<p>An option that might be feasible for some situations (depending on your setup) is <strong>Sequential Printing</strong> - a feature provided by some slicing software, for instance <a href="http://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/sequential-printing">Slic3r</a>.</p>

<p>In short, this allows you to print multiple objects <strong>one at a time</strong> rather than simultaneously. This has some obvious benefits, but also some downsides:</p>

<p><strong>Benefits:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>Each object is finished individually, and you will therefore not have multiple half-finished prints <em>when</em> something goes wrong. </li>
<li>No particular printer or bed swapping mechanic is needed.</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Downsides:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>With most consumer printer, print area is somewhat limited, and sequential printing requires you to place objects so that the hot end can move freely between the finished objects, potentially restricting the effective usage of your print volume.</li>
<li>By printing objects one at a time, you limit the natural print cooling that happens when printing multiple objects at the same time. In particular for smaller prints, you might not want to print sequentially unless your print cooling solution is up for it.</li>
<li>Requires some setup</li>
</ul>

<p>You specifically mention that you would like the finished prints to be moved outside the print area. In it self, sequential printing does not do this for you; however, if you fit your printer with a large, motorized print bed, you might achieve the same effect without moving into unfamiliar technology!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-14T15:17:25.660Z
I like the "when something goes wrong" lol Because if you own a home 3D printer, you'll understand!
tbm0115
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-14T16:07:00.280Z
@tbm0115, indeed! I normally remember to use sequential printing only after failing a multi-print job!
Tormod Haugene
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-13T06:21:21.800Z
2016-01-13T06:26:27.453Z
2016-01-13T06:26:27.453Z
Tormod Haugene
<p>It would be possible and not too terribly difficult to rig a servo or solenoid with a push plate like a plow, on top of your build plate. </p>

<p>However this would require another processor via raspberry pi or arduino to control it. Scripting execution when the print has completed wouldn't be terribly difficult either, but it isn't readily available and certainly isn't part of a mass produced printer. </p>

<p>My issue with the concept is if you push a bunch of prints off the build plate, what guarantee do you have they wont become damaged in the process?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-14T15:21:59.300Z
Like this? http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:872617
tbm0115
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-13T12:30:23.473Z
2016-01-13T12:30:23.473Z
Pete
<p>I've recently seen a video of this being done successfully with almost no hardware modifications to the printer.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I can't find the video itself any more, but the basic idea is to use the print head/gantry to knock the finished prints off the table, likely by adding some custom commands to the end of the sliced G-code. After the print is finished, the bed moves to the Y endstop (this was done on a bedslinger printer), the head is lowered to about half of the parts' height, then the bed is slowly moved so that the part crashes into the head, gets detached and knocked off the table, then the head is lowered even further and sweeps the part away.</p>
<p>The only mechanical modification, namely a sheet of paper stuck to the table's edge, ensures that the part will roll clear of the bed rails, and pushes the pile of finished parts further from the printer once it's off.
In the case of that video there were three parts being printed at a time, so the motion was repeated for each of them, even though most of the time all three got successfully detached by the gantry.</p>
<p>This approach is likely far from universal, and probably only works with parts that are tall enough and have a small enough footprint to easily detach from the bed; I certainly wouldn't try it if the parts have really good bed adhesion and require more than a slight force to pop off. But it looks like if the requirements are satisfied it should be quite effective.</p>
<p>Also it's likely to be problematic on printers with box frames where it's the bed that moves in the Z direction, as the printed parts are likely to get trapped between the bed, print head and printer frame. CoreXY designs where the bed is static and the head moves in all three axes should be fine, however.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-27T15:53:54.953Z
2023-03-27T16:00:27.560Z
2023-03-27T16:00:27.560Z
FlashCactus
<p>I Don't really think that it is possible without hardware modifications, or maybe some small parts that will fit in the bed of the printer all on the same time</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:50:48.617Z
Dan - what type of modifications do you believe will best serve the 'automation' process?
J. Roibal - BlockchainEng
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-01T23:59:28.650Z
For example long foldable bed
Dan Boyko
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:38:15.230Z
2016-06-13T22:38:15.230Z
Dan Boyko
<p>The only thing I can think of off hand is an old mod for the early MakerBot machines. It first was released for the Thing-O'-Matic I believe, but is compatible with Replicator 1 machines (and its knock-offs). Here's the <a href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4056" rel="noreferrer">Thingiverse page</a>, but look up Automatic Build Plate.</p>

<p>Essentially, you can use the Replicator G slicing program and there is a setting for "ABP" or Automatic Build Plate. This will basically tell the ABP to run its routine after the controller receives the response that the printing program is done and roll the finished part off the edge of the build plate, then start the same program over again.</p>

