<p>To expand a bit on FJC's answer: galactic disks are not rigid bodies, and so we should not expect them to rigidly precess.</p>

<p>Most disk galaxies <em>do</em> show warps at large radii (including our own), in both the interstellar gas and the stars. From observations of warps in gas disks, we know that the azimuthal angle of the warp often changes with radius: i.e., the tilt of the disk changes as a function of radius.[*] Since the <em>angular</em> rotation speed changes as a function of radius,[**] this suggests the tilt could precess at different rates for different radii.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, since there isn't really a consensus on what causes or maintains warps, it's very hard to go from observing a warp to predicting what the underlying precession rates might or might not be. (Although one can argue that the precession rate can't vary <em>too</em> much with radius, otherwise the warp would rapidly "wind up" and lose its coherent warped shape, and we wouldn't see warps as often as we do.)</p>

<p>See <a href="https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March11/Sellwood/Sellwood8.html" rel="noreferrer">here</a> for some discussion of the theoretical issues.</p>

<p>[*] This is a <em>kind</em> of precession, although it's a change in the orientation of the rotational axis with radius rather than a change with time (as in the Earth's precession).</p>

<p>[**] Even if the circular <em>velocity</em> is approximately constant, as it often is in the outer regions of galaxies, the increase in the circumference as a function of increasing radius means the angular velocity goes down.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-10T14:27:27.720Z
2018-11-10T14:27:27.720Z
Peter Erwin
<p>The whole galactic disk is made up of many individual stars and the interstellar gas between them. The whole thing doesn't tilt or wobble as a solid object would.</p>
<p>Other parts of the Galaxy do precess though. The central supermassive black hole might and therefore the jets coming out of it might move around like the axis of the Earth's rotation does.</p>
<p>Also, galactic disks do wobble but not like a solid disk, more like a series of rings - the orbits are different at different distances from the centre. These can change very slowly and parts of the disk can be as a different angle than other parts.</p>
<p>This is generally not well understood because we can't see the disks very well, being so far away, and they would change very slowly.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T17:09:54.983Z
It's true that we usually start with rigid bodies when we learn about precession, but that doesn't *a priori* mean that anything that's not perfectly rigid can not precess. The galaxy is a gravitationally bound system and there is collective motion due to gravitational coupling among its bits. I think that dynamical systems can indeed precess under the influence of an external torque, even if it's not exactly the same as how a spinning top would behave. I can't prove it, but I don't think that just saying "many individual stars and the interstellar gas" is enough to rule it out.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-09T10:28:59.313Z
Yes, I wasn't trying to say that a galaxy couldn't precess, just that it's more complicated because it isn't a single object, so it wouldn't precess in the same way as a solid disk.
FJC
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-09T15:37:59.577Z
If I understand *"galactic disks do wobble but not like a solid disk, more like a series of rings"* correctly, then that means that e.g. the orbit of each star within that galaxy makes up one such ring? Then that would be a very complex movement because the rings' motions affect each other.
Everyday Astronaut
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-12T12:08:10.873Z
Yes it is a very complex problem, and even thinking of each star's orbit as a single ring is a simplification. The full answer is we don't really know because in order to understand it we would need to do a computer simulation of a whole galaxy with every star and molecule of gas represented perfectly, and all their gravitational, chemical, mangnetic, etc. interactions also represented perfectly, and then do lots of these to see how the size or shape or environment of the galaxy or stars or interstellar gas affects it. Which is way beyond our current computing limits.
FJC
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T14:05:08.177Z
2023-12-18T15:49:33.037Z
2023-12-18T15:49:33.037Z
FJC
<p>Precession is a general property of rotating systems under forces from external sources. For instance, Earth's precession is due to gravitational force from the Sun and the Moon. Since the galaxy is very far away from any other gravitational source, I don't see a reason for its precession.</p>
<p><strong>Edit:</strong> As pointed out in the comment below (@RobJeffries), if it is not sufficiently far from massive system, then it will possibly precess...</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T14:18:02.417Z
In that case, @RobJeffries, it may precess... :)
Brasil
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T14:03:42.563Z
But this isn't true. Our Galaxy is only $\sim 20$ diameters away from its nearest massive neighbour.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T11:49:56.223Z
2023-12-18T23:10:01.647Z
2023-12-18T23:10:01.647Z
Brasil
<p>Does the axis of a galaxy as a whole "wobble" the same way that the Earth does?  If so do we have any idea how much or how fast the Milky Way is doing so?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-08T20:51:30.390Z
This question sounds like it has probably been investigated before. Does anyone have any relevant paper/literature at hand?
Everyday Astronaut
<galaxy><rotation><precession>
Does the rotation of galaxies precess?
smithkm
# Does the rotation of galaxies precess?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-08)

Does the axis of a galaxy as a whole "wobble" the same way that the Earth does? If so do we have any idea how much or how fast the Milky Way is doing so?

