Answers.Body: <p> 3. c4 will likely transpose to a King Indian defense while 3. Nc3 will likely lead to a Pirc. 1. e4 players will prefer the more familiar Pirc positions.</p>
  
  <p>The Modern Defense move order lets White decide the main position.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-08T07:07:54.920Z
Answers.Text: Good point, but it does not really answer why people tend to play 3.Nc3 over 3.c4. I would say that White often feels more comfortable playing against Pirc than against the King's Indian. Also, players who want to face the King's Indian may have played 1.d4 g6 2.c4, not even reaching the position in question.
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-05T05:58:27.810Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-06-01T16:30:01.467Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-06-01T16:30:01.467Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: CWallach
Answers.Body: <p>There is no such principle as "don't block your c-pawn". A c3/c4 pawn push is better in some positions and worse in others. What White intends is to develop his queenside fast, castle there and launch a kingside attack with his pawns, so c4 is out of the question if you want to play that plan.</p>
  
  <p>Indeed, White would want to do the same thing against the King's Indian, the reason why he doesn't is that Black would not allow it! See for instance 1.d4 Nf6 and now 2.Nc3 is not done because 2...d5 would come, otherwise, if would be the best move!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-05T07:08:04.750Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-10T14:47:31.400Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-10T14:47:31.400Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.Body: <p>It is just a matter of taste.  White is playing a king pawn opening so with the pawn on e4 the principal of blocking the c-pawn does not apply.   White simply doesn't want to play a King's Indian defense.</p>
  
  <p>With Nc3 White has a lot of options:  </p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>For one he can seek a more Dragon type game with the idea of Bc1-e3, 
  Qd2, and h2-h4; often with f2-f3 being played.</li>
  <li>Alternatively, White    can go for f2-f4 lines probably pushing
  e4-e5.</li>
  <li>Or White can play    classically with Nf3 and Be2.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>So overall a flexible developing move.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-05T20:32:35.060Z
Answers.Text: And white can still cover d4 with a pawn, so in that sense Nc3 is less commital
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-04-05T19:36:12.217Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-04-05T19:36:12.217Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ywapom
Answers.Body: <p>3.Nc3 saves a tempo by not pushing the c-pawn first, which could be important in some sharp lines. However, 3.c4 is equally as good, transposing from the Pirc into the King's Indian.</p>
  
  <p>It really just depends on your preferences.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-06-01T21:05:57.380Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-06-01T21:05:57.380Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.Body: <p>Carlsen used to play 3.Nf3 with the idea of 3...d6 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.Qe2 0-0 6.0-0, with Rd1 and e5 following. It is very easy to play with white because the attack is immediate, and solving the black issues on the board seems not to be that easy.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-06-01T02:41:33.763Z
Answers.Text: That doesn't answer the question why `Nc3` is played.
Answers.UserDisplayName: fuxia
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-06-01T11:36:54.463Z
Answers.Text: Indeed, it meant to be a comment to Ywapom.
Answers.UserDisplayName: La buba
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-05-31T23:31:41.227Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-05-31T23:31:41.227Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: La buba
Body: <p>After:</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  
  1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>by far the most common third move is 3. Nc3. This goes against the principle of not blocking the c pawn with the knight as white, now of course principles can be broken but I can't see the benefit of doing so here.</p>
  
  <p>The e4 pawn does not need defending, and if the aim is to stop 3... d5 then 3. c4 achieves this as well, then Nc3 can be played later.</p>
  
  <p>So why is it not preferable to play 3. c4 before Nc3?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-04-05T06:43:42.370Z
Comments.Text: Nothing wrong with c4, I suspect (hence a comment rather than an answer) that the reason is more practical - very few players are truly ambidextrous (i.e. play 1 e4 and 1 d4 with equal confidence) and so your average e4 player won't feel happy going into the white side of a Kings Indian which is what c4 invites. But he or she will have their pet line against the Pirc, and so why not Nc3 to see if you can go there? For instance I play the Austrian attack against both Pirc and Modern move orders, but have never played 1 d4 in a serious game.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Ian Bush
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-09-28T23:31:33.477Z
Comments.Text: 3.c4 would transpose to the King's Indian Defense, arising usually from 1.d4.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Tags: <opening><positional-play><modern-defense>
Title: Why is 3. Nc3 played in mainline of the Modern Defense?
ThreadText: # Why is 3. Nc3 played in mainline of the Modern Defense?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-04-05)
  
