Answers.Body: <p>If you're going to take on c4, wait until White's moved his light-squared bishop. This forces White to waste a tempo taking back since he'll be moving the bishop twice. So in that position, what Stockfish says to do is fine. After taking, you'd aim to follow up with ...c5 soon, with the aim of liquidating the centre.</p>
  
  <p>That being said, you don't have to take on c4 in the first place. Another move in the position you posted is playing 6...b6, stopping any c5 ideas from White and preparing to push ...c5 yourself. A sample line:</p>
  
  <p>6...b6 7.0-0 Bb7 8.Nc3 Nbd7 9.b3 c5! with a level position.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-07-12T20:27:37.980Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-07-12T20:27:37.980Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.Body: <p>I agree with Ywapom's answer. Will only add that it's better to keep the tension for a while and only take once you think white can favorably go c4-c5 or cxd5. Thus I'd prefer going ...c5 first and only later taking on c4.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-07-10T23:58:34.240Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-07-10T23:58:34.240Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: John Smith
Answers.Body: <p>It is really a matter of taste over "better".  I like the tempo gain that dxc4 gives.  Usually the pawn is on c4 before Bf1-d3, but when Bf1 develops, as in your game, it loses time capturing on c4.  Additionally, the Bishop sucks on c4 and will likely move yet again.
  Black will have time to play c5 with a nice game.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-07-10T21:55:12.260Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-07-10T21:55:12.260Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ywapom
Body: <p>I always encounter such a position:</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
  [StartPly "11"]
  
  1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. h3 Nf6 4. e3 Be7 5. Bd3 O-O 6. c4 Nbd7 7. c5 c6 8. b4 b6 9. Bd2 a5 10. bxa5 bxa5 11. O-O Ne4 12. Bxe4 dxe4 13. Nh2 Nf6 14. Qe1 a4 15. Bb4 Ba6 16. Nc3 Bxf1 17. Nxf1 Rb8 18. a3 Ra8 19. Qd1 Qc7 20. Nxa4 Rfd8 21. Nb6 Ra7 22. Nd2 Nd5 23. Nxe4 Nxb4 24. axb4 Rxa1 25. Qxa1 f5 26. Nc3 Bf6 27. Qa2 Kf7 28. g3 g6 29. Kg2 Qb7 30. Ne2 Qc7 31. Nf4 Rb8 32. Qxe6+ Kg7 33. g4 fxg4 34. hxg4 Bxd4 35. exd4 Qxf4 36. Qd7+ Kh6 37. f3 Qd2+ 38. Kg3 Qxb4 39. Kf4 Rf8+ 40. Kg3 Qe1+ 41. Kg2 Qe2+ 42. Kg1 Rxf3 43. Qxc6 Rf1#
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Stockfish recommends 6.. dxc4, while I played Nbd7. Why makes dxc4 better? </p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-07-11T07:53:38.987Z
Comments.Text: The decision whether to take 6....dxc4 seems like small potatoes to me. How much difference can it make, this early in the game. I wish you had asked about some more interesting decision, like what are the advantages of 10...bxa5 over 10...bxc5, or was it really a good idea to sacrifice your bishop for the white rook at move 16.
Comments.UserDisplayName: bof
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-09-29T00:02:31.703Z
Comments.Text: Both moves are completely fine.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Tags: <opening><queens-gambit>
Title: When should I take on c4?
ThreadText: # When should I take on c4?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-10)
  
  I always encounter such a position:
  
  ```
  [FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
  [StartPly "11"]
  
  1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. h3 Nf6 4. e3 Be7 5. Bd3 O-O 6. c4 Nbd7 7. c5 c6 8. b4 b6 9. Bd2 a5 10. bxa5 bxa5 11. O-O Ne4 12. Bxe4 dxe4 13. Nh2 Nf6 14. Qe1 a4 15. Bb4 Ba6 16. Nc3 Bxf1 17. Nxf1 Rb8 18. a3 Ra8 19. Qd1 Qc7 20. Nxa4 Rfd8 21. Nb6 Ra7 22. Nd2 Nd5 23. Nxe4 Nxb4 24. axb4 Rxa1 25. Qxa1 f5 26. Nc3 Bf6 27. Qa2 Kf7 28. g3 g6 29. Kg2 Qb7 30. Ne2 Qc7 31. Nf4 Rb8 32. Qxe6+ Kg7 33. g4 fxg4 34. hxg4 Bxd4 35. exd4 Qxf4 36. Qd7+ Kh6 37. f3 Qd2+ 38. Kg3 Qxb4 39. Kf4 Rf8+ 40. Kg3 Qe1+ 41. Kg2 Qe2+ 42. Kg1 Rxf3 43. Qxc6 Rf1#
  
  ```
  
  Stockfish recommends 6.. dxc4, while I played Nbd7. Why makes dxc4 better?
  
  **Tags:** opening, queens-gambit
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: The decision whether to take 6....dxc4 seems like small potatoes to me. How much difference can it make, this early in the game. I wish you had asked about some more interesting decision, like what are the advantages of 10...bxa5 over 10...bxc5, or was it really a good idea to sacrifice your bishop for the white rook at move 16.  
  > **username_2**: Both moves are completely fine.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2018-07-10. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  It is really a matter of taste over "better". I like the tempo gain that dxc4 gives. Usually the pawn is on c4 before Bf1-d3, but when Bf1 develops, as in your game, it loses time capturing on c4. Additionally, the Bishop sucks on c4 and will likely move yet again.
  Black will have time to play c5 with a nice game.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2018-07-12. Score: 1
  
  If you're going to take on c4, wait until White's moved his light-squared bishop. This forces White to waste a tempo taking back since he'll be moving the bishop twice. So in that position, what Stockfish says to do is fine. After taking, you'd aim to follow up with ...c5 soon, with the aim of liquidating the centre.
  
  That being said, you don't have to take on c4 in the first place. Another move in the position you posted is playing 6...b6, stopping any c5 ideas from White and preparing to push ...c5 yourself. A sample line:
  
  6...b6 7.0-0 Bb7 8.Nc3 Nbd7 9.b3 c5! with a level position.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2018-07-10. Score: 1
  
  I agree with username_4's answer. Will only add that it's better to keep the tension for a while and only take once you think white can favorably go c4-c5 or cxd5. Thus I'd prefer going ...c5 first and only later taking on c4.
  
  
  ---
  
  