Answers.Body: <p>The reality is that you cannot force such openings as black, but you can pick openings that may suit your style.</p>
  
  <p>I really think that the Nimzo-Indian/Queens-Indian may suit your style very well. They will not get you queenless positions too often right out of the opening, but the nature of the Nc3 in the Nimzo, and it often getting exchanged resulting in doubled pawns for white, you will get a lot of strategically complex positions that have structural weaknesses to work against (usually in exchange for the bishop pair), and there is often a lot of maneuvering. In the Queens-Indian, you get the fianchettoed bishop you like, and nice control over e4, which allows you to try and chip away as the white center. I have also gotten a number of nice kingside attacks too against the white Kg1.</p>
  
  <p>This has been my bread and butter opening pair as black against 1.d4 for decades, and I like the type of positions that you like. The theory is old now, but if you can get a hold of the book "<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0890580510" rel="noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Understanding the Queens Indian Defense</a>" on eBay, it does a great job of teaching the underlying ideas. You can also study Karpov's games, as this was his main weapon as black during his peak years.</p>
  
  <p>In the Nimzo take this famous game in the Huebner variation of the Nimzo. Of course, there are many variations, and you would have to learn more than just the Huebner.</p>
  
  <pre><code> [Event "World-ch27 Fischer-Spassky +7-3=11"]
   [Site "Reykjavik"]
   [Date "1972.07.20"]
   [Round "5"]
   [White "Spassky, Boris Vasilievich"]
   [Black "Fischer, Robert James"]
   [Result "0-1"]
   [ECO "E41"]
   [BlackElo "2785"]
   [PlyCount "54"]
   [EventDate "1972.07.11"]
   [EventType "match"]
   [EventRounds "21"]
   [EventCountry "ISL"]
   [FEN ""]
  
   1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 c5 5. e3 Nc6 6. Bd3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 d6 8. e4 e5 9. d5 Ne7 10. Nh4 h6 11. f4 Ng6 12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Be3 b6 15. O-O O-O 16. a4 a5 17. Rb1 Bd7 18. Rb2 Rb8 19. Rbf2 Qe7 20. Bc2 g5 21. Bd2 Qe8 22. Be1 Qg6 23. Qd3 Nh5 24. Rxf8+ Rxf8 25. Rxf8+ Kxf8 26. Bd1 Nf4 27. Qc2 Bxa4 0-1
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-24T20:20:41.403Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-24T20:20:41.403Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Body: <p>When I started playing chess I picked 3 openings (Queens Gambit as white, Caro-Kann and QGD as black) and pretty much stopped studying the openings to focus on endgames and middlegames.
  Some months ago I started analysing the games of Ulf Andersson and fell in love with the English Opening. I am wondering if there are black openings who are similar.</p>
  
  <p>My current repertoire looks like this: </p>
  
  <p>• White: English</p>
  
  <p>• Black: Caro-Kann (vs. 1.e4) and Nimzo/QID (vs. 1. d4)</p>
  
  <p>Some info on what I like in the English and in general:</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li><p>My preferred way to win is getting a small advantage and converting into a winning endgame. I love endgames.</p></li>
  <li><p>I really like playing against structural weaknesses.</p></li>
  <li><p>I do enjoy queenless middlegames.</p></li>
  <li><p>I like quiet games with time to maneuver and frequently employ a double fianchetto as white.</p></li>
  </ol>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-03-24T20:25:44.477Z
Comments.Text: Have you looked into `1.e4 e5`? The most critical line will probably be the Berlin Defense, which fits your description perfectly. However, there is a lot of theory including gambits that you should be prepared for. I wonder if you gave this any consideration.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Akavall
Tags: <opening><english-opening><repertoire>
Title: Black repertoire for players who love the English Opening
ThreadText: # Black repertoire for players who love the English Opening
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-24)
  
  When I started playing chess I picked 3 openings (Queens Gambit as white, Caro-Kann and QGD as black) and pretty much stopped studying the openings to focus on endgames and middlegames.
  Some months ago I started analysing the games of Ulf Andersson and fell in love with the English Opening. I am wondering if there are black openings who are similar.
  
  My current repertoire looks like this:
  
  • White: English
  
  • Black: Caro-Kann (vs. 1.e4) and Nimzo/QID (vs. 1. d4)
  
  Some info on what I like in the English and in general:
  
  1. My preferred way to win is getting a small advantage and converting into a winning endgame. I love endgames.
  2. I really like playing against structural weaknesses.
  3. I do enjoy queenless middlegames.
  4. I like quiet games with time to maneuver and frequently employ a double fianchetto as white.
  
  **Tags:** opening, english-opening, repertoire
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Have you looked into `1.e4 e5`? The most critical line will probably be the Berlin Defense, which fits your description perfectly. However, there is a lot of theory including gambits that you should be prepared for. I wonder if you gave this any consideration.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2020-03-24. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  The reality is that you cannot force such openings as black, but you can pick openings that may suit your style.
  
  I really think that the Nimzo-Indian/Queens-Indian may suit your style very well. They will not get you queenless positions too often right out of the opening, but the nature of the Nc3 in the Nimzo, and it often getting exchanged resulting in doubled pawns for white, you will get a lot of strategically complex positions that have structural weaknesses to work against (usually in exchange for the bishop pair), and there is often a lot of maneuvering. In the Queens-Indian, you get the fianchettoed bishop you like, and nice control over e4, which allows you to try and chip away as the white center. I have also gotten a number of nice kingside attacks too against the white Kg1.
  
  This has been my bread and butter opening pair as black against 1.d4 for decades, and I like the type of positions that you like. The theory is old now, but if you can get a hold of the book "[Understanding the Queens Indian Defense](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0890580510)" on eBay, it does a great job of teaching the underlying ideas. You can also study Karpov's games, as this was his main weapon as black during his peak years.
  
  In the Nimzo take this famous game in the Huebner variation of the Nimzo. Of course, there are many variations, and you would have to learn more than just the Huebner.
  
  ```
   [Event "World-ch27 Fischer-Spassky +7-3=11"]
   [Site "Reykjavik"]
   [Date "1972.07.20"]
   [Round "5"]
   [White "Spassky, Boris Vasilievich"]
   [Black "Fischer, Robert James"]
   [Result "0-1"]
   [ECO "E41"]
   [BlackElo "2785"]
   [PlyCount "54"]
   [EventDate "1972.07.11"]
   [EventType "match"]
   [EventRounds "21"]
   [EventCountry "ISL"]
   [FEN ""]
  
   1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 c5 5. e3 Nc6 6. Bd3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 d6 8. e4 e5 9. d5 Ne7 10. Nh4 h6 11. f4 Ng6 12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Be3 b6 15. O-O O-O 16. a4 a5 17. Rb1 Bd7 18. Rb2 Rb8 19. Rbf2 Qe7 20. Bc2 g5 21. Bd2 Qe8 22. Be1 Qg6 23. Qd3 Nh5 24. Rxf8+ Rxf8 25. Rxf8+ Kxf8 26. Bd1 Nf4 27. Qc2 Bxa4 0-1
  
  ```
  
  
  ---
  
  