<p>While the number of detected exoplanets is still low, is there a model that, considering the number and duration of made observations, and the fact that (non)detections depend on orbital plane alignment and timing, can answer questions like</p>
<ul>
<li><p>what is the typical number of exoplanets for a star?</p>
</li>
<li><p>what percentage of extrasolar systems can be expected to have at least one exoplanet?</p>
</li>
<li><p>how many (Jupiter, Earth)-like planets do we expect in each solar system?</p>
</li>
<li><p>which types of stars tend to have which types of planets?</p>
</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-01-20T18:47:28.423Z
Can you clarify what your looking for ? Is it more statistics on detected exoplanets to date, for which [NASA Exoplanet Archive](https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/) is the best bet or a model of exoplanet formation and numbers per star etc or a model for how many exoplanet detections there should be ?
astrosnapper
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-01-20T18:47:58.843Z
You seem to be looking for keywords like "completeness correction" and "detection bias correction". Try searching for those.
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-01-20T19:39:23.927Z
@astrosnapper Good question and link - I'm looking for a model of exoplanet formation and numbers per star that takes existing (non)detections and their probabilities into account
2080
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-01-20T19:40:22.190Z
@AtmosphericPrisonEscape These are excellent terms! A model that would employ these is what I'm looking for
2080
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-01-21T22:37:29.500Z
Model and statistics are different things. This question is at least on the border of too broad imho. You are asking for a review paper on explanation research and observations
planetmaker
<exoplanet><data-analysis><modeling>
Best resource for exoplanet statistics?
2080
# Best resource for exoplanet statistics?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-01-20)

While the number of detected exoplanets is still low, is there a model that, considering the number and duration of made observations, and the fact that (non)detections depend on orbital plane alignment and timing, can answer questions like

* what is the typical number of exoplanets for a star?
* what percentage of extrasolar systems can be expected to have at least one exoplanet?
* how many (Jupiter, Earth)-like planets do we expect in each solar system?
* which types of stars tend to have which types of planets?

**Tags:** exoplanet, data-analysis, modeling
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Can you clarify what your looking for ? Is it more statistics on detected exoplanets to date, for which [NASA Exoplanet Archive](https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/) is the best bet or a model of exoplanet formation and numbers per star etc or a model for how many exoplanet detections there should be ?  
> **username_2**: You seem to be looking for keywords like "completeness correction" and "detection bias correction". Try searching for those.  
> **username_0**: @astrosnapper Good question and link - I'm looking for a model of exoplanet formation and numbers per star that takes existing (non)detections and their probabilities into account  
> **username_0**: @AtmosphericPrisonEscape These are excellent terms! A model that would employ these is what I'm looking for  
> **username_3**: Model and statistics are different things. This question is at least on the border of too broad imho. You are asking for a review paper on explanation research and observations  

---

## 0 answers

