<p>A pump can lift water about thirty feet. That's the height where the column of water in the pipe weighs the same as an equivalent column of air (and that's why deep wells use submersible pumps: they push the water up from below, instead of pulling from above and relying on atmospheric pressure to provide the lift). While fuel would be less dense than water, it's still much more dense than air, and the pressure of the atmosphere simply doesn't provide enough force to raise that column of fuel very far.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-21T16:44:41.253Z
2015-11-21T18:22:52.240Z
2015-11-21T18:22:52.240Z
Pete Becker
<p>The ISS travels over 7 kilometers per second, so the challenge of refueling would require bringing the pipe from Earth to the same speed as the ISS in order to make the connection. However, the pipe could be used to supply a stationary supply space station that has intermediate orbiters that connect the stationary supply station to the ISS.  That is the idea of the space elevator. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-21T16:13:34.653Z
2015-11-21T16:13:34.653Z
Justin Waters
<p>We all know that we need a lot of fuel to escape from earth. Even 90% fuel of an spaceship is wasted in escaping the earth which definitely affect our power to explore the universe. we have to do a lot of calculations and even a small failure can waste a lot of money. for ex- the Manglayan Indian mission to Mars due to under performance of the engine was almost lost. As it a cheapest mission to Mars. They have a very limited fuel. So why can't we connect our space station with a long pipe and Make our space ship refuel at that point. I know a lot of energy will be required to pump the fuel up. But I was thinking about a better option. why can't we use vacuum to transfer liquid. Like if we have a pipe and we suck one end and the water automatically travels. Is it possible or what are the technical difficulty here.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-21T16:12:08.237Z
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about spaceflight, and should be moved to Space Exploration Stack Exchange.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-21T18:12:20.360Z
Vacuum can only 'draw up' a column of water 32 feet (9.75 meter): http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=195084
Wayfaring Stranger
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-23T04:14:32.663Z
And a vacuum draws up 0 feet in space.    But that's not really the problem.   The problem is the space station needs to orbit the earth very fast and you can't connect anything to it.   A geostationary orbit - maybe.  Difficult, but maybe.    The space station where it is - no way.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-23T15:30:44.857Z
I'm closing this question as off-topic because it is about spaceflight, not astronomy. While Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a good site to ask such questions on, I would recommend reviewing the comments and performing a little more research before asking a question over there. Also, look into the topic of space elevators.
called2voyage
<space-probe><space-travel>
can we use connect a long pipe with space station and use vacuum for fuel transfer?
Ravi Singh
# can we use connect a long pipe with space station and use vacuum for fuel transfer?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-11-21)

We all know that we need a lot of fuel to escape from earth. Even 90% fuel of an spaceship is wasted in escaping the earth which definitely affect our power to explore the universe. we have to do a lot of calculations and even a small failure can waste a lot of money. for ex- the Manglayan Indian mission to Mars due to under performance of the engine was almost lost. As it a cheapest mission to Mars. They have a very limited fuel. So why can't we connect our space station with a long pipe and Make our space ship refuel at that point. I know a lot of energy will be required to pump the fuel up. But I was thinking about a better option. why can't we use vacuum to transfer liquid. Like if we have a pipe and we suck one end and the water automatically travels. Is it possible or what are the technical difficulty here.

**Tags:** space-probe, space-travel
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about spaceflight, and should be moved to Space Exploration Stack Exchange.  
> **username_2**: Vacuum can only 'draw up' a column of water 32 feet (9.75 meter): http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=195084  
> **username_3**: And a vacuum draws up 0 feet in space.    But that's not really the problem.   The problem is the space station needs to orbit the earth very fast and you can't connect anything to it.   A geostationary orbit - maybe.  Difficult, but maybe.    The space station where it is - no way.  
> **username_4**: I'm closing this question as off-topic because it is about spaceflight, not astronomy. While Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a good site to ask such questions on, I would recommend reviewing the comments and performing a little more research before asking a question over there. Also, look into the topic of space elevators.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-11-21. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

A pump can lift water about thirty feet. That's the height where the column of water in the pipe weighs the same as an equivalent column of air (and that's why deep wells use submersible pumps: they push the water up from below, instead of pulling from above and relying on atmospheric pressure to provide the lift). While fuel would be less dense than water, it's still much more dense than air, and the pressure of the atmosphere simply doesn't provide enough force to raise that column of fuel very far.


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2015-11-21. Score: 0

The ISS travels over 7 kilometers per second, so the challenge of refueling would require bringing the pipe from Earth to the same speed as the ISS in order to make the connection. However, the pipe could be used to supply a stationary supply space station that has intermediate orbiters that connect the stationary supply station to the ISS. That is the idea of the space elevator.


---

