Answers.Body: <p>It's easy to come up with positions where promoting to knight leads to insufficient material but promoting to bishop doesn't. This one, for instance:</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;N5q1/7P/8/8/8/7K/8/7k w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-15T08:24:45.997Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-02-16T06:27:36.757Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2021-02-16T06:27:36.757Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: bof
Answers.Body: <p>Various problems requiring bishop promotions. White is to play in all cases.</p>
  <pre><code>1) Economy record for a study (also correct as #5!)
  2) EDIT: another five-piece study (#14!)
  3) Earlier cooked study from 1856 for comparison (which works as #9)
  4) Economy record using 50 Move rule
  5) Black in time-trouble (using special FIDE &quot;half-dead rule&quot;, 6.9)
  6) White in time-trouble (ditto)
  </code></pre>
  <p>First then, here is the economy record:</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;1) Win - end of study by Klinkov, 1966&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;3n3k/1P5P/7K/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;] 
  
  1. b8=B! Nf7+! 2.Kg6! Nd6! 3. Bc7! Nf5 4.Be5+! Ng7! 5. Bxg7#!
  </code></pre>
  <p>Shifting all units one column to the left gives 2n3k1/P5P1/6K1/8/8/8/8/8: a sound study, with mate in 14, but alas no dual-free line.</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;2) Win - part of study by Halberstadt, 1952&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;7k/4KP2/6Bn/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;] 
  
  1. f8=B! Ng4 2. Bf5! Ne5 3. Kf6!
  </code></pre>
  <p>This leads to mate in 14.</p>
  <p>By way of comparison, here is the only comparable prior art with less than 6 pieces in either of the mega-databases PDB or WinChloe. As a study it is cooked, because with N promotion there is #28. So to make it sound, it can be regarded as #9, but when it's down to KBBvK, there is no dual-free line.</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;3) Win - Luigi Centurini, La Regence 1856 COOKED&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;2k5/8/2K1P3/b7/8/6B1/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;] 
  
