Answers.Body: <p>Could white have just played Bg4 from somewhere without capture? Black’s prior move was Ke5-e6. This can be fixed by a shifting wNg3 to e3 and wBd4 to g3 in its place. This stops other cooks where White has just given a discovered check. Adding a further wN on c6 also prevents any retractions with the White rook, and the Black king moving to e5.</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/3R2Kp/4kP1P/3R3P/6BP/4N1BP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>A key point is that retracting 1. e5xf6e.p. f7-f5 2. B~g4+ Kf5-e6 3. N~e3+ works, as wPe5 blocks wRd5 from attacking f5, and so bK on f5 only endures a single check (from wNe3).</p>
  <p>General chess problem solving engines e.g. Popeye don’t currently offer retraction capabilities. It might be possible to solve Edith Baird style retractors though, but not ones with retro logic.</p>
  <p>The database <a href="https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de" rel="nofollow noreferrer">pdb.dieschwalbe.de</a> contains lots of retractor problems. Type k='help retractor' in the search box, and hit Overview to begin your journey in this amazing resource.</p>
  <p><strong>Addendum #1 11/30/2020:</strong> Here is a sound version by Rewan, a correction of my above &quot;correction&quot;! It is certified correct by Mario Richter's Rawbats program. The above version is incorrect due to 1. Rf5-d5 being a possible last move for White as well, and, furthermore, multiple stalemating moves afterward.</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/3R2Kp/2N1kP1P/3R3P/3B2BP/6NP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p><strong>Addendum #2 11/30/2020:</strong> I found a bug with my earlier proposed version, and also a way to make this much more economical. The new solution is proved correct (aka &quot;C+&quot;) by Mario Richter's legendary Rawbats program.</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/3R2K1/4kP1P/3R3P/3P2BP/4N1BP/7P/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>White has made 15 pawn captures, so if the last move (which must have delivered check) was by an officer, then it was not a capture, so Black has no prior move, and the position is illegal. The only possible last move is en passant, R: 1. e5xf6ep# so we conclude that this definitely was the case.</p>
  <p>(For retractors, one does not need to prove that the prior move was definitely a double hop in order to allow the en passant retraction. In this case, the logic goes the other way round: the en passant proves the double hop.)</p>
  <p>Now the retraction goes R: 1. ... f7-f5 2. B~-g4+ Kf5-e6/Ke7-f6 3. S~e3+/R~-d7+ etc.</p>
  <p>Instead of the first retraction, White can play 1. Se3-f5= for stalemate.</p>
  <p>(It could be possible to generate this effect in a position in which White is not delivering check, or in which one can retract uniquely further.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-07-16T00:39:29.690Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-04-29T21:04:00.323Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2021-04-29T21:04:00.323Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.Body: <p>First attempt.</p>
  
  <p>If the White bishop is removed then it is stalemate which suggests that Black had a piece on g4 and White's last move was Bxg4++. He could retract this and play hxg4 stalemate instead.</p>
  
  <p>But White has made 14 pawn captures and Black has 2 pieces left. Hence there are no Black pieces left for the Bishop to take. Any White capture must have been made by a pawn. </p>
  
  <p>Second attempt</p>
  
  <p>This suggests that there was a Black pawn on f5 which had just made the move f7-f5 blocking the bishop check and White responded ef++. There is no White piece that can block the pawn on f5 and stop it moving hence to deliver stalemate White must take the pawn without check. Hence White replaces ef++ by Nxf5 stalemate.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-07-15T22:42:26.980Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-07-15T22:53:45.910Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-07-15T22:53:45.910Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Body: <p>I am trying to create a retraction problem, but I am unsure if it is sound, and I do not know where to find resources on them. I have two questions.</p>
  <ol>
  <li><p>Is my problem correct? I am not giving a solution as to leave it to you to decipher.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>Where can I find resources on how to make retraction problems?</p>
  </li>
  </ol>
  <p>I wish for feedback so I may better my creations of retraction problems.</p>
  <p><strong>White retracts a move and instead delivers stalemate.</strong></p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/3R2Kp/4kP1P/3R3P/3B2BP/6NP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  
Tags: <problems><retrograde-analysis><composing>
Title: Attempting to create a retraction problem
ThreadText: # Attempting to create a retraction problem
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-07-15)
  
  I am trying to create a retraction problem, but I am unsure if it is sound, and I do not know where to find resources on them. I have two questions.
  
