Answers.Body: <p>I have played against this opening a lot, sometimes in bullet sometimes in blitz games, and even in casual ones without the clock. some of the opponents were strong candidate masters and sometimes a FIDE master would use it. </p>
  
  <p>The easiest defense for me is <code>1...e5</code> and on <code>2.Bb2</code> to simply take on <code>b4</code>. This has several benefits:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>White is behind in development ( plays twice with the bishop );</li>
  <li>Black hinders White's fight for the center by keeping bishop on <code>a5-e1</code> diagonal. This is very effective method that simply squelches any initiative White has. He may be equal in the resulting <em>tabya</em> but that is all he gets, and frankly, I believe Black has an easier game;</li>
  <li>Black gets half-open <code>e-file</code> which is very useful, since he will play <code>...d5</code> and <code>...Re8</code> at some point, so he can count on <code>...d4</code> push to generate initiative;</li>
  <li>Being behind in development and restrained in center, White can't really use <code>b-file</code>;</li>
  <li>Since Black has development advantage, the opening of the game benefits him ( <code>...d4</code> push mentioned above is useful for this );</li>
  <li>All of the Black pieces can acquire <strong>best</strong> squares ( knights on <code>c6</code> and <code>f6</code>, bishops on <code>b4</code> and <code>g4</code> );</li>
  <li><strong>Black has no pawn weaknesses, nor weak pieces, while White has weak pawn at <code>a2</code>;</strong></li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>That is why I would advise you the above approach when battling the Sokolsky attack ( known also as Polish opening or Orangutan ). I have looked into <em>Fritz</em> opening database and found the lines I think give good game for Black in the easiest way ( I have added multiple hoices for Black so you can have a wider choice ). I am going to present them in the below diagram and will explain typical positions and plans afterwards.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[Title "Recommended theory for Sokolsky attack"]
  [fen "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
  
  1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 ( 2.a3 d5 3.Bb2 ( 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bb2 Bd6 5.Nf3 ( 5.c4 c6 6.Nf3 Qe7 7.Nc3 a6 ) 5...Qe7 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) 3...Bd6 4.e3 ( 4.Nf3 Qe7 5.e3 Nf6 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) ( 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4 ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 ) 4...Nf6 5.Nf3 ( 5.c4 c6 6.Nf3 Qe7 7.Nc3 a6 ) 5...Qe7 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) ( 2.b5 d5 3.Bb2 Bd6 4.e3 ( 4.Nf3 Qe7 ) ( 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4 ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 ) 4...Nf6 ) 2...Bxb4 3.Bxe5 Nf6 4.c4 ( 4.c3 Be7 ) ( 4.Nf3 O-O 5.e3 d5 ) 4...O-O 5.Nf3 ( 5.e3 d5 6.cxd5 ( 6.Nf3 c5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Be2 Nc6 9.Bb2 Bf5 ) ( 6.Qb3 c5 7.a3 Ba5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Bc4 Nb6 10.Be2 Nc6 11.Bb2 Be6 ) ( 6.a3 Ba5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 ) 6...Nxd5 7.Nf3 Re8 ( 7...Be7 8.a3 c5 9.Be2 Nc6 10.Bb2 b6 11.O-O Bb7 ) 8.Bb2 ( 8.Be2 Rxe5 9.Nxe5 Qf6 10.f4 Nxe3 11.Qb3 Nxg2+ 12.Kd1 Nxf4 13.Nxf7 Qxf7 14.Bc4 Be6 15.Bxe6 Nxe6 ) 8...Be7 ) 5...Nc6 6. Bb2 d5 7. cxd5 Nxd5 
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>OK, now you have thorough coverage of your repertoire with Black. I have tried to keep the number of lines to minimum, but <strong>all</strong> relevant White replies had to be covered. It is time to explain the ideas and plans in each separate position for Black:</p>
  
  <pre><code>[Title "White takes pawn at e5, Black takes pawn on b4"]
  [fen "r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/3n4/1b6/5N2/PB1PPPPP/RN1QKB1R w KQ - 0 8"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>In the above position Black has no weak pieces, he is not cramped and has development advantage. White on the other hand does have central pawn majority but he can't utilize it to gain initiative. The best he can do is <code>e3</code> so he can safely finish development. Notice the tremendous pressure <code>Bb4</code>+ <code>Nd5</code> exert on the White position by pressuring the dark squares ( <code>c3</code> and the entire <code>a5-e1</code> diagonal! ). <strong>This is the key idea of Black's defense in this, and similar positions -> to control <code>a5-e1</code> diagonal and the dark squares.</strong> Black is more than fine here and simply playing natural moves should give you satisfactory position. It is White who fights for equality here.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[Title "Tremendous exchange sacrifice for Black"]
  [fen "rn4k1/ppp2qpp/4n3/8/1b6/1Q6/P2P3P/RN1K3R w - - 0 16"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>This is one of the variations from the above diagram that is most complex but is easy to play with Black. Black has sacrificed the rook for a knight, bishop, two pawns and exposed White king. The compensation is more than enough and Black has a winning position in my opinion. Just develop <code>Nb8</code> and do not be afraid of <code>d4</code>, threatening to fork the knights with <code>d5</code>, because you have <code>...Rd8!</code> which pins the pawn and gives decisive initiative. White can't survive because of his exposed king and lag in development. Again, you are fine.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[Title "White plays the weak f4 attack"]
  [fen ""]
  
  1.b4 e5 2.a3 d5 3.Bb2 Bd6 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4-+ ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3-+ 11.Rxh2 $8 Ng4 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>The whole point of <code>f4</code> lines is to accept the pawn, gambit the rook on <code>h8</code> and smash White in the coming attack. These lines can be tricky so you could additionally analyze them with an engine, just to see how exactly can you capitalize on your advantage the easiest. Again, nothing to worry here, Black has a winning attack.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[Title "White doesn't take the Black's pawn at e5"]
  [fen "rnb1k2r/1p2qppp/p1pb1n2/3pp3/1PP5/P1N1PN2/1B1P1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 0 14"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Here, White is smart and doesn't wish to make early trouble. He will finish development first, and then will try to capitalize on his queenside space advantage. The most typical plan in similar pawn structures is <em>minority attack</em>. That is why Black played <code>...a6</code> at some point, to hinder this plan. </p>
  
  <p>Black will maintain his advantage in center, and will refute any type of wing play White bases. Remember the golden rules:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Attack in the center refutes the wing attack;</li>
  <li>Who controls the center, controls the wings too;</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>I would recommend you to study Orthodox defense of the QGD, and the Exchange variation of the QGD as positional transformations of the above position will have very similar plans like in the mentioned lines. <em>M.Sadler-Queen's Gambit Declined ( 2000 )</em> is dated but excellent starting point. The book is clearly written and explains all the plans that might crop up here. You might need to learn about Isolated Queen's Pawn, and <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/5023/strategy-in-isolated-queen-pawn-positions/5024#5024">my answer to this question</a> might be helpful as a starting point. For further reading I highly recommend <em>A.Soltis-Pawn Structure Chess ( 1995 )</em> as it is simply awesome.</p>
  