  1. e7! Bd8 2. e8=B! Bc7! 3. Bd7+! Kb8 4. Bxc7+ etc.
  </code></pre>
  <p>Let me show some other off-the-wall examples...</p>
  <p>Here's one based on the 50-move rule (which must be specified in the stip, since by default it does not apply for orthodox studies).</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;4) Win (with 50 Move Rule) - Original, 2021&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;7N/pP6/k7/8/K7/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <ol>
  <li>b8=B! White mates in 35.</li>
  </ol>
  <p>On the other hand:</p>
  <ol>
  <li>b8=N? This is a &quot;cursed win&quot;: White could in principle mate in 104, but a draw intervenes under the 50-move rule as Black can delay the first pawn move or capture until White's 54th move.</li>
  </ol>
  <p>Another example uses the FIDE “half-dead rule&quot; Article 6.9 concerning the clock. Basically if a player times out (normally a loss) the game is drawn if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves.</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;5) Best play under FIDE rules (Black in extreme time trouble) - Version 2023&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;6rk/7P/6pK/p5Pb/6p1/p5P1/P7/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p><strong>Explanation</strong></p>
  <p>1.hxg8=Q/R+? (dp) Kxg8=
  1.hxg8=N? a4 (dp) 2.Ne7,Nf6
  So in all these cases no checkmate is possible, and the game immediately ends in a draw before Black has to reply.</p>
  <p>On the other hand, after 1. hxg8=B! then game does <em>not</em> end <em>immediately</em>, because at least in principle there is the alternative lifeline 1... a4 2.Bb3 axb3 3.axb3 &amp; e.g. a2 4.b4 a1=Q 5.b5 Qg7# and although Black wins, it takes 5 moves, there are checkmates around for either side. To seize the draw though, Black should play 1... Kxg8=, <em>but</em> has to execute this before the quivering flag falls.</p>
  <p>And here's the final example, with <em>White</em> in time trouble:</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;6) Draw under FIDE rules (White in extreme time trouble) - Original, 2023&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;7Q/4q1P1/5k1K/5r2/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p><strong>Explanation</strong></p>
  <p>White can win after 1.Qf8+ or 1.g8=X+, but in only one case is the checkmate certain: 1.g8=B+ Qg7+ 2.Qxg7#, so by playing this key, White locks in at least a half point if he times out before the next move.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-18T02:58:36.643Z
Answers.Text: The B-promotion in "Otto Dehler, after Luigi Centurini" 
  (a century old this year!) even shows up on occasion in analysis of
  Bishop endings from actual play.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Noam D. Elkies
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-18T05:11:29.397Z
Answers.Text: @Noam: apart from reflection, I suspect it's the only such KBPvKB position with P not yet on 7th rank. Or do you have others?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-19T00:24:20.433Z
Answers.Text: It also works with the pawn on a few other files, and the Bishops
  elsewhere on the diagonal.  In your diagram, bBc7 almost works, but besides 
  1 e7 Bd8! 2 e8B! White also wins with 1 Bg5, taking a few moves longer.
  Likewise it's tempting to retract 0 e5-e6+ Kb8-c8, but 0 Kd7 would also win
  two moves later.  However, Kc5 Bh1 Pd5 / Ka8 Ba6 works: 
  1 Kb6 Bb7 2 d6! Kb8! 3 d7! Bc8 4 d8B! Bb7 5 Bc7+! Kc8 6 Bxb7+ and mates in 15,
  with each White move unique and each Black move offering the longest resistance
  (up to a tie with 4 . . . Ba6).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Noam D. Elkies
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-29T02:17:00.390Z
Answers.Text: In example 2, e8=N also wins (https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=2kb4/4P3/2K5/8/8/6B1/8/8_w_-_-_0_1)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Lucenaposition
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-29T04:36:35.283Z
Answers.Text: @Lucenaposition yes as a study (which was Centurini's stipulation) this is cooked. I quoted it as a mate in 9, because with N promotion it's mate in 28. I will make this clearer in my comment, and also in https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1395801 where I found this one. Thank you
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-15T05:37:21.290Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2024-11-22T04:07:15.583Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2024-11-22T04:07:15.583Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.Body: <p>Another addendum. <em>Very</em> strictly speaking, <em>none</em> of the positions (except the &quot;dead&quot; utilization by Laska) fulfil the specifications of the OP, since promotion should be the <em>only</em> move. But this is still easy, not even a capture involved:</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;k2b4/P5P1/Kp6/1P6/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 0&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p><code>1.g8B!</code> and mate in the next move; <code>1.g8R? =</code>, <code>1.g8N? Bg5! 2.Kxb6 Be3+ 3.Ka6 Bxa7 =</code></p>
  <p>Addendum to the addendum. As promised above, a study where both sides underpromote. (But Black's is only a joke, the piece is captured immediately.) Not by Troitzki (I conflated that with his study where <em>five</em> same-field-color bishops win) but by a world champion:</p>
  <p>V. Smyslov, Pravda 1976</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/8/5P2/8/2k2p1p/2B1p2P/6P1/2b2K2 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. f7 Ba3 2. Bg7 f3 3. gxf3 Kd3 4. f8=B e2+ 5. Kf2 e1=B+ 6. Kxe1 Ke3 7. f4 Kxf4 8. Kf2 Bc1 9. Bh6+ 1-0
  </code></pre>
  <p><code>4. f8Q? e2+ 5. Kf2 Bc5+ 6. Qxc5 e1Q+ 7. Kxe1 =</code> is the reason.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T16:04:39.273Z
Answers.Text: But he clarifies: "3. Where 'only move' means either, a move that draws while all other moves lose, or, a move that wins while all other moves draw or lose." Thus technically the op *did* ask for positions where multiple moves, besides a promotion, are legal - it just has to make at least 1/2 point difference. I agree however that point 1. then makes little sense to add and is to say the least confusing / inconsistent. Perhaps he meant in point 3 specifically the bishop promotion as 'only move', but that phrase was not used in point 2.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carlo Wood
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T16:20:36.743Z
Answers.Text: *Hauke puts exclamation mark after Bg5!* -- meanwhile, stockfish in Troll Mode: 1. g8=N? Be7 2. Kxb6 Bh4 3. Nh6 Be1 4. Nf5 Bc3 5. Nd6 Bd4+ 6. Ka6 Bxa7 7. Nb7 Kb8 8. b6 Ka8 9. bxa7
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carlo Wood
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-03T06:31:54.650Z
Answers.Text: @CarloWood: I rather used Syzygy :-) If you use Nunn convention, so "!" means "only move", you are entirely correct - only 1...Bc7 throws the draw. "!" I rather meant as "take this, White, now the draw is obvious!"
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-25T13:30:14.253Z
Answers.Text: @HaukeReddmann it should be called the "Wunn" convention :-) (!)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T06:50:57.033Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-08-25T08:25:48.147Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-08-25T08:25:48.147Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.Body: <p>This answer brings two additions to the already existing answers:</p>
  <hr />
  <p>One example to demonstrate another motivation for a bishop promotion : <strong>self-stalemating</strong>.</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;1K6/PP1k4/2r5/1n6/r7/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>1.Ka8? loses to 1...Rxa7</p>
  <p>1.a8Q/R/N loses to 1...Re6 or 1...Rh4</p>
  <p>But 1.a8B! leads to stalemate on the next move unless Black plays 1...Rxa8 2.ba8Q which is also a draw, or commits suicide with 1...Rc8??.</p>
  <hr />
  <p><strong>Some examples from real games</strong></p>
  <p><a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1287069&amp;kpage=6#reply132" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Tomic - Winzbeck</a> , 1993</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/MNEVblpB.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/MNEVblpB.png" alt="Tomic - Winzbeck" /></a></p>
  <p>43.Rd8! Rxd8 44.cd8:B!</p>
  <p><a href="https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1253800" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Reshko - Kaminsky</a> , 1972</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/k90aOhb8.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/k90aOhb8.png" alt="Reshko - Kaminsky" /></a></p>
  <p>61.a8Q? or 61.a8R? is met by 61...Qf7! with an immediate draw by stalemate,</p>
  <p>61.a8N?! Qa7 might or might not win,</p>
  <p>but 61.a8B! won easily in the game.</p>
  <p>Please also check Boniface - Pugh and the final position of Kholmov - Ehlvest from this <a href="https://timkr.home.xs4all.nl/chess2/minor.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">page</a> on Tim Krabbé's great blog.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-31T05:14:05.507Z
Answers.Text: Very cool idea but I don't think this example is quite right, because after a8=B black has a spectacular windmill on e6. It's actually equally amazing how black wins this: a8=Q Ke6! giving white a move. Kf8➔ Ke7+ Kg8➔ Re6! again giving white a move. Kf8➔ Rh6+ Kg8 Rh8#.
Answers.UserDisplayName: cyqsimon
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-31T05:15:08.543Z
Answers.Text: I think this is the first instance I've seen of a windmill employed not to win material but to manoeuvre pieces. Beautiful tactic.
Answers.UserDisplayName: cyqsimon
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-31T06:29:37.537Z
Answers.Text: @cyqsimon well spotted, I have replaced Bf5 by a Rc6.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-05-29T12:18:14.293Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2024-06-04T06:16:09.210Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2024-06-04T06:16:09.210Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Evargalo
Answers.Body: <pre><code>[fen &quot;3n3k/1P2N3/6K1/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. b8=B Nc6 2. Nxc6 Kg8 3. Bd6 Kh8 4. Bf4 Kg8 5. Bh6 Kh8 6. Bg7+ Kg8 7. Ne7#
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-23T23:13:30.013Z
Answers.Text: 4. Bf8 also leads to 5. Bh6.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rewan Demontay
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-23T13:37:36.360Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-07-23T17:04:51.580Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-07-23T17:04:51.580Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Gotitinaday
Answers.Body: <p>I'm surprised that no one else has mentioned this example yet--it arose in a real game in 2022, and was widely reported at the time.  In this position, GM Johann Hjartarson played 54. e7 and eventually drew the game.  But he could have won by sacrificing his queen and then promoting to a bishop!</p>
  <pre><code>[title &quot;Hjartarson vs Andersen, Reykjavik Open 2022&quot;]
  [fen &quot;4r1k1/3R2p1/2q1P2p/5QnP/5N2/6P1/5P2/6K1 w - - 3 54&quot;]
  
