<p>Nothing will happen. Neither star is massive enough to become a supernova and their velocities relative to the Earth mean that we will almost certainly be hundereds of light years away from them when they become red giants.</p>

<p>A 1 km/s velocity difference over 100 million years leads to a distance difference of about 300 light years.</p>

<p>Both Procyon and Sirius are in binary systems with white dwarfs, but they are not close binary systems. It is possible, but unlikely, that their white dwarf companions could accrete sufficient material to cause a Type Ia supernova - a possibility I address in <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20122/will-sirius-b-start-accreting-from-a-and-become-a-supernova-type-ia">Will Sirius B start accreting from A and become a supernova type Ia?</a> but even then, as I said above, these stars will be nowhere near the Sun when that happens.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T16:22:57.287Z
2019-10-30T16:22:57.287Z
ProfRob
<p>Life on Earth will not be adversely affected when nearby stars become red giants.</p>
<p>Certainly, things will get very messy inside those systems: red giants throw out a <em>lot</em> of gas and dust. Red giants are a lot more luminous than the Sun because they have such a huge surface area, but they don't emit large amounts of dangerous radiation, like X-rays or ultraviolet light. In fact, a red giant is cooler than the Sun, so it emits relatively little UV light.</p>
<p>According to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_giant#Prospects_for_habitability" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia</a>, it's possible that a red giant system could even be habitable, so life in nearby systems should be quite safe.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Although traditionally it has been suggested the evolution of a star into a red giant will render its planetary system, if present, uninhabitable, some research suggests that, during the evolution of a 1 M☉ star along the red-giant branch, it could harbor a habitable zone for several billion years at 2 AU out to around 100 million years at 9 AU out, giving perhaps enough time for life to develop on a suitable world. After the red-giant stage, there would for such a star be a habitable zone between 7 and 22 AU for an additional billion years.
Later studies have refined this scenario, showing how for a 1 M☉ star the habitable zone lasts from <span class="math-container">$10^8$</span> years for a planet with an orbit similar to that of Mars to <span class="math-container">$2.1×10^8$</span> yr for one that orbits at Saturn's distance to the Sun, the maximum time (<span class="math-container">$3.7×10^8$</span> yr) corresponding for planets orbiting at the distance of Jupiter. However, for planets orbiting a 0.5 M☉ star in equivalent orbits to those of Jupiter and Saturn they would be in the habitable zone for <span class="math-container">$5.8×10^9$</span> yr and <span class="math-container">$2.1×10^9$</span> yr respectively; for stars more massive than the Sun, the times are considerably shorter.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<p>However, the Sirius and Procyon systems mentioned in the question are both binary systems, and both Sirius B and Procyon B are already white dwarfs. That makes the picture more complicated, and definitely more dangerous inside those systems, but neighboring stellar systems won't be harmed.</p>
<p>When Sirius A and Procyon A become red giants their white dwarf companions will get bombarded by a lot of material. If a white dwarf accretes enough hydrogen, it can lead to a runaway fusion reaction, in other words, a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova" rel="nofollow noreferrer">nova</a> explosion.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Hydrogen fusion may occur in a stable manner on the surface of the white dwarf for a narrow range of accretion rates, giving rise to a super soft X-ray source, but for most binary system parameters, the hydrogen burning is unstable thermally and rapidly converts a large amount of the hydrogen into other, heavier chemical elements in a runaway reaction, liberating an enormous amount of energy. This blows the remaining gases away from the surface of the white dwarf surface and produces an extremely bright outburst of light.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A nova is bright, but it only emits a tiny amount of energy compared to a supernova, and poses no danger to neighboring stellar systems.</p>
<p>Actually, it's very unlikely that either Sirius B or Procyon B will have nova events: they are simply too far from their companions to accrete enough hydrogen for that to occur. (Thanks to Peter Erwin for that info).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T14:52:09.560Z
The white dwarfs orbiting Sirius and Procyon are too far away from their primary stars for there to be a reasonable chance of accretion in the latters' red giant stages. Systems that *do* behave like that -- red giant + accreting white dwarf -- are called symbiotic stars (the nova outbursts are called symbiotic novae), and they require orbits with periods of < 15-20 years. The periods of Procyon A&B and Sirius A&B are 41 and 50 years, respectively, so no symbiotic novae are likely.
Peter Erwin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T15:01:03.090Z
Thanks, @Peter. Edited.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T16:26:03.747Z
@PeterErwin There is a chance that Procyon and SIrius B will accrete significant amounts of material in the AGB phase. Such mass accretion from the *slow* wind of an AGB star is well known and modelled. It results for instance in the class of stars known as barium dwarfs. I agree with PM2Ring though that such accretion is unlikely to result in a Type Ia supernova, but not necessarily because the mass isn't accreted.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T18:10:25.760Z
@RobJeffries -- True, I was mainly commenting on the red giant phase. Still, given the relatively wide nature of both binaries, would the wind accretion be enough to result in nova outbursts? (Which is what PM 2Ring was discussing.)
Peter Erwin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-31T07:39:51.500Z
@PeterErwin that depends on the wind speed. There are many stars known in wide binaries with white dwarfs, where the "normal star"  appears to have accreted a significant fraction of its mass from the WD progenitor. Symbiotic Novae are binaries featuring an AGB star.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-31T07:46:03.170Z
@PeterErwin correction. D-type symbiotic binaries (the ones with long orbital periods) contain AGB stars.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T12:49:03.730Z
2024-01-08T22:43:18.640Z
2024-01-08T22:43:18.640Z
PM 2Ring
<p>What will happen if close stars like Sirius A or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procyon#Procyon_A" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Procyon_A</a> become red giants? Is it dangerous for the Earth and life on it?</p>

