Answers.Body: <p>If I understand well you had a king and a queen, and your opponent a king and a bishop.</p>
  
  <p>It is not a stalemate nor a draw, unless you reach a position like this one, for example:</p>
  
  <pre><code>[fen "8/8/8/8/8/6K1/8/5Qbk b - - 0 1"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>A stalemate occurs whenever the player having the turn has no legal moves and he's not under check.</p>
  
  <p>A draw happens when there's no sequence of legal moves (even if they are absurd ones) than can lead to a checkmate, when the same position is repeated at least three times, or when at least 50 moves have been done without a pawn move or a capture.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T18:50:56.947Z
Answers.Text: @AlwaysLearningNewStuff thanks for the edit! I was looking the site for help about inserting FEN and PGN diagrams and I could not find it
Answers.UserDisplayName: sharcashmo
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T19:18:35.040Z
Answers.Text: [This](http://meta.chess.stackexchange.com/questions/279/tool-used-to-create-chess-analysis-interactive-diagrams-in-many-chess-stack-exch/280#280) should help...
Answers.UserDisplayName: AlwaysLearningNewStuff
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-05-31T08:15:40.343Z
Answers.Text: That's a mate in 1, but perhaps you meant with black to move.
Answers.UserDisplayName: hkBst
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-05-31T09:40:11.210Z
Answers.Text: it's black to move, FEN has this information but the diagram doesn't show it
Answers.UserDisplayName: sharcashmo
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-10-13T05:27:45.580Z
Answers.Text: It might be better to set up the diagram with White to move, in a situation where Black's bishop has just forked white's king and queen, and where white's capture of the bishop would result in stalemate.  To be sure, capturing the bishop at that point wouldn't really be better or worse than anything else White could do, since alternatives that drop the queen would yield a draw anyway, but setting up a plausible move before a stalemate could improve the explanation.
Answers.UserDisplayName: supercat
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T18:47:15.993Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-22T18:21:00.740Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-03-22T18:21:00.740Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: sharcashmo
Body: <p>I'm new at chess and still learning the rules. The other day I was playing a friend of mine, and it got to the point where I had only my king and queen and he had only his king and bishop. I forgot the exactly how we got to this point, but when we did, he said it would be stalemate and result in a draw. I argued that we keep playing and I wound up putting him in checkmate. He didn't make any fatal or illegal moves; I just beat him. My question is, why would this be a draw if I could win? Everything I find says that when either side has only a king and bishop/knight it results in a draw. Of course I may have misunderstood, but it seems like one side can get punished for simply taking out the other sides pieces.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-06-22T14:21:29.537Z
Comments.Text: Although the question might have been worded a bit more clearly, the questioner indicated that he's new to the game. I noticed that it had 2 down-votes, so I've up-voted it in order to at least partly balance them. The question shows research on his part, is reasonable and useful for beginners, and is fairly clear.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Charles Rockafellor
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T18:42:23.730Z
Comments.Text: Your friend was wrong. You have every right to play on in this situation.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Dag Oskar Madsen
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T18:47:36.897Z
Comments.Text: Queen + king vs King + bishop is won endgame for the side with the queen. You have every right to play for a win.
Comments.UserDisplayName: AlwaysLearningNewStuff
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T19:31:32.537Z
Comments.Text: It's a draw when one side has only a king and bishop _and the other side has only a king_. Then checkmate isn't possible. In your case it obviously was.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-05-29T22:19:42.353Z
Comments.Text: You can win by force, but you have 50 moves in which to do it, unless a piece is captured or a (non-existent) pawn is moved, which resets to counter.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Tags: <rules><stalemate>
Title: Was this considered a stalemate?
ThreadText: # Was this considered a stalemate?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-05-29)
  
  I'm new at chess and still learning the rules. The other day I was playing a friend of mine, and it got to the point where I had only my king and queen and he had only his king and bishop. I forgot the exactly how we got to this point, but when we did, he said it would be stalemate and result in a draw. I argued that we keep playing and I wound up putting him in checkmate. He didn't make any fatal or illegal moves; I just beat him. My question is, why would this be a draw if I could win? Everything I find says that when either side has only a king and bishop/knight it results in a draw. Of course I may have misunderstood, but it seems like one side can get punished for simply taking out the other sides pieces.
  
  **Tags:** rules, stalemate
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: Your friend was wrong. You have every right to play on in this situation.  
  > **username_3**: Queen + king vs King + bishop is won endgame for the side with the queen. You have every right to play for a win.  
  > **username_4**: It's a draw when one side has only a king and bishop _and the other side has only a king_. Then checkmate isn't possible. In your case it obviously was.  
  > **username_5**: You can win by force, but you have 50 moves in which to do it, unless a piece is captured or a (non-existent) pawn is moved, which resets to counter.  
  > **username_1**: Although the question might have been worded a bit more clearly, the questioner indicated that he's new to the game. I noticed that it had 2 down-votes, so I've up-voted it in order to at least partly balance them. The question shows research on his part, is reasonable and useful for beginners, and is fairly clear.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2016-05-29. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  If I understand well you had a king and a queen, and your opponent a king and a bishop.
  
  It is not a stalemate nor a draw, unless you reach a position like this one, for example:
  
  ```
  [fen "8/8/8/8/8/6K1/8/5Qbk b - - 0 1"]
  
  ```
  
  A stalemate occurs whenever the player having the turn has no legal moves and he's not under check.
  
  A draw happens when there's no sequence of legal moves (even if they are absurd ones) than can lead to a checkmate, when the same position is repeated at least three times, or when at least 50 moves have been done without a pawn move or a capture.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_6**: @username_3 thanks for the edit! I was looking the site for help about inserting FEN and PGN diagrams and I could not find it  
  > **username_3**: [This](http://meta.chess.stackexchange.com/questions/279/tool-used-to-create-chess-analysis-interactive-diagrams-in-many-chess-stack-exch/280#280) should help...  
  > **username_7**: That's a mate in 1, but perhaps you meant with black to move.  
  > **username_6**: it's black to move, FEN has this information but the diagram doesn't show it  
  > **username_8**: It might be better to set up the diagram with White to move, in a situation where Black's bishop has just forked white's king and queen, and where white's capture of the bishop would result in stalemate.  To be sure, capturing the bishop at that point wouldn't really be better or worse than anything else White could do, since alternatives that drop the queen would yield a draw anyway, but setting up a plausible move before a stalemate could improve the explanation.  
  
  ---
  
  