Answers.Body: <p>I would define intelligence as a ability to predict future. So if someone is intelligent, he can predict some aspects of future, and decide what to do based on his predictions. So, if "intelligent" person decide to hurt other persons, he might be very effective at this (for example Hitler and his staff). </p>
  
  <p>Artificial intelligence might be extremely effective at predicting some aspects of uncertain future. And this IMHO leads to two negative scenarios:</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li>Someone programs it for hurting people. Either by mistake or on purpose.</li>
  <li>Artificial intelligence will be designed for doing something safe, but at some point, to be more effective, it will redesign itself and maybe it will remove obstacles from its way. So if humans become obstacles, they will be removed very quickly and in very effective way.</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>Of course, there are also positive scenarios, but you are not asking about them.</p>
  
  <p>I recommend reading this cool post about artificial superintelligence and possible outcomes of creating it: <a href="http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-12-15T08:24:04.450Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-12-16T08:44:06.403Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-12-16T08:44:06.403Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Damian Melniczuk
Answers.Body: <p><em>There is no doubt that AI has the potential to pose an existential threat to humanity.</em></p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>The greatest threat to mankind lies with superintelligent AI.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>An artificial intelligence that surpasses human intelligence will be capable of exponentially increasing its own intelligence, resulting in an AI system that, to humans, will be completely unstoppable.</p>
  
  <p>At this stage, if the artificial intelligence system decides that humanity is no longer useful, it could wipe us from the face of the earth.</p>
  
  <p>As Eliezer Yudkowsky puts it in <strong>Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk</strong>,</p>
  
  <p>"The AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else."</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>A different threat lies with the instruction of highly intelligent AI</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Here it is useful to consider the paper clip maximiser thought experiment.</p>
  
  <p>A highly intelligent AI instructed to maximise paper clip production might take the following steps to achieve its goal.</p>
  
  <p>1) Achieve an intelligence explosion to make itself superintelligent (this will increase paperclip optimisation efficiency)</p>
  
  <p>2) Wipe out mankind so that it cannot be disabled (that would minimise production and be inefficient)</p>
  
  <p>3) Use Earth's resources (including the planet itself) to build self replicating robots hosting the AI</p>
  
  <p>4) Exponentially spread out across the universe, harvesting planets and stars alike, turning them into materials to build paper clip factories</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>Clearly this is not what the human who's business paperclip production it was wanted, however it is the best way to fulfil the AI's instructions.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>This illustrates how superintelligent and highly intelligent AI systems can be the greatest existential risk mankind may ever face.</p>
  
  <p>Murray Shanahan, in <strong>The Technological Singularity</strong>, even proposed that AI may be the solution to the Fermi paradox: the reason why we see no intelligent life in the universe may be that once a civilisation becomes advanced enough, it will develop an AI that ultimately destroys it.
  This is known as the idea of a <strong>cosmic filter</strong>.</p>
  
  <p>In conclusion, the very intelligence that makes AI so useful also makes it extremely dangerous.</p>
  
  <p>Influential figures like Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have expressed concerns that superintelligent AI is the greatest threat we will ever have to face.</p>
  
  <p>Hope that answers your question :)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-12-16T09:44:05.277Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-08-13T05:19:52.210Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2018-08-13T05:19:52.210Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: GJZ
Body: <p>We are doing research, spending hours figuring out how we can make real AI software (intelligent agents) to work better. We are also trying to implement some applications e.g. in business, health and education, using the AI technology.</p>
  
  <p>Nonetheless, so far, most of us have ignored the "dark" side of artificial intelligence. For instance, an "unethical" person could buy thousands of cheap drones, arm them with guns, and send them out firing on the public. This would be an "unethical" application of AI.</p>
  
  <p>Could there be (in the future) existential threats to humanity due to AI?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-08-13T05:35:28.337Z
Comments.Text: Any technology has the potential to be existential threat to humanity.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Ankur
Tags: <human-like><applications><cyberterrorism>
Title: Could there be existential threats to humanity due to AI?
UserDisplayName: quintumnia
ThreadText: # Could there be existential threats to humanity due to AI?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-12-15)
  
  We are doing research, spending hours figuring out how we can make real AI software (intelligent agents) to work better. We are also trying to implement some applications e.g. in business, health and education, using the AI technology.
  
  Nonetheless, so far, most of us have ignored the "dark" side of artificial intelligence. For instance, an "unethical" person could buy thousands of cheap drones, arm them with guns, and send them out firing on the public. This would be an "unethical" application of AI.
  
  Could there be (in the future) existential threats to humanity due to AI?
  
  **Tags:** human-like, applications, cyberterrorism
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Any technology has the potential to be existential threat to humanity.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2016-12-15. Score: 2 | Accepted answer
  
  I would define intelligence as a ability to predict future. So if someone is intelligent, he can predict some aspects of future, and decide what to do based on his predictions. So, if "intelligent" person decide to hurt other persons, he might be very effective at this (for example Hitler and his staff).
  
  Artificial intelligence might be extremely effective at predicting some aspects of uncertain future. And this IMHO leads to two negative scenarios:
  
  1. Someone programs it for hurting people. Either by mistake or on purpose.
  2. Artificial intelligence will be designed for doing something safe, but at some point, to be more effective, it will redesign itself and maybe it will remove obstacles from its way. So if humans become obstacles, they will be removed very quickly and in very effective way.
  
  Of course, there are also positive scenarios, but you are not asking about them.
  
  I recommend reading this cool post about artificial superintelligence and possible outcomes of creating it: <http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2016-12-16. Score: 4
  
  *There is no doubt that AI has the potential to pose an existential threat to humanity.*
  
  > The greatest threat to mankind lies with superintelligent AI.
  
  An artificial intelligence that surpasses human intelligence will be capable of exponentially increasing its own intelligence, resulting in an AI system that, to humans, will be completely unstoppable.
  
  At this stage, if the artificial intelligence system decides that humanity is no longer useful, it could wipe us from the face of the earth.
  
  As Eliezer Yudkowsky puts it in **Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk**,
  
  "The AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else."
  
  > A different threat lies with the instruction of highly intelligent AI
  
  Here it is useful to consider the paper clip maximiser thought experiment.
  
  A highly intelligent AI instructed to maximise paper clip production might take the following steps to achieve its goal.
  
  1) Achieve an intelligence explosion to make itself superintelligent (this will increase paperclip optimisation efficiency)
  
  2) Wipe out mankind so that it cannot be disabled (that would minimise production and be inefficient)
  
  3) Use Earth's resources (including the planet itself) to build self replicating robots hosting the AI
  
  4) Exponentially spread out across the universe, harvesting planets and stars alike, turning them into materials to build paper clip factories
  
  > Clearly this is not what the human who's business paperclip production it was wanted, however it is the best way to fulfil the AI's instructions.
  
  This illustrates how superintelligent and highly intelligent AI systems can be the greatest existential risk mankind may ever face.
  
  Murray Shanahan, in **The Technological Singularity**, even proposed that AI may be the solution to the Fermi paradox: the reason why we see no intelligent life in the universe may be that once a civilisation becomes advanced enough, it will develop an AI that ultimately destroys it.
  This is known as the idea of a **cosmic filter**.
  
  In conclusion, the very intelligence that makes AI so useful also makes it extremely dangerous.
  
  Influential figures like Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have expressed concerns that superintelligent AI is the greatest threat we will ever have to face.
  
  Hope that answers your question :)
  
  
  ---
  
  