<p>&quot;Official&quot; would require a context of a publisher or governing body. But if you mean &quot;original&quot; (i.e., as named by its creator), then no. It was <a href="https://makerworld.com/en/models/383761?from=search#profileId-283885" rel="nofollow noreferrer">published 10 days earlier</a> on the same site by what appears to be its creator as</p>
<p>轨道逻辑四子棋 Track Logic Connect Four Chess</p>
<p>The first part of which google translates to &quot;Orbital Logic Tetra&quot;. That model, with rules that were described in the page as being &quot;introduced&quot; with the publication of the model, was created by 我的妹妹最可爱 (@YDlong).</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/nZ8ft.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/nZ8ft.jpg" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>It was released under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike (unlike the &quot;Logic Connect 4&quot; derivation, which says &quot;This work is licensed under a Standard Digital File License.&quot; and without, as far as I can tell, the attribution required by YDlong's publication).</p>
<p>Note that the English translation of the rules on that page is flawed. It says &quot;four pieces on the board after move 3&quot; (which is clearly nonsensical). The correct translation is &quot;A player with four pieces in a row on the board after the third step wins.&quot;</p>
<p>Game play:</p>
<ol>
<li>move an opponent's piece to an adjacent (empty) space.</li>
<li>place your own piece on any empty space.</li>
<li>push the center to cause the pieces to rotate.</li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-09T18:06:57.870Z
If you've upvoted this answer, please consider upvoting the question as well.
L. Scott Johnson
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-03T13:38:27.507Z
2024-04-03T19:00:32.753Z
2024-04-03T19:00:32.753Z
L. Scott Johnson
<p>Do you know the real name of this game called &quot;logic connect 4&quot;?
I've found this at <a href="https://makerworld.com/en/models/403698#profileId-305361" rel="nofollow noreferrer">makerworld</a> which is a 3D print group, but it seems that it's not the real name of the game.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/rSAQP.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/rSAQP.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-02T11:18:33.853Z
Its sounds like a variant to "connect 4", why do you think it's not the real name of the variant?
Cohensius
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-04-09T18:05:41.073Z
Probably because it seemed off. "logic" is not a fitting descriptor without the "orbital" part. No need to downvote on that basis (especially since it turns out the OP's instincts were correct).
L. Scott Johnson
<identify-this-game><variants><connect-four>
Is "logic connect 4" the official name of this connect 4 variant?
Seba99
# Is "logic connect 4" the official name of this connect 4 variant?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2024-04-02)

Do you know the real name of this game called "logic connect 4"?
I've found this at [makerworld](https://makerworld.com/en/models/403698#profileId-305361) which is a 3D print group, but it seems that it's not the real name of the game.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/rSAQP.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/rSAQP.png)

**Tags:** identify-this-game, variants, connect-four

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Its sounds like a variant to "connect 4", why do you think it's not the real name of the variant?  
> **username_2**: Probably because it seemed off. "logic" is not a fitting descriptor without the "orbital" part. No need to downvote on that basis (especially since it turns out the OP's instincts were correct).  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2024-04-03. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

"Official" would require a context of a publisher or governing body. But if you mean "original" (i.e., as named by its creator), then no. It was [published 10 days earlier](https://makerworld.com/en/models/383761?from=search#profileId-283885) on the same site by what appears to be its creator as

轨道逻辑四子棋 Track Logic Connect Four Chess

The first part of which google translates to "Orbital Logic Tetra". That model, with rules that were described in the page as being "introduced" with the publication of the model, was created by 我的妹妹最可爱 (@YDlong).

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/nZ8ft.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/nZ8ft.jpg)

It was released under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike (unlike the "Logic Connect 4" derivation, which says "This work is licensed under a Standard Digital File License." and without, as far as I can tell, the attribution required by YDlong's publication).

Note that the English translation of the rules on that page is flawed. It says "four pieces on the board after move 3" (which is clearly nonsensical). The correct translation is "A player with four pieces in a row on the board after the third step wins."

Game play:

1. move an opponent's piece to an adjacent (empty) space.
2. place your own piece on any empty space.
3. push the center to cause the pieces to rotate.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: If you've upvoted this answer, please consider upvoting the question as well.  

---

