Answers.Body: <p>Nobody knows who he played, because nobody has come forward to take credit; however, some chess sleuths compared the moves against various engines and found that there was considerable evidence to support a particular engine (I believe it was called "blitz tiger") as the mysterious Fischer.  Because of the incident where Short chatted with Fischer, there must have been a human behind the account as well (many accounts on the ICC are run entirely by computers without any human interaction at all).  The ICC can probably do some user profiling to figure out who the player is either by comparing the location/IP/e-mail to another user or by doing some internet forensics based on information they gathered from the incident.  However, it seems like they either don't care or if they did find out, they don't want to share (based on what xaisoft said) so it will probably always be a mystery.  And, to be honest, it's a better story that way, and because all this is is a good story, that's a good thing.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-12-10T17:38:18.200Z
Answers.Text: I doubt ICC keeps server logs for the 10+ years that would be required to do this kind of analysis.
Answers.UserDisplayName: David Richerby
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-12-06T20:03:51.977Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-12-06T20:03:51.977Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew Latham
Answers.Body: <p>If you can believe that Fischer would play as white:
  1.f4 e5 2.f5 d5 3.g4 Qh4# White checkmated 0-1
  Unlikely.  More likely it was someone with a chess engine having some fun, likely someone who is very inexperienced as provided by the example.  He would make very poor opening moves and let the chess engine take over beating many GM's. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-10-08T01:17:48.347Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-10-08T01:17:48.347Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ray
Answers.Body: <p>Well, as of 2021 a much more concrete answer can be provided: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/mv0vz5/solving_the_fischer_chess_games_in_2001_gm_nigel/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/mv0vz5/solving_the_fischer_chess_games_in_2001_gm_nigel/</a></p>
  <p>In short (pun not intended): 'Fischer' was actually Deep Fritz using its second choice moves. (Apparently, every move played by 'Fischer' after the first few turns corresponded to Deep Fritz's second choice.) Another engine with high correspondence was Gambit Tiger.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-05-25T19:29:58.090Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-05-25T19:29:58.090Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mobeus Zoom
Answers.Body: <p>Fischer never, ever denied it.  What he said was he doesn't play chess anymore, and when a reporter told him what Nigel said, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um1Ji9MUqgo" rel="nofollow noreferrer">he responded</a> &quot;He can say what he wants&quot;.  Not playing anymore means currently; that game happened prior to that interview, so it wouldn't be a lie.  The fact that he didn't outright say that Nigel was lying seems... A little Fischy to me.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-01-25T17:00:17.557Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-07-06T11:38:07.080Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-07-06T11:38:07.080Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Cory
Body: <p>In 2001, Nigel Short went public with the <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130630071150/http://www.bobby-fischer.net/Bobby_Fischer_Articles51.html" rel="noreferrer">opinion that he had in fact played Bobby Fischer on the Internet Chess Club</a>.</p>
  <p>This was denied by Fischer himself, and the consensus seems to be that it was not in fact Fischer that he was playing. However, though I have the impression of reading something about who Short was really playing some time ago, I cannot remember this for sure and now cannot find a conclusive source on who Short's opponent actually was. Has there ever been a definitive statement on this?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-08-20T01:06:04.673Z
Comments.Text: I know of no definitive source as to the true identity of "ICC Fischer," but the notion that it was someone operating an engine always struck me as plausible and probable. Here's a piece by Frederic Friedel from 2001 making a case for that: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=11  (Note the link to several games of "ICC Fischer" at the bottom of that page, for those curious.)
Comments.UserDisplayName: ETD
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-08-21T14:53:32.230Z
Comments.Text: I asked the ICC this and they basically told me to shut up.
Comments.UserDisplayName: xaisoft
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-05T20:16:48.427Z
Comments.Text: Except that Nigel Short asked the player in conversation a question to test his knoweldge of obscure chess masters of the 60's.  Short asked this player if he knew Armando Acevedo (an obscure Mexican player).  The instantaneous response was "Siegen 1970."  Fischer had played Acevedo at the Siegen Chess Olympiad in 1970.  If a chess computer had been used Short reasoned the response would not have been instantaneous.  This was sufficient to convince Short.  So if we're going to speculate on this we should consider Short's own view.  Also computers tend to stick to well known opening theories ..
Comments.UserDisplayName: user34445
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-01-28T05:08:44.980Z
Comments.Text: Except that even though Acevedo isn't a very famous chess player, his game against Fischer in these olympiads is pretty famous as an example of spatial domination and middlegame zugzwang. If the program operator had some chess knowledge and wasn't too young, it's not hard to answer instantly. It can also go pretty quickly to copy paste that name in google and click on the first link (you can copy paste texts from ICC chat afaI remember).
Comments.UserDisplayName: Emphyrio
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-08-29T20:36:52.497Z
Comments.Text: Well, "Acevedo" alone doesn't lead to any Acevedo - Fischer game with Google... perhaps the operator knew the famous game pretty well, but then why expose himself if he was indeed Fischer?
Comments.UserDisplayName: A. N. Other
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-05-25T19:31:04.863Z
Comments.Text: See my answer below: as of analysis conducted in 2021 the mystery is all but solved.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Mobeus Zoom
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-06-28T10:39:49.767Z
Comments.Text: @user34445 except that Short himself changed his mind about this issue some time later: https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/33484/in-which-article-did-nigel-short-retract-from-having-played-online-vs-fischer
Comments.UserDisplayName: emdio
Tags: <history><famous-players><famous-games><fischer><famous-events>
Title: Who did Nigel Short really play on the ICC in 2001 when he thought he was playing Fischer?
ThreadText: # Who did Nigel Short really play on the ICC in 2001 when he thought he was playing Fischer?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-08-19)
  
