Answers.Body: <p>While there is no standard that has been widely adopted across soundscapes, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X19305801" rel="noreferrer">this paper</a> from Zhao et al used simulated soundscapes to evaluate the performance of various soundscape metrics as measurements of a clearly-known (because it was artificial) biodiversity. To the best of my knowledge, the dataset is not widely adopted, but the protocol may represent one that could be a basis for a more widely-adopted standard or best practice moving forward.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-01T06:32:41.623Z
Answers.Text: The cited paper assumes that soundscapes are "used as proxies for bird species richness". Bur what about soundscape to describe habitat usage, anthropogenic interaction, etc.
Answers.UserDisplayName: WMXZ
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-01T01:05:23.457Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-08-01T01:05:23.457Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: dtsavage
Answers.Body: <p>There is a standard for how underwater noise is processed to be imported into the EU-wide <a href="https://www.ices.dk/data/data-portals/Pages/underwater-noise.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">database supported by ICES</a>. These standards are set by working groups comprised by experts. The idea is that anyone can download these data, available in third-octave levels, from multiple institutions and they will be processed the same. This is still a work-in-progress, though, and some countries are ahead of others.</p>
  <p>However, setting these standards is part of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.</p>
  <p>As for software, I've really only seen PAMGuide and PAMGuard offer these tools, and I'm not aware of anything that directly compares them.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-02T11:16:19.337Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-01-27T23:07:57.010Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-01-27T23:07:57.010Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: etgriffiths
Answers.Body: <p>It's a very specific example related to the question that you ask, but this note on the differences in ACI from the <code>seewave</code> and <code>soundecology</code> packages might be of interest to you:</p>
  <p><strong>Differences of ACI values between seewave and soundecology</strong><br />
  <a href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/soundecology/vignettes/ACIandSeewave.html" rel="noreferrer">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/soundecology/vignettes/ACIandSeewave.html</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-02T15:02:37.087Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-08-02T15:02:37.087Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carlos Abrahams
Answers.Body: <p>From what I have found from the ecoacoustics/soundscape literature, the metrics that work &quot;best&quot; for predicting species richness, habitat quality, disturbance, etc. all are pretty site-specific and not necessarily generalizable across ecosystems.</p>
  <p>However I have noticed some exceptions that get at standardized metrics; Sarab Sethi's work in this space may yield some insights - e.g.,</p>
  <p>&quot;Characterizing soundscapes across diverse ecosystems using a universal acoustic feature set&quot; - <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2004702117" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2004702117</a>.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-06T17:36:08.203Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-08-07T21:54:24.483Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-08-07T21:54:24.483Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carly Batist
Answers.Body: <p>You may find MANTA useful for marine soundscape analysis. See <a href="https://bitbucket.org/CLO-BRP/manta-wiki/wiki/Home" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA)</a>.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-14T22:46:58.083Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-08-15T02:34:29.037Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-08-15T02:34:29.037Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael Pitzrick
Body: <p>There are a number of software packages available for describing soundscape and differing views on which approach is 'best' (see this <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_is_the_best_software_for_marine_soundscape_analysis" rel="noreferrer">thread</a>), and there have been attempts at developing standards for soundscape analysis (<a href="https://adeon.unh.edu/sites/default/files/user-uploads/ADEON%20Soundscape%20Specification%20Deliverable%20v1.0%20FINAL%20Submission.pdf" rel="noreferrer">ADEON</a>, <a href="https://www.euronoise2018.eu/docs/papers/405_Euronoise2018.pdf" rel="noreferrer">Euronoise</a>).</p>
  <p>Have there been any attempts to create a standard dataset for testing/comparison of <strong>metrics</strong> using different software approaches to ensure that metrics are comparable? Have there been any comparisons of different metrics?</p>
  <p>My interest is specifically in marine soundscape, but I suspect the question also applies towards terrestrial soundscape.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-07-31T16:01:36.973Z
Comments.Text: Important Question. I guess, this depends also on objectives to present soundscapes. Hope you get some good answers. Looking forward to them
Comments.UserDisplayName: WMXZ
Tags: <soundscape><software><standards><comparison>
Title: Comparison of Soundscape metrics from different software?
ThreadText: # Comparison of Soundscape metrics from different software?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-07-31)
  
  There are a number of software packages available for describing soundscape and differing views on which approach is 'best' (see this [thread](https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_is_the_best_software_for_marine_soundscape_analysis)), and there have been attempts at developing standards for soundscape analysis ([ADEON](https://adeon.unh.edu/sites/default/files/user-uploads/ADEON%20Soundscape%20Specification%20Deliverable%20v1.0%20FINAL%20Submission.pdf), [Euronoise](https://www.euronoise2018.eu/docs/papers/405_Euronoise2018.pdf)).
  
  Have there been any attempts to create a standard dataset for testing/comparison of **metrics** using different software approaches to ensure that metrics are comparable? Have there been any comparisons of different metrics?
  
  My interest is specifically in marine soundscape, but I suspect the question also applies towards terrestrial soundscape.
  
  **Tags:** soundscape, software, standards, comparison
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Important Question. I guess, this depends also on objectives to present soundscapes. Hope you get some good answers. Looking forward to them  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2022-08-01. Score: 7
  
  While there is no standard that has been widely adopted across soundscapes, [this paper](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X19305801) from Zhao et al used simulated soundscapes to evaluate the performance of various soundscape metrics as measurements of a clearly-known (because it was artificial) biodiversity. To the best of my knowledge, the dataset is not widely adopted, but the protocol may represent one that could be a basis for a more widely-adopted standard or best practice moving forward.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: The cited paper assumes that soundscapes are "used as proxies for bird species richness". Bur what about soundscape to describe habitat usage, anthropogenic interaction, etc.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2022-08-02. Score: 5
  
  There is a standard for how underwater noise is processed to be imported into the EU-wide [database supported by ICES](https://www.ices.dk/data/data-portals/Pages/underwater-noise.aspx). These standards are set by working groups comprised by experts. The idea is that anyone can download these data, available in third-octave levels, from multiple institutions and they will be processed the same. This is still a work-in-progress, though, and some countries are ahead of others.
  
  However, setting these standards is part of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
  
  As for software, I've really only seen PAMGuide and PAMGuard offer these tools, and I'm not aware of anything that directly compares them.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2022-08-02. Score: 5
  
  It's a very specific example related to the question that you ask, but this note on the differences in ACI from the `seewave` and `soundecology` packages might be of interest to you:
  
  **Differences of ACI values between seewave and soundecology**  
  <https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/soundecology/vignettes/ACIandSeewave.html>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2022-08-06. Score: 2
  
  From what I have found from the ecoacoustics/soundscape literature, the metrics that work "best" for predicting species richness, habitat quality, disturbance, etc. all are pretty site-specific and not necessarily generalizable across ecosystems.
  
  However I have noticed some exceptions that get at standardized metrics; Sarab Sethi's work in this space may yield some insights - e.g.,
  
  "Characterizing soundscapes across diverse ecosystems using a universal acoustic feature set" - <https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2004702117>.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2022-08-14. Score: 1
  
  You may find MANTA useful for marine soundscape analysis. See [Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA)](https://bitbucket.org/CLO-BRP/manta-wiki/wiki/Home).
  
  
  ---
  
  