<p>That web application exists at <a href="http://maze-builder.robotturtles.com/" rel="nofollow">http://maze-builder.robotturtles.com/</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-19T23:37:36.340Z
2014-03-19T23:37:36.340Z
Noel Yap
<p>I once heard about a web app for designing Robot Turtles boards. Where is that?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-22T20:32:55.297Z
Recommendations for web apps are off-topic.
Rainbolt
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-25T18:22:28.060Z
Robot Turtles is not a web app. http://www.robotturtles.com/
Noel Yap
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-25T18:24:17.310Z
@AndrewVandever, I used to work for Google. This question was posted almost a year ago when finding Robot Turtles resources was more difficult. Moreover, that search doesn't answer the question.
Noel Yap
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-26T05:55:54.063Z
That's funny, I didn't notice it was such an old question. Who the heck finds old questions and decides to flag them? It does answer the question, though. The top result is (appropriately) http://www.robotturtles.com/mazes/, which describes and links to the app you were looking for.
Andrew Vandever
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-26T18:29:28.223Z
@AndrewVandever, the answer I provided is a more direct answer.
Noel Yap
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-26T18:31:29.570Z
Anyway, the questions *is* about a board game. Can the 'on hold' status be taken off?
Noel Yap
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-27T02:55:39.317Z
I agree on both points, and went ahead and tossed you a reopen vote. :)
Andrew Vandever
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-27T04:13:29.550Z
@AndrewVandever The reason this got flagged after so long was that there is a [meta topic](http://meta.boardgames.stackexchange.com/q/1254/3389) to add tags to untagged questions and this one was reviewed as part of that.
Thunderforge
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-27T06:17:14.400Z
@AndrewVandever _"Who the heck finds old questions and decides to flag them?"_ You seem dumbfounded by this activity, but it's fine and an ordinary part of Stack Exchange site moderation. Anyone who comes across an old question that doesn't fit our current standards can flag or vote for closure, and it'll get closed if other people agree it doesn't fit our current standards. It is not a disruptive activity, and a good part of maintaining site quality. If you find old questions that don't fit our current standards, please do flag or vote for closure.
doppelgreener
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-27T15:51:15.373Z
@doppelgreener Fair enough. I've been more disruptive than anybody on this thread, so I'm sorry about that. I do think that the close votes are unwarranted and reopen is the better choice in this case. Is there a meta topic about supplemental apps? I tried searching for "supplement" and "app", and didn't find anything relevant.
Andrew Vandever
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T19:36:21.807Z
@Thunderforge, I've tagged the question.
Noel Yap
<robot-turtles>
Where can I find the web app for designing Robot Turtles boards?
Noel Yap
# Where can I find the web app for designing Robot Turtles boards?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-03-19)

I once heard about a web app for designing Robot Turtles boards. Where is that?

**Tags:** robot-turtles

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Recommendations for web apps are off-topic.  
> **username_0**: Robot Turtles is not a web app. http://www.robotturtles.com/  
> **username_0**: @username_2, I used to work for Google. This question was posted almost a year ago when finding Robot Turtles resources was more difficult. Moreover, that search doesn't answer the question.  
> **username_2**: That's funny, I didn't notice it was such an old question. Who the heck finds old questions and decides to flag them? It does answer the question, though. The top result is (appropriately) http://www.robotturtles.com/mazes/, which describes and links to the app you were looking for.  
> **username_0**: @username_2, the answer I provided is a more direct answer.  
> **username_0**: Anyway, the questions *is* about a board game. Can the 'on hold' status be taken off?  
> **username_2**: I agree on both points, and went ahead and tossed you a reopen vote. :)  
> **username_3**: @username_2 The reason this got flagged after so long was that there is a [meta topic](http://meta.boardgames.stackexchange.com/q/1254/3389) to add tags to untagged questions and this one was reviewed as part of that.  
> **username_4**: @username_2 _"Who the heck finds old questions and decides to flag them?"_ You seem dumbfounded by this activity, but it's fine and an ordinary part of Stack Exchange site moderation. Anyone who comes across an old question that doesn't fit our current standards can flag or vote for closure, and it'll get closed if other people agree it doesn't fit our current standards. It is not a disruptive activity, and a good part of maintaining site quality. If you find old questions that don't fit our current standards, please do flag or vote for closure.  
> **username_2**: @username_4 Fair enough. I've been more disruptive than anybody on this thread, so I'm sorry about that. I do think that the close votes are unwarranted and reopen is the better choice in this case. Is there a meta topic about supplemental apps? I tried searching for "supplement" and "app", and didn't find anything relevant.  
> **username_0**: @username_3, I've tagged the question.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_0 on 2014-03-19. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

That web application exists at <http://maze-builder.robotturtles.com/>.


---

