<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Telescope" rel="noreferrer">The James Webb Telescope is the next one on the launchpad</a> that you might be familiar with.</p>

<p>Although there are a few differences that one ought to be aware of.  NASA has an entire program of telescopes to observe the universe, and many of them are designed for different wavelengths of light.  The James Webb is primarily designed for the infrared part of the spectrum.  While many people view the Webb as the successor to the Hubble, it would be more fair to say that it's really a successor to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitzer_Space_Telescope" rel="noreferrer">Spitzer Telescope</a>.  Hubble and Spitzer were both part of the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Observatories_program" rel="noreferrer">Great Observatories</a>" program.  The Webb telescope is barely hanging on to funding, but so far the US hasn't managed to entirely abandon the program, science, or reality. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-11-07T02:41:24.563Z
2013-11-07T02:48:28.220Z
2013-11-07T02:48:28.220Z
Larian LeQuella
<p>We've had hubble for two decades. Its become the most famous space telescope, and lately <a href="http://kepler.nasa.gov">Kepler</a> seems to be running for the second place. Are there any more powerful, better telescopes planned for launch in the near future? </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-11-06T20:23:08.157Z
Definitely yes. Take a look at Gaia and JWST. However, space missions vary greatly in purpose, and hence in instruments etc. There is a bunch of important missions happening/coming in the following few areas: gamma-ray astronomy(GRBs, cosmic rays, SNe), microwave astronomy (CMB, large scale structure), IR(molecular clouds, protoplanetary discs), astrometry(stellar kinematics), photometry (exoplanets, asteroseismology), possibly gravitational waves and others, to name a few. However, I would indeed be happy to see a small summarizing review here or a reference to such a review.
Alexey Bobrick
<telescope><space><space-telescope>
What are the next planned space telescopes?
bogen
# What are the next planned space telescopes?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-11-06)

We've had hubble for two decades. Its become the most famous space telescope, and lately [Kepler](http://kepler.nasa.gov) seems to be running for the second place. Are there any more powerful, better telescopes planned for launch in the near future?

**Tags:** telescope, space, space-telescope
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Definitely yes. Take a look at Gaia and JWST. However, space missions vary greatly in purpose, and hence in instruments etc. There is a bunch of important missions happening/coming in the following few areas: gamma-ray astronomy(GRBs, cosmic rays, SNe), microwave astronomy (CMB, large scale structure), IR(molecular clouds, protoplanetary discs), astrometry(stellar kinematics), photometry (exoplanets, asteroseismology), possibly gravitational waves and others, to name a few. However, I would indeed be happy to see a small summarizing review here or a reference to such a review.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-11-07. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

[The James Webb Telescope is the next one on the launchpad](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Telescope) that you might be familiar with.

Although there are a few differences that one ought to be aware of. NASA has an entire program of telescopes to observe the universe, and many of them are designed for different wavelengths of light. The James Webb is primarily designed for the infrared part of the spectrum. While many people view the Webb as the successor to the Hubble, it would be more fair to say that it's really a successor to the [Spitzer Telescope](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitzer_Space_Telescope). Hubble and Spitzer were both part of the "[Great Observatories](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Observatories_program)" program. The Webb telescope is barely hanging on to funding, but so far the US hasn't managed to entirely abandon the program, science, or reality.


---