  <p>If you have further questions leave me a comment. Hopefully this helps.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-11-27T18:01:27.290Z
Answers.Text: I think that White is fine in your second diagram. Basically he is playing a Sicilian with a move in hand. He will play e3, Be2, and 0-0. Where then is Black's pressure, or his central play? Actually, in this line, I would want to hold back with ..Nc6 until I had played ..c5.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Philip Roe
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-11-28T02:25:12.513Z
Answers.Text: "Black has ***sacrificed*** the rook for a knight, bishop, two pawns . . ." Interesting use of the word "sacrifice". Kind of like sacrificing a rook for a queen.
Answers.UserDisplayName: bof
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-09-29T22:13:42.527Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-11-26T08:23:39.310Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-11-26T08:23:39.310Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: AlwaysLearningNewStuff
Answers.Body: <p>1.b4 is also known as the Sokolsky opening,and Sokolsky wrote a good book on it. It used to be thought that ..e5,2.Bb2 Bxb4 was the line that Black should NOT play, because it gave up the center. I used to play 1.b4 then, and got good results. I stopped (except for occasional outings) when it became generally known that ..e5 etc was a good line. Maybe you should play that, but it isn't quite as easy as people are saying. You have given up the center for piece activity, and you need to make energetic use of those pieces. If that does not appeal, then try a reversed Kings Indian Attack. (..e5,d6,Nf6,g6,Bg7)</p>
  
  <p>The 1..c6 line is very interesting, but nothing for White to be afraid of after 2.c4!, eg 2..Qb6 3.Qb3!</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-11-27T17:48:20.937Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-11-27T17:48:20.937Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Philip Roe
Answers.Body: <p>I usually answer 1... c6 which is a pretty good option if White continues with 2.Bb2. then game might continue with 2... a5 3.a3 axb4 4.axb4 Rxa1 5.Rxa1 Qb6 and now White has to make a choice how to defend the b4-pawn. I think that his best option is to give this pawn immediately with something like b5 or e3.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-11-26T10:31:14.177Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-11-26T11:12:50.750Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-11-26T11:12:50.750Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jonas Lenz
Answers.Body: <p>In the 1.b4 e5 line, Stockfish reaches some 30-40 centipawns advantage for black, so this could hardly be an opening to recommend, bearing in mind that
  it is <strong>white</strong> who should have the edge in the opening.
  If you want a quiet refutation, then just play 1...g6 and then fianchetto your king side bishop.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-11-28T08:43:27.573Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-11-28T08:43:27.573Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Lyudmil Tsvetkov
Answers.Body: <p>While I play Polish Opening, the same had happened to me as well, </p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>I somehow get tricked and lose my games against this opening.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>I don't know why most of them in chess.com opens either King's pawn or Queen's pawn always.</p>
  
  <p>But here my opponent was more cautious maybe that made me pity, however I won the game as he lost his time.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>To say, its look like fair most good variation considering Polish Defense,- "Polish Opening Outflank Variation"</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Here is the game <code>fen</code> for look upon, so you could see one way of developing principle for <code>Polish Opening Outflank Variation</code>,- <code>1.b4 c6</code></p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2017.12.02"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "KocouJo"]
  [WhiteElo "954"]
  [BlackElo "920"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [Termination "game_result.won_on_time"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [CurrentPosition "3B1b1r/1Q2pk1p/p4p2/1p4p1/4P2q/5KR1/P1r5/8 b - - 7 37"]
  
  1.b4 c6 2.g4 d5 3.e3 g5 4.Bb2 f6 5.Nf3 Bxg4 6.Rg1 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 Qd6 8.c3 Qxh2 9.Rg2 Qh1 10.Qg4 Nd7 11.d3 Nh6 12.Qg3 Ne5 13.Ke2 Qh5+ 14.Kd2 Nf3+ 15.Kc1 Nf5 16.Qc7 Nd6 17.Nd2 Rc8 18.Qa5 Nb5 19.Rg3 Nxd2 20.Kxd2 a6 21.Qb6 Rc7 22.c4 dxc4 23.dxc4 Qh4 24.cxb5 Qxb4+ 25.Bc3 Qd6+ 26.Ke2 cxb5 27.Ba5 Rc2+ 28.Kf3 Qd5+ 29.e4 Qe5 (30.Rd1) 30.Qxb7 Qxa1 31.Qb8+ Kf7 32.Bd8 Qxf1 33.Qb7 Qxf2+ 34.Kg4 Qe2+ 35.Kh3 Qh2+ 36.Kg4 Qh4+ 37.Kf3  1-0
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Here is another Game, at the end of game due to Time Constraint and some complexity opponent got detracted a bit.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2018.02.01"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "Jed_NZ"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [WhiteElo "973"]
  [BlackElo "986"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [EndTime "4:13:25 PST"]
  [Termination "bram-stokers won on time"]
  [CurrentPosition "8/3R2kp/3PQ1p1/1p3p2/4pP1P/8/7P/1K6 b - - 0 38"]
  
