Answers.Body: <p>I would say the problem is that the Grand Prix is a Fide organised tournament. If you see how often those tournaments are played in almost completely empty halls, it is obvious that Fide doesn't much care about spectator value.</p>
  
  <p>Some other tournaments conveniently have an uneven number of players, which leads to an extra rest day for each player, "unnoticeable" to the spectator. </p>
  
  <p>Generally non-Fide tournaments try to maximise the income from visitors, which means the weekends have to be played (From the top level tournaments I visited, I would estimate that weekend days draw double to triple the number of visitors compared to workdays.). </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-22T10:55:18.113Z
Answers.Text: If I recall correctly, the weekend games in the Baku hosted FIDE Grand Prix attracted a full house, but I get your point that the current version in Khanty-Minsiysk looks dreadful from a crow point of view. Does FIDE have no incentive to make the game more popular?
Answers.UserDisplayName: firtydank
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-22T21:32:25.267Z
Answers.Text: Wijk aan Zee never has an odd number of players, you're confusing it with some other tournament. They also don't charge admission for spectators.
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T07:25:20.280Z
Answers.Text: Yes, your right. I was pretty sure they used to have 13 players, but it seems I was wrong. About admission, in that case Wijk aan Zee is special because there are many (amateur-)tournaments on the same site.
Answers.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-24T20:40:42.137Z
Answers.Text: BKFM, you might have had in mind some recent edition(s) of the London Chess Classic, which had an odd number of participants, and with the off-day player sitting in for part of the commentary on each round.
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-24T21:15:17.873Z
Answers.Text: Yes, I was specifically remembering the commentary, but I actually now thought that was Zürich … but you are right, it was in London. Shows I should really start double checking my memories of top tournaments.
Answers.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-06-02T09:04:51.473Z
Answers.Text: You probably don't understand the difference between Fide tournaments and Fide organized tournaments. But to put it simply, my answer is: Because the Fide doesn't give a damn about spectators.
Answers.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-22T10:36:17.843Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-23T07:26:11.480Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2015-05-23T07:26:11.480Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: BlindKungFuMaster
Answers.Body: <p>Also many of these huge tournaments usually have side excursions/simultaneous exhibits/autograph sessions/kids meeting grandmaters/ etc that are best put over the weekend when spectators, chess enthusiasts and parents can make time to attend/take their kids over as opposed to weekdays that are majorly working days and school time.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-27T10:31:09.273Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-27T10:31:09.273Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rickka
Answers.Body: <p>(the following is my speculation based on following chess for a few decades, I might be wrong)</p>
  
  <p>Most top level chess tournaments do not make money from spectators or from commercials shown to spectators. They make money from <em>sponsors</em>. Sponsors don't usually care all that much about spectators either.</p>
  
  <p>Sponsors care about <em>prestige</em>, about showing business relations around and having them meet some of the grandmasters. About speeches in which they can talk about being smart and looking many moves ahead, and then having their name attached to a tournament.</p>
  
  <p>Having a lot of internet spectators probably helps in attracting sponsors, because you can show that a lot of people are interested and it has global appeal; but that's indirect and not usually considered when choosing rest days. Having good facilities for business networking (weekdays?) probably counts more.</p>
  
  <p>The entire tournament has to last some logical period of time (e.g., they rent a venue for two weeks, from weekend to weekend, because venues are available to rent per week) and then if you want to have a rest day, it's logical to have it in the middle. The more rest days you have the more expensive it is, because the venue probably won't be useable for anything else on the rest days.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T05:09:42.773Z
Answers.Text: If that is the attitude of elite tournament organizers then we can safely stop wondering why chess is struggling to attract spectators even though it is one of the most popular games in the world. Most other sports also don't make the bulk of their income from entry fees either, but their administrators understand that the value of the game lies in its popularity. People don't become interested in something they don't have access to.
Answers.UserDisplayName: firtydank
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-23T05:22:16.257Z
Answers.Text: Also, I don't think they need to have *more* rest days, just *different* ones. As Blindkungfu pointed out, there are ways to organise a tournament so that there are no tournament rest days, but each player still gets a number of rest days. And taking the current GP as an example - if they switched play between Friday and Saturday, they would have same number of rest days and still have their weekend crowd.
Answers.UserDisplayName: firtydank
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-06-02T08:13:59.957Z
Answers.Text: Because football games have a completely different type of sponsor, and _way_ more spectators.
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-22T21:42:35.177Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-22T21:42:35.177Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.Body: <p>The physical demands of GM chess for a game day is higher than pro sports.</p>
  
  <p>Chess Life in the late 50s (early 60s?) had an article by a PhD psychologist who actually measured physiological results of playing in tournaments.</p>
  
  <p>The scheduling has to do with other factors of holding a tournament as TV revenues are not a major concern for the organizers. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-03T15:13:46.970Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-03T15:13:46.970Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: edwina oliver
Body: <p>I'm one of those sad geeks that, instead of watching football of some sort or another, prefer to watch the super GM's battle it out whenever my schedule allows. This weekend I was looking forward to following the FIDE Grand Prix Series, just to find out to my dismay that they are having a rest day on Saturday.</p>
  
  <p>Now I understand that chess is a demanding game and that GM's need their rest, but why do they schedule rest days over the weekend, when spectator interest is at its highest?</p>
  
  <p>Why not have rest days on Mondays and Thursdays, for example? Or alternatively, have a system where players have various rest days, but there is at least one game going on every day for the duration of the tournament.</p>
  
  <p>Surely it is in the interest of the game to maximise the spectator value, which in turn improves the commercial value of the game?</p>
  
Tags: <tournament><fide>
Title: Why do FIDE tournaments have rest days on weekends?
ThreadText: # Why do FIDE tournaments have rest days on weekends?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-22)
  
  I'm one of those sad geeks that, instead of watching football of some sort or another, prefer to watch the super GM's battle it out whenever my schedule allows. This weekend I was looking forward to following the FIDE Grand Prix Series, just to find out to my dismay that they are having a rest day on Saturday.
  
