Answers.Body: <p>Only reason can be, statistically, there are more situations where bishops are stronger, comparing to positions where knights are stronger.</p>
  
  <p>There are a lot of elements which affect piece values. It's not possible to say one piece is stronger than other. But you can say 'most likely' stronger. But for the same reason we can argue about rooks 5 point as well. Why not 4.9 or 5.1?</p>
  
  <p>For example, more often, Queen+Knight pairs are stronger than Queen+Bishop pairs. Or you can reach a position where there is 1 or 2 open lines but there are a lot of open diagonals, where bishops beat rooks.</p>
  
  <p>In extreme cases, a rook and even a bishop can be stronger than a Queen (imagine stalemate themes, Saavedra position, for example)</p>
  
  <p>Engines fine tune these metrics to get a slight improvements in performance. There is no commonly accepted 'true' values for pieces. If we assume that there is a 'true' value set for each piece like (x,y,z,s,t), engines are just trying to approximate to these 'true' values.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-03-13T13:10:20.993Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-03-13T13:10:20.993Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ferit
Body: <p>While i was going through the chess piece values, Bishops is worth 3.30 points while Knight has 3.0 points. </p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>Although the 1/3/3/5/9 system of point totals is the most commonly
    given, many other systems of valuing pieces have been proposed.
    Several systems give the bishop slightly more value than the knight. A
    bishop is usually slightly more powerful than a knight, but not always
    – it depends on the position (Evans 1958:77,80), (Mayer 1997:7). A
    chess-playing program was given the value of 3 for the knight and 3.4
    for the bishop (Mayer 1997:5)
    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_piece_relative_value" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_piece_relative_value</a>.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Please explain why is a bishop slightly better than a knight? I know it depends on the position for like as bishops, a knight can also have high points if it is placed on outpost.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-03-13T12:44:27.650Z
Comments.Text: http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/9309/bishop-vs-knight
Comments.UserDisplayName: GloriaVictis
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-03-13T13:16:15.613Z
Comments.Text: Simplistic, but you can force mate with a bishop and knight against a lone king, but you can't with two knights.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Pete Becker
Tags: <positional-play><pieces><point-value>
Title: Why is bishop slightly better than a knight?
ThreadText: # Why is bishop slightly better than a knight?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-03-13)
  
  While i was going through the chess piece values, Bishops is worth 3.30 points while Knight has 3.0 points.
  
  > Although the 1/3/3/5/9 system of point totals is the most commonly
  > given, many other systems of valuing pieces have been proposed.
  > Several systems give the bishop slightly more value than the knight. A
  > bishop is usually slightly more powerful than a knight, but not always
  > – it depends on the position (Evans 1958:77,80), (Mayer 1997:7). A
  > chess-playing program was given the value of 3 for the knight and 3.4
  > for the bishop (Mayer 1997:5)
  > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_piece_relative_value>.
  
  Please explain why is a bishop slightly better than a knight? I know it depends on the position for like as bishops, a knight can also have high points if it is placed on outpost.
  
  **Tags:** positional-play, pieces, point-value
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/9309/bishop-vs-knight  
  > **username_2**: Simplistic, but you can force mate with a bishop and knight against a lone king, but you can't with two knights.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2016-03-13. Score: 0
  
  Only reason can be, statistically, there are more situations where bishops are stronger, comparing to positions where knights are stronger.
  
  There are a lot of elements which affect piece values. It's not possible to say one piece is stronger than other. But you can say 'most likely' stronger. But for the same reason we can argue about rooks 5 point as well. Why not 4.9 or 5.1?
  
  For example, more often, Queen+Knight pairs are stronger than Queen+Bishop pairs. Or you can reach a position where there is 1 or 2 open lines but there are a lot of open diagonals, where bishops beat rooks.
  
  In extreme cases, a rook and even a bishop can be stronger than a Queen (imagine stalemate themes, Saavedra position, for example)
  
  Engines fine tune these metrics to get a slight improvements in performance. There is no commonly accepted 'true' values for pieces. If we assume that there is a 'true' value set for each piece like (x,y,z,s,t), engines are just trying to approximate to these 'true' values.
  
  
  ---
  
  