring for ~100-200 million years. If it were too far, it would continue to drift outward until it was free of Earths' gravity.</p>

<p>By being tidally locked, the Moon has been extending the Earth day by slowing down the Earth's spin, to about ~6 hours from an 18 hour day to a 24 hour day. This process will continue into the future until the Earth is also tidally locked with the Moon. The Moon, while in this state, has also stabilized the Earth's seasons by stabilizing the Earths' orbital axis.</p>

<p>Lastly, a possible indirect consequence would be upon human history. Mankind would have probably abandoned the celestial sphere model in favor of the spinning Earth model much sooner had they seen proof that a celestial body could spin and rotate, much like when Galileo saw that moons were orbiting Jupiter.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T00:10:42.493Z
The Moon is receding from Earth anyway; also, it would have to be quite close to Earth for the ROche limit to be an issue. Good answer otherwise, though; welcome to Astronomy!
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T00:30:13.250Z
The oceans will boil in a billion years and after that if the Earth survives (I believe it's expected to — solar mass loss will make the AU bigger) the land tides will be so small as to make the time to reach full tidal lock exceedingly long. Probably longer than it'd take for random perturbations by stars or planets to destroy the Earth-Moon orbit.
user6784
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T00:50:42.960Z
It took over 4 billion years to lengthen the day by only 6 hours after all, gravity is to the square root of the distance, the bulge-Earth separation is shortening, the tide bulge mass is shrinking to about the fourth power of the distance, and we still have almost 110 times more day lengthening to go, except that the month is constantly getting longer. Also, I recall now that the Moon will be lost if it ever gets to month=day, so the month will be at least 3 to 5 months at the point when it's stripped from Earth, but that's for a full Sun so maybe the Sun losing mass will make it stay longer.
user6784
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T10:04:39.087Z
I think there's some incorrect answers here, both in the answer and in the comments, but it's too much for 600 characters, I'm going to give a new answer.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T16:41:38.163Z
Yes, mistakes. The gravity is to the square of inverse distance. (I am a lazy man.) I Googled fourth power tides and got many books. Should've checked if cube power has more Google hits on the desktop version. The tidal bulge-Earth separation is decreasing in *angular size*, as viewed from the Moon. Also, the Hill Sphere is 4 lunar distances more or less so we'd need under *4/2* to *4/3* times the current lunar distance to keep it, except the future Sun's shedding mass will allow larger values. The Hill Sphere is not where solar attraction equals Earth's.
user6784
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-12T16:44:01.100Z
(more errata) Going from 26 to 27 days will clearly not be as hard as. 75 to 1.75, as rotation is almost halted by then, so it'll not take hundreds of times Earth's current age to reach tidal lock if the oceans could stay. However, they won't so it'll still take very very very long and solar system orbits are chaotic on that scale. It should take 2.1 bil. years to deoceanize. Maybe 1 bil. years is for the end of life. Or the 2 bil. guy forgot to account for the runaway greenhouse effect. Or 1 bil. is only protein denaturing temperature or end of macroscopic life. Now I will read your answer.
user6784
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-11T22:18:18.357Z
2015-06-11T22:18:18.357Z
Phuc H Duong
<blockquote>
<p>What would be the practical consequences (on earth) if the Moon was
not tidally locked?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Honestly, I think the consequences would be pretty small, except we'd see the dark side of the moon from time to time.   On the moon, the consequences would be bigger.</p>
<p>All tidally locked means is that the moon's rotation matches the moon's orbit, so that the same side of the moon always faces the earth.  If the moon wasn't tidally locked, it would spin from our point of view.  The moon spinning wouldn't affect the earth hardly at all - at least, in no way I can see.</p>
<p>The reason most moons are tidally locked to their planets is because the planets gravitation on their moons is quite large.  Strong gravitation, or, strong tidal effects is perhaps more correct, slows down an orbiting objects rotation, so tidal locking of moons is common.  Tidal locking of planets - less so.   Both Pluto and it's moon Charon are tidally locked to each other cause they're pretty close to each other.    Mercury is also, nearly tidally locked to our sun.</p>
<p>Now, Phuc's answer</p>
<blockquote>
<p>By being tidally locked, the Moon has been extending the Earth day by
slowing down the Earth's spin, to about ~6 hours from an 18 hour day
to a 24 hour day.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As HDE pointed out, this isn't so.   It's the earth's rotation being ahead of the moon's orbit that's caused the earth to slow down.   The moon's tidal effect on the earth plays a role in that, but the Moon being tidally locked to the earth is irrelevant.</p>
<p>Also, the earth's spin was much much faster than an 18 hour day when the moon was young.   By this article, a day on earth was only a few hours long.   <a href="http://sservi.nasa.gov/articles/nasa-scientist-jen-heldmann-describes-how-the-earths-moon-was-formed/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sservi.nasa.gov/articles/nasa-scientist-jen-heldmann-describes-how-the-earths-moon-was-formed/</a></p>
<p>The earth, 4 billion years ago was spinning unusually fast for an object in our solar system.  It might help to consider what makes planets spin.  When they form, it's conservation of angular momentum, but according to the giant impact hypothesis, the earth was hit, not dead center but at an angle.   The giant impact that formed the moon also set the earth spinning very fast.   The moon was also very close when it formed - maybe just twice the Roche limit, so, that close, that the moon slowed the earth's spin and the (at the time) much larger tidal effects pulled on the moon, causing it to move farther away.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2015-06-12T10:25:36.603Z
2020-06-28T17:39:15.763Z
2020-06-28T17:39:15.763Z
userLTK
<p>I was thinking about the fact that all the largest Solar System moons are tidally locked to its primary and this question arose.</p>

<the-moon><solar-system><earth>
What would be the practical consequences (on earth) if the Moon was not tidally locked?
Daphne
# What would be the practical consequences (on earth) if the Moon was not tidally locked?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-06-11)

I was thinking about the fact that all the largest Solar System moons are tidally locked to its primary and this question arose.