  After:
  [FEN ""]
  
  1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7
  
  by far the most common third move is 3. Nc3. This goes against the principle of not blocking the c pawn with the knight as white, now of course principles can be broken but I can't see the benefit of doing so here.
  The e4 pawn does not need defending, and if the aim is to stop 3... d5 then 3. c4 achieves this as well, then Nc3 can be played later.
  So why is it not preferable to play 3. c4 before Nc3?
  
  **Tags:** opening, positional-play, modern-defense
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Nothing wrong with c4, I suspect (hence a comment rather than an answer) that the reason is more practical - very few players are truly ambidextrous (i.e. play 1 e4 and 1 d4 with equal confidence) and so your average e4 player won't feel happy going into the white side of a Kings Indian which is what c4 invites. But he or she will have their pet line against the Pirc, and so why not Nc3 to see if you can go there? For instance I play the Austrian attack against both Pirc and Modern move orders, but have never played 1 d4 in a serious game.  
  > **username_2**: 3.c4 would transpose to the King's Indian Defense, arising usually from 1.d4.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-04-05. Score: 6
  
  3. c4 will likely transpose to a King Indian defense while 3. Nc3 will likely lead to a Pirc. 1. e4 players will prefer the more familiar Pirc positions.
  
  The Modern Defense move order lets White decide the main position.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: Good point, but it does not really answer why people tend to play 3.Nc3 over 3.c4. I would say that White often feels more comfortable playing against Pirc than against the King's Indian. Also, players who want to face the King's Indian may have played 1.d4 g6 2.c4, not even reaching the position in question.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-04-05. Score: 3
  
  There is no such principle as "don't block your c-pawn". A c3/c4 pawn push is better in some positions and worse in others. What White intends is to develop his queenside fast, castle there and launch a kingside attack with his pawns, so c4 is out of the question if you want to play that plan.
  
  Indeed, White would want to do the same thing against the King's Indian, the reason why he doesn't is that Black would not allow it! See for instance 1.d4 Nf6 and now 2.Nc3 is not done because 2...d5 would come, otherwise, if would be the best move!
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-04-05. Score: 3
  
  It is just a matter of taste. White is playing a king pawn opening so with the pawn on e4 the principal of blocking the c-pawn does not apply. White simply doesn't want to play a King's Indian defense.
  
  With Nc3 White has a lot of options:
  
  * For one he can seek a more Dragon type game with the idea of Bc1-e3,
    Qd2, and h2-h4; often with f2-f3 being played.
  * Alternatively, White can go for f2-f4 lines probably pushing
    e4-e5.
  * Or White can play classically with Nf3 and Be2.
  
  So overall a flexible developing move.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: And white can still cover d4 with a pawn, so in that sense Nc3 is less commital  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-06-01. Score: 1
  
  3.Nc3 saves a tempo by not pushing the c-pawn first, which could be important in some sharp lines. However, 3.c4 is equally as good, transposing from the Pirc into the King's Indian.
  
  It really just depends on your preferences.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2019-05-31. Score: 0
  
  Carlsen used to play 3.Nf3 with the idea of 3...d6 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.Qe2 0-0 6.0-0, with Rd1 and e5 following. It is very easy to play with white because the attack is immediate, and solving the black issues on the board seems not to be that easy.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_7**: That doesn't answer the question why `Nc3` is played.  
  > **username_6**: Indeed, it meant to be a comment to username_5.  
  
  ---
  
  