  1.b4 {[%clk 0:09:47]} e5 {[%clk 0:09:57]} 2.c3 {[%clk 0:09:39]} d5 {[%clk 0:09:53]} 3.d4 {[%clk 0:09:19]} e4 {[%clk 0:09:43]} 4.e3 {[%clk 0:09:13]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:09:37]} 5.Na3 {[%clk 0:09:05]} Bg4 {[%clk 0:09:34]} 6.Qb3 {[%clk 0:08:56]} a6 {[%clk 0:09:26]} 7.Nh3 {[%clk 0:08:41]} Bxh3 {[%clk 0:09:21]} 8.gxh3 {[%clk 0:08:36]} a5 {[%clk 0:08:53]} 9.Bd2 {[%clk 0:08:27]} axb4 {[%clk 0:08:44]} 10.cxb4 {[%clk 0:08:23]} Nc6 {[%clk 0:08:33]} 11.b5 {[%clk 0:08:17]} Nxd4 {[%clk 0:08:20]} 12.exd4 {[%clk 0:08:10]} Bxa3 {[%clk 0:08:01]} 13.Bb4 {[%clk 0:07:56]} Bxb4+ {[%clk 0:07:44]} 14.Qxb4 {[%clk 0:07:54]} b6 {[%clk 0:07:32]} 15.a4 {[%clk 0:07:44]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:06:52]} 16.O-O-O {[%clk 0:07:35]} Nb8 {[%clk 0:06:34]} 17.Be2 {[%clk 0:07:29]} c6 {[%clk 0:06:29]} 18.Rhg1 {[%clk 0:07:16]} g6 {[%clk 0:06:05]} 19.Rg5 {[%clk 0:07:04]} Qc7 {[%clk 0:05:52]} 20.Re5+ {[%clk 0:06:58]} Kd8 {[%clk 0:05:45]} 21.Bg4 {[%clk 0:06:48]} cxb5+ {[%clk 0:05:41]} 22.Kb1 {[%clk 0:06:33]} Rxa4 {[%clk 0:05:15]} 23.Rxd5+ {[%clk 0:06:29]} Ke8 {[%clk 0:04:57]} 24.Qxb5+ {[%clk 0:06:26]} Qc6 {[%clk 0:04:30]} 25.Bd7+ {[%clk 0:05:53]} Qxd7 {[%clk 0:03:13]} 26.Rxd7 {[%clk 0:05:46]} Nxd7 {[%clk 0:02:44]} 27.Qxa4 {[%clk 0:05:42]} Ke7 {[%clk 0:02:35]} 28.Re1 {[%clk 0:05:36]} f5 {[%clk 0:02:29]} 29.Qb4+ {[%clk 0:05:30]} Kf7 {[%clk 0:02:20]} 30.d5 {[%clk 0:05:22]} Ra8 {[%clk 0:01:43]} 31.f4 {[%clk 0:05:14]} Ra6 {[%clk 0:01:29]} 32.Qd6 {[%clk 0:05:07]} Ra7 {[%clk 0:00:47]} 33.Qe6+ {[%clk 0:05:00]} Kg7 {[%clk 0:00:45]} 34.d6 {[%clk 0:04:57]} b5 {[%clk 0:00:35]} 35.Rc1 {[%clk 0:04:52]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:00:06]} 36.h4 {[%clk 0:04:34]} Rc7 {[%clk 0:00:02]} 37.Rxc7+ {[%clk 0:04:27]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:00:00]} 38.Rxd7+ {[%clk 0:04:24]}  1-0
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Here is one another <code>Blitz Game</code> of 5 minutes time control per side, in which more inaccuracies or blunders can be denoted.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  [Event "Rated Blitz game"]
  [Site "https://lichess.org/IkU6jNFS"]
  [Date "2018.02.18"]
  [Round "-"]
  [White "BramStokers"]
  [Black "timjim77"]
  [Result "0-1"]
  [UTCDate "2018.02.18"]
  [UTCTime "00:34:55"]
  [WhiteElo "1500"]
  [BlackElo "1470"]
  [WhiteRatingDiff "-191"]
  [BlackRatingDiff "+8"]
  [Variant "Standard"]
  [TimeControl "300+0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [Opening "Polish Opening"]
  [Termination "Normal"]
  
  1. b4 { [%eval -0.09] [%clk 0:05:00] } 1... e5 { [%eval -0.09] [%clk 0:05:00] } 2. c3 { [%eval -0.7] [%clk 0:04:56] } 2... d5 { [%eval -0.7] [%clk 0:04:57] } 3. Na3 { [%eval -1.41] [%clk 0:04:49] } 3... Nf6 { [%eval -1.41] [%clk 0:04:52] } 4. e3 { [%eval -1.37] [%clk 0:04:43] } 4... Bd6 { [%eval -1.4] [%clk 0:04:49] } 5. g4 { [%eval -3.09] [%clk 0:04:41] } 5... Bxg4 { [%eval -3.07] [%clk 0:04:45] } 6. f3 { [%eval -3.37] [%clk 0:04:35] } 6... Bh5 { [%eval -3.39] [%clk 0:04:42] } 7. Qe2 { [%eval -3.87] [%clk 0:04:28] } 7... e4 { [%eval -2.82] [%clk 0:04:40] } 8. Bb2 { [%eval -3.5] [%clk 0:04:20] } 8... exf3 { [%eval -2.32] [%clk 0:04:38] } 9. Nxf3 { [%eval -2.57] [%clk 0:04:18] } 9... O-O { [%eval -2.28] [%clk 0:04:32] } 10. O-O-O { [%eval -2.84] [%clk 0:04:16] } 10... Re8 { [%eval -2.64] [%clk 0:04:28] } 11. Bh3 { [%eval -3.2] [%clk 0:04:10] } 11... Nbd7 { [%eval -3.24] [%clk 0:04:16] } 12. Rhg1 { [%eval -3.0] [%clk 0:04:07] } 12... Ne5 { [%eval -2.81] [%clk 0:04:14] } 13. Qg2 { [%eval -3.26] [%clk 0:03:56] } 13... Ng6 { [%eval -1.85] [%clk 0:04:02] } 14. Nh4 { [%eval -4.31] [%clk 0:03:47] } 14... Ne4 { [%eval -2.77] [%clk 0:03:45] } 15. Rdf1 { [%eval -6.09] [%clk 0:03:38] } 15... Qxh4 { [%eval -5.67] [%clk 0:03:43] } 16. Rf4 { [%eval -11.49] [%clk 0:03:21] } 16... Bxf4 { [%eval -11.0] [%clk 0:03:31] } 17. exf4 { [%eval -12.4] [%clk 0:03:18] } 17... Qxf4 { [%eval -10.77] [%clk 0:03:25] } 18. Rf1 { [%eval -10.67] [%clk 0:03:10] } 18... Qxd2+ { [%eval -7.6] [%clk 0:03:08] } 19. Kb1 { [%eval -16.45] [%clk 0:03:05] } 19... Qxg2 { [%eval -16.38] [%clk 0:03:02] } 20. Bxg2 { [%eval -16.16] [%clk 0:03:01] } 20... Nd2+ { [%eval -15.89] [%clk 0:02:59] } 21. Kc2 { [%eval -15.88] [%clk 0:02:56] } 21... Nxf1 { [%eval -15.4] [%clk 0:02:59] } 22. Bxf1 { [%eval -15.32] [%clk 0:02:55] } 22... Ne5 { [%eval -11.32] [%clk 0:02:55] } 23. Kd2 { [%eval -16.17] [%clk 0:02:52] } 23... Nc4+ { [%eval -14.29] [%clk 0:02:54] } 24. Kc1 { [%eval -58.6] [%clk 0:02:46] } 24... Nxb2 { [%eval -13.51] [%clk 0:02:52] } 25. Kxb2 { [%eval -13.0] [%clk 0:02:45] } 25... a5 { [%eval -12.11] [%clk 0:02:48] } 26. b5 { [%eval -13.37] [%clk 0:02:43] } 26... a4 { [%eval -11.95] [%clk 0:02:46] } 27. h4 { [%eval -15.41] [%clk 0:02:36] } 27... Re1 { [%eval -15.39] [%clk 0:02:43] } 28. Bd3 { [%eval -14.78] [%clk 0:02:30] } 28... Bg6 { [%eval -13.52] [%clk 0:02:41] } 29. Bc2 { [%eval -15.4] [%clk 0:02:25] } 29... Re2 { [%eval -13.7] [%clk 0:02:39] } 30. Kc1 { [%eval -24.76] [%clk 0:02:04] } 30... Bxc2 { [%eval -16.9] [%clk 0:02:36] } 31. Nxc2 { [%eval -15.13] [%clk 0:02:02] } 31... c5 { [%eval -13.62] [%clk 0:02:30] } 32. b6 { [%eval #-13] [%clk 0:01:59] } 32... d4 { [%eval #-13] [%clk 0:02:27] } 33. cxd4 { [%eval #-14] [%clk 0:01:57] } 33... cxd4 { [%eval -59.7] [%clk 0:02:27] } 34. Nxd4 { [%eval #-9] [%clk 0:01:55] } 34... Rxa2 { [%eval #-11] [%clk 0:02:26] } 35. Nb5 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:53] } 35... Rc8+ { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:02:21] } 36. Kb1 { [%eval #-5] [%clk 0:01:49] } 36... Rac2 { [%eval #-15] [%clk 0:02:17] } 37. Na7 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:46] } 37... Rc1+ { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:14] } 38. Kb2 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:44] } 38... R8c2+ { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:02:12] } 39. Ka3 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:43] } 39... Rc4 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:09] } 40. Nb5 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:37] } 40... h5 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:04] } 41. Nd6 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:34] } 41... Rxh4 { [%eval -67.33] [%clk 0:02:01] } 42. Nxb7 { [%eval #-4] [%clk 0:01:32] } 42... Rc3+ { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:58] } 43. Kb2 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:28] } 43... Rb3+ { [%eval #-4] [%clk 0:01:57] } 44. Ka2 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:24] } 44... Rh2+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:55] } 45. Ka1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:18] } 45... Ra3+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:54] } 46. Kb1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:09] } 46... Rb3+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:53] } 47. Kc1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:06] } 47... a3 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:51] } 48. Nc5 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:00:59] } 48... Rc3+ { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:49] } 49. Kd1 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:00:55] } 49... a2 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:47] } 50. b7 { [%eval #-1] [%clk 0:00:53] } 50... a1=Q# { [%clk 0:01:45] } 0-1
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Please find another game in which end game been made bit convoluted.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2017.11.11"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "dillondownes"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [WhiteElo "936"]
  [BlackElo "884"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [EndTime "13:53:47 PST"]
  [Termination "bram-stokers won by checkmate"]
  [CurrentPosition "R1kr4/1pp1r2p/6p1/1P2N1P1/1b2P2P/1P2B3/4K3/8 b - - 3 27"]
  
