Answers.Body: <p>An example where the Bishop is the windmill piece.</p>
  
  <pre><code>
  [fen "7R/kr4P1/5P2/4P3/3P4/b1P5/P1PP4/K2R4 b - - 0 0"]
  
  1...Bb2+ 2. Kb1 Bxc3+ 3. Kc1 Bb2+ 4. Kb1 Bxd4+ 5. Kc1 Bb2+ 6. Kb1 Bxe5+ 7. Kc1 Bb2+ 8. Kb1 Bxf6+ 9. Kc1 Bb2+ 10. Kb1 Bxg7+ 11. Kc1 Bb2+ 12. Kb1 Bxh8+
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Since the requirement is that the windmill and the discovered piece move differently that is two with Bishop, four with Knight, and two with Rook as the windmill piece, for a total of 8 types of windmill attacks.</p>
  
  <p>EDIT:  Inserting windmill position with Rook and Knight.</p>
  
  <pre><code>
  
  [FEN "5rk1/R7/6N1/4p3/5p1p/8/8/K5R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. Nxh4+ Kh8 2. Ng6+ Kg8 3. Nxf4+ Kh8 4. Ng6+ Kg8 5. Nxe5+ Kh8 6. Ng6+ Kg8 7.
  Nxf8+ *
  
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T07:15:16.500Z
Answers.Text: This answer is a bit confusing to me. Could you give two distinct types of different windmills with the bishop being the moving piece? I doubt it's possible if we don't differentiate between light-squared and dark-squared bishops. I get four distinct patterns: R+B, B+R, R+N, B+N, where the first mentioned piece in each pattern is the stationary piece in the windmill, and the second piece is the moving piece. I cannot see any more combinations than this. Note that I do not consider Q+B to be distinct from R+B.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Scounged
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T09:01:15.560Z
Answers.Text: You definitely can't use a knight as the stationary piece, which I think is where the overcounting occurred. Either that, or the queen was counted twice, once orthogonally, and once diagonally, which as you point out, should not be considered distinct from the rook and the bishop respectively.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jivan Scarano
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T16:51:23.667Z
Answers.Text: List better the windmills more explained and I will accept the answer. I can't accept like this is confusing.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Santropedro
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T17:00:53.183Z
Answers.Text: Give examples of the windmills like the one you did. You will realize it's not so easy with knight and rook.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Santropedro
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-02T08:35:26.853Z
Answers.Text: I did count the checking piece being different as a different windmill, therefore my count is twice yours.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mike Jones
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T01:41:38.120Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-07-31T06:04:26.823Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-07-31T06:04:26.823Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mike Jones
Answers.Body: <p>There is a game (<a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1012556" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Alekhine vs Fletcher, London simultaneous 1928</a>) where knight and bishop win (with queen sacrifice).</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;&quot;]
  [Event &quot;Simul, 6b&quot;]
  [Site &quot;Gambit Chess Rooms, London ENG&quot;]
  [Date &quot;1928.06.08&quot;]
  [EventDate &quot;?&quot;]
  [Round &quot;?&quot;]
  [Result &quot;1-0&quot;]
  [White &quot;Alexander Alekhine&quot;]
  [Black &quot;Alan Linnell Fletcher&quot;]
  [ECO &quot;A31&quot;]
  [WhiteElo &quot;?&quot;]
  [BlackElo &quot;?&quot;]
  [PlyCount &quot;63&quot;]
  [StartPly &quot;50&quot;]
  
