<p>There is no formula for the <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ASPC...50..357P/abstract" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Pryor &amp; Meylan (1993)</a> mean. Equations 2 and 3 in the reference paper have to be solved through some sort of iterative scheme.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-07-22T15:23:00.933Z
2024-07-22T15:23:00.933Z
ProfRob
<p>The title says it all, I read a paper which cites this mean, I looked in the provided reference but didn't saw any mathematica formula for the mean. Is anyone aware of it</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-07-23T00:15:14.170Z
"The title says it all" No it doesn't.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-07-27T10:28:00.457Z
Please provide a reference to the paper
GrapefruitIsAwesome
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-08-02T16:15:08.127Z
I am sorry, I thought that marking ProfRob answer has accepted would close this, but I think it didn't, so I appearing here just to explicitly say that his answer solved my problem.
Felipe
<observational-astronomy>
Pryor & Meylan mean
Felipe
# Pryor & Meylan mean

(Asked by: username_0 on 2024-07-22)

The title says it all, I read a paper which cites this mean, I looked in the provided reference but didn't saw any mathematica formula for the mean. Is anyone aware of it

**Tags:** observational-astronomy
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: "The title says it all" No it doesn't.  
> **username_2**: Please provide a reference to the paper  
> **username_0**: I am sorry, I thought that marking ProfRob answer has accepted would close this, but I think it didn't, so I appearing here just to explicitly say that his answer solved my problem.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2024-07-22. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

There is no formula for the [Pryor & Meylan (1993)](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ASPC...50..357P/abstract) mean. Equations 2 and 3 in the reference paper have to be solved through some sort of iterative scheme.


---

