Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>you play a combination that is technically stronger since it forces mate, but it takes 8 moves, some of which are hard to see</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>If they're hard to see, <em>chances are that you've missed something as well</em>. Therefore, take the queen. You might miss the opportunity to finish the game in a beautiful way, but you can always save that for the post-mortem analysis.</p>
  
  <p>The only reason not to take it would be if you're low on time and are not sure you can finish off the game, even being a queen ahead. But I wonder how you would see the mate in 8 then :)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T15:45:27.683Z
Answers.Text: +1 That is my thought, exactly. Thank you for your thoughts.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T16:58:57.310Z
Answers.Text: long combination, wrong combination
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T17:12:58.547Z
Answers.Text: If you're low enough on time that *you* think you might not win, your opponent would likely think the same thing and not concede.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Acccumulation
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T15:43:29.150Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-01T15:46:01.533Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-01-01T15:46:01.533Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Glorfindel
Answers.Body: <p>It could be risky since you don't know what you have missed, but on the other hand, if you are low on the clock say under 10 minutes you might just have to go for the checkmate if the time control is also distant. Although playing while being a Queen up shouldn't be difficult even if you are a queen up.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-02T04:30:34.710Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-02T04:30:34.710Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: SubhanKhan
Body: <p>Let's say you have a position where you can win the opponent's queen in one move and you know he will resign; or you play a combination that is technically stronger since it forces mate, but it takes 8 moves, some of which are hard to see, so you do not think your opponent will resign on the spot.</p>
  
  <p>Which is really better?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T13:40:12.367Z
Comments.Text: Better for what? Winning the tournament or learning the game? And just to confirm you can definitely see this 8 move combo is absolutely 100% sound?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T14:55:19.433Z
Comments.Text: Depends on your definition of better. If you mean better according to a computer, then it's the forced mate (assuming your calculations don't have any mistakes). But if better means finishing an already won game in the minimal time, then maybe taking the queen if you think there's a good chance it will cause the opponent to resign soon.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T14:57:56.967Z
Comments.Text: Also @Brian Towers, the questions are different. This question assumes you already see a forced mate, and is wondering whether it's worth playing it. The other question is asking whether it's worthwhile to look for mates in the first place.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T15:28:01.013Z
Comments.Text: The question is TOTALLY different. You could certainly make a case for opinion, but virtually every question here is asking for an opinion since chess is not solved.
Comments.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-01T15:39:11.373Z
Comments.Text: @InertialIgnorance That is kind of what I am looking for. I have my thoughts on it (probably take the queen, and just end the game immediately), but I was curious about other people's thoughts.
Comments.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-02T00:37:41.197Z
Comments.Text: @PhishMaster There's also the matter of just playing the best chess you can. Performing an 8 move checkmate "enriches" the final part of the game in a way.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-02T01:11:37.170Z
Comments.Text: @InertialIgnoranceI I agree, and thus, my dilemma.
Comments.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Tags: <checkmate><queens><resigning><combinations>
Title: Which is better, going for checkmate, or forcing immediate resignation?
ThreadText: # Which is better, going for checkmate, or forcing immediate resignation?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-01-01)
  
  Let's say you have a position where you can win the opponent's queen in one move and you know he will resign; or you play a combination that is technically stronger since it forces mate, but it takes 8 moves, some of which are hard to see, so you do not think your opponent will resign on the spot.
  
  Which is really better?
  
  **Tags:** checkmate, queens, resigning, combinations
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Better for what? Winning the tournament or learning the game? And just to confirm you can definitely see this 8 move combo is absolutely 100% sound?  
  > **username_2**: Depends on your definition of better. If you mean better according to a computer, then it's the forced mate (assuming your calculations don't have any mistakes). But if better means finishing an already won game in the minimal time, then maybe taking the queen if you think there's a good chance it will cause the opponent to resign soon.  
  > **username_2**: Also @Brian Towers, the questions are different. This question assumes you already see a forced mate, and is wondering whether it's worth playing it. The other question is asking whether it's worthwhile to look for mates in the first place.  
  > **username_0**: The question is TOTALLY different. You could certainly make a case for opinion, but virtually every question here is asking for an opinion since chess is not solved.  
  > **username_0**: @username_2 That is kind of what I am looking for. I have my thoughts on it (probably take the queen, and just end the game immediately), but I was curious about other people's thoughts.  
  > **username_2**: @username_0 There's also the matter of just playing the best chess you can. Performing an 8 move checkmate "enriches" the final part of the game in a way.  
  > **username_0**: @InertialIgnoranceI I agree, and thus, my dilemma.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2020-01-01. Score: 5 | Accepted answer
  
  > you play a combination that is technically stronger since it forces mate, but it takes 8 moves, some of which are hard to see
  
  If they're hard to see, *chances are that you've missed something as well*. Therefore, take the queen. You might miss the opportunity to finish the game in a beautiful way, but you can always save that for the post-mortem analysis.
  
  The only reason not to take it would be if you're low on time and are not sure you can finish off the game, even being a queen ahead. But I wonder how you would see the mate in 8 then :)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: +1 That is my thought, exactly. Thank you for your thoughts.  
  > **username_4**: long combination, wrong combination  
  > **username_5**: If you're low enough on time that *you* think you might not win, your opponent would likely think the same thing and not concede.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2020-01-02. Score: 1
  
  It could be risky since you don't know what you have missed, but on the other hand, if you are low on the clock say under 10 minutes you might just have to go for the checkmate if the time control is also distant. Although playing while being a Queen up shouldn't be difficult even if you are a queen up.
  
  
  ---
  
  