  1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d4 Nc6 4. d5 Nb8 5. Nc3 d6 6. g3 g6
  7. Bg2 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. Bf4 h6 10. Qd2 Kh7 11. e4 Nh5 12. Be3
  Nd7 13. Rae1 Rb8 14. Nh4 Ndf6 15. h3 Ng8 16. g4 Nhf6 17. f4 e6
  18. Nf3 exd5 19. cxd5 b5 20. e5 b4 21. Nd1 Ne4 22. Qd3 f5
  23. e6 Qa5 24. gxf5 gxf5 25. Nh4 Ba6 26. Qxe4 fxe4 27. Bxe4+
  Kh8 28. Ng6+ Kh7 29. Nxf8+ Kh8 30. Ng6+ Kh7 31. Ne5+ Kh8
  32. Nf7# 1-0
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-11-05T05:38:23.090Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-11-05T07:47:28.540Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-11-05T07:47:28.540Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: user25172
Answers.Body: <p>I do not have to time to create a diagram of every type, but it seems intuitive to me that it would be possible to contrive a windmill from any pair of (non-pawn) pieces where:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>The stationary piece is a slider</li>
  <li>The moving piece is any other type of piece not capable of attacking along the axis at which the stationary piece will give check</li>
  </ul>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-08-30T19:02:59.797Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-08-30T19:02:59.797Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: DTR
Answers.Body: <p>I have compiled a complete list of all types of windmills. A windmill, known as a &quot;zwickmühle&quot; in Germany, is a sequence of attacks and discovered attacks performed by two pieces, one stationary and the other moving, on an opponent's piece, most often the King, used to gain material.</p>
  <p>Two principles define the structure of a windmill.</p>
  <ol>
  <li><p>The stationary piece is one with infinite range, meaning it will be either a bishop, a rook, or a queen.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>Excluding kings, it is not possible for the moving piece to attack in the same direction as the stationary piece. The moving piece moves opposite the attacking direction of the stationary piece.</p>
  </li>
  </ol>
  <p>I am utilizing chess problems to demonstrate each and every type. There are two categories based on the stationary piece's attacking line, which are vertical/horizontal and diagonal. The moving piece is listed first followed by the stationary piece.</p>
  <p><strong>Vertical/horizontal Stationery Pieces</strong></p>
  <p>Bishop+Rook</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Alfred O. Karlström, Die Schwalbe 02/1940, Mate In 13&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;k2K2n1/Bp6/1p6/1pp5/R2p4/4p3/5p2/6b1 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. Ra2 Bh2 2. Bxb6+ Kb8 3. Ba7+ Ka8 4. Bxc5+ Kb8 5. Ba7+ Ka8 6. Bxd4+ Kb8 7.  Ba7+ Ka8 8. Bxe3+ Kb8 9. Ba7+ Ka8 10. Bxf2+ Kb8 11. Ba7+ Ka8 12. Bg1+ Kb8 13.  Bxh2#
  </code></pre>
  <p>Source: <a href="https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1226245" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Die Schwalbe Chess Problem Database</a></p>
