Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>1) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its
    natural square.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>It's not too bad, the knight is a dynamic piece and sooner or later it will be moved.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>2) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the
    same team or of the opponents.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Maybe the main strategy in the opening and middle game after fianchetto is try to not block the diagonal by self pawn and opening the center. A common method is let the opponent make his center by pawns and after that you attack to the center by f or c pawns, in this situation the fianchettoed bishop is useful.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>3) Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the
    pawn structure.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Yes. <em>“Pawns cannot move backwards”</em> you made your decision to fianchetto and you should pay something. After advancing b or g pawns, neighbor squares in third row are like holes. Try to keep the fianchetto bishop to stop opponent put his pieces in the holes.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>4) If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for
    e.g. to b5, then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape
    route for the other bishop ...</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Yes again. After fianchetto a bishop, another bishop can not used to pin the same side knight. Because after attacking to the bishop by pawns a or h, the bishop should give a tempo and comes back or exchanges by opponent knight which is not desired sometimes.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>5) The fianchettoed bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is
    vulnerable to attack from the sides...</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>The main defender is the king. Not to worry about that since you have options to defend your position. Anyway it's chess and everything depends on the exact calculation not broad pieces of advice.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-23T07:14:49.713Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-08-19T16:22:49.390Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2015-08-19T16:22:49.390Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: masoud
Answers.Body: <p>Such bishops attack the center and the opponent's knight pawn and rook.  If the financhetto is on the wing opposite the opponent's castled king, it's a dagger.  Any queen move onto that diagonal is can be a double attack.  So a perfectly good plan would be to clear the diagonal, planning to pick up undefended material with the queen, after all the exchanges happen.</p>
  
  <p>Until the diagonal is clear, it supports pawns and knights occupying the center, or puts pressure on the opponent's pieces that are there.</p>
  
  <p>What's not to like!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-22T22:38:56.363Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-10-22T22:38:56.363Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.Body: <p>All of your alleged disadvantages are offset by compensating advantages:</p>
  
  <p>1) "The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its natural square." Yes, but when the knight moves it can "discover" an attack by the bishop, while making its own (second) attack.</p>
  
  <p>2) "The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the same team or of the opponents." Yes, but the bishop can be a power weapon in attacking the opponent's pawns (in conjunction with your pawns and pieces), or defending your own.</p>
  
  <p>3) "Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the pawn structure." Yes, but the bishop actually strengthens the whole structure. This is particularly true if the opponent's bishop of the same color has been exchanged for say, a knight.</p>
  
  <p>4) "If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for eg.to b5,then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape route for the other bishop - after for eg. 4) B-b5 a6 5) B-a4 b5 and 6) B-b3 is not possible because of the pawn at b3 and the bishop is trapped. So it somewhat impedes the development of the other bishop." Developing the light squared bishop might require pawns on d4 and e3, blocking the dark squared bishop, which might then be best placed at b2 (or a3).</p>
  
  <p>5) "The fianchetto bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is vulnerable to attack from the sides. Also the 'hole' in the pawn structure can make the rook vulnerable if the fianchetto bishop is moved from its b2 or g2 spot." A fianchettoed bishop is protected by a king. A bishop in the "open" can be trapped by opposing pawns in e.g. a "Noah's Ark" trap.</p>
  
  <p>A fianchettoed bishop is not necessarily in a worse (or better) position than the same bishop in another position. It all depends on what type of game you're playing, against what type of opponent, and what you're trying to accomplish (win, or merely draw).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-11-02T20:16:42.893Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-11-02T20:16:42.893Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tom Au
Answers.Body: <p>First off, A fianchetto allows a lot of advantages. The bishop is moved to a position where it has a lot of control of the center and potentially a lot of mobility. The position is versatile and allows the fianchetto side to develop freely and dictate the position to some extent. If the opponent castles queenside, he is castling into a ferocious attack. If he castles kingside the opponent can decide between a kingside attack (like the KID) or play for a very strong endgame advantage in most cases.</p>
  
  <p>to answer what you said: </p>
  
  <p>1)  "blocked" isn't the right word. "Blocked" means there are no legal moves. What you mean is that the knight controls the same squares. Given that the bishop is better in most cases this really isn't an argument. </p>
  
  <p>2) The bishop can indirectly control squares. For example, if you are black with a pawn on e5 and your opponent plays d4 the bishop is indirectly controlling d4 </p>
  
  <p>3) I'm not sure what you're getting at. You would have to move the g-pawn to fianchetto in the first place. </p>
  
  <p>4) True, although the other bishop can often find a useful function and there are many "standard openings" where that bishop isn't doing much. </p>
  
  <p>5) Weak squares aren't that big of a deal if you know how to defend and can arise just as frequently from non-fianchetto openings. This isn't a problem unique to fianchettoes. </p>
  