<p>If for Sirius A we still have 500-800 million years, but Procyon A might become a red giant in 10 to 100 million years, by astronomical scale it is very soon.</p>

<p>Or nothing will happen with the Earth, because it is still too far?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-30T14:57:11.303Z
Note that 100 million years means the Sun will have moved about halfway around the center of the Milky Way in its orbit, and it's rather difficult to predict where Sirius or Procyon will be at that point, though they'll probably be a bit further away from the Sun than they are now.
Peter Erwin
<star><stellar-evolution>
Will it be dangerous when close stars become Red Giants?
Zlelik
# Will it be dangerous when close stars become Red Giants?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-10-30)

What will happen if close stars like Sirius A or [Procyon\_A](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procyon#Procyon_A) become red giants? Is it dangerous for the Earth and life on it?

If for Sirius A we still have 500-800 million years, but Procyon A might become a red giant in 10 to 100 million years, by astronomical scale it is very soon.

Or nothing will happen with the Earth, because it is still too far?

**Tags:** star, stellar-evolution
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Note that 100 million years means the Sun will have moved about halfway around the center of the Milky Way in its orbit, and it's rather difficult to predict where Sirius or Procyon will be at that point, though they'll probably be a bit further away from the Sun than they are now.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-10-30. Score: 6

Nothing will happen. Neither star is massive enough to become a supernova and their velocities relative to the Earth mean that we will almost certainly be hundereds of light years away from them when they become red giants.

A 1 km/s velocity difference over 100 million years leads to a distance difference of about 300 light years.

Both Procyon and Sirius are in binary systems with white dwarfs, but they are not close binary systems. It is possible, but unlikely, that their white dwarf companions could accrete sufficient material to cause a Type Ia supernova - a possibility I address in [Will Sirius B start accreting from A and become a supernova type Ia?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/20122/will-sirius-b-start-accreting-from-a-and-become-a-supernova-type-ia) but even then, as I said above, these stars will be nowhere near the Sun when that happens.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-10-30. Score: 3

Life on Earth will not be adversely affected when nearby stars become red giants.

Certainly, things will get very messy inside those systems: red giants throw out a *lot* of gas and dust. Red giants are a lot more luminous than the Sun because they have such a huge surface area, but they don't emit large amounts of dangerous radiation, like X-rays or ultraviolet light. In fact, a red giant is cooler than the Sun, so it emits relatively little UV light.

