Answers.Body: <p>"How to Think Ahead In Chess" by I.A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld was published in 1951. For white it covers the Stonewall attack. For black its the Sicilian dragon and the Lasker variation of the Queens gambit declined.  An odd combination of openings.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-14T07:52:25.040Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-14T07:52:25.040Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: CWallach
Answers.Body: <p>In 1561 Ruy Lopez (pronounced Rue-y Lopeth) de Segura (1530-1580) wrote Libro de la invencion liberal y arte del juego del Axedrez, por Ruy-Lopez de Sigura, clerigo, vezino dela villa Cafra. He wrote the book in response to Damiano's book.  It contains 66 games.  In 1584, his book was translated into Italian by Gio. Dominico Tarsia and printed at Venice by Cornelius Arrivabene.  In 1655, it was translated into French and published at Brussels.</p>
  
  <p><a href="http://billwall.phpwebhosting.com/articles/oldtexts.htm" rel="noreferrer">http://billwall.phpwebhosting.com/articles/oldtexts.htm</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-15T21:44:13.540Z
Answers.Text: @ChessStudent, This book was supposed to offer a deep analysis of the Ruy Lopez.  This book is considered to be an opening repertoire book.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mike Jones
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-14T10:59:49.187Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-14T10:59:49.187Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mike Jones
Answers.Body: <p>This might be the first one: <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Opening-Repertoire-Attacking-Player-Chess/dp/0713431377" rel="nofollow noreferrer">"Opening Repertoire for the Attacking Player"</a> by David Levy and GM Raymond Keene. It was first published in 1976.</p>
  
  <p>Here is another in a similar format: <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0890580200" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">"The Chess Opening for You: A Complete System for White and Black"</a>. It was first published in 1975.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:37:21.517Z
Answers.Text: One was British and not readily available in US.  The other would have come after some very basic Reinfeld books if that is what you call an opening repertoire book.   I still think the answer to the OP is that the first one wa probably a few hundred years ago but we just don't usually hear about the book as it would have nothing but historical value now.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:39:07.677Z
Answers.Text: Both of those books were readily available here. Both Batsford and RHM books were VERY popular then. I had dozens of them.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:39:34.210Z
Answers.Text: Maybe where you lived.  I had a hard time finding anything on chess.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:40:05.503Z
Answers.Text: Well, I live in the U.S. At my peak, I had 1800 chess books.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:42:10.513Z
Answers.Text: I lived in the US too.  In the 50s I only had a handful of books.  And they were hard to find where I lived.  If you were in NYC it might have been easier.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:44:02.890Z
Answers.Text: But we are not talking about the 1950's. Back then, I got all my books at tournaments, and there was a good selection. Batsford was THE most highly regarded publisher during that time. RHM came alone, and put out some great material too, a lot of it by world champions.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:46:07.740Z
Answers.Text: I only got to a few local tournaments.  No books for sale.  Batsford may have been good but I never saw those where I could get them.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:11:03.480Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-13T22:11:03.480Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>Practical Chess Openings had openings in the 50s &amp; 60s like Modern Chess Openings had later, and others have now.</p>
  
  <p>I suspect there were some opening books that go back a lot further but they would have been more limited. </p>
  
  <p>I also recall a few, not many, books that specialised in a given opening.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T21:59:35.867Z
Answers.Text: "Modern Chess Openings" and "Practical Chess Openings".
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:01:17.597Z
Answers.Text: @yobamamama Those are exactly the books he was not looking for. He is looking for something like the first books that laid out a suggest set of material that you study and memorize. A preset repertoire.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:02:06.043Z
Answers.Text: And I noted there were others but they were very rare back then.  Sorry my memory does not recall every chess book I read 50 some years ago.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T23:07:48.240Z
Answers.Text: @RewanDemontay, you are welcome.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T21:34:17.623Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-14T17:09:07.143Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-14T17:09:07.143Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.Body: <p>I recall reading My System by Nimzovich.  That must have predated the 1970ish books noted.  Assuming repertoire means what it seems to mean otherwise PCO would have been earlier than 1970ish. </p>
  
  <p>It would appear to have been a series of booklets later put into the form of a single book circa 1930s. </p>
  
  <p>I still suspect there were earlier books from Italy and europe. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-13T22:45:02.423Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-13T23:33:06.990Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-13T23:33:06.990Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.Body: <p><strong>1939:</strong> <em>White to Play and Win</em> by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaver_W._Adams" rel="noreferrer">Weaver Adams</a>. Adams believed that 1.P-K4 (1.e4) wins by force. In this book he presents his recommendations for White against the various Black defenses. For example, against 1...e5 he recommended the Bishop's Opening 2.Bc4. He continued to revise his system and write more books, e.g., he switched from 2.Bc4 to 2.Nc3 in his 1946 book <em>Simple Chess</em>.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-14T14:56:13.590Z
Answers.Text: +1 Ahh, I forgot about him. Very good answer.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-14T19:17:48.993Z
Answers.Text: His favorite was the Vienna Game.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-14T11:18:40.937Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-14T11:18:40.937Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: bof
Body: <p>As title above states, what was/were the first "Opening Repertoire" book/s? I remember that opening books of the 1970s and early 1980s weren't actually repertoires for White or Black, but treatises on the various openings and defences. Now the concept of "opening repertoire" is very popular. </p>
  
