Answers.Body: <p>I do not know what FIDE and their rules are,   but for our local games I would just push the clock and tell the other player to put all the pieces on the board properly before any of my time gets used up at all. </p>
  
  <p>Unless it was a FIDE match AND FIDE rules specified a specific action then I would not be waiting around wondering if an arbiter is watching. Too much risk that your flag falls and then straightening it all out will be hard and may not go in your favor.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-04-11T15:47:19.383Z
Answers.Text: any sources/links to provide?
Answers.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-29T13:56:56.363Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-29T13:56:56.363Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.Body: <p>The relevant section from the rules would be Article 7.4.1:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>If a player displaces one or more pieces, he shall re-establish the
    correct position in his own time.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>The rules do not specify a certain procedure, but what I have seen happening in practice is: Player A knocks a piece over on his opponent's time. Player B is now allowed to press the clock to make sure he does not lose time. After the correct position has been reestablished, player A will press the clock again so player B has the move. I certainly don't feel the rules mandate that the arbiter needs to be summoned in this case.</p>
  
  <p>If the displacement caused an unusual disturbance or the affected player is <em>very</em> low on time (&lt;10sec), as an arbiter I would consider applying Article 12.5 regarding external disturbances and add something in the range of 20-30 seconds to the clock of the affected player.</p>
  
  <p>The following objections could be raised, although I feel they are rather academic in nature:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>It would be in the spirit of the rules if the person displacing the pieces would stop their opponent's clock and start his own again. However, I have never seen this happening and it may well be inadvisable to do that just for practical reasons, depending on the circumstances.</li>
  <li>If the game is played with increment, the additional two clock presses add time to the players' clocks. Therefore, the clock settings (times and move counter) would be incorrect after such an incident. However, at least in the German-speaking chess community, Article 6.10.2 is generally considered to only apply in cases where there is a non-negligible time difference. As a rule of thumb, it should take an arbiter at most one minute to adjust clock settings. If the time differential to be corrected is smaller, the arbiter should not interfere. Additionally, the move counter of the clock is not a reliable indicator of the number of moves played.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>In the comments, Article 7.5.3 has been mentioned:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>If the player presses the clock without making a move, it shall be considered and penalized as if an illegal move.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>This article has been added fairly recently to make sure a player can be penalized for pressing the clock for no reason. It should not be applied if the player enforces the rules.</p>
  
  <p>Making a move and then expecting to correct the position of a displaced piece defeats the purpose of the rule: The distraction by the missing piece is immediately affecting the other player.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-29T14:11:05.947Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-02T20:10:01.313Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-01-02T20:10:01.313Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: chaosflaws
Body: <p>This question is prompted by an incident in today's World Blitz championship in Moscow as described and <a href="https://twitter.com/ChessbaseIndia/status/1211149111023374336" rel="noreferrer">shown in this tweet</a>.</p>
  
  <p>What happened was that Nakamura made a move, pressed the clock, on the way back from pressing the clock his hand caught his rook and knocked it off the board about 10 cm. He immediately picked up the rook and replaced it. This maybe took half a second. </p>
  
  <p>His opponent, Sergei Zhigalko, thought for about 12 seconds before having a long look around, presumably to see if an arbiter was watching the game. Then after another 2 or 3 seconds he gestures over to the arbiter to call him to the board and indicates something with his hand. Finally 22 seconds after the incident he reaches out to pause the clocks. There then follows a long discussion between the players and the arbiters which suggests that Zhigalko was trying to claim an illegal move before the game continues with no action taken.</p>
  
  <p>Nakamura acted perfectly correctly here IMHO, but what should he have done differently if instead of displacing the piece a few inches he had knocked it onto the floor requiring several seconds to retrieve and replace the piece? </p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-04-11T15:48:56.900Z
Comments.Text: note: there was a deleted answer that said: 'Playing a 15+0 rapid open, I saw sub16 world champion GM Ibragim Khamrakulov'
Comments.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Tags: <rules><blitz><pieces><chess-clocks>
Title: What should a player do in blitz if he knocks a piece on to the floor after pressing the clock?
ThreadText: # What should a player do in blitz if he knocks a piece on to the floor after pressing the clock?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-12-29)
  
  This question is prompted by an incident in today's World Blitz championship in Moscow as described and [shown in this tweet](https://twitter.com/ChessbaseIndia/status/1211149111023374336).
  
