Answers.Body: <p>Current limitations in our knowledge mean that the question is not <em>directly</em> answerable:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li><p>There is no scientific consensus on what consciousness is. Therefore any device designed to "be conscious" is necessarily going to be built on the premise of unsupported, maybe fringe, theory.</p></li>
  <li><p>There is no robust measure of consciousness. If any AI system was built in order to exhibit conscious behaviour, there would be no way to prove it is conscious. There is no general agreement or theory on whether any particular animal species is conscious for example. This is often limited by communication. Of the few animals smart enough to be trained in communication with humans, there <em>appears</em> to be conscious behaviour. Researcher opinion ranges from "all non-humans do not possess consciousness" to "all animals have some degree of consciousness".</p></li>
  <li><p>There is incomplete understanding of what the <em>components</em> of consciousness are. A bottom-up build of a conscious machine requires a baseline theory of what those components are.</p></li>
  <li><p>We may be able to ignore lack of knowledge and take a very high level of abstraction, such as A-life or evolutionary approach where nothing is assumed and the hope is that consciousness would spontaneously emerge from a complex enough simulation (as we assume it has done with organic life in the real world). However, this would seem to require many orders of magnitude more computing power than is currently possible.</p></li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>To answer the question as written:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>Can the first emergence of consciousness in the Evolution be replicated in AI?</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Despite the many books, articles and posts written on this subject over many years, the answer is two-fold:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li><p>We do not know of any fundamental reason why AI could not be conscious.</p></li>
  <li><p>We have no theory or experimental proof that AI can replicate consciousness.</p></li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>I would go further than this, and say that anyone who tells you otherwise on these two points has already subscribed to some unproven theory of consciousness. </p>
  
  <p>As well as well-thought-out peer-reviewed theories and experiments by scientists and researchers, there is a <em>lot</em> of pseudo-scientific junk published on the internet on this subject. So take care if researching reading material.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-02-07T08:15:50.583Z
Answers.Text: @Bobs: Potentially. However, that is *already* a statement from "some unproven theory of consciousness". There is absolutely no evidence that consciousness cannot be achieved physically via evolution. In that regards, all we have is a big question: *How did life on Earth result in conscious systems?* The answer to date: We don't know.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Neil Slater
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-01-27T13:53:19.733Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-01-27T13:59:58.723Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2018-01-27T13:59:58.723Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Neil Slater
Answers.Body: <p>It partly depends on the framing of the question, in terms of how you are defining consciousness.  </p>
  
  <p>Neil Slater's answer is comprehensive, and his warnings about pseudo-science and junk publication should be heeded.</p>
  
  <p>However, since you frame this in the context of "<em>Can the first emergence of consciousness in evolution</em> be replicated in AI", I feel like I can provide an answer.</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>If we define rudimentary consciousness as simple awareness of the environment, distinct from higher functions such as self-consciousness, then yes.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>Under this definition, any algorithm that takes input is "conscious".  This in no way represents human-level consciousness, or even the consciousness of higher animals, but is more akin to simple organisms such as microbes.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-02-14T20:34:52.160Z
Answers.Text: I personally have no doubt human reactions are largely mechanistic, and would surely be deterministic if quantum theory didn't open the door to true randomness in nature (validity of free will tbd.)  But thank you for recognizing my reduction of the question.  This is a complex problem, so starting small is likely the way to go.
Answers.UserDisplayName: DukeZhou
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-01-27T22:07:57.710Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-01-27T22:07:57.710Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: DukeZhou
Answers.Body: <p>I see in all the answers a conflation of consciousness with self-consciousness.  I don't think anyone would disagree with the statement: &quot;all living organisms exhibit some degree of awareness of their environment&quot; -- even a mosquito is &quot;aware&quot; of the air pressure changes caused by the hand attempting to smack it.  That would correspond to consciousness.  The issue is really the attainment of self-consciousness, that is, the &quot;awareness of one's own awareness&quot;, i.e., that &quot;self-awareness&quot; that homo sapiens is the only one to have manifested up to the present. In this view a definition of &quot;self-consciousness&quot; arises as follows: self-consciousness is attained whenever consciousness takes itself as an object. In this view, the evolution of consciousness is seen as reaching the level above mere &quot;awareness&quot; (shared, as said before, by all living organisms) into awareness of the awareness of the self. The background exposition of this definition of self-consciousness was first first proposed in the late 90s by the &quot;modern teleologues&quot;, an anonymous group that produced a substantial output of theory in France and Canada. As regards AI, the jury is still out as to whether it will be able to become self-conscious and I consider the question an open-ended one.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-09T17:55:32.873Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2024-05-09T17:55:32.873Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Raphael Pallais
Body: <p>At some point in time during the evolution, because of some factors, some beings first started to become conscious of themselves and their surroundings. That conscious experience is beyond some mere sensory reflexive actions trained. Can that be possible with AI?</p>
  
Tags: <philosophy><evolutionary-algorithms><artificial-consciousness>
Title: Can the first emergence of consciousness in evolution be replicated in AI?
UserDisplayName: Vivek Krishna
ThreadText: # Can the first emergence of consciousness in evolution be replicated in AI?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2018-01-27)
  
  At some point in time during the evolution, because of some factors, some beings first started to become conscious of themselves and their surroundings. That conscious experience is beyond some mere sensory reflexive actions trained. Can that be possible with AI?
  
