Answers.Body: <p>Another reason why castling is good in 960 chess (and classical chess) is that it <strong>connects the rooks</strong>.</p>
  
  <p>In the following example, Black quickly castled and connected his rooks, while White did not. This is not the only reason for White's defeats, but it is part of it.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[fen "nqbbrkrn/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/NQBBRKRN w - - 0 1"]
  [title "Shankland - Vachier-Lagrave, Champions Showdown, Chess 960 2018"]
  
  1. d4 d5 2. c3 Ng6 3. Bc2 c6 4. Ng3 O-O 5. h4 f5 6. h5 f4 7. Nf5 e6 8. Nxg7 Kxg7 9. hxg6 e5 10. dxe5 h6 11. Nb3 Qxe5 12. Bd2 Nb6 13. Qd1 Nc4 14. Nd4 Ne3+! 15. Bxe3 fxe3 16. Nf3 exf2!! {Brillant sac of the Queen} 17. Nxe5 Bh4! {and mat follow soon} 18. g3 Bh3+ 19. Rg2 Bxg3! 0-1
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-05-15T18:50:02.357Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-05-15T18:50:02.357Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Kortchnoi
Answers.Body: <p>In <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/37082/how-many-chess960-positions-exist-in-which-castling-on-1-side-does-not-require-m">chess870</a>, the answer is that the principles of castling in regular chess still apply. This is similar to asking if you should still control the centre, develop knights before bishops, etc.</p>
  <p>What I haven't found to be discussed online (or even in <a href="https://www.chessable.com/the-ascent-wesley-sos-fischer-random-strategies-and-tactics/course/31697/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wesley So's chessable course</a>) however is for the <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/37082/how-many-chess960-positions-exist-in-which-castling-on-1-side-does-not-require-m">90 positions of chess960 where castling on one side requires moving (or removing by a capture) a rook on the other side</a>.</p>
  <p>Sure the principles still apply, but I haven't yet found some article or video that gives some examples explaining whether or not you should give up castling rights on 1 side by moving that side's rook in order to castle on the other side.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-11-05T15:57:17.020Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-11-05T15:57:17.020Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Answers.Body: <p>Yes, castling is good, especially when you are about to be attacked by say, a knight and queen, a king castling to the other side is very good. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-02-16T04:53:27.630Z
Answers.Text: I heard a guy say that there is no center o chess 960. If there is no fighting for control of the center, then most of the action is on the wings? Or the action can happen equally on the center and wings, except for positions where the bishops are on the wings?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Marcelo
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-30T05:38:29.560Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-30T05:50:16.490Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-01-30T05:50:16.490Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: vssher
Body: <p>The overall arrangement of the pieces in Chess960 seems so weird that I have a question about it: should there be castling at all?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-29T14:29:27.870Z
Comments.Text: The basic question is too broad, but he narrowed it a lot in the body. Reopen.
Comments.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-29T22:07:35.797Z
Comments.Text: @RewanDemontay You edited out precisely why I thought the question was OK...the narrowing of his basic premise. I want to edit it back some to include his supporting prose.
Comments.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-30T07:33:28.637Z
Comments.Text: The headline question is now very different from the one in the body of text. Which should I respond to?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Laska
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-30T07:39:42.250Z
Comments.Text: The headline question is not “too broad” (although I can understand the temptation to classify it like that, given that once it is hit with that description it is fair game for moderatorial blocking) any more than the question “is the pope catholic?” too broad. Instead, it’s a question where the answer is too obviously “yes” in most cases
Comments.UserDisplayName: Laska
Tags: <chess-variants><castling><chess960>
Title: Is castling good in Chess960?
ThreadText: # Is castling good in Chess960?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-01-29)
  
  The overall arrangement of the pieces in Chess960 seems so weird that I have a question about it: should there be castling at all?
  
  **Tags:** chess-variants, castling, chess960
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: The basic question is too broad, but he narrowed it a lot in the body. Reopen.  
  > **username_1**: @RewanDemontay You edited out precisely why I thought the question was OK...the narrowing of his basic premise. I want to edit it back some to include his supporting prose.  
  > **username_2**: The headline question is now very different from the one in the body of text. Which should I respond to?  
  > **username_2**: The headline question is not “too broad” (although I can understand the temptation to classify it like that, given that once it is hit with that description it is fair game for moderatorial blocking) any more than the question “is the pope catholic?” too broad. Instead, it’s a question where the answer is too obviously “yes” in most cases  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2020-01-30. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  Yes, castling is good, especially when you are about to be attacked by say, a knight and queen, a king castling to the other side is very good.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: I heard a guy say that there is no center o chess 960. If there is no fighting for control of the center, then most of the action is on the wings? Or the action can happen equally on the center and wings, except for positions where the bishops are on the wings?  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2020-05-15. Score: 3
  
  Another reason why castling is good in 960 chess (and classical chess) is that it **connects the rooks**.
  
  In the following example, Black quickly castled and connected his rooks, while White did not. This is not the only reason for White's defeats, but it is part of it.
  
  ```
  [fen "nqbbrkrn/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/NQBBRKRN w - - 0 1"]
  [title "Shankland - Vachier-Lagrave, Champions Showdown, Chess 960 2018"]
  
  1. d4 d5 2. c3 Ng6 3. Bc2 c6 4. Ng3 O-O 5. h4 f5 6. h5 f4 7. Nf5 e6 8. Nxg7 Kxg7 9. hxg6 e5 10. dxe5 h6 11. Nb3 Qxe5 12. Bd2 Nb6 13. Qd1 Nc4 14. Nd4 Ne3+! 15. Bxe3 fxe3 16. Nf3 exf2!! {Brillant sac of the Queen} 17. Nxe5 Bh4! {and mat follow soon} 18. g3 Bh3+ 19. Rg2 Bxg3! 0-1
  
  ```
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2021-11-05. Score: 1
  
  In [chess870](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/37082/how-many-chess960-positions-exist-in-which-castling-on-1-side-does-not-require-m), the answer is that the principles of castling in regular chess still apply. This is similar to asking if you should still control the centre, develop knights before bishops, etc.
  
  What I haven't found to be discussed online (or even in [Wesley So's chessable course](https://www.chessable.com/the-ascent-wesley-sos-fischer-random-strategies-and-tactics/course/31697/)) however is for the [90 positions of chess960 where castling on one side requires moving (or removing by a capture) a rook on the other side](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/37082/how-many-chess960-positions-exist-in-which-castling-on-1-side-does-not-require-m).
  
  Sure the principles still apply, but I haven't yet found some article or video that gives some examples explaining whether or not you should give up castling rights on 1 side by moving that side's rook in order to castle on the other side.
  
  
  ---
  
  