Answers.Body: <p>There are a couple of things to track.</p>
  <ol>
  <li><p>Opening knowledge<br />
  Most of us has opening repertoire, you can practice it say once a week and record how many of it that you can solve. It is like a puzzle and you have to find the best move or idea.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>Middle game knowledge<br />
  Same as in the opening.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>Ending knowledge<br />
  Same as in the opening.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>Memorize/understand a whole game, these are games that are related to your style or opening and are full of instructive plays. Practice it say once a week, Can you perfect it?</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>You can use ACPL if you have a fix opponent. Obviously you cannot use human opponents because they can change. So the best candidate for a fix opponent is an engine. Choose an engine that is close to your strength. Play it at say 4 games per week, then measure your ACPL. If you beat it with ease, choose another stronger engine.</p>
  </li>
  </ol>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-25T21:33:40.167Z
Answers.Text: I would like to emphasize, that the ACPL / chess.com-accuracy is dependent on the opening variation and tends to be much lower in quiet positions than in wild tactical games. So when tracking ACPL performance, take repertoire changes into consideration. Some positions are so complex that even strong players will have a low precision while others are so simple, that even weak players may get decent scores. My Caro-Kann precision is higher than my Sicilian precision, even though I'm equally successful in both openings. The Sicilian is just harder to play (for both sides).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauptideal
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-19T11:17:25.157Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-06-25T03:09:33.493Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-06-25T03:09:33.493Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ferdy
Answers.Body: <p>Not really.</p>
  <p>By that I mean that if you want to track something other than actual rating, but that was based on rating instead, then it's possible. For example, you could give puzzles in increasing degrees of difficulty, but that difficulty would be based on rating.</p>
  <p>Otherwise, everything in most games is based on rating. There are many rating systems and chess uses an ELO system. For example, in sports seasons they use W-L ratios or points systems, which are also a type of rating. Even calculation of an average centipawn loss is a rating although engines wouldn't really be accurate as chess is not solved yet.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-19T03:35:59.383Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-06-19T03:35:59.383Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jack M.
Answers.Body: <p>One metric that I quite like to use is accuracy. I'm not sure about other websites, but with the premium Chess.com subscription you can run an engine analysis on each game you play. With this analysis comes an accuracy percentage 0-100% e.g. if you played the perfect move each time you would have an accuracy of 100%.</p>
  <p>Over the year I've been playing I've noticed that I've gone from an average accuracy of ~60% when I was rated 600 elo, to an average accuracy of 70%-80% at 1200 elo. It's quite a nice way to measure improvement because although you will likely have lower accuracy in games you lose, your accuracy is somewhat independent on the result of the game (you can still play amazingly and still lose because of 1 blunder).</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/oxIkh.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/oxIkh.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-25T21:34:00.773Z
Answers.Text: I would like to emphasize, that the ACPL / chess.com-accuracy is dependent on the opening variation and tends to be much lower in quiet positions than in wild tactical games. So when tracking ACPL performance, take repertoire changes into consideration. Some positions are so complex that even strong players will have a low precision while others are so simple, that even weak players may get decent scores. My Caro-Kann precision is higher than my Sicilian precision, even though I'm equally successful in both openings. The Sicilian is just harder to play (for both sides).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauptideal
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-20T10:15:24.023Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-06-20T10:15:24.023Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ralt
Answers.Body: <p>If you live in a county with a large Swiss Tournament that consistant have the same people playing then you could track the score in the tournament.    (You could also use the rating of the other players to work out your tournament rating.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-06-19T18:41:41.240Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-06-19T18:41:41.240Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Ringrose
Body: <p>For example, could one measure ACPL (Average CentiPawn Loss) over time to detect progress? Could masters look at the games of a player and determine they're playing better even if their rating isn't going up, assuming their losses aren't attributed to time trouble or poor internet connection?</p>
  
Tags: <rating>
Title: Besides rating consistency and rating going up, are there other objective ways to track progress in chess performance?
ThreadText: # Besides rating consistency and rating going up, are there other objective ways to track progress in chess performance?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-06-19)
  
  For example, could one measure ACPL (Average CentiPawn Loss) over time to detect progress? Could masters look at the games of a player and determine they're playing better even if their rating isn't going up, assuming their losses aren't attributed to time trouble or poor internet connection?
  
  **Tags:** rating
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-06-19. Score: 9 | Accepted answer
  
  There are a couple of things to track.
  
  1. Opening knowledge  
     Most of us has opening repertoire, you can practice it say once a week and record how many of it that you can solve. It is like a puzzle and you have to find the best move or idea.
  2. Middle game knowledge  
     Same as in the opening.
  3. Ending knowledge  
     Same as in the opening.
  4. Memorize/understand a whole game, these are games that are related to your style or opening and are full of instructive plays. Practice it say once a week, Can you perfect it?
  5. You can use ACPL if you have a fix opponent. Obviously you cannot use human opponents because they can change. So the best candidate for a fix opponent is an engine. Choose an engine that is close to your strength. Play it at say 4 games per week, then measure your ACPL. If you beat it with ease, choose another stronger engine.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: I would like to emphasize, that the ACPL / chess.com-accuracy is dependent on the opening variation and tends to be much lower in quiet positions than in wild tactical games. So when tracking ACPL performance, take repertoire changes into consideration. Some positions are so complex that even strong players will have a low precision while others are so simple, that even weak players may get decent scores. My Caro-Kann precision is higher than my Sicilian precision, even though I'm equally successful in both openings. The Sicilian is just harder to play (for both sides).  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2022-06-19. Score: 5
  
  Not really.
  
  By that I mean that if you want to track something other than actual rating, but that was based on rating instead, then it's possible. For example, you could give puzzles in increasing degrees of difficulty, but that difficulty would be based on rating.
  
  Otherwise, everything in most games is based on rating. There are many rating systems and chess uses an ELO system. For example, in sports seasons they use W-L ratios or points systems, which are also a type of rating. Even calculation of an average centipawn loss is a rating although engines wouldn't really be accurate as chess is not solved yet.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2022-06-20. Score: 5
  
  One metric that I quite like to use is accuracy. I'm not sure about other websites, but with the premium Chess.com subscription you can run an engine analysis on each game you play. With this analysis comes an accuracy percentage 0-100% e.g. if you played the perfect move each time you would have an accuracy of 100%.
  
  Over the year I've been playing I've noticed that I've gone from an average accuracy of ~60% when I was rated 600 elo, to an average accuracy of 70%-80% at 1200 elo. It's quite a nice way to measure improvement because although you will likely have lower accuracy in games you lose, your accuracy is somewhat independent on the result of the game (you can still play amazingly and still lose because of 1 blunder).
  
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/oxIkh.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/oxIkh.png)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: I would like to emphasize, that the ACPL / chess.com-accuracy is dependent on the opening variation and tends to be much lower in quiet positions than in wild tactical games. So when tracking ACPL performance, take repertoire changes into consideration. Some positions are so complex that even strong players will have a low precision while others are so simple, that even weak players may get decent scores. My Caro-Kann precision is higher than my Sicilian precision, even though I'm equally successful in both openings. The Sicilian is just harder to play (for both sides).  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2022-06-19. Score: 1
  
  If you live in a county with a large Swiss Tournament that consistant have the same people playing then you could track the score in the tournament. (You could also use the rating of the other players to work out your tournament rating.)
  
  
  ---
  
  