Answers.Body: <p>It seems to me that empathy is based on understanding the experience of another entity:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>originally Psychology. The ability to understand and appreciate another person's feelings, experience, etc. <br><sub>SOURCE: <a href="https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/61284?redirectedFrom=empathy#eid" rel="nofollow noreferrer">OED</a></sub></p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Using this definition, the AI would have to understand human experience.  (There may be a "Chinese Room" issue in terms of whether one considers the algorithm to truly "understand".  But, if it can classify the input sufficiently to produce an appropriate response, that can constitute understanding.)</p>
  
  <p>The underlying problem is that the algorithm likely doesn't "feel" in the same way humans experience emotions, in that the human experience is colored by chemical response.  So while the algorithm might be able to demonstrate sufficient "understanding" of a human's experience, and act in an empathetic manner, the degree of understanding may always be limited.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-03-01T22:28:15.623Z
Answers.Text: Would you agree that the example I just provided classifies the input sufficiently and produces an appropriately aligned response?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jaume Oliver Lafont
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-18T21:10:43.363Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-18T21:31:55.023Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-18T21:31:55.023Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: DukeZhou
Answers.Body: <p>Empathy is about living and values, just as someone can be a good person, or a bad person, based on their education, culture, past experience and values, just as I who recently became a father became much more empathic about my parents.</p>
  
  <p>If it's really a semi-programmed artificial intelligence that captures around you the experience with your programmers, with people, with the environment, etc., and somehow is set to learn from it, I believe you can develop some kind of “ empathy ”, but as Jaume said, it won't be“ natural ”</p>
  
  <p>We have to remember that real artificial intelligence is the one that absorbs and learns, not a set of IF's and ELSE's.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-19T19:59:01.263Z
Answers.Text: I don't see a contradiction between learning and using a set of IF-ELSE to "classify the input properly" (from DukeZhou's answer), especially if conditions can change as more information is available. Were you thinking about predefined, static conditions?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jaume Oliver Lafont
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-19T20:01:18.253Z
Answers.Text: I also see no problem, after all for presets would have to have some IF-ELSE as input, just as you said.
  
  But I was thinking of setting empathy as something "fixed" to having a predefined "forced" empathy
Answers.UserDisplayName: Edson Filho
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-18T19:10:47.877Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-18T19:10:47.877Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Edson Filho
Answers.Body: <p>Let us describe a very simple system that does something we could label as empathyc.</p>
  <p>A chatbot answers &quot;I am sorry to hear that. What happened?&quot; when we type &quot;I feel bad&quot;, and it replies &quot;I am glad to hear that. Fancy some music?&quot; when we type &quot;I feel good&quot;.</p>
  <p>Somehow, it perceives a human emotion, and acts accordingly.</p>
  <p>Planes fly but they do not fly as birds. Similarly, we can expect <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_empathy" rel="nofollow noreferrer">artificial empathy</a> from an AI, not necessarily natural empathy as we feel it.</p>
  <p>Here is a related paper, <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2022.933261/full" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Shared Laughter Generation for Empathetic Spoken Language</a></p>
  <p>And here is an actual example:</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/uzW3t.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/uzW3t.jpg" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
  <p>The system correctly maps tears to sadness and outputs a proper answer, while also explaining its non-sentience. Not bad!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-09T20:18:49.847Z
Answers.Text: Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105370/discussion-on-answer-by-jaume-oliver-lafont-will-we-be-able-to-build-an-artifici).
Answers.UserDisplayName: nbro
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-22T03:28:37.193Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-03-01T22:37:39.423Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-03-01T22:37:39.423Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jaume Oliver Lafont
Body: <p>Nowadays, robots or artificial agents often only perform the specific task they have been programmed to do.</p>
  
  <p>Will we be able to build an artificial intelligence that feels empathy, that understands the emotions and feelings of humans, and, based on that, act accordingly?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-04-21T19:04:22.167Z
Comments.Text: A very related question (if not a duplicate): [Could an AI feel emotions?](https://ai.stackexchange.com/q/2277/2444).
Comments.UserDisplayName: nbro
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-04-21T19:17:02.250Z
Comments.Text: This could maybe be considered an extreme version of the value alignment problem.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Philip Raeisghasem
Tags: <ai-design><philosophy><emotional-intelligence>
Title: Will we be able to build an artificial intelligence that feels empathy?
UserDisplayName: Maryam Abbas
ThreadText: # Will we be able to build an artificial intelligence that feels empathy?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-04-21)
  
  Nowadays, robots or artificial agents often only perform the specific task they have been programmed to do.
  
  Will we be able to build an artificial intelligence that feels empathy, that understands the emotions and feelings of humans, and, based on that, act accordingly?
  
  **Tags:** ai-design, philosophy, emotional-intelligence
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: A very related question (if not a duplicate): [Could an AI feel emotions?](https://ai.stackexchange.com/q/2277/2444).  
  > **username_2**: This could maybe be considered an extreme version of the value alignment problem.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-04-22. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  Let us describe a very simple system that does something we could label as empathyc.
  
  A chatbot answers "I am sorry to hear that. What happened?" when we type "I feel bad", and it replies "I am glad to hear that. Fancy some music?" when we type "I feel good".
  
  Somehow, it perceives a human emotion, and acts accordingly.
  
  Planes fly but they do not fly as birds. Similarly, we can expect [artificial empathy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_empathy) from an AI, not necessarily natural empathy as we feel it.
  
  Here is a related paper, [Shared Laughter Generation for Empathetic Spoken Language](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2022.933261/full)
  
  And here is an actual example:
  
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/uzW3t.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/uzW3t.jpg)
  
  The system correctly maps tears to sadness and outputs a proper answer, while also explaining its non-sentience. Not bad!
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105370/discussion-on-answer-by-jaume-oliver-lafont-will-we-be-able-to-build-an-artifici).  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-09-18. Score: 2
  
  It seems to me that empathy is based on understanding the experience of another entity:
  
  > originally Psychology. The ability to understand and appreciate another person's feelings, experience, etc.   
  > SOURCE: [OED](https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/61284?redirectedFrom=empathy#eid)
  
  Using this definition, the AI would have to understand human experience. (There may be a "Chinese Room" issue in terms of whether one considers the algorithm to truly "understand". But, if it can classify the input sufficiently to produce an appropriate response, that can constitute understanding.)
  
  The underlying problem is that the algorithm likely doesn't "feel" in the same way humans experience emotions, in that the human experience is colored by chemical response. So while the algorithm might be able to demonstrate sufficient "understanding" of a human's experience, and act in an empathetic manner, the degree of understanding may always be limited.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: Would you agree that the example I just provided classifies the input sufficiently and produces an appropriately aligned response?  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-09-18. Score: 1
  
  Empathy is about living and values, just as someone can be a good person, or a bad person, based on their education, culture, past experience and values, just as I who recently became a father became much more empathic about my parents.
  
  If it's really a semi-programmed artificial intelligence that captures around you the experience with your programmers, with people, with the environment, etc., and somehow is set to learn from it, I believe you can develop some kind of “ empathy ”, but as Jaume said, it won't be“ natural ”
  
  We have to remember that real artificial intelligence is the one that absorbs and learns, not a set of IF's and ELSE's.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: I don't see a contradiction between learning and using a set of IF-ELSE to "classify the input properly" (from DukeZhou's answer), especially if conditions can change as more information is available. Were you thinking about predefined, static conditions?  
  > **username_5**: I also see no problem, after all for presets would have to have some IF-ELSE as input, just as you said.  But I was thinking of setting empathy as something "fixed" to having a predefined "forced" empathy  
  
  ---
  
  