  In 2001, Nigel Short went public with the [opinion that he had in fact played Bobby Fischer on the Internet Chess Club](http://web.archive.org/web/20130630071150/http://www.bobby-fischer.net/Bobby_Fischer_Articles51.html).
  
  This was denied by Fischer himself, and the consensus seems to be that it was not in fact Fischer that he was playing. However, though I have the impression of reading something about who Short was really playing some time ago, I cannot remember this for sure and now cannot find a conclusive source on who Short's opponent actually was. Has there ever been a definitive statement on this?
  
  **Tags:** history, famous-players, famous-games, fischer, famous-events
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: I know of no definitive source as to the true identity of "ICC Fischer," but the notion that it was someone operating an engine always struck me as plausible and probable. Here's a piece by Frederic Friedel from 2001 making a case for that: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=11  (Note the link to several games of "ICC Fischer" at the bottom of that page, for those curious.)  
  > **username_2**: I asked the ICC this and they basically told me to shut up.  
  > **username_3**: Except that Nigel Short asked the player in conversation a question to test his knoweldge of obscure chess masters of the 60's.  Short asked this player if he knew Armando Acevedo (an obscure Mexican player).  The instantaneous response was "Siegen 1970."  Fischer had played Acevedo at the Siegen Chess Olympiad in 1970.  If a chess computer had been used Short reasoned the response would not have been instantaneous.  This was sufficient to convince Short.  So if we're going to speculate on this we should consider Short's own view.  Also computers tend to stick to well known opening theories ..  
  > **username_4**: Except that even though Acevedo isn't a very famous chess player, his game against Fischer in these olympiads is pretty famous as an example of spatial domination and middlegame zugzwang. If the program operator had some chess knowledge and wasn't too young, it's not hard to answer instantly. It can also go pretty quickly to copy paste that name in google and click on the first link (you can copy paste texts from ICC chat afaI remember).  
  > **username_5**: Well, "Acevedo" alone doesn't lead to any Acevedo - Fischer game with Google... perhaps the operator knew the famous game pretty well, but then why expose himself if he was indeed Fischer?  
  > **username_6**: See my answer below: as of analysis conducted in 2021 the mystery is all but solved.  
  > **username_7**: @username_3 except that Short himself changed his mind about this issue some time later: https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/33484/in-which-article-did-nigel-short-retract-from-having-played-online-vs-fischer  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2012-12-06. Score: 16
  
  Nobody knows who he played, because nobody has come forward to take credit; however, some chess sleuths compared the moves against various engines and found that there was considerable evidence to support a particular engine (I believe it was called "blitz tiger") as the mysterious Fischer. Because of the incident where Short chatted with Fischer, there must have been a human behind the account as well (many accounts on the ICC are run entirely by computers without any human interaction at all). The ICC can probably do some user profiling to figure out who the player is either by comparing the location/IP/e-mail to another user or by doing some internet forensics based on information they gathered from the incident. However, it seems like they either don't care or if they did find out, they don't want to share (based on what username_2 said) so it will probably always be a mystery. And, to be honest, it's a better story that way, and because all this is is a good story, that's a good thing.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_9**: I doubt ICC keeps server logs for the 10+ years that would be required to do this kind of analysis.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_10 on 2013-10-08. Score: 7
  
  If you can believe that Fischer would play as white:
  1.f4 e5 2.f5 d5 3.g4 Qh4# White checkmated 0-1
  Unlikely. More likely it was someone with a chess engine having some fun, likely someone who is very inexperienced as provided by the example. He would make very poor opening moves and let the chess engine take over beating many GM's.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2021-05-25. Score: 6
  
  Well, as of 2021 a much more concrete answer can be provided: <https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/mv0vz5/solving_the_fischer_chess_games_in_2001_gm_nigel/>
  
  In short (pun not intended): 'Fischer' was actually Deep Fritz using its second choice moves. (Apparently, every move played by 'Fischer' after the first few turns corresponded to Deep Fritz's second choice.) Another engine with high correspondence was Gambit Tiger.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_11 on 2018-01-25. Score: 5
  
  Fischer never, ever denied it. What he said was he doesn't play chess anymore, and when a reporter told him what Nigel said, [he responded](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um1Ji9MUqgo) "He can say what he wants". Not playing anymore means currently; that game happened prior to that interview, so it wouldn't be a lie. The fact that he didn't outright say that Nigel was lying seems... A little Fischy to me.
  
  
  ---
  
  