Answers.Body: <blockquote>
  <p>My understanding is that AI can be understood as a very generalized and abstract statistics software package handling input data in a general way to find the &quot;best fit&quot; to some form of problem. Is that correct? I know it isn't. But is it vaguely correct?</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>No. It's not correct, in my opinion, not even vaguely and in many ways.</p>
  <ul>
  <li>AI is not (necessarily) abstract (although there are examples of theoretical frameworks of AI, such as <a href="https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/10377/2444">AIXI</a>, which may be of interest to you, given that you are about to become a theoretical physicist)</li>
  <li>AI does not necessarily generalize statistics or statistical concepts</li>
  <li>AI is not just machine learning or, more precisely, supervised learning. You're very likely referring to <em>supervised learning</em> when you say &quot;best fit&quot;, but there are other forms of learning (such as <a href="http://incompleteideas.net/book/RLbook2020.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">reinforcement learning</a>) and there are other aspects of AI apart from learning, such as perception, control, etc. Some people sometimes claim that machine learning is glorified statistics, but, although the two are similar and related, I don't think that's exactly correct.</li>
  </ul>
  <p>To know what AI is, you should read the book <a href="http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach</a>. If you want to know what machine learning is, then there are many books that you can read, such as <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Etom/mlbook.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Machine Learning</a> (1997) by Tom M. Mitchell. If you are interested in the relationship between machine learning and statistics, you may be interested in <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/6/82135">this post</a>. You should also read <a href="https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/11387/2444">this answer</a>, which describes what AI is or may refer to. <a href="https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/53/2444">This answer</a> gives a nice brief description of the difference between AI and ML.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-01-15T19:36:21.450Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-01-15T19:57:11.433Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2021-01-15T19:57:11.433Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: nbro
Body: <p>I am a (soon-to-become, to be honest) theoretical physicist. I want to learn a bit about AI. So as you know in physics we develop theories based on as few and as simple basic equations as possible which shall explain as much of the experimental results and observations as possible. I feel that this is kind of not how AI solves problems.</p>
  <p>My understanding is that AI can be understood as a very generalized and abstract statistics software package handling input data in a general way to find the &quot;best fit&quot; to some form of problem. Is that correct? I know it isn't. But is it vaguely correct?</p>
  <p>I give you an example. In weather prediction there is a technique called MOS (model output statistics). It collects output from numerical weather prediction models (simulation software) as well as observational data and finds statistical relations between them to correct the model output for errors. For example, it might be that the intensity of precipitation in London is on average underestimated by the model by 10 %, so MOS will correct for that. Over time, it improves itself, because it collects more and more data. Is this already a form of AI?</p>
  
Tags: <machine-learning><comparison><definitions><statistical-ai><statistics>
Title: Can AI be understood as a generalized statistics tool?
UserDisplayName: Max H. Balsmeier
ThreadText: # Can AI be understood as a generalized statistics tool?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-01-15)
  
  I am a (soon-to-become, to be honest) theoretical physicist. I want to learn a bit about AI. So as you know in physics we develop theories based on as few and as simple basic equations as possible which shall explain as much of the experimental results and observations as possible. I feel that this is kind of not how AI solves problems.
  
  My understanding is that AI can be understood as a very generalized and abstract statistics software package handling input data in a general way to find the "best fit" to some form of problem. Is that correct? I know it isn't. But is it vaguely correct?
  
  I give you an example. In weather prediction there is a technique called MOS (model output statistics). It collects output from numerical weather prediction models (simulation software) as well as observational data and finds statistical relations between them to correct the model output for errors. For example, it might be that the intensity of precipitation in London is on average underestimated by the model by 10 %, so MOS will correct for that. Over time, it improves itself, because it collects more and more data. Is this already a form of AI?
  
  **Tags:** machine-learning, comparison, definitions, statistical-ai, statistics
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2021-01-15. Score: 1
  
  > My understanding is that AI can be understood as a very generalized and abstract statistics software package handling input data in a general way to find the "best fit" to some form of problem. Is that correct? I know it isn't. But is it vaguely correct?
  
  No. It's not correct, in my opinion, not even vaguely and in many ways.
  
  * AI is not (necessarily) abstract (although there are examples of theoretical frameworks of AI, such as [AIXI](https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/10377/2444), which may be of interest to you, given that you are about to become a theoretical physicist)
  * AI does not necessarily generalize statistics or statistical concepts
  * AI is not just machine learning or, more precisely, supervised learning. You're very likely referring to *supervised learning* when you say "best fit", but there are other forms of learning (such as [reinforcement learning](http://incompleteideas.net/book/RLbook2020.pdf)) and there are other aspects of AI apart from learning, such as perception, control, etc. Some people sometimes claim that machine learning is glorified statistics, but, although the two are similar and related, I don't think that's exactly correct.
  
  To know what AI is, you should read the book [Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach](http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/). If you want to know what machine learning is, then there are many books that you can read, such as [Machine Learning](http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Etom/mlbook.html) (1997) by Tom M. Mitchell. If you are interested in the relationship between machine learning and statistics, you may be interested in [this post](https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/6/82135). You should also read [this answer](https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/11387/2444), which describes what AI is or may refer to. [This answer](https://ai.stackexchange.com/a/53/2444) gives a nice brief description of the difference between AI and ML.
  
  
  ---
  
  