Answers.Body: <p>After the exchange of white squared bishops black will play e6 cementing the center, leaving all his pawns on white squares. The white squared bishop is Black's bad piece in these structures and conversely it is white's best piece. The exchange very much favours black.</p>
  
  <p>With black pawns on d5 and f5 white isn't going to be opening the center any time soon so the black king is safe in the center. Black has at least equalised.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-20T21:02:24.093Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-21T00:40:53.203Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-21T00:40:53.203Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Answers.Body: <p>First, it is just one way to play it. It is not really better or worse than other plans at this juncture.</p>
  
  <p>Really, the big problem is that I am not a fan of 7...g6 since what is the Bf8 really going to do on g7? It is biting on granite, and is better placed on e7 defending the k-side, and eyeing the white q-side, or even Bd6 eyeing a trade for the active Bf4. Bf4 is technically a bad bishop, but it is already outside the pawn chain, and active, so it is OK to trade it off. </p>
  
  <p>The Bg7 would gain activity if you could ever get in e5, but I do not see that happening. After just a few more normal developing moves (Bg7; Nf3) this already scores at about 70% for white in the Mega 2019 database, so even practically speaking, g6 and Bg7 is not a plan I would want to defend with.</p>
  
  <p>Brian is right, and I have mentioned this before, about trading off a bishop when you can place all the remaining pawns on the opposite color of the traded bishop. If you trade off the light-squared bishop, being able to place all the pawns on the light squares keeps control of them is one favorable aspect of the position. I disagree with him to the extent that this "very much favors black", otherwise we would see this a lot more often.</p>
  
  <p>It is just one plan that, in reality, has pluses and minuses like most plans. This is very common in the slav lines where black plays Bg4xNf3 with the pawns on c6-d5-e6. It unbalances the position, so if you need a win, this is one thing to consider as a plus; but you have to keep in mind that you did cede the bishop pair, so you have to be incredibly careful about allowing the position to open up later. In practice, the side with the bishop pair almost always is able to open the position eventually, often in the endgame, so you have to make thing happen, or keep everything under tight control to prevent that. Often it is ideal to try and trade the other bishop for its equal counterpart, at least destroying the opponent's bishop pair.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T11:06:17.613Z
Answers.Text: Thanks, PhishMaster for answering. What about Black’s king safety? I am concerned about this because neither castle looks safe enough whereas remaining on the center might eventually bad for Black when White manages to open the e-file.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Maths64
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T12:05:49.550Z
Answers.Text: Hi Maths64, could you please be more specific? Do you mean the king safety if black just plays e6, Be7, and 0-0?
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T12:57:30.453Z
Answers.Text: No, I mean if White exchanges on f5. I  Ok, after e6, and with a pawn in f5, a rupture with e4 will be difficult. But still, if White castles queenside, and properly prepares f3 to play e4, the position will get open and Black king might be in trouble.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Maths64
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T13:46:15.843Z
Answers.Text: OK, in reality, the problem is that in most positions, a kingside attack is very difficult without the light-squared bishop (start paying attention to this as you read over games with kingside attacks, and you will see just how hard it is, although not impossible), so that it was already traded, despite the weakening, that factor is mitigated. Also, black can often play Kh8 and Rg8, and it is actually he, who has the kingside attacking chances.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-20T22:50:14.940Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-21T12:07:48.830Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-21T12:07:48.830Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>The engine has three moves at .8 and a fourth at .9. It isn't saying Bf5 is good. it's saying that it doesn't see that Bf5 is better or worse than the alternatives. The depth is pretty low though so I would give it some time to sort those four moves out. </p>
  
  <p>That being said, while Bf5 does double black's pawns it also trades off black's bad bishop and gives black complete control of e4. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T07:22:35.463Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-21T07:22:35.463Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Savage47
Body: <p>I would like to know why playing Bf5, allowing White to exchange the white-squared bishops, doubling Black's pawns is good for Black.</p>
  
  <p>In such situation, castling on either side seems quite unsafe for Black given its weaknesses of b6, h6 and probably f6 later on.</p>
  
  <p>Plus, I am not sure eliminating the White bishop is a good reason, as it is not particularly dangerous in such a position.</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/SEw7M.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/SEw7M.jpg" alt="l"></a></p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-12-20T19:39:41.657Z
Comments.Text: Depth 15 is far away from giving you the best move. Don't trust engine suggestions at such a low depth. :)
Comments.UserDisplayName: fuxia
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-12-21T02:45:01.233Z
Comments.Text: @ fuxia Yes, it's best to wait until at least depth 25 to start trusting the engine.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Tags: <analysis><exchange>
Title: Why is Bf5 good in this position?
ThreadText: # Why is Bf5 good in this position?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-12-20)
  
  I would like to know why playing Bf5, allowing White to exchange the white-squared bishops, doubling Black's pawns is good for Black.
  
