Answers.Body: <p>The idea of Mr. Roman, I have see the video, is that the opening is somewhat blunt. But still he also gives clarifications that some lines are winning. The positions achieved will certainty not be the ones you achieve in most of your games. As another answerer mentioned, stick to the Grand Prix, or to another Anti-Sicilian, such as the Alapin.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-07-29T17:50:23.807Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-07-29T17:50:23.807Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: MikhailTal
Answers.Body: <p>The Dragon Opening is an Opening which should not be played below the 2000 ElO level for the Black Player . The main objective of Dragon for the Black is to sacrifice the c8 Rook for the c3 Knight which guards the White King when he does the long Castle . It is one of the most popular Exchange Sacrifice which Players at Master level and above do understand and can play it better. I am not saying that Players who are 1500 ~ Elo fails to understand . </p>
  
  <p>My Objective is if you understand the Counterattacking theme from black then you should go ahead to play the Dragon . Generally compared to other Sicilians White's attack comes very fast (Yugoslav Attack )because the pawn stands on g6 and Black has to be extra cautious because the h file gets opened very soon where White unites his Rooks on h-file and hover around Black's King . Black's game has to be ultra sharp to do the Counter attack . The Theory of Dragon even extends to 25-30 moves which the Black player should memorize in order to win the game . If he makes 2-3 incorrect moves he/she loses very soon .</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-02-22T08:12:51.447Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-06T16:10:33.510Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-03-06T16:10:33.510Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Seth Projnabrata
Answers.Body: <p>GM Gawain Jones (who plays this opening) just published a huge two volume work.  His conclusion, of course, is that it is quite playable.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-02-21T07:15:38.400Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-02-21T07:15:38.400Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ToddM
Answers.Body: <p>I played the Yugoslav attack when a IM played the Dragon against me, and in my chess area they do not know how to play the Dragon variations with me. It's quite solid with lots of tactical opportunities, however it's also dangerous for both sides so be careful when playing it.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-02-21T12:07:28.650Z
Answers.Text: This doesn't adress the question at all!
Answers.UserDisplayName: Scounged
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-01-22T14:35:27.153Z
Answers.Text: How can it be both solid and dangerous? In chess, they're near antonyms ...
Answers.UserDisplayName: Glorfindel
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-12-05T07:07:53.503Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-01-22T14:34:59.780Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-01-22T14:34:59.780Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Cferrel
Answers.Body: <p>No, it is not refuted, and it is not any more dubious than dozens of other mainstream openings. It's dangerous for both sides, of course. I would not worry about its theoretical status until your rating gets to 2600 or so.</p>
  
  <p>Note also that if you stop playing the Grand Prix, you're going to have to decide what to do against all the other Black Open Sicilian defense besides the Dragon.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-12-05T13:14:54.560Z
Answers.Text: I think 2600 is a tad too specific, any serious tournament master-level (FIDE 2200+) player who employs the Yugoslav attack should be well aware of the theoretical status of their opening
Answers.UserDisplayName: sco-ish
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-12-05T14:19:48.623Z
Answers.Text: @sco-ish Yes, I agree that anyone at 2200 should be aware of the theoretical status of their opening. What I meant that the theoretical status of the Dragon in particular is not in danger below the top levels.
Answers.UserDisplayName: dfan
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-21T15:39:51.507Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-01-21T15:39:51.507Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: dfan
Body: <p>I saw, some weeks ago, a <a href="http://shop.chess.co.uk/product-p/cb02984.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">video</a> of the great GM Roman Dzindzichashvili, claiming that Sicilian Dragon is somewhat refuted, or at least it is a dubious system. I normally play the Grand Prix against the Sicilian, but if what I saw on the video is true, I may switch to the Yugoslav attack. </p>
  
  <p>Basically my question is the dragon really a bad opening and is the Yugoslav attack the its "refutation" (strong word I know) ?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-01-21T04:56:29.750Z
Comments.Text: Magnus plays it and defeats super GMs.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Tags: <opening><sicilian-defense>
Title: Does the Yugoslav Attack refute the Sicilian Dragon?
ThreadText: # Does the Yugoslav Attack refute the Sicilian Dragon?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2014-01-20)
  
  I saw, some weeks ago, a [video](http://shop.chess.co.uk/product-p/cb02984.htm) of the great GM Roman Dzindzichashvili, claiming that Sicilian Dragon is somewhat refuted, or at least it is a dubious system. I normally play the Grand Prix against the Sicilian, but if what I saw on the video is true, I may switch to the Yugoslav attack.
  
  Basically my question is the dragon really a bad opening and is the Yugoslav attack the its "refutation" (strong word I know) ?
  
  **Tags:** opening, sicilian-defense
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Magnus plays it and defeats super GMs.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2014-01-21. Score: 9 | Accepted answer
  
  No, it is not refuted, and it is not any more dubious than dozens of other mainstream openings. It's dangerous for both sides, of course. I would not worry about its theoretical status until your rating gets to 2600 or so.
  
  Note also that if you stop playing the Grand Prix, you're going to have to decide what to do against all the other Black Open Sicilian defense besides the Dragon.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_9**: I think 2600 is a tad too specific, any serious tournament master-level (FIDE 2200+) player who employs the Yugoslav attack should be well aware of the theoretical status of their opening  
  > **username_8**: @username_9 Yes, I agree that anyone at 2200 should be aware of the theoretical status of their opening. What I meant that the theoretical status of the Dragon in particular is not in danger below the top levels.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2014-07-29. Score: 2
  
  The idea of Mr. Roman, I have see the video, is that the opening is somewhat blunt. But still he also gives clarifications that some lines are winning. The positions achieved will certainty not be the ones you achieve in most of your games. As another answerer mentioned, stick to the Grand Prix, or to another Anti-Sicilian, such as the Alapin.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2017-02-22. Score: 2
  
  The Dragon Opening is an Opening which should not be played below the 2000 ElO level for the Black Player . The main objective of Dragon for the Black is to sacrifice the c8 Rook for the c3 Knight which guards the White King when he does the long Castle . It is one of the most popular Exchange Sacrifice which Players at Master level and above do understand and can play it better. I am not saying that Players who are 1500 ~ Elo fails to understand .
  
  My Objective is if you understand the Counterattacking theme from black then you should go ahead to play the Dragon . Generally compared to other Sicilians White's attack comes very fast (Yugoslav Attack )because the pawn stands on g6 and Black has to be extra cautious because the h file gets opened very soon where White unites his Rooks on h-file and hover around Black's King . Black's game has to be ultra sharp to do the Counter attack . The Theory of Dragon even extends to 25-30 moves which the Black player should memorize in order to win the game . If he makes 2-3 incorrect moves he/she loses very soon .
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2017-02-21. Score: 2
  
  GM Gawain Jones (who plays this opening) just published a huge two volume work. His conclusion, of course, is that it is quite playable.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2014-12-05. Score: 0
  
  I played the Yugoslav attack when a IM played the Dragon against me, and in my chess area they do not know how to play the Dragon variations with me. It's quite solid with lots of tactical opportunities, however it's also dangerous for both sides so be careful when playing it.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_6**: This doesn't adress the question at all!  
  > **username_7**: How can it be both solid and dangerous? In chess, they're near antonyms ...  
  
  ---
  
  