Answers.Body: <p>Here's a preliminary answer to where such a belief about chess pawns could possibly have come from. In the Japanese variant Shogi, in which an opponent's captured pieces may be placed onto the board as one's own, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi#Drops">it is not legal to place down a pawn that gives immediate checkmate</a>. It's still perfectly legal to drop a pawn that gives check though (and to check/mate normally with a pawn), so this a much less severe restriction than what your question asks about. But this is a case in which the pawns are singled out, because any other piece can be dropped to give an immediate checkmate.</p>
  
  <p>Since Shogi and chess are both believed to derive from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga">Chaturanga</a>, perhaps there is indeed some historical variant in which pawns weren't allowed to check at all; but I'm just speculating at the moment.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T00:50:04.903Z
Answers.Text: This is correct regarding Shogi's 'pawn drops.'
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T00:53:17.783Z
Answers.Text: @TonyEnnis, do you know a rationale behind the rule that one can't checkmate with a dropped pawn specifically?
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T01:02:48.397Z
Answers.Text: No, I don't recall reading why this is.  Let me check my book...
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T01:10:05.017Z
Answers.Text: No, they contain no explanation of the rule. Perhaps this is no more unusual that wondering why a knight moves like an "L" - it just does.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T01:16:55.663Z
Answers.Text: @TonyEnnis, perhaps so. I did some light googling and couldn't find an underlying reason either. Thanks.
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-20T00:20:22.927Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-07-20T00:20:22.927Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ETD
Answers.Body: <p>I have never heard this before... A pawn can check and also mate.</p>
  
  <p><a href="http://chess.about.com/od/tipsforbeginners/ss/BasicCheckmates_7.htm">http://chess.about.com/od/tipsforbeginners/ss/BasicCheckmates_7.htm</a></p>
  
  <p><a href="http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/beutiful-pawn-mate">http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/beutiful-pawn-mate</a></p>
  
  <p><a href="http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/solid-pawn-mate">http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/solid-pawn-mate</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-19T23:46:30.393Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-07-19T23:46:30.393Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Robert Kaucher
Answers.Body: <p>A particularly unpleasant pawn check happened to me in a tournament during the endgame. My opponent's pawn took my recently advanced g-pawn en passant delivering check to my king and attacking my rook. The pawn was defended.</p>
  
  <p>I'd completely forgotten about en passant so hadn't spotted this winning move.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-26T23:25:26.167Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-21T17:24:43.143Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-21T17:24:43.143Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: AndyM
Answers.Body: <p>Not only can a pawn put a king in check, it can also checkmate him as can be seen in several famous games. There's an old saying, that "A cat may look at a king, but a pawn can checkmate him." Here's a position demonstrating just such a check.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN "8/1k6/p1PK2pp/6n1/8/P4B2/1P6/8 w - - 0 1"]
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2018-04-18T03:03:45.707Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-09-21T17:23:17.553Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-09-21T17:23:17.553Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: CConero
Body: <p>I am only an amateur player, but have been playing for many years. Every now and then I come across people who are adamant that a pawn cannot put a king into check.</p>
  
  <p>The last person who I discussed this with was a high school student who played school competitions and pretty much convinced me. So much so that I have now convinced my father, who taught me how to play over 20 years ago that a pawn cannot check or take another piece to put the king into check.</p>
  
  <p>I've just done a Google search to clarify, although most pages say a pawn can put a king into check it has so many results that it has made me curious:</p>
  
  <p>Where did the idea that a king cannot be put in check by a pawn come from?</p>
  
  <p>Are there are competitions / set of rules / types of games where this rule is enforced in the modern game?</p>
  
  <p>Further question, can a pawn also be moved to put a king into checkmate?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2016-10-20T03:26:18.690Z
Comments.Text: Unrelated but I think I'd love a version that would allow a pawn to promote to a second king. That'd make pawns even more valuable and would completely change strategic planning.
Comments.UserDisplayName: De Shan Baptiste
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-04-18T05:57:11.553Z
Comments.Text: Pawn checks are somewhat rare (but of course legal). Perhaps this helper people to make up their own rules.
Comments.UserDisplayName: user1583209
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2018-12-13T16:20:46.920Z
Comments.Text: If this were not the case, it would then be possible to capture the king outright.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Joshua
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-03-02T10:41:52.357Z
Comments.Text: @user1583209 : they are *extremely* common in endgames, especially King+pawn versus King, and if they were changed, then the entire game of chess would change, because most of high-level play is about forcing a winnable endgame.
Comments.UserDisplayName: vsz
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-07-19T23:50:53.120Z
Comments.Text: A pawn can most certainly check the opposing king. As to where the mythical opposite belief came from, I wonder whether there might have been some chess variant in which this wasn't the case.
Comments.UserDisplayName: ETD
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-07-19T23:53:30.510Z
Comments.Text: I once had a friend from Ukraine who said that the way she was taught if a king touched a square on his opponent's back rank he earned a replacement pawn on his second rank, same file. So if the white king made it to e8 he would get a pawn on e2.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Robert Kaucher
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-07-19T23:59:15.590Z
Comments.Text: I wouldn't be surprised if the origin of this idea is just "Hmm... that move puts me in trouble... better make up a rule."
Comments.UserDisplayName: David Spencer
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2012-07-25T12:50:24.340Z
Comments.Text: As everyone else has said, yes, pawns can definitely check or checkmate the king.  Perhaps the confusion comes from the fact that they are the only pieces to threaten different squares than they can move to.  Also, to answer your penultimate question, I've never heard of a modern chess tournament which worked differently, the rules are fairly standard and unambiguous these days.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Daniel B
Tags: <rules><pawns><check>
Title: Can a pawn put a king in check?
ThreadText: # Can a pawn put a king in check?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-07-19)
  