  1. Qf7+ Nxf7 2. exf7+ Kh7 3. fxe8=B! (3. fxe8=Q? Qg2+ 4. Kxg2=) Qc8 (3... Qf6 4. Bg6+ Kg8 5. Ne6) (3... Qc1+ 4. Kh2 Qc5 5. Bg6+ Kg8 6. Rd8+) 4. Bg6+ Kg8 5. Re7
  </code></pre>
  <p>The engine gives many flashy winning lines for white after the bishop promotion, but perhaps the simplest way (sample lines included above) is to plant the bishop on g6 and force a rook check on the back rank, winning the queen.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-12-09T02:13:27.003Z
Answers.Text: +1 thank you. Please add further moves to show how play can go after fxe8=B
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-12-09T18:07:45.690Z
Answers.Text: @Laska I added some sample continuations.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ravi Fernando
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2024-12-08T23:52:33.610Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2024-12-09T17:55:14.837Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2024-12-09T17:55:14.837Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ravi Fernando
Answers.Body: <p>I didn't look at existing answers yet; so maybe this was already posted.
  I tried and fairly quickly came up with:</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;1r5K/2P5/8/k1N5/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>My line of thought was: if promoting to a bishop is better than promoting to a queen, then having more &quot;power&quot; must lead to stale mate. Therefore promoting to a bishop must win. Then, if you allow that promoting happens while taking a piece it is rather easy to make it the only move that wins.</p>
  <p>I'll be interested to see if there are answers that strongly divert from this idea, especially promoting without capturing a piece. But I'll first think about that myself.</p>
  <p>EDIT:</p>
  <p>After just 2 minutes or so, I came up with:</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;7K/P7/8/1N6/1N6/1p1P4/1k5p/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  <p>Here promotion is necessary because otherwise black promotes to queen with check, and promoting to rook or knight is not going to stop black from doing that, after which you just lose your promoted piece (black promotes with fork). Promoting a queen still results in a stalemate: then black also promotes to a queen and the best thing white then has is to take it, which is stalemate.</p>
  <p>Promoting to a bishop stops black from promoting and white will go on to win.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-25T07:26:40.397Z
Answers.Text: Nice. In the first one you can shift wKa1 & bKa3. It all still works as before but now White is not in check in the diagram
Answers.UserDisplayName: Laska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T14:58:42.237Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-04-02T16:09:40.280Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-04-02T16:09:40.280Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carlo Wood
Answers.Body: <p>Here are two light problems involving bishop-promotion (and rook-promotion, too, to boot).</p>
  <p>A. Kudryavtsev; Smena (Moscow), Mar 1999; PDB P1165938. #4. FEN 6B1/7P/5Pk1/8/6K1/8/8/8</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;A. Kudryavtsev #4&quot;]
  [fen &quot;6B1/7P/5Pk1/8/6K1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1.h8=B! (1.h8=R Kxf6 {and White wins at move 8}; 1.h8=N+ Kxf6 {and White wins at move 31}; 1.h8=Q? =) Kh6 2.f7 Kg6 3.f8=R (3.f8=Q/f8=B? =) Kh6 4.Rf6#
  </code></pre>
  <p>Viktor Pilipenko; Sa ogneupory, 26 Mar 1987, 190; PDB P1165936. #5. FEN 6B1/7P/6k1/4P3/6K1/8/8/8</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Viktor Pilipenko #5&quot;]
  [fen &quot;6B1/7P/6k1/4P3/6K1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1.h8=B! (1. h8=R Kg7 {and White wins at move 7}; 1. h8=N+ Kg7 {and White wins at move 10}; 1. h8=Q? =) Kh6 2.e6 Kg6 3.e7 Kh6 4.e8=R (4. e8=Q/B? =) Kg6 5.Re6#
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T06:16:40.710Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-04-02T06:24:15.707Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-04-02T06:24:15.707Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rosie F
Answers.Body: <p>There are numerous chess problems, whether a checkmating one or an endgame study, that feature certain promotions as a necessity to win. Stalemate is the long-known reason behind doing so.</p>
  <p>This problem is the first known one to use Bishop promotion, although it is a later correction. Even better, it comes with double the fun!</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Ignazio Calvi  Le Palaméde 4/1836, White Wins (Correction)&quot;]
  [FEN &quot;8/6PP/3Pn3/6b1/8/k3P3/p7/K2B4 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. g8=N! Bxe3 2. h8=B! (2. h8=Q? Nd4 3. Ne7 Nc2+ Bxc2 Bd4+ 5. Qxd4)    Nd4 3. Ne7 Bd2 4. Nd5 {And white wins!}
  </code></pre>
  <p>However, in theory, it can also be motivated by the &quot;Dead Position&quot; rule. Here is a flawed, hypothetical example.</p>
  <p>Suppose White is down to seconds on the clock. They have no queens or rooks nearby-just knights. Stopping the clock to call in the arbiter might not help really. Thus, White must promote to a bishop, luckily just before the clock runs out. Now, the game is drawn and a half point is saved!</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;8/3P4/8/8/8/7k/7b/7K w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1. d8=B
  </code></pre>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T15:58:15.567Z
Answers.Text: I can't believe that if you promote to a queen here that black can claim a win when white loses on time. Or at the very least you can promote to a queen and claim a draw because black has not winning potential.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Carlo Wood
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-04-02T16:58:44.747Z
Answers.Text: I think Carlo is right, and FIDE rule 6.9 applies: "...if a player does 