  What happened was that Nakamura made a move, pressed the clock, on the way back from pressing the clock his hand caught his rook and knocked it off the board about 10 cm. He immediately picked up the rook and replaced it. This maybe took half a second.
  
  His opponent, Sergei Zhigalko, thought for about 12 seconds before having a long look around, presumably to see if an arbiter was watching the game. Then after another 2 or 3 seconds he gestures over to the arbiter to call him to the board and indicates something with his hand. Finally 22 seconds after the incident he reaches out to pause the clocks. There then follows a long discussion between the players and the arbiters which suggests that Zhigalko was trying to claim an illegal move before the game continues with no action taken.
  
  Nakamura acted perfectly correctly here IMHO, but what should he have done differently if instead of displacing the piece a few inches he had knocked it onto the floor requiring several seconds to retrieve and replace the piece?
  
  **Tags:** rules, blitz, pieces, chess-clocks
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: note: there was a deleted answer that said: 'Playing a 15+0 rapid open, I saw sub16 world champion GM Ibragim Khamrakulov'  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-12-29. Score: 19 | Accepted answer
  
  The relevant section from the rules would be Article 7.4.1:
  
  > If a player displaces one or more pieces, he shall re-establish the
  > correct position in his own time.
  
  The rules do not specify a certain procedure, but what I have seen happening in practice is: Player A knocks a piece over on his opponent's time. Player B is now allowed to press the clock to make sure he does not lose time. After the correct position has been reestablished, player A will press the clock again so player B has the move. I certainly don't feel the rules mandate that the arbiter needs to be summoned in this case.
  
  If the displacement caused an unusual disturbance or the affected player is *very* low on time (<10sec), as an arbiter I would consider applying Article 12.5 regarding external disturbances and add something in the range of 20-30 seconds to the clock of the affected player.
  
  The following objections could be raised, although I feel they are rather academic in nature:
  
  * It would be in the spirit of the rules if the person displacing the pieces would stop their opponent's clock and start his own again. However, I have never seen this happening and it may well be inadvisable to do that just for practical reasons, depending on the circumstances.
  * If the game is played with increment, the additional two clock presses add time to the players' clocks. Therefore, the clock settings (times and move counter) would be incorrect after such an incident. However, at least in the German-speaking chess community, Article 6.10.2 is generally considered to only apply in cases where there is a non-negligible time difference. As a rule of thumb, it should take an arbiter at most one minute to adjust clock settings. If the time differential to be corrected is smaller, the arbiter should not interfere. Additionally, the move counter of the clock is not a reliable indicator of the number of moves played.
  
  In the comments, Article 7.5.3 has been mentioned:
  
  > If the player presses the clock without making a move, it shall be considered and penalized as if an illegal move.
  
  This article has been added fairly recently to make sure a player can be penalized for pressing the clock for no reason. It should not be applied if the player enforces the rules.
  
  Making a move and then expecting to correct the position of a displaced piece defeats the purpose of the rule: The distraction by the missing piece is immediately affecting the other player.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-12-29. Score: 3
  
  I do not know what FIDE and their rules are, but for our local games I would just push the clock and tell the other player to put all the pieces on the board properly before any of my time gets used up at all.
  
  Unless it was a FIDE match AND FIDE rules specified a specific action then I would not be waiting around wondering if an arbiter is watching. Too much risk that your flag falls and then straightening it all out will be hard and may not go in your favor.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: any sources/links to provide?  
  
  ---
  
  