<p>Drawbacks:</p>

<ul>
<li>I don't think it's easily compatible with newer machines/slicers. But, it's open source</li>
<li>Pretty sure you have to use Replicator G, which is outdated now and may make your machine sound like it's going to fall apart (I know from experience)</li>
</ul>

<p>Going off of @Pete's answer about solenoids. It reminded me that someone integrated a <a href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:872617" rel="noreferrer">solenoid "ejector"</a> (aka Boxing Glove) for their machine.</p>

<p>Update (06/08/2016):</p>

<p>Forgot to mention that if you choose to create your own "Boxing Glove" or conveyor belt, some software such as Octo-Pi and Repetier-Host allow plugins. So, you could interface with your hardware via customized code and integrate the functionality directly into the slicing application for the full closed loop operation.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-12T18:04:12.690Z
The hardware design of the ABP is open source, but the method to use it for 3D printing was patented by Makerbot after they hired on the inventor (Charles Pax) so anyone who wants to use it (or any other conveyor-based build plate) needs to check local patent laws in their country.
Ryan Carlyle
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-13T05:19:39.603Z
2016-06-09T02:20:24.617Z
2016-06-09T02:20:24.617Z
tbm0115
<p>I would like to print multiple parts continuously (non-interactively), so
I can leave the printer alone for a longer time. So after finish, parts could be moved somehow out from the printing area, so the next can start.</p>

<p>Are there any methods of achieving that with standard desktop printers without having to use multiple printers?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-30T14:48:31.377Z
You should look into something like [Creality CR-30](https://www.amazon.com/Creality-3DPrintMill-Infinite-Continuous-Upgraded/dp/B093FH5NFR/?tag=3dpa-20/). Its build plate is a conveyor belt. The prints stick normally when on the flat section near the print head, but upon reaching the roller they peel off and can drop into a collection bin. A decent filament changer can be pre-loaded with 5, 8, 12 spools of filament and set in mode of "continue with next spool" once the previous one is exhausted.
SF.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-23T18:18:00.917Z
Ultimaker once showed a video where they printed bracelets on an exhibition as give aways. They used the print head to push the finished print of of the build platform. It probably was just some custom G-Code,..
Lars Pötter
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:47:36.797Z
What portion of the process are you asking about automation, there can be many steps which require interaction, including: loading filament, selecting model to print, preparation of printing bed, removal of completed prints, and fixing when broken, maintenance, etc. And secondly, what is the purpose of automating this step? Closer to 'mass manufacturing', increased output, decreased maintenance time?
J. Roibal - BlockchainEng
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-12T22:05:41.663Z
3D printing is not a very productive production technique for mass manufacturing (if not the least productive one). Creating several moulds from one master print is an example for a process that's simpler, faster, more stable and likely cheaper process.
the third dimension
<desktop-printer><automation>
How to automate printing of multiple parts continuously?
kenorb
# How to automate printing of multiple parts continuously?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-01-12)

I would like to print multiple parts continuously (non-interactively), so
I can leave the printer alone for a longer time. So after finish, parts could be moved somehow out from the printing area, so the next can start.

Are there any methods of achieving that with standard desktop printers without having to use multiple printers?

**Tags:** desktop-printer, automation

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: 3D printing is not a very productive production technique for mass manufacturing (if not the least productive one). Creating several moulds from one master print is an example for a process that's simpler, faster, more stable and likely cheaper process.  
> **username_2**: Ultimaker once showed a video where they printed bracelets on an exhibition as give aways. They used the print head to push the finished print of of the build platform. It probably was just some custom G-Code,..  
> **username_3**: What portion of the process are you asking about automation, there can be many steps which require interaction, including: loading filament, selecting model to print, preparation of printing bed, removal of completed prints, and fixing when broken, maintenance, etc. And secondly, what is the purpose of automating this step? Closer to 'mass manufacturing', increased output, decreased maintenance time?  
> **username_1**: You should look into something like [Creality CR-30](https://www.amazon.com/Creality-3DPrintMill-Infinite-Continuous-Upgraded/dp/B093FH5NFR/?tag=3dpa-20/). Its build plate is a conveyor belt. The prints stick normally when on the flat section near the print head, but upon reaching the roller they peel off and can drop into a collection bin. A decent filament changer can be pre-loaded with 5, 8, 12 spools of filament and set in mode of "continue with next spool" once the previous one is exhausted.  

---

## 5 answers

### Answer by username_6 on 2016-01-13. Score: 13 | Accepted answer

The only thing I can think of off hand is an old mod for the early MakerBot machines. It first was released for the Thing-O'-Matic I believe, but is compatible with Replicator 1 machines (and its knock-offs). Here's the [Thingiverse page](http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4056), but look up Automatic Build Plate.