  In such situation, castling on either side seems quite unsafe for Black given its weaknesses of b6, h6 and probably f6 later on.
  
  Plus, I am not sure eliminating the White bishop is a good reason, as it is not particularly dangerous in such a position.
  
  [![l](https://i.sstatic.net/SEw7M.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/SEw7M.jpg)
  
  **Tags:** analysis, exchange
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Depth 15 is far away from giving you the best move. Don't trust engine suggestions at such a low depth. :)  
  > **username_2**: @ username_1 Yes, it's best to wait until at least depth 25 to start trusting the engine.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-12-20. Score: 6
  
  After the exchange of white squared bishops black will play e6 cementing the center, leaving all his pawns on white squares. The white squared bishop is Black's bad piece in these structures and conversely it is white's best piece. The exchange very much favours black.
  
  With black pawns on d5 and f5 white isn't going to be opening the center any time soon so the black king is safe in the center. Black has at least equalised.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-12-20. Score: 5
  
  First, it is just one way to play it. It is not really better or worse than other plans at this juncture.
  
  Really, the big problem is that I am not a fan of 7...g6 since what is the Bf8 really going to do on g7? It is biting on granite, and is better placed on e7 defending the k-side, and eyeing the white q-side, or even Bd6 eyeing a trade for the active Bf4. Bf4 is technically a bad bishop, but it is already outside the pawn chain, and active, so it is OK to trade it off.
  
  The Bg7 would gain activity if you could ever get in e5, but I do not see that happening. After just a few more normal developing moves (Bg7; Nf3) this already scores at about 70% for white in the Mega 2019 database, so even practically speaking, g6 and Bg7 is not a plan I would want to defend with.
  
  username_3 is right, and I have mentioned this before, about trading off a bishop when you can place all the remaining pawns on the opposite color of the traded bishop. If you trade off the light-squared bishop, being able to place all the pawns on the light squares keeps control of them is one favorable aspect of the position. I disagree with him to the extent that this "very much favors black", otherwise we would see this a lot more often.
  
  It is just one plan that, in reality, has pluses and minuses like most plans. This is very common in the slav lines where black plays Bg4xNf3 with the pawns on c6-d5-e6. It unbalances the position, so if you need a win, this is one thing to consider as a plus; but you have to keep in mind that you did cede the bishop pair, so you have to be incredibly careful about allowing the position to open up later. In practice, the side with the bishop pair almost always is able to open the position eventually, often in the endgame, so you have to make thing happen, or keep everything under tight control to prevent that. Often it is ideal to try and trade the other bishop for its equal counterpart, at least destroying the opponent's bishop pair.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thanks, username_4 for answering. What about Black’s king safety? I am concerned about this because neither castle looks safe enough whereas remaining on the center might eventually bad for Black when White manages to open the e-file.  
  > **username_4**: Hi username_0, could you please be more specific? Do you mean the king safety if black just plays e6, Be7, and 0-0?  
  > **username_0**: No, I mean if White exchanges on f5. I  Ok, after e6, and with a pawn in f5, a rupture with e4 will be difficult. But still, if White castles queenside, and properly prepares f3 to play e4, the position will get open and Black king might be in trouble.  
  > **username_4**: OK, in reality, the problem is that in most positions, a kingside attack is very difficult without the light-squared bishop (start paying attention to this as you read over games with kingside attacks, and you will see just how hard it is, although not impossible), so that it was already traded, despite the weakening, that factor is mitigated. Also, black can often play Kh8 and Rg8, and it is actually he, who has the kingside attacking chances.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-12-21. Score: 0
  
  The engine has three moves at .8 and a fourth at .9. It isn't saying Bf5 is good. it's saying that it doesn't see that Bf5 is better or worse than the alternatives. The depth is pretty low though so I would give it some time to sort those four moves out.
  
  That being said, while Bf5 does double black's pawns it also trades off black's bad bishop and gives black complete control of e4.
  
  
  ---
  
  