  1.b4 {[%clk 0:09:52]} d5 {[%clk 0:09:55]} 2.h4 {[%clk 0:09:40]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:09:52]} 3.f3 {[%clk 0:09:36]} Nc6 {[%clk 0:09:49]} 4.a3 {[%clk 0:09:28]} e6 {[%clk 0:09:47]} 5.d4 {[%clk 0:09:23]} g6 {[%clk 0:09:39]} 6.Nc3 {[%clk 0:09:20]} Bg7 {[%clk 0:09:37]} 7.g4 {[%clk 0:09:10]} e5 {[%clk 0:09:29]} 8.g5 {[%clk 0:09:04]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:09:25]} 9.dxe5 {[%clk 0:08:56]} Ndxe5 {[%clk 0:09:16]} 10.Rb1 {[%clk 0:08:38]} d4 {[%clk 0:08:59]} 11.Ne4 {[%clk 0:08:31]} Bf5 {[%clk 0:08:53]} 12.e3 {[%clk 0:08:14]} Bxe4 {[%clk 0:08:46]} 13.fxe4 {[%clk 0:08:11]} dxe3 {[%clk 0:08:43]} 14.Bxe3 {[%clk 0:08:08]} Qxd1+ {[%clk 0:08:37]} 15.Kxd1 {[%clk 0:08:06]} Nc4 {[%clk 0:08:25]} 16.Rb3 {[%clk 0:07:53]} Nd4 {[%clk 0:08:03]} 17.Bxc4 {[%clk 0:07:46]} Nxb3 {[%clk 0:08:00]} 18.cxb3 {[%clk 0:07:41]} O-O-O+ {[%clk 0:07:45]} 19.Ke2 {[%clk 0:07:35]} Bb2 {[%clk 0:07:33]} 20.a4 {[%clk 0:07:28]} a6 {[%clk 0:07:23]} 21.Bxf7 {[%clk 0:07:22]} Ba3 {[%clk 0:07:17]} 22.b5 {[%clk 0:07:14]} axb5 {[%clk 0:07:14]} 23.axb5 {[%clk 0:07:09]} Bb4 {[%clk 0:07:11]} 24.Nf3 {[%clk 0:07:06]} Rhf8 {[%clk 0:07:07]} 25.Ra1 {[%clk 0:06:59]} Rxf7 {[%clk 0:07:02]} 26.Ne5 {[%clk 0:06:55]} Re7 {[%clk 0:06:35]} 27.Ra8# {[%clk 0:06:51]}  1-0
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-12-01T23:48:03.563Z
Answers.Text: You make good points, but your explanations are rather confusing. Could you please expand them and add more games to support your answer?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Pablo S. Ocal
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-05-19T18:29:16.993Z
Answers.Text: I think my answer is not precise, however I've added few games, that belongs to - _Polish Opening_ that I had played.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-12-01T19:18:06.913Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-05-10T05:00:14.433Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2018-05-10T05:00:14.433Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dev Anand Sadasivam
Answers.Body: <p>a good line for black is 1b4 c6 2Bb2 Qb6 3a3 a5 4c3 and from their it should be better for black. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-09-30T22:24:22.000Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-09-30T22:24:22.000Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: GuRoux _
Answers.Body: <p>Could you be more precise please? Give us some lines in which you have difficulties. Polish defense is rather bad opening, imho can work only as some kind of surprise weapon against not too experienced players.</p>
  <p>Until you are more precise with exact variations my advice is super-simple and general:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>maintain strong center with <code>e4</code> and <code>d4</code>. <code>f3</code> is usually good since in polish defense there's a Bishop on b7</li>
  <li>develop your pieces to active squares</li>
  <li>Be careful with <code>Nc3</code> since it might be met with <code>b4</code> in some variations (I don't say it's bad move, just be careful)</li>
  </ul>
  <h1>edit</h1>
  <p>I just noticed I made a mistake with opening names.</p>
  <p>Well, <code>1. b4</code> is not a bad move. It's kind of English (<code>1. c4</code>) in many cases. You can't exploit it and get adventage. White color is white color. One tricky variation I 'fell into' is:
  <code>1. b4 - d5 2. Bb2 - c6 3. e3 - a5 4. a3 - Qb6 5. c4</code>. At first I thought I busted oponent, but it's nothing. About equals there.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-09-29T18:01:27.800Z
Answers.Text: I am referring to the white opening, 1 b4. What are good responses for black.
Answers.UserDisplayName: CognisMantis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-09-29T17:58:30.327Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-09-29T18:06:48.843Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-06-17T09:59:59.497Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Pijotrek
Body: <p><code>1. b4</code> It seems like that black can some how equalize. Despite this, I somehow get tricked and lose my games against this opening. </p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-09-29T19:55:25.230Z
Comments.Text: Accept the gambit and be prepared for a wild ride! If you understand basic chess strategy, it should be pretty easy to force a majority in the center in the process, thereby pretty much winning the game. I refer to openings like the polish as "flanking" openings, that is openings where the center is indirectly attacked via mechanisms such as the fianchetto. They tend to be good openings, but comparatively slow.
Comments.UserDisplayName: ldog
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-09-30T09:42:34.207Z
Comments.Text: Imagine, sometimes I _am white_ and I get tricked and lose my game! It's almost as if the opening doesn't decide the entire game.
Comments.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-02-01T23:30:18.523Z
Comments.Text: @Evargalo I have always believed 1.d4 b5 to be the Polish *Defense*, and 1.b4 the Polish (or Sokolsky) *Opening*.
Comments.UserDisplayName: bof
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2017-11-26T12:10:50.257Z
Comments.Text: I have always believed 1.d4 b5 to be the Polish Opening, and 1.b4 to be the Orang-outan (baptised such by Tartacover)
Comments.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Tags: <opening>
Title: How to play against the Polish opening?
ThreadText: # How to play against the Polish opening?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2014-09-29)
  
  `1. b4` It seems like that black can some how equalize. Despite this, I somehow get tricked and lose my games against this opening.
  
