Answers.Body: <p>I am still not sure whether this answers your question, but: Scandinavian tends to lead to more open/tactical games while the Dutch tends to lead to more closed/positional games. If you want to profile openings I suggest to take a database and check game positions of master players around move 10-15 and see whether you like any of those positions.</p>
  
  <p>But anyway (and this is not meant to be condescending; I know I wrote this before to one of your other questions): if you want to improve in chess forget about all those openings for the time being and focus on not losing pieces in one move. This will give you much better chess than if you learn some opening lines by heart, without understanding the ideas behind the openings. As a second step, learn some general principles (good, bad pieces, development, ...) At move 16 both players blundered their queen and worrying about opening theory at this level is-to be honest-a waste of time.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T14:05:05.890Z
Answers.Text: Yep! Thanks for suggestions. I shall be following it in.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-26T11:20:46.050Z
Answers.Text: However you Answer lacks perception, I really appreciate your effort! I see 33.* Rb4+ as blundered move, can't foresee as you see, anything further.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-26T11:24:07.827Z
Answers.Text: Would that says something rather Blundered,- like Desperado as you didn't mentioned about that.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-12-11T22:11:02.007Z
Answers.Text: Its a blundered move. I hope type of `pin` for Knight which is, tidily is, `one cannot cut the Knight by Pawn, if Knight put check and it is guarded.` Over and above if Queen Caught else as discussed in this topic `Nxc3+`,-
   [Discovered Check](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/16366/check-by-knight-nxc3-move-implications)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-12-11T22:13:10.987Z
Answers.Text: Was anticipating someone say something over here, much disappointed.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-01-12T18:43:53.693Z
Answers.Text: It depends on the dutch though. A leningrad dutch probably will be more tactical than a most scandinavians.
Answers.UserDisplayName: CognisMantis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T14:02:23.073Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-03-28T14:02:23.073Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1583209
Body: <p>If the game had played between to GM which game progresses to more steps if pgn notion tends more defensive approach with less blunders.</p>
  <p>Just for recap</p>
  <p>Scandinavian defense <code>ECO B01</code></p>
  <pre><code>[fen &quot;&quot;]
  1. e4 d5
  </code></pre>
  <p>Dutch defense <code>ECO A80</code></p>
  <pre><code>[fen &quot;&quot;]
  1.d4 f5
  </code></pre>
  <p>Both openings are quite unbalancing. Which opening would lead to a longer game, and why would this be so?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T13:22:04.490Z
Comments.Text: What is your question?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Herb
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T13:23:20.930Z
Comments.Text: Steps, which one progress more steps considering defensive metrics.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T13:43:04.967Z
Comments.Text: It is not clear what you are asking, and also I don't see why you would mix Scandinavian with Dutch defense in one question as they are very different openings.
Comments.UserDisplayName: user1583209
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T13:46:56.250Z
Comments.Text: I am just profiling by comparing chess openings from one another, on which I'm curious on this two over here.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-03-28T18:26:12.337Z
Comments.Text: What are "steps" and what is "progressing steps" and what are "defensive metrics"?
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Tags: <analysis><scandinavian-defense><dutch-defense>
Title: Considering Scandinavian defense versus Dutch defense
ThreadText: # Considering Scandinavian defense versus Dutch defense
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2017-03-28)
  
  If the game had played between to GM which game progresses to more steps if pgn notion tends more defensive approach with less blunders.
  Just for recap
  Scandinavian defense ECO B01
  [fen ""]
  1. e4 d5
  
  Dutch defense ECO A80
  [fen ""]
  1.d4 f5
  
  Both openings are quite unbalancing. Which opening would lead to a longer game, and why would this be so?
  
  **Tags:** analysis, scandinavian-defense, dutch-defense
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: What is your question?  
  > **username_0**: Steps, which one progress more steps considering defensive metrics.  
  > **username_2**: It is not clear what you are asking, and also I don't see why you would mix Scandinavian with Dutch defense in one question as they are very different openings.  
  > **username_0**: I am just profiling by comparing chess openings from one another, on which I'm curious on this two over here.  
  > **username_3**: What are "steps" and what is "progressing steps" and what are "defensive metrics"?  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2017-03-28. Score: 5
  
  I am still not sure whether this answers your question, but: Scandinavian tends to lead to more open/tactical games while the Dutch tends to lead to more closed/positional games. If you want to profile openings I suggest to take a database and check game positions of master players around move 10-15 and see whether you like any of those positions.
  
  But anyway (and this is not meant to be condescending; I know I wrote this before to one of your other questions): if you want to improve in chess forget about all those openings for the time being and focus on not losing pieces in one move. This will give you much better chess than if you learn some opening lines by heart, without understanding the ideas behind the openings. As a second step, learn some general principles (good, bad pieces, development, ...) At move 16 both players blundered their queen and worrying about opening theory at this level is-to be honest-a waste of time.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Yep! Thanks for suggestions. I shall be following it in.  
  > **username_0**: However you Answer lacks perception, I really appreciate your effort! I see 33.* Rb4+ as blundered move, can't foresee as you see, anything further.  
  > **username_0**: Would that says something rather Blundered,- like Desperado as you didn't mentioned about that.  
  > **username_0**: Its a blundered move. I hope type of `pin` for Knight which is, tidily is, `one cannot cut the Knight by Pawn, if Knight put check and it is guarded.` Over and above if Queen Caught else as discussed in this topic `Nxc3+`,-  [Discovered Check](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/16366/check-by-knight-nxc3-move-implications)  
  > **username_0**: Was anticipating someone say something over here, much disappointed.  
  > **username_4**: It depends on the dutch though. A leningrad dutch probably will be more tactical than a most scandinavians.  
  
  ---
  
  