Essentially, you can use the Replicator G slicing program and there is a setting for "ABP" or Automatic Build Plate. This will basically tell the ABP to run its routine after the controller receives the response that the printing program is done and roll the finished part off the edge of the build plate, then start the same program over again.

Drawbacks:

* I don't think it's easily compatible with newer machines/slicers. But, it's open source
* Pretty sure you have to use Replicator G, which is outdated now and may make your machine sound like it's going to fall apart (I know from experience)

Going off of @username_7's answer about solenoids. It reminded me that someone integrated a [solenoid "ejector"](http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:872617) (aka Boxing Glove) for their machine.

Update (06/08/2016):

Forgot to mention that if you choose to create your own "Boxing Glove" or conveyor belt, some software such as Octo-Pi and Repetier-Host allow plugins. So, you could interface with your hardware via customized code and integrate the functionality directly into the slicing application for the full closed loop operation.

> **Comments:**
> **username_10**: The hardware design of the ABP is open source, but the method to use it for 3D printing was patented by Makerbot after they hired on the inventor (Charles Pax) so anyone who wants to use it (or any other conveyor-based build plate) needs to check local patent laws in their country.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2016-01-13. Score: 6

An option that might be feasible for some situations (depending on your setup) is **Sequential Printing** - a feature provided by some slicing software, for instance [Slic3r](http://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/sequential-printing).

In short, this allows you to print multiple objects **one at a time** rather than simultaneously. This has some obvious benefits, but also some downsides:

**Benefits:**

* Each object is finished individually, and you will therefore not have multiple half-finished prints *when* something goes wrong.
* No particular printer or bed swapping mechanic is needed.

**Downsides:**

* With most consumer printer, print area is somewhat limited, and sequential printing requires you to place objects so that the hot end can move freely between the finished objects, potentially restricting the effective usage of your print volume.
* By printing objects one at a time, you limit the natural print cooling that happens when printing multiple objects at the same time. In particular for smaller prints, you might not want to print sequentially unless your print cooling solution is up for it.
* Requires some setup

You specifically mention that you would like the finished prints to be moved outside the print area. In it self, sequential printing does not do this for you; however, if you fit your printer with a large, motorized print bed, you might achieve the same effect without moving into unfamiliar technology!

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: I like the "when something goes wrong" lol Because if you own a home 3D printer, you'll understand!  
> **username_5**: @username_6, indeed! I normally remember to use sequential printing only after failing a multi-print job!  

---

### Answer by username_7 on 2016-01-13. Score: 2

It would be possible and not too terribly difficult to rig a servo or solenoid with a push plate like a plow, on top of your build plate.

However this would require another processor via raspberry pi or arduino to control it. Scripting execution when the print has completed wouldn't be terribly difficult either, but it isn't readily available and certainly isn't part of a mass produced printer.

My issue with the concept is if you push a bunch of prints off the build plate, what guarantee do you have they wont become damaged in the process?

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: Like this? http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:872617  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2023-03-27. Score: 0

I've recently seen a video of this being done successfully with almost no hardware modifications to the printer.

Unfortunately I can't find the video itself any more, but the basic idea is to use the print head/gantry to knock the finished prints off the table, likely by adding some custom commands to the end of the sliced G-code. After the print is finished, the bed moves to the Y endstop (this was done on a bedslinger printer), the head is lowered to about half of the parts' height, then the bed is slowly moved so that the part crashes into the head, gets detached and knocked off the table, then the head is lowered even further and sweeps the part away.

The only mechanical modification, namely a sheet of paper stuck to the table's edge, ensures that the part will roll clear of the bed rails, and pushes the pile of finished parts further from the printer once it's off.
In the case of that video there were three parts being printed at a time, so the motion was repeated for each of them, even though most of the time all three got successfully detached by the gantry.

This approach is likely far from universal, and probably only works with parts that are tall enough and have a small enough footprint to easily detach from the bed; I certainly wouldn't try it if the parts have really good bed adhesion and require more than a slight force to pop off. But it looks like if the requirements are satisfied it should be quite effective.

Also it's likely to be problematic on printers with box frames where it's the bed that moves in the Z direction, as the printed parts are likely to get trapped between the bed, print head and printer frame. CoreXY designs where the bed is static and the head moves in all three axes should be fine, however.


---

### Answer by username_9 on 2016-06-13. Score: -1

I Don't really think that it is possible without hardware modifications, or maybe some small parts that will fit in the bed of the printer all on the same time

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Dan - what type of modifications do you believe will best serve the 'automation' process?  
> **username_9**: For example long foldable bed  

---