  not complete the prescribed number of moves in the allotted time, the game is lost by the player. However, the game is drawn, if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves." I don't see a helpmate available that would make black win.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian McCutchon
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-25T12:10:48.140Z
Answers.Text: For the second diagram: Black can not produce a series of move that leads to a win after the promotion to a Q. Therefore it's always at least a draw for white. It can lead to a Q win, but then it's a draw due to insufficient material. e.g. `[FEN 8/8/8/8/3b4/8/Q7/K1k5 w - - 0 1]`
Answers.UserDisplayName: IT M
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-07-27T00:53:58.173Z
Answers.Text: @Laska It's an otb hypothetical, not a problem. Read the text more carefully, please.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rewan Demontay
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-02-14T00:49:18.223Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-07-27T00:53:00.090Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2023-07-27T00:53:00.090Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rewan Demontay
Body: <p>Let me define the problem clearly so as to avoid confusion. I am trying to find a position where:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>The unique best move is a promotion move.</li>
  <li>Said move needs to be promotion to a bishop. Not a queen, not a knight, and not a rook.</li>
  <li>Where &quot;unique best move&quot; means either: a move that draws while all other moves lose, or, a move that wins while all other moves draw or lose.</li>
  </ul>
  <hr>
  <p>I have been trying to come up with such a position for more than a week now without success. The following is my thought process.</p>
  <p>AFAIK there are two main reasons for underpromoting:</p>
  <ol>
  <li>Underpromote to deliver a check/attack that a queen cannot fulfill</li>
  <li>Underpromote to avoid stalemate</li>
  </ol>
  <p>The first scenario should be irrelevant because a queen has all the moves of a bishop.</p>
  <p>For the second scenario, I thought about the fundamental cause of stalemate. Promoting to queen can draw, either due to its rook-move ability, or its bishop-move ability, or both abilities simultaneously.</p>
  <div class="s-table-container">
  <table class="s-table">
  <thead>
  <tr>
  <th style="text-align: center;">Reason for stalemate</th>
  <th style="text-align: center;">Rook move</th>
  <th style="text-align: center;">Bishop move</th>
  <th style="text-align: center;">Both</th>
  </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
  <tr>
  <td style="text-align: center;"><strong>Example FEN</strong></td>
  <td style="text-align: center;"><code>8/k1P5/2P5/K7/8/8/8/8</code></td>
  <td style="text-align: center;"><code>8/6P1/8/8/8/8/8/k1K5</code></td>
  <td style="text-align: center;"><code>8/k1P5/8/2K5/8/8/8/8</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
  <td style="text-align: center;"><strong>Solution</strong></td>
  <td style="text-align: center;">Promote to Bishop/Knight</td>
  <td style="text-align: center;">Promote to Rook/Knight</td>
  <td style="text-align: center;">Promote to Rook/Bishop/Knight</td>
  </tr>
  </tbody>
  </table>
  </div>
  <p>As you can see, there is no scenario where you <em><strong>have to</strong></em> get a bishop. Therefore I concluded that any singular reason alone cannot produce a position where promotion to bishop is the only move. In other words, there has to be other conditions in the position that prevent the choice of another piece, in particular that of the knight.</p>
  <p>One idea that came to my mind is that you might need a bishop-move to prevent something, but this idea got shot down pretty quickly because if you need to prevent something, that means the opponent is threatening a move, which means there's no stalemate.</p>
  <hr>
  <p>Currently, the only semi-plausible idea I have left is that promotion to knight leads to insufficient material, whereas promotion to bishop doesn't. However coming up with such a position is quite difficult as you can imagine (especially given the condition that it has to be the only move), so I have yet to think of one.</p>
  <hr>
  <p>I have asked this question to a few IMs and GMs on their streams to no avail (understandably so, since they still have to stream), so I am turning to StackExchange community for ideas and answers.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-02-15T09:35:49.840Z
Comments.Text: Addendum: THX to Siegfried Hornecker, he found (back) this: Alexey Troitzky, Shakhmatny Listok, 15. Januar 1925
  [[FEN F8/p3B2p/1P5P/3P4/5r2/3k4/8/6K1]], 1.b7 Rg4+ 2.Kf2 Rg8 3.d6 Kc4 4.d7 Kb5 5.d8Q Rxd8 6.Bxd8 Ka6 7.b8B. It is fun to analyze what good the second bishop is for!
Comments.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-02-15T10:09:07.840Z
Comments.Text: @HaukeReddmann yeah I really enjoyed this one. Black's best attempt is to run to g8, and white is unable to force the king out of the corner, which means the h6 pawn will never promote. However white can occupy both a3-f8 and a1-h8 diagonals with the bishops, and have a Zuzwang trick when black eventually runs out of moves with their a pawn. Kf7# is a pretty cool move.
Comments.UserDisplayName: cyqsimon
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2023-08-23T18:11:14.543Z
Comments.Text: Addendum: In "Let me ask you, do you know", an endgame classic by Karaklajic, there is even a study by Troitzky where not only White but also Black underpromotes to B (the latter to fight on with stalemate tricks) and now we have four blackfielders :-) (Can't find it offhand, lacks register badly. I add it later.)
Comments.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Tags: <pawn-promotion><composing>
Title: Position where promotion to bishop is the unique best move?
ThreadText: # Position where promotion to bishop is the unique best move?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-02-14)
  
