Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>I came across a news article from 2018 where the president of India was saying that Sanskrit is the best language for ML/AI.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>A very interesting statement indeed! Globally, there is very little interest in NLP for Sanskrit compared to very many other languages.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>Especially given the fact that humans still have to first learn Sanskrit in case NLP is done in Sanskrit.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Most people would say that NLP tools are meant to cater to the needs of humans, instead of requiring humans to learn a new language to be able to benefit from tools (which is a <em>huge</em> barrier).</p>
  
  <p>To answer your question more clearly, it is not that the research community selects languages for research based on "suitability" of the language. Instead, in general the intention of NLP research is to grapple with problems that are relevant, impact many people - or are funded (unfortunately :-).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-29T08:37:27.163Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-29T08:37:27.163Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mathias Müller
Body: <p>I came across a news article from 2018 where the president of India was saying that Sanskrit is the best language for ML/AI. I have no idea regarding his qualification on either AI or Sanskrit to say this but this idea has been floated earlier in the context of NLP. Specifically, Rick Briggs <a href="http://vedicsciences.net/articles/sanskrit-nasa.html" rel="noreferrer">had said so</a> in 1985.</p>
  
  <p>I know elementary Sanskrit and I know NLP. I can understand the point that as a strongly declined language Sanskrit is less ambiguous than say English as the position of words in a sentence are not important. Add to it the fact that words are also declined (that's not the technical term for verbs and I am not sure what is) so that verb gender and number help identify which entity they refer to.</p>
  
  <p>However, that point was valid in 1985. My question is that post the Deep Learning revolution of the last couple of years is it still relevant? Especially given the fact that humans still have to first learn Sanskrit in case NLP is done in Sanskrit.</p>
  
  <p>Of course, as can be guessed from the tone of the question, I am of the opinion that Sanskrit is not relevant for AI now but I wanted to know if someone who works in AI thinks otherwise and if so what is their reason so think so.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-12T19:31:38.027Z
Comments.Text: Sorry I don't understand and someone else has mentioned something similar in private communications so I'd be grateful if you could elaborate. Why are we comparing programming languages with Sanskrit for NLP? I thought the idea was that humans communicate in Sanskrit and then an AI system can work on it. If its about programming languages there were plenty of them around in 1985 so what was Briggs talking about?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Borun Chowdhury
Tags: <natural-language-processing>
Title: Is Sanskrit still relevant for NLP/AI?
UserDisplayName: Borun Chowdhury
ThreadText: # Is Sanskrit still relevant for NLP/AI?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-01-12)
  
  I came across a news article from 2018 where the president of India was saying that Sanskrit is the best language for ML/AI. I have no idea regarding his qualification on either AI or Sanskrit to say this but this idea has been floated earlier in the context of NLP. Specifically, Rick Briggs [had said so](http://vedicsciences.net/articles/sanskrit-nasa.html) in 1985.
  
  I know elementary Sanskrit and I know NLP. I can understand the point that as a strongly declined language Sanskrit is less ambiguous than say English as the position of words in a sentence are not important. Add to it the fact that words are also declined (that's not the technical term for verbs and I am not sure what is) so that verb gender and number help identify which entity they refer to.
  
  However, that point was valid in 1985. My question is that post the Deep Learning revolution of the last couple of years is it still relevant? Especially given the fact that humans still have to first learn Sanskrit in case NLP is done in Sanskrit.
  
  Of course, as can be guessed from the tone of the question, I am of the opinion that Sanskrit is not relevant for AI now but I wanted to know if someone who works in AI thinks otherwise and if so what is their reason so think so.
  
  **Tags:** natural-language-processing
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Sorry I don't understand and someone else has mentioned something similar in private communications so I'd be grateful if you could elaborate. Why are we comparing programming languages with Sanskrit for NLP? I thought the idea was that humans communicate in Sanskrit and then an AI system can work on it. If its about programming languages there were plenty of them around in 1985 so what was Briggs talking about?  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-01-29. Score: 2
  
  > I came across a news article from 2018 where the president of India was saying that Sanskrit is the best language for ML/AI.
  
  A very interesting statement indeed! Globally, there is very little interest in NLP for Sanskrit compared to very many other languages.
  
  > Especially given the fact that humans still have to first learn Sanskrit in case NLP is done in Sanskrit.
  
  Most people would say that NLP tools are meant to cater to the needs of humans, instead of requiring humans to learn a new language to be able to benefit from tools (which is a *huge* barrier).
  
  To answer your question more clearly, it is not that the research community selects languages for research based on "suitability" of the language. Instead, in general the intention of NLP research is to grapple with problems that are relevant, impact many people - or are funded (unfortunately :-).
  
  
  ---
  
  