  **Tags:** opening
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Accept the gambit and be prepared for a wild ride! If you understand basic chess strategy, it should be pretty easy to force a majority in the center in the process, thereby pretty much winning the game. I refer to openings like the polish as "flanking" openings, that is openings where the center is indirectly attacked via mechanisms such as the fianchetto. They tend to be good openings, but comparatively slow.  
  > **username_2**: Imagine, sometimes I _am white_ and I get tricked and lose my game! It's almost as if the opening doesn't decide the entire game.  
  > **username_4**: I have always believed 1.d4 b5 to be the Polish Opening, and 1.b4 to be the Orang-outan (baptised such by Tartacover)  
  > **username_3**: @username_4 I have always believed 1.d4 b5 to be the Polish *Defense*, and 1.b4 the Polish (or Sokolsky) *Opening*.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 7 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2014-09-29. Score: 15
  
  I have played against this opening a lot, sometimes in bullet sometimes in blitz games, and even in casual ones without the clock. some of the opponents were strong candidate masters and sometimes a FIDE master would use it. 
  The easiest defense for me is 1...e5 and on 2.Bb2 to simply take on b4. This has several benefits:
  
  White is behind in development ( plays twice with the bishop );
  Black hinders White's fight for the center by keeping bishop on a5-e1 diagonal. This is very effective method that simply squelches any initiative White has. He may be equal in the resulting tabya but that is all he gets, and frankly, I believe Black has an easier game;
  Black gets half-open e-file which is very useful, since he will play ...d5 and ...Re8 at some point, so he can count on ...d4 push to generate initiative;
  Being behind in development and restrained in center, White can't really use b-file;
  Since Black has development advantage, the opening of the game benefits him ( ...d4 push mentioned above is useful for this );
  All of the Black pieces can acquire best squares ( knights on c6 and f6, bishops on b4 and g4 );
  Black has no pawn weaknesses, nor weak pieces, while White has weak pawn at a2;
  
  That is why I would advise you the above approach when battling the Sokolsky attack ( known also as Polish opening or Orangutan ). I have looked into Fritz opening database and found the lines I think give good game for Black in the easiest way ( I have added multiple hoices for Black so you can have a wider choice ). I am going to present them in the below diagram and will explain typical positions and plans afterwards.
  [Title "Recommended theory for Sokolsky attack"]
  [fen "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
  
  1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 ( 2.a3 d5 3.Bb2 ( 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bb2 Bd6 5.Nf3 ( 5.c4 c6 6.Nf3 Qe7 7.Nc3 a6 ) 5...Qe7 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) 3...Bd6 4.e3 ( 4.Nf3 Qe7 5.e3 Nf6 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) ( 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4 ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 ) 4...Nf6 5.Nf3 ( 5.c4 c6 6.Nf3 Qe7 7.Nc3 a6 ) 5...Qe7 6.c4 c6 7.Nc3 a6 ) ( 2.b5 d5 3.Bb2 Bd6 4.e3 ( 4.Nf3 Qe7 ) ( 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4 ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 ) 4...Nf6 ) 2...Bxb4 3.Bxe5 Nf6 4.c4 ( 4.c3 Be7 ) ( 4.Nf3 O-O 5.e3 d5 ) 4...O-O 5.Nf3 ( 5.e3 d5 6.cxd5 ( 6.Nf3 c5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Be2 Nc6 9.Bb2 Bf5 ) ( 6.Qb3 c5 7.a3 Ba5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Bc4 Nb6 10.Be2 Nc6 11.Bb2 Be6 ) ( 6.a3 Ba5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 ) 6...Nxd5 7.Nf3 Re8 ( 7...Be7 8.a3 c5 9.Be2 Nc6 10.Bb2 b6 11.O-O Bb7 ) 8.Bb2 ( 8.Be2 Rxe5 9.Nxe5 Qf6 10.f4 Nxe3 11.Qb3 Nxg2+ 12.Kd1 Nxf4 13.Nxf7 Qxf7 14.Bc4 Be6 15.Bxe6 Nxe6 ) 8...Be7 ) 5...Nc6 6. Bb2 d5 7. cxd5 Nxd5 
  
  OK, now you have thorough coverage of your repertoire with Black. I have tried to keep the number of lines to minimum, but all relevant White replies had to be covered. It is time to explain the ideas and plans in each separate position for Black:
  [Title "White takes pawn at e5, Black takes pawn on b4"]
  [fen "r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/3n4/1b6/5N2/PB1PPPPP/RN1QKB1R w KQ - 0 8"]
  
  In the above position Black has no weak pieces, he is not cramped and has development advantage. White on the other hand does have central pawn majority but he can't utilize it to gain initiative. The best he can do is e3 so he can safely finish development. Notice the tremendous pressure Bb4+ Nd5 exert on the White position by pressuring the dark squares ( c3 and the entire a5-e1 diagonal! ). This is the key idea of Black's defense in this, and similar positions -> to control a5-e1 diagonal and the dark squares. Black is more than fine here and simply playing natural moves should give you satisfactory position. It is White who fights for equality here.
  [Title "Tremendous exchange sacrifice for Black"]
  [fen "rn4k1/ppp2qpp/4n3/8/1b6/1Q6/P2P3P/RN1K3R w - - 0 16"]
  
  This is one of the variations from the above diagram that is most complex but is easy to play with Black. Black has sacrificed the rook for a knight, bishop, two pawns and exposed White king. The compensation is more than enough and Black has a winning position in my opinion. Just develop Nb8 and do not be afraid of d4, threatening to fork the knights with d5, because you have ...Rd8! which pins the pawn and gives decisive initiative. White can't survive because of his exposed king and lag in development. Again, you are fine.
  [Title "White plays the weak f4 attack"]
  [fen ""]
  
  1.b4 e5 2.a3 d5 3.Bb2 Bd6 4.f4 exf4 5.Bxg7 Qh4+ 6.g3 fxg3 7.Bg2 gxh2+ 8.Kf1 Nf6 9.Nf3 ( 9.Bxh8 Ne4 10.Bxe4 dxe4-+ ) 9...Qg3 10.Bxf6 ( 10.Bxh8 Bh3-+ 11.Rxh2 $8 Ng4 ) 10...Rg8 11.Rxh2 Qg6 12.Be5 Bxe5 13.Nxe5 Qf6+ 14.Kg1 Qxe5 
  
