Answers.Body: <p><strong>FIDE response</strong>:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>FIDE respects that every player makes his own decisions and regrets that GM Magnus Carlsen has expressed his desire to withdraw from the upcoming Candidates Matches. It is always a big loss for any event when a player of Magnus Carlsen’s strength is not participating. FIDE’s policy is to review regularly the World Championship cycle after consultation with the top world players. At this point in time, the current cycle is in its final stages and it is not possible for FIDE to change its regulations. In the case of GM Magnus Carlsen not participating, according to regulations GM Alexander Grischuk from Russia will be his replacement.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Have to love the irony in the &quot;too late to make changes&quot; claim, as one of the reasons Carlsen gave for not playing was the fact FIDE kept making changes all the way through the cycle. (Basically, the 2011 cycle was a hot mess. At the time of his withdrawal, no player, Carlsen included, had even seen a contract for the event or reliably knew what the terms would be.)</p>
  <p><a href="https://www.365chess.com/news/grischuk-will-replace-carlsen-in-the-candidates-matches-2011/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.365chess.com/news/grischuk-will-replace-carlsen-in-the-candidates-matches-2011/</a></p>
  <p><strong>Changes</strong>:</p>
  <p>The championship cycle is shorter, FIDE didn't change the rules in the middle of the cycle. No matches, just a super-tournament to select the challenger. From outward appearances, none of these changes was made in response to Carlsen. (In fact, Carlsen, in his withdrawal letter, states he isn't trying to get them to make changes, just stating the reason he's finding it hard to find the motivation to prepare. Since several of the reasons he gives are still in force today, I'll let others speculate on which of his issues was paramount.)</p>
  <p><strong>For trivia buffs</strong>:</p>
  <ol>
  <li><p>I think Carlsen in 2011 became the first player in history to withdraw from the same championship cycle <em>twice</em>. He first withdrew from the Grand Prix cycle, which was supposed to select the majority of the challengers, then was reseeded back into the cycle by virtue of his spot at the top of the ratings list (three slots were for the top 3 finishers in the Grand Prix, the loser of the previous WCC match, the winner of the 2009 World Cup, the highest rated player, the loser of the final candidates match from the previous cycle, and one player nominated by the organizers). FIDE's response was to replace Carlsen with Grischuk -- IIRC, Kramnik was the a qualifier from the GP and <em>also</em> the second highest rated so he essentially took Carlsen's spot as the top-rated and his GP qualification went to Grischuk.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>If you were looking for punishments, FIDE really cannot force <em>anyone</em> to play in their events, and rarely (I said rarely but I can't think of single instance offhand) punishes a player for declining to play. Chessplayers are not the slaves of any organization, no matter how much some of politicians in charge want them to be.</p>
  </li>
  </ol>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-12-17T09:51:08.017Z
Answers.Text: thanks Arlen. i was absolutely not looking for punishments except vacuously because of course people play or not play according to their convenience...
Answers.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-12-27T18:45:53.530Z
Answers.Text: Interesting edit. The punishments paragraph wasn't trivia, and the "For trivia buffs" bit was just introducing the trivia item, not an entire list. I've given up trying to ensure what I meant to say doesn't get distorted by editors (this edit seems well-meaning, but others haven't seemed so).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Arlen
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-12-15T17:35:15.180Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-12-17T09:50:30.357Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2021-12-17T09:50:30.357Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Arlen
Body: <p>In <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/2104/why-did-magnus-carlsen-drop-out-of-world-championship-in-2011">Why did Magnus Carlsen drop out of World Championship in 2011?</a></p>
  <p>we see magnus said</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>After careful consideration I’ve reached the conclusion that the ongoing 2008–2012 cycle does not represent a system, sufficiently modern and fair, to provide the motivation I need to go through a lengthy process of preparations and matches and to perform at my best.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>What did FIDE do/say in response to this? Or at least what changes did FIDE make after this (whether or not it was necessarily in response to this) ?</p>
  
