Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>So as soon as X resigns, Y resigns as well.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>If the arbiter can establish this then player X's resignation, coming first, ends the game and player Y wins:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>5.1.2 The game is won by the player whose opponent declares he resigns. This immediately ends the game.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>But suppose the resignation really is simultaneous? </p>
  
  <p>Such a real world case was considered by <em>Bozidar Kazic</em> in his book <em>The Chess Competitor's Handbook</em>. Player A moved an unmoved pawn forward two squares, realised that he had allowed a devastating en passant capture, and resigned. Meanwhile player B overlooked the en passant possibility, thought that he was getting mated, and resigned.</p>
  
  <p>The conclusion was that the resignation from player B took precedence because it was his turn to move.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T11:57:51.980Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-01T11:57:51.980Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Answers.Body: <p>From FIDE Handbook: </p>
  
  <p>Article 5: The completion of the game</p>
  
  <p>5.1
  b. The game is won by the player whose opponent declares he resigns. This immediately ends the game. </p>
  
  <p>So simultaneous resignation is not possible.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-14T03:25:49.260Z
Answers.Text: This doesn't answer the question. What if both of them say "resign" at the same time?
Answers.UserDisplayName: SmallChess
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-13T16:34:13.400Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-04-16T06:31:52.310Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-16T06:31:52.310Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Don
Answers.Body: <p>In such a hypothetical situation, I wouldn't be surprised if both players lose <em>and</em> will be eliminated from the tournament's results, thereby not qualifying for the consolation prize. It's entirely possible to classify their behaviour as unsportsmanlike and discrediting the game of chess, which is against the <a href="https://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=9&amp;view=category" rel="noreferrer">FIDE Code of Ethics</a>.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>2.2.10<br>
    In addition, disciplinary action in accordance with this Code of Ethics will be taken in cases of occurrences which cause the game of chess, FIDE or its federations to appear in an unjustifiable unfavorable light and in this way damage its reputation.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-15T04:32:43.870Z
Answers.Text: I wonder why resignation is not covered by something similar to 9.1.b.1. In a spirit of the law the player shall have no right to do anything (including resignation) until his clock is ticking.
Answers.UserDisplayName: user58697
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-11-11T20:14:23.803Z
Answers.Text: Then what if both player resign because of a misjudgement of the game? (Each player mistakenly thought he is losing.)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Zuriel
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-05T20:50:21.417Z
Answers.Text: If e.g. a player who needed to be somewhere else left a resignation note on the board because the opponent wasn't at the board, at the essentially same time as the opponent who was in a similar situation was telling the arbiter that he had to resign, could an arbiter resolve the game 1/2-1/2 if the game was taken longer than expected, and neither player was clearly winning, and it's unclear which action was actually taken first?  For a player to abandon a game because of real-world commitments would not strike me as unsportsmanlike unless the player started the game without an expectation...
Answers.UserDisplayName: supercat
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-05T20:50:31.323Z
Answers.Text: ...of completing it.
Answers.UserDisplayName: supercat
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-14T17:50:50.407Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-04-14T17:50:50.407Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Glorfindel
Body: <p>Let's say a tournament decides to have special consolation prizes for players who finish in the 20th, 30th, 40th, and 50th positions. It does this to give incentive to players to keep playing all rounds even if they don't have a chance of finishing in the top 10, who would get the normal prizes. </p>
  
  <p>Now suppose player X playing the last round calculates that if he now resigns, he finishes exactly 20th, so he resigns. However, his opponent Y calculates that if he resigns now, he finishes 30th. Both players have incentive to resign. So as soon as X resigns, Y resigns as well. </p>
  
  <p>So what is the result of the game? </p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-04-14T17:54:20.190Z
Comments.Text: @itub there is an online tournament that appears to have this policy - http://kunteonline.chessbase.in/kunte-online
Comments.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Tags: <rules><resigning>
Title: If both players simultaneously resign, what is the result of the game?
ThreadText: # If both players simultaneously resign, what is the result of the game?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-13)
  
  Let's say a tournament decides to have special consolation prizes for players who finish in the 20th, 30th, 40th, and 50th positions. It does this to give incentive to players to keep playing all rounds even if they don't have a chance of finishing in the top 10, who would get the normal prizes.
  
  Now suppose player X playing the last round calculates that if he now resigns, he finishes exactly 20th, so he resigns. However, his opponent Y calculates that if he resigns now, he finishes 30th. Both players have incentive to resign. So as soon as X resigns, Y resigns as well.
  
  So what is the result of the game?
  
  **Tags:** rules, resigning
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: @itub there is an online tournament that appears to have this policy - http://kunteonline.chessbase.in/kunte-online  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2017-04-14. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  In such a hypothetical situation, I wouldn't be surprised if both players lose *and* will be eliminated from the tournament's results, thereby not qualifying for the consolation prize. It's entirely possible to classify their behaviour as unsportsmanlike and discrediting the game of chess, which is against the [FIDE Code of Ethics](https://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=9&view=category).
  
  > 2.2.10  
  > In addition, disciplinary action in accordance with this Code of Ethics will be taken in cases of occurrences which cause the game of chess, FIDE or its federations to appear in an unjustifiable unfavorable light and in this way damage its reputation.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_5**: I wonder why resignation is not covered by something similar to 9.1.b.1. In a spirit of the law the player shall have no right to do anything (including resignation) until his clock is ticking.  
  > **username_6**: Then what if both player resign because of a misjudgement of the game? (Each player mistakenly thought he is losing.)  
  > **username_7**: If e.g. a player who needed to be somewhere else left a resignation note on the board because the opponent wasn't at the board, at the essentially same time as the opponent who was in a similar situation was telling the arbiter that he had to resign, could an arbiter resolve the game 1/2-1/2 if the game was taken longer than expected, and neither player was clearly winning, and it's unclear which action was actually taken first?  For a player to abandon a game because of real-world commitments would not strike me as unsportsmanlike unless the player started the game without an expectation...  
  > **username_7**: ...of completing it.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-01-01. Score: 8
  
  > So as soon as X resigns, Y resigns as well.
  
  If the arbiter can establish this then player X's resignation, coming first, ends the game and player Y wins:
  
  > 5.1.2 The game is won by the player whose opponent declares he resigns. This immediately ends the game.
  
  But suppose the resignation really is simultaneous?
  
  Such a real world case was considered by *Bozidar Kazic* in his book *The Chess Competitor's Handbook*. Player A moved an unmoved pawn forward two squares, realised that he had allowed a devastating en passant capture, and resigned. Meanwhile player B overlooked the en passant possibility, thought that he was getting mated, and resigned.
  
  The conclusion was that the resignation from player B took precedence because it was his turn to move.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2017-04-13. Score: 4
  
  From FIDE Handbook:
  
  Article 5: The completion of the game
  
  5.1
  b. The game is won by the player whose opponent declares he resigns. This immediately ends the game.
  
  So simultaneous resignation is not possible.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: This doesn't answer the question. What if both of them say "resign" at the same time?  
  
  ---
  
  