  Let me define the problem clearly so as to avoid confusion. I am trying to find a position where:
  
  * The unique best move is a promotion move.
  * Said move needs to be promotion to a bishop. Not a queen, not a knight, and not a rook.
  * Where "unique best move" means either: a move that draws while all other moves lose, or, a move that wins while all other moves draw or lose.
  
  ---
  
  I have been trying to come up with such a position for more than a week now without success. The following is my thought process.
  
  AFAIK there are two main reasons for underpromoting:
  
  1. Underpromote to deliver a check/attack that a queen cannot fulfill
  2. Underpromote to avoid stalemate
  
  The first scenario should be irrelevant because a queen has all the moves of a bishop.
  
  For the second scenario, I thought about the fundamental cause of stalemate. Promoting to queen can draw, either due to its rook-move ability, or its bishop-move ability, or both abilities simultaneously.
  
  | Reason for stalemate | Rook move | Bishop move | Both |
  | --- | --- | --- | --- |
  | **Example FEN** | `8/k1P5/2P5/K7/8/8/8/8` | `8/6P1/8/8/8/8/8/k1K5` | `8/k1P5/8/2K5/8/8/8/8` |
  | **Solution** | Promote to Bishop/Knight | Promote to Rook/Knight | Promote to Rook/Bishop/Knight |
  
  As you can see, there is no scenario where you ***have to*** get a bishop. Therefore I concluded that any singular reason alone cannot produce a position where promotion to bishop is the only move. In other words, there has to be other conditions in the position that prevent the choice of another piece, in particular that of the knight.
  
  One idea that came to my mind is that you might need a bishop-move to prevent something, but this idea got shot down pretty quickly because if you need to prevent something, that means the opponent is threatening a move, which means there's no stalemate.
  
  ---
  
  Currently, the only semi-plausible idea I have left is that promotion to knight leads to insufficient material, whereas promotion to bishop doesn't. However coming up with such a position is quite difficult as you can imagine (especially given the condition that it has to be the only move), so I have yet to think of one.
  
  ---
  
  I have asked this question to a few IMs and GMs on their streams to no avail (understandably so, since they still have to stream), so I am turning to StackExchange community for ideas and answers.
  
  **Tags:** pawn-promotion, composing
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Addendum: THX to Siegfried Hornecker, he found (back) this: Alexey Troitzky, Shakhmatny Listok, 15. Januar 1925 [[FEN F8/p3B2p/1P5P/3P4/5r2/3k4/8/6K1]], 1.b7 Rg4+ 2.Kf2 Rg8 3.d6 Kc4 4.d7 Kb5 5.d8Q Rxd8 6.Bxd8 Ka6 7.b8B. It is fun to analyze what good the second bishop is for!  
  > **username_0**: @HaukeReddmann yeah I really enjoyed this one. Black's best attempt is to run to g8, and white is unable to force the king out of the corner, which means the h6 pawn will never promote. However white can occupy both a3-f8 and a1-h8 diagonals with the bishops, and have a Zuzwang trick when black eventually runs out of moves with their a pawn. Kf7# is a pretty cool move.  
  > **username_1**: Addendum: In "Let me ask you, do you know", an endgame classic by Karaklajic, there is even a study by Troitzky where not only White but also Black underpromotes to B (the latter to fight on with stalemate tricks) and now we have four blackfielders :-) (Can't find it offhand, lacks register badly. I add it later.)  
  