  <p>Bishop+Queen</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Ārons Ņimcovičs, Unknown Publication 1925, Mate In 13&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;4r1k1/5p2/R5BQ/5p2/4p3/3n4/b1n4K/br6 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. Bh7+ Kh8 2. Bxf5+ Kg8 3. Bh7+ Kh8 4. Bxe4+ Kg8 5. Bh7+ Kh8 6. Bxd3+ Kg8 7.  Bh7+ Kh8 8. Bxc2+ Kg8 9. Bh7+ Kh8 10. Bxb1+ Kg8 11. Rg6+ fxg6 12. Bxa2+ Re6 13. Bxe6#
  </code></pre>
  <p>Source: <a href="https://www.yacpdb.org/#328129" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Yet Another Chess Problem Database</a></p>
  <p>Knight+Rook/Queen</p>
  <p>See Mike Jone’s <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/14796/15543">answer.</a></p>
  <p><strong>Diagonal Stationery Pieces</strong></p>
  <p>Rook+Bishop/Queen</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Josef Krejcik, Wiener Schachzeitung 2/1925 On Pages 41-42, White Wins&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;5nk1/nbnbnbrR/6bn/6n1/6b1/2B3n1/1K4b1/r5n1 w KQkq - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. Rxg7+ Kh8 2. Rxf7+ Kg8 3. Rg7+ Kh8 4. Rxe7+ Kg8 5. Rg7+ Kh8 6. Rxd7+ Kg8 7.  Rg7+ Kh8 8. Rxc7+ Kg8 9. Rg7+ Kh8 10. Rxb7+ Kg8 11. Rg7+ Kh8 12. Rxa7+ Kg8 13.  Rg7+ Kh8 14. Rxg6+ Kh7 15. Rg7+ Kh8 16. Rxg5+ Kh7 17. Rg7+ Kh8 18. Rxg4+ Kh7 19.  Rg7+ Kh8 20. Rxg3+ Kh7 21. Rg7+ Kh8 22. Rxg2+ Kh7 23. Rg7+ Kh8 24. Rxg1+ Kh7 25. Rg7+ Kh8 26. Kxa1 Nh7 27. Rg6+ Nf6 28. Rxh6+ Kg7 29. Rxf6
  </code></pre>
  <p>Source: <a href="http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/seesaw.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Edward Winter’s Chess Notes article entitled &quot;The Chess Seesaw&quot;</a></p>
  <p>Knight+Bishop/Queen</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;M. Kwiatkowski, The Problemist 1992, Mate In 29&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;3n4/rBp1p3/2P5/2PK4/k2N4/pp2R3/bppB2Rp/q1n1r1b1 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. Rg4 h1=Q+ 2. Nf3+ Kb5 3. Rb4+ Ka5 4. Rbe4+ Kb5 5. Nd4+ Ka4 6. Ne2+ Kb5 7. Nc3+ Ka5 8. Nxa2+ Kb5 9. Nc3+ Ka5 10. Ne2+ Kb5 11. Nd4+ Ka4 12. Nf3+ Kb5 13. Rb4+ Ka5 14. Rbxb3+ Ka4 15. Rb4+ Ka5 16. Rbe4+ Kb5 17. Nd4+ Ka4 18. Ne2+ Kb5 19. Nc3+ Ka5 20. Na2+ Kb5 21. Ba6+ Rxa6 22. Nc3+ Ka5 23. Ne2+ Kb5 24. Nd4+ Ka4 25. Nf3+ Kb5 26. Rb4+ Ka5 27. Rb6+ Ka4 28. Rxa6+ Kb5 29. Ra5#
  </code></pre>
  <p>Source: <a href="https://timkr.home.xs4all.nl/chess2/diary14txt.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Tim Krabbe's Website Diary Entry #270</a></p>
  <p>King+Bishop/Queen</p>
  <p>See Noam D. Elkies's <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/15299/15543">answer.</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-06-06T20:25:40.557Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-16T21:23:34.413Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-01-16T21:23:34.413Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rewan Demontay
Answers.Body: <p>Yet more possibilities . . .</p>
  
