<p>Are these stars in this <a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/there-s-something-uncannily-familiar-about-the-rocks-on-distant-ryugu" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MASCOT image of Ryugu</a>?  </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/0XMq7.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/0XMq7.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a>
Larger image:
<a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/images/2019-08/processed/RocksOfRyuguStranglyFamiliar_1024.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.sciencealert.com/images/2019-08/processed/RocksOfRyuguStranglyFamiliar_1024.jpg</a></p>

<p>They seem too bright to be stars (if the foreground is sunlit) and there are similar bright spots in shadowed areas of Ryugu.</p>

<p>Famously  there are no stars visible in Apollo Moon photos:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time. If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars!<br>
  <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#starshttp://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#stars" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Phil Plait, Bad Astronomy</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Ryugu has half the albedo of the Moon, but that shouldn't make much difference.</p>

<p>@AtmosphericPrisonEscape suggests they may be dust particles as seen on Comet 67P.  However, the second video in <a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.in/viral-video-surface-comet-corrected-keep-stars-stationary-767824" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this article</a> shows that there are also stars in the 67P images. I can't tell whether the comet surface is in direct sunlight or reflected light.  Also, I don't know the dimensions of the parts of 67P and Ryugu depicted.</p>

<p>Paul Byrne
(@ThePlanetaryGuy, Associate Professor of Planetary Science at @NCState) <a href="https://twitter.com/ThePlanetaryGuy/status/1164663574008143872" rel="nofollow noreferrer">says</a> "I'm guessing those white dots are hot pixels" and "it looks like the foreground is an area around 40-ish centimeters (~16 inches) across" and "there are four LEDs as part of the camera system to illuminate the asteroid surface during night-time ops".</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Physically, these “warm/hot pixels” are mainly caused by charge leakages within the image sensor chip.
  Although the warm/hot pixels are randomly distributed within the chip, they are in a fixed position. Under normal
  conditions (shorter exposure times, normal light), many of them are not visible since their contribution to the
  general noise level is below this level.<br>
  <a href="https://www.pco.de/fileadmin/user_upload/db/download/kb_hot_pixel_20100813.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">pco.knowledge base | warm / hot pixel</a></p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-08-31T00:37:52.863Z
Dust particles reflecting light? We've seen a lot of them also on 67P...
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-01T02:26:07.370Z
@AtmosphericPrisonEscape [Video corrected to keep stars stationary](https://www.ibtimes.co.in/viral-video-surface-comet-corrected-keep-stars-stationary-767824) (scroll down to the second video).
Keith McClary
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-01T18:46:15.483Z
Please post the original source, if possible, not those 'hip viral !!!'!!!!11111 videos. Also I'm not sure if you're refuting or supporting my hypothesis, by just posting a link...
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-09-01T20:57:12.797Z
@AtmosphericPrisonEscape It seems that landru79 makes these from ESA images and posts them on Twitter. Mark (of ESA) commenting on the on the [first video](https://twitter.com/landru79/status/988490703075463168) says there are stars as well as dust specs.
Keith McClary
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-03T20:17:09.547Z
Raw [images here](http://europlanet.dlr.de/MASCAM/index.html) have "29464" in their names.
Mike G
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-16T04:05:18.847Z
astrometry.net (using cropped parts of the sky) did not recognise these "stars".
Keith McClary
<star><asteroids><photography>
Are these stars in MASCOT image of Ryugu?
Keith McClary
# Are these stars in MASCOT image of Ryugu?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-08-30)

Are these stars in this [MASCOT image of Ryugu](https://www.sciencealert.com/there-s-something-uncannily-familiar-about-the-rocks-on-distant-ryugu)?

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/0XMq7.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/0XMq7.jpg)
Larger image:
<https://www.sciencealert.com/images/2019-08/processed/RocksOfRyuguStranglyFamiliar_1024.jpg>

They seem too bright to be stars (if the foreground is sunlit) and there are similar bright spots in shadowed areas of Ryugu.

Famously there are no stars visible in Apollo Moon photos:

> the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time. If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars!  
> [Phil Plait, Bad Astronomy](http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#starshttp://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#stars)

Ryugu has half the albedo of the Moon, but that shouldn't make much difference.

@AtmosphericPrisonEscape suggests they may be dust particles as seen on Comet 67P. However, the second video in [this article](https://www.ibtimes.co.in/viral-video-surface-comet-corrected-keep-stars-stationary-767824) shows that there are also stars in the 67P images. I can't tell whether the comet surface is in direct sunlight or reflected light. Also, I don't know the dimensions of the parts of 67P and Ryugu depicted.

Paul Byrne
(@ThePlanetaryGuy, Associate Professor of Planetary Science at @NCState) [says](https://twitter.com/ThePlanetaryGuy/status/1164663574008143872) "I'm guessing those white dots are hot pixels" and "it looks like the foreground is an area around 40-ish centimeters (~16 inches) across" and "there are four LEDs as part of the camera system to illuminate the asteroid surface during night-time ops".

> Physically, these “warm/hot pixels” are mainly caused by charge leakages within the image sensor chip.
> Although the warm/hot pixels are randomly distributed within the chip, they are in a fixed position. Under normal
> conditions (shorter exposure times, normal light), many of them are not visible since their contribution to the
> general noise level is below this level.  
> [pco.knowledge base | warm / hot pixel](https://www.pco.de/fileadmin/user_upload/db/download/kb_hot_pixel_20100813.pdf)

**Tags:** star, asteroids, photography
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Dust particles reflecting light? We've seen a lot of them also on 67P...  
> **username_0**: @AtmosphericPrisonEscape [Video corrected to keep stars stationary](https://www.ibtimes.co.in/viral-video-surface-comet-corrected-keep-stars-stationary-767824) (scroll down to the second video).  
> **username_1**: Please post the original source, if possible, not those 'hip viral !!!'!!!!11111 videos. Also I'm not sure if you're refuting or supporting my hypothesis, by just posting a link...  
> **username_0**: @AtmosphericPrisonEscape It seems that landru79 makes these from ESA images and posts them on Twitter. Mark (of ESA) commenting on the on the [first video](https://twitter.com/landru79/status/988490703075463168) says there are stars as well as dust specs.  
> **username_2**: Raw [images here](http://europlanet.dlr.de/MASCAM/index.html) have "29464" in their names.  
> **username_0**: astrometry.net (using cropped parts of the sky) did not recognise these "stars".  

---

## 0 answers

