<p>The IAU does not give a definition of "asteroid" (in contrast to its defintion of "planet") The definition of "asteroid" is therefore determined by actual use, rather than a specific authoritative source.</p>

<p>The IAU in its <a href="https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/#minorplanets" rel="nofollow noreferrer">guidelines on "naming"</a> doesn't use the term "asteroid" (except qualified as "near earth asteroid". The term is somewhat ambiguous.  Instead it considers "planets", "dwarf planets" and "minor planets".</p>

<p><a href="https://minorplanetcenter.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Minor planets</a> can be dwarf planets, asteroids, trojans, centaurs, Kuiper belt objects, and other trans-Neptunian objects.</p>

<p>Initially solar system bodies were classed as "comet" (appears fuzzy due to a coma of dust and gas) "asteroid (appears star like, a single point of light with no fuzziness). The planets appear disc-like.</p>

<p>TNOs have no coma, but their surfaces are dominated by ices (and would start to evaporate if ever brought to the inner solar system).  Thus they are rather different from the traditional rocky asteroids.</p>

<p>So you should avoid using an unqualified "asteroid" as it may be ambiguous. You can say "minor planet" if you want to include both TNOs KBOs and classical asteroids.  Or "Main belt asteroid" for those between Mars and Jupiter. </p>

<p>If you read "asteroid" it would normally exclude the outer solar system bodies. But as it may be ambiguous, so read the context.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-20T07:38:07.080Z
I'll rephrase that.
James K
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-19T23:02:12.067Z
2018-11-20T07:33:36.520Z
2018-11-20T07:33:36.520Z
James K
<p>Are Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) asteroids?</p>

<p>Please, base your answer. If possible, give sources. Thanks.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-19T22:40:57.597Z
The way you've phrased this question is as if you're asking us to the homework.  What have you found about TNOs so far?
MiscellaneousUser
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-19T23:21:33.727Z
What? First Pluto is downgraded from planet to dwarf, and now it's merely an *asteroid*? [weeping sounds] ;-)
Chappo Hasn't Forgotten
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-20T23:11:20.587Z
@MiscellaneousUser I know that TNOs are small bodies, but I already heard astronomers referring to them as asteroids. That's why I asked, I thought maybe there was some kind of debate about that.
user140259
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-21T08:39:29.580Z
The term asteroid is considered to be discriminatory in these modern times. A better term is Solar System Object or minor planet, although minor planet is also considered disparaging by some.
Mick
<asteroids><trans-neptunian-object>
Are Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) asteroids?
user140259
# Are Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) asteroids?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-19)

Are Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) asteroids?

Please, base your answer. If possible, give sources. Thanks.

**Tags:** asteroids, trans-neptunian-object
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The way you've phrased this question is as if you're asking us to the homework.  What have you found about TNOs so far?  
> **username_2**: What? First Pluto is downgraded from planet to dwarf, and now it's merely an *asteroid*? [weeping sounds] ;-)  
> **username_0**: @MiscellaneousUser I know that TNOs are small bodies, but I already heard astronomers referring to them as asteroids. That's why I asked, I thought maybe there was some kind of debate about that.  
> **username_3**: The term asteroid is considered to be discriminatory in these modern times. A better term is Solar System Object or minor planet, although minor planet is also considered disparaging by some.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-11-19. Score: 1

The IAU does not give a definition of "asteroid" (in contrast to its defintion of "planet") The definition of "asteroid" is therefore determined by actual use, rather than a specific authoritative source.

The IAU in its [guidelines on "naming"](https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/#minorplanets) doesn't use the term "asteroid" (except qualified as "near earth asteroid". The term is somewhat ambiguous. Instead it considers "planets", "dwarf planets" and "minor planets".

[Minor planets](https://minorplanetcenter.net/) can be dwarf planets, asteroids, trojans, centaurs, Kuiper belt objects, and other trans-Neptunian objects.

Initially solar system bodies were classed as "comet" (appears fuzzy due to a coma of dust and gas) "asteroid (appears star like, a single point of light with no fuzziness). The planets appear disc-like.

TNOs have no coma, but their surfaces are dominated by ices (and would start to evaporate if ever brought to the inner solar system). Thus they are rather different from the traditional rocky asteroids.

So you should avoid using an unqualified "asteroid" as it may be ambiguous. You can say "minor planet" if you want to include both TNOs KBOs and classical asteroids. Or "Main belt asteroid" for those between Mars and Jupiter.

If you read "asteroid" it would normally exclude the outer solar system bodies. But as it may be ambiguous, so read the context.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: I'll rephrase that.  

---

