Answers.Body: <p>I'm not a KID expert, but Joe Gallagher GM is, so I'll quote him from "Starting out: The King's Indian":</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"If you are going to play the King's Indian with Black you may be a
    little confused as to whether you should aim for ... c7-c5 or ...
    e7-e5. I tend to adhere to the following rule:</p>
    
    <p>Play ... e7-e5 except when White develops his queen bishop early. Then
    it's time to start thinking (just thinking mind you) about ... c7-c5.
    The move ... c7-c5 is likely to prise open the long diagonal (after
    ... e7-e5 it usually becomes totally blocked) and the absence of the
    white bishop from the queenside means the dark squares there (such as
    b2) may become vulnerable to pressure from the g7 bishop"</p>
  </blockquote>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-14T01:05:28.950Z
Answers.Text: ..c5 is often followed by ..b5 for a Benko-like setup.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-14T07:16:15.900Z
Answers.Text: Or a Modern Benoni structure after a subsequent d5 e6 something exd cxd
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-14T08:09:05.513Z
Answers.Text: @IanBush I like it as a general principle, and thank you for pointing me to Gallagher's book, maybe I'll have a look at it.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ric S
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-14T08:13:20.503Z
Answers.Text: Just as a side note, I've looked at what has been played by Grandmasters after moving the dark-squared bishop in all the possible squares, and only after `6. Be3` (which enters the _Larsen variation_) the move `6...e5` is the most popular one. This could be an exception to Gallagher's general suggestion.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ric S
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-14T08:21:21.253Z
Answers.Text: Well Be3 often stops c5 as a viable move as after it c5 just drops a pawn for Black ... But see the Saemisch Gambit
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-04-13T10:54:22.543Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-04-13T10:54:22.543Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Body: <p>I'm a casual player who enjoys playing the King's Indian Defense as Black, but I don't fully understand yet when it is better to play <code>6...e5</code> or <code>6...c5</code>. These are my main doubts:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>What are the aims and differences about playing one move instead of the other?</li>
  <li>In which conditions (such as position of opponent's pieces) should I play <code>6...c5</code> instead of the more characteristic <code>6...e5</code>?</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>I've looked at this very interesting <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/16167/why-6-e5-in-kings-indian">question</a> about the aims of playing <code>6...e5</code>, but it does not mention anything about the difference between the two aforementioned moves.</p>
  
  <p>Any extra insight or suggestion is of course more than welcome!</p>
  
Tags: <opening><kings-indian>
Title: King's Indian Defense - When to play 6...c5 or 6...e5
ThreadText: # King's Indian Defense - When to play 6...c5 or 6...e5
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-04-13)
  
  I'm a casual player who enjoys playing the King's Indian Defense as Black, but I don't fully understand yet when it is better to play `6...e5` or `6...c5`. These are my main doubts:
  
  * What are the aims and differences about playing one move instead of the other?
  * In which conditions (such as position of opponent's pieces) should I play `6...c5` instead of the more characteristic `6...e5`?
  
  I've looked at this very interesting [question](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/16167/why-6-e5-in-kings-indian) about the aims of playing `6...e5`, but it does not mention anything about the difference between the two aforementioned moves.
  
  Any extra insight or suggestion is of course more than welcome!
  
  **Tags:** opening, kings-indian
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-04-13. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  I'm not a KID expert, but Joe Gallagher GM is, so I'll quote him from "Starting out: The King's Indian":
  
  > "If you are going to play the King's Indian with Black you may be a
  > little confused as to whether you should aim for ... c7-c5 or ...
  > e7-e5. I tend to adhere to the following rule:
  >
  > Play ... e7-e5 except when White develops his queen bishop early. Then
  > it's time to start thinking (just thinking mind you) about ... c7-c5.
  > The move ... c7-c5 is likely to prise open the long diagonal (after
  > ... e7-e5 it usually becomes totally blocked) and the absence of the
  > white bishop from the queenside means the dark squares there (such as
  > b2) may become vulnerable to pressure from the g7 bishop"
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: ..c5 is often followed by ..b5 for a Benko-like setup.  
  > **username_1**: Or a Modern Benoni structure after a subsequent d5 e6 something exd cxd  
  > **username_0**: @username_1 I like it as a general principle, and thank you for pointing me to Gallagher's book, maybe I'll have a look at it.  
  > **username_0**: Just as a side note, I've looked at what has been played by Grandmasters after moving the dark-squared bishop in all the possible squares, and only after `6. Be3` (which enters the _Larsen variation_) the move `6...e5` is the most popular one. This could be an exception to Gallagher's general suggestion.  
  > **username_1**: Well Be3 often stops c5 as a viable move as after it c5 just drops a pawn for Black ... But see the Saemisch Gambit  
  
  ---
  
  