  ---
  
  ## 9 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_9 on 2021-02-14. Score: 12 | Accepted answer
  
  There are numerous chess problems, whether a checkmating one or an endgame study, that feature certain promotions as a necessity to win. Stalemate is the long-known reason behind doing so.
  This problem is the first known one to use Bishop promotion, although it is a later correction. Even better, it comes with double the fun!
  [Title "Ignazio Calvi  Le Palaméde 4/1836, White Wins (Correction)"]
  [FEN "8/6PP/3Pn3/6b1/8/k3P3/p7/K2B4 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. g8=N! Bxe3 2. h8=B! (2. h8=Q? Nd4 3. Ne7 Nc2+ Bxc2 Bd4+ 5. Qxd4)    Nd4 3. Ne7 Bd2 4. Nd5 {And white wins!}
  
  However, in theory, it can also be motivated by the "Dead Position" rule. Here is a flawed, hypothetical example.
  Suppose White is down to seconds on the clock. They have no queens or rooks nearby-just knights. Stopping the clock to call in the arbiter might not help really. Thus, White must promote to a bishop, luckily just before the clock runs out. Now, the game is drawn and a half point is saved!
  [FEN "8/3P4/8/8/8/7k/7b/7K w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. d8=B
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_6**: I can't believe that if you promote to a queen here that black can claim a win when white loses on time. Or at the very least you can promote to a queen and claim a draw because black has not winning potential.  
  > **username_12**: I think Carlo is right, and FIDE rule 6.9 applies: "...if a player does  not complete the prescribed number of moves in the allotted time, the game is lost by the player. However, the game is drawn, if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves." I don't see a helpmate available that would make black win.  
  > **username_13**: For the second diagram: Black can not produce a series of move that leads to a win after the promotion to a Q. Therefore it's always at least a draw for white. It can lead to a Q win, but then it's a draw due to insufficient material. e.g. `[FEN 8/8/8/8/3b4/8/Q7/K1k5 w - - 0 1]`  
  > **username_9**: @username_3 It's an otb hypothetical, not a problem. Read the text more carefully, please.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2021-02-15. Score: 15
  
  It's easy to come up with positions where promoting to knight leads to insufficient material but promoting to bishop doesn't. This one, for instance:
  [FEN "N5q1/7P/8/8/8/7K/8/7k w - - 0 1"]
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2021-02-15. Score: 7
  
  Various problems requiring bishop promotions. White is to play in all cases.
  1) Economy record for a study (also correct as #5!)
  2) EDIT: another five-piece study (#14!)
  3) Earlier cooked study from 1856 for comparison (which works as #9)
  4) Economy record using 50 Move rule
  5) Black in time-trouble (using special FIDE "half-dead rule", 6.9)
  6) White in time-trouble (ditto)
  
  First then, here is the economy record:
  [Title "1) Win - end of study by Klinkov, 1966"]
  [FEN "3n3k/1P5P/7K/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"] 
  
  1. b8=B! Nf7+! 2.Kg6! Nd6! 3. Bc7! Nf5 4.Be5+! Ng7! 5. Bxg7#!
  
  Shifting all units one column to the left gives 2n3k1/P5P1/6K1/8/8/8/8/8: a sound study, with mate in 14, but alas no dual-free line.
  [Title "2) Win - part of study by Halberstadt, 1952"]
  [FEN "7k/4KP2/6Bn/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"] 
  
  1. f8=B! Ng4 2. Bf5! Ne5 3. Kf6!
  
  This leads to mate in 14.
  By way of comparison, here is the only comparable prior art with less than 6 pieces in either of the mega-databases PDB or WinChloe. As a study it is cooked, because with N promotion there is #28. So to make it sound, it can be regarded as #9, but when it's down to KBBvK, there is no dual-free line.
  [Title "3) Win - Luigi Centurini, La Regence 1856 COOKED"]
  [FEN "2k5/8/2K1P3/b7/8/6B1/8/8 w - - 0 1"] 
  
  1. e7! Bd8 2. e8=B! Bc7! 3. Bd7+! Kb8 4. Bxc7+ etc.
  
  Let me show some other off-the-wall examples...
  Here's one based on the 50-move rule (which must be specified in the stip, since by default it does not apply for orthodox studies).
  [Title "4) Win (with 50 Move Rule) - Original, 2021"]
  [FEN "7N/pP6/k7/8/K7/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  
  b8=B! White mates in 35.
  
  On the other hand:
  
  b8=N? This is a "cursed win": White could in principle mate in 104, but a draw intervenes under the 50-move rule as Black can delay the first pawn move or capture until White's 54th move.
  
