Body: <p>Who are top-rated players (with 2600+ ELO) who are most notable in each of following styles?</p>
  
  <pre><code>Aggressive
  Positional
  Calculating
  Technical
  Practical
  Intuitive
  </code></pre>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:02:21.100Z
Comments.Text: This is hardly any different from your previous question.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Herb
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:03:54.767Z
Comments.Text: The question is similar (because I'm still looking for answers), but the format is different.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Bee
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:08:12.680Z
Comments.Text: If you think if there is anything wrong with the question, would you mind enlightening me? Appreciate it. I'm under the impression this is someplace where I can seek help from chess experts. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Bee
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:12:03.933Z
Comments.Text: You should be editing the previous question to make it on topic and a better fit, rather than asking it again in a different way.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Herb
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:12:05.460Z
Comments.Text: @bhathiya: there is no objective way to say any given player has a certain style, and that list of "styles" looks pretty random.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:14:23.117Z
Comments.Text: There is a section in Yermolinsky's "The Road to Chess Improvement" where he describes how he carefully analyzed games by such famous grandmasters as Tal and Spassky -- and couldn't find significant differences in style between them. He concludes it was mostly journalists putting labels on players to improve their stories.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:16:14.320Z
Comments.Text: @RemcoGerlich: Thanks. Could you please help me to make the list complete, at least up to some level? I will try to find that book.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Bee
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-10-08T19:22:14.200Z
Comments.Text: No, I think it makes no sense to divide players into different "styles". Maybe you can divide them by their approach to opening preparation, but after the opening top players can't really be distinguished by their moves.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Tags: <style>
Title: Top-rated players in each style
ThreadText: # Top-rated players in each style
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2017-10-08)
  
  Who are top-rated players (with 2600+ ELO) who are most notable in each of following styles?
  
  ```
  Aggressive
  Positional
  Calculating
  Technical
  Practical
  Intuitive
  
  ```
  
  **Tags:** style
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: This is hardly any different from your previous question.  
  > **username_0**: The question is similar (because I'm still looking for answers), but the format is different.  
  > **username_0**: If you think if there is anything wrong with the question, would you mind enlightening me? Appreciate it. I'm under the impression this is someplace where I can seek help from chess experts. Please correct me if I'm wrong.  
  > **username_1**: You should be editing the previous question to make it on topic and a better fit, rather than asking it again in a different way.  
  > **username_2**: @bhathiya: there is no objective way to say any given player has a certain style, and that list of "styles" looks pretty random.  
  > **username_2**: There is a section in Yermolinsky's "The Road to Chess Improvement" where he describes how he carefully analyzed games by such famous grandmasters as Tal and Spassky -- and couldn't find significant differences in style between them. He concludes it was mostly journalists putting labels on players to improve their stories.  
  > **username_0**: @username_2: Thanks. Could you please help me to make the list complete, at least up to some level? I will try to find that book.  
  > **username_2**: No, I think it makes no sense to divide players into different "styles". Maybe you can divide them by their approach to opening preparation, but after the opening top players can't really be distinguished by their moves.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 0 answers
  
  