<p>It is negligible.  </p>

<p>The amount of energy per square metre per second is called the "flux". The flux of the brightest star in the sky, Sirius, is <a href="http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~hill/ast103/a103_notes_oct23.pdf" rel="nofollow">one ten billionth of the sun</a>. That mean the energy the earth receives from the sun in <em>one second</em> is the same as the energy that it gets from Sirius in about 300 years. And Sirius (at magnitude -1.47) is by far the brightest star. All the others add next to nothing.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-10T23:05:54.273Z
The surface brightness of Sirius is brighter than the Sun. Space is big and contains lots of stars like Sirius. A full answer requires a discussion of Olber's paradox.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-10T21:32:05.207Z
2015-11-10T21:32:05.207Z
James K
<p>Posted as an answer mainly so it won't vanish as a comment. 
Anyone is welcome to take this and refine it in their own answer.</p>

<p>One lux = one lumen per square meter.<br>
Bright moonlight is about 0.5 lux.<br>
Full noon sunlight about 100,000 lux.<br>
Stumble about in the dark and see dim shapes is 0.1 lux or less. </p>

<p>Brightest of starlights is going to be well under bright moonlight - maybe 0.01 - 0.1 lux range. At a very very very rough calculation that puts sunlight at about 10E6 to 10E7 above starlight. Adjust for asymmetries across the earth's lit disk and much else and that is liable to still give a result somewhere over a million to one.</p>

<p>Starry night:</p>

<p>30 seconds f/3.5 ISO 3200. Brightness value -6.3 (dark!)</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/35eyv.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/35eyv.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-22T05:32:34.003Z
2020-04-22T12:31:53.077Z
2020-04-22T12:31:53.077Z
Russell McMahon
<p>Earth gets its radiation input primarily from Sun, then from reflected sunlight from Moon, and stars. Among these, what is the share of stars (or sources outside solar system) to this total radiation input of Earth. Is it negligible compared to solar radiation? (I am referring to top-of-atmosphere situation.)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-11-11T03:18:40.640Z
I read somewhere (sorry couldn't find it), but most of the energy we get from the Moon isn't the visible light but thermal energy/infra-red light form the hot surface of the moon.    That doesn't really address your question though.    I think the quick answer to your question is straight forward, yes it's negligible, even at the top of the atmosphere (the atmosphere filters out distant star-light and light from the sun about equally).  Even if you remove all the dust that blocks star-light it's still (I think) negligible.  But I'm not sure how to approach a detailed calculation.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-22T05:18:23.590Z
One thought that may catalyse an answer from others. Bright moonlight is about 0.5 lux. Full noon sunlight about 100,000 lux. Brightest of starlights is going to be well under broight moonlight - maybe 0.01 - 0.1 lux range. At a very very very rough calculation that puts sunlight at about 10E6 to 10E7 above starlight. Adjust for assymetries across lit disk and much else and that is liable to still give a result somewhere over a million to one.
Russell McMahon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-25T04:25:19.160Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight#Intensity_in_different_conditions
Keith McClary
<apparent-magnitude>
What is the share of stars in total radiation input of Earth?
dsvthampi
# What is the share of stars in total radiation input of Earth?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-11-10)

Earth gets its radiation input primarily from Sun, then from reflected sunlight from Moon, and stars. Among these, what is the share of stars (or sources outside solar system) to this total radiation input of Earth. Is it negligible compared to solar radiation? (I am referring to top-of-atmosphere situation.)

**Tags:** apparent-magnitude
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I read somewhere (sorry couldn't find it), but most of the energy we get from the Moon isn't the visible light but thermal energy/infra-red light form the hot surface of the moon.    That doesn't really address your question though.    I think the quick answer to your question is straight forward, yes it's negligible, even at the top of the atmosphere (the atmosphere filters out distant star-light and light from the sun about equally).  Even if you remove all the dust that blocks star-light it's still (I think) negligible.  But I'm not sure how to approach a detailed calculation.  
> **username_2**: One thought that may catalyse an answer from others. Bright moonlight is about 0.5 lux. Full noon sunlight about 100,000 lux. Brightest of starlights is going to be well under broight moonlight - maybe 0.01 - 0.1 lux range. At a very very very rough calculation that puts sunlight at about 10E6 to 10E7 above starlight. Adjust for assymetries across lit disk and much else and that is liable to still give a result somewhere over a million to one.  
> **username_3**: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight#Intensity_in_different_conditions  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-11-10. Score: 1

It is negligible.

The amount of energy per square metre per second is called the "flux". The flux of the brightest star in the sky, Sirius, is [one ten billionth of the sun](http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~hill/ast103/a103_notes_oct23.pdf). That mean the energy the earth receives from the sun in *one second* is the same as the energy that it gets from Sirius in about 300 years. And Sirius (at magnitude -1.47) is by far the brightest star. All the others add next to nothing.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: The surface brightness of Sirius is brighter than the Sun. Space is big and contains lots of stars like Sirius. A full answer requires a discussion of Olber's paradox.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-04-22. Score: 0

Posted as an answer mainly so it won't vanish as a comment.
Anyone is welcome to take this and refine it in their own answer.

One lux = one lumen per square meter.  
Bright moonlight is about 0.5 lux.  
Full noon sunlight about 100,000 lux.  
Stumble about in the dark and see dim shapes is 0.1 lux or less.

Brightest of starlights is going to be well under bright moonlight - maybe 0.01 - 0.1 lux range. At a very very very rough calculation that puts sunlight at about 10E6 to 10E7 above starlight. Adjust for asymmetries across the earth's lit disk and much else and that is liable to still give a result somewhere over a million to one.

Starry night:

30 seconds f/3.5 ISO 3200. Brightness value -6.3 (dark!)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/35eyv.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/35eyv.png)


---