  The whole point of f4 lines is to accept the pawn, gambit the rook on h8 and smash White in the coming attack. These lines can be tricky so you could additionally analyze them with an engine, just to see how exactly can you capitalize on your advantage the easiest. Again, nothing to worry here, Black has a winning attack.
  [Title "White doesn't take the Black's pawn at e5"]
  [fen "rnb1k2r/1p2qppp/p1pb1n2/3pp3/1PP5/P1N1PN2/1B1P1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 0 14"]
  
  Here, White is smart and doesn't wish to make early trouble. He will finish development first, and then will try to capitalize on his queenside space advantage. The most typical plan in similar pawn structures is minority attack. That is why Black played ...a6 at some point, to hinder this plan. 
  Black will maintain his advantage in center, and will refute any type of wing play White bases. Remember the golden rules:
  
  Attack in the center refutes the wing attack;
  Who controls the center, controls the wings too;
  
  I would recommend you to study Orthodox defense of the QGD, and the Exchange variation of the QGD as positional transformations of the above position will have very similar plans like in the mentioned lines. M.Sadler-Queen's Gambit Declined ( 2000 ) is dated but excellent starting point. The book is clearly written and explains all the plans that might crop up here. You might need to learn about Isolated Queen's Pawn, and my answer to this question might be helpful as a starting point. For further reading I highly recommend A.Soltis-Pawn Structure Chess ( 1995 ) as it is simply awesome.
  If you have further questions leave me a comment. Hopefully this helps.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_6**: I think that White is fine in your second diagram. Basically he is playing a Sicilian with a move in hand. He will play e3, Be2, and 0-0. Where then is Black's pressure, or his central play? Actually, in this line, I would want to hold back with ..Nc6 until I had played ..c5.  
  > **username_3**: "Black has ***sacrificed*** the rook for a knight, bishop, two pawns . . ." Interesting use of the word "sacrifice". Kind of like sacrificing a rook for a queen.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2017-11-27. Score: 4
  
  1.b4 is also known as the Sokolsky opening,and Sokolsky wrote a good book on it. It used to be thought that ..e5,2.Bb2 Bxb4 was the line that Black should NOT play, because it gave up the center. I used to play 1.b4 then, and got good results. I stopped (except for occasional outings) when it became generally known that ..e5 etc was a good line. Maybe you should play that, but it isn't quite as easy as people are saying. You have given up the center for piece activity, and you need to make energetic use of those pieces. If that does not appeal, then try a reversed Kings Indian Attack. (..e5,d6,Nf6,g6,Bg7)
  
  The 1..c6 line is very interesting, but nothing for White to be afraid of after 2.c4!, eg 2..Qb6 3.Qb3!
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2017-11-26. Score: 1
  
  I usually answer 1... c6 which is a pretty good option if White continues with 2.Bb2. then game might continue with 2... a5 3.a3 axb4 4.axb4 Rxa1 5.Rxa1 Qb6 and now White has to make a choice how to defend the b4-pawn. I think that his best option is to give this pawn immediately with something like b5 or e3.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2017-11-28. Score: 1
  
  In the 1.b4 e5 line, Stockfish reaches some 30-40 centipawns advantage for black, so this could hardly be an opening to recommend, bearing in mind that
  it is **white** who should have the edge in the opening.
  If you want a quiet refutation, then just play 1...g6 and then fianchetto your king side bishop.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_9 on 2017-12-01. Score: 1
  
  While I play Polish Opening, the same had happened to me as well, 
  
  I somehow get tricked and lose my games against this opening.
  
  I don't know why most of them in chess.com opens either King's pawn or Queen's pawn always.
  But here my opponent was more cautious maybe that made me pity, however I won the game as he lost his time.
  
  To say, its look like fair most good variation considering Polish Defense,- "Polish Opening Outflank Variation"
  
  Here is the game fen for look upon, so you could see one way of developing principle for Polish Opening Outflank Variation,- 1.b4 c6
  [FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2017.12.02"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "KocouJo"]
  [WhiteElo "954"]
  [BlackElo "920"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [Termination "game_result.won_on_time"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [CurrentPosition "3B1b1r/1Q2pk1p/p4p2/1p4p1/4P2q/5KR1/P1r5/8 b - - 7 37"]
  
  1.b4 c6 2.g4 d5 3.e3 g5 4.Bb2 f6 5.Nf3 Bxg4 6.Rg1 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 Qd6 8.c3 Qxh2 9.Rg2 Qh1 10.Qg4 Nd7 11.d3 Nh6 12.Qg3 Ne5 13.Ke2 Qh5+ 14.Kd2 Nf3+ 15.Kc1 Nf5 16.Qc7 Nd6 17.Nd2 Rc8 18.Qa5 Nb5 19.Rg3 Nxd2 20.Kxd2 a6 21.Qb6 Rc7 22.c4 dxc4 23.dxc4 Qh4 24.cxb5 Qxb4+ 25.Bc3 Qd6+ 26.Ke2 cxb5 27.Ba5 Rc2+ 28.Kf3 Qd5+ 29.e4 Qe5 (30.Rd1) 30.Qxb7 Qxa1 31.Qb8+ Kf7 32.Bd8 Qxf1 33.Qb7 Qxf2+ 34.Kg4 Qe2+ 35.Kh3 Qh2+ 36.Kg4 Qh4+ 37.Kf3  1-0
  
  Here is another Game, at the end of game due to Time Constraint and some complexity opponent got detracted a bit.
  [FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2018.02.01"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "Jed_NZ"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [WhiteElo "973"]
  [BlackElo "986"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [EndTime "4:13:25 PST"]
  [Termination "bram-stokers won on time"]
  [CurrentPosition "8/3R2kp/3PQ1p1/1p3p2/4pP1P/8/7P/1K6 b - - 0 38"]
  
