Answers.Body: <p>The 6...Bxf3 tactic wins the d4 pawn by removing its defender. Sure, it gives up the two bishops to do so, and that's the reason why black's not a full point up in evaluation. But that's not enough compensation for even a human white, and the computer cares about it even less.</p>
  <p>After 6... Qc7 the tactic no longer works (The d5 pawn is also hanging after ...Bxf3 Qxf3, and ...Nxc2 won't work if it doesn't come with check because the black king is exposed) and so white can forgo c3 and ends up having gained the tempo of castling in exchange, making this better than the other line.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-12-20T01:42:21.407Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-12-20T01:42:21.407Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Chessanator
Answers.Body: <p>In case anybody's wondering why after 6 0-0? Black doesn't keep the Bishop pair and play Nxd4 directly, which may seem even better: That falls into a trap familiar (with colors reversed) from the QGD, losing a piece to 7 Nxd4! because after Bxd1 8 Bb5+ Qd7 9 Bxd7+ and 10 Rxd1 (or first 9 Rxd1) White's still ahead N for P and should win the ending easily.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-12-22T02:17:57.503Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-12-22T02:17:57.503Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Noam D. Elkies
Answers.Body: <p>After 6.O-O Bxf3 7.Qxf3, Black plays Nxd4 and is up a central pawn. That's enough for the evaluations to flip that much.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-12-20T01:35:00.217Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-12-20T01:35:00.217Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: D M
Answers.Body: <p>I add another answer since the crucial point hasn't been addressed, methinks.
  Indeed, after 6...Qc7 7.c3 it's a simple transpose and any decent algorithm
  shouldn't depend on move order to the position.</p>
  <p>But White plays 7.h3. Black now can't win d4 (d5 hangs as well) after Bxf3,
  so this merely cedes the bishop pair. And if 7...Bh5, 8.g4 Bg6 9.c4. (Computer
  are never afraid. Unsurprisingly, no human - on Lichess - ever tried this.
  Even I wouldn't. Evaluation is a slight advantage for White.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-12-20T17:08:51.497Z
Answers.Text: This is a summary of the other already useful answers and adds an explanation why Qc7 can be punished concretely. Incredible that White can get away with such drastic g4 stuff. It's still hard to comprehend why this is so good for White. I suppose it has a lot to to do with dynamic factors.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauptideal
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-12-20T09:13:25.180Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-12-20T09:13:25.180Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Body: <p>In the position after</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;&quot;] 
  [startlfipped &quot;10&quot;]
  [Startply &quot;10&quot;]
  
  1. e4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. d4 Nc6 5. Bd3 Bg4 6. O-O? Bxf3! (6...Qc7? 7. c3) 7. Qxf3 Nxe4 
        
  </code></pre>
  <p>White has played inaccurately because Black can get a better version of the mainline of the exchange variation, as White cannot easily develop the bishop to f4 after 6. c3 and 6. ..Qc7 (this is the engine recommendation and the recommendation in my book).</p>
  <p>However, when White instead plays 6. O-O, the engine thinks that Black is already better (-0.6) after taking on f3 (6. ..Bxf3). 6. ..Qc7 however is a sizeable mistake that not only throws away the advantage but even puts Black on the backfoot who then already has a pretty worrisome position (0.8).</p>
  <p>I don't understand why</p>
  <ol>
  <li>
  <ol start="6">
  <li>O-O is so bad for White and why ..Bxf3 is so strong in response</li>
  </ol>
  </li>
  <li>
  <ol start="6">
  <li>..Qc7 is such a massive mistake, even though it still denies the natural development of the dark-squared bishop and is the best move when White plays 6. c3.</li>
  </ol>
  </li>
  </ol>
  <p>How could this be explained?</p>
  
Tags: <opening><caro-kann><development><prophylaxis>
Title: When and why is it good to deny the development of White's dark squared bishop in the Caro-Kann exchange variation?
ThreadText: # When and why is it good to deny the development of White's dark squared bishop in the Caro-Kann exchange variation?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-12-20)
  
  In the position after
  [FEN ""] 
  [startlfipped "10"]
  [Startply "10"]
  
  1. e4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. d4 Nc6 5. Bd3 Bg4 6. O-O? Bxf3! (6...Qc7? 7. c3) 7. Qxf3 Nxe4 
        
  
  White has played inaccurately because Black can get a better version of the mainline of the exchange variation, as White cannot easily develop the bishop to f4 after 6. c3 and 6. ..Qc7 (this is the engine recommendation and the recommendation in my book).
  However, when White instead plays 6. O-O, the engine thinks that Black is already better (-0.6) after taking on f3 (6. ..Bxf3). 6. ..Qc7 however is a sizeable mistake that not only throws away the advantage but even puts Black on the backfoot who then already has a pretty worrisome position (0.8).
  I don't understand why
  
  
  
  O-O is so bad for White and why ..Bxf3 is so strong in response
  
  
  
  
  ..Qc7 is such a massive mistake, even though it still denies the natural development of the dark-squared bishop and is the best move when White plays 6. c3.
  
  
  
  How could this be explained?
  
  **Tags:** opening, caro-kann, development, prophylaxis
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2022-12-20. Score: 4 | Accepted answer
  
  I add another answer since the crucial point hasn't been addressed, methinks.
  Indeed, after 6...Qc7 7.c3 it's a simple transpose and any decent algorithm
  shouldn't depend on move order to the position.
  
  But White plays 7.h3. Black now can't win d4 (d5 hangs as well) after Bxf3,
  so this merely cedes the bishop pair. And if 7...Bh5, 8.g4 Bg6 9.c4. (Computer
  are never afraid. Unsurprisingly, no human - on Lichess - ever tried this.
  Even I wouldn't. Evaluation is a slight advantage for White.)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: This is a summary of the other already useful answers and adds an explanation why Qc7 can be punished concretely. Incredible that White can get away with such drastic g4 stuff. It's still hard to comprehend why this is so good for White. I suppose it has a lot to to do with dynamic factors.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-12-20. Score: 4
  
  The 6...Bxf3 tactic wins the d4 pawn by removing its defender. Sure, it gives up the two bishops to do so, and that's the reason why black's not a full point up in evaluation. But that's not enough compensation for even a human white, and the computer cares about it even less.
  
  After 6... Qc7 the tactic no longer works (The d5 pawn is also hanging after ...Bxf3 Qxf3, and ...Nxc2 won't work if it doesn't come with check because the black king is exposed) and so white can forgo c3 and ends up having gained the tempo of castling in exchange, making this better than the other line.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2022-12-22. Score: 2
  
  In case anybody's wondering why after 6 0-0? Black doesn't keep the Bishop pair and play Nxd4 directly, which may seem even better: That falls into a trap familiar (with colors reversed) from the QGD, losing a piece to 7 Nxd4! because after Bxd1 8 Bb5+ Qd7 9 Bxd7+ and 10 Rxd1 (or first 9 Rxd1) White's still ahead N for P and should win the ending easily.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2022-12-20. Score: 1
  
  After 6.O-O Bxf3 7.Qxf3, Black plays Nxd4 and is up a central pawn. That's enough for the evaluations to flip that much.
  
  
  ---
  
  