**Tags:** galaxy, rotation, precession
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: This question sounds like it has probably been investigated before. Does anyone have any relevant paper/literature at hand?  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-11-10. Score: 7

To expand a bit on FJC's answer: galactic disks are not rigid bodies, and so we should not expect them to rigidly precess.

Most disk galaxies *do* show warps at large radii (including our own), in both the interstellar gas and the stars. From observations of warps in gas disks, we know that the azimuthal angle of the warp often changes with radius: i.e., the tilt of the disk changes as a function of radius.[\*] Since the *angular* rotation speed changes as a function of radius,[\*\*] this suggests the tilt could precess at different rates for different radii.

Unfortunately, since there isn't really a consensus on what causes or maintains warps, it's very hard to go from observing a warp to predicting what the underlying precession rates might or might not be. (Although one can argue that the precession rate can't vary *too* much with radius, otherwise the warp would rapidly "wind up" and lose its coherent warped shape, and we wouldn't see warps as often as we do.)

See [here](https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March11/Sellwood/Sellwood8.html) for some discussion of the theoretical issues.

[\*] This is a *kind* of precession, although it's a change in the orientation of the rotational axis with radius rather than a change with time (as in the Earth's precession).

[\*\*] Even if the circular *velocity* is approximately constant, as it often is in the outer regions of galaxies, the increase in the circumference as a function of increasing radius means the angular velocity goes down.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-11-08. Score: 7

The whole galactic disk is made up of many individual stars and the interstellar gas between them. The whole thing doesn't tilt or wobble as a solid object would.

Other parts of the Galaxy do precess though. The central supermassive black hole might and therefore the jets coming out of it might move around like the axis of the Earth's rotation does.

Also, galactic disks do wobble but not like a solid disk, more like a series of rings - the orbits are different at different distances from the centre. These can change very slowly and parts of the disk can be as a different angle than other parts.

This is generally not well understood because we can't see the disks very well, being so far away, and they would change very slowly.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: It's true that we usually start with rigid bodies when we learn about precession, but that doesn't *a priori* mean that anything that's not perfectly rigid can not precess. The galaxy is a gravitationally bound system and there is collective motion due to gravitational coupling among its bits. I think that dynamical systems can indeed precess under the influence of an external torque, even if it's not exactly the same as how a spinning top would behave. I can't prove it, but I don't think that just saying "many individual stars and the interstellar gas" is enough to rule it out.  
> **username_3**: Yes, I wasn't trying to say that a galaxy couldn't precess, just that it's more complicated because it isn't a single object, so it wouldn't precess in the same way as a solid disk.  
> **username_1**: If I understand *"galactic disks do wobble but not like a solid disk, more like a series of rings"* correctly, then that means that e.g. the orbit of each star within that galaxy makes up one such ring? Then that would be a very complex movement because the rings' motions affect each other.  
> **username_3**: Yes it is a very complex problem, and even thinking of each star's orbit as a single ring is a simplification. The full answer is we don't really know because in order to understand it we would need to do a computer simulation of a whole galaxy with every star and molecule of gas represented perfectly, and all their gravitational, chemical, mangnetic, etc. interactions also represented perfectly, and then do lots of these to see how the size or shape or environment of the galaxy or stars or interstellar gas affects it. Which is way beyond our current computing limits.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-11-08. Score: 2

Precession is a general property of rotating systems under forces from external sources. For instance, Earth's precession is due to gravitational force from the Sun and the Moon. Since the galaxy is very far away from any other gravitational source, I don't see a reason for its precession.

**Edit:** As pointed out in the comment below (@RobJeffries), if it is not sufficiently far from massive system, then it will possibly precess...

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: But this isn't true. Our Galaxy is only $\sim 20$ diameters away from its nearest massive neighbour.  
> **username_5**: In that case, @RobJeffries, it may precess... :)  

---

