Body: <p>The game analysis tool of chess.com tells me I should have done a move which looks impossible to me.</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/IYuji.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/IYuji.jpg" alt="how the situation looked" /></a>
  <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/TIpS1.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/TIpS1.jpg" alt="what the game tells me" /></a></p>
  <p>Obviously my move, e1, was very stupid. But what the game tells me seems impossible. Is it a bug? If so, what would have been the actual best move?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-03-20T14:35:29.423Z
Comments.Text: It is a well known rule, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Akavall
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-03-20T15:11:16.373Z
Comments.Text: Damn. Definitely not well known with chess noobs like me. Thank you for enlightening me!
Comments.UserDisplayName: josias
Tags: <rules><pawns><chess.com>
Title: Is there a rarely known rule about Pawns eating indirectly?
ThreadText: # Is there a rarely known rule about Pawns eating indirectly?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-03-20)
  
  The game analysis tool of chess.com tells me I should have done a move which looks impossible to me.
  
  [![how the situation looked](https://i.sstatic.net/IYuji.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/IYuji.jpg)
  [![what the game tells me](https://i.sstatic.net/TIpS1.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/TIpS1.jpg)
  
  Obviously my move, e1, was very stupid. But what the game tells me seems impossible. Is it a bug? If so, what would have been the actual best move?
  
  **Tags:** rules, pawns, chess.com
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: It is a well known rule, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant.  
  > **username_0**: Damn. Definitely not well known with chess noobs like me. Thank you for enlightening me!  
  
  ---
  
  ## 0 answers
  
  