Answers.Body: <p>This is only a partial answer to your first question. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_and_Black_in_chess" rel="nofollow noreferrer">It was common practice, but not a rule, by 1862</a>. It appears that the first time this was made a rule in a major tournament was the year 1880.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-03-29T20:46:43.433Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-03-29T20:46:43.433Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Starship
Answers.Body: <p>Partial answer:</p>
  <p>In Staunton's <a href="https://books.google.fr/books?id=Zu0IAAAAQAAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Chessplayer Handbook</a>, published in 1847, the rules section (Chapter V, The Laws of the Game, starting p35) describes many nuances, even about odds games or the consequences of failing to say &quot;check&quot;, but omits to say which side should play first.</p>
  <p>However, all the games are presented with White playing first. This seems like a form of evidence for Staunton, who writes at the beginning of the first example (chapter IX, p51-52):</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>In this game, as in all the analyses that follow, the reader will be supposed to play the White Pieces and to have the first move, although, as it has been before remarked, it is advisable for you to accustom yourself to play with either Black or White (...).</p>
  </blockquote>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-03-30T12:17:01.763Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-03-31T09:45:33.913Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-03-31T09:45:33.913Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Body: <p>By <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPT_symmetry" rel="noreferrer">CPT</a> (or better: the Chess version thereof) if a game is opened by Black, you can transpose it to the standard version (by swapping board, colors and move rights) and there is no visible difference. I somewhere read that the Immortal indeed was played this way. I <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-does-white-always-go-first-in-chess-141962" rel="noreferrer">googled a bit</a>, it seems that the convention that White begins was first proposed by master <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_L%C3%B6wenthal" rel="noreferrer">Löwenthal</a>, i.e. is not <em>that</em> old at all!</p>
  <p>Can a historian help out about a) when &quot;White moves first&quot; was canonized worldwide (pre-1st version of FIDE rules?) and b) if the Immortal indeed was played with Black moving first?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-12-20T17:31:29.410Z
Comments.Text: Very interesting rabbit hole to investigate.  Thank you for this.What is proof that the immortal was played with Black first?  I have seen reporting from that time that shows black moving first, is that sufficient?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-12-21T08:36:05.253Z
Comments.Text: @MichaelWest: The proof is my computer-like memory :-) I even so much leaned out of the window to assert it matter-of-factly when I wrote a mini-article on CPT in chess and physics. Ergo, someone wrote it somewhere in the gazillion chess books I read and had so much reputation I trusted it point blank. I estimate it was about 30 years ago, so politics (see the linked article) were a non-issue in this matter then.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-12-21T11:17:18.337Z
Comments.Text: The sobriquet "Immortal" refers to [a game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortal_Game) Anderssen-Kieseritzky, played on 21 June 1851 in London, during a break of the first international tournament. [Wiki] [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_and_Black_in_chess#History) also states that Anderssen played with the black pieces.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Rosie F
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-12-22T16:27:15.287Z
Comments.Text: @RosieF: Ah, this factually answers my specific question, the book I read probably was aware of the Kling/Horwitz book. Didn't know that Wiki link existed. You live, you learn.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-05-21T00:32:35.977Z
Comments.Text: A bit of digging shows that in the US it was in the 5th American Chess Congress of 1880 when the rule was first inscribed in the Code of Chess Laws (https://theconversation.com/why-does-white-always-go-first-in-chess-141962).
Comments.UserDisplayName: Pablo S. Ocal
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2023-02-28T16:44:00.343Z
Comments.Text: I have doubts. In a great book of Nunn with the 100 greatest games of all time , nothing in this direction is mentioned.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Peter
Tags: <rules><history><famous-games>
Title: Black beginning (specifically, the Immortal)
ThreadText: # Black beginning (specifically, the Immortal)
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-12-20)
  
  By [CPT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPT_symmetry) (or better: the Chess version thereof) if a game is opened by Black, you can transpose it to the standard version (by swapping board, colors and move rights) and there is no visible difference. I somewhere read that the Immortal indeed was played this way. I [googled a bit](https://theconversation.com/why-does-white-always-go-first-in-chess-141962), it seems that the convention that White begins was first proposed by master [Löwenthal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_L%C3%B6wenthal), i.e. is not *that* old at all!
  
  Can a historian help out about a) when "White moves first" was canonized worldwide (pre-1st version of FIDE rules?) and b) if the Immortal indeed was played with Black moving first?
  
  **Tags:** rules, history, famous-games
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Very interesting rabbit hole to investigate.  Thank you for this.What is proof that the immortal was played with Black first?  I have seen reporting from that time that shows black moving first, is that sufficient?  
  > **username_0**: @username_1: The proof is my computer-like memory :-) I even so much leaned out of the window to assert it matter-of-factly when I wrote a mini-article on CPT in chess and physics. Ergo, someone wrote it somewhere in the gazillion chess books I read and had so much reputation I trusted it point blank. I estimate it was about 30 years ago, so politics (see the linked article) were a non-issue in this matter then.  
  > **username_2**: The sobriquet "Immortal" refers to [a game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortal_Game) Anderssen-Kieseritzky, played on 21 June 1851 in London, during a break of the first international tournament. [Wiki] [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_and_Black_in_chess#History) also states that Anderssen played with the black pieces.  
  > **username_0**: @username_2: Ah, this factually answers my specific question, the book I read probably was aware of the Kling/Horwitz book. Didn't know that Wiki link existed. You live, you learn.  
  > **username_3**: A bit of digging shows that in the US it was in the 5th American Chess Congress of 1880 when the rule was first inscribed in the Code of Chess Laws (https://theconversation.com/why-does-white-always-go-first-in-chess-141962).  
  > **username_4**: I have doubts. In a great book of Nunn with the 100 greatest games of all time , nothing in this direction is mentioned.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2023-03-29. Score: 2
  
  This is only a partial answer to your first question. [It was common practice, but not a rule, by 1862](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_and_Black_in_chess). It appears that the first time this was made a rule in a major tournament was the year 1880.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2023-03-30. Score: 2
  
  Partial answer:
  
  In Staunton's [Chessplayer Handbook](https://books.google.fr/books?id=Zu0IAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false), published in 1847, the rules section (Chapter V, The Laws of the Game, starting p35) describes many nuances, even about odds games or the consequences of failing to say "check", but omits to say which side should play first.
  
  However, all the games are presented with White playing first. This seems like a form of evidence for Staunton, who writes at the beginning of the first example (chapter IX, p51-52):
  
  > In this game, as in all the analyses that follow, the reader will be supposed to play the White Pieces and to have the first move, although, as it has been before remarked, it is advisable for you to accustom yourself to play with either Black or White (...).
  
  
  ---
  
  