Answers.Body: <p>I would say that typically black WOULD NOT want to further chase the bishop after h6 Bh4, because typically black has castled kingside. I would also say that typically black WOULD want to further chase the bishop after a6 Ba4 (for the same reason). Getting space on the queenside when you have castled kingside is often desirable; "getting space" on the kingside when you have castled there is much more likely to be "creating weaknesses" and not getting space.</p>
  
  <p>Of course there are tons of exceptions, and it all depends on the position. One example:</p>
  
  <p>In a closed position (such as in the King's Indian Classical), black will often advance his kingside pawns. The rule of thumb in closed positions is to advance pawns on the side where you have the space advantage.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-18T18:15:23.467Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-10-18T18:15:23.467Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Christopher von Krogh
Answers.Body: <p>DISCLAIMER: I'm unrated USCF, but lost most of the games at the last tourney I went to.</p>
  
  <p>It depends entirely on the board.</p>
  
  <p>1) If you can make something happen tactically when the knight is swiped, obviously do it.</p>
  
  <p>2) If your opponent has to recapture with the g7 pawn, I'm biased towards doing it. That's a long term weakness, and doubled pawns aren't pretty after the king's castled. But then, I tend to undervalue doubled middle pawns in the opening anyway.</p>
  
  <p>3) If your opponent has a lot of weak squares of the color of your attacking bishop, keep the bishop.</p>
  
  <p>There's no one-size-fits-all answer.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-11T18:42:05.720Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-10-11T18:42:05.720Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Christopher Berman
Answers.Body: <p>In some cases, the WHOLE POINT of moving the bishop is to provoke h6, which often seriously weakens the king side.</p>
  
  <p>One move worth considering is the sacrifice Bxh6 (after the opponent has castled). If the g-pawn retakes, the king may be exposed to a devastating check by say, Qg4. (Of course, you have to be sure of your followup moves before sacrificing the B.)</p>
  
  <p>In most other situations, retreating the B to h4, or elsewhere, is good enough, since it has done its job.</p>
  
  <p>You need to be more careful about moving the B to b5 on the queen side. A6 often gains time for Black. Even so, it is the key move of the Ruy Lopez opening.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-18T00:30:40.223Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-12T13:52:54.640Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-08-12T13:52:54.640Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tom Au
Answers.Body: <p>Usually the bishop doesn't end up by chance on this square, so why did you move it there in the first place? I can think of three reasons:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>pin the knight in order demobilize it (e.g. an indirect attack on a pawn)</li>
  <li>pin the knight in order to take it (e.g. to give the opponent a doubled pawn)</li>
  <li>provoke a weakness in the opponent's pawn structure</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>Be clear which of these motives apply in your case <em>before</em> you move, then you know what to do afterwards. Obviously "development" isn't a motive, but just an excuse here.</p>
  
  <p>By the way, if your bishop is on b5 and the bishop on c8 isn't developed, sometimes Qa4 is an option (axb5 Qxa8).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-11T19:25:27.520Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-12T13:50:15.663Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-08-12T13:50:15.663Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Landei
Body: <p>I usually get into this position, where I just recently moved the bishop to <strong>g5</strong> (or b5), and his response is moving <strong>h6</strong> (or a6):</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/QYcUt.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>
  
  <p>Usually here, I only consider two possibilities:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li><strong>Take the knight</strong></li>
  <li><strong>Retreat my bishop*</strong></li>
  <li>Do anything else (rarely profitable)</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p><sub>* either to <strong>h4</strong> (or a4), or back in the long diagonal where it came from</sub></p>
  
  <p>I know this position strongly depends on how the other pieces are in the board, but I am sure there are standard responses, with their pros and cons.</p>
  
  <p>I would like to study this position in-depth, possibly read some books that talk about it, anyone can point me in the right direction?</p>
  