  I am only an amateur player, but have been playing for many years. Every now and then I come across people who are adamant that a pawn cannot put a king into check.
  
  The last person who I discussed this with was a high school student who played school competitions and pretty much convinced me. So much so that I have now convinced my father, who taught me how to play over 20 years ago that a pawn cannot check or take another piece to put the king into check.
  
  I've just done a Google search to clarify, although most pages say a pawn can put a king into check it has so many results that it has made me curious:
  
  Where did the idea that a king cannot be put in check by a pawn come from?
  
  Are there are competitions / set of rules / types of games where this rule is enforced in the modern game?
  
  Further question, can a pawn also be moved to put a king into checkmate?
  
  **Tags:** rules, pawns, check
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_5**: A pawn can most certainly check the opposing king. As to where the mythical opposite belief came from, I wonder whether there might have been some chess variant in which this wasn't the case.  
  > **username_6**: I once had a friend from Ukraine who said that the way she was taught if a king touched a square on his opponent's back rank he earned a replacement pawn on his second rank, same file. So if the white king made it to e8 he would get a pawn on e2.  
  > **username_7**: I wouldn't be surprised if the origin of this idea is just "Hmm... that move puts me in trouble... better make up a rule."  
  > **username_8**: As everyone else has said, yes, pawns can definitely check or checkmate the king.  Perhaps the confusion comes from the fact that they are the only pieces to threaten different squares than they can move to.  Also, to answer your penultimate question, I've never heard of a modern chess tournament which worked differently, the rules are fairly standard and unambiguous these days.  
  > **username_1**: Unrelated but I think I'd love a version that would allow a pawn to promote to a second king. That'd make pawns even more valuable and would completely change strategic planning.  
  > **username_2**: Pawn checks are somewhat rare (but of course legal). Perhaps this helper people to make up their own rules.  
  > **username_3**: If this were not the case, it would then be possible to capture the king outright.  
  > **username_4**: @username_2 : they are *extremely* common in endgames, especially King+pawn versus King, and if they were changed, then the entire game of chess would change, because most of high-level play is about forcing a winnable endgame.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2012-07-20. Score: 20
  
  Here's a preliminary answer to where such a belief about chess pawns could possibly have come from. In the Japanese variant Shogi, in which an opponent's captured pieces may be placed onto the board as one's own, [it is not legal to place down a pawn that gives immediate checkmate](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi#Drops). It's still perfectly legal to drop a pawn that gives check though (and to check/mate normally with a pawn), so this a much less severe restriction than what your question asks about. But this is a case in which the pawns are singled out, because any other piece can be dropped to give an immediate checkmate.
  
  Since Shogi and chess are both believed to derive from [Chaturanga](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga), perhaps there is indeed some historical variant in which pawns weren't allowed to check at all; but I'm just speculating at the moment.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_9**: This is correct regarding Shogi's 'pawn drops.'  
  > **username_5**: @TonyEnnis, do you know a rationale behind the rule that one can't checkmate with a dropped pawn specifically?  
  > **username_9**: No, I don't recall reading why this is.  Let me check my book...  
  > **username_9**: No, they contain no explanation of the rule. Perhaps this is no more unusual that wondering why a knight moves like an "L" - it just does.  
  > **username_5**: @TonyEnnis, perhaps so. I did some light googling and couldn't find an underlying reason either. Thanks.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2012-07-19. Score: 15
  
  I have never heard this before... A pawn can check and also mate.
  
  <http://chess.about.com/od/tipsforbeginners/ss/BasicCheckmates_7.htm>
  
  <http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/beutiful-pawn-mate>
  
  <http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/solid-pawn-mate>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_10 on 2012-07-26. Score: 8
  
  A particularly unpleasant pawn check happened to me in a tournament during the endgame. My opponent's pawn took my recently advanced g-pawn en passant delivering check to my king and attacking my rook. The pawn was defended.
  
  I'd completely forgotten about en passant so hadn't spotted this winning move.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_11 on 2018-04-18. Score: 3
  
  Not only can a pawn put a king in check, it can also checkmate him as can be seen in several famous games. There's an old saying, that "A cat may look at a king, but a pawn can checkmate him." Here's a position demonstrating just such a check.
  [FEN "8/1k6/p1PK2pp/6n1/8/P4B2/1P6/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  
  ---
  
  