Answers.Body: <p>Having had experience with this exact problem myself a while back, there is only one advice that I can give: play as much as possible! If the time management issues you're describing are a new occurrence they are most likely due to you being rusty, and they should be corrected by regular tournament play. It takes time to reinstate the trust you had in your own in-game judgement after a long period of inactivity, but it will most likely come back if you keep on playing regularly.</p>
  
  <p>As a final note: studying chess theory is never a bad idea if you're looking to improve, but don't expect it to fix your problems with time management.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-09-09T22:45:53.447Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-09-09T22:45:53.447Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Scounged
Answers.Body: <p>Having come back from a 2 year break, struggled, then went on to gain 200 points in that year, this is my advice.</p>
  
  <p>10 tactics a day, master games, 1 long game a day, and endgames. You will not remember the openings you forgot, relearning them perfectly is too time consuming. Relearn them by analyzing your long games and master games.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-09-11T08:25:28.473Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-09-11T08:25:28.473Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hockeyfan19
Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>"should I play Bd3 or Bc4 in the opening?", or "should I take with the c or e pawn?"</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>It seems like you forgot the common attacks and situations that your opening falls victim to later in the game based on earlier moves.</p>
  
  <p>These types of dilemmas are legitimate, and no amount of studying is really going to bring out the problems you will encounter later in the game because of how deep and complex the nuance is at this point.</p>
  
  <p>As an example, I had an opening once where I would play as Black and fianchetto the queen side. In certain openings, if I encountered c3 or g3, I absolutely had to change the entire development of my opening because 20 moves later I was going to be in serious trouble on my king side. I only learned this through playing dozens if not hundreds of games.</p>
  
  <p>Which, to get to the point, is the solution for you here: to get back to playing games. Play a computer set to ludicrous mode. Set it for a rating of 4000 if possible. This will quickly allow you to discern the problems later on in the game or mid game based on your decision of Bd3 versus Bc4, cx versus ex, and any other broad variety of nuance you used to encounter that will surely come back to you the more you play.</p>
  
  <p>When you stop playing, it is your general knowledge of your goto openings that languishes, not your tactics or overall strategy. Studying tactics will not yield the benefits of just playing full games, or games until there is a clear victor.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-09-11T09:52:29.700Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2018-09-11T10:00:49.607Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2018-09-11T10:00:49.607Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Travis J
Body: <p>I stopped playing for 2 years and then I had some periods where I played and studied chess, but never for more than a few months in a row. I have an ELO of 1900.</p>
  
  <p>After these 2 years without playing, I noticed that I take way more time to think during my games (did I lose confidence?), sometimes hesitating for a long time between two good moves that should not matter that much (like "should I play Bd3 or Bc4 in the opening?", or "should I take with the c or e pawn?").
  I also noticed that I forgot some opening lines (which I think is completely normal) and some endgames too.
  I almost always end up with time trouble, even though I read guides about time management.</p>
  
  <p>My question is: what should I study to get back to my level before I stopped playing?</p>
  
  <p>I used to do a 15 min tactics on ChessTempo and Lichess, but I stopped because in a game you never know when there's a combination and the puzzles on ChessTempo became so difficult that I often ended up playing the moves I thought was best because I could not find the combination of +10 moves in my allocated time frame.
  Now, I do the exercises from Practical Chess Exercises which are more similar to what you have to do during an actual game. I also do the very easy exercises in Ct-Art 6 because I think it takes me too much time to find these in a real game.
  I also started to review my endgames and I do endgames exercises on Chessable.</p>
  
  <p>For the openings, I tried to switch to new openings, but it did not go well, probably because I needed more time to learn them.
  So, what I do now is I review my old openings.
  I'm not sure I should review my openings though, because I'm pretty sure I don't lose my games in the opening.</p>
  
  <p>Is there anything else I should do?
  Should I stop review my openings and focus on other weaknesses?</p>
  
  <p><strong>Edit:</strong> By the way, I did play a few tournaments (not as much as before I stopped playing, but still) and in a club since I stopped playing.</p>
  
Tags: <training>
Title: What to study after someone stopped playing for years?
ThreadText: # What to study after someone stopped playing for years?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2018-09-09)
  
  I stopped playing for 2 years and then I had some periods where I played and studied chess, but never for more than a few months in a row. I have an ELO of 1900.
  
