Answers: <p>ELK is pretty ineffective as a monitoring tool in a default configuration as it doesn't do monitoring - only reporting. ELK can only provide monitoring and alerting abilities if you configure additional add-ons such as <a href="http://elastalert.readthedocs.io/en/latest/elastalert.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ElastAlert</a>.</p>
  
  <p>Then, you are impacted by your ability to log errors via syslog. If messages come in via, say, SNMP traps, you will be unable to alert on these if you do not configure the <a href="https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/plugins-inputs-snmptrap.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">appropriate plugin</a>.</p>
  
  <p>Like most monitoring systems, your effectiveness is determined mostly by 1) your input method and 2) if you have told the system to alert off of all of the correct messages.</p>
  
Answers: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers: 2018-04-16T16:22:54.533Z
Answers: 2018-04-16T16:22:54.533Z
Answers: James Shewey
Body: <p>"ELK" is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.</p>
  
  <pre><code> How effective is ELK than other Monitoring tools?
  </code></pre>
  
Comments: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments: 2018-04-13T08:23:52.417Z
Comments: This sounds like a question that can be answered by pointing to the ELK documentation.
Comments: Vish
Comments: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments: 2018-04-16T16:17:15.530Z
Comments: Related: https://devops.stackexchange.com/questions/2943/elk-micro-service-and-network-latency-monitoring/2952#2952
Comments: James Shewey
Tags: <monitoring><logstash><elastic>
Title: How effective is ELK than other Monitoring tools?
UserDisplayName: Dixon Joseph Dalmeida
ThreadText: # How effective is ELK than other Monitoring tools?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-12)
  
  "ELK" is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.
  
  ```
   How effective is ELK than other Monitoring tools?
  
  ```
  
  **Tags:** monitoring, logstash, elastic
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: This sounds like a question that can be answered by pointing to the ELK documentation.  
  > **username_2**: Related: https://devops.stackexchange.com/questions/2943/elk-micro-service-and-network-latency-monitoring/2952#2952  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2018-04-16. Score: 1 | Accepted answer
  
  ELK is pretty ineffective as a monitoring tool in a default configuration as it doesn't do monitoring - only reporting. ELK can only provide monitoring and alerting abilities if you configure additional add-ons such as [ElastAlert](http://elastalert.readthedocs.io/en/latest/elastalert.html).
  
  Then, you are impacted by your ability to log errors via syslog. If messages come in via, say, SNMP traps, you will be unable to alert on these if you do not configure the [appropriate plugin](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/plugins-inputs-snmptrap.html).
  
  Like most monitoring systems, your effectiveness is determined mostly by 1) your input method and 2) if you have told the system to alert off of all of the correct messages.
  
  
  ---
  
  