Tags: <history><fide><world-championship><famous-players><carlsen>
Title: What did FIDE do/say in response to Magnus Carlsen's non-participation in the candidates match for the 2011 world championship?
ThreadText: # What did FIDE do/say in response to Magnus Carlsen's non-participation in the candidates match for the 2011 world championship?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-12-04)
  
  In [Why did Magnus Carlsen drop out of World Championship in 2011?](https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/2104/why-did-magnus-carlsen-drop-out-of-world-championship-in-2011)
  
  we see magnus said
  
  > After careful consideration I’ve reached the conclusion that the ongoing 2008–2012 cycle does not represent a system, sufficiently modern and fair, to provide the motivation I need to go through a lengthy process of preparations and matches and to perform at my best.
  
  What did FIDE do/say in response to this? Or at least what changes did FIDE make after this (whether or not it was necessarily in response to this) ?
  
  **Tags:** history, fide, world-championship, famous-players, carlsen
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2021-12-15. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  **FIDE response**:
  
  > FIDE respects that every player makes his own decisions and regrets that GM Magnus Carlsen has expressed his desire to withdraw from the upcoming Candidates Matches. It is always a big loss for any event when a player of Magnus Carlsen’s strength is not participating. FIDE’s policy is to review regularly the World Championship cycle after consultation with the top world players. At this point in time, the current cycle is in its final stages and it is not possible for FIDE to change its regulations. In the case of GM Magnus Carlsen not participating, according to regulations GM Alexander Grischuk from Russia will be his replacement.
  
  Have to love the irony in the "too late to make changes" claim, as one of the reasons Carlsen gave for not playing was the fact FIDE kept making changes all the way through the cycle. (Basically, the 2011 cycle was a hot mess. At the time of his withdrawal, no player, Carlsen included, had even seen a contract for the event or reliably knew what the terms would be.)
  
  <https://www.365chess.com/news/grischuk-will-replace-carlsen-in-the-candidates-matches-2011/>
  
  **Changes**:
  
  The championship cycle is shorter, FIDE didn't change the rules in the middle of the cycle. No matches, just a super-tournament to select the challenger. From outward appearances, none of these changes was made in response to Carlsen. (In fact, Carlsen, in his withdrawal letter, states he isn't trying to get them to make changes, just stating the reason he's finding it hard to find the motivation to prepare. Since several of the reasons he gives are still in force today, I'll let others speculate on which of his issues was paramount.)
  
  **For trivia buffs**:
  
  1. I think Carlsen in 2011 became the first player in history to withdraw from the same championship cycle *twice*. He first withdrew from the Grand Prix cycle, which was supposed to select the majority of the challengers, then was reseeded back into the cycle by virtue of his spot at the top of the ratings list (three slots were for the top 3 finishers in the Grand Prix, the loser of the previous WCC match, the winner of the 2009 World Cup, the highest rated player, the loser of the final candidates match from the previous cycle, and one player nominated by the organizers). FIDE's response was to replace Carlsen with Grischuk -- IIRC, Kramnik was the a qualifier from the GP and *also* the second highest rated so he essentially took Carlsen's spot as the top-rated and his GP qualification went to Grischuk.
  2. If you were looking for punishments, FIDE really cannot force *anyone* to play in their events, and rarely (I said rarely but I can't think of single instance offhand) punishes a player for declining to play. Chessplayers are not the slaves of any organization, no matter how much some of politicians in charge want them to be.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: thanks username_1. i was absolutely not looking for punishments except vacuously because of course people play or not play according to their convenience...  
  > **username_1**: Interesting edit. The punishments paragraph wasn't trivia, and the "For trivia buffs" bit was just introducing the trivia item, not an entire list. I've given up trying to ensure what I meant to say doesn't get distorted by editors (this edit seems well-meaning, but others haven't seemed so).  
  
  ---
  
  