<p>Most of Messier's objects are too dim to be seen by the naked eye. The few that are visible were mostly listed as stars in older lists. </p>

<p>Edmund Halley lists 6 "luminous patches" which "discover themselves only by the telescope, and appear to the naked eye like small fixt stars" <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1947JRASC..41...69S" rel="nofollow">(Halley)</a>.</p>

<p>These include M42, in Orion, part of the sword (or what ever that is between the hunter's legs), and Omega Centuari, listed as a minor star in the centaur (roughly on the horse's back) in Bayer's list. </p>

<p>(The other objects on Halley's list were either known to be "cloud-like" [M31] or too faint for naked eye astronomy.]</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-30T22:59:52.280Z
2016-01-30T22:59:52.280Z
James K
<p>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion&#39;s_Sword" rel="nofollow">Sword of Orion</a> includes the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_Nebula" rel="nofollow">Great nebula in Orion</a> (M42), which is naked eye visible. Depending on the seeing, the nebula can be mistaken for a star.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-30T16:20:31.463Z
2016-01-30T16:20:31.463Z
Wayfaring Stranger
<p>Hopefully the title is very self-explanatory. I was wondering if there were any non-stellar objects, such as bright galaxies, which when looking with the naked eye were mistaken for stars in the time when asterisms were documented and catalogued...</p>

<p>For example, within the Big Dipper I believe it is Mizar which is in fact a binary star system. (Correct me if I am wrong!)  </p>

<p>I was hoping perhaps for distant yet bright Messier objects being mistaken for stars...</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-30T13:53:20.007Z
Most stars are binaries. And the middle "star" in Orion's sword is the Orion Nebula, aka M42.
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-01T16:20:31.193Z
If you're counting binaries(+) as "non-stellar", Alpha Centauri is a pretty obvious one...
Jeff Y
<constellations><night-sky>
Are there any bright non-stellar objects which make up asterisms?
MichaelJRoberts
# Are there any bright non-stellar objects which make up asterisms?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-01-30)

Hopefully the title is very self-explanatory. I was wondering if there were any non-stellar objects, such as bright galaxies, which when looking with the naked eye were mistaken for stars in the time when asterisms were documented and catalogued...

For example, within the Big Dipper I believe it is Mizar which is in fact a binary star system. (Correct me if I am wrong!)

I was hoping perhaps for distant yet bright Messier objects being mistaken for stars...

**Tags:** constellations, night-sky
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Most stars are binaries. And the middle "star" in Orion's sword is the Orion Nebula, aka M42.  
> **username_2**: If you're counting binaries(+) as "non-stellar", Alpha Centauri is a pretty obvious one...  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-01-30. Score: 3

Most of Messier's objects are too dim to be seen by the naked eye. The few that are visible were mostly listed as stars in older lists.

Edmund Halley lists 6 "luminous patches" which "discover themselves only by the telescope, and appear to the naked eye like small fixt stars" [(Halley)](http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1947JRASC..41...69S).

These include M42, in Orion, part of the sword (or what ever that is between the hunter's legs), and Omega Centuari, listed as a minor star in the centaur (roughly on the horse's back) in Bayer's list.

(The other objects on Halley's list were either known to be "cloud-like" [M31] or too faint for naked eye astronomy.]


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2016-01-30. Score: 2

The [Sword of Orion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion's_Sword) includes the [Great nebula in Orion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_Nebula) (M42), which is naked eye visible. Depending on the seeing, the nebula can be mistaken for a star.


---