  Now I understand that chess is a demanding game and that GM's need their rest, but why do they schedule rest days over the weekend, when spectator interest is at its highest?
  
  Why not have rest days on Mondays and Thursdays, for example? Or alternatively, have a system where players have various rest days, but there is at least one game going on every day for the duration of the tournament.
  
  Surely it is in the interest of the game to maximise the spectator value, which in turn improves the commercial value of the game?
  
  **Tags:** tournament, fide
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2015-05-22. Score: 5 | Accepted answer
  
  I would say the problem is that the Grand Prix is a Fide organised tournament. If you see how often those tournaments are played in almost completely empty halls, it is obvious that Fide doesn't much care about spectator value.
  
  Some other tournaments conveniently have an uneven number of players, which leads to an extra rest day for each player, "unnoticeable" to the spectator.
  
  Generally non-Fide tournaments try to maximise the income from visitors, which means the weekends have to be played (From the top level tournaments I visited, I would estimate that weekend days draw double to triple the number of visitors compared to workdays.).
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: If I recall correctly, the weekend games in the Baku hosted FIDE Grand Prix attracted a full house, but I get your point that the current version in Khanty-Minsiysk looks dreadful from a crow point of view. Does FIDE have no incentive to make the game more popular?  
  > **username_2**: Wijk aan Zee never has an odd number of players, you're confusing it with some other tournament. They also don't charge admission for spectators.  
  > **username_1**: Yes, your right. I was pretty sure they used to have 13 players, but it seems I was wrong. About admission, in that case Wijk aan Zee is special because there are many (amateur-)tournaments on the same site.  
  > **username_3**: BKFM, you might have had in mind some recent edition(s) of the London Chess Classic, which had an odd number of participants, and with the off-day player sitting in for part of the commentary on each round.  
  > **username_1**: Yes, I was specifically remembering the commentary, but I actually now thought that was Zürich … but you are right, it was in London. Shows I should really start double checking my memories of top tournaments.  
  > **username_1**: You probably don't understand the difference between Fide tournaments and Fide organized tournaments. But to put it simply, my answer is: Because the Fide doesn't give a damn about spectators.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2015-05-27. Score: 6
  
  Also many of these huge tournaments usually have side excursions/simultaneous exhibits/autograph sessions/kids meeting grandmaters/ etc that are best put over the weekend when spectators, chess enthusiasts and parents can make time to attend/take their kids over as opposed to weekdays that are majorly working days and school time.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2015-05-22. Score: 2
  
  (the following is my speculation based on following chess for a few decades, I might be wrong)
  
  Most top level chess tournaments do not make money from spectators or from commercials shown to spectators. They make money from *sponsors*. Sponsors don't usually care all that much about spectators either.
  
  Sponsors care about *prestige*, about showing business relations around and having them meet some of the grandmasters. About speeches in which they can talk about being smart and looking many moves ahead, and then having their name attached to a tournament.
  
  Having a lot of internet spectators probably helps in attracting sponsors, because you can show that a lot of people are interested and it has global appeal; but that's indirect and not usually considered when choosing rest days. Having good facilities for business networking (weekdays?) probably counts more.
  
  The entire tournament has to last some logical period of time (e.g., they rent a venue for two weeks, from weekend to weekend, because venues are available to rent per week) and then if you want to have a rest day, it's logical to have it in the middle. The more rest days you have the more expensive it is, because the venue probably won't be useable for anything else on the rest days.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: If that is the attitude of elite tournament organizers then we can safely stop wondering why chess is struggling to attract spectators even though it is one of the most popular games in the world. Most other sports also don't make the bulk of their income from entry fees either, but their administrators understand that the value of the game lies in its popularity. People don't become interested in something they don't have access to.  
  > **username_0**: Also, I don't think they need to have *more* rest days, just *different* ones. As Blindkungfu pointed out, there are ways to organise a tournament so that there are no tournament rest days, but each player still gets a number of rest days. And taking the current GP as an example - if they switched play between Friday and Saturday, they would have same number of rest days and still have their weekend crowd.  
  > **username_2**: Because football games have a completely different type of sponsor, and _way_ more spectators.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-12-03. Score: 1
  
  The physical demands of GM chess for a game day is higher than pro sports.
  
  Chess Life in the late 50s (early 60s?) had an article by a PhD psychologist who actually measured physiological results of playing in tournaments.
  
  The scheduling has to do with other factors of holding a tournament as TV revenues are not a major concern for the organizers.
  
  
  ---
  
  