Tags: <opening><books><repertoire>
Title: What was the first "Opening Repertoire" book?
ThreadText: # What was the first "Opening Repertoire" book?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-12-13)
  
  As title above states, what was/were the first "Opening Repertoire" book/s? I remember that opening books of the 1970s and early 1980s weren't actually repertoires for White or Black, but treatises on the various openings and defences. Now the concept of "opening repertoire" is very popular.
  
  **Tags:** opening, books, repertoire
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 6 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-12-14. Score: 8 | Accepted answer
  
  **1939:** *White to Play and Win* by [Weaver Adams](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaver_W._Adams). Adams believed that 1.P-K4 (1.e4) wins by force. In this book he presents his recommendations for White against the various Black defenses. For example, against 1...e5 he recommended the Bishop's Opening 2.Bc4. He continued to revise his system and write more books, e.g., he switched from 2.Bc4 to 2.Nc3 in his 1946 book *Simple Chess*.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: +1 Ahh, I forgot about him. Very good answer.  
  > **username_3**: His favorite was the Vienna Game.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-12-14. Score: 5
  
  "How to Think Ahead In Chess" by I.A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld was published in 1951. For white it covers the Stonewall attack. For black its the Sicilian dragon and the Lasker variation of the Queens gambit declined. An odd combination of openings.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-12-14. Score: 5
  
  In 1561 Ruy Lopez (pronounced Rue-y Lopeth) de Segura (1530-1580) wrote Libro de la invencion liberal y arte del juego del Axedrez, por Ruy-Lopez de Sigura, clerigo, vezino dela villa Cafra. He wrote the book in response to Damiano's book. It contains 66 games. In 1584, his book was translated into Italian by Gio. Dominico Tarsia and printed at Venice by Cornelius Arrivabene. In 1655, it was translated into French and published at Brussels.
  
  <http://billwall.phpwebhosting.com/articles/oldtexts.htm>
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: @ChessStudent, This book was supposed to offer a deep analysis of the Ruy Lopez.  This book is considered to be an opening repertoire book.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-12-13. Score: 2
  
  This might be the first one: ["Opening Repertoire for the Attacking Player"](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Opening-Repertoire-Attacking-Player-Chess/dp/0713431377) by David Levy and GM Raymond Keene. It was first published in 1976.
  
  Here is another in a similar format: ["The Chess Opening for You: A Complete System for White and Black"](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0890580200). It was first published in 1975.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: One was British and not readily available in US.  The other would have come after some very basic Reinfeld books if that is what you call an opening repertoire book.   I still think the answer to the OP is that the first one wa probably a few hundred years ago but we just don't usually hear about the book as it would have nothing but historical value now.  
  > **username_3**: Both of those books were readily available here. Both Batsford and RHM books were VERY popular then. I had dozens of them.  
  > **username_4**: Maybe where you lived.  I had a hard time finding anything on chess.  
  > **username_3**: Well, I live in the U.S. At my peak, I had 1800 chess books.  
  > **username_4**: I lived in the US too.  In the 50s I only had a handful of books.  And they were hard to find where I lived.  If you were in NYC it might have been easier.  
  > **username_3**: But we are not talking about the 1950's. Back then, I got all my books at tournaments, and there was a good selection. Batsford was THE most highly regarded publisher during that time. RHM came alone, and put out some great material too, a lot of it by world champions.  
  > **username_4**: I only got to a few local tournaments.  No books for sale.  Batsford may have been good but I never saw those where I could get them.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-12-13. Score: 1
  
  Practical Chess Openings had openings in the 50s & 60s like Modern Chess Openings had later, and others have now.
  
  I suspect there were some opening books that go back a lot further but they would have been more limited.
  
  I also recall a few, not many, books that specialised in a given opening.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: "Modern Chess Openings" and "Practical Chess Openings".  
  > **username_3**: @username_4 Those are exactly the books he was not looking for. He is looking for something like the first books that laid out a suggest set of material that you study and memorize. A preset repertoire.  
  > **username_4**: And I noted there were others but they were very rare back then.  Sorry my memory does not recall every chess book I read 50 some years ago.  
  > **username_3**: @RewanDemontay, you are welcome.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-12-13. Score: 1
  
  I recall reading My System by Nimzovich. That must have predated the 1970ish books noted. Assuming repertoire means what it seems to mean otherwise PCO would have been earlier than 1970ish.
  
  It would appear to have been a series of booklets later put into the form of a single book circa 1930s.
  
  I still suspect there were earlier books from Italy and europe.
  
  
  ---
  
  