Answers.Body: <p>In general it's a good idea, but to every rule there are exceptions. For example, if your opponent's king is safe (such as from castling) and he has lots of pieces around defending, sacrificing the knight on f7 may not be a good idea.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-31T16:46:46.507Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-31T16:46:46.507Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.Body: <p>I am convinced that saccing a bishop (but not a knight) against opponent's KB2 (to use the old notation which works better when discussing BH sometimes) is reasonable simply because 1. a bishop is not that valuable in BH 2. your partner gets a pawn that can be plopped down anywhere and sometimes a pawn, placed on the 7th rank, is better than placing a B there.</p>
  <p>But would 4 world class players play differently because the sac is basically unsound and the loss of the bishop is too much if the opponent defends right? I am not world class but I sure see top players making this sac against my team -- maybe if my rating was 300 points higher, they would not.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-11-27T23:37:26.583Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-11-27T23:37:26.583Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: releseabe
Answers.Body: <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcKXwA_lo3Zpz3_Mc-WVLtw" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcKXwA_lo3Zpz3_Mc-WVLtw</a> is the YouTube channel of Helmsknight.  She is a strong player who plays with Nakamura, Seirawan, and many other high rated players.  Interesting is that all these players tend to castle before starting an attack.</p>
  
  <p>Just like normal chess, starting an attack on this (these) square(s) is often a good idea.  However, I used to take advantage of this common attack and have both boards play passively.  Soon my opponents would be down a couple of pieces (on each board sometimes) and no resources to continue the attack.</p>
  
  <p>For a better understanding of proper use of resources, Crazyhouse is the variant.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-30T11:17:00.140Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-30T11:17:00.140Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mike Jones
Body: <p>In Bughouse, players often target the f2/f7 square; it is common to see a minor sack on f7, followed by a knight on g5 delivering check and breaching through the opponent's defenses.</p>
  
  <p>I recently played a <a href="https://www.chess.com/live#g=3976463097" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Lichess Bughouse game</a> where, even though the opponent castled, the f7 square still offered opportunity.</p>
  
  <p>Personally I think I'm still novice with bughouse, so I'm wondering if just attacking the f2/f7 square is a good rule of thumb. Or, is there is some better general advice for beginner or intermediate players to follow?</p>
  
Tags: <sacrifice><attack><bughouse>
Title: Is targeting the f7/f2 square in bughouse a good rule of thumb?
ThreadText: # Is targeting the f7/f2 square in bughouse a good rule of thumb?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-08-25)
  
  In Bughouse, players often target the f2/f7 square; it is common to see a minor sack on f7, followed by a knight on g5 delivering check and breaching through the opponent's defenses.
  
  I recently played a [Lichess Bughouse game](https://www.chess.com/live#g=3976463097) where, even though the opponent castled, the f7 square still offered opportunity.
  
  Personally I think I'm still novice with bughouse, so I'm wondering if just attacking the f2/f7 square is a good rule of thumb. Or, is there is some better general advice for beginner or intermediate players to follow?
  
  **Tags:** sacrifice, attack, bughouse
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-08-30. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcKXwA_lo3Zpz3_Mc-WVLtw> is the YouTube channel of Helmsknight. She is a strong player who plays with Nakamura, Seirawan, and many other high rated players. Interesting is that all these players tend to castle before starting an attack.
  
  Just like normal chess, starting an attack on this (these) square(s) is often a good idea. However, I used to take advantage of this common attack and have both boards play passively. Soon my opponents would be down a couple of pieces (on each board sometimes) and no resources to continue the attack.
  
  For a better understanding of proper use of resources, Crazyhouse is the variant.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-08-31. Score: 2
  
  In general it's a good idea, but to every rule there are exceptions. For example, if your opponent's king is safe (such as from castling) and he has lots of pieces around defending, sacrificing the knight on f7 may not be a good idea.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2020-11-27. Score: 0
  
  I am convinced that saccing a bishop (but not a knight) against opponent's KB2 (to use the old notation which works better when discussing BH sometimes) is reasonable simply because 1. a bishop is not that valuable in BH 2. your partner gets a pawn that can be plopped down anywhere and sometimes a pawn, placed on the 7th rank, is better than placing a B there.
  
  But would 4 world class players play differently because the sac is basically unsound and the loss of the bishop is too much if the opponent defends right? I am not world class but I sure see top players making this sac against my team -- maybe if my rating was 300 points higher, they would not.
  
  
  ---
  
  