<p>One useful place to look for rulings on cards is gatherer.wizards.com - if you <a href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=43587">look up Test of Faith there</a> you can click through to display the following useful ruling:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>01/12/2004    The +1/+1 counters are put onto the creature at the time
  the damage is prevented. If a 1/1 creature would be dealt 6 damage, 3
  damage is prevented and three +1/+1 counters are put onto the
  creature. The creature is a 4/4 creature with 3 damage on it, so it
  won't be destroyed because State-Based Actions aren't checked until
  after Test of Faith is finished resolving.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In short I agree with (and will upvote) Samthere's answer, but this is just to advise you of a useful resource that may help to resolve future disputes!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-17T13:39:32.283Z
2011-08-17T13:39:32.283Z
thesunneversets
<p>P1 controls A: 4/4 attacker
P2 controls B: 1/1 blocker</p>

<p>Since Test of Faith has been cast and has resolved (probably during the declare blockers step, after declaring your blocker), it is not on the stack. When it resolves it creates a prevention shield that floats around, waiting for damage to prevent or the end of the turn to expire.</p>

<p>The declare attackers and blockers steps finish and the combat damage step begins:</p>

<ol>
<li>P1 announces how attacking creatures assign damage (in this case, the only option is 4 damage from A to B).</li>
<li>P2 announces how blocking creatures assign damage (in this case, the only option is 1 damage from B to A).</li>
<li>Combat damage is dealt simultaneously as originally assigned, so your creature will only ever deal 1 damage in this combat even if its power changes now.</li>
<li>Creature A takes 1 damage; creature B would take 4, but the Test of Faith shields change that: 3 damage is prevented, and 3 (permanent) +1/+1 counters are put on Creature B and it takes 1 damage.
Even if the 4th point of damage lands before the counters are put down, neither player gains priority and so state-based effects (such as a creature dying) are not checked before the counters are placed. <em>For more on this point, see thesunneversets' answer below.</em></li>
<li>Both creatures are 4/4 and have taken 1 damage this turn.</li>
</ol>

<p>The combat damage step ends and the end of combat step begins.</p>

<p><strong>Result:</strong> neither creature dies; neither of you were correct!</p>

<p>See: <a href="http://wiki.mtgsalvation.com/article/Combat_Phase">http://wiki.mtgsalvation.com/article/Combat_Phase</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-17T10:49:37.560Z
2012-10-21T16:53:50.857Z
2012-10-21T16:53:50.857Z
Samthere
<p>This is the scenario: He attacks with a 4/4, and I block with a 1/1. I cast <a class="mtg-autocard" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Test%20of%20Faith">Test of Faith</a> on my 1/1.</p>
<p>I say his creature dies, because I block three damage and become a 4/4, killing him, but he says that the +1/+1 counters don't come into play until all damage has been effected, meaning the 4th damage point would kill my creature.</p>
<p>Who is right?</p>

<magic-the-gathering>
How is Test of Faith resolved?
Skeith
# How is Test of Faith resolved?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-08-17)

This is the scenario: He attacks with a 4/4, and I block with a 1/1. I cast [Test of Faith](https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Test%20of%20Faith) on my 1/1.

I say his creature dies, because I block three damage and become a 4/4, killing him, but he says that the +1/+1 counters don't come into play until all damage has been effected, meaning the 4th damage point would kill my creature.

Who is right?

**Tags:** magic-the-gathering


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2011-08-17. Score: 49 | Accepted answer

P1 controls A: 4/4 attacker
P2 controls B: 1/1 blocker

Since Test of Faith has been cast and has resolved (probably during the declare blockers step, after declaring your blocker), it is not on the stack. When it resolves it creates a prevention shield that floats around, waiting for damage to prevent or the end of the turn to expire.

The declare attackers and blockers steps finish and the combat damage step begins:

1. P1 announces how attacking creatures assign damage (in this case, the only option is 4 damage from A to B).
2. P2 announces how blocking creatures assign damage (in this case, the only option is 1 damage from B to A).
3. Combat damage is dealt simultaneously as originally assigned, so your creature will only ever deal 1 damage in this combat even if its power changes now.
4. Creature A takes 1 damage; creature B would take 4, but the Test of Faith shields change that: 3 damage is prevented, and 3 (permanent) +1/+1 counters are put on Creature B and it takes 1 damage.
   Even if the 4th point of damage lands before the counters are put down, neither player gains priority and so state-based effects (such as a creature dying) are not checked before the counters are placed. *For more on this point, see username_1' answer below.*
5. Both creatures are 4/4 and have taken 1 damage this turn.

The combat damage step ends and the end of combat step begins.

**Result:** neither creature dies; neither of you were correct!

See: <http://wiki.mtgsalvation.com/article/Combat_Phase>


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2011-08-17. Score: 24

One useful place to look for rulings on cards is gatherer.wizards.com - if you [look up Test of Faith there](http://gatherer.wizards.com/pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=43587) you can click through to display the following useful ruling:

> 01/12/2004 The +1/+1 counters are put onto the creature at the time
> the damage is prevented. If a 1/1 creature would be dealt 6 damage, 3
> damage is prevented and three +1/+1 counters are put onto the
> creature. The creature is a 4/4 creature with 3 damage on it, so it
> won't be destroyed because State-Based Actions aren't checked until
> after Test of Faith is finished resolving.

In short I agree with (and will upvote) username_2's answer, but this is just to advise you of a useful resource that may help to resolve future disputes!


---

