<p>The reports that <em>Goblin</em> is a planet are incorrect. It is a dwarf planet, at best. Dwarf planet and planet are mutually exclusive terms. Planets are objects whose masses are so large that they have collided with, ejected, or captured the vast majority of the smaller stuff that share the same orbit as the planet.</p>

<p>Moreover, <em>Goblin</em> might well not even be a dwarf planet. The distinguishing characteristics of a dwarf planet is an object that is large enough to have pulled itself into a more or less spherical shape via self gravitation but is not anywhere near large enough to have the potential to clear the neighborhood of its orbit about the Sun.</p>

<p>The threshold that distinguishes dwarf planets from small solar system bodies is the <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.1091.pdf" rel="noreferrer">potato radius</a>. Objects somewhat smaller than the potato radius look like lumpy potatoes, while objects larger than that have sufficient mass to more or less pull themselves into hydrostatic equilibrium. The potato radius depends a bit on composition, and probably also depends on distance from the Sun. (Water ice is quite rocky at trans-Neptunian distances from the Sun.) The potato radius for rocky objects is about 300 km (diameter = 600 km), while for icy objects it's about 200 km (diameter = 400 km).</p>

<p>With an estimated diameter of 300 km, <em>Goblin</em> is probably too small to qualify as a dwarf planet, let alone as a planet.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-03T16:36:40.233Z
I really like that paper, but need some help reading it: [How did early estimates of a "potato radius" set 1 eV ~ GMμ/R and get 200 to 300 km?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/27875/7982)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-03T12:24:47.053Z
2018-10-03T12:24:47.053Z
David Hammen
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/02/dwarf-planet-the-goblin-discovery-planet-nine-oort-cloud" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The recently discovered Planet Goblin</a> is just 300 kms across. While I perfectly understand what it literally means, I'm having trouble wrapping this in my head. Does it mean I can imagine the planet as (approximately) a sphere for 300 kms diameter? That gives a radius of 150 kms, and thus a circumference of 942 kms. </p>

<p>A circumference of 942 kms means that the longest distance between any two points on the surface of the planet is just 471 kms -- That's just over 1.5 times the distance between <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=london%20to%20pairs&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-b-ab" rel="nofollow noreferrer">London to Paris</a> or 100 kms more than the distance between New <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=new%20york%20to%20washington%20dc&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-b-ab" rel="nofollow noreferrer">York and Washington DC</a> or about half the distance between <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=st%20petersburg%20to%20moscow&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-b-ab" rel="nofollow noreferrer">St. Petersburg and Moscow</a>. </p>

<p>Is the planet <em>that small</em>, really? Or am I missing something?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-02T15:35:15.800Z
It's referred to as a dwarf planet. At that size it might be spherical (if it's made of something relatively soft, like ice)  or it might be more irregular if it's made of something relatively hard like rock. I imagine all we know is how much light it reflects in total. So it could also be bigger but unexpectedly dark, or very shiny but smaller.
Steve Linton
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-02T19:27:46.327Z
Size is size.  That's it.   (Still rather larger than the home planet of Le Petit Prince.
Carl Witthoft
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-10-03T05:56:47.397Z
The diameter is based on the absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo (amount of light it reflects). The absolute magnitude of 5.3 is below (fainter) than the 4.0 normally assumed for dwarf planets. So it's "just" a Trans-Neptunian Object with a cool (and somewhat uncertain) orbit
astrosnapper
<dwarf-planets>
What does it mean for a planet to be just 300 kms across?
WorldGov
# What does it mean for a planet to be just 300 kms across?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-10-02)

[The recently discovered Planet Goblin](https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/02/dwarf-planet-the-goblin-discovery-planet-nine-oort-cloud) is just 300 kms across. While I perfectly understand what it literally means, I'm having trouble wrapping this in my head. Does it mean I can imagine the planet as (approximately) a sphere for 300 kms diameter? That gives a radius of 150 kms, and thus a circumference of 942 kms.

A circumference of 942 kms means that the longest distance between any two points on the surface of the planet is just 471 kms -- That's just over 1.5 times the distance between [London to Paris](https://www.google.com/search?q=london%20to%20pairs&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab) or 100 kms more than the distance between New [York and Washington DC](https://www.google.com/search?q=new%20york%20to%20washington%20dc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab) or about half the distance between [St. Petersburg and Moscow](https://www.google.com/search?q=st%20petersburg%20to%20moscow&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab).

Is the planet *that small*, really? Or am I missing something?

**Tags:** dwarf-planets
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: It's referred to as a dwarf planet. At that size it might be spherical (if it's made of something relatively soft, like ice)  or it might be more irregular if it's made of something relatively hard like rock. I imagine all we know is how much light it reflects in total. So it could also be bigger but unexpectedly dark, or very shiny but smaller.  
> **username_2**: Size is size.  That's it.   (Still rather larger than the home planet of Le Petit Prince.  
> **username_3**: The diameter is based on the absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo (amount of light it reflects). The absolute magnitude of 5.3 is below (fainter) than the 4.0 normally assumed for dwarf planets. So it's "just" a Trans-Neptunian Object with a cool (and somewhat uncertain) orbit  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-10-03. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

The reports that *Goblin* is a planet are incorrect. It is a dwarf planet, at best. Dwarf planet and planet are mutually exclusive terms. Planets are objects whose masses are so large that they have collided with, ejected, or captured the vast majority of the smaller stuff that share the same orbit as the planet.

Moreover, *Goblin* might well not even be a dwarf planet. The distinguishing characteristics of a dwarf planet is an object that is large enough to have pulled itself into a more or less spherical shape via self gravitation but is not anywhere near large enough to have the potential to clear the neighborhood of its orbit about the Sun.

The threshold that distinguishes dwarf planets from small solar system bodies is the [potato radius](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.1091.pdf). Objects somewhat smaller than the potato radius look like lumpy potatoes, while objects larger than that have sufficient mass to more or less pull themselves into hydrostatic equilibrium. The potato radius depends a bit on composition, and probably also depends on distance from the Sun. (Water ice is quite rocky at trans-Neptunian distances from the Sun.) The potato radius for rocky objects is about 300 km (diameter = 600 km), while for icy objects it's about 200 km (diameter = 400 km).

With an estimated diameter of 300 km, *Goblin* is probably too small to qualify as a dwarf planet, let alone as a planet.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: I really like that paper, but need some help reading it: [How did early estimates of a "potato radius" set 1 eV ~ GMμ/R and get 200 to 300 km?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/27875/7982)  

---

