Answers.Body: <p>The official ECO (Encyclopedia of Chess Openings) scheme is only A00-E99 (i.e. letter followed by 2 digits). There have been numerous attempts to further clarify various openings, but none have really caught on.</p>
  
  <p>There is the "/01-/99" example that you gave in your post, and SCID has its own version of extensions with letters a-z following the main code.  Neither one is widely supported.</p>
  
  <p>New In Chess has a fairly robust classification system, but it is unrelated to the standard ECO codes.</p>
  
  <p>Perhaps the most prevalent and most successful system for specifying openings, however, is simply the full name of the opening.  For example, <em>B33</em> is the <em>Sveshnikov Sicilian</em>, and it can be further described as <em>Sveshnikov Sicilian with 9. Nd5</em>, etc.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T20:28:46.040Z
Answers.Text: From what I recall - the "/01-/99" example is stemming from  ECO publications themselves, but I am not sure if they are kept consistent between editions...
Answers.UserDisplayName: Joe
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T21:39:59.373Z
Answers.Text: @Joe, the main ECO codes themselves changed slightly between the editions, so it's very likely that if the slash extensions came from ECO, then they would have changed much more significantly than the main codes.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T19:30:23.573Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-10-28T19:30:23.573Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew
Answers.Body: <p>A particular ECO index might split further into sub-indices like B33a, B33b, B33c, etc. The number of such sub-indices varies (maybe it goes up to <em>y</em>, or only to <em>t</em>, or ...), and some indices don't have any sub-indices. As for a place where these are well-documented, the free database program <a href="http://scid.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Scid</a> does a great job. It automatically tells you what ECO classification you are in as you view/enter a game. More than that, though, you can bring up its ECO Browser that offers a summary of the ECO code you're in if you want to see the sub-indices laid out.</p>
  
  <p>For instance, when I opened Scid and entered the moves <code>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6</code>, the info panel below the board indicated that we had entered into ECO index B33a. That text is clickable, and doing so brought up Scid's summary for ECO B33, complete with variation names and clickable lines (which will bring the final position up on the board), as seen in the following image:</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Lhj7J.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T14:44:25.410Z
Answers.Text: That is pretty cool. Is this documented outside of SCID though? I would be curious about where SCID developers got this data from ...
Answers.UserDisplayName: Joe
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T17:16:24.910Z
Answers.Text: @Joe, I'm actually not sure. Come to think of it, I simply *assumed* that the data Scid presents comes straight out from ECO (as opposed to being their own creation, say, because that would have been a *lot* of extraneous work in Scid's development). But I'm not familiar enough with actual ECO materials to be sure that this truly is their exact breakdown; looking at your question again, you say you've seen e.g. B33/01, B33/22 somewhere. Do you recall where?
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-11-03T16:31:30.993Z
Answers.Text: If you are in ChessBase Light, and search games in the database - in the ECO field, it gives you range between A00 and E99/99. I have not actually experimented to see what it does with it, so not sure if there are a differences in search results between  E99/99 and  E99/00.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Joe
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-28T02:57:22.250Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-10-28T02:57:22.250Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.Body: <p>Those sub-categories E99/XX are likely from the <a href="https://sahovski.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Chess Informant</a> ECO, I have not seen them in other resources.</p>
  
  <p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/YVvBT.png" alt="enter image description here"></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-31T17:37:43.423Z
Answers.Text: This looks like ECO in digital form. do you know if the printed edition have the same sub-categories?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Joe
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-10-31T01:21:52.637Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-08-03T18:06:16.343Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-08-03T18:06:16.343Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: prusswan
Body: <p>For example an ECO index B33 can be used to describe opening theory that barely fits into a thick book. Is there an established system to classify variations further? I have seen examples of indexes that look like B33/01, or B33/22 but I wonder if those are well documented anywhere?</p>
  
Tags: <opening>
Title: Does ECO openings classification have an established more detailed specification - by sub indexes?
ThreadText: # Does ECO openings classification have an established more detailed specification - by sub indexes?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-10-27)
  
  For example an ECO index B33 can be used to describe opening theory that barely fits into a thick book. Is there an established system to classify variations further? I have seen examples of indexes that look like B33/01, or B33/22 but I wonder if those are well documented anywhere?
  
  **Tags:** opening
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2012-10-28. Score: 3 | Accepted answer
  
  The official ECO (Encyclopedia of Chess Openings) scheme is only A00-E99 (i.e. letter followed by 2 digits). There have been numerous attempts to further clarify various openings, but none have really caught on.
  
  There is the "/01-/99" example that you gave in your post, and SCID has its own version of extensions with letters a-z following the main code. Neither one is widely supported.
  
  New In Chess has a fairly robust classification system, but it is unrelated to the standard ECO codes.
  
  Perhaps the most prevalent and most successful system for specifying openings, however, is simply the full name of the opening. For example, *B33* is the *Sveshnikov Sicilian*, and it can be further described as *Sveshnikov Sicilian with 9. Nd5*, etc.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: From what I recall - the "/01-/99" example is stemming from  ECO publications themselves, but I am not sure if they are kept consistent between editions...  
  > **username_1**: @username_0, the main ECO codes themselves changed slightly between the editions, so it's very likely that if the slash extensions came from ECO, then they would have changed much more significantly than the main codes.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2012-10-28. Score: 4
  
  A particular ECO index might split further into sub-indices like B33a, B33b, B33c, etc. The number of such sub-indices varies (maybe it goes up to *y*, or only to *t*, or ...), and some indices don't have any sub-indices. As for a place where these are well-documented, the free database program [Scid](http://scid.sourceforge.net/) does a great job. It automatically tells you what ECO classification you are in as you view/enter a game. More than that, though, you can bring up its ECO Browser that offers a summary of the ECO code you're in if you want to see the sub-indices laid out.
  
  For instance, when I opened Scid and entered the moves `1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6`, the info panel below the board indicated that we had entered into ECO index B33a. That text is clickable, and doing so brought up Scid's summary for ECO B33, complete with variation names and clickable lines (which will bring the final position up on the board), as seen in the following image:
  
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Lhj7J.png)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: That is pretty cool. Is this documented outside of SCID though? I would be curious about where SCID developers got this data from ...  
  > **username_2**: @username_0, I'm actually not sure. Come to think of it, I simply *assumed* that the data Scid presents comes straight out from ECO (as opposed to being their own creation, say, because that would have been a *lot* of extraneous work in Scid's development). But I'm not familiar enough with actual ECO materials to be sure that this truly is their exact breakdown; looking at your question again, you say you've seen e.g. B33/01, B33/22 somewhere. Do you recall where?  
  > **username_0**: If you are in ChessBase Light, and search games in the database - in the ECO field, it gives you range between A00 and E99/99. I have not actually experimented to see what it does with it, so not sure if there are a differences in search results between  E99/99 and  E99/00.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2012-10-31. Score: 2
  
  Those sub-categories E99/XX are likely from the [Chess Informant](https://sahovski.com/) ECO, I have not seen them in other resources.
  
  ![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/YVvBT.png)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: This looks like ECO in digital form. do you know if the printed edition have the same sub-categories?  
  
  ---
  
  