Answers.Body: <p>I looked at my library, and opened up a number of books. The old Dvoretsky books really do not do this much, but the "School of Future Champions" and "School of Chess Excellence" series do have many sections that just say "white (or black) to play", and nothing more.</p>
  
  <p>Other Dvoretsky books that do that significantly are "Recognizing Your Opponent's Resources", which has 154 such examples. Also, "Chess Lessons" and "Maneuvering: The Art of Piece Play". That said, all of Dvoretsky's books are quite advanced, and you need to be above 2000 OTB, preferably 2200, to really benefit. His last book, "Chess Tests", was nothing but positions.</p>
  
  <p>A couple of other tough books, but not as tough as Dvoretsky, are the classic "The Best Move" by Hort and Jansa, and "Test Your Chess Skills" by Sarhan Guliev and Logman Guliev. Again, both are a bit advanced, but still OK for a wider range of players.</p>
  
  <p>My recommendation for most players are two outstanding series of books. The Yusupov series "Build up/Boost/Chess Evolution". There are 10 books in the series, and in each one, there is a lesson, and then a series of 12 test exercises for each lesson with just who is to move. The first four books are not simple, but they are accessible to players of a very wide range of OTB ratings. They get harder after that. This series is like having your own former top-10 GM as your teacher.</p>
  
  <p>The other is the Jacob Aagaard series "Grandmaster preparation". There are 6 in this series, and there are many problems within each book. One of these books is even called "Grandmaster Preparation - Calculation".</p>
  
  <p>Start with the first four Yusupov books, and go from there, is my recommendation.</p>
  
  <p>P.S. The Yusupov books cover everything, from opening to tactics, to endgames, to positional play, as you specifically asked about.</p>
  
  <p>P.P.S. NoseKnowsAll mentioned Silman below, and Silman posts a lot of articles he writes on chess.com. While not all are position-related, he does a lot about pawn structures, and other positions. You can find them <a href="https://www.chess.com/member/silman" rel="noreferrer">here</a> (click "More" at the bottom to see more of his articles to find the ones you want).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-02T23:45:15.280Z
Answers.Text: I would add "Reassess your Chess" by Silman to this list. His book comes with a workbook with just over 100 of these positions for people to analyze and then come up with the positionally best move.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NoseKnowsAll
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T11:20:57.760Z
Answers.Text: @NoseKnowsAll Funny, I have the text but didn’t know about the workbook. I like Silman a lot so I’ll have a look at it, thanks!
Answers.UserDisplayName: 11684
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-02T23:19:31.403Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-03T01:47:23.307Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-01-03T01:47:23.307Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>I am currently working through <code>Karpov Move by Move</code>  One nice thing about this books is that it stops to ask a question sometimes.  Often the question is "how do you access this position"  and then goes on to discuss that answer.  And of course reviewing Karpovs games is helpful for anyone thinking about positional play.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T01:54:04.920Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-03T01:54:04.920Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Answers.Body: <p>There are some youtube videos that have problems to solve which are not purely tactical -- This channel is good : <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpUUMhWg5GPD5ynP_vhnMJg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpUUMhWg5GPD5ynP_vhnMJg</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-07-21T00:13:40.943Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-07-21T00:13:40.943Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Olsen
Answers.Body: <p>I have found Silman's Lessons in Strategy 1 and 2, available at <a href="https://www.chess.com/lessons/strategy" rel="nofollow noreferrer">chess.com</a> quite good. They do contain some "tactics" as well, but similar to as in a real game, you wouldn't know which positions have a tactical or a strategical solution. Besides, you might also be required to analyze whether the position resulting from the tactic will result in a strategic advantage.</p>
  
  <p>The other lessons on chess.com are probably also quite good, but I prefer Silman's, as they provide thorough analysis both of the wrong and the correct moves, contrary to many of the other lessons.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T18:23:45.060Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-03T18:23:45.060Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ojmik
Body: <p>In point 3 of <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/17019">this</a> answer RemcoGerlich implies that a good way to improve, for a class player, would be to develop the skill of “[taking] any position and [figuring] out what’s going on”.</p>
  
  <p>It seems to me this is the kind of observation that has been made quite often before. Is there any kind of resource that provides a collection of positions for this purpose? Preferably ordered by difficulty and with some annotations to check your own analysis against.</p>
  