  <p>All that being said, where should that bishop move to? c4/c5 is a pretty classical approach but can be countered easily. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-10-10T04:53:28.723Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-10-10T04:53:28.723Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Savage47
Answers.Body: <p>All the things you say are true! But fianchettoed bishops have some advantages as well. Here are a few:</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li><p>They control multiple central squares at once. A fianchettoed bishop attacks half of the center four squares (e.g., a bishop on g2 attacks e4 and d5). Bishops not on the long diagonals can't do this.</p></li>
  <li><p>They also can attack multiple squares around the opponent's king at once. A Dragon bishop on g7 facing a queenside-castled king on b1 casts its eye on c3, b2, and a1.</p></li>
  <li><p>They can attack and defend simultaneously. A bishop on g2 has a lot of influence over the center squares of e4 and d5, not to mention that it can also eye a black pawn at b7 or the rook behind it at a8. But it also protects a castled king, covering f3 and h3.</p></li>
  <li><p>It's not easy to attack them. A bishop at b5, say, is often forced back to b3 with ...a6 ...b5. And Black often even attacks it again from there, say by ...Na5. On the other hand, a fianchettoed bishop on g2 is nicely tucked out of play. Usually the only thing you have to worry about much is an opposing bishop coming to h3 supported by a queen.</p></li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>Deciding where to put your bishops involves a lot of tradeoffs, which include the positive aspects mentioned here as well as the negative ones in your question.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-22T18:47:51.730Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-10-22T18:47:51.730Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: dfan
Body: <p>I have found the following disadvantages of the fianchetto bishop:</p>
  
  <p>1) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its natural square.</p>
  
  <p>2) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the same team or of the opponents.</p>
  
  <p>3) Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the pawn structure.</p>
  
  <p>4) If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for eg.to b5,then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape route for the other bishop - after for eg. 4) B-b5 a6 5) B-a4 b5 and 6) B-b3 is not possible because of the pawn at b3 and the bishop is trapped. So it somewhat impedes the development of the other bishop.</p>
  
  <p>5) The fianchetto bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is vulnerable to attack from the sides. Also the 'hole' in the pawn structure can make the rook vulnerable if the fianchetto bishop is moved from its b2 or g2 spot.</p>
  
  <p>For these reasons, I've personally never preferred the fianchetto.</p>
  
  <p>Yet, despite these drawbacks, the fianchetto development is often used in certain openings such as the Sicilian dragon and variations of QGD. Some players even open the game with the fianchetto. </p>
  
  <p>So, overall, is fianchetto development a good idea and under which conditions is it justified? What are the points to keep in mind during fianchetto development?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-22T20:57:10.080Z
Comments.Text: See also http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/234/why-is-it-a-good-idea-to-fianchetto-above-the-castled-king-if-i-do-that-should
Comments.UserDisplayName: Dag Oskar Madsen
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-22T22:32:42.037Z
Comments.Text: The financhettoed bishops hammer on the center and threaten the opponents knight pawn and rook.  They are also hard to dislodge.   Tasty.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Tags: <opening><strategy><tactics><fianchetto>
Title: Fianchetto bishop vs. normal bishop?
ThreadText: # Fianchetto bishop vs. normal bishop?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2013-10-22)
  
  I have found the following disadvantages of the fianchetto bishop:
  
  1) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its natural square.
  
  2) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the same team or of the opponents.
  
  3) Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the pawn structure.
  
  4) If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for eg.to b5,then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape route for the other bishop - after for eg. 4) B-b5 a6 5) B-a4 b5 and 6) B-b3 is not possible because of the pawn at b3 and the bishop is trapped. So it somewhat impedes the development of the other bishop.
  
  5) The fianchetto bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is vulnerable to attack from the sides. Also the 'hole' in the pawn structure can make the rook vulnerable if the fianchetto bishop is moved from its b2 or g2 spot.
  
  For these reasons, I've personally never preferred the fianchetto.
  
  Yet, despite these drawbacks, the fianchetto development is often used in certain openings such as the Sicilian dragon and variations of QGD. Some players even open the game with the fianchetto.
  
  So, overall, is fianchetto development a good idea and under which conditions is it justified? What are the points to keep in mind during fianchetto development?
  
  **Tags:** opening, strategy, tactics, fianchetto
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: See also http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/234/why-is-it-a-good-idea-to-fianchetto-above-the-castled-king-if-i-do-that-should  
  > **username_2**: The financhettoed bishops hammer on the center and threaten the opponents knight pawn and rook.  They are also hard to dislodge.   Tasty.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2013-10-22. Score: 14 | Accepted answer
  
  All the things you say are true! But fianchettoed bishops have some advantages as well. Here are a few:
  
  1. They control multiple central squares at once. A fianchettoed bishop attacks half of the center four squares (e.g., a bishop on g2 attacks e4 and d5). Bishops not on the long diagonals can't do this.
  2. They also can attack multiple squares around the opponent's king at once. A Dragon bishop on g7 facing a queenside-castled king on b1 casts its eye on c3, b2, and a1.
  3. They can attack and defend simultaneously. A bishop on g2 has a lot of influence over the center squares of e4 and d5, not to mention that it can also eye a black pawn at b7 or the rook behind it at a8. But it also protects a castled king, covering f3 and h3.
  4. It's not easy to attack them. A bishop at b5, say, is often forced back to b3 with ...a6 ...b5. And Black often even attacks it again from there, say by ...Na5. On the other hand, a fianchettoed bishop on g2 is nicely tucked out of play. Usually the only thing you have to worry about much is an opposing bishop coming to h3 supported by a queen.
  
