Answers.Body: <p>After quickly looking at the differences, I think Qb3 is more suited if you want to fianchetto. </p>
  
  <p>The queen puts pressure on b7 and d5 and combines nicely with a fianchettoed king bishop.</p>
  
  <p>If the queen is on c2 black often plays g6, planning to fianchetto and also play Bf5 with tempo. </p>
  
  <p>Both moves are equaly popular. The choice is yours!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-24T21:28:48.880Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-05-03T10:26:13.797Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-05-03T10:26:13.797Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Kellis90
Answers.Body: <p>The difference is that Qc2 will allow you to later push the b pawn at the expense of you pressuring the black b7 pawn. With the Queen on c2 you also gain the option of combining the Qc2 and Bd3 against the h7 pawn later when the black King is castle. I recommend delaying the Queen move until later. Develop your pieces and castle first. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-25T01:56:52.883Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-25T01:56:52.883Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: JG Estiot
Body: <p>In the Slav, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 :</p>
  
  <p>What are all the differences between 4. Qc2 and 4. Qb3 ?</p>
  
  <p>Which one of them is better to reach some Catalan type positions?</p>
  
  <p>Which one of them tends to lead (on average) to the most solid, quiet, positional, slow, safe and strategic positions (i.e. the least sharp and tactical positions) ?</p>
  
  <p>Is one of the two objectively stronger than the other?</p>
  
  <p>.</p>
  
  <p>I have made some research and here is what I've found:</p>
  
  <p>If Black plays 4...dxc4 then they transpose (except if White is crazy enough to try the rare gambit 4. Qc2 dxc4 5. e4 but I'm never going to play this anyway).</p>
  
  <p>Against 4. Qc2 Black often plays 4...g6, while against 4. Qb3 the move 4...g6 seems to be less popular.</p>
  
  <p>If Black plays 4...e6, maybe it makes a difference if the Queen is on c2 or on b3. Not sure.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T12:11:41.970Z
Comments.Text: You get the most solid, quiet, positional, slow, safe and strategic positions against the Slav if you play the Exchange Slav, which isn't so bad theoretically anyway.
Comments.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T12:50:57.807Z
Comments.Text: @BlindKungFuMaster: Could you clarify what "not so bad theoretically" means precisely? Does it mean that the Exchange Slav gives Black equality but it's "not so bad" for White because it at least doesn't give Black an advantage? Or does it mean that White still has a significant advantage in the Exchange Slav?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Fate
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T13:19:39.760Z
Comments.Text: I think today there are no significant advantages to be found for white, no matter where you look. But the Exchange Slav isn't easy equality for black by any means. Even a 2800 player can still go down against it … http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1687266
Comments.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T13:24:03.157Z
Comments.Text: Or an almost 2800 player (at the time), another recent game I remember: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1699939
Comments.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-24T13:06:07.420Z
Comments.Text: @BlindKungFuMaster: But I see that in both of those two games White played the Nc3 Exchange Slav. I start with 1. Nf3, not 1. d4, so if I play the Exchange it will be the Nf3 Exchange: 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 3. c4 c6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Is this variation of the Exchange Slav also very popular at the GM level? Or is it regarded as inferior to the Nc3 Exchange Slav?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Fate
Tags: <opening><theory><1.d4><slav-defense><catalan>
Title: In the Slav, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6, what are all the differences between 4. Qc2 and 4. Qb3?
ThreadText: # In the Slav, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6, what are all the differences between 4. Qc2 and 4. Qb3?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-23)
  
  In the Slav, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 :
  
  What are all the differences between 4. Qc2 and 4. Qb3 ?
  
  Which one of them is better to reach some Catalan type positions?
  
  Which one of them tends to lead (on average) to the most solid, quiet, positional, slow, safe and strategic positions (i.e. the least sharp and tactical positions) ?
  
  Is one of the two objectively stronger than the other?
  
  .
  
  I have made some research and here is what I've found:
  
  If Black plays 4...dxc4 then they transpose (except if White is crazy enough to try the rare gambit 4. Qc2 dxc4 5. e4 but I'm never going to play this anyway).
  
  Against 4. Qc2 Black often plays 4...g6, while against 4. Qb3 the move 4...g6 seems to be less popular.
  
  If Black plays 4...e6, maybe it makes a difference if the Queen is on c2 or on b3. Not sure.
  
  **Tags:** opening, theory, 1.d4, slav-defense, catalan
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: You get the most solid, quiet, positional, slow, safe and strategic positions against the Slav if you play the Exchange Slav, which isn't so bad theoretically anyway.  
  > **username_0**: @username_1: Could you clarify what "not so bad theoretically" means precisely? Does it mean that the Exchange Slav gives Black equality but it's "not so bad" for White because it at least doesn't give Black an advantage? Or does it mean that White still has a significant advantage in the Exchange Slav?  
  > **username_1**: I think today there are no significant advantages to be found for white, no matter where you look. But the Exchange Slav isn't easy equality for black by any means. Even a 2800 player can still go down against it … http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1687266  
  > **username_1**: Or an almost 2800 player (at the time), another recent game I remember: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1699939  
  > **username_0**: @username_1: But I see that in both of those two games White played the Nc3 Exchange Slav. I start with 1. Nf3, not 1. d4, so if I play the Exchange it will be the Nf3 Exchange: 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 3. c4 c6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Is this variation of the Exchange Slav also very popular at the GM level? Or is it regarded as inferior to the Nc3 Exchange Slav?  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2015-05-24. Score: 2
  
  After quickly looking at the differences, I think Qb3 is more suited if you want to fianchetto.
  
  The queen puts pressure on b7 and d5 and combines nicely with a fianchettoed king bishop.
  
  If the queen is on c2 black often plays g6, planning to fianchetto and also play Bf5 with tempo.
  
  Both moves are equaly popular. The choice is yours!
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2015-05-25. Score: 1
  
  The difference is that Qc2 will allow you to later push the b pawn at the expense of you pressuring the black b7 pawn. With the Queen on c2 you also gain the option of combining the Qc2 and Bd3 against the h7 pawn later when the black King is castle. I recommend delaying the Queen move until later. Develop your pieces and castle first.
  
  
  ---
  
  