Answers.Body: <p>I was not sure that I could answer this question because there are so many non-standard types of positions in the Winawer, and it covers entire books. I am primarily going to discuss the famous main line, and what its basic ideas are for both sides.</p>
  
  <p>The main line is where white plays an early Qg4, and attacks the black kingside. The main ideas for both sides in their simplest forms are that white is trying to take on g7 and h7, and eventually queen the h-pawn...simplistic, but accurate, but nevertheless, a long way from fruition.</p>
  
  <p>In the meantime, black is playing to rip apart the center with c5, cxd4/dxc3, castle long, and take on e5, sometimes via a sacrifice (with the queen on c7 and after f4 by white) to attack the white king, which is usually stranded in the center. After this potential sacrifice, there may also be tactical ideas against the wayward white queen trapping it. If black can open the center successfully, and make the center pawns count by advancing them, and using the center to open lines to the white king, the white king will not be safe and often perish. Obviously, this general plan is VERY tactical, and requires a lot of book knowledge, and calculation during the game once you have left book. This main line is so sharp (even the description sounds sharp) that there are not a lot more generalities that I can add since they are very specific to the positions that arise.</p>
  
  <p>The problem is what happens when white, and this happens a lot at lower levels, decides not to play into that mainline scheme because of being afraid of theory? There is too much here, and goes beyond the scope of one SE question. That leaves a lot of different possibilities from not playing either e5 (Anti-Winawer with cxd5, Bd3, or even Qd3 among others) or a3 (Semi-Winawer with Bd2 primarily) at all, to exchanging on d5, which bring up radically different plans. White can also play positionally with Nf4 and a4.</p>
  
  <p>Instead of 4...c5, you can also opt for 4...Ne7, which aims for a more closed game, and to avoid the sharpest lines, but I tend to think that black does well playing the main line.</p>
  
  <p>As I looked at my library, and looked up books specifically on the Winawer, I found two books that I would recommend.</p>
  
  <p>I do not own this book, but based on the Amazon "Look Inside" feature, it is one of the most impressive opening books I have ever seen in terms of spelling out the ideas, especially in a complicated opening:</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/9056913271" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">"The Wonderful Winawer: Strategic Ideas &amp; Surprise Weapons for Dynamic Chess Players"</a> by GM Viktor Moskalenko</p>
  
  <p>The second book, <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0805039066" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">"Winning With the French"</a>, and I do own this one, is by GM Wolfgang Uhlmann, who was probably THE authority on the French during his peak years, and never played anything but the French in response to 1.e4 during his career (or so they say). The book is exclusively taken from 60 of his games, and the explanations are very good, but watching how a master of this opening handles it will be invaluable.</p>
  
  <p>Lastly, I also suggest studying the games of Viktor Kortchnoi, another noted expert on the French.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-16T14:51:51.673Z
Answers.Text: A great response, PhishMaster, thank you very much!
Answers.UserDisplayName: lafinur
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-11T12:32:07.677Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-11T12:32:07.677Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>Since the question is posed very generally, I'll only give a rough overview of some of the more typical ideas behind the Winawer for black. I'll mostly focus on positions after <code>4.e5</code> as that is the key line allowing white to fight for an advantage out of the opening. </p>
  
  <p>It must be noted that the ideas tend to vary somewhat greatly depending on which specific variation of the Winawer we consider, as there are quite different ways the opening can continue after <code>1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5</code>, namely:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>The advance variation with <code>4...c5,</code></li>
  <li>The other advance variation with <code>4...Ne7</code>,</li>
  <li>The Petrosian variation with <code>4...Qd7</code>, etc.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/DEtmt.jpg" width="250" height="250"></p>
  
  <p>Let's start with <code>4...c5,</code> and consider the following typical position of the Winawer, arising after <code>5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3:</code></p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/IupFV.jpg" width="250" height="250"> </p>
  
