<p>Yes, but.</p>

<p>Circumbinary configurations can be stable over long time periods, but in general they are a less stable configuration than "two moons orbiting one planet"</p>

<p>To increase the likelihood that the configuration will be stable, the two planets should be in a tight orbit (which can be unstable itself) and the moon should be distant and small. To get the moon to be distant enough the whole system should be distant from the sun.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T06:37:46.880Z
2017-09-30T06:37:46.880Z
James K
<p>The Pluto-Charon system is similar to this.   </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/QbXxv.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/QbXxv.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>It's unlikely that you'd have two planets of nearly the same mass because some variation is far more common, but a moon orbiting a binary planet system is certainly possible.   It's easier if it's not that close to the sun, for the same reason that it's difficult for Mercury and Venus to have moons.   A larger hill-sphere and less solar gravitation would make your system more stable in the long term.</p>

<p>And the Moon couldn't be in a Lagrange point in your system because, for starters, L1, 2 and 3 are never stable and the potentially stable Lagrange points, L4 and L5 require a large central planet and a significantly less massive object, (less than 1/26th the mass) orbiting the central planet.   The L4 and L5 points are to the orbiting object.  That doesn't work in a binary system of 2 objects of similar mass.</p>

<p>Any working Lagrange point scenario you'd have two moons and one planet, not binary planets and one moon.    You could, in theory have two moons at Lagrange points to each other orbiting a binary planet system but that would be adding even more improbabilities, but theoretically possible and stable for some time.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/XP2TT.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/XP2TT.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T16:28:32.697Z
Small nitpick: Is there maybe fig. 1, but with the position of the CMS of the Pluto-Charon system included?
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T17:14:25.797Z
@AtmosphericPrisonEscape at risk of showing my ignorance, what's CMS?
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T18:29:41.963Z
The Center of mass system, or barycenter. I guess there's one 's' too much when you say 'CMS system', but somehow people do that.
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T20:09:22.000Z
@AtmosphericPrisonEscape That was my guess, I just hadn't heard it called CMS.   This site seems to address it with a gif:  http://mathscinotes.com/2015/06/barycenter-of-pluto-and-charon/  Pluto's distance to barycenter + Charon's distance to barycenter = pluto's distance to Charon (by center of mass, not surface).    The barycenter orbital diameter ratio is also the same as their mass ratio, about 8.5 to 1.   So it's a bit less than 1 Pluto radius away from Pluto's surface.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-30T07:12:06.717Z
2017-09-30T07:12:06.717Z
userLTK
<p>Let's say you had a binary planet system of two earth-sized worlds with about the same mass. Could a stable moon orbit around the barycenter of both planets? If so, is there a limit to the mass of such a moon? Would it have to orbit in a Lagrangian point?</p>

<natural-satellites>
Could a moon orbit two planets at once?
Gliese
# Could a moon orbit two planets at once?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-09-30)

Let's say you had a binary planet system of two earth-sized worlds with about the same mass. Could a stable moon orbit around the barycenter of both planets? If so, is there a limit to the mass of such a moon? Would it have to orbit in a Lagrangian point?

**Tags:** natural-satellites

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-09-30. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

The Pluto-Charon system is similar to this.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/QbXxv.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/QbXxv.jpg)

It's unlikely that you'd have two planets of nearly the same mass because some variation is far more common, but a moon orbiting a binary planet system is certainly possible. It's easier if it's not that close to the sun, for the same reason that it's difficult for Mercury and Venus to have moons. A larger hill-sphere and less solar gravitation would make your system more stable in the long term.

And the Moon couldn't be in a Lagrange point in your system because, for starters, L1, 2 and 3 are never stable and the potentially stable Lagrange points, L4 and L5 require a large central planet and a significantly less massive object, (less than 1/26th the mass) orbiting the central planet. The L4 and L5 points are to the orbiting object. That doesn't work in a binary system of 2 objects of similar mass.

Any working Lagrange point scenario you'd have two moons and one planet, not binary planets and one moon. You could, in theory have two moons at Lagrange points to each other orbiting a binary planet system but that would be adding even more improbabilities, but theoretically possible and stable for some time.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/XP2TT.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/XP2TT.jpg)

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Small nitpick: Is there maybe fig. 1, but with the position of the CMS of the Pluto-Charon system included?  
> **username_2**: @AtmosphericPrisonEscape at risk of showing my ignorance, what's CMS?  
> **username_3**: The Center of mass system, or barycenter. I guess there's one 's' too much when you say 'CMS system', but somehow people do that.  
> **username_2**: @AtmosphericPrisonEscape That was my guess, I just hadn't heard it called CMS.   This site seems to address it with a gif:  http://mathscinotes.com/2015/06/barycenter-of-pluto-and-charon/  Pluto's distance to barycenter + Charon's distance to barycenter = pluto's distance to Charon (by center of mass, not surface).    The barycenter orbital diameter ratio is also the same as their mass ratio, about 8.5 to 1.   So it's a bit less than 1 Pluto radius away from Pluto's surface.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-09-30. Score: 5

Yes, but.

Circumbinary configurations can be stable over long time periods, but in general they are a less stable configuration than "two moons orbiting one planet"

To increase the likelihood that the configuration will be stable, the two planets should be in a tight orbit (which can be unstable itself) and the moon should be distant and small. To get the moon to be distant enough the whole system should be distant from the sun.


---

