Answers.Body: <p>The knight move is illegal since one may not expose one's king to check.  That the rook is pinned is of no relevance.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T05:39:45.213Z
Answers.Text: yes, I've consider that, but in this case, taking king is legal..
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ahmad Azwar Anas
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T11:15:11.690Z
Answers.Text: In chess, the king cannot be captured, so I don't know what you mean.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-12T04:47:57.687Z
Answers.Text: thanks.. I've found [the answer](http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/1515/bizarre-pin-rule-pinned-pieces-do-not-attack).. may be you should read it first.. ^^
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ahmad Azwar Anas
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-12T12:12:01.983Z
Answers.Text: It's a variant.  It isn't standard chess.  You can make up any rules that please you in that case.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T04:04:32.610Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-10-11T04:04:32.610Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Body: <p>I've been asked my friend about enable take king to determine the winner..</p>
  
  <p>who's the winner if the condition like this?? (some Fide rule should necessary)</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN "7k/6r1/7p/8/8/2B1q3/6N1/6K1 - - - 0 0 "] 
  
  1. Ng2xQe3 Rg7xKg1 2. Bc3xKh8 
  </code></pre>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T06:04:24.053Z
Comments.Text: Intuitively, black would win, because he takes the white king first, and the game ends at that point.
Comments.UserDisplayName: James Christopher
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T10:50:46.440Z
Comments.Text: Based on your comment on Tony Ennis's answer, you are playing a variant where taking king is legal. If that is the case, how would others know the rules of your or your friend's variant?
Comments.UserDisplayName: JiK
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-11T12:39:57.597Z
Comments.Text: I think the comment from @JiK is spot on, and there isn't really a clear, answerable question here. I'm going to close this question; it can be reopened if it is edited into something more suitable. For what it's worth, there is a somewhat related earlier question: http://chess.stackexchange.com/q/1515/167
Comments.UserDisplayName: ETD
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-10-12T04:43:45.560Z
Comments.Text: thanks @[EdDean](http://chess.stackexchange.com/users/167/ed-dean), from the [Q&A](http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/1515/bizarre-pin-rule-pinned-pieces-do-not-attack), I realize that were chess variant.. as @[JamesChristopher](http://chess.stackexchange.com/users/1580/james-christopher) said, **Black** definitely **won**.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Ahmad Azwar Anas
Tags: <analysis><chess-variants>
Title: Determine winner based on taking king
ThreadText: # Determine winner based on taking king
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2013-10-11)
  
  I've been asked my friend about enable take king to determine the winner..
  
  who's the winner if the condition like this?? (some Fide rule should necessary)
  
  ```
  [FEN "7k/6r1/7p/8/8/2B1q3/6N1/6K1 - - - 0 0 "] 
  
  1. Ng2xQe3 Rg7xKg1 2. Bc3xKh8 
  
  ```
  
  **Tags:** analysis, chess-variants
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Intuitively, black would win, because he takes the white king first, and the game ends at that point.  
  > **username_2**: Based on your comment on username_4 username_4's answer, you are playing a variant where taking king is legal. If that is the case, how would others know the rules of your or your friend's variant?  
  > **username_3**: I think the comment from @username_2 is spot on, and there isn't really a clear, answerable question here. I'm going to close this question; it can be reopened if it is edited into something more suitable. For what it's worth, there is a somewhat related earlier question: http://chess.stackexchange.com/q/1515/167  
  > **username_0**: thanks @[EdDean](http://chess.stackexchange.com/users/167/ed-dean), from the [Q&A](http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/1515/bizarre-pin-rule-pinned-pieces-do-not-attack), I realize that were chess variant.. as @[username_1](http://chess.stackexchange.com/users/1580/username_1) said, **Black** definitely **won**.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2013-10-11. Score: 5 | Accepted answer
  
  The knight move is illegal since one may not expose one's king to check. That the rook is pinned is of no relevance.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: yes, I've consider that, but in this case, taking king is legal..  
  > **username_4**: In chess, the king cannot be captured, so I don't know what you mean.  
  > **username_0**: thanks.. I've found [the answer](http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/1515/bizarre-pin-rule-pinned-pieces-do-not-attack).. may be you should read it first.. ^^  
  > **username_4**: It's a variant.  It isn't standard chess.  You can make up any rules that please you in that case.  
  
  ---
  
  