  <h2>Strategic assessment:</h2>
  
  <ul>
  <li>First of, black has willingly decided to give up their dark-squared bishop, so white has the bishop pair. </li>
  <li>In turn, this has allowed black to damage white's pawn structure.</li>
  <li>In particular, the pawn structure favours black in the endgame thanks to white's isolated <code>a-pawn</code> and the doubled <code>c-pawns.</code></li>
  <li>Although black is clearly behind in space control, the central pawn structure makes it very difficult for white to actually open up the position. The position remaining closed favours black as white has the bishop pair and is getting their pieces more effectively developed than black is able to. </li>
  <li>Black's main two weaknesses are: the <code>c8</code> bishop having no simple prospect of getting effectively developed, and the highly weakened kingside caused by giving up the <code>f8</code> bishop and the inability to establish the kingside knight on the ideal <code>f6</code> square, which is prevented by white's early <code>e5.</code></li>
  <li>The two aforementioned aspects are what makes the advance variation with <code>4.e5</code> favourable for white, as these weaknesses offer white a tangible and concrete edge to play with. </li>
  <li>From black's perspective, these difficulties in parrying a kingside attack or finishing development effectively means, on the one hand, black has to be ready to opt for dynamic remedies to solve their problems, such as the poisoned <code>g7-pawn</code> continuation to answer white's early <code>Qg4.</code> On the other hand, black has to know and recognise a lot of positional combinations in order to defend against white's various attacking options. These combinations are typically in the form of very subtle manoeuvres that at first glance appear to completely undermine all opening principles. </li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>With that, let's have a look at some of these subtleties you need to be definitely aware of when playing the Winawer. To understand their necessity, we must first develop a feel for where white's best attacking chances lie. Consider again the following typical structure, but this time after black's best move 6th move, <code>6...Ne7:</code></p>
  
  <h2>White has three main <em>active</em> continuations here:</h2>
  
  <ul>
  <li><code>7.a4:</code> with the idea to develop the <code>c1</code> bishop to <code>a3</code> and quickly exert pressure on black's dark-square weaknesses. </li>
  <li><code>7.h4:</code> a quick advance on the kingside to either play <code>h5</code> (often followed by <code>g4</code>) to boot black's <code>e7</code>  knight from the key light-square posts <code>g6-f5.</code> Additionally, advancing the pawn to <code>h6</code> is also possible, to either damage black's pawn structure after <code>gxh6</code> or to further weaken the dark-squares after <code>g6.</code></li>
  <li><code>7.Qg4:</code> immediately exploiting black's weakened kingside and in particular the undefended <code>g7</code> pawn.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/wWcTi.jpg" width="250" height="250"></p>
  
  <h2>Important typical manoeuvres for black:</h2>
  
  <p>To prevent an early <code>7.a4</code>, black has the option to play <code>6...Qa5</code> (instead of <code>6...Ne7</code>) with tempo as <code>c3</code> is attacked, with the idea to block next the <code>a-pawn</code> with <code>Qa4!</code> Indeed this looks dubious at first as the queen is being used as a blockader, but in fact on top of the blockade, the black queen is also well-established for creating counter-attacks on the queenside and in the center. </p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/hO8vg.jpg" width="250" height="250"></p>
  
  <p>After <code>6...Ne7,</code> in reply to white's <code>7.Qg4</code>, as opposed to the more risky lines with <code>7...O-O,</code> black has the option of playing the Poisoned Pawn variation, which after <code>7...Nbc6</code> entails: Sacrificing the <code>g7</code> pawn for a quicker development, queenside castling, and dynamic play:</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/LT6jL.jpg" width="250" height="250"></p>
  
  <p>A typical continuation is: </p>
  
  <pre><code> [title "Poisoned Pawn Variation:"]
   [fen ""]
   [startply "13"]
  