  Is my problem correct? I am not giving a solution as to leave it to you to decipher.
  
  Where can I find resources on how to make retraction problems?
  
  
  I wish for feedback so I may better my creations of retraction problems.
  White retracts a move and instead delivers stalemate.
  [FEN "8/3R2Kp/4kP1P/3R3P/3B2BP/6NP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  **Tags:** problems, retrograde-analysis, composing
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-07-16. Score: 3 | Accepted answer
  
  Could white have just played Bg4 from somewhere without capture? Black’s prior move was Ke5-e6. This can be fixed by a shifting wNg3 to e3 and wBd4 to g3 in its place. This stops other cooks where White has just given a discovered check. Adding a further wN on c6 also prevents any retractions with the White rook, and the Black king moving to e5.
  [FEN "8/3R2Kp/4kP1P/3R3P/6BP/4N1BP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  A key point is that retracting 1. e5xf6e.p. f7-f5 2. B~g4+ Kf5-e6 3. N~e3+ works, as wPe5 blocks wRd5 from attacking f5, and so bK on f5 only endures a single check (from wNe3).
  General chess problem solving engines e.g. Popeye don’t currently offer retraction capabilities. It might be possible to solve Edith Baird style retractors though, but not ones with retro logic.
  The database pdb.dieschwalbe.de contains lots of retractor problems. Type k='help retractor' in the search box, and hit Overview to begin your journey in this amazing resource.
  Addendum #1 11/30/2020: Here is a sound version by Rewan, a correction of my above "correction"! It is certified correct by Mario Richter's Rawbats program. The above version is incorrect due to 1. Rf5-d5 being a possible last move for White as well, and, furthermore, multiple stalemating moves afterward.
  [FEN "8/3R2Kp/2N1kP1P/3R3P/3B2BP/6NP/P1P4P/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  Addendum #2 11/30/2020: I found a bug with my earlier proposed version, and also a way to make this much more economical. The new solution is proved correct (aka "C+") by Mario Richter's legendary Rawbats program.
  [FEN "8/3R2K1/4kP1P/3R3P/3P2BP/4N1BP/7P/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  White has made 15 pawn captures, so if the last move (which must have delivered check) was by an officer, then it was not a capture, so Black has no prior move, and the position is illegal. The only possible last move is en passant, R: 1. e5xf6ep# so we conclude that this definitely was the case.
  (For retractors, one does not need to prove that the prior move was definitely a double hop in order to allow the en passant retraction. In this case, the logic goes the other way round: the en passant proves the double hop.)
  Now the retraction goes R: 1. ... f7-f5 2. B~-g4+ Kf5-e6/Ke7-f6 3. S~e3+/R~-d7+ etc.
  Instead of the first retraction, White can play 1. Se3-f5= for stalemate.
  (It could be possible to generate this effect in a position in which White is not delivering check, or in which one can retract uniquely further.)
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-07-15. Score: 1
  
  First attempt.
  
  If the White bishop is removed then it is stalemate which suggests that Black had a piece on g4 and White's last move was Bxg4++. He could retract this and play hxg4 stalemate instead.
  
  But White has made 14 pawn captures and Black has 2 pieces left. Hence there are no Black pieces left for the Bishop to take. Any White capture must have been made by a pawn.
  
  Second attempt
  
  This suggests that there was a Black pawn on f5 which had just made the move f7-f5 blocking the bishop check and White responded ef++. There is no White piece that can block the pawn on f5 and stop it moving hence to deliver stalemate White must take the pawn without check. Hence White replaces ef++ by Nxf5 stalemate.
  
  
  ---
  
  