  Another example uses the FIDE “half-dead rule" Article 6.9 concerning the clock. Basically if a player times out (normally a loss) the game is drawn if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves.
  [Title "5) Best play under FIDE rules (Black in extreme time trouble) - Version 2023"]
  [FEN "6rk/7P/6pK/p5Pb/6p1/p5P1/P7/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  Explanation
  1.hxg8=Q/R+? (dp) Kxg8=
  1.hxg8=N? a4 (dp) 2.Ne7,Nf6
  So in all these cases no checkmate is possible, and the game immediately ends in a draw before Black has to reply.
  On the other hand, after 1. hxg8=B! then game does not end immediately, because at least in principle there is the alternative lifeline 1... a4 2.Bb3 axb3 3.axb3 & e.g. a2 4.b4 a1=Q 5.b5 Qg7# and although Black wins, it takes 5 moves, there are checkmates around for either side. To seize the draw though, Black should play 1... Kxg8=, but has to execute this before the quivering flag falls.
  And here's the final example, with White in time trouble:
  [Title "6) Draw under FIDE rules (White in extreme time trouble) - Original, 2023"]
  [FEN "7Q/4q1P1/5k1K/5r2/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  Explanation
  White can win after 1.Qf8+ or 1.g8=X+, but in only one case is the checkmate certain: 1.g8=B+ Qg7+ 2.Qxg7#, so by playing this key, White locks in at least a half point if he times out before the next move.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: The B-promotion in "Otto Dehler, after Luigi Centurini"  (a century old this year!) even shows up on occasion in analysis of Bishop endings from actual play.  
  > **username_3**: @Noam: apart from reflection, I suspect it's the only such KBPvKB position with P not yet on 7th rank. Or do you have others?  
  > **username_4**: It also works with the pawn on a few other files, and the Bishops elsewhere on the diagonal.  In your diagram, bBc7 almost works, but besides  1 e7 Bd8! 2 e8B! White also wins with 1 Bg5, taking a few moves longer. Likewise it's tempting to retract 0 e5-e6+ Kb8-c8, but 0 Kd7 would also win two moves later.  However, Kc5 Bh1 Pd5 / Ka8 Ba6 works:  1 Kb6 Bb7 2 d6! Kb8! 3 d7! Bc8 4 d8B! Bb7 5 Bc7+! Kc8 6 Bxb7+ and mates in 15, with each White move unique and each Black move offering the longest resistance (up to a tie with 4 . . . Ba6).  
  > **username_5**: In example 2, e8=N also wins (https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=2kb4/4P3/2K5/8/8/6B1/8/8_w_-_-_0_1)  
  > **username_3**: @username_5 yes as a study (which was Centurini's stipulation) this is cooked. I quoted it as a mate in 9, because with N promotion it's mate in 28. I will make this clearer in my comment, and also in https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1395801 where I found this one. Thank you  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-04-02. Score: 3
  
  Another addendum. Very strictly speaking, none of the positions (except the "dead" utilization by username_3) fulfil the specifications of the OP, since promotion should be the only move. But this is still easy, not even a capture involved:
  [FEN "k2b4/P5P1/Kp6/1P6/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 0"]
  
  1.g8B! and mate in the next move; 1.g8R? =, 1.g8N? Bg5! 2.Kxb6 Be3+ 3.Ka6 Bxa7 =
  Addendum to the addendum. As promised above, a study where both sides underpromote. (But Black's is only a joke, the piece is captured immediately.) Not by Troitzki (I conflated that with his study where five same-field-color bishops win) but by a world champion:
  V. Smyslov, Pravda 1976
  [FEN "8/8/5P2/8/2k2p1p/2B1p2P/6P1/2b2K2 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. f7 Ba3 2. Bg7 f3 3. gxf3 Kd3 4. f8=B e2+ 5. Kf2 e1=B+ 6. Kxe1 Ke3 7. f4 Kxf4 8. Kf2 Bc1 9. Bh6+ 1-0
  
  4. f8Q? e2+ 5. Kf2 Bc5+ 6. Qxc5 e1Q+ 7. Kxe1 = is the reason.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_6**: But he clarifies: "3. Where 'only move' means either, a move that draws while all other moves lose, or, a move that wins while all other moves draw or lose." Thus technically the op *did* ask for positions where multiple moves, besides a promotion, are legal - it just has to make at least 1/2 point difference. I agree however that point 1. then makes little sense to add and is to say the least confusing / inconsistent. Perhaps he meant in point 3 specifically the bishop promotion as 'only move', but that phrase was not used in point 2.  
  > **username_6**: *Hauke puts exclamation mark after Bg5!* -- meanwhile, stockfish in Troll Mode: 1. g8=N? Be7 2. Kxb6 Bh4 3. Nh6 Be1 4. Nf5 Bc3 5. Nd6 Bd4+ 6. Ka6 Bxa7 7. Nb7 Kb8 8. b6 Ka8 9. bxa7  
  > **username_1**: @CarloWood: I rather used Syzygy :-) If you use Nunn convention, so "!" means "only move", you are entirely correct - only 1...Bc7 throws the draw. "!" I rather meant as "take this, White, now the draw is obvious!"  
  > **username_3**: @HaukeReddmann it should be called the "Wunn" convention :-) (!)  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2024-05-29. Score: 3
  
  This answer brings two additions to the already existing answers:
  
  One example to demonstrate another motivation for a bishop promotion : self-stalemating.
  [FEN "1K6/PP1k4/2r5/1n6/r7/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1.Ka8? loses to 1...Rxa7
  1.a8Q/R/N loses to 1...Re6 or 1...Rh4
  But 1.a8B! leads to stalemate on the next move unless Black plays 1...Rxa8 2.ba8Q which is also a draw, or commits suicide with 1...Rc8??.
  