   1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Qg4 Nbc6 8. Qxg7 Rg8 9. Qxh7 cxd4 10. Ne2 Qc7 11. f4 dxc3 12. Qd3 d4 13. Nxd4 Nxd4 14. Qxd4 Bd7 15. Rg1 Nf5 16. Qf2 {black is a pawn down but has decent positional compensation thanks to white's compromised king position, the well-established knight on f5 and the white's g2 pawn against which black can continue to mount pressure with Qc6-Qd5-Bc6.}
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>The Petrosian variation starting from <code>4...Qd7</code> (instead of <code>4...c5</code>) looks really dubious at first since: we're developing our queen by blocking our own bishop, and even before having developped our minor pieces. But in fact, <code>Qd7</code> is a really useful <strong>multi-purpose</strong> move: it prevents <code>Bb5+</code> and prepared to trade the light-square bishops with <code>b6-Ba6</code> and it indirectly defends the <code>g7</code> pawn against <code>Qg4.</code> Since with the queen on <code>d7</code>, <code>Qg4</code> can be replied with <code>f5</code>, a <em>discovered defense</em> if you will :)</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/P38GJ.jpg" width="250" height="250"></p>
  
  <p>And the list goes on... But you see the pattern behind these subtleties: they are all backed by highly concrete ideas and thus, far from a mere application of opening principles. These are things you need to take into account if you really want to adopt playing the Winawer, these systems are not everyone's cup of tea.</p>
  