  <p>: Two-way windmill, with either Rook or Bishop as the front piece;
  e.g. with a Rook:</p>
  
  <pre><code>5n2/3bb2k/6pp/4B1pr/8/8/8/5RK1 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Rf7+ Kg8
  2. Rg7+ Kh8
  3. Rxe7+ Kg8
  4. Rg7+ Kh8
  5. Rxd7+ Kg8
  6. Rg7+ Kh8
  7. Rxg6+ Kh7
  8. Rg7+ Kh8
  9. Rxg5+ Kh7
  10. Rxh5
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>(it's important to capture g5 last, else Black has Rh5xe5)</p>
  
  <p>: Windmill against a piece other than a King:</p>
  
  <pre><code>5kr1/6pp/8/4N1p1/6p1/6P1/6BP/6K1 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Bd5! Rh8 
  2. Nf7! Rg8 
  3. Nxg5 Rh8 
  4. Nf7 Rg8 
  5. Ne5 Rh8 
  6. Nxg4
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>(with better winning chances than the immediate 1 Nxg4)</p>
  
  <p>: That means that even the King can be the front piece of a
  windmill of sorts against a Knight:</p>
  
  <pre><code>8/8/1n1p1p2/3K1k2/8/1P6/6B1/8 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Kc6! Na8
  2. Kxd6 Nb6
  3. Kc7
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>(or first 3. Bb7 and then 4. Kc7(c6); if 1...Nc8 then 2 Bh3+ wins.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-09-06T02:19:34.840Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-09-06T02:55:54.237Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-09-06T02:55:54.237Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Noam D. Elkies
Body: <p>I'm interested in chess patterns similar to the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windmill_(chess)" rel="noreferrer">windmill</a>. If you think there are none more than the ones that I'm listing I'm interested in a proof that satisfies me to stop looking for more of them. Wikipedia gives this definition for a windmill:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>In chess, a windmill is a tactic in which a combination of discovered
  checks and regular checks, usually by a rook and a bishop, can win
  massive amounts of material. This tactic is also sometimes referred to
  as a see-saw.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>I know two windmills. First the one in the <a href="http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008361" rel="noreferrer">&quot;game of the century&quot; between Fisher and Byrne</a> (moves between 18 and 23 black does a windmill), it involves a bishop and a knight (also a rook, but it's not essential. For example see this game for a windmill knight-bishop without white rook.</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;K7/8/8/2B5/4N3/7q/6pp/3r1b1k w - - 0 9&quot;]
  
  9.Nf2+ Kg1 10.Nxh3+ Kh1 11.Nf2+ Kg1 12.Nxd1+ Kh1 13.Nf2+ Kg1 14.Ne4+ Kh1 15.Nf2+ Kg1 16.Ng4+ Kh1 *
  </code></pre>
  <p>This can also be seen as a royal fork constantly attacking the black king, but windmill contains and &quot;mechanic&quot; that allows the knight to do whatever it wants but black is still restricted to move his king back and forth.</p>
  <p>A second example is <a href="https://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/windmill" rel="noreferrer">this article.</a></p>
  <p>The other type of windmill is of <a href="http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1100063" rel="noreferrer">this game</a>. Starts at move 26, white does a windmill this time with rook and a bishop.</p>
  <p>I want to know if you can share more types of windmills with me. I realized you can substitute the bishop that remains still in both tecniques (B+R &amp; B+N) with a queen carrying out the same function. So I have 4 types. Do you know similar positions?</p>
  <p>PD: I realized also that if I change the bishop for a queen that allows sometimes checkmate, for example smothered checkmate can be seen as a windmill with the queen.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T01:16:13.630Z
Comments.Text: It's better not to involve the queen to begin with in these, as its role in any "windmill" will be the stationary piece. Then it's easier to classify. The windmill needs either a bishop or a rook as a stationary piece. Then we will need an additional moving piece. This moving piece can either be a rook, bishop or a knight. It should be possible to create a windmill for every possible combination of stationary and moving piece, except bishop+bishop.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Scounged
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T04:44:20.563Z
Comments.Text: Taking the rook is redundant since white cannot win any way, may as well just repeat moves with the double check
Comments.UserDisplayName: M.M
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-07-01T07:09:37.493Z
Comments.Text: @M.M whether there is a win in the concrete example given is completely irrelevant. The question is concerned with the motif itself, which is that the moving piece can take material without being met with any resistance.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Scounged
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-08-30T22:19:15.420Z
Comments.Text: (and as it happens there *is* a win, 12 Ne4+ and Ng3#)
Comments.UserDisplayName: Noam D. Elkies
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-08-31T18:14:44.653Z
Comments.Text: Q+R & R+R are also impossible where the discovered check is along a rank or file.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Rosie F
Tags: <tactics><windmill>
Title: How many windmills types exist in chess?
ThreadText: # How many windmills types exist in chess?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-06-30)
  
  I'm interested in chess patterns similar to the windmill. If you think there are none more than the ones that I'm listing I'm interested in a proof that satisfies me to stop looking for more of them. Wikipedia gives this definition for a windmill:
  
  In chess, a windmill is a tactic in which a combination of discovered
  checks and regular checks, usually by a rook and a bishop, can win
  massive amounts of material. This tactic is also sometimes referred to
  as a see-saw.
  