  Some examples from real games
  Tomic - Winzbeck , 1993
  
  43.Rd8! Rxd8 44.cd8:B!
  Reshko - Kaminsky , 1972
  
  61.a8Q? or 61.a8R? is met by 61...Qf7! with an immediate draw by stalemate,
  61.a8N?! Qa7 might or might not win,
  but 61.a8B! won easily in the game.
  Please also check Boniface - Pugh and the final position of Kholmov - Ehlvest from this page on Tim Krabbé's great blog.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Very cool idea but I don't think this example is quite right, because after a8=B black has a spectacular windmill on e6. It's actually equally amazing how black wins this: a8=Q Ke6! giving white a move. Kf8➔ Ke7+ Kg8➔ Re6! again giving white a move. Kf8➔ Rh6+ Kg8 Rh8#.  
  > **username_0**: I think this is the first instance I've seen of a windmill employed not to win material but to manoeuvre pieces. Beautiful tactic.  
  > **username_7**: @username_0 well spotted, I have replaced Bf5 by a Rc6.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2023-07-23. Score: 2
  
  [fen "3n3k/1P2N3/6K1/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1. b8=B Nc6 2. Nxc6 Kg8 3. Bd6 Kh8 4. Bf4 Kg8 5. Bh6 Kh8 6. Bg7+ Kg8 7. Ne7#
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_9**: 4. Bf8 also leads to 5. Bh6.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_10 on 2024-12-08. Score: 2
  
  I'm surprised that no one else has mentioned this example yet--it arose in a real game in 2022, and was widely reported at the time.  In this position, GM Johann Hjartarson played 54. e7 and eventually drew the game.  But he could have won by sacrificing his queen and then promoting to a bishop!
  [title "Hjartarson vs Andersen, Reykjavik Open 2022"]
  [fen "4r1k1/3R2p1/2q1P2p/5QnP/5N2/6P1/5P2/6K1 w - - 3 54"]
  
  1. Qf7+ Nxf7 2. exf7+ Kh7 3. fxe8=B! (3. fxe8=Q? Qg2+ 4. Kxg2=) Qc8 (3... Qf6 4. Bg6+ Kg8 5. Ne6) (3... Qc1+ 4. Kh2 Qc5 5. Bg6+ Kg8 6. Rd8+) 4. Bg6+ Kg8 5. Re7
  
  The engine gives many flashy winning lines for white after the bishop promotion, but perhaps the simplest way (sample lines included above) is to plant the bishop on g6 and force a rook check on the back rank, winning the queen.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: +1 thank you. Please add further moves to show how play can go after fxe8=B  
  > **username_10**: @username_3 I added some sample continuations.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2022-04-02. Score: 2
  
  I didn't look at existing answers yet; so maybe this was already posted.
  I tried and fairly quickly came up with:
  [FEN "1r5K/2P5/8/k1N5/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  My line of thought was: if promoting to a bishop is better than promoting to a queen, then having more "power" must lead to stale mate. Therefore promoting to a bishop must win. Then, if you allow that promoting happens while taking a piece it is rather easy to make it the only move that wins.
  I'll be interested to see if there are answers that strongly divert from this idea, especially promoting without capturing a piece. But I'll first think about that myself.
  EDIT:
  After just 2 minutes or so, I came up with:
  [FEN "7K/P7/8/1N6/1N6/1p1P4/1k5p/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  Here promotion is necessary because otherwise black promotes to queen with check, and promoting to rook or knight is not going to stop black from doing that, after which you just lose your promoted piece (black promotes with fork). Promoting a queen still results in a stalemate: then black also promotes to a queen and the best thing white then has is to take it, which is stalemate.
  Promoting to a bishop stops black from promoting and white will go on to win.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: Nice. In the first one you can shift wKa1 & bKa3. It all still works as before but now White is not in check in the diagram  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_11 on 2022-04-02. Score: 1
  
  Here are two light problems involving bishop-promotion (and rook-promotion, too, to boot).
  A. Kudryavtsev; Smena (Moscow), Mar 1999; PDB P1165938. #4. FEN 6B1/7P/5Pk1/8/6K1/8/8/8
  [Title "A. Kudryavtsev #4"]
  [fen "6B1/7P/5Pk1/8/6K1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1.h8=B! (1.h8=R Kxf6 {and White wins at move 8}; 1.h8=N+ Kxf6 {and White wins at move 31}; 1.h8=Q? =) Kh6 2.f7 Kg6 3.f8=R (3.f8=Q/f8=B? =) Kh6 4.Rf6#
  
  Viktor Pilipenko; Sa ogneupory, 26 Mar 1987, 190; PDB P1165936. #5. FEN 6B1/7P/6k1/4P3/6K1/8/8/8
  [Title "Viktor Pilipenko #5"]
  [fen "6B1/7P/6k1/4P3/6K1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
  
  1.h8=B! (1. h8=R Kg7 {and White wins at move 7}; 1. h8=N+ Kg7 {and White wins at move 10}; 1. h8=Q? =) Kh6 2.e6 Kg6 3.e7 Kh6 4.e8=R (4. e8=Q/B? =) Kg6 5.Re6#
  
  
  ---
  
  