  <p>Clearly, there are books about the middlegame but the ones that I know talk about various topics in isolation (providing positions which revolve solely around the topic of that chapter) and not about general analysis. (Not that I would like such a collection of positions to only include middlegame positions but this example comes the closest to what I have in mind.)</p>
  
  <p>I am also not looking for tactical puzzles. There are plenty of books and apps that provide them. In case of a tactical puzzle it’s very clear what’s going on in the position: there’s an immediately winning tactic. (Or sometimes a single drawing move. But mostly it’s clearly one or the other.)</p>
  
  <p>Annotated games could possibly be used for this, but it’s not trivial to select the positions that would be of interest for this without reading the annotations. Also, the strategical themes wouldn’t change so often during a single game so the amount of practice positions derived from an annotated game is quite low relative to the effort required to find them – clearly a selection by a renowned chess teacher would be far superior.</p>
  
  <p>Ideally, I’m looking for a collection of positions that are decidedly not tactical and that have various strategical themes in them so the reader may analyse and evaluate the position, afterwards checking with the provided annotations. They don’t need to have a clear best move, it would be enough to just try and find all important themes and get a good sense of which side is better.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T00:09:11.397Z
Comments.Text: Possibly related: https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/13447/3594
Comments.UserDisplayName: Ellie
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T10:55:31.657Z
Comments.Text: Not ordered by anything, and without any human annotations, but have you tried [Lichess Puzzles](https://lichess.org/training), which are all taken from actual games, and that you can review with Stockfish analysis?
Comments.UserDisplayName: user21820
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T11:06:13.453Z
Comments.Text: @user21820 Yes I do them every day. They are tactical puzzles, most of them with immediate mate or material gain. They are not about figuring out what’s going in the position since that is clear: there is an immediate winning tactic. I will make this point more clear in my question.
Comments.UserDisplayName: 11684
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T11:09:02.930Z
Comments.Text: Efstratios Grivas wrote a book with is basically a large quiz with middlegame positions
Comments.UserDisplayName: David
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T11:38:25.687Z
Comments.Text: Ah I see. Thanks for clarifying!
Comments.UserDisplayName: user21820
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T16:33:36.837Z
Comments.Text: Related: https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/17069/9025
Comments.UserDisplayName: Herb
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2020-01-03T16:55:05.450Z
Comments.Text: i learned from a book called Test Your Positional Play (pub 1985) that had exercises where you chose between alternative analyses of a position. seemed like a good intro to planning in chess.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Nathan Hughes
Tags: <analysis><learning><evaluation><study>
Title: Is there some resource of non-tactical positions to practice analysing?
ThreadText: # Is there some resource of non-tactical positions to practice analysing?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-01-02)
  
  In point 3 of [this](https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/17019) answer RemcoGerlich implies that a good way to improve, for a class player, would be to develop the skill of “[taking] any position and [figuring] out what’s going on”.
  
  It seems to me this is the kind of observation that has been made quite often before. Is there any kind of resource that provides a collection of positions for this purpose? Preferably ordered by difficulty and with some annotations to check your own analysis against.
  
  Clearly, there are books about the middlegame but the ones that I know talk about various topics in isolation (providing positions which revolve solely around the topic of that chapter) and not about general analysis. (Not that I would like such a collection of positions to only include middlegame positions but this example comes the closest to what I have in mind.)
  
  I am also not looking for tactical puzzles. There are plenty of books and apps that provide them. In case of a tactical puzzle it’s very clear what’s going on in the position: there’s an immediately winning tactic. (Or sometimes a single drawing move. But mostly it’s clearly one or the other.)
  
  Annotated games could possibly be used for this, but it’s not trivial to select the positions that would be of interest for this without reading the annotations. Also, the strategical themes wouldn’t change so often during a single game so the amount of practice positions derived from an annotated game is quite low relative to the effort required to find them – clearly a selection by a renowned chess teacher would be far superior.
  
  Ideally, I’m looking for a collection of positions that are decidedly not tactical and that have various strategical themes in them so the reader may analyse and evaluate the position, afterwards checking with the provided annotations. They don’t need to have a clear best move, it would be enough to just try and find all important themes and get a good sense of which side is better.
  
