<p>You asked for arguments against this, but I don't think there are any other than money.  Consider the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/SPQ-11" rel="nofollow noreferrer">AN/SPQ-11</a> passive radar that was aboard the US Navy ship <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USNS_Observation_Island_(T-AGM-23)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Observation Island</a>.  The actual receiver area is not as large (7M according to <a href="https://fas.org/irp/program/collect/cobra_judy.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://fas.org/irp/program/collect/cobra_judy.htm</a>), but we could imagine a larger antenna being placed on a larger ship such as the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CVN-80)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">USS Enterprise</a>.  The beam (maximum width) of the Enterprise is 41 meters, which could certainly accommodate a 10-20m dish.</p>
<p>I think the only reason this would not be built would be lack of funds.  From an engineering perspective, it seems doable.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-15T00:26:02.747Z
2021-03-15T00:26:02.747Z
Craeft
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Observatory_for_Infrared_Astronomy" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SOFIA</a> stands for <em>Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy</em>. She <a href="https://www.sofia.usra.edu/multimedia/image-galleries/sofia-airborne-telescope-stabilization" rel="nofollow noreferrer">says</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>My telescope stays stable with a spherical bearing, shock absorbers, and gyroscopes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I suppose a similar system would work for an optical telescope on a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship" rel="nofollow noreferrer">maritime vessel</a> as well. But what about a radio-telescope on a ship with a dish of around 10m? What are arguments (ideally mathematical ones) against a similar construction like for SOFIA?</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/84who.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/84who.png" alt="SOFIA stabilization" /></a></p>
<h3>References</h3>
<ul>
<li>Tom Nardi <a href="https://hackaday.com/2019/10/22/a-miniature-radio-telescope-in-every-backyard/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">A Miniature Radio Telescope In Every Backyard</a>. <em>hackaday.com</em> (2019)</li>
<li>Gregory Redfern: <a href="https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030009571" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Cruise Ship Astronomy and Astrophotography</a> - The go-to astronomy resource for cruise travelers</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T00:34:18.883Z
I don't know of any shipborne radio telescopes for *astronomical* applications, but historically they have been quite common for spacecraft tracking, especially during launch and orbital insertion phases. Since the target's is moving fast an in a peculiar way, and since there is a single source at a single frequency, the tracking antennas "lock on" to the source and track its motion. This automatically corrects for any motion of the ocean-going vessel as it's indistinguishable from motion in the sky. Since this is not related to astronomy it would not be a suitable answer here.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T00:40:54.807Z
for bits and pieces of how tracking a moving radio source is done see [How exactly were the signals from quad dishes of Apollo Deep Space High-Gain Antenna or Russian B-529 processed for local control of tracking?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/40299/12102) and [From whence (what ground stations) do the world's major space agencies receive signals from their missions?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/32881/12102) and [Was the nutation problem of the Ulysses spacecraft successfully mitigated? If so, how?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/30849/12102)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T00:40:57.343Z
and [Why is the reflector on this millimeter-wave antenna spinning?](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/286006/102305) and [What were those motorized human-piloted platforms with helical antennas called (tracking launches)?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/23646/12102) keywords are "conical scanning" or "conscan".
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T00:54:26.137Z
@uhoh Loads of interesting links, I will do that rsn
B--rian
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T01:03:15.013Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yuanwang_1_in_Shanghai,_2019-10-17.jpg and [see also](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuan_Wang-class_tracking_ship#See_also)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T08:45:49.110Z
@uhoh On 2nd thought, I was thinking of radio dishes with diameter of $10..20 {\rm m}$, to be specific, I had images of the [Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mullard_Radio_Astronomy_Observatory) in mind.
B--rian
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T16:55:20.320Z
The aggressive sea air  will quickly destroy the telescope.
A. Rumlin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T20:13:53.540Z
@B--rian but on ships, and doing astronomical research specifically? If this was never done, it's hard to answer what the stabilization requirements would be, it would be application specific and with no existing application...
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T22:08:07.143Z
@uhoh I am somehow intrigued by the idea to have a (large) ship-based radio or radar telescope, because one could move it around the globe, see e.g. https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/40260/building-a-floating-ocean-going-giant-radio-telescope and I am still collecting pro and contra arguments. I find the fact that it has not done before attractive.
B--rian
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T22:41:42.043Z
@B--rian The Earth rotates already, so all ground-based instruments are in a sense "moving". I guess ships allow you to *configure an array* the way you like, similar to how the VLA and ALMA move their dishes around to optimize the configuration for a given measurement. I guess you must be talking about an array because if its a single dish experiment then there's no benefit I can see to putting one on a ship compared to putting it on land.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T22:44:13.047Z
@B--rian Arrays require stable or at least continuously measured 3D positions to wavelength-scale accuracy for each element; so direction stabilization is not the big problem, it's accurate continuous position measurement, or at least calibration. They can retrieve the 3D position information from arrays by simultaneous measurement of point-like calibration sources, but this assumes extremely steady rotational and orbital motion of the Earth, not a bunch of ships moving in ocean currents. One 10-20 meter dish on one ship seems almost pointless.
uhoh
<observational-astronomy><telescope><radio-telescope><sofia>
Maritime telescopes: Stabilisation requirements for optical vs. radio telescopes?
B--rian
# Maritime telescopes: Stabilisation requirements for optical vs. radio telescopes?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-02-09)

[SOFIA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Observatory_for_Infrared_Astronomy) stands for *Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy*. She [says](https://www.sofia.usra.edu/multimedia/image-galleries/sofia-airborne-telescope-stabilization):

> My telescope stays stable with a spherical bearing, shock absorbers, and gyroscopes.