  **Tags:** philosophy, evolutionary-algorithms, artificial-consciousness
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2018-01-27. Score: 3
  
  Current limitations in our knowledge mean that the question is not *directly* answerable:
  
  * There is no scientific consensus on what consciousness is. Therefore any device designed to "be conscious" is necessarily going to be built on the premise of unsupported, maybe fringe, theory.
  * There is no robust measure of consciousness. If any AI system was built in order to exhibit conscious behaviour, there would be no way to prove it is conscious. There is no general agreement or theory on whether any particular animal species is conscious for example. This is often limited by communication. Of the few animals smart enough to be trained in communication with humans, there *appears* to be conscious behaviour. Researcher opinion ranges from "all non-humans do not possess consciousness" to "all animals have some degree of consciousness".
  * There is incomplete understanding of what the *components* of consciousness are. A bottom-up build of a conscious machine requires a baseline theory of what those components are.
  * We may be able to ignore lack of knowledge and take a very high level of abstraction, such as A-life or evolutionary approach where nothing is assumed and the hope is that consciousness would spontaneously emerge from a complex enough simulation (as we assume it has done with organic life in the real world). However, this would seem to require many orders of magnitude more computing power than is currently possible.
  
  To answer the question as written:
  
  > Can the first emergence of consciousness in the Evolution be replicated in AI?
  
  Despite the many books, articles and posts written on this subject over many years, the answer is two-fold:
  
  * We do not know of any fundamental reason why AI could not be conscious.
  * We have no theory or experimental proof that AI can replicate consciousness.
  
  I would go further than this, and say that anyone who tells you otherwise on these two points has already subscribed to some unproven theory of consciousness.
  
  As well as well-thought-out peer-reviewed theories and experiments by scientists and researchers, there is a *lot* of pseudo-scientific junk published on the internet on this subject. So take care if researching reading material.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: @Bobs: Potentially. However, that is *already* a statement from "some unproven theory of consciousness". There is absolutely no evidence that consciousness cannot be achieved physically via evolution. In that regards, all we have is a big question: *How did life on Earth result in conscious systems?* The answer to date: We don't know.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2018-01-27. Score: 0
  
  It partly depends on the framing of the question, in terms of how you are defining consciousness.
  
  Neil Slater's answer is comprehensive, and his warnings about pseudo-science and junk publication should be heeded.
  
  However, since you frame this in the context of "*Can the first emergence of consciousness in evolution* be replicated in AI", I feel like I can provide an answer.
  
  * If we define rudimentary consciousness as simple awareness of the environment, distinct from higher functions such as self-consciousness, then yes.
  
  Under this definition, any algorithm that takes input is "conscious". This in no way represents human-level consciousness, or even the consciousness of higher animals, but is more akin to simple organisms such as microbes.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: I personally have no doubt human reactions are largely mechanistic, and would surely be deterministic if quantum theory didn't open the door to true randomness in nature (validity of free will tbd.)  But thank you for recognizing my reduction of the question.  This is a complex problem, so starting small is likely the way to go.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2024-05-09. Score: -1
  
  I see in all the answers a conflation of consciousness with self-consciousness. I don't think anyone would disagree with the statement: "all living organisms exhibit some degree of awareness of their environment" -- even a mosquito is "aware" of the air pressure changes caused by the hand attempting to smack it. That would correspond to consciousness. The issue is really the attainment of self-consciousness, that is, the "awareness of one's own awareness", i.e., that "self-awareness" that homo sapiens is the only one to have manifested up to the present. In this view a definition of "self-consciousness" arises as follows: self-consciousness is attained whenever consciousness takes itself as an object. In this view, the evolution of consciousness is seen as reaching the level above mere "awareness" (shared, as said before, by all living organisms) into awareness of the awareness of the self. The background exposition of this definition of self-consciousness was first first proposed in the late 90s by the "modern teleologues", an anonymous group that produced a substantial output of theory in France and Canada. As regards AI, the jury is still out as to whether it will be able to become self-conscious and I consider the question an open-ended one.
  
  
  ---
  
  