  I know two windmills. First the one in the "game of the century" between Fisher and Byrne (moves between 18 and 23 black does a windmill), it involves a bishop and a knight (also a rook, but it's not essential. For example see this game for a windmill knight-bishop without white rook.
  [FEN "K7/8/8/2B5/4N3/7q/6pp/3r1b1k w - - 0 9"]
  
  9.Nf2+ Kg1 10.Nxh3+ Kh1 11.Nf2+ Kg1 12.Nxd1+ Kh1 13.Nf2+ Kg1 14.Ne4+ Kh1 15.Nf2+ Kg1 16.Ng4+ Kh1 *
  
  This can also be seen as a royal fork constantly attacking the black king, but windmill contains and "mechanic" that allows the knight to do whatever it wants but black is still restricted to move his king back and forth.
  A second example is this article.
  The other type of windmill is of this game. Starts at move 26, white does a windmill this time with rook and a bishop.
  I want to know if you can share more types of windmills with me. I realized you can substitute the bishop that remains still in both tecniques (B+R & B+N) with a queen carrying out the same function. So I have 4 types. Do you know similar positions?
  PD: I realized also that if I change the bishop for a queen that allows sometimes checkmate, for example smothered checkmate can be seen as a windmill with the queen.
  
  **Tags:** tactics, windmill
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: It's better not to involve the queen to begin with in these, as its role in any "windmill" will be the stationary piece. Then it's easier to classify. The windmill needs either a bishop or a rook as a stationary piece. Then we will need an additional moving piece. This moving piece can either be a rook, bishop or a knight. It should be possible to create a windmill for every possible combination of stationary and moving piece, except bishop+bishop.  
  > **username_2**: Taking the rook is redundant since white cannot win any way, may as well just repeat moves with the double check  
  > **username_1**: @username_2 whether there is a win in the concrete example given is completely irrelevant. The question is concerned with the motif itself, which is that the moving piece can take material without being met with any resistance.  
  > **username_3**: (and as it happens there *is* a win, 12 Ne4+ and Ng3#)  
  > **username_4**: Q+R & R+R are also impossible where the discovered check is along a rank or file.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2016-09-06. Score: 10 | Accepted answer
  
  Yet more possibilities . . .
  : Two-way windmill, with either Rook or Bishop as the front piece;
  e.g. with a Rook:
  5n2/3bb2k/6pp/4B1pr/8/8/8/5RK1 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Rf7+ Kg8
  2. Rg7+ Kh8
  3. Rxe7+ Kg8
  4. Rg7+ Kh8
  5. Rxd7+ Kg8
  6. Rg7+ Kh8
  7. Rxg6+ Kh7
  8. Rg7+ Kh8
  9. Rxg5+ Kh7
  10. Rxh5
  
  (it's important to capture g5 last, else Black has Rh5xe5)
  : Windmill against a piece other than a King:
  5kr1/6pp/8/4N1p1/6p1/6P1/6BP/6K1 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Bd5! Rh8 
  2. Nf7! Rg8 
  3. Nxg5 Rh8 
  4. Nf7 Rg8 
  5. Ne5 Rh8 
  6. Nxg4
  
  (with better winning chances than the immediate 1 Nxg4)
  : That means that even the King can be the front piece of a
  windmill of sorts against a Knight:
  8/8/1n1p1p2/3K1k2/8/1P6/6B1/8 w - - 0 0
  
  1. Kc6! Na8
  2. Kxd6 Nb6
  3. Kc7
  
  (or first 3. Bb7 and then 4. Kc7(c6); if 1...Nc8 then 2 Bh3+ wins.)
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2016-07-01. Score: 5
  
  An example where the Bishop is the windmill piece.
  
  [fen "7R/kr4P1/5P2/4P3/3P4/b1P5/P1PP4/K2R4 b - - 0 0"]
  
  1...Bb2+ 2. Kb1 Bxc3+ 3. Kc1 Bb2+ 4. Kb1 Bxd4+ 5. Kc1 Bb2+ 6. Kb1 Bxe5+ 7. Kc1 Bb2+ 8. Kb1 Bxf6+ 9. Kc1 Bb2+ 10. Kb1 Bxg7+ 11. Kc1 Bb2+ 12. Kb1 Bxh8+
  
  Since the requirement is that the windmill and the discovered piece move differently that is two with Bishop, four with Knight, and two with Rook as the windmill piece, for a total of 8 types of windmill attacks.
  EDIT:  Inserting windmill position with Rook and Knight.
  