  Deciding where to put your bishops involves a lot of tradeoffs, which include the positive aspects mentioned here as well as the negative ones in your question.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2013-10-23. Score: 7
  
  > 1) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its
  > natural square.
  
  It's not too bad, the knight is a dynamic piece and sooner or later it will be moved.
  
  > 2) The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the
  > same team or of the opponents.
  
  Maybe the main strategy in the opening and middle game after fianchetto is try to not block the diagonal by self pawn and opening the center. A common method is let the opponent make his center by pawns and after that you attack to the center by f or c pawns, in this situation the fianchettoed bishop is useful.
  
  > 3) Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the
  > pawn structure.
  
  Yes. *“Pawns cannot move backwards”* you made your decision to fianchetto and you should pay something. After advancing b or g pawns, neighbor squares in third row are like holes. Try to keep the fianchetto bishop to stop opponent put his pieces in the holes.
  
  > 4) If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for
  > e.g. to b5, then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape
  > route for the other bishop ...
  
  Yes again. After fianchetto a bishop, another bishop can not used to pin the same side knight. Because after attacking to the bishop by pawns a or h, the bishop should give a tempo and comes back or exchanges by opponent knight which is not desired sometimes.
  
  > 5) The fianchettoed bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is
  > vulnerable to attack from the sides...
  
  The main defender is the king. Not to worry about that since you have options to defend your position. Anyway it's chess and everything depends on the exact calculation not broad pieces of advice.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2013-10-22. Score: 1
  
  Such bishops attack the center and the opponent's knight pawn and rook. If the financhetto is on the wing opposite the opponent's castled king, it's a dagger. Any queen move onto that diagonal is can be a double attack. So a perfectly good plan would be to clear the diagonal, planning to pick up undefended material with the queen, after all the exchanges happen.
  
  Until the diagonal is clear, it supports pawns and knights occupying the center, or puts pressure on the opponent's pieces that are there.
  
  What's not to like!
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2013-11-02. Score: 1
  
  All of your alleged disadvantages are offset by compensating advantages:
  
  1) "The diagonal it controls is often blocked by the knight in its natural square." Yes, but when the knight moves it can "discover" an attack by the bishop, while making its own (second) attack.
  
  2) "The diagonal it controls is often blocked by central pawns of the same team or of the opponents." Yes, but the bishop can be a power weapon in attacking the opponent's pawns (in conjunction with your pawns and pieces), or defending your own.
  
  3) "Advancing the knight pawn (b2 -b3 or g2 - g3) somewhat weakens the pawn structure." Yes, but the bishop actually strengthens the whole structure. This is particularly true if the opponent's bishop of the same color has been exchanged for say, a knight.
  
  4) "If the other bishop is developed along its normal diagonal, for eg.to b5,then advancing the knight pawn - b2-b3 cuts off the escape route for the other bishop - after for eg. 4) B-b5 a6 5) B-a4 b5 and 6) B-b3 is not possible because of the pawn at b3 and the bishop is trapped. So it somewhat impedes the development of the other bishop." Developing the light squared bishop might require pawns on d4 and e3, blocking the dark squared bishop, which might then be best placed at b2 (or a3).
  
  5) "The fianchetto bishop cannot be defended by a pawn and is vulnerable to attack from the sides. Also the 'hole' in the pawn structure can make the rook vulnerable if the fianchetto bishop is moved from its b2 or g2 spot." A fianchettoed bishop is protected by a king. A bishop in the "open" can be trapped by opposing pawns in e.g. a "Noah's Ark" trap.
  
  A fianchettoed bishop is not necessarily in a worse (or better) position than the same bishop in another position. It all depends on what type of game you're playing, against what type of opponent, and what you're trying to accomplish (win, or merely draw).
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-10-10. Score: 0
  
  First off, A fianchetto allows a lot of advantages. The bishop is moved to a position where it has a lot of control of the center and potentially a lot of mobility. The position is versatile and allows the fianchetto side to develop freely and dictate the position to some extent. If the opponent castles queenside, he is castling into a ferocious attack. If he castles kingside the opponent can decide between a kingside attack (like the KID) or play for a very strong endgame advantage in most cases.
  
  to answer what you said:
  
  1) "blocked" isn't the right word. "Blocked" means there are no legal moves. What you mean is that the knight controls the same squares. Given that the bishop is better in most cases this really isn't an argument.
  
  2) The bishop can indirectly control squares. For example, if you are black with a pawn on e5 and your opponent plays d4 the bishop is indirectly controlling d4
  
  3) I'm not sure what you're getting at. You would have to move the g-pawn to fianchetto in the first place.
  
  4) True, although the other bishop can often find a useful function and there are many "standard openings" where that bishop isn't doing much.
  
  5) Weak squares aren't that big of a deal if you know how to defend and can arise just as frequently from non-fianchetto openings. This isn't a problem unique to fianchettoes.
  
  All that being said, where should that bishop move to? c4/c5 is a pretty classical approach but can be countered easily.
  
  
  ---
  
  