<h3>tl;dr</h3>
<p>No, not from Earth.</p>
<p>Because of the ionosphere.</p>
<p>Whistlers are VLF (very low frequency) hundreds to thousands of Hertz. Our ionosphere blocks electromagnetic radiation very reliably below say roughly 10 MHz depending on time of day and solar activity because it's a plasma.</p>
<p>The image below shows peak whistler emissions at about 1 kHz.</p>
<p>You can imagine that the electrons in the ionosphere look more like electrons in a lossy metal to a radio wave in the kHz range; some will bounce off like it's a shiny metal marble, others will be absorbed, but without question <strong><a href="https://youtu.be/zKhEw7nD9C4?t=35" rel="noreferrer">None shall pass!</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-Frequency_Array_(LOFAR)" rel="noreferrer">LOFAR</a> works from 10 MHz to 250 MHz.</p>
<p>See also</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/36862">Why did it take five years to &quot;figure out&quot; how to use astrometric calibration sources to deblur LOFAR images?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/34412">What can be learned from low frequency radio astronomy available outside of Earth&#39;s ionosphere?</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Update!</h3>
<p>No, not even from cis-lunar space!</p>
<p>Because the interplanetary electron density is still too high.</p>
<p>@ProfRob's <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/34412/what-can-be-learned-from-low-frequency-radio-astronomy-available-outside-of-eart#comment65891_34412">comment</a> on the &quot;What can be learned...&quot; question reminds us:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>How low is &quot;low&quot;? The plasma frequency in the interplanetary medium near the Earth is about 100 kHz. <a href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/519164">https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/519164</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>and that answer goes into substantial detail on how to calculate the plasma frequency of various media.</p>
<p>The Chinese lunar orbiter <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chang%27e_4#Relay_satellite" rel="noreferrer">Queqiao</a> had a low frequency receiver, and backing up ProfRob's point:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Additionally, this satellite hosts the Netherlands–China Low-Frequency Explorer (NCLE), an instrument performing astrophysical studies in the unexplored radio regime of <strong>80 kilohertz to 80 megahertz.</strong> It was developed by the Radboud University in Netherlands and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The NCLE on the orbiter and the LFS on the lander work in synergy performing low-frequency <strong>(0.1–80 MHz)</strong> radio astronomical observations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are further references in the article.</p>
<p>It seems you must build a spacecraft and fly it into close proximity to Jupiter -- within a few attenuation lengths -- to hear the whistlers.</p>
<h3>More</h3>
<p>Your reference <a href="https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/" rel="noreferrer">Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons</a> links to the Open Access Nature paper Y. Y. Shprits et al. (2018) <a href="https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/" rel="noreferrer">Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons</a> which includes Figure 2. shown below.</p>
<p>From <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio)" rel="noreferrer">Whistlers (radio)</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A whistler is a very low frequency or VLF electromagnetic (radio) wave generated by lightning.[1] Frequencies of terrestrial whistlers are 1 kHz to 30 kHz, with a maximum amplitude usually at 3 kHz to 5 kHz. Although they are electromagnetic waves, they occur at audio frequencies, and can be converted to audio using a suitable receiver. They are produced by lightning strikes (mostly intracloud and return-path) where the impulse travels along the Earth's magnetic field lines from one hemisphere to the other. They undergo dispersion of several kHz due to the slower velocity of the lower frequencies through the plasma environments of the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Thus they are perceived as a descending tone which can last for a few seconds. The study of whistlers categorizes them into Pure Note, Diffuse, 2-Hop, and Echo Train types.</p>
<p>Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft detected whistler-like activity in the vicinity of Jupiter known as &quot;Jovian Whistlers&quot;, supporting the visual observations of lightning made by Voyager 1</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<p>Figure 2 from the Nature paper linked above.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Comparison of wave power and pitch angle distributions for the encounter on 6 September 1996 (orbital segment G2). a The distance between Ganymede and the Galileo spacecraft, b measurements of the magnetic field, c pitch angle distribution of 527–884 keV electron fluxes, d same as c but normalized by the value of fluxes at 60° local pitch angle, e dynamic spectrogram of electric field very low frequency (VLF) spectral density, f dynamic spectrogram of magnetic field VLF spectral density</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/vtH0K.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/vtH0K.png" alt="Figure 2. Comparison of wave power and pitch angle distributions for the encounter on 6 September 1996 (orbital segment G2)" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T23:08:05.097Z
2021-04-26T23:17:18.367Z
2021-04-26T23:17:18.367Z
uhoh
<p><a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/27977/37191">Can I sense a bright star pointing an eight foot antenna towards it?</a> is a while ago, but the discussion about this question I found very interesting. Please forgive me that I am not an expert in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio)" rel="noreferrer">Jovian Whistlers</a> but I tend to understand it as massive EM events on Jupiter.</p>
<p>I am wondering: <strong>Could we use a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yagi%E2%80%93Uda_antenna" rel="noreferrer">Yagi-Uda antenna</a> or an array of it to resolve the source of the radio signals on Jupiter?</strong> For instance, we could have the Jupiter-disk covered by a square of <span class="math-container">$40 \times 40$</span> pixels, and the goal would be to figure out from which pixel the signal originated.</p>
<p>The idea behind that is that a cool research question for an (advanced) science project in school would be a question like &quot;Did the lightning occur inside the Red Spot?&quot; and Yagi-Uda antennas are fun to build, and do not require as much space as other antenna types.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/" rel="noreferrer">Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons</a></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T04:11:38.483Z
you may be able to use [your answer here](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/43428) together with the ProfRob answer I've linked to below calculate the complex dielectric constant $n + \text{i}k$ then use $I(x) = \left(\exp(-kr)/r\right)^2$ to see how the intensity varies with distance from Jupiter and to see when it is dominated by $1/r^2$ and when by exponential absorption. Feel free to post such an answer and accept it! (but don't blindly trust my math!)
uhoh
<amateur-observing><radio-astronomy><jupiter>
Requirements to resolve position of Jovian Whistlers up to magnitude of Red Spot with amateur radio equipment?
B--rian
# Requirements to resolve position of Jovian Whistlers up to magnitude of Red Spot with amateur radio equipment?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-04-26)