  
  [FEN "5rk1/R7/6N1/4p3/5p1p/8/8/K5R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. Nxh4+ Kh8 2. Ng6+ Kg8 3. Nxf4+ Kh8 4. Ng6+ Kg8 5. Nxe5+ Kh8 6. Ng6+ Kg8 7.
  Nxf8+ *
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: This answer is a bit confusing to me. Could you give two distinct types of different windmills with the bishop being the moving piece? I doubt it's possible if we don't differentiate between light-squared and dark-squared bishops. I get four distinct patterns: R+B, B+R, R+N, B+N, where the first mentioned piece in each pattern is the stationary piece in the windmill, and the second piece is the moving piece. I cannot see any more combinations than this. Note that I do not consider Q+B to be distinct from R+B.  
  > **username_6**: You definitely can't use a knight as the stationary piece, which I think is where the overcounting occurred. Either that, or the queen was counted twice, once orthogonally, and once diagonally, which as you point out, should not be considered distinct from the rook and the bishop respectively.  
  > **username_0**: List better the windmills more explained and I will accept the answer. I can't accept like this is confusing.  
  > **username_0**: Give examples of the windmills like the one you did. You will realize it's not so easy with knight and rook.  
  > **username_5**: I did count the checking piece being different as a different windmill, therefore my count is twice yours.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2020-11-05. Score: 4
  
  There is a game (Alekhine vs Fletcher, London simultaneous 1928) where knight and bishop win (with queen sacrifice).
  [FEN ""]
  [Event "Simul, 6b"]
  [Site "Gambit Chess Rooms, London ENG"]
  [Date "1928.06.08"]
  [EventDate "?"]
  [Round "?"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [White "Alexander Alekhine"]
  [Black "Alan Linnell Fletcher"]
  [ECO "A31"]
  [WhiteElo "?"]
  [BlackElo "?"]
  [PlyCount "63"]
  [StartPly "50"]
  
  1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d4 Nc6 4. d5 Nb8 5. Nc3 d6 6. g3 g6
  7. Bg2 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. Bf4 h6 10. Qd2 Kh7 11. e4 Nh5 12. Be3
  Nd7 13. Rae1 Rb8 14. Nh4 Ndf6 15. h3 Ng8 16. g4 Nhf6 17. f4 e6
  18. Nf3 exd5 19. cxd5 b5 20. e5 b4 21. Nd1 Ne4 22. Qd3 f5
  23. e6 Qa5 24. gxf5 gxf5 25. Nh4 Ba6 26. Qxe4 fxe4 27. Bxe4+
  Kh8 28. Ng6+ Kh7 29. Nxf8+ Kh8 30. Ng6+ Kh7 31. Ne5+ Kh8
  32. Nf7# 1-0
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2016-08-30. Score: 2
  
  I do not have to time to create a diagram of every type, but it seems intuitive to me that it would be possible to contrive a windmill from any pair of (non-pawn) pieces where:
  
  * The stationary piece is a slider
  * The moving piece is any other type of piece not capable of attacking along the axis at which the stationary piece will give check
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_9 on 2019-06-06. Score: 0
  
  I have compiled a complete list of all types of windmills. A windmill, known as a "zwickmühle" in Germany, is a sequence of attacks and discovered attacks performed by two pieces, one stationary and the other moving, on an opponent's piece, most often the King, used to gain material.
  Two principles define the structure of a windmill.
  
  The stationary piece is one with infinite range, meaning it will be either a bishop, a rook, or a queen.
  
  Excluding kings, it is not possible for the moving piece to attack in the same direction as the stationary piece. The moving piece moves opposite the attacking direction of the stationary piece.
  
