Answers.Body: <p>What you get from the books/databases during your correspondece games is the same as what you get when you read them generally. You can make use of</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Opening lines, which become more important as the games get slower and slower</li>
  <li>Tactics, which you may encounter during your games</li>
  <li>Positional concepts and maneuvers, which play the most important part of a correspondence game</li>
  <li>Endgames, though usually tablebases (7-man) are allowed in correspondence games.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>All of these (not including tablebases) are allowed because they are simply undiscoverable in a cheating investigation (for example, you can expect perfect opening play from any player), as well as to help you, as you stated.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-01-02T16:58:57.393Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-01-02T16:58:57.393Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Wais Kamal
Answers.Body: <p>Using theory sources like books just saves you having to do the theoretical research yourself. So it'll help you win more correspondence games, but not necessarily improve your skills.</p>
  
  <p>On the one hand, using theory books teaches you what high-quality opening play looks like. On the other hand, you're not really thinking yourself.</p>
  
  <p>I would recommend spending time thinking what to play on your own. After you've reached a decision, <em>then</em> check the book to see how your move and theirs compares. After that, play whichever move you prefer.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-01-07T06:27:44.047Z
Answers.Text: That's actually the way I'm currently using theory resources
Answers.UserDisplayName: markusw
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-01-05T00:53:46.993Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-01-05T00:53:46.993Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Body: <p>I'm playing daily games on chess.com and read that it's officially allowed to use books or databases during the game.</p>
  
  <p>My question is: How does it help me getting better (if it's the purpose of this allowance) to use theory sources in daily games? </p>
  
Tags: <online><correspondence-chess>
Title: What's the benefit of using books during correspondence games?
ThreadText: # What's the benefit of using books during correspondence games?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-01-02)
  
  I'm playing daily games on chess.com and read that it's officially allowed to use books or databases during the game.
  
  My question is: How does it help me getting better (if it's the purpose of this allowance) to use theory sources in daily games?
  
  **Tags:** online, correspondence-chess
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-01-02. Score: 2
  
  What you get from the books/databases during your correspondece games is the same as what you get when you read them generally. You can make use of
  
  * Opening lines, which become more important as the games get slower and slower
  * Tactics, which you may encounter during your games
  * Positional concepts and maneuvers, which play the most important part of a correspondence game
  * Endgames, though usually tablebases (7-man) are allowed in correspondence games.
  
  All of these (not including tablebases) are allowed because they are simply undiscoverable in a cheating investigation (for example, you can expect perfect opening play from any player), as well as to help you, as you stated.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-01-05. Score: 1
  
  Using theory sources like books just saves you having to do the theoretical research yourself. So it'll help you win more correspondence games, but not necessarily improve your skills.
  
  On the one hand, using theory books teaches you what high-quality opening play looks like. On the other hand, you're not really thinking yourself.
  
  I would recommend spending time thinking what to play on your own. After you've reached a decision, *then* check the book to see how your move and theirs compares. After that, play whichever move you prefer.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: That's actually the way I'm currently using theory resources  
  
  ---
  
  