<p>Phys.org's <a href="https://phys.org/news/2021-07-magnetic-balding-black-holes-relativity.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Magnetic 'balding' of black holes saves general relativity prediction</a> says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There is a potentially hairy threat to the conjecture, though. Black holes can be born with a strong magnetic field or obtain one by munching on magnetized material. <strong>Such a field must quickly disappear for the no-hair conjecture to hold.</strong> But real black holes don't exist in isolation. They can be surrounded by plasma—gas so energized that electrons have detached from their atoms—that can sustain the magnetic field, potentially disproving the conjecture.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Using supercomputer simulations of a plasma-engulfed black hole, researchers from the Flatiron Institute's Center for Computational Astrophysics (CCA) in New York City, Columbia University and Princeton University found that the no-hair conjecture holds. The team reports its findings on July 27 in Physical Review Letters.</p>
<p>&quot;The no-hair conjecture is a cornerstone of general relativity,&quot; says study co-author Bart Ripperda, a research fellow at the CCA and a postdoctoral fellow at Princeton. <strong>&quot;If a black hole has a long-lived magnetic field, then the no-hair conjecture is violated. Luckily a solution came from plasma physics that saved the no-hair conjecture from being broken.&quot;</strong></p>
<p>It links to the recent Phys. Rev. Letter <strong><a href="https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.055101" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Magnetic Hair and Reconnection in Black Hole Magnetospheres</a></strong></p>
<p>I'm wondering why the <em>duration</em> of a black hole's magnetic field determine if the no hair conjecture is broken or not.</p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> Why would a black hole's magnetic hair being short-lived not violate the no-hair conjecture, but long-lived hair would violate the conjecture? How long is &quot;long-lived&quot;?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-06T19:01:27.233Z
@DaddyKropotkin thanks for the edit! Ideally the bit at the end should be an exact repeat of the title (that's usually how I do it) so if you'd like to edit further to make them match please feel free to do so!
uhoh
<black-hole><astrophysics><magnetic-field><no-hair-conjecture>
Why would a black hole's magnetic hair being short-lived not violate the no-hair conjecture, but long-lived hair would? How long is "long-lived"?
uhoh
# Why would a black hole's magnetic hair being short-lived not violate the no-hair conjecture, but long-lived hair would? How long is "long-lived"?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-08-06)

Phys.org's [Magnetic 'balding' of black holes saves general relativity prediction](https://phys.org/news/2021-07-magnetic-balding-black-holes-relativity.html) says:

> There is a potentially hairy threat to the conjecture, though. Black holes can be born with a strong magnetic field or obtain one by munching on magnetized material. **Such a field must quickly disappear for the no-hair conjecture to hold.** But real black holes don't exist in isolation. They can be surrounded by plasma—gas so energized that electrons have detached from their atoms—that can sustain the magnetic field, potentially disproving the conjecture.

Using supercomputer simulations of a plasma-engulfed black hole, researchers from the Flatiron Institute's Center for Computational Astrophysics (CCA) in New York City, Columbia University and Princeton University found that the no-hair conjecture holds. The team reports its findings on July 27 in Physical Review Letters.

"The no-hair conjecture is a cornerstone of general relativity," says study co-author Bart Ripperda, a research fellow at the CCA and a postdoctoral fellow at Princeton. **"If a black hole has a long-lived magnetic field, then the no-hair conjecture is violated. Luckily a solution came from plasma physics that saved the no-hair conjecture from being broken."**

It links to the recent Phys. Rev. Letter **[Magnetic Hair and Reconnection in Black Hole Magnetospheres](https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.055101)**

I'm wondering why the *duration* of a black hole's magnetic field determine if the no hair conjecture is broken or not.

**Question:** Why would a black hole's magnetic hair being short-lived not violate the no-hair conjecture, but long-lived hair would violate the conjecture? How long is "long-lived"?

**Tags:** black-hole, astrophysics, magnetic-field, no-hair-conjecture
> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: @DaddyKropotkin thanks for the edit! Ideally the bit at the end should be an exact repeat of the title (that's usually how I do it) so if you'd like to edit further to make them match please feel free to do so!  

---

## 0 answers