  
  I am utilizing chess problems to demonstrate each and every type. There are two categories based on the stationary piece's attacking line, which are vertical/horizontal and diagonal. The moving piece is listed first followed by the stationary piece.
  Vertical/horizontal Stationery Pieces
  Bishop+Rook
  [Title "Alfred O. Karlström, Die Schwalbe 02/1940, Mate In 13"]
  [FEN "k2K2n1/Bp6/1p6/1pp5/R2p4/4p3/5p2/6b1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. Ra2 Bh2 2. Bxb6+ Kb8 3. Ba7+ Ka8 4. Bxc5+ Kb8 5. Ba7+ Ka8 6. Bxd4+ Kb8 7.  Ba7+ Ka8 8. Bxe3+ Kb8 9. Ba7+ Ka8 10. Bxf2+ Kb8 11. Ba7+ Ka8 12. Bg1+ Kb8 13.  Bxh2#
  
  Source: The Die Schwalbe Chess Problem Database
  Bishop+Queen
  [Title "Ārons Ņimcovičs, Unknown Publication 1925, Mate In 13"]
  [FEN "4r1k1/5p2/R5BQ/5p2/4p3/3n4/b1n4K/br6 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. Bh7+ Kh8 2. Bxf5+ Kg8 3. Bh7+ Kh8 4. Bxe4+ Kg8 5. Bh7+ Kh8 6. Bxd3+ Kg8 7.  Bh7+ Kh8 8. Bxc2+ Kg8 9. Bh7+ Kh8 10. Bxb1+ Kg8 11. Rg6+ fxg6 12. Bxa2+ Re6 13. Bxe6#
  
  Source: Yet Another Chess Problem Database
  Knight+Rook/Queen
  See Mike Jone’s answer.
  Diagonal Stationery Pieces
  Rook+Bishop/Queen
  [Title "Josef Krejcik, Wiener Schachzeitung 2/1925 On Pages 41-42, White Wins"]
  [FEN "5nk1/nbnbnbrR/6bn/6n1/6b1/2B3n1/1K4b1/r5n1 w KQkq - 0 1"]
  
  1. Rxg7+ Kh8 2. Rxf7+ Kg8 3. Rg7+ Kh8 4. Rxe7+ Kg8 5. Rg7+ Kh8 6. Rxd7+ Kg8 7.  Rg7+ Kh8 8. Rxc7+ Kg8 9. Rg7+ Kh8 10. Rxb7+ Kg8 11. Rg7+ Kh8 12. Rxa7+ Kg8 13.  Rg7+ Kh8 14. Rxg6+ Kh7 15. Rg7+ Kh8 16. Rxg5+ Kh7 17. Rg7+ Kh8 18. Rxg4+ Kh7 19.  Rg7+ Kh8 20. Rxg3+ Kh7 21. Rg7+ Kh8 22. Rxg2+ Kh7 23. Rg7+ Kh8 24. Rxg1+ Kh7 25. Rg7+ Kh8 26. Kxa1 Nh7 27. Rg6+ Nf6 28. Rxh6+ Kg7 29. Rxf6
  
  Source: Edward Winter’s Chess Notes article entitled "The Chess Seesaw"
  Knight+Bishop/Queen
  [Title "M. Kwiatkowski, The Problemist 1992, Mate In 29"]
  [FEN "3n4/rBp1p3/2P5/2PK4/k2N4/pp2R3/bppB2Rp/q1n1r1b1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. Rg4 h1=Q+ 2. Nf3+ Kb5 3. Rb4+ Ka5 4. Rbe4+ Kb5 5. Nd4+ Ka4 6. Ne2+ Kb5 7. Nc3+ Ka5 8. Nxa2+ Kb5 9. Nc3+ Ka5 10. Ne2+ Kb5 11. Nd4+ Ka4 12. Nf3+ Kb5 13. Rb4+ Ka5 14. Rbxb3+ Ka4 15. Rb4+ Ka5 16. Rbe4+ Kb5 17. Nd4+ Ka4 18. Ne2+ Kb5 19. Nc3+ Ka5 20. Na2+ Kb5 21. Ba6+ Rxa6 22. Nc3+ Ka5 23. Ne2+ Kb5 24. Nd4+ Ka4 25. Nf3+ Kb5 26. Rb4+ Ka5 27. Rb6+ Ka4 28. Rxa6+ Kb5 29. Ra5#
  
  Source: Tim Krabbe's Website Diary Entry #270
  King+Bishop/Queen
  See username_3's answer.
  
  
  ---
  
  