Answers.Body: <p>Some things that are probably part of the answer, but probably not complete and concrete enough:</p>
  
  <p><em>1...a6 won't come.</em> There is no threat to a pawn on e5, the knight isn't pinned, the only point of 3.Bb5 is to exchange it on c6. So black doesn't waste a tempo on forcing white to do what he was already going to do.</p>
  
  <p>On the other hand, black has a choice to make, between ...bxc6 and ...dxc6. By taking earlier, white can see which way black goes and set up his pieces accordingly. If, in contrast, he takes later, black can first see where white puts his pieces and then choose which way to take. So since it's going to happen anyway, better do it immediately and not give out more information just yet.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-15T13:13:59.383Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-16T11:05:51.407Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-16T11:05:51.407Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.Body: <p>A few things:</p>
  
  <p>1) White's actually not wasting any tempi. He has to move his bishop out anyway (in order to castle). Then, once on b5, taking on c6 doesn't waste a tempo since Black has to spend a tempo recapturing.</p>
  
  <p>2) The doubled c-pawns are more of a big deal than they'd be in, say, the Ruy Lopez Exchange variation. Since Black has a pawn on c5 instead of c7, the weakness of the doubled pawns is more prominent.</p>
  
  <p>3) You're right that White's giving up the bishop pair. This is the main reason the Bb5 systems are not the main line, and instead playing an early d4 is. It's really a matter of taste: if you believe giving your opponent doubled pawns is worth sacrificing the bishop pair, you should play the Bb5 system. Many people don't believe this.</p>
  
  <p>4) As for not waiting for ...a6, White has to take action before Black changes the situation. For example, he may play ...Nd4 after developing more, or he may protect the c6-knight with a piece (e.g., ...Qc7), thus preventing White from giving Black doubled pawns.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-15T23:11:43.937Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-15T23:18:31.397Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-15T23:18:31.397Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.Body: <p>A lot of it is simply to create an imbalance. Nakamura has mentioned this before about a different opening B-for-N trade, and sometimes it is done without even getting doubled pawns in return, like an early Bg4 in the Slav then putting the pawns on c6 d5 and e6 to retain some control of the light squares. </p>
  
  <p>Even in the Caro-Kan Two-Knights variation you see the same trade: 1.e4 c6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Nf3 Bg4 and the B is often traded off after 4.h3 Bf3 5.Qf3 (In the 1960 World Championship match against Botvinnik, Tal even played 5.gf to imbalance the position even more. )</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-15T15:03:25.977Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-15T15:03:25.977Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>The main reason is that White does not want to face <code>Nd4</code>in many lines. They want to make sure they will "hurt" Black's pawn structure with <code>Bxc6</code>.</p>
  
  <p>Compare this line with others where the Black knight is actually pinned, like <code>3...d6</code> for instance. There, White has no reason to hurry and trade so quickly</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-16T07:52:17.313Z
Answers.Text: There's not necessarily no hurry, as Black may defend the knight with ...Bd7, removing the possibility of White giving him doubled pawns.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-16T09:30:14.543Z
Answers.Text: True, but that's also not a great square for the black bishop!
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-17T03:29:30.460Z
Answers.Text: But if Black pushes ...a6, the d7-bishop will recapture on c6 if White plays Bxc6. If White retreats his b5-bishop then he's wasted time, and the d7-bishop could relocate (though I don't think d7 is such a poor square).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-17T08:35:19.457Z
Answers.Text: @InertialIgnorance White can have a pretty good position after ```4.0-0 Bd7 5. Re1 a6 6.Bxc6 Bxc6 7.d4```, getting some extra space and development and starting to create some "threats" like an eventual ```Nxc6```or ```e5```
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-17T09:47:29.523Z
Answers.Text: Yes that position gives him some activity and is a fairly popular line (nevertheless it should be objectively equal though). Given that, I agree with what you said about White not needing to hurry with Bxc6, but not because he can wait and give Black doubled pawns at any time. Rather, he can go for the line you gave and get some activity.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Inertial Ignorance
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-17T10:24:56.180Z
Answers.Text: @InertialIgnorance Sure. Chess is always about trade-offs. Black could also play ```3.Qb6```and forget about the doubled pawns forever, but that's bad for other reasons
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-09-16T07:19:30.517Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-16T07:19:30.517Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: David
Body: <p>Isn't White giving up too much, i.e. one tempo in the opening and the bishop pair, for too little, i.e. doubled pawns?</p>
  
  <p>For example, after</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  
  1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 g6
  </code></pre>
  
