Answers.Body: <p>I can not exactly reproduce it on the <a href="https://lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse/r2q1rk1/pbb2pp1/n1p1p2p/1p1nP3/2pPN3/P1P3P1/2BN1P1P/R1BQ1RK1/P_w_-_-_0_1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">lichess analysis board</a>, but the move Nxc4 still seems to be among the top 3-4 moves with a similar evaluation as the top moves. The main idea in this position should be to undermine the dark squares f6, g7, h6 on the king side. Nxc4 aligns well with this idea, since it opens up the bishop's attack to h6 and gives an additional pawn in hand, so after a subsequent P@f6 white still has another pawn for the attack.</p>
  <p>The Stockfish fork used on lichess is far above human level in crazyhouse, so usually its analysis should be quite reliable, although it of course also is not infallible and might miss moves/ideas or misevaluate resulting positions.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-10-25T01:55:20.330Z
Answers.Text: Thanks for your answer! I guess I am underestimating the benefit of having extra pawns; it is as if they are almost as valuable as extra knights. As for reproducing it, as far as I can tell the Lichess Stockfish behaves slightly differently depending on one's computer (as it runs in the browser itself). I was wondering about reliability because I noticed that I can far more easily win in non-standard chess variants against supposedly the same level AI.
Answers.UserDisplayName: user21820
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-10-24T18:15:26.747Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-10-24T18:15:26.747Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Fabian Fichter
Body: <p>I just played my first few games of Crazyhouse, and I really don't understand it. At one point I had this position.</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;White to move&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;r2q1rk1/pbb2pp1/n1p1p2p/1p1nP3/2pPN3/P1P3P1/2BN1P1P/R1BQ1RK1 w - - 1 16&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>Black has no extra pieces, while I (White) have an extra pawn.</p>
  <p>Stockfish 10+ on Lichess (depth 18), says I have an immense advantage of +11.2, it and recommends Nxc4, but I have no idea what general strategy is behind this move. I had instead chosen Qh5, which it does not even place in the top 3 moves but thinks is fine too after I make the move, and I know what I am doing with this move.</p>
  <p>Upon playing out a few lines extending from Nxc4, I get the feeling that the chess engine may have been mistaken about its value. Is it unreliable for Crazyhouse, or is there some underlying strategy behind that move that I am not seeing?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-10-24T14:36:51.163Z
Comments.Text: Can you please post the line?
Comments.UserDisplayName: SmallChess
Tags: <analysis><stockfish><evaluation><crazyhouse>
Title: The best move in this Crazyhouse position according to Stockfish
ThreadText: # The best move in this Crazyhouse position according to Stockfish
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-10-24)
  
  I just played my first few games of Crazyhouse, and I really don't understand it. At one point I had this position.
  
  ```
  [Title "White to move"]
  [FEN "r2q1rk1/pbb2pp1/n1p1p2p/1p1nP3/2pPN3/P1P3P1/2BN1P1P/R1BQ1RK1 w - - 1 16"]
  
  ```
  
  Black has no extra pieces, while I (White) have an extra pawn.
  
  Stockfish 10+ on Lichess (depth 18), says I have an immense advantage of +11.2, it and recommends Nxc4, but I have no idea what general strategy is behind this move. I had instead chosen Qh5, which it does not even place in the top 3 moves but thinks is fine too after I make the move, and I know what I am doing with this move.
  
  Upon playing out a few lines extending from Nxc4, I get the feeling that the chess engine may have been mistaken about its value. Is it unreliable for Crazyhouse, or is there some underlying strategy behind that move that I am not seeing?
  
  **Tags:** analysis, stockfish, evaluation, crazyhouse
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Can you please post the line?  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2020-10-24. Score: 2 | Accepted answer
  
  I can not exactly reproduce it on the [lichess analysis board](https://lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse/r2q1rk1/pbb2pp1/n1p1p2p/1p1nP3/2pPN3/P1P3P1/2BN1P1P/R1BQ1RK1/P_w_-_-_0_1), but the move Nxc4 still seems to be among the top 3-4 moves with a similar evaluation as the top moves. The main idea in this position should be to undermine the dark squares f6, g7, h6 on the king side. Nxc4 aligns well with this idea, since it opens up the bishop's attack to h6 and gives an additional pawn in hand, so after a subsequent P@f6 white still has another pawn for the attack.
  
  The Stockfish fork used on lichess is far above human level in crazyhouse, so usually its analysis should be quite reliable, although it of course also is not infallible and might miss moves/ideas or misevaluate resulting positions.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thanks for your answer! I guess I am underestimating the benefit of having extra pawns; it is as if they are almost as valuable as extra knights. As for reproducing it, as far as I can tell the Lichess Stockfish behaves slightly differently depending on one's computer (as it runs in the browser itself). I was wondering about reliability because I noticed that I can far more easily win in non-standard chess variants against supposedly the same level AI.  
  
  ---
  
  