  <hr>
  
  <h2>Summarised notes</h2>
  
  <p>Again, this was simply a rough overview, attempting to bring to your attention the kinds of positions and manoeuvres you need to get yourself accustomed to if you want to start playing the Winawer. Let's finish by summarising mostly black's trumps in the Winawer:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Black ensures the center remains closed with early trade on <code>c3</code> leading to the typical pawn structure of <code>c2-c3-d4-e5</code> for white and <code>(c5)-d5-e6</code> for black. White has the lead in space and has the bishop pair, so it's vital to keep the position closed, unless a liquidation is possible.</li>
  <li>The early trade on <code>c3</code> gives black, statically, the better pawn structure and it leaves white with an isolated <code>a-pawn</code> and doubled <code>c-pawns.</code> Thus, typically, early liquidations towards an endgame are better for black, but of course white should not allow that.</li>
  <li>With all of white's central pawns fixed on dark-squares, black can undermine the pawn chain with <code>c5</code> and can easily mount further pressure on <code>c3</code> and <code>d4</code> pawns (moves such as <code>Nbc6, Ne7-Nf5, Qb6, Qa5</code>).</li>
  <li>However, dark-squares can also easily be black's undoing in the Winawer, specially, if black is unable to create a clear counter-play and white manages to force further dark-square weaknesses on the kingside, then white's queen and dark-squared bishop coordination can become dominant and decisive. See e.g. <a href="https://lichess.org/mMHaCooj" rel="noreferrer">Hou Yifan's instructive win against Kramnik in the Winawer</a>, an absolute dark-square domination.</li>
  <li>As for instance advertised in the Poisoned pawn variation, black commonly has the option of also castling queenside to finish development, and play actively.</li>
  <li>Black's main worries in the Winawer are: how to <strong>parry the induced dark-square weaknesses</strong>, and how to complete development, in particular, <strong>the king position and the locked out <code>c8</code> bishop</strong>. If white plays passively early on, and allows you to comfortably resolve these, then you'll have equalised, if not even a bit better because of the pawn structure.</li>
  <li>Exploit white's exposed queenside in order to create counter-play by targeting white's pawns, in particular the <code>a4</code> square, which if occupied by either the <code>c8</code> (<code>Bd7-Ba4</code>) bishop or queen (<code>Qa5-Qa4</code>), <code>c2</code> can be targeted and more importantly black prevents the <code>a4-Ba3</code> setup for white as discussed earlier.</li>
  <li>Also note that lines where white sacrifices their <code>e4</code> pawn do not really work, and you need to be ready to refute them. For instance, after <code>1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3</code>, (instead of <code>e5</code>), black stands even slightly better after: <code>4...Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 dxe4 6. Qg4 Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8.</code> Similarly for <code>4.Ne2</code>, which allows black to comfortably equalise: <code>4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Be7 6. Nxe4 Nf6</code>.</li>
  <li>As a whole, the Winawer can be a very dynamic weapon to play for a win as it can lead to highly imbalanced positions and still bears some hanging fruits to be discovered.</li>
  <li>As a general recommendation for learning about ideas underlying a specific opening, make sure to spend a lot of time studying games of experts of the opening you're interested in. Look into the games of for example, <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&amp;year=&amp;playercomp=black&amp;pid=&amp;player=Bronstein&amp;pid2=&amp;player2=&amp;movescomp=exactly&amp;moves=&amp;opening=&amp;eco=C16&amp;result=" rel="noreferrer">D. Bronstein</a>, <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=14075&amp;playercomp=black&amp;eco=C16" rel="noreferrer">Y. Seirawan</a>, <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?playercomp=black&amp;pid=16149&amp;eco=C16&amp;title=Petrosian%20playing%20French,%20Winawer%20(C16)%20as%20Black%20" rel="noreferrer">T.V. Petrosian</a>, <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&amp;year=&amp;playercomp=black&amp;pid=&amp;player=smyslov&amp;pid2=&amp;player2=&amp;movescomp=exactly&amp;moves=&amp;opening=&amp;eco=C16&amp;result=" rel="noreferrer">V. Smyslov</a>, <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&amp;year=&amp;playercomp=black&amp;pid=&amp;player=caruana&amp;pid2=&amp;player2=&amp;movescomp=exactly&amp;moves=&amp;opening=&amp;eco=C16&amp;result=" rel="noreferrer">F. Caruana</a> and <a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&amp;year=&amp;playercomp=black&amp;pid=&amp;player=zhukova&amp;pid2=&amp;player2=&amp;movescomp=exactly&amp;moves=&amp;opening=C15-C19&amp;eco=&amp;result=" rel="noreferrer">N. Zhukova</a>. </li>
  </ul>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-16T14:51:35.940Z
Answers.Text: A very complete response, thank you very much Phonon!
Answers.UserDisplayName: lafinur
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-03-11T14:14:13.793Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-11T14:14:13.793Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ellie
Body: <p>I am beginning to study the Winawer variation (<code>1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4</code>), mainly because the only line I actually know against <code>3.Nc3</code> is the Rubinstein (<code>3...dxe4</code>), which is very dry and boring to my taste. </p>
  
  <p>I have studied the main line, and I'm beginning to appreciate the key ideas of the Winawer, but still I would like to ask to more experienced <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Defence" rel="nofollow noreferrer">French defense</a> players what are the key ideas, notes and/or concepts I should keep in mind while studying (and playing!) this sharp variation? This will make me study with better fundamentals and play with more precision, I hope.</p>
  
Tags: <opening><strategy><french-defense><winawer-variation>
Title: French defense: Key ideas on the Winawer
ThreadText: # French defense: Key ideas on the Winawer
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-11)
  
  I am beginning to study the Winawer variation (`1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4`), mainly because the only line I actually know against `3.Nc3` is the Rubinstein (`3...dxe4`), which is very dry and boring to my taste.
  
  I have studied the main line, and I'm beginning to appreciate the key ideas of the Winawer, but still I would like to ask to more experienced [French defense](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Defence) players what are the key ideas, notes and/or concepts I should keep in mind while studying (and playing!) this sharp variation? This will make me study with better fundamentals and play with more precision, I hope.
  
  **Tags:** opening, strategy, french-defense, winawer-variation
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2020-03-11. Score: 8 | Accepted answer
  
  Since the question is posed very generally, I'll only give a rough overview of some of the more typical ideas behind the Winawer for black. I'll mostly focus on positions after `4.e5` as that is the key line allowing white to fight for an advantage out of the opening.
  