  <p>Also, in case of moving it to <strong>h4</strong> (or a4), is it considered a mistake for black to attack again moving the other pawn two squares?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-10-10T23:41:02.363Z
Comments.Text: I just found this related question: http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/239/what-are-the-reasons-why-i-should-not-try-to-take-a-knight-with-my-bishop-if-it?atw=1
Comments.UserDisplayName: ajax333221
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-08-13T22:10:33.850Z
Comments.Text: Annotators frequently say that the pawn move "puts the question" to the bishop. Quite a concise summary.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Philip Roe
Tags: <analysis><strategy><study>
Title: My bishop is attacked by a rook-pawn, now what?
ThreadText: # My bishop is attacked by a rook-pawn, now what?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-10-10)
  
  I usually get into this position, where I just recently moved the bishop to **g5** (or b5), and his response is moving **h6** (or a6):
  
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/QYcUt.png)
  
  Usually here, I only consider two possibilities:
  
  * **Take the knight**
  * **Retreat my bishop\***
  * Do anything else (rarely profitable)
  
  \* either to **h4** (or a4), or back in the long diagonal where it came from
  
  I know this position strongly depends on how the other pieces are in the board, but I am sure there are standard responses, with their pros and cons.
  
  I would like to study this position in-depth, possibly read some books that talk about it, anyone can point me in the right direction?
  
  Also, in case of moving it to **h4** (or a4), is it considered a mistake for black to attack again moving the other pawn two squares?
  
  **Tags:** analysis, strategy, study
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: I just found this related question: http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/239/what-are-the-reasons-why-i-should-not-try-to-take-a-knight-with-my-bishop-if-it?atw=1  
  > **username_1**: Annotators frequently say that the pawn move "puts the question" to the bishop. Quite a concise summary.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2012-10-11. Score: 11 | Accepted answer
  
  Usually the bishop doesn't end up by chance on this square, so why did you move it there in the first place? I can think of three reasons:
  
  * pin the knight in order demobilize it (e.g. an indirect attack on a pawn)
  * pin the knight in order to take it (e.g. to give the opponent a doubled pawn)
  * provoke a weakness in the opponent's pawn structure
  
  Be clear which of these motives apply in your case *before* you move, then you know what to do afterwards. Obviously "development" isn't a motive, but just an excuse here.
  
  By the way, if your bishop is on b5 and the bishop on c8 isn't developed, sometimes Qa4 is an option (axb5 Qxa8).
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2012-10-18. Score: 7
  
  I would say that typically black WOULD NOT want to further chase the bishop after h6 Bh4, because typically black has castled kingside. I would also say that typically black WOULD want to further chase the bishop after a6 Ba4 (for the same reason). Getting space on the queenside when you have castled kingside is often desirable; "getting space" on the kingside when you have castled there is much more likely to be "creating weaknesses" and not getting space.
  
  Of course there are tons of exceptions, and it all depends on the position. One example:
  
  In a closed position (such as in the King's Indian Classical), black will often advance his kingside pawns. The rule of thumb in closed positions is to advance pawns on the side where you have the space advantage.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2012-10-11. Score: 6
  
  DISCLAIMER: I'm unrated USCF, but lost most of the games at the last tourney I went to.
  
  It depends entirely on the board.
  
  1) If you can make something happen tactically when the knight is swiped, obviously do it.
  
  2) If your opponent has to recapture with the g7 pawn, I'm biased towards doing it. That's a long term weakness, and doubled pawns aren't pretty after the king's castled. But then, I tend to undervalue doubled middle pawns in the opening anyway.
  
  3) If your opponent has a lot of weak squares of the color of your attacking bishop, keep the bishop.
  
  There's no one-size-fits-all answer.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2012-10-18. Score: 2
  
  In some cases, the WHOLE POINT of moving the bishop is to provoke h6, which often seriously weakens the king side.
  
  One move worth considering is the sacrifice Bxh6 (after the opponent has castled). If the g-pawn retakes, the king may be exposed to a devastating check by say, Qg4. (Of course, you have to be sure of your followup moves before sacrificing the B.)
  
  In most other situations, retreating the B to h4, or elsewhere, is good enough, since it has done its job.
  
  You need to be more careful about moving the B to b5 on the queen side. A6 often gains time for Black. Even so, it is the key move of the Ruy Lopez opening.
  
  
  ---
  
  