Answers.Body: <p>&quot;Bishop pair&quot; is a chess term indicating you have the <em>pair of bishops</em> - i.e. one bishop covering the light squares and one bishop covering the dark squares. If, after a3, Black plays ...Bxc3 and White responds with bxc3, then Black has lost the bishop pair because they only have one bishop left. Meanwhile, White still has both bishops, so they have the bishop pair.</p>
  <p>The bishop pair is in general a small advantage, but it's still an advantage. In particular, you can control every square on the board with one of your two bishops. With only one bishop, there'll always be squares you can't control.</p>
  <p>Example:</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;rnb1k2r/1p1p1ppp/4pq2/8/8/3B4/PPP1QPPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - 0 13&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>White has the Bishop pair, which is a significant advantage in this position because Black has difficulty defending the weak squares on b6, c7, d6, c5, and e5. (Plus bishops are just better than knights in open positions like this one where the center is not blocked by pawns.)</p>
  <p>Technical note: it's unclear if two bishops on the same color still counts as the bishop pair. Certainly most of the strategy associated with having the bishop pair does not apply in this case. It's very rare to have two bishops on the same color, as well.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T09:15:18.330Z
Answers.Text: Thank you. That's a really clear explanation. Given the context is a tutorial, it is arguable this should have been explained in the text :)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Stewart
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T11:46:48.400Z
Answers.Text: Great answer.  The two bishops are especially valuable in open positions, even more so in endings.  It also doesn't seem to require any special knowledge or technique to get some advantage with them.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T17:04:53.867Z
Answers.Text: Minor edit: *"you can control every square on the board with a bishop"*  Think you meant a *"bishop pair"* there.  Or maybe *"can't"* instead of *"can"*?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Darrel Hoffman
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T18:29:27.343Z
Answers.Text: @DarrelHoffman If you have a bishop pair, then you can control every square on the board with a bishop (one of the two that you have).
Answers.UserDisplayName: ajd
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T21:38:11.300Z
Answers.Text: @ajd Yes, exactly.  But the sentence currently reads just "bishop" and not "bishop pair", which is incorrect.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Darrel Hoffman
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-03T00:36:23.880Z
Answers.Text: ajd's interpretation was what I meant, but I can see how the sentence is mildly ambiguous. Edited.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Allure
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-09-02T08:52:09.813Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-09-03T00:35:57.823Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-09-03T00:35:57.823Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Allure
Body: <p>This is a screenshot from a chess.com tutorial.</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/M3nlg.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/M3nlg.jpg" alt="screenshot" /></a></p>
  <p>In the final sentence it says,</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>White will often gain the bishop pair after 5. a3, with a sharp struggle ahead.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Obviously a3 is the pawn attacking the bishop which is pinning the knight, but I'm missing what &quot;bishop pair&quot; means. Assuming that bishop on b4 is one of the pair, does it mean:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>A pair of bishops, in which case which is the other bishop, and where is the gain?</li>
  <li>The bishop and pinned knight form a pair, which will be traded via Bc3 then bxc3, in which case, again, where is the gain? Black has destroyed the pawn structure, but not gained material. Besides, the text says that white makes the gain, not black.</li>
  <li>The black bishop retreats from the pawn, and somehow white makes a gain from it. In which, please help me see that sequence. Does white gain two bishops?</li>
  <li>Something else? Perhaps &quot;bishop pair&quot; is an idiom?</li>
  </ul>
  
Tags: <opening><french-defense>
Title: Definition: What is meant by "bishop pair" in this context?
ThreadText: # Definition: What is meant by "bishop pair" in this context?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-09-02)
  
  This is a screenshot from a chess.com tutorial.
  
  [![screenshot](https://i.sstatic.net/M3nlg.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/M3nlg.jpg)
  
  In the final sentence it says,
  
  > White will often gain the bishop pair after 5. a3, with a sharp struggle ahead.
  
  Obviously a3 is the pawn attacking the bishop which is pinning the knight, but I'm missing what "bishop pair" means. Assuming that bishop on b4 is one of the pair, does it mean:
  
  * A pair of bishops, in which case which is the other bishop, and where is the gain?
  * The bishop and pinned knight form a pair, which will be traded via Bc3 then bxc3, in which case, again, where is the gain? Black has destroyed the pawn structure, but not gained material. Besides, the text says that white makes the gain, not black.
  * The black bishop retreats from the pawn, and somehow white makes a gain from it. In which, please help me see that sequence. Does white gain two bishops?
  * Something else? Perhaps "bishop pair" is an idiom?
  
  **Tags:** opening, french-defense
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-09-02. Score: 8 | Accepted answer
  
  "Bishop pair" is a chess term indicating you have the pair of bishops - i.e. one bishop covering the light squares and one bishop covering the dark squares. If, after a3, Black plays ...Bxc3 and White responds with bxc3, then Black has lost the bishop pair because they only have one bishop left. Meanwhile, White still has both bishops, so they have the bishop pair.
  The bishop pair is in general a small advantage, but it's still an advantage. In particular, you can control every square on the board with one of your two bishops. With only one bishop, there'll always be squares you can't control.
  Example:
  [FEN "rnb1k2r/1p1p1ppp/4pq2/8/8/3B4/PPP1QPPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - 0 13"]
  
  White has the Bishop pair, which is a significant advantage in this position because Black has difficulty defending the weak squares on b6, c7, d6, c5, and e5. (Plus bishops are just better than knights in open positions like this one where the center is not blocked by pawns.)
  Technical note: it's unclear if two bishops on the same color still counts as the bishop pair. Certainly most of the strategy associated with having the bishop pair does not apply in this case. It's very rare to have two bishops on the same color, as well.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thank you. That's a really clear explanation. Given the context is a tutorial, it is arguable this should have been explained in the text :)  
  > **username_2**: Great answer.  The two bishops are especially valuable in open positions, even more so in endings.  It also doesn't seem to require any special knowledge or technique to get some advantage with them.  
  > **username_3**: Minor edit: *"you can control every square on the board with a bishop"*  Think you meant a *"bishop pair"* there.  Or maybe *"can't"* instead of *"can"*?  
  > **username_4**: @DarrelHoffman If you have a bishop pair, then you can control every square on the board with a bishop (one of the two that you have).  
  > **username_3**: @username_4 Yes, exactly.  But the sentence currently reads just "bishop" and not "bishop pair", which is incorrect.  
  > **username_1**: username_4's interpretation was what I meant, but I can see how the sentence is mildly ambiguous. Edited.  
  
  ---
  
  