[Can I sense a bright star pointing an eight foot antenna towards it?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/27977/37191) is a while ago, but the discussion about this question I found very interesting. Please forgive me that I am not an expert in [Jovian Whistlers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio)) but I tend to understand it as massive EM events on Jupiter.

I am wondering: **Could we use a [Yagi-Uda antenna](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yagi%E2%80%93Uda_antenna) or an array of it to resolve the source of the radio signals on Jupiter?** For instance, we could have the Jupiter-disk covered by a square of $40 \times 40$ pixels, and the goal would be to figure out from which pixel the signal originated.

The idea behind that is that a cool research question for an (advanced) science project in school would be a question like "Did the lightning occur inside the Red Spot?" and Yagi-Uda antennas are fun to build, and do not require as much space as other antenna types.

### References

* [Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons](https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/)

**Tags:** amateur-observing, radio-astronomy, jupiter
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: you may be able to use [your answer here](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/43428) together with the ProfRob answer I've linked to below calculate the complex dielectric constant $n + \text{i}k$ then use $I(x) = \left(\exp(-kr)/r\right)^2$ to see how the intensity varies with distance from Jupiter and to see when it is dominated by $1/r^2$ and when by exponential absorption. Feel free to post such an answer and accept it! (but don't blindly trust my math!)  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-04-26. Score: 8 | Accepted answer

### tl;dr

No, not from Earth.

Because of the ionosphere.

Whistlers are VLF (very low frequency) hundreds to thousands of Hertz. Our ionosphere blocks electromagnetic radiation very reliably below say roughly 10 MHz depending on time of day and solar activity because it's a plasma.

