Answers.Body: <blockquote>
  <p>Are the other players allowed to discuss how to achieve this collective goal? For example can they suggest openings to whoever is playing Nepomniatchi</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>While the games are in progress this is strictly forbidden. In between games this is perfectly acceptable. What would not be acceptable would be to pre-arrange quick draws amongst themselves to conserve energy for their fights with Nepo. This would be match fixing. This happened in Soviet times when the Soviets dominated world chess.</p>
  <p>The <a href="https://handbook.fide.com/files/handbook/EthicsAndDisciplinaryCode2022.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">FIDE 2022 Ethics and Disciplinary Code</a> defines the offence of cheating as:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>e) <strong>Cheating</strong>: Any player, or any person assisting a player, who deliberately -<br />
  (i) Uses or attempts to use electronic devices or other sources of information or advice during a game;<br />
  (ii) <strong>Commits a manipulation of a chess competition such as</strong>, including but not limited to, <strong>result manipulation</strong>, sandbagging, <strong>match fixing</strong>, rating fraud, false identity, falsification or alteration of birth certificates, and deliberate participation in fictitious tournaments and games or any other false information with the purpose of obtaining an unfair advantage for a player or a team.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-07-01T00:35:12.050Z
Answers.Text: Is there anywhere these rules (regarding discussions/collusion between the games) are rigorously defined or spelt out 'on paper'?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mobeus Zoom
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-07-01T05:29:16.790Z
Answers.Text: Even if some of the others colluded, with the common aim to prevent Nepo winning, would quick draws among themselves be the best way to seek to achieve this aim? That would seem to lessen the expected target point-total for Nepo to beat. Wouldn't a better aim be to try to promote one particular player? What rules are there to outlaw this?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rosie F
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-08-23T02:25:46.180Z
Answers.Text: @MobeusZoom The Ethics and Disciplinary Code says: "Fixing or contriving in any way, or otherwise improperly influencing, or being a party to fix or contrive in any way or otherwise improperly influence, the result, progress, outcome, conduct or any other aspect of an Event or Competition;" is a violation.
Answers.UserDisplayName: D M
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-30T16:44:31.720Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-08-23T11:55:15.960Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-08-23T11:55:15.960Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Body: <p>As I write this question, Ian Nepomniachtchi is leading the ongoing Candidates tournament by a substantial margin. Since it's a winner-takes-all tournament, everyone else needs Nepomniachtchi to lose.</p>
  <p>Are the other players allowed to discuss how to achieve this collective goal? For example can they suggest openings to whoever is playing Nepomniachtchi, or discuss whether one should take risks and possibly lose in return for a chance at winning (as Rapport did in his game against Nepomniachtchi )?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-06-30T16:57:49.547Z
Comments.Text: Is it really winner-takes-all tournament? https://lichess.org/blog/YrzaZBIAACAAqAlz/candidates-day-ten-maybe-second-place-isnt-so-bad.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Akavall
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-07-01T06:25:12.507Z
Comments.Text: @Akavall that's only if Carlsen doesn't defend his title. If he doesn't play, he'd be the first active world number 1 who's not interested in being world champion. (Kasparov and Fischer were both inactive when they quit.)
Comments.UserDisplayName: Allure
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-07-01T11:44:11.533Z
Comments.Text: There is prize money too (https://www.chess.com/article/view/fide-candidates-chess-tournament-2022#prizes) so it's not stricly winner-takes-all.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2023-01-27T19:56:50.970Z
Comments.Text: @Allure winner-takes-all --> guess this didn't age well?
Comments.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2023-01-27T23:26:59.487Z
Comments.Text: @BCLC yeah, I wonder if other players like Nakamura are regretting not trying harder too.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Allure
Tags: <rules><tournament><candidates>
Title: At the Candidates, are players allowed to discuss the tournament situation with each other?
ThreadText: # At the Candidates, are players allowed to discuss the tournament situation with each other?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-06-30)
  
  As I write this question, Ian Nepomniachtchi is leading the ongoing Candidates tournament by a substantial margin. Since it's a winner-takes-all tournament, everyone else needs Nepomniachtchi to lose.
  
  Are the other players allowed to discuss how to achieve this collective goal? For example can they suggest openings to whoever is playing Nepomniachtchi, or discuss whether one should take risks and possibly lose in return for a chance at winning (as Rapport did in his game against Nepomniachtchi )?
  
  **Tags:** rules, tournament, candidates
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Is it really winner-takes-all tournament? https://lichess.org/blog/YrzaZBIAACAAqAlz/candidates-day-ten-maybe-second-place-isnt-so-bad.  
  > **username_0**: @username_1 that's only if Carlsen doesn't defend his title. If he doesn't play, he'd be the first active world number 1 who's not interested in being world champion. (Kasparov and Fischer were both inactive when they quit.)  
  > **username_2**: There is prize money too (https://www.chess.com/article/view/fide-candidates-chess-tournament-2022#prizes) so it's not stricly winner-takes-all.  
  > **username_3**: @username_0 winner-takes-all --> guess this didn't age well?  
  > **username_0**: @username_3 yeah, I wonder if other players like Nakamura are regretting not trying harder too.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2022-06-30. Score: 12 | Accepted answer
  
  > Are the other players allowed to discuss how to achieve this collective goal? For example can they suggest openings to whoever is playing Nepomniatchi
  
  While the games are in progress this is strictly forbidden. In between games this is perfectly acceptable. What would not be acceptable would be to pre-arrange quick draws amongst themselves to conserve energy for their fights with Nepo. This would be match fixing. This happened in Soviet times when the Soviets dominated world chess.
  
  The [FIDE 2022 Ethics and Disciplinary Code](https://handbook.fide.com/files/handbook/EthicsAndDisciplinaryCode2022.pdf) defines the offence of cheating as:
  
  > e) **Cheating**: Any player, or any person assisting a player, who deliberately -  
  > (i) Uses or attempts to use electronic devices or other sources of information or advice during a game;  
  > (ii) **Commits a manipulation of a chess competition such as**, including but not limited to, **result manipulation**, sandbagging, **match fixing**, rating fraud, false identity, falsification or alteration of birth certificates, and deliberate participation in fictitious tournaments and games or any other false information with the purpose of obtaining an unfair advantage for a player or a team.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_5**: Is there anywhere these rules (regarding discussions/collusion between the games) are rigorously defined or spelt out 'on paper'?  
  > **username_6**: Even if some of the others colluded, with the common aim to prevent Nepo winning, would quick draws among themselves be the best way to seek to achieve this aim? That would seem to lessen the expected target point-total for Nepo to beat. Wouldn't a better aim be to try to promote one particular player? What rules are there to outlaw this?  
  > **username_7**: @username_5 The Ethics and Disciplinary Code says: "Fixing or contriving in any way, or otherwise improperly influencing, or being a party to fix or contrive in any way or otherwise improperly influence, the result, progress, outcome, conduct or any other aspect of an Event or Competition;" is a violation.  
  
  ---
  
  