**Tags:** the-moon, solar-system, earth

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-06-12. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

> What would be the practical consequences (on earth) if the Moon was
> not tidally locked?

Honestly, I think the consequences would be pretty small, except we'd see the dark side of the moon from time to time. On the moon, the consequences would be bigger.

All tidally locked means is that the moon's rotation matches the moon's orbit, so that the same side of the moon always faces the earth. If the moon wasn't tidally locked, it would spin from our point of view. The moon spinning wouldn't affect the earth hardly at all - at least, in no way I can see.

The reason most moons are tidally locked to their planets is because the planets gravitation on their moons is quite large. Strong gravitation, or, strong tidal effects is perhaps more correct, slows down an orbiting objects rotation, so tidal locking of moons is common. Tidal locking of planets - less so. Both Pluto and it's moon Charon are tidally locked to each other cause they're pretty close to each other. Mercury is also, nearly tidally locked to our sun.

Now, Phuc's answer

> By being tidally locked, the Moon has been extending the Earth day by
> slowing down the Earth's spin, to about ~6 hours from an 18 hour day
> to a 24 hour day.

As HDE pointed out, this isn't so. It's the earth's rotation being ahead of the moon's orbit that's caused the earth to slow down. The moon's tidal effect on the earth plays a role in that, but the Moon being tidally locked to the earth is irrelevant.

Also, the earth's spin was much much faster than an 18 hour day when the moon was young. By this article, a day on earth was only a few hours long. <http://sservi.nasa.gov/articles/nasa-scientist-jen-heldmann-describes-how-the-earths-moon-was-formed/>

The earth, 4 billion years ago was spinning unusually fast for an object in our solar system. It might help to consider what makes planets spin. When they form, it's conservation of angular momentum, but according to the giant impact hypothesis, the earth was hit, not dead center but at an angle. The giant impact that formed the moon also set the earth spinning very fast. The moon was also very close when it formed - maybe just twice the Roche limit, so, that close, that the moon slowed the earth's spin and the (at the time) much larger tidal effects pulled on the moon, causing it to move farther away.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-06-11. Score: 4

If the Moon was not tidally locked, it would mean that the Moon is in the wrong orbital distance from Earth. The Moon is tidally locked because it is close to the Earth. If the moon were closer, it would approach the Earth's roche limit, be torn apart, and its debris would become a ring for ~100-200 million years. If it were too far, it would continue to drift outward until it was free of Earths' gravity.

By being tidally locked, the Moon has been extending the Earth day by slowing down the Earth's spin, to about ~6 hours from an 18 hour day to a 24 hour day. This process will continue into the future until the Earth is also tidally locked with the Moon. The Moon, while in this state, has also stabilized the Earth's seasons by stabilizing the Earths' orbital axis.

Lastly, a possible indirect consequence would be upon human history. Mankind would have probably abandoned the celestial sphere model in favor of the spinning Earth model much sooner had they seen proof that a celestial body could spin and rotate, much like when Galileo saw that moons were orbiting Jupiter.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: The Moon is receding from Earth anyway; also, it would have to be quite close to Earth for the ROche limit to be an issue. Good answer otherwise, though; welcome to Astronomy!  
> **username_3**: The oceans will boil in a billion years and after that if the Earth survives (I believe it's expected to — solar mass loss will make the AU bigger) the land tides will be so small as to make the time to reach full tidal lock exceedingly long. Probably longer than it'd take for random perturbations by stars or planets to destroy the Earth-Moon orbit.  
> **username_3**: It took over 4 billion years to lengthen the day by only 6 hours after all, gravity is to the square root of the distance, the bulge-Earth separation is shortening, the tide bulge mass is shrinking to about the fourth power of the distance, and we still have almost 110 times more day lengthening to go, except that the month is constantly getting longer. Also, I recall now that the Moon will be lost if it ever gets to month=day, so the month will be at least 3 to 5 months at the point when it's stripped from Earth, but that's for a full Sun so maybe the Sun losing mass will make it stay longer.  
> **username_4**: I think there's some incorrect answers here, both in the answer and in the comments, but it's too much for 600 characters, I'm going to give a new answer.  
> **username_3**: Yes, mistakes. The gravity is to the square of inverse distance. (I am a lazy man.) I Googled fourth power tides and got many books. Should've checked if cube power has more Google hits on the desktop version. The tidal bulge-Earth separation is decreasing in *angular size*, as viewed from the Moon. Also, the Hill Sphere is 4 lunar distances more or less so we'd need under *4/2* to *4/3* times the current lunar distance to keep it, except the future Sun's shedding mass will allow larger values. The Hill Sphere is not where solar attraction equals Earth's.  
> **username_3**: (more errata) Going from 26 to 27 days will clearly not be as hard as. 75 to 1.75, as rotation is almost halted by then, so it'll not take hundreds of times Earth's current age to reach tidal lock if the oceans could stay. However, they won't so it'll still take very very very long and solar system orbits are chaotic on that scale. It should take 2.1 bil. years to deoceanize. Maybe 1 bil. years is for the end of life. Or the 2 bil. guy forgot to account for the runaway greenhouse effect. Or 1 bil. is only protein denaturing temperature or end of macroscopic life. Now I will read your answer.  

---

