Answers.Body: <p>I would say you gave yourself an answer. If a computer analysis with depth 43 does not find a clear solution, the game would end probably in a draw if both sides play perfectly. Nevertheless, this situation is extremely complicated to analyze for a human and therefore I would say that for both sides a win is possible.</p>
  <p>If you would like to know how to advance in this position for one or both sides I would suggest changing the question.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-07-09T00:40:52.400Z
Answers.Text: Good intuition in this case. I ran an analysis Houdini 6.02 at 43/100 with high variety (40 minutes) and, after that, doing a second iterazion at a critical point. It ends in a draw. In the game, howecer, Sanikidze ended up losing.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Stefano
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-07-08T14:46:19.737Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-07-08T14:46:19.737Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: maxmitz
Body: <p>The following endgame, from Almasi vs Sanikidze, is becoming a real riddle. The position, after the 43th move by Almasi, is the following:</p>
  <pre><code>[fen &quot;8/1N4k1/7p/4ppbP/4P3/1PP5/1K6/8 b - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>White King on b2 Knight on b7 pawns on b3 c3 e4 h5.
  Black to move King on g7 Bishop on g5 pawns on e5 f5 h6. Black to move.</p>
  <p>Even on lichess.com evaluation goes up and down as far as depth 43(!) without reaching a clear verdict. With perfect play, is a win for White or a draw?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-07-03T22:32:19.453Z
Comments.Text: I do not have access to talkchess.com
Comments.UserDisplayName: user27314
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-07-04T10:27:32.273Z
Comments.Text: To adreasthea What has being said to talkchess forum?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Stefano
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-07-05T09:46:20.047Z
Comments.Text: Why are there two downvotes ? This is quite an interesting endgame to analyse...
Comments.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-07-08T15:08:52.720Z
Comments.Text: Can you show what has been played in the game ? Analysing this to the end might be challenging...
Comments.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Tags: <endgame>
Title: Interesting knight vs bishop endgame
ThreadText: # Interesting knight vs bishop endgame
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-07-02)
  
  The following endgame, from Almasi vs Sanikidze, is becoming a real riddle. The position, after the 43th move by Almasi, is the following:
  [fen "8/1N4k1/7p/4ppbP/4P3/1PP5/1K6/8 b - - 0 1"]
  
  White King on b2 Knight on b7 pawns on b3 c3 e4 h5.
  Black to move King on g7 Bishop on g5 pawns on e5 f5 h6. Black to move.
  Even on lichess.com evaluation goes up and down as far as depth 43(!) without reaching a clear verdict. With perfect play, is a win for White or a draw?
  
  **Tags:** endgame
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: I do not have access to talkchess.com  
  > **username_0**: To adreasthea What has being said to talkchess forum?  
  > **username_2**: Why are there two downvotes ? This is quite an interesting endgame to analyse...  
  > **username_2**: Can you show what has been played in the game ? Analysing this to the end might be challenging...  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2021-07-08. Score: 1
  
  I would say you gave yourself an answer. If a computer analysis with depth 43 does not find a clear solution, the game would end probably in a draw if both sides play perfectly. Nevertheless, this situation is extremely complicated to analyze for a human and therefore I would say that for both sides a win is possible.
  
  If you would like to know how to advance in this position for one or both sides I would suggest changing the question.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Good intuition in this case. I ran an analysis Houdini 6.02 at 43/100 with high variety (40 minutes) and, after that, doing a second iterazion at a critical point. It ends in a draw. In the game, howecer, Sanikidze ended up losing.  
  
  ---
  
  