The image below shows peak whistler emissions at about 1 kHz.

You can imagine that the electrons in the ionosphere look more like electrons in a lossy metal to a radio wave in the kHz range; some will bounce off like it's a shiny metal marble, others will be absorbed, but without question **[None shall pass!](https://youtu.be/zKhEw7nD9C4?t=35)**

[LOFAR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-Frequency_Array_(LOFAR)) works from 10 MHz to 250 MHz.

See also

* [Why did it take five years to "figure out" how to use astrometric calibration sources to deblur LOFAR images?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/36862)
* [What can be learned from low frequency radio astronomy available outside of Earth's ionosphere?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/34412)

### Update!

No, not even from cis-lunar space!

Because the interplanetary electron density is still too high.

@ProfRob's [comment](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/34412/what-can-be-learned-from-low-frequency-radio-astronomy-available-outside-of-eart#comment65891_34412) on the "What can be learned..." question reminds us:

> How low is "low"? The plasma frequency in the interplanetary medium near the Earth is about 100 kHz. <https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/519164>

and that answer goes into substantial detail on how to calculate the plasma frequency of various media.

The Chinese lunar orbiter [Queqiao](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chang%27e_4#Relay_satellite) had a low frequency receiver, and backing up ProfRob's point:

> Additionally, this satellite hosts the Netherlands–China Low-Frequency Explorer (NCLE), an instrument performing astrophysical studies in the unexplored radio regime of **80 kilohertz to 80 megahertz.** It was developed by the Radboud University in Netherlands and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The NCLE on the orbiter and the LFS on the lander work in synergy performing low-frequency **(0.1–80 MHz)** radio astronomical observations.

There are further references in the article.

It seems you must build a spacecraft and fly it into close proximity to Jupiter -- within a few attenuation lengths -- to hear the whistlers.

### More

Your reference [Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons](https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/) links to the Open Access Nature paper Y. Y. Shprits et al. (2018) [Strong whistler mode waves observed in the vicinity of Jupiter’s moons](https://rbm.epss.ucla.edu/strong-whistler-mode-waves-observed-in-the-vicinity-of-jupiters-moons/) which includes Figure 2. shown below.

From [Whistlers (radio)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio)):

> A whistler is a very low frequency or VLF electromagnetic (radio) wave generated by lightning.[1] Frequencies of terrestrial whistlers are 1 kHz to 30 kHz, with a maximum amplitude usually at 3 kHz to 5 kHz. Although they are electromagnetic waves, they occur at audio frequencies, and can be converted to audio using a suitable receiver. They are produced by lightning strikes (mostly intracloud and return-path) where the impulse travels along the Earth's magnetic field lines from one hemisphere to the other. They undergo dispersion of several kHz due to the slower velocity of the lower frequencies through the plasma environments of the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Thus they are perceived as a descending tone which can last for a few seconds. The study of whistlers categorizes them into Pure Note, Diffuse, 2-Hop, and Echo Train types.
>
> Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft detected whistler-like activity in the vicinity of Jupiter known as "Jovian Whistlers", supporting the visual observations of lightning made by Voyager 1

---

Figure 2 from the Nature paper linked above.

> Comparison of wave power and pitch angle distributions for the encounter on 6 September 1996 (orbital segment G2). a The distance between Ganymede and the Galileo spacecraft, b measurements of the magnetic field, c pitch angle distribution of 527–884 keV electron fluxes, d same as c but normalized by the value of fluxes at 60° local pitch angle, e dynamic spectrogram of electric field very low frequency (VLF) spectral density, f dynamic spectrogram of magnetic field VLF spectral density

[![Figure 2. Comparison of wave power and pitch angle distributions for the encounter on 6 September 1996 (orbital segment G2)](https://i.sstatic.net/vtH0K.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/vtH0K.png)


---