  It must be noted that the ideas tend to vary somewhat greatly depending on which specific variation of the Winawer we consider, as there are quite different ways the opening can continue after `1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5`, namely:
  
  * The advance variation with `4...c5,`
  * The other advance variation with `4...Ne7`,
  * The Petrosian variation with `4...Qd7`, etc.
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/DEtmt.jpg)
  
  Let's start with `4...c5,` and consider the following typical position of the Winawer, arising after `5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3:`
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/IupFV.jpg)
  
  ## Strategic assessment:
  
  * First of, black has willingly decided to give up their dark-squared bishop, so white has the bishop pair.
  * In turn, this has allowed black to damage white's pawn structure.
  * In particular, the pawn structure favours black in the endgame thanks to white's isolated `a-pawn` and the doubled `c-pawns.`
  * Although black is clearly behind in space control, the central pawn structure makes it very difficult for white to actually open up the position. The position remaining closed favours black as white has the bishop pair and is getting their pieces more effectively developed than black is able to.
  * Black's main two weaknesses are: the `c8` bishop having no simple prospect of getting effectively developed, and the highly weakened kingside caused by giving up the `f8` bishop and the inability to establish the kingside knight on the ideal `f6` square, which is prevented by white's early `e5.`
  * The two aforementioned aspects are what makes the advance variation with `4.e5` favourable for white, as these weaknesses offer white a tangible and concrete edge to play with.
  * From black's perspective, these difficulties in parrying a kingside attack or finishing development effectively means, on the one hand, black has to be ready to opt for dynamic remedies to solve their problems, such as the poisoned `g7-pawn` continuation to answer white's early `Qg4.` On the other hand, black has to know and recognise a lot of positional combinations in order to defend against white's various attacking options. These combinations are typically in the form of very subtle manoeuvres that at first glance appear to completely undermine all opening principles.
  
  With that, let's have a look at some of these subtleties you need to be definitely aware of when playing the Winawer. To understand their necessity, we must first develop a feel for where white's best attacking chances lie. Consider again the following typical structure, but this time after black's best move 6th move, `6...Ne7:`
  
  ## White has three main *active* continuations here:
  
  * `7.a4:` with the idea to develop the `c1` bishop to `a3` and quickly exert pressure on black's dark-square weaknesses.
  * `7.h4:` a quick advance on the kingside to either play `h5` (often followed by `g4`) to boot black's `e7` knight from the key light-square posts `g6-f5.` Additionally, advancing the pawn to `h6` is also possible, to either damage black's pawn structure after `gxh6` or to further weaken the dark-squares after `g6.`
  * `7.Qg4:` immediately exploiting black's weakened kingside and in particular the undefended `g7` pawn.
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/wWcTi.jpg)
  
  ## Important typical manoeuvres for black:
  
  To prevent an early `7.a4`, black has the option to play `6...Qa5` (instead of `6...Ne7`) with tempo as `c3` is attacked, with the idea to block next the `a-pawn` with `Qa4!` Indeed this looks dubious at first as the queen is being used as a blockader, but in fact on top of the blockade, the black queen is also well-established for creating counter-attacks on the queenside and in the center.
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/hO8vg.jpg)
  
  After `6...Ne7,` in reply to white's `7.Qg4`, as opposed to the more risky lines with `7...O-O,` black has the option of playing the Poisoned Pawn variation, which after `7...Nbc6` entails: Sacrificing the `g7` pawn for a quicker development, queenside castling, and dynamic play:
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/LT6jL.jpg)
  
  A typical continuation is:
  
