Answers: <p>For the whole points and to try things there's <a href="https://learn.chef.io" rel="noreferrer">https://learn.chef.io</a> which allow you to test automate also.</p>
  
  <p>Mainly chef automate is the next iteration bringing together 4 commercial products from Chef: chef manage (UI), chef reporting, chef compliance and delivery (CI/CD) with the addition of push jobs which was open sourced a little before.</p>
  
  <p>Inspec is another new tool for compliance, it is based on serverspec but not extending it not using its code base.</p>
  
  <p>Automate is not mandatory to author cookbooks at all, it is just a convenient way to display back status of nodes either on configuration point of view or compliance point of view (see the audit cookbook for inspec usage within a run), you can still does everything on your nodes on the free open source model, you'll have to handle the feedback loop yourself, either through a handler or any other way of your choice as it was already the case.</p>
  
  <p>The CI/CD part of Automate doesn't replace any tool, it's more another approach to CI/CD pipelines, so you may use it to do the usual linting (foodcritic/cookstyle), test (chefspec), and then upload to your chef-server for use. It can handle deploys through the push jobs feature and after review and approval of changes.</p>
  
  <p>Presentation of <a href="https://www.chef.io/automate/" rel="noreferrer">automate</a> and the related <a href="https://docs.chef.io/workflow.html" rel="noreferrer">documentation</a> (workflow is the first concept, others are accessible from the menu on the left)</p>
  
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T15:46:57.223Z
Answers: Does Automate use the same specs and lints that ServerSpec and Foodcritic? What about Kitchen? How does verifying on Automate differs from Kitchen? I've tried Delivery previously (when it was still Delivery, not Automate), and it required some executors nodes and so on to converge? cookbooks.. And thanks for the quick answer!
Answers: madhead
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T15:53:29.573Z
Answers: @tensibai Is it appropriate to say Chef Automate includes chef manage? the UI is not the same as the Chef Server management console, and seems to be it's own derivation.
Answers: Preston Martin
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T16:05:12.957Z
Answers: @Preston main goal of viz is to replace manage, that's why I said it's a new iteration of those tools
Answers: Tensibai
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T16:07:55.420Z
Answers: @madhead you can still use kitchen, automate workfllow doesn't enforce a system on the runners, automate workflow is a replacement for Jenkins mainly (quite simplified here)
Answers: Tensibai
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T16:28:03.203Z
Answers: @Tensibai, so, isn't there a duplication right now? I mean, should I support both Automate tests and Kitchen?
Answers: madhead
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T16:32:37.400Z
Answers: You don't have to support the automate method if you don't use it @madhead :)
Answers: Tensibai
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T16:57:31.647Z
Answers: @Tensibai, I understand. Let me reformulate / split the question: 1) Is it fine / normal / makes any sense to support both Automate and "classic" approach (Kitchen + ServerSpec) 2) If yes, are there any duplication or sharing the code?
Answers: madhead
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T17:42:39.740Z
Answers: No, automate part (the .delivery directory) only host the 'build steps' and not the test, it does just drives which test is run and still launch foodceitic/cookstyle/chefspec/kitchen in the various steps as far as I know
Answers: Tensibai
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2017-09-14T15:35:44.120Z
Answers: 2017-09-14T15:35:44.120Z
Answers: Tensibai
Body: <p>I've noticed that now most of the Supermarket's recipes are using Chef Delivery (aka Chef Automate). There is little information about it on their site, and it looks for me like it is a "pig in a poke": first you pay and they you know what you've paid for.</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li>Does Chef Automate require you any additional server, besides Chef Server (we already have it). I guess yes.</li>
  <li>Is it required at all to write cookbooks now?</li>
  <li>Will it replace Foodcritic, ServerSpec and Kitchen eventually? Also, I see they now offer and "InSpec" which seems to be similar to ServerSpec.</li>
  </ol>
  
Tags: <automation><chef>
Title: What is Chef Automate
UserDisplayName: madhead
ThreadText: # What is Chef Automate
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2017-09-14)
  
  I've noticed that now most of the Supermarket's recipes are using Chef Delivery (aka Chef Automate). There is little information about it on their site, and it looks for me like it is a "pig in a poke": first you pay and they you know what you've paid for.
  
  1. Does Chef Automate require you any additional server, besides Chef Server (we already have it). I guess yes.
  2. Is it required at all to write cookbooks now?
  3. Will it replace Foodcritic, ServerSpec and Kitchen eventually? Also, I see they now offer and "InSpec" which seems to be similar to ServerSpec.
  
  **Tags:** automation, chef
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2017-09-14. Score: 7 | Accepted answer
  
  For the whole points and to try things there's <https://learn.chef.io> which allow you to test automate also.
  
  Mainly chef automate is the next iteration bringing together 4 commercial products from Chef: chef manage (UI), chef reporting, chef compliance and delivery (CI/CD) with the addition of push jobs which was open sourced a little before.
  
  Inspec is another new tool for compliance, it is based on serverspec but not extending it not using its code base.
  
  Automate is not mandatory to author cookbooks at all, it is just a convenient way to display back status of nodes either on configuration point of view or compliance point of view (see the audit cookbook for inspec usage within a run), you can still does everything on your nodes on the free open source model, you'll have to handle the feedback loop yourself, either through a handler or any other way of your choice as it was already the case.
  
  The CI/CD part of Automate doesn't replace any tool, it's more another approach to CI/CD pipelines, so you may use it to do the usual linting (foodcritic/cookstyle), test (chefspec), and then upload to your chef-server for use. It can handle deploys through the push jobs feature and after review and approval of changes.
  
  Presentation of [automate](https://www.chef.io/automate/) and the related [documentation](https://docs.chef.io/workflow.html) (workflow is the first concept, others are accessible from the menu on the left)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Does Automate use the same specs and lints that ServerSpec and Foodcritic? What about Kitchen? How does verifying on Automate differs from Kitchen? I've tried Delivery previously (when it was still Delivery, not Automate), and it required some executors nodes and so on to converge? cookbooks.. And thanks for the quick answer!  
  > **username_2**: @username_1 Is it appropriate to say Chef Automate includes chef manage? the UI is not the same as the Chef Server management console, and seems to be it's own derivation.  
  > **username_1**: @username_2 main goal of viz is to replace manage, that's why I said it's a new iteration of those tools  
  > **username_1**: @username_0 you can still use kitchen, automate workfllow doesn't enforce a system on the runners, automate workflow is a replacement for Jenkins mainly (quite simplified here)  
  > **username_0**: @username_1, so, isn't there a duplication right now? I mean, should I support both Automate tests and Kitchen?  
  > **username_1**: You don't have to support the automate method if you don't use it @username_0 :)  
  > **username_0**: @username_1, I understand. Let me reformulate / split the question: 1) Is it fine / normal / makes any sense to support both Automate and "classic" approach (Kitchen + ServerSpec) 2) If yes, are there any duplication or sharing the code?  
  > **username_1**: No, automate part (the .delivery directory) only host the 'build steps' and not the test, it does just drives which test is run and still launch foodceitic/cookstyle/chefspec/kitchen in the various steps as far as I know  
  
  ---
  
  