  1.b4 {[%clk 0:09:47]} e5 {[%clk 0:09:57]} 2.c3 {[%clk 0:09:39]} d5 {[%clk 0:09:53]} 3.d4 {[%clk 0:09:19]} e4 {[%clk 0:09:43]} 4.e3 {[%clk 0:09:13]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:09:37]} 5.Na3 {[%clk 0:09:05]} Bg4 {[%clk 0:09:34]} 6.Qb3 {[%clk 0:08:56]} a6 {[%clk 0:09:26]} 7.Nh3 {[%clk 0:08:41]} Bxh3 {[%clk 0:09:21]} 8.gxh3 {[%clk 0:08:36]} a5 {[%clk 0:08:53]} 9.Bd2 {[%clk 0:08:27]} axb4 {[%clk 0:08:44]} 10.cxb4 {[%clk 0:08:23]} Nc6 {[%clk 0:08:33]} 11.b5 {[%clk 0:08:17]} Nxd4 {[%clk 0:08:20]} 12.exd4 {[%clk 0:08:10]} Bxa3 {[%clk 0:08:01]} 13.Bb4 {[%clk 0:07:56]} Bxb4+ {[%clk 0:07:44]} 14.Qxb4 {[%clk 0:07:54]} b6 {[%clk 0:07:32]} 15.a4 {[%clk 0:07:44]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:06:52]} 16.O-O-O {[%clk 0:07:35]} Nb8 {[%clk 0:06:34]} 17.Be2 {[%clk 0:07:29]} c6 {[%clk 0:06:29]} 18.Rhg1 {[%clk 0:07:16]} g6 {[%clk 0:06:05]} 19.Rg5 {[%clk 0:07:04]} Qc7 {[%clk 0:05:52]} 20.Re5+ {[%clk 0:06:58]} Kd8 {[%clk 0:05:45]} 21.Bg4 {[%clk 0:06:48]} cxb5+ {[%clk 0:05:41]} 22.Kb1 {[%clk 0:06:33]} Rxa4 {[%clk 0:05:15]} 23.Rxd5+ {[%clk 0:06:29]} Ke8 {[%clk 0:04:57]} 24.Qxb5+ {[%clk 0:06:26]} Qc6 {[%clk 0:04:30]} 25.Bd7+ {[%clk 0:05:53]} Qxd7 {[%clk 0:03:13]} 26.Rxd7 {[%clk 0:05:46]} Nxd7 {[%clk 0:02:44]} 27.Qxa4 {[%clk 0:05:42]} Ke7 {[%clk 0:02:35]} 28.Re1 {[%clk 0:05:36]} f5 {[%clk 0:02:29]} 29.Qb4+ {[%clk 0:05:30]} Kf7 {[%clk 0:02:20]} 30.d5 {[%clk 0:05:22]} Ra8 {[%clk 0:01:43]} 31.f4 {[%clk 0:05:14]} Ra6 {[%clk 0:01:29]} 32.Qd6 {[%clk 0:05:07]} Ra7 {[%clk 0:00:47]} 33.Qe6+ {[%clk 0:05:00]} Kg7 {[%clk 0:00:45]} 34.d6 {[%clk 0:04:57]} b5 {[%clk 0:00:35]} 35.Rc1 {[%clk 0:04:52]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:00:06]} 36.h4 {[%clk 0:04:34]} Rc7 {[%clk 0:00:02]} 37.Rxc7+ {[%clk 0:04:27]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:00:00]} 38.Rxd7+ {[%clk 0:04:24]}  1-0
  
  Here is one another Blitz Game of 5 minutes time control per side, in which more inaccuracies or blunders can be denoted.
  [FEN ""]
  [Event "Rated Blitz game"]
  [Site "https://lichess.org/IkU6jNFS"]
  [Date "2018.02.18"]
  [Round "-"]
  [White "BramStokers"]
  [Black "timjim77"]
  [Result "0-1"]
  [UTCDate "2018.02.18"]
  [UTCTime "00:34:55"]
  [WhiteElo "1500"]
  [BlackElo "1470"]
  [WhiteRatingDiff "-191"]
  [BlackRatingDiff "+8"]
  [Variant "Standard"]
  [TimeControl "300+0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [Opening "Polish Opening"]
  [Termination "Normal"]
  
  1. b4 { [%eval -0.09] [%clk 0:05:00] } 1... e5 { [%eval -0.09] [%clk 0:05:00] } 2. c3 { [%eval -0.7] [%clk 0:04:56] } 2... d5 { [%eval -0.7] [%clk 0:04:57] } 3. Na3 { [%eval -1.41] [%clk 0:04:49] } 3... Nf6 { [%eval -1.41] [%clk 0:04:52] } 4. e3 { [%eval -1.37] [%clk 0:04:43] } 4... Bd6 { [%eval -1.4] [%clk 0:04:49] } 5. g4 { [%eval -3.09] [%clk 0:04:41] } 5... Bxg4 { [%eval -3.07] [%clk 0:04:45] } 6. f3 { [%eval -3.37] [%clk 0:04:35] } 6... Bh5 { [%eval -3.39] [%clk 0:04:42] } 7. Qe2 { [%eval -3.87] [%clk 0:04:28] } 7... e4 { [%eval -2.82] [%clk 0:04:40] } 8. Bb2 { [%eval -3.5] [%clk 0:04:20] } 8... exf3 { [%eval -2.32] [%clk 0:04:38] } 9. Nxf3 { [%eval -2.57] [%clk 0:04:18] } 9... O-O { [%eval -2.28] [%clk 0:04:32] } 10. O-O-O { [%eval -2.84] [%clk 0:04:16] } 10... Re8 { [%eval -2.64] [%clk 0:04:28] } 11. Bh3 { [%eval -3.2] [%clk 0:04:10] } 11... Nbd7 { [%eval -3.24] [%clk 0:04:16] } 12. Rhg1 { [%eval -3.0] [%clk 0:04:07] } 12... Ne5 { [%eval -2.81] [%clk 0:04:14] } 13. Qg2 { [%eval -3.26] [%clk 0:03:56] } 13... Ng6 { [%eval -1.85] [%clk 0:04:02] } 14. Nh4 { [%eval -4.31] [%clk 0:03:47] } 14... Ne4 { [%eval -2.77] [%clk 0:03:45] } 15. Rdf1 { [%eval -6.09] [%clk 0:03:38] } 15... Qxh4 { [%eval -5.67] [%clk 0:03:43] } 16. Rf4 { [%eval -11.49] [%clk 0:03:21] } 16... Bxf4 { [%eval -11.0] [%clk 0:03:31] } 17. exf4 { [%eval -12.4] [%clk 0:03:18] } 17... Qxf4 { [%eval -10.77] [%clk 0:03:25] } 18. Rf1 { [%eval -10.67] [%clk 0:03:10] } 18... Qxd2+ { [%eval -7.6] [%clk 0:03:08] } 19. Kb1 { [%eval -16.45] [%clk 0:03:05] } 19... Qxg2 { [%eval -16.38] [%clk 0:03:02] } 20. Bxg2 { [%eval -16.16] [%clk 0:03:01] } 20... Nd2+ { [%eval -15.89] [%clk 0:02:59] } 21. Kc2 { [%eval -15.88] [%clk 0:02:56] } 21... Nxf1 { [%eval -15.4] [%clk 0:02:59] } 22. Bxf1 { [%eval -15.32] [%clk 0:02:55] } 22... Ne5 { [%eval -11.32] [%clk 0:02:55] } 23. Kd2 { [%eval -16.17] [%clk 0:02:52] } 23... Nc4+ { [%eval -14.29] [%clk 0:02:54] } 24. Kc1 { [%eval -58.6] [%clk 0:02:46] } 24... Nxb2 { [%eval -13.51] [%clk 0:02:52] } 25. Kxb2 { [%eval -13.0] [%clk 0:02:45] } 25... a5 { [%eval -12.11] [%clk 0:02:48] } 26. b5 { [%eval -13.37] [%clk 0:02:43] } 26... a4 { [%eval -11.95] [%clk 0:02:46] } 27. h4 { [%eval -15.41] [%clk 0:02:36] } 27... Re1 { [%eval -15.39] [%clk 0:02:43] } 28. Bd3 { [%eval -14.78] [%clk 0:02:30] } 28... Bg6 { [%eval -13.52] [%clk 0:02:41] } 29. Bc2 { [%eval -15.4] [%clk 0:02:25] } 29... Re2 { [%eval -13.7] [%clk 0:02:39] } 30. Kc1 { [%eval -24.76] [%clk 0:02:04] } 30... Bxc2 { [%eval -16.9] [%clk 0:02:36] } 31. Nxc2 { [%eval -15.13] [%clk 0:02:02] } 31... c5 { [%eval -13.62] [%clk 0:02:30] } 32. b6 { [%eval #-13] [%clk 0:01:59] } 32... d4 { [%eval #-13] [%clk 0:02:27] } 33. cxd4 { [%eval #-14] [%clk 0:01:57] } 33... cxd4 { [%eval -59.7] [%clk 0:02:27] } 34. Nxd4 { [%eval #-9] [%clk 0:01:55] } 34... Rxa2 { [%eval #-11] [%clk 0:02:26] } 35. Nb5 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:53] } 35... Rc8+ { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:02:21] } 36. Kb1 { [%eval #-5] [%clk 0:01:49] } 36... Rac2 { [%eval #-15] [%clk 0:02:17] } 37. Na7 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:46] } 37... Rc1+ { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:14] } 38. Kb2 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:44] } 38... R8c2+ { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:02:12] } 39. Ka3 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:43] } 39... Rc4 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:09] } 40. Nb5 { [%eval #-6] [%clk 0:01:37] } 40... h5 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:02:04] } 41. Nd6 { [%eval #-7] [%clk 0:01:34] } 41... Rxh4 { [%eval -67.33] [%clk 0:02:01] } 42. Nxb7 { [%eval #-4] [%clk 0:01:32] } 42... Rc3+ { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:58] } 43. Kb2 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:28] } 43... Rb3+ { [%eval #-4] [%clk 0:01:57] } 44. Ka2 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:24] } 44... Rh2+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:55] } 45. Ka1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:18] } 45... Ra3+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:54] } 46. Kb1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:09] } 46... Rb3+ { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:53] } 47. Kc1 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:06] } 47... a3 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:51] } 48. Nc5 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:00:59] } 48... Rc3+ { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:01:49] } 49. Kd1 { [%eval #-3] [%clk 0:00:55] } 49... a2 { [%eval #-2] [%clk 0:01:47] } 50. b7 { [%eval #-1] [%clk 0:00:53] } 50... a1=Q# { [%clk 0:01:45] } 0-1
  