  ```
   [title "Poisoned Pawn Variation:"]
   [fen ""]
   [startply "13"]
  
   1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Qg4 Nbc6 8. Qxg7 Rg8 9. Qxh7 cxd4 10. Ne2 Qc7 11. f4 dxc3 12. Qd3 d4 13. Nxd4 Nxd4 14. Qxd4 Bd7 15. Rg1 Nf5 16. Qf2 {black is a pawn down but has decent positional compensation thanks to white's compromised king position, the well-established knight on f5 and the white's g2 pawn against which black can continue to mount pressure with Qc6-Qd5-Bc6.}
  
  ```
  
  The Petrosian variation starting from `4...Qd7` (instead of `4...c5`) looks really dubious at first since: we're developing our queen by blocking our own bishop, and even before having developped our minor pieces. But in fact, `Qd7` is a really useful **multi-purpose** move: it prevents `Bb5+` and prepared to trade the light-square bishops with `b6-Ba6` and it indirectly defends the `g7` pawn against `Qg4.` Since with the queen on `d7`, `Qg4` can be replied with `f5`, a *discovered defense* if you will :)
  
  ![](https://i.sstatic.net/P38GJ.jpg)
  
  And the list goes on... But you see the pattern behind these subtleties: they are all backed by highly concrete ideas and thus, far from a mere application of opening principles. These are things you need to take into account if you really want to adopt playing the Winawer, these systems are not everyone's cup of tea.
  
  ---
  
  ## Summarised notes
  
  Again, this was simply a rough overview, attempting to bring to your attention the kinds of positions and manoeuvres you need to get yourself accustomed to if you want to start playing the Winawer. Let's finish by summarising mostly black's trumps in the Winawer:
  
  * Black ensures the center remains closed with early trade on `c3` leading to the typical pawn structure of `c2-c3-d4-e5` for white and `(c5)-d5-e6` for black. White has the lead in space and has the bishop pair, so it's vital to keep the position closed, unless a liquidation is possible.
  * The early trade on `c3` gives black, statically, the better pawn structure and it leaves white with an isolated `a-pawn` and doubled `c-pawns.` Thus, typically, early liquidations towards an endgame are better for black, but of course white should not allow that.
  * With all of white's central pawns fixed on dark-squares, black can undermine the pawn chain with `c5` and can easily mount further pressure on `c3` and `d4` pawns (moves such as `Nbc6, Ne7-Nf5, Qb6, Qa5`).
  * However, dark-squares can also easily be black's undoing in the Winawer, specially, if black is unable to create a clear counter-play and white manages to force further dark-square weaknesses on the kingside, then white's queen and dark-squared bishop coordination can become dominant and decisive. See e.g. [Hou Yifan's instructive win against Kramnik in the Winawer](https://lichess.org/mMHaCooj), an absolute dark-square domination.
  * As for instance advertised in the Poisoned pawn variation, black commonly has the option of also castling queenside to finish development, and play actively.
  * Black's main worries in the Winawer are: how to **parry the induced dark-square weaknesses**, and how to complete development, in particular, **the king position and the locked out `c8` bishop**. If white plays passively early on, and allows you to comfortably resolve these, then you'll have equalised, if not even a bit better because of the pawn structure.
  * Exploit white's exposed queenside in order to create counter-play by targeting white's pawns, in particular the `a4` square, which if occupied by either the `c8` (`Bd7-Ba4`) bishop or queen (`Qa5-Qa4`), `c2` can be targeted and more importantly black prevents the `a4-Ba3` setup for white as discussed earlier.
  * Also note that lines where white sacrifices their `e4` pawn do not really work, and you need to be ready to refute them. For instance, after `1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3`, (instead of `e5`), black stands even slightly better after: `4...Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 dxe4 6. Qg4 Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8.` Similarly for `4.Ne2`, which allows black to comfortably equalise: `4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Be7 6. Nxe4 Nf6`.
  * As a whole, the Winawer can be a very dynamic weapon to play for a win as it can lead to highly imbalanced positions and still bears some hanging fruits to be discovered.
  * As a general recommendation for learning about ideas underlying a specific opening, make sure to spend a lot of time studying games of experts of the opening you're interested in. Look into the games of for example, [D. Bronstein](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&year=&playercomp=black&pid=&player=Bronstein&pid2=&player2=&movescomp=exactly&moves=&opening=&eco=C16&result=), [Y. Seirawan](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=14075&playercomp=black&eco=C16), [T.V. Petrosian](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?playercomp=black&pid=16149&eco=C16&title=Petrosian%20playing%20French,%20Winawer%20(C16)%20as%20Black%20), [V. Smyslov](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&year=&playercomp=black&pid=&player=smyslov&pid2=&player2=&movescomp=exactly&moves=&opening=&eco=C16&result=), [F. Caruana](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&year=&playercomp=black&pid=&player=caruana&pid2=&player2=&movescomp=exactly&moves=&opening=&eco=C16&result=) and [N. Zhukova](https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&year=&playercomp=black&pid=&player=zhukova&pid2=&player2=&movescomp=exactly&moves=&opening=C15-C19&eco=&result=).
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: A very complete response, thank you very much Phonon!  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-03-11. Score: 2
  