According to [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_giant#Prospects_for_habitability), it's possible that a red giant system could even be habitable, so life in nearby systems should be quite safe.

> Although traditionally it has been suggested the evolution of a star into a red giant will render its planetary system, if present, uninhabitable, some research suggests that, during the evolution of a 1 M☉ star along the red-giant branch, it could harbor a habitable zone for several billion years at 2 AU out to around 100 million years at 9 AU out, giving perhaps enough time for life to develop on a suitable world. After the red-giant stage, there would for such a star be a habitable zone between 7 and 22 AU for an additional billion years.
> Later studies have refined this scenario, showing how for a 1 M☉ star the habitable zone lasts from $10^8$ years for a planet with an orbit similar to that of Mars to $2.1×10^8$ yr for one that orbits at Saturn's distance to the Sun, the maximum time ($3.7×10^8$ yr) corresponding for planets orbiting at the distance of Jupiter. However, for planets orbiting a 0.5 M☉ star in equivalent orbits to those of Jupiter and Saturn they would be in the habitable zone for $5.8×10^9$ yr and $2.1×10^9$ yr respectively; for stars more massive than the Sun, the times are considerably shorter.

---

However, the Sirius and Procyon systems mentioned in the question are both binary systems, and both Sirius B and Procyon B are already white dwarfs. That makes the picture more complicated, and definitely more dangerous inside those systems, but neighboring stellar systems won't be harmed.

When Sirius A and Procyon A become red giants their white dwarf companions will get bombarded by a lot of material. If a white dwarf accretes enough hydrogen, it can lead to a runaway fusion reaction, in other words, a [nova](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova) explosion.

> Hydrogen fusion may occur in a stable manner on the surface of the white dwarf for a narrow range of accretion rates, giving rise to a super soft X-ray source, but for most binary system parameters, the hydrogen burning is unstable thermally and rapidly converts a large amount of the hydrogen into other, heavier chemical elements in a runaway reaction, liberating an enormous amount of energy. This blows the remaining gases away from the surface of the white dwarf surface and produces an extremely bright outburst of light.

A nova is bright, but it only emits a tiny amount of energy compared to a supernova, and poses no danger to neighboring stellar systems.

Actually, it's very unlikely that either Sirius B or Procyon B will have nova events: they are simply too far from their companions to accrete enough hydrogen for that to occur. (Thanks to Peter Erwin for that info).

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The white dwarfs orbiting Sirius and Procyon are too far away from their primary stars for there to be a reasonable chance of accretion in the latters' red giant stages. Systems that *do* behave like that -- red giant + accreting white dwarf -- are called symbiotic stars (the nova outbursts are called symbiotic novae), and they require orbits with periods of < 15-20 years. The periods of Procyon A&B and Sirius A&B are 41 and 50 years, respectively, so no symbiotic novae are likely.  
> **username_3**: Thanks, @Peter. Edited.  
> **username_2**: @PeterErwin There is a chance that Procyon and SIrius B will accrete significant amounts of material in the AGB phase. Such mass accretion from the *slow* wind of an AGB star is well known and modelled. It results for instance in the class of stars known as barium dwarfs. I agree with PM2Ring though that such accretion is unlikely to result in a Type Ia supernova, but not necessarily because the mass isn't accreted.  
> **username_1**: @RobJeffries -- True, I was mainly commenting on the red giant phase. Still, given the relatively wide nature of both binaries, would the wind accretion be enough to result in nova outbursts? (Which is what PM 2Ring was discussing.)  
> **username_2**: @PeterErwin that depends on the wind speed. There are many stars known in wide binaries with white dwarfs, where the "normal star"  appears to have accreted a significant fraction of its mass from the WD progenitor. Symbiotic Novae are binaries featuring an AGB star.  
> **username_2**: @PeterErwin correction. D-type symbiotic binaries (the ones with long orbital periods) contain AGB stars.  

---

