<p>It's not impossible, but does require a bit if a special set-up.</p>

<p>Normally, the light from a star is redshifted mainly due to its velocity toward/away from us (a small, but important, contribution comes from gravitational redshift, when the light climbs up the potential of the star). Because stars tend to rotate, light coming from the side of the star rotating <em>away</em> from us is slightly more redshifted than the light coming from the side rotating <em>toward</em> us. If a large <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_prominence" rel="nofollow noreferrer">prominence</a> is present on one side, then because the prominence is hotter than the average surface temperature of the star and thus emits at shorter wavelengths, the combined spectrum will exhibit a larger redshift at short wavelengths.
Since the flux from the prominence alone is, after all, small compared to the total flux, the effect would be rather small, however.</p>

<p>A more common mechanism that may cause a differential redshift is stellar outflows. If large amounts of gas are being expelled (e.g. in protostars or AGB stars), then atoms and molecules in the outflowing material will absorb some of the light from the star. These absorption lines are then blue shifted wrt. the "systemic" velocity (i.e. the velocity of the star wrt. us), again skewing the redshift as a function of wavelength. A spectral line may even be seen both in emission and absorption, known as a so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_Cygni#P_Cygni_profile" rel="nofollow noreferrer">P-Cygni profile</a>. The figure below (from the Wiki article linked to) shows the same intrinsic wavelength (here H$\alpha$) both redshifted and blueshifted (by rotation and thermal motion), but the blueshifted light is absorbed by the outflowing atmosphere:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/lCqUR.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/lCqUR.png" alt="PCygni"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-22T12:43:06.660Z
2017-08-22T12:43:06.660Z
pela
<p>If I am not mistaken, when analyzing the spectrum of a star, in order to measure its redshift, we need to find several well known absorption lines (which occur at different wavelengths) shifted by the same amount: the redshift (actually we also need to characterize as well as possible the star too). It follows that you do not get different redshifts.</p>

<p>However, when looking at a nearby object at different wavelengths, the sun for example, we may be looking at different parts of it. These may be moving toward or away from us. There, you would see a redshift for parts moving away from us, but this is just the doppler effect from a moving object, nothing to do with the universe expanding. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-22T14:18:54.273Z
Why would a more distant part of the Sun be more redshifted?
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-22T14:25:44.497Z
I did not mean more distant, I meant getting away from us. We can observe a shift to the blue of coronal mass ejections towards earth (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2204.pdf)/ Analogously when there is a "depression" on the sun's surface, we could see some kind of redshift (albeit very small, I guess), or a CME with the rigth angle from earth's point of view. This is what I meant.
aarribas
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-22T18:16:42.803Z
Okay, I think perhaps the text is a bit confusing, then. Maybe edit "getting closer or further" to something like "moving toward or away from"?
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-22T12:50:02.377Z
2017-08-23T08:04:06.080Z
2017-08-23T08:04:06.080Z
aarribas
<p>Can one star be observed at different wave length show different redshift ? </p>

<redshift>
Redshift observation at different wave length
Edy A.
# Redshift observation at different wave length

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-08-22)

Can one star be observed at different wave length show different redshift ?

**Tags:** redshift

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-08-22. Score: 1

It's not impossible, but does require a bit if a special set-up.

Normally, the light from a star is redshifted mainly due to its velocity toward/away from us (a small, but important, contribution comes from gravitational redshift, when the light climbs up the potential of the star). Because stars tend to rotate, light coming from the side of the star rotating *away* from us is slightly more redshifted than the light coming from the side rotating *toward* us. If a large [prominence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_prominence) is present on one side, then because the prominence is hotter than the average surface temperature of the star and thus emits at shorter wavelengths, the combined spectrum will exhibit a larger redshift at short wavelengths.
Since the flux from the prominence alone is, after all, small compared to the total flux, the effect would be rather small, however.

A more common mechanism that may cause a differential redshift is stellar outflows. If large amounts of gas are being expelled (e.g. in protostars or AGB stars), then atoms and molecules in the outflowing material will absorb some of the light from the star. These absorption lines are then blue shifted wrt. the "systemic" velocity (i.e. the velocity of the star wrt. us), again skewing the redshift as a function of wavelength. A spectral line may even be seen both in emission and absorption, known as a so-called [P-Cygni profile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_Cygni#P_Cygni_profile). The figure below (from the Wiki article linked to) shows the same intrinsic wavelength (here H$\alpha$) both redshifted and blueshifted (by rotation and thermal motion), but the blueshifted light is absorbed by the outflowing atmosphere:

[![PCygni](https://i.sstatic.net/lCqUR.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/lCqUR.png)


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-08-22. Score: 0

If I am not mistaken, when analyzing the spectrum of a star, in order to measure its redshift, we need to find several well known absorption lines (which occur at different wavelengths) shifted by the same amount: the redshift (actually we also need to characterize as well as possible the star too). It follows that you do not get different redshifts.

However, when looking at a nearby object at different wavelengths, the sun for example, we may be looking at different parts of it. These may be moving toward or away from us. There, you would see a redshift for parts moving away from us, but this is just the doppler effect from a moving object, nothing to do with the universe expanding.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Why would a more distant part of the Sun be more redshifted?  
> **username_2**: I did not mean more distant, I meant getting away from us. We can observe a shift to the blue of coronal mass ejections towards earth (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2204.pdf)/ Analogously when there is a "depression" on the sun's surface, we could see some kind of redshift (albeit very small, I guess), or a CME with the rigth angle from earth's point of view. This is what I meant.  
> **username_1**: Okay, I think perhaps the text is a bit confusing, then. Maybe edit "getting closer or further" to something like "moving toward or away from"?  

---

