Answers.Body: <p>She can claim a draw. Article 9.3 of the <a href="http://rules.fide.com/images/stories/Laws_of_Chess_2018_-_EB_approved_-_clean_version.pdf" rel="noreferrer">FIDE Laws of Chess, 2018</a>, emphasis mine:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p><strong>9.3</strong> The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:</p>
  <p><strong>9.3.1</strong> he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will result in thelast 50 moves by eachplayer having been made without the movement of any pawn and without any capture, <strong>or</strong></p>
  <p><strong>9.3.2</strong> the last 50 moves by each player <strong>have been completed</strong> without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>9.3.2 is the case you describe, where the moves have already been completed. 9.3.1 is the case that counts the move the player is about to make.</p>
  <p>Edit: but you link to the other question. In real tournament chess, checkmate would certainly trump this -- checkmate <em>ends the game</em>, so the other player would never get another turn to claim a draw in. But problems <em>are not tournament chess</em> and they use their own conventions, like the famous rule that castling is allowed unless you can prove it isn't.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-26T09:37:29.533Z
Answers.Text: The silly loophole over the board is that the player who is about to checkmate on 50.0th move could claim a draw before executing the mating move. This and the castling heresy are two issues that have stopped 50 move rule from being treated coherently in the Codex like Draw by Repetition
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-26T09:42:52.477Z
Answers.Text: Well, over the board he could just _offer_ a draw in case of being forced to checkmate, or let his clock run out. Over the board is not very related to problem chess...
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-27T00:59:31.080Z
Answers.Text: I don't understand the remark in your edit. In the linked problem, there is a mate in 3, which is interrupted by the opponent claiming a draw after just 2 moves. There is no mate-trumps-draw, because the draw comes first.
Answers.UserDisplayName: amalloy
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-08-26T07:22:36.353Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-26T07:32:01.453Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-06-17T09:59:59.497Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Body: <p>Suppose that, as a result of White's move, there have now been 100 single-moves (50 full moves) since the most recent pawn move or capture. White didn't claim a draw because they're going for the win. Every option for Black's next move is a pawn move or a capture. Does this mean that Black has now lost the opportunity to claim a draw under the 50-move rule?</p>
  
  <p>(Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) suggests that they have, but I wanted to check. If I've understood correctly, the opportunity does not just occur on the 100th non-pawn non-capture and then vanish forever --- you may claim at any point from the 100th onwards in a series of more than 100 --- but there must be a series of at least 100 including the very turn in which you make your claim. That is, retrospective claims do not stand.) </p>
  
  <p>This question was prompted by my reading up on Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) to respond to <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/25194/identify-a-problem-where-a-potentially-winning-move-draws-because-of-the-50-move">this question</a>.</p>
  
Tags: <rules><50-move-rule>
Title: 50-move rule: only the last 50 or any consecutive 50?
ThreadText: # 50-move rule: only the last 50 or any consecutive 50?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-08-26)
  
  Suppose that, as a result of White's move, there have now been 100 single-moves (50 full moves) since the most recent pawn move or capture. White didn't claim a draw because they're going for the win. Every option for Black's next move is a pawn move or a capture. Does this mean that Black has now lost the opportunity to claim a draw under the 50-move rule?
  
  (Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) suggests that they have, but I wanted to check. If I've understood correctly, the opportunity does not just occur on the 100th non-pawn non-capture and then vanish forever --- you may claim at any point from the 100th onwards in a series of more than 100 --- but there must be a series of at least 100 including the very turn in which you make your claim. That is, retrospective claims do not stand.)
  
  This question was prompted by my reading up on Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) to respond to [this question](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/25194/identify-a-problem-where-a-potentially-winning-move-draws-because-of-the-50-move).
  
  **Tags:** rules, 50-move-rule
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-08-26. Score: 7 | Accepted answer
  
  She can claim a draw. Article 9.3 of the [FIDE Laws of Chess, 2018](http://rules.fide.com/images/stories/Laws_of_Chess_2018_-_EB_approved_-_clean_version.pdf), emphasis mine:
  
  > **9.3** The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:
  >
  > **9.3.1** he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will result in thelast 50 moves by eachplayer having been made without the movement of any pawn and without any capture, **or**
  >
  > **9.3.2** the last 50 moves by each player **have been completed** without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.
  
  9.3.2 is the case you describe, where the moves have already been completed. 9.3.1 is the case that counts the move the player is about to make.
  
  Edit: but you link to the other question. In real tournament chess, checkmate would certainly trump this -- checkmate *ends the game*, so the other player would never get another turn to claim a draw in. But problems *are not tournament chess* and they use their own conventions, like the famous rule that castling is allowed unless you can prove it isn't.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: The silly loophole over the board is that the player who is about to checkmate on 50.0th move could claim a draw before executing the mating move. This and the castling heresy are two issues that have stopped 50 move rule from being treated coherently in the Codex like Draw by Repetition  
  > **username_1**: Well, over the board he could just _offer_ a draw in case of being forced to checkmate, or let his clock run out. Over the board is not very related to problem chess...  
  > **username_3**: I don't understand the remark in your edit. In the linked problem, there is a mate in 3, which is interrupted by the opponent claiming a draw after just 2 moves. There is no mate-trumps-draw, because the draw comes first.  
  
  ---
  
  