Answers.Body: <p>The biggest thing that caught me was the new clock "delay" style. I had to buy a new clock to be able to use mine in a tournament, after taking a break from 2000 to 2010. My old, somewhat expensive digital clock only had "Bronstein", where you add time each move. The newer digital clocks all support the "delay" setting, where you can delay starting the timer each move until a certain number of seconds in. In standard USCF tournaments, they now require a 5 second delay. (I'm not sure when it was implemented, but I assume sometime between 2000 and 2010).</p>
  
  <p>Aside from that, there was something about allowing the new electronic pocket devices for taking down moves. This has caused some controversy, because some of the devices can run chess engines, and can be used for cheating, so TDs and players alike should be careful to note how they are being used. I personally prefer paper.</p>
  
  <p>There is also an entirely new method of calculating ratings, so forget what you knew from back then. (This isn't really a rule.)</p>
  
  <p>Sorry if this isn't comprehensive, but hopefully it is useful.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-17T14:10:41.567Z
Answers.Text: Good answer, covers all the high points.  Perhaps the most important rule changes is that a draw by insufficient losing chances cannot be claimed while using a delay clock.  The idea is that 5 seconds per move is enough time to hold a truly drawn position.  [See here](http://archive.uschess.org/tds/clockrules.php) for basically everything you need to know about clock rules.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-17T14:38:08.503Z
Answers.Text: Thanks! I guess I will need a new chess clock too. Mine is an old wind-up non-digital Jerger.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Desroska
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-17T15:01:33.443Z
Answers.Text: The good news about that is: At least some of the clocks are getting cheaper... The new one I got is nicer, has more features, and cost less than half of the one I bought in 1997 or so. (Same brand: Saitek.) It's not a chronos though--those cost about the same as they did back then.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Eve Freeman
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-05-17T13:58:45.987Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-03-03T16:11:56.347Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-03-03T16:11:56.347Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Eve Freeman
Body: <p>I have not played competitive chess since 1990 and I plan to start playing tournaments again. Are there any rule changes I need to know about?</p>
  
Tags: <rules><tournament-directors><uscf>
Title: What are any USCF tournament rule changes since 1990?
ThreadText: # What are any USCF tournament rule changes since 1990?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-05-17)
  
  I have not played competitive chess since 1990 and I plan to start playing tournaments again. Are there any rule changes I need to know about?
  
  **Tags:** rules, tournament-directors, uscf
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2012-05-17. Score: 6 | Accepted answer
  
  The biggest thing that caught me was the new clock "delay" style. I had to buy a new clock to be able to use mine in a tournament, after taking a break from 2000 to 2010. My old, somewhat expensive digital clock only had "Bronstein", where you add time each move. The newer digital clocks all support the "delay" setting, where you can delay starting the timer each move until a certain number of seconds in. In standard USCF tournaments, they now require a 5 second delay. (I'm not sure when it was implemented, but I assume sometime between 2000 and 2010).
  
  Aside from that, there was something about allowing the new electronic pocket devices for taking down moves. This has caused some controversy, because some of the devices can run chess engines, and can be used for cheating, so TDs and players alike should be careful to note how they are being used. I personally prefer paper.
  
  There is also an entirely new method of calculating ratings, so forget what you knew from back then. (This isn't really a rule.)
  
  Sorry if this isn't comprehensive, but hopefully it is useful.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: Good answer, covers all the high points.  Perhaps the most important rule changes is that a draw by insufficient losing chances cannot be claimed while using a delay clock.  The idea is that 5 seconds per move is enough time to hold a truly drawn position.  [See here](http://archive.uschess.org/tds/clockrules.php) for basically everything you need to know about clock rules.  
  > **username_0**: Thanks! I guess I will need a new chess clock too. Mine is an old wind-up non-digital Jerger.  
  > **username_1**: The good news about that is: At least some of the clocks are getting cheaper... The new one I got is nicer, has more features, and cost less than half of the one I bought in 1997 or so. (Same brand: Saitek.) It's not a chronos though--those cost about the same as they did back then.  
  
  ---
  
  