  I was not sure that I could answer this question because there are so many non-standard types of positions in the Winawer, and it covers entire books. I am primarily going to discuss the famous main line, and what its basic ideas are for both sides.
  
  The main line is where white plays an early Qg4, and attacks the black kingside. The main ideas for both sides in their simplest forms are that white is trying to take on g7 and h7, and eventually queen the h-pawn...simplistic, but accurate, but nevertheless, a long way from fruition.
  
  In the meantime, black is playing to rip apart the center with c5, cxd4/dxc3, castle long, and take on e5, sometimes via a sacrifice (with the queen on c7 and after f4 by white) to attack the white king, which is usually stranded in the center. After this potential sacrifice, there may also be tactical ideas against the wayward white queen trapping it. If black can open the center successfully, and make the center pawns count by advancing them, and using the center to open lines to the white king, the white king will not be safe and often perish. Obviously, this general plan is VERY tactical, and requires a lot of book knowledge, and calculation during the game once you have left book. This main line is so sharp (even the description sounds sharp) that there are not a lot more generalities that I can add since they are very specific to the positions that arise.
  
  The problem is what happens when white, and this happens a lot at lower levels, decides not to play into that mainline scheme because of being afraid of theory? There is too much here, and goes beyond the scope of one SE question. That leaves a lot of different possibilities from not playing either e5 (Anti-Winawer with cxd5, Bd3, or even Qd3 among others) or a3 (Semi-Winawer with Bd2 primarily) at all, to exchanging on d5, which bring up radically different plans. White can also play positionally with Nf4 and a4.
  
  Instead of 4...c5, you can also opt for 4...Ne7, which aims for a more closed game, and to avoid the sharpest lines, but I tend to think that black does well playing the main line.
  
  As I looked at my library, and looked up books specifically on the Winawer, I found two books that I would recommend.
  
  I do not own this book, but based on the Amazon "Look Inside" feature, it is one of the most impressive opening books I have ever seen in terms of spelling out the ideas, especially in a complicated opening:
  
  ["The Wonderful Winawer: Strategic Ideas & Surprise Weapons for Dynamic Chess Players"](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/9056913271) by GM Viktor Moskalenko
  
  The second book, ["Winning With the French"](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0805039066), and I do own this one, is by GM Wolfgang Uhlmann, who was probably THE authority on the French during his peak years, and never played anything but the French in response to 1.e4 during his career (or so they say). The book is exclusively taken from 60 of his games, and the explanations are very good, but watching how a master of this opening handles it will be invaluable.
  
  Lastly, I also suggest studying the games of Viktor Kortchnoi, another noted expert on the French.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: A great response, username_1, thank you very much!  
  
  ---
  
  