  Please find another game in which end game been made bit convoluted.
  [FEN ""]
  [Event "Live Chess"]
  [Site "Chess.com"]
  [Date "2017.11.11"]
  [White "bram-stokers"]
  [Black "dillondownes"]
  [Result "1-0"]
  [ECO "A00"]
  [WhiteElo "936"]
  [BlackElo "884"]
  [TimeControl "600"]
  [EndTime "13:53:47 PST"]
  [Termination "bram-stokers won by checkmate"]
  [CurrentPosition "R1kr4/1pp1r2p/6p1/1P2N1P1/1b2P2P/1P2B3/4K3/8 b - - 3 27"]
  
  1.b4 {[%clk 0:09:52]} d5 {[%clk 0:09:55]} 2.h4 {[%clk 0:09:40]} Nf6 {[%clk 0:09:52]} 3.f3 {[%clk 0:09:36]} Nc6 {[%clk 0:09:49]} 4.a3 {[%clk 0:09:28]} e6 {[%clk 0:09:47]} 5.d4 {[%clk 0:09:23]} g6 {[%clk 0:09:39]} 6.Nc3 {[%clk 0:09:20]} Bg7 {[%clk 0:09:37]} 7.g4 {[%clk 0:09:10]} e5 {[%clk 0:09:29]} 8.g5 {[%clk 0:09:04]} Nd7 {[%clk 0:09:25]} 9.dxe5 {[%clk 0:08:56]} Ndxe5 {[%clk 0:09:16]} 10.Rb1 {[%clk 0:08:38]} d4 {[%clk 0:08:59]} 11.Ne4 {[%clk 0:08:31]} Bf5 {[%clk 0:08:53]} 12.e3 {[%clk 0:08:14]} Bxe4 {[%clk 0:08:46]} 13.fxe4 {[%clk 0:08:11]} dxe3 {[%clk 0:08:43]} 14.Bxe3 {[%clk 0:08:08]} Qxd1+ {[%clk 0:08:37]} 15.Kxd1 {[%clk 0:08:06]} Nc4 {[%clk 0:08:25]} 16.Rb3 {[%clk 0:07:53]} Nd4 {[%clk 0:08:03]} 17.Bxc4 {[%clk 0:07:46]} Nxb3 {[%clk 0:08:00]} 18.cxb3 {[%clk 0:07:41]} O-O-O+ {[%clk 0:07:45]} 19.Ke2 {[%clk 0:07:35]} Bb2 {[%clk 0:07:33]} 20.a4 {[%clk 0:07:28]} a6 {[%clk 0:07:23]} 21.Bxf7 {[%clk 0:07:22]} Ba3 {[%clk 0:07:17]} 22.b5 {[%clk 0:07:14]} axb5 {[%clk 0:07:14]} 23.axb5 {[%clk 0:07:09]} Bb4 {[%clk 0:07:11]} 24.Nf3 {[%clk 0:07:06]} Rhf8 {[%clk 0:07:07]} 25.Ra1 {[%clk 0:06:59]} Rxf7 {[%clk 0:07:02]} 26.Ne5 {[%clk 0:06:55]} Re7 {[%clk 0:06:35]} 27.Ra8# {[%clk 0:06:51]}  1-0
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_10**: You make good points, but your explanations are rather confusing. Could you please expand them and add more games to support your answer?  
  > **username_9**: I think my answer is not precise, however I've added few games, that belongs to - _Polish Opening_ that I had played.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_11 on 2014-09-30. Score: 1
  
  a good line for black is 1b4 c6 2Bb2 Qb6 3a3 a5 4c3 and from their it should be better for black.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_12 on 2014-09-29. Score: 0
  
  Could you be more precise please? Give us some lines in which you have difficulties. Polish defense is rather bad opening, imho can work only as some kind of surprise weapon against not too experienced players.
  
  Until you are more precise with exact variations my advice is super-simple and general:
  
  * maintain strong center with `e4` and `d4`. `f3` is usually good since in polish defense there's a Bishop on b7
  * develop your pieces to active squares
  * Be careful with `Nc3` since it might be met with `b4` in some variations (I don't say it's bad move, just be careful)
  
  # edit
  
  I just noticed I made a mistake with opening names.
  
  Well, `1. b4` is not a bad move. It's kind of English (`1. c4`) in many cases. You can't exploit it and get adventage. White color is white color. One tricky variation I 'fell into' is:
  `1. b4 - d5 2. Bb2 - c6 3. e3 - a5 4. a3 - Qb6 5. c4`. At first I thought I busted oponent, but it's nothing. About equals there.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: I am referring to the white opening, 1 b4. What are good responses for black.  
  
  ---
  
  