  <ol start="4">
  <li>Bc6 is the second option in Lichess Masters database.</li>
  </ol>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-09-15T12:01:35.140Z
Comments.Text: That said, this question could be improved by giving a concrete example.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-09-16T12:38:00.717Z
Comments.Text: People who study endings learn to think logically. People who study middlegames learn to think creatively. People who study openings learn how to win a pawn.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Jossie Calderon
Tags: <opening><sicilian-defense><doubled-pawn><development><bishop-pair>
Title: In Bb5 systems against the Sicilian, why does White exchange their b5 bishop without playing a6?
ThreadText: # In Bb5 systems against the Sicilian, why does White exchange their b5 bishop without playing a6?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-09-15)
  
  Isn't White giving up too much, i.e. one tempo in the opening and the bishop pair, for too little, i.e. doubled pawns?
  For example, after
  [FEN ""]
  
  1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 g6
  
  
  Bc6 is the second option in Lichess Masters database.
  
  **Tags:** opening, sicilian-defense, doubled-pawn, development, bishop-pair
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: That said, this question could be improved by giving a concrete example.  
  > **username_2**: People who study endings learn to think logically. People who study middlegames learn to think creatively. People who study openings learn how to win a pawn.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-09-15. Score: 14
  
  Some things that are probably part of the answer, but probably not complete and concrete enough:
  
  *1...a6 won't come.* There is no threat to a pawn on e5, the knight isn't pinned, the only point of 3.Bb5 is to exchange it on c6. So black doesn't waste a tempo on forcing white to do what he was already going to do.
  
  On the other hand, black has a choice to make, between ...bxc6 and ...dxc6. By taking earlier, white can see which way black goes and set up his pieces accordingly. If, in contrast, he takes later, black can first see where white puts his pieces and then choose which way to take. So since it's going to happen anyway, better do it immediately and not give out more information just yet.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-09-15. Score: 7
  
  A few things:
  
  1) White's actually not wasting any tempi. He has to move his bishop out anyway (in order to castle). Then, once on b5, taking on c6 doesn't waste a tempo since Black has to spend a tempo recapturing.
  
  2) The doubled c-pawns are more of a big deal than they'd be in, say, the Ruy Lopez Exchange variation. Since Black has a pawn on c5 instead of c7, the weakness of the doubled pawns is more prominent.
  
  3) You're right that White's giving up the bishop pair. This is the main reason the Bb5 systems are not the main line, and instead playing an early d4 is. It's really a matter of taste: if you believe giving your opponent doubled pawns is worth sacrificing the bishop pair, you should play the Bb5 system. Many people don't believe this.
  
  4) As for not waiting for ...a6, White has to take action before Black changes the situation. For example, he may play ...Nd4 after developing more, or he may protect the c6-knight with a piece (e.g., ...Qc7), thus preventing White from giving Black doubled pawns.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-09-15. Score: 4
  
  A lot of it is simply to create an imbalance. Nakamura has mentioned this before about a different opening B-for-N trade, and sometimes it is done without even getting doubled pawns in return, like an early Bg4 in the Slav then putting the pawns on c6 d5 and e6 to retain some control of the light squares.
  
  Even in the Caro-Kan Two-Knights variation you see the same trade: 1.e4 c6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Nf3 Bg4 and the B is often traded off after 4.h3 Bf3 5.Qf3 (In the 1960 World Championship match against Botvinnik, Tal even played 5.gf to imbalance the position even more. )
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-09-16. Score: 4
  
  The main reason is that White does not want to face `Nd4`in many lines. They want to make sure they will "hurt" Black's pawn structure with `Bxc6`.
  
  Compare this line with others where the Black knight is actually pinned, like `3...d6` for instance. There, White has no reason to hurry and trade so quickly
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: There's not necessarily no hurry, as Black may defend the knight with ...Bd7, removing the possibility of White giving him doubled pawns.  
  > **username_5**: True, but that's also not a great square for the black bishop!  
  > **username_3**: But if Black pushes ...a6, the d7-bishop will recapture on c6 if White plays Bxc6. If White retreats his b5-bishop then he's wasted time, and the d7-bishop could relocate (though I don't think d7 is such a poor square).  
  > **username_5**: @InertialIgnorance White can have a pretty good position after ```4.0-0 Bd7 5. Re1 a6 6.Bxc6 Bxc6 7.d4```, getting some extra space and development and starting to create some "threats" like an eventual ```Nxc6```or ```e5```  
  > **username_3**: Yes that position gives him some activity and is a fairly popular line (nevertheless it should be objectively equal though). Given that, I agree with what you said about White not needing to hurry with Bxc6, but not because he can wait and give Black doubled pawns at any time. Rather, he can go for the line you gave and get some activity.  
  > **username_5**: @InertialIgnorance Sure. Chess is always about trade-offs. Black could also play ```3.Qb6```and forget about the doubled pawns forever, but that's bad for other reasons  
  
  ---
  
  