Answers.Body: <p>I did something like this once, I cut down a butter tub and built the lego around it, with plates hiding the top edge.  It worked very well, but the stale tea that I used for the swamp stained my bricks.</p>
  
  <p>I can only think that a brick-built wall with a plastic carrier bag secured by a plate layer at the very top would be your best bet, as none of the bricks would be modified, and the shape can be completely random.</p>
  
  <p>And as you can see, both crocodiles and sharks float nicely.</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Amswn.jpg" alt="enter image description here"> </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-28T23:37:55.027Z
Answers.Text: Cunning plan there Windfire, that should work nicely. An alternative to the carrier bag would be clingfilm/film wrap.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-28T22:06:57.207Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-01-29T18:28:55.450Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2014-01-29T18:28:55.450Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Windfire
Answers.Body: <p>In my experience, this doesn't work very well. The gaps between LEGO bricks are too wide to hold water. The water will be contained for a short amount of time, but it will eventually leak out through the cracks.</p>
  
  <p>Here's an experiment showing how your first example works. Notice the water leaking out the crack in the bottom right:</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/I6fK7.jpg" alt="starting too leak"></p>
  
  <p>The leak continues to grow:</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/D8G7u.jpg" alt="more leaking"></p>
  
  <p>I haven't personally tested this with running water, but I can only imagine that this would increase the rate that water will leak out.</p>
  
  <p>If you're interested in building some sort of running water feature, you may want to take a look at <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/a/1590/708">this answer</a> that suggests waterproofing the bricks using liquid latex after assembly.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-28T22:29:13.377Z
Answers.Text: You will have less leakage with a double wall of 1xN bricks, but IME it still leaks (I've built boats rather than ponds, but the result is the same)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Móż
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T02:22:10.810Z
Answers.Text: What if you used those really short ones in a brick-layer formation (half on one block, half on the next)?  Shouldn't that remove the bigger holes?
Answers.UserDisplayName: David Starkey
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T14:05:55.127Z
Answers.Text: lego water has to be blue. yours is boringly transparent. +1 for science
Answers.UserDisplayName: Stephane Delcroix
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-28T18:34:41.997Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-01-28T20:52:54.923Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-13T12:47:56.213Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: jncraton
Body: <p>Water is commonly represented with blue pieces, but what if I tried adding real water to a setup?</p>
  
  <p>For example, I create a simple blue base with a rectangle making a sort of pool. If I fill that rectangle, would the water be held inside the pool?
  <img src="https://i.sstatic.net/jGMtp.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>
  
  <p>Example 2, make a river using taller pieces as the bank and run water over it.
  <img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ax5YB.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>
  
  <p>I already saw that <a href="https://bricks.stackexchange.com/a/595/2472">LEGO bricks can float</a> so maybe adding a nifty <a href="http://www.buildingexamples.com/lego/animals30/249-lego-crocodile" rel="nofollow noreferrer">crocodile</a> into a moat or something.</p>
  
Tags: <water>
Title: How well do LEGO assemblies hold water?
UserDisplayName: David Starkey
ThreadText: # How well do LEGO assemblies hold water?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2014-01-28)
  
  Water is commonly represented with blue pieces, but what if I tried adding real water to a setup?
  
  For example, I create a simple blue base with a rectangle making a sort of pool. If I fill that rectangle, would the water be held inside the pool?
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/jGMtp.png)
  
  Example 2, make a river using taller pieces as the bank and run water over it.
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/ax5YB.png)
  
  I already saw that [LEGO bricks can float](https://bricks.stackexchange.com/a/595/2472) so maybe adding a nifty [crocodile](http://www.buildingexamples.com/lego/animals30/249-lego-crocodile) into a moat or something.
  
  **Tags:** water
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2014-01-28. Score: 12 | Accepted answer
  
  In my experience, this doesn't work very well. The gaps between LEGO bricks are too wide to hold water. The water will be contained for a short amount of time, but it will eventually leak out through the cracks.
  
  Here's an experiment showing how your first example works. Notice the water leaking out the crack in the bottom right:
  
  ![starting too leak](https://i.sstatic.net/I6fK7.jpg)
  
  The leak continues to grow:
  
  ![more leaking](https://i.sstatic.net/D8G7u.jpg)
  
  I haven't personally tested this with running water, but I can only imagine that this would increase the rate that water will leak out.
  
  If you're interested in building some sort of running water feature, you may want to take a look at [this answer](https://bricks.stackexchange.com/a/1590/708) that suggests waterproofing the bricks using liquid latex after assembly.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: You will have less leakage with a double wall of 1xN bricks, but IME it still leaks (I've built boats rather than ponds, but the result is the same)  
  > **username_0**: What if you used those really short ones in a brick-layer formation (half on one block, half on the next)?  Shouldn't that remove the bigger holes?  
  > **username_5**: lego water has to be blue. yours is boringly transparent. +1 for science  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2014-01-28. Score: 7
  
  I did something like this once, I cut down a butter tub and built the lego around it, with plates hiding the top edge. It worked very well, but the stale tea that I used for the swamp stained my bricks.
  
  I can only think that a brick-built wall with a plastic carrier bag secured by a plate layer at the very top would be your best bet, as none of the bricks would be modified, and the shape can be completely random.
  
  And as you can see, both crocodiles and sharks float nicely.
  
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Amswn.jpg)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: Cunning plan there username_1, that should work nicely. An alternative to the carrier bag would be clingfilm/film wrap.  
  
  ---
  
  