I suppose a similar system would work for an optical telescope on a [maritime vessel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship) as well. But what about a radio-telescope on a ship with a dish of around 10m? What are arguments (ideally mathematical ones) against a similar construction like for SOFIA?

[![SOFIA stabilization](https://i.sstatic.net/84who.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/84who.png)

### References

* Tom Nardi [A Miniature Radio Telescope In Every Backyard](https://hackaday.com/2019/10/22/a-miniature-radio-telescope-in-every-backyard/). *hackaday.com* (2019)
* Gregory Redfern: [Cruise Ship Astronomy and Astrophotography](https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030009571) - The go-to astronomy resource for cruise travelers

**Tags:** observational-astronomy, telescope, radio-telescope, sofia
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I don't know of any shipborne radio telescopes for *astronomical* applications, but historically they have been quite common for spacecraft tracking, especially during launch and orbital insertion phases. Since the target's is moving fast an in a peculiar way, and since there is a single source at a single frequency, the tracking antennas "lock on" to the source and track its motion. This automatically corrects for any motion of the ocean-going vessel as it's indistinguishable from motion in the sky. Since this is not related to astronomy it would not be a suitable answer here.  
> **username_1**: for bits and pieces of how tracking a moving radio source is done see [How exactly were the signals from quad dishes of Apollo Deep Space High-Gain Antenna or Russian B-529 processed for local control of tracking?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/40299/12102) and [From whence (what ground stations) do the world's major space agencies receive signals from their missions?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/32881/12102) and [Was the nutation problem of the Ulysses spacecraft successfully mitigated? If so, how?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/30849/12102)  
> **username_1**: and [Why is the reflector on this millimeter-wave antenna spinning?](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/286006/102305) and [What were those motorized human-piloted platforms with helical antennas called (tracking launches)?](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/23646/12102) keywords are "conical scanning" or "conscan".  
> **username_0**: @uhoh Loads of interesting links, I will do that rsn  
> **username_1**: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yuanwang_1_in_Shanghai,_2019-10-17.jpg and [see also](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuan_Wang-class_tracking_ship#See_also)  
> **username_0**: @uhoh On 2nd thought, I was thinking of radio dishes with diameter of $10..20 {\rm m}$, to be specific, I had images of the [Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mullard_Radio_Astronomy_Observatory) in mind.  
> **username_2**: The aggressive sea air  will quickly destroy the telescope.  
> **username_1**: @B--rian but on ships, and doing astronomical research specifically? If this was never done, it's hard to answer what the stabilization requirements would be, it would be application specific and with no existing application...  
> **username_0**: @uhoh I am somehow intrigued by the idea to have a (large) ship-based radio or radar telescope, because one could move it around the globe, see e.g. https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/40260/building-a-floating-ocean-going-giant-radio-telescope and I am still collecting pro and contra arguments. I find the fact that it has not done before attractive.  
> **username_1**: @B--rian The Earth rotates already, so all ground-based instruments are in a sense "moving". I guess ships allow you to *configure an array* the way you like, similar to how the VLA and ALMA move their dishes around to optimize the configuration for a given measurement. I guess you must be talking about an array because if its a single dish experiment then there's no benefit I can see to putting one on a ship compared to putting it on land.  
> **username_1**: @B--rian Arrays require stable or at least continuously measured 3D positions to wavelength-scale accuracy for each element; so direction stabilization is not the big problem, it's accurate continuous position measurement, or at least calibration. They can retrieve the 3D position information from arrays by simultaneous measurement of point-like calibration sources, but this assumes extremely steady rotational and orbital motion of the Earth, not a bunch of ships moving in ocean currents. One 10-20 meter dish on one ship seems almost pointless.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2021-03-15. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

You asked for arguments against this, but I don't think there are any other than money. Consider the [AN/SPQ-11](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/SPQ-11) passive radar that was aboard the US Navy ship [Observation Island](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USNS_Observation_Island_(T-AGM-23)). The actual receiver area is not as large (7M according to <https://fas.org/irp/program/collect/cobra_judy.htm>), but we could imagine a larger antenna being placed on a larger ship such as the [USS Enterprise](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CVN-80)). The beam (maximum width) of the Enterprise is 41 meters, which could certainly accommodate a 10-20m dish.

I think the only reason this would not be built would be lack of funds. From an engineering perspective, it seems doable.


---

