<p>You can go outside tomorrow morning just before dawn (written 02/05/22), look at the spectacular array of planets (Venus, Jupiter, Saturn Mars) on show at the moment and confirm for yourself that they do not all lie in front of the Milky Way. Here is a star map (for London, tomorrow morning at about 04:30) making the point.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/s0QXk.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/s0QXk.png" alt="The sky at dawn 03/05/22" /></a></p>
<p>The array of planets defines the plane fo the Solar System (a handy ecliptic line is also shown in the picture). The plane of our Galaxy is marked by the Milky Way - also clearly visible (although possibly tricky just before dawn).</p>
<p>The point is, these planes do not line up at all. We think that the plane of the Solar System is randomly oriented with respect to the Galaxy. There have been no hints of systematic alignments for other planetary systems either. What we understand from this is that the process of star and planet formation takes place in turbulent environments within giant molecular clouds. The turbulence scrambles the angular momentum vectors of the collapsing clumps such that no alignment is expected.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-05-04T03:34:16.920Z
Thanks. I am sure you will feel irritated if I ask the "age old" question : "how can/do we know about our galaxy without going out of it?" But the question still remains to be answered convincingly for everyone. In general we (at least me for sure) tend to accept the answers given to such questions, because we do not have the IQ to understand the complexities of the subject, nor the physical means to verify the answer. I have one more question: How do we make sure that we avoid "Visual Illusions" like parallax errors etc? Can you guide on "what to read to remove such question?"
Niranjan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-05-02T19:22:50.223Z
2022-05-02T19:22:50.223Z
ProfRob
<p>We claim to have understood much about our galaxy without going beyond even our solar system - which is just a small portion in one of the arms of the galaxy. I assume that the plane in which planets move around the sun (the Eliptic) is also in the same plane in which all other arms of our galaxy rotate about its's center. Would our understanding about our galaxy different, if the two ecliptics would have intersected each other at some major angle?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-05-02T19:04:34.330Z
They already do. The galactic plane is inclined at approximately 60° to the ecliptic plane.
notovny
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-05-02T20:25:56.310Z
I'm not big on downvoting but I feel this question warrants a downvote. For one, it clearly indicates little to no research as they start by just assuming a false statement. A quick search on this exchange would've shown them [they were wrong](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/28071/in-which-direction-does-the-ecliptic-plane-make-an-angle-of-60-degrees-with-gala). Second, they proceed to ask a question based on that false assumption that then isn't really answerable. At best, one can interpret what the question would've been if their assumption was correct.
zephyr
<galaxy>
The plane of revolution of planets around the Sun, and that of the solar system around the center of Milky way
Niranjan
# The plane of revolution of planets around the Sun, and that of the solar system around the center of Milky way

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-05-02)

We claim to have understood much about our galaxy without going beyond even our solar system - which is just a small portion in one of the arms of the galaxy. I assume that the plane in which planets move around the sun (the Eliptic) is also in the same plane in which all other arms of our galaxy rotate about its's center. Would our understanding about our galaxy different, if the two ecliptics would have intersected each other at some major angle?

**Tags:** galaxy
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: They already do. The galactic plane is inclined at approximately 60° to the ecliptic plane.  
> **username_2**: I'm not big on downvoting but I feel this question warrants a downvote. For one, it clearly indicates little to no research as they start by just assuming a false statement. A quick search on this exchange would've shown them [they were wrong](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/28071/in-which-direction-does-the-ecliptic-plane-make-an-angle-of-60-degrees-with-gala). Second, they proceed to ask a question based on that false assumption that then isn't really answerable. At best, one can interpret what the question would've been if their assumption was correct.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2022-05-02. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

You can go outside tomorrow morning just before dawn (written 02/05/22), look at the spectacular array of planets (Venus, Jupiter, Saturn Mars) on show at the moment and confirm for yourself that they do not all lie in front of the Milky Way. Here is a star map (for London, tomorrow morning at about 04:30) making the point.

[![The sky at dawn 03/05/22](https://i.sstatic.net/s0QXk.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/s0QXk.png)

The array of planets defines the plane fo the Solar System (a handy ecliptic line is also shown in the picture). The plane of our Galaxy is marked by the Milky Way - also clearly visible (although possibly tricky just before dawn).

The point is, these planes do not line up at all. We think that the plane of the Solar System is randomly oriented with respect to the Galaxy. There have been no hints of systematic alignments for other planetary systems either. What we understand from this is that the process of star and planet formation takes place in turbulent environments within giant molecular clouds. The turbulence scrambles the angular momentum vectors of the collapsing clumps such that no alignment is expected.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks. I am sure you will feel irritated if I ask the "age old" question : "how can/do we know about our galaxy without going out of it?" But the question still remains to be answered convincingly for everyone. In general we (at least me for sure) tend to accept the answers given to such questions, because we do not have the IQ to understand the complexities of the subject, nor the physical means to verify the answer. I have one more question: How do we make sure that we avoid "Visual Illusions" like parallax errors etc? Can you guide on "what to read to remove such question?"  

---

