Answers.Body: <p>To answer this question, it is necessary to touch a few theoretical points. I will try to be brief.</p>
  <p>The first distinction that it is important to make is between a <em>drawish</em> position and an <em>equal</em> position. The first refers to positions in which no side can really strive to win and the result is most probably a draw. The second refers to positions in which both sides have equal chances of winning. So yes, there are <em>equal</em> positions that are not drawish, and this already hints an answer to your question.</p>
  <p>For a profesional player it is easy to reach both drawish or equal positions right of the opening. Depending on the player's spirit, as well as the tournament strategy he is using, whether he'll go for one or the other.</p>
  <p>To go for <em>equal</em> positions instead of <em>drawish</em> positions, you need positions with <em>imbalances</em>. An <em>imbalance</em> is some strategical, positional or material factor that alters the equilibrium of the game in one way or another. They do not necessarily mean &quot;disadvantage&quot; or &quot;advantage&quot;: an imbalance simply means each player has different things to play with.</p>
  <p>For example, this is a balanced, drawish position:</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/394Fu.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/394Fu.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
  <p>The position is typical of the exchange variation of the French Defense. It is balanced because there is equal material, same pawn structure on both sides, same king safety, same central control, same development, same everything. Boring!</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/qn7I0.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/qn7I0.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
  <p>This is an imbalanced position. White claims greater space on the queenside (and therefore prospects of queenside play) and more space in the center, while Black can claim a potential attack on the White king and eventually more space on the kingside.</p>
  <p>Both positions are <em>equal</em>. However, they aren't both balanced.</p>
  <p>To finish, the way a GM can try to avoid drawish positions is to create imbalances. Some openings are more balanced than others. The exchange french is balanced and extremely drawish (and boring), while the Winawer french or the KID are imbalanced positions.</p>
  <p>Due to the extreme ability of GMs, they more often than not reach draws even in imbalanced games. This is because both players know how to exploit their different advantages and defend their different weaknesses. However, the fact that they reach draws do not mean the games are <em>drawish</em>. If there are imbalances, there are winning chances. It's just that they are, more often than not, too good to lose.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-03-07T01:15:59.497Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-03-07T01:15:59.497Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: lafinur
Body: <p>I'm an amateur, so I don't have too much knowledge of contemporary opening theory, especially now that engine analysis allows frequent innovation.</p>
  <p>But I would like to ask the following:</p>
  <p>If two super-GMs are playing in a slow game, and the one with the black pieces intends to reach a boring, drawish position as far as possible -- let's say, because a draw is enough for the one with black to advance to the next stage of the tournament -- can white really force black to enter less drawish and less boring openings?</p>
  <p>If you can illustrate your answer with one example, I'd be grateful!</p>
  <p>I've added the tag &quot;psychology&quot; because I imagine psychology has a lot to do with the question.</p>
  
Tags: <opening><theory><psychology>
Title: How do super-GMs, with the white pieces, avoid drawish positions?
ThreadText: # How do super-GMs, with the white pieces, avoid drawish positions?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-03-06)
  
  I'm an amateur, so I don't have too much knowledge of contemporary opening theory, especially now that engine analysis allows frequent innovation.
  
  But I would like to ask the following:
  
  If two super-GMs are playing in a slow game, and the one with the black pieces intends to reach a boring, drawish position as far as possible -- let's say, because a draw is enough for the one with black to advance to the next stage of the tournament -- can white really force black to enter less drawish and less boring openings?
  
  If you can illustrate your answer with one example, I'd be grateful!
  
  I've added the tag "psychology" because I imagine psychology has a lot to do with the question.
  
  **Tags:** opening, theory, psychology
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-03-07. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  To answer this question, it is necessary to touch a few theoretical points. I will try to be brief.
  
  The first distinction that it is important to make is between a *drawish* position and an *equal* position. The first refers to positions in which no side can really strive to win and the result is most probably a draw. The second refers to positions in which both sides have equal chances of winning. So yes, there are *equal* positions that are not drawish, and this already hints an answer to your question.
  
  For a profesional player it is easy to reach both drawish or equal positions right of the opening. Depending on the player's spirit, as well as the tournament strategy he is using, whether he'll go for one or the other.
  
  To go for *equal* positions instead of *drawish* positions, you need positions with *imbalances*. An *imbalance* is some strategical, positional or material factor that alters the equilibrium of the game in one way or another. They do not necessarily mean "disadvantage" or "advantage": an imbalance simply means each player has different things to play with.
  
  For example, this is a balanced, drawish position:
  
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/394Fu.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/394Fu.png)
  
  The position is typical of the exchange variation of the French Defense. It is balanced because there is equal material, same pawn structure on both sides, same king safety, same central control, same development, same everything. Boring!
  
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/qn7I0.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/qn7I0.png)
  
  This is an imbalanced position. White claims greater space on the queenside (and therefore prospects of queenside play) and more space in the center, while Black can claim a potential attack on the White king and eventually more space on the kingside.
  
  Both positions are *equal*. However, they aren't both balanced.
  
  To finish, the way a GM can try to avoid drawish positions is to create imbalances. Some openings are more balanced than others. The exchange french is balanced and extremely drawish (and boring), while the Winawer french or the KID are imbalanced positions.
  
  Due to the extreme ability of GMs, they more often than not reach draws even in imbalanced games. This is because both players know how to exploit their different advantages and defend their different weaknesses. However, the fact that they reach draws do not mean the games are *drawish*. If there are imbalances, there are winning chances. It's just that they are, more often than not, too good to lose.
  
  
  ---
  
  