Answers.Body: <p>It's perfectly legal to take his knight and his two pawns, then promote all your five pawns, and mate him with rook and six queens. Watch out for stalemate, he must be able to move his king without going into check at all times.</p>
  
  <p>There are no rules saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-12-13T16:10:50.123Z
Answers.Text: "There are no rules saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces." Pins can prevent it. Although this is not going to happen in the OPs description of material. It cannot be said whether it is legal to take *any* pieces without seeing the position. I think this should be down voted. Sorry.
Answers.UserDisplayName: ezaspi
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-12-13T17:26:49.783Z
Answers.Text: There are no rules _specifically_ saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces. Of course you can't take a piece if, for example, it leaves you in check. That sort of exception isn't relevant to the OP's question.
Answers.UserDisplayName: dfan
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-12-16T23:58:15.507Z
Answers.Text: It's not clear what is relevant to the OPs question since we can't see the position. :)
Answers.UserDisplayName: ezaspi
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-12-13T13:48:04.530Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-12-13T13:48:04.530Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Body: <p>I play as white. I have a rook and queen and 5 pawns while the opponent has a knight and two pawns. I hope I can win this game. But, is it legal to take the knight in the next move? Then the opponent will have only two pawns with the King. Can I still play and win the game afterwards?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-12-13T13:01:27.100Z
Comments.Text: I don't see the position so this cannot be answered. Can you paste the FEN into your text at least? Or a pic would be better.
Comments.UserDisplayName: ezaspi
Tags: <rules>
Title: Can I still win if I take knight while the opponent has two pawns with king remained?
ThreadText: # Can I still win if I take knight while the opponent has two pawns with king remained?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2013-12-13)
  
  I play as white. I have a rook and queen and 5 pawns while the opponent has a knight and two pawns. I hope I can win this game. But, is it legal to take the knight in the next move? Then the opponent will have only two pawns with the King. Can I still play and win the game afterwards?
  
  **Tags:** rules
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: I don't see the position so this cannot be answered. Can you paste the FEN into your text at least? Or a pic would be better.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2013-12-13. Score: 6
  
  It's perfectly legal to take his knight and his two pawns, then promote all your five pawns, and mate him with rook and six queens. Watch out for stalemate, he must be able to move his king without going into check at all times.
  
  There are no rules saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: "There are no rules saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces." Pins can prevent it. Although this is not going to happen in the OPs description of material. It cannot be said whether it is legal to take *any* pieces without seeing the position. I think this should be down voted. Sorry.  
  > **username_3**: There are no rules _specifically_ saying you can't take any more of your opponent's pieces. Of course you can't take a piece if, for example, it leaves you in check. That sort of exception isn't relevant to the OP's question.  
  > **username_1**: It's not clear what is relevant to the OPs question since we can't see the position. :)  
  
  ---
  
  