Answers.Body: <p>While the two are vastly different, if you improve at one, you will most likely also improve at the other.</p>
  
  <p>Tactics are far more important to get right in correspondence chess.  The slightest misstep will be punished by your opponent simply because they have all the time they need to analyze all of the variations, and they can also use at least a board to assist them, and in some cases, even a chess engine.  </p>
  
  <p>In blitz chess, while attacks frequently win the game, unsound moves are not always refuted.  This means that if you are able to launch an attack, even at the cost of a piece, your opponent will most likely be forced to burn time in order to avoid mate, and this will give you an advantage on the clock.  </p>
  
  <p>In terms of long term planning, in correspondence chess, assuming a high level game where tactical blunders will not determine the result, plans become incredibly important.  A correspondence game is frequently a battle between two plans while in blitz chess, tactics and the clock rule the day.</p>
  
  <p>So overall, correspondence chess is a much higher quality game.  Blitz chess is fun and quick (so you can play a lot more games), but in terms of getting better at chess, blitz won't really help you.  If you want to improve at blitz, practice tactics and play more blitz!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-01T19:48:39.920Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-05-01T23:48:23.943Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2012-05-01T23:48:23.943Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew
Answers.Body: <p>It really depends more on your personal level of strength for how play proceeds during each of these types of chess, however in general the same strengths and ideas are applicable to both. The difference in your blitz strength and correspondence strength can be for a number of different reasons. Perhaps you can assess and analyze quickly, or you don't spend as much time as your opponent analyzing during correspondence.</p>
  
  <p>The time control does not dictate whether it will be a "strategical" or "tactical" battle, but instead the choice of openings and player's styles.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-01T22:52:44.700Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-05-01T22:52:44.700Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: JaredDef
Answers.Body: <p>This skills required for blitz are the <em>opposite</em> of those for correspondence. So I suggest that you concentrate on one or the other, but not both. Unless you're an insanely good mental juggler.</p>
  
  <p>"Blitz" places a premium on tactical skills. Also, seeing things <em>faster</em> than your opponent.</p>
  
  <p>"Correspondence" places a premium on strategical skills. Looking many moves ahead, and seeing <em>deeper</em> than your opponent. Because you can both play through the various permutations from a given position at home. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-01T19:30:32.593Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-06-12T01:44:12.573Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2012-06-12T01:44:12.573Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tom Au
Body: <p>I've started playing blitz/bullet (fast) games and felt like I was getting moderately good at it (1 - 10mn games), but then I switched to correspondence chess (1 - 5 days/move) and it seems to me that it was affecting my fast games skills.</p>
  
  <p>Does correspondence chess really require a different set of skills than fast chess? Do you have any advice that may help getting the best of both type of games?</p>
  
Tags: <blitz><online><bullet-chess><online-blitz><correspondence-chess>
Title: Skills required for blitz/bullet vs. correspondence chess?
ThreadText: # Skills required for blitz/bullet vs. correspondence chess?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-05-01)
  
  I've started playing blitz/bullet (fast) games and felt like I was getting moderately good at it (1 - 10mn games), but then I switched to correspondence chess (1 - 5 days/move) and it seems to me that it was affecting my fast games skills.
  
  Does correspondence chess really require a different set of skills than fast chess? Do you have any advice that may help getting the best of both type of games?
  
  **Tags:** blitz, online, bullet-chess, online-blitz, correspondence-chess
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2012-05-01. Score: 10 | Accepted answer
  
  This skills required for blitz are the *opposite* of those for correspondence. So I suggest that you concentrate on one or the other, but not both. Unless you're an insanely good mental juggler.
  
  "Blitz" places a premium on tactical skills. Also, seeing things *faster* than your opponent.
  
  "Correspondence" places a premium on strategical skills. Looking many moves ahead, and seeing *deeper* than your opponent. Because you can both play through the various permutations from a given position at home.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2012-05-01. Score: 12
  
  While the two are vastly different, if you improve at one, you will most likely also improve at the other.
  
  Tactics are far more important to get right in correspondence chess. The slightest misstep will be punished by your opponent simply because they have all the time they need to analyze all of the variations, and they can also use at least a board to assist them, and in some cases, even a chess engine.
  
  In blitz chess, while attacks frequently win the game, unsound moves are not always refuted. This means that if you are able to launch an attack, even at the cost of a piece, your opponent will most likely be forced to burn time in order to avoid mate, and this will give you an advantage on the clock.
  
  In terms of long term planning, in correspondence chess, assuming a high level game where tactical blunders will not determine the result, plans become incredibly important. A correspondence game is frequently a battle between two plans while in blitz chess, tactics and the clock rule the day.
  
  So overall, correspondence chess is a much higher quality game. Blitz chess is fun and quick (so you can play a lot more games), but in terms of getting better at chess, blitz won't really help you. If you want to improve at blitz, practice tactics and play more blitz!
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2012-05-01. Score: 6
  
  It really depends more on your personal level of strength for how play proceeds during each of these types of chess, however in general the same strengths and ideas are applicable to both. The difference in your blitz strength and correspondence strength can be for a number of different reasons. Perhaps you can assess and analyze quickly, or you don't spend as much time as your opponent analyzing during correspondence.
  
  The time control does not dictate whether it will be a "strategical" or "tactical" battle, but instead the choice of openings and player's styles.
  
  
  ---
  
  