Answers.Body: <p>Objectively speaking, you're probably right: 7.Qd2 seems fine and after 7....Ng4 white can still hope for an advantage after 8.Bg5 Nc6 9.Nb3.</p>
  
  <p>However, after 7.Qd2 Nc6, black does threaten Ng4. So, white should play 8.f3 anyway, also because it is part of his plan. As a result, we transposed to the main line of 7.f3.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, white doesn't gain anything by playing 7.Qd2 first. Actually, it only gives black an extra option: 7....Ng4.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-20T18:10:26.810Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-10-20T18:34:22.310Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-10-20T18:34:22.310Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Maxwell86
Answers.Body: <p>F3 prepares g4 and h4, starting a pawn storm on the black king. It also prevents Ng4 by black, harassing white's dark squared bishop.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-20T13:22:14.000Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-10-20T13:22:14.000Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jimmy360
Body: <p>I'm a mid-level player just starting to systematically study openings, and I'm wondering why it is that after the signature Yugoslav initiation 6. Be3 by White, and the certain follow-up 6. ... Bg7, it seems that virtually all masters (~95% according to lichess) opt to play 7. f3.</p>
  
  <p>Specifically, I've been reading John Emms' <em>Starting Out</em> series on the Sicilian, and the only mention he gives of this move is that it prevents an "annoying Ng4." Why is it all that annoying? For example, let's say I play 7. Qd2 first, then Ng4 by Black, chasing the bishop to g5 for fear of exchange, with h6 by Black forcing Bh4:</p>
  
  <pre><code>rnbqk2r/pp2ppb1/3p2pp/8/3NP1nB/2N5/PPPQ1PPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - 1 9
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Sure, the bishop has had some cardio in the opening, and it no longer looks like the typical Yugoslav exchange of Dragon bishops is going to happen, but it at least looks playable. Stockfish 25ply rates it at +0.3. This is equivalent to how it rates the orthodox Yugoslav tabiya:</p>
  
  <pre><code>r2q1rk1/pp1bppbp/2np1np1/8/2BNP3/2N1BP2/PPPQ2PP/2KR3R b - - 6 10
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>What am I missing?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-10-20T10:55:22.457Z
Comments.Text: Playable doesn't always mean preferable. For example after 1 d4 e6, most people will go 2 c4, while 2 e4 is of course playable. Here f3 not only stops Ng4, it helps white's plan to go g4 as well.
Comments.UserDisplayName: jf328
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-10-21T07:54:16.817Z
Comments.Text: You might want to also compare this against 150 attack in Pirc where white doesn't put up f3. The reason there is that white's N hasn't moved from g1 yet.
Comments.UserDisplayName: jf328
Tags: <opening><sicilian-defense><statistics><1.e4>
Title: Why is 7. f3 so ubiquitous in the Yugoslav Sicilian?
ThreadText: # Why is 7. f3 so ubiquitous in the Yugoslav Sicilian?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-10-20)
  
  I'm a mid-level player just starting to systematically study openings, and I'm wondering why it is that after the signature Yugoslav initiation 6. Be3 by White, and the certain follow-up 6. ... Bg7, it seems that virtually all masters (~95% according to lichess) opt to play 7. f3.
  
  Specifically, I've been reading John Emms' *Starting Out* series on the Sicilian, and the only mention he gives of this move is that it prevents an "annoying Ng4." Why is it all that annoying? For example, let's say I play 7. Qd2 first, then Ng4 by Black, chasing the bishop to g5 for fear of exchange, with h6 by Black forcing Bh4:
  
  ```
  rnbqk2r/pp2ppb1/3p2pp/8/3NP1nB/2N5/PPPQ1PPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - 1 9
  
  ```
  
  Sure, the bishop has had some cardio in the opening, and it no longer looks like the typical Yugoslav exchange of Dragon bishops is going to happen, but it at least looks playable. Stockfish 25ply rates it at +0.3. This is equivalent to how it rates the orthodox Yugoslav tabiya:
  
  ```
  r2q1rk1/pp1bppbp/2np1np1/8/2BNP3/2N1BP2/PPPQ2PP/2KR3R b - - 6 10
  
  ```
  
  What am I missing?
  
  **Tags:** opening, sicilian-defense, statistics, 1.e4
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Playable doesn't always mean preferable. For example after 1 d4 e6, most people will go 2 c4, while 2 e4 is of course playable. Here f3 not only stops Ng4, it helps white's plan to go g4 as well.  
  > **username_1**: You might want to also compare this against 150 attack in Pirc where white doesn't put up f3. The reason there is that white's N hasn't moved from g1 yet.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2016-10-20. Score: 5 | Accepted answer
  
  Objectively speaking, you're probably right: 7.Qd2 seems fine and after 7....Ng4 white can still hope for an advantage after 8.Bg5 Nc6 9.Nb3.
  
  However, after 7.Qd2 Nc6, black does threaten Ng4. So, white should play 8.f3 anyway, also because it is part of his plan. As a result, we transposed to the main line of 7.f3.
  
  Therefore, white doesn't gain anything by playing 7.Qd2 first. Actually, it only gives black an extra option: 7....Ng4.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2016-10-20. Score: 1
  
  F3 prepares g4 and h4, starting a pawn storm on the black king. It also prevents Ng4 by black, harassing white's dark squared bishop.
  
  
  ---
  
  