  After these 2 years without playing, I noticed that I take way more time to think during my games (did I lose confidence?), sometimes hesitating for a long time between two good moves that should not matter that much (like "should I play Bd3 or Bc4 in the opening?", or "should I take with the c or e pawn?").
  I also noticed that I forgot some opening lines (which I think is completely normal) and some endgames too.
  I almost always end up with time trouble, even though I read guides about time management.
  
  My question is: what should I study to get back to my level before I stopped playing?
  
  I used to do a 15 min tactics on ChessTempo and Lichess, but I stopped because in a game you never know when there's a combination and the puzzles on ChessTempo became so difficult that I often ended up playing the moves I thought was best because I could not find the combination of +10 moves in my allocated time frame.
  Now, I do the exercises from Practical Chess Exercises which are more similar to what you have to do during an actual game. I also do the very easy exercises in Ct-Art 6 because I think it takes me too much time to find these in a real game.
  I also started to review my endgames and I do endgames exercises on Chessable.
  
  For the openings, I tried to switch to new openings, but it did not go well, probably because I needed more time to learn them.
  So, what I do now is I review my old openings.
  I'm not sure I should review my openings though, because I'm pretty sure I don't lose my games in the opening.
  
  Is there anything else I should do?
  Should I stop review my openings and focus on other weaknesses?
  
  **Edit:** By the way, I did play a few tournaments (not as much as before I stopped playing, but still) and in a club since I stopped playing.
  
  **Tags:** training
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2018-09-09. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  Having had experience with this exact problem myself a while back, there is only one advice that I can give: play as much as possible! If the time management issues you're describing are a new occurrence they are most likely due to you being rusty, and they should be corrected by regular tournament play. It takes time to reinstate the trust you had in your own in-game judgement after a long period of inactivity, but it will most likely come back if you keep on playing regularly.
  
  As a final note: studying chess theory is never a bad idea if you're looking to improve, but don't expect it to fix your problems with time management.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2018-09-11. Score: 1
  
  Having come back from a 2 year break, struggled, then went on to gain 200 points in that year, this is my advice.
  
  10 tactics a day, master games, 1 long game a day, and endgames. You will not remember the openings you forgot, relearning them perfectly is too time consuming. Relearn them by analyzing your long games and master games.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2018-09-11. Score: 0
  
  > "should I play Bd3 or Bc4 in the opening?", or "should I take with the c or e pawn?"
  
  It seems like you forgot the common attacks and situations that your opening falls victim to later in the game based on earlier moves.
  
  These types of dilemmas are legitimate, and no amount of studying is really going to bring out the problems you will encounter later in the game because of how deep and complex the nuance is at this point.
  
  As an example, I had an opening once where I would play as Black and fianchetto the queen side. In certain openings, if I encountered c3 or g3, I absolutely had to change the entire development of my opening because 20 moves later I was going to be in serious trouble on my king side. I only learned this through playing dozens if not hundreds of games.
  
  Which, to get to the point, is the solution for you here: to get back to playing games. Play a computer set to ludicrous mode. Set it for a rating of 4000 if possible. This will quickly allow you to discern the problems later on in the game or mid game based on your decision of Bd3 versus Bc4, cx versus ex, and any other broad variety of nuance you used to encounter that will surely come back to you the more you play.
  
  When you stop playing, it is your general knowledge of your goto openings that languishes, not your tactics or overall strategy. Studying tactics will not yield the benefits of just playing full games, or games until there is a clear victor.
  
  
  ---
  
  