Answers.Body: <p>This is no black-and-white issue, but rather one &quot;of order&quot;. I'm speaking with personal experience of decades, myself and as a trainer. I have become a FM with essentially zero knowledge of opening theory. But people keep bitching that with it I would be GM now :-)</p>
  <p>As a trainer, I strongly recommend: Teaching your kiddies opening theory very early, especially opening traps, will bring in fast success - and block their development. Other trainers regularly hired me to play matches against their talents. I threw them out of theory and then it showed who was <em>really</em> good (i.e., plays good chess outside their comfort zone).</p>
  <p>Thus, <em>first</em> get a feeling of general opening principles and piece coordination etc., <em>then</em> see what your playing style is and which openings suit you, and only <em>then</em> memorize a concrete repertoire (good luck memorizing the <em>whole</em> of opening theory...).</p>
  <p>Note computers here as usual have been something of a game changer. Today you can simply let the computer win the game against me in your attic and then just play out the memorized moves on the board. My unpredictability is very predictable...</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-04-18T09:27:16.230Z
Answers.Text: I'd bet you did indeed know quite a bunch of opening lines even if you hadn't actively dedicated hundrds of hours to its study.
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-04-18T18:21:29.017Z
Answers.Text: @David: No, no and no (OK, I know e.g. the setup of the classic QGD) but how am I supposed to prove a lack of knowledge? :-) Would be an interesting quest to pick a few games'o'mine and check where I deviate from theory.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-04-19T09:52:57.953Z
Answers.Text: If you've ever played a game of chess, you do know some opening lines. I don't think you went to every OTB game and spent five minutes figuring out what you should do on move 2 because you didn't know any opening theory.
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-04-18T08:30:03.860Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-04-18T08:30:03.860Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.Body: <p>Both are necessary skills to play chess at a high level.</p>
  <p>Memory won't take you far if you don't actually understand what you're doing. At some point in every game your opponent will play a move you haven't studied and you'll need to be ready to react.</p>
  <p>On the other hand, if you have great skills at tactics and strategy you can become a decent chess player, but knowing opening theory would make you a better one. There's no point in trying to re-invent the wheel in every game when you can easily commit to memory the liens that occur most frequently in your games and be sure you'll get an acceptable position every time.</p>
  <p>Still, it's true that if you are a strong chess players you'll easily be able to remember the best moves in the lines you're playing all the time and opening study will become a less demanding task. Doing it the other way around is harder, as having memorized a lot of opening lines won't necessarely make you much better at understanding chess as a whole.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-04-18T07:15:13.710Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-04-18T07:15:13.710Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Body: <p><a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/41958/memorising-openings">While answering this question</a>, I started to wonder is it even better to memorize openings or to simply rely on personal instinct and improve that? As in is relying on your instinct better than memorizing a set of moves? What are the advantages and disadvantages?</p>
  
Tags: <opening><memorization>
Title: Is it better to memorize openings or to simply rely on personal intict and improve that?
ThreadText: # Is it better to memorize openings or to simply rely on personal intict and improve that?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2023-04-17)
  
  [While answering this question](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/41958/memorising-openings), I started to wonder is it even better to memorize openings or to simply rely on personal instinct and improve that? As in is relying on your instinct better than memorizing a set of moves? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
  
  **Tags:** opening, memorization
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2023-04-18. Score: 1 | Accepted answer
  
  This is no black-and-white issue, but rather one "of order". I'm speaking with personal experience of decades, myself and as a trainer. I have become a FM with essentially zero knowledge of opening theory. But people keep bitching that with it I would be GM now :-)
  
  As a trainer, I strongly recommend: Teaching your kiddies opening theory very early, especially opening traps, will bring in fast success - and block their development. Other trainers regularly hired me to play matches against their talents. I threw them out of theory and then it showed who was *really* good (i.e., plays good chess outside their comfort zone).
  
  Thus, *first* get a feeling of general opening principles and piece coordination etc., *then* see what your playing style is and which openings suit you, and only *then* memorize a concrete repertoire (good luck memorizing the *whole* of opening theory...).
  
  Note computers here as usual have been something of a game changer. Today you can simply let the computer win the game against me in your attic and then just play out the memorized moves on the board. My unpredictability is very predictable...
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: I'd bet you did indeed know quite a bunch of opening lines even if you hadn't actively dedicated hundrds of hours to its study.  
  > **username_1**: @username_2: No, no and no (OK, I know e.g. the setup of the classic QGD) but how am I supposed to prove a lack of knowledge? :-) Would be an interesting quest to pick a few games'o'mine and check where I deviate from theory.  
  > **username_2**: If you've ever played a game of chess, you do know some opening lines. I don't think you went to every OTB game and spent five minutes figuring out what you should do on move 2 because you didn't know any opening theory.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2023-04-18. Score: 1
  
  Both are necessary skills to play chess at a high level.
  
  Memory won't take you far if you don't actually understand what you're doing. At some point in every game your opponent will play a move you haven't studied and you'll need to be ready to react.
  
  On the other hand, if you have great skills at tactics and strategy you can become a decent chess player, but knowing opening theory would make you a better one. There's no point in trying to re-invent the wheel in every game when you can easily commit to memory the liens that occur most frequently in your games and be sure you'll get an acceptable position every time.
  
  Still, it's true that if you are a strong chess players you'll easily be able to remember the best moves in the lines you're playing all the time and opening study will become a less demanding task. Doing it the other way around is harder, as having memorized a lot of opening lines won't necessarely make you much better at understanding chess as a whole.
  
  
  ---
  
  