  **Tags:** analysis, learning, evaluation, study
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Possibly related: https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/13447/3594  
  > **username_2**: Not ordered by anything, and without any human annotations, but have you tried [Lichess Puzzles](https://lichess.org/training), which are all taken from actual games, and that you can review with Stockfish analysis?  
  > **username_0**: @username_2 Yes I do them every day. They are tactical puzzles, most of them with immediate mate or material gain. They are not about figuring out what’s going in the position since that is clear: there is an immediate winning tactic. I will make this point more clear in my question.  
  > **username_3**: Efstratios Grivas wrote a book with is basically a large quiz with middlegame positions  
  > **username_2**: Ah I see. Thanks for clarifying!  
  > **username_4**: Related: https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/17069/9025  
  > **username_5**: i learned from a book called Test Your Positional Play (pub 1985) that had exercises where you chose between alternative analyses of a position. seemed like a good intro to planning in chess.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2020-01-02. Score: 6
  
  I looked at my library, and opened up a number of books. The old Dvoretsky books really do not do this much, but the "School of Future Champions" and "School of Chess Excellence" series do have many sections that just say "white (or black) to play", and nothing more.
  
  Other Dvoretsky books that do that significantly are "Recognizing Your Opponent's Resources", which has 154 such examples. Also, "Chess Lessons" and "Maneuvering: The Art of Piece Play". That said, all of Dvoretsky's books are quite advanced, and you need to be above 2000 OTB, preferably 2200, to really benefit. His last book, "Chess Tests", was nothing but positions.
  
  A couple of other tough books, but not as tough as Dvoretsky, are the classic "The Best Move" by Hort and Jansa, and "Test Your Chess Skills" by Sarhan Guliev and Logman Guliev. Again, both are a bit advanced, but still OK for a wider range of players.
  
  My recommendation for most players are two outstanding series of books. The Yusupov series "Build up/Boost/Chess Evolution". There are 10 books in the series, and in each one, there is a lesson, and then a series of 12 test exercises for each lesson with just who is to move. The first four books are not simple, but they are accessible to players of a very wide range of OTB ratings. They get harder after that. This series is like having your own former top-10 GM as your teacher.
  
  The other is the Jacob Aagaard series "Grandmaster preparation". There are 6 in this series, and there are many problems within each book. One of these books is even called "Grandmaster Preparation - Calculation".
  
  Start with the first four Yusupov books, and go from there, is my recommendation.
  
  P.S. The Yusupov books cover everything, from opening to tactics, to endgames, to positional play, as you specifically asked about.
  
  P.P.S. username_7 mentioned Silman below, and Silman posts a lot of articles he writes on chess.com. While not all are position-related, he does a lot about pawn structures, and other positions. You can find them [here](https://www.chess.com/member/silman) (click "More" at the bottom to see more of his articles to find the ones you want).
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_7**: I would add "Reassess your Chess" by Silman to this list. His book comes with a workbook with just over 100 of these positions for people to analyze and then come up with the positionally best move.  
  > **username_0**: @username_7 Funny, I have the text but didn’t know about the workbook. I like Silman a lot so I’ll have a look at it, thanks!  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2020-01-03. Score: 4
  
  I am currently working through `Karpov Move by Move` One nice thing about this books is that it stops to ask a question sometimes. Often the question is "how do you access this position" and then goes on to discuss that answer. And of course reviewing Karpovs games is helpful for anyone thinking about positional play.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_9 on 2022-07-21. Score: 0
  
  There are some youtube videos that have problems to solve which are not purely tactical -- This channel is good : <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpUUMhWg5GPD5ynP_vhnMJg>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_10 on 2020-01-03. Score: 0
  
  I have found Silman's Lessons in Strategy 1 and 2, available at [chess.com](https://www.chess.com/lessons/strategy) quite good. They do contain some "tactics" as well, but similar to as in a real game, you wouldn't know which positions have a tactical or a strategical solution. Besides, you might also be required to analyze whether the position resulting from the tactic will result in a strategic advantage.
  
  The other lessons on chess.com are probably also quite good, but I prefer Silman's, as they provide thorough analysis both of the wrong and the correct moves, contrary to many of the other lessons.
  
  
  ---
  
  