Answers.Body: <ul>
  <li><p><code>8. ... h6</code> was unprovoked. Until White threatens to double Q+B on a c1-h6 diagonal, or places the piece ag <code>g5</code>, there is no reason to weaken the Kingside. The plan calls for immediate <code>8. ... f5</code>, e.g. <code>8... f5 9. Bg5 h6 10. Bh4</code>, and it is up to Black to decide between <code>10. ... g5</code> and <code>10. ... Bf6</code>, whichever suites your style.</p>
  
  <p>Along the same lines <code>9. ... a6</code> seems off. Black shouldn't help White in opening Queenside files. If you want to secure Queenside, <code>8. ... a5</code> is in order of the day.</p></li>
  <li><p>Did you consider <code>12. ... e4</code>?</p></li>
  </ul>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-19T14:02:00.613Z
Answers.Text: Thanks @user58697. About `8. ... a5`, what would you do after `9. a3`?
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1764381
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-19T14:07:08.637Z
Answers.Text: I did consider `12. ... e4`, I thought it wasn't good.
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1764381
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-19T05:34:12.493Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-19T05:34:12.493Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: user58697
Answers.Body: <p>A few pointers, it wasnt a reversed sicilian per se, fianchettoing your dark square bishop gave you a kings indian vs English opening type position, and in such structures your knight on c6 is always going to get hit by b5, its best retreat being to the e7 square since your play is on the kingside and your likely to go g5 at some point then get in Ne7-g6 etc, in this regard, your knight on g8 should go to f6(keeping the e7 square free for the c6 knight) then later (yes you'd have to spend some tempi going Nf6-e8 or d7) play f5-f4 n g5 etc, this is one of afew ways to play that position</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-19T14:05:49.980Z
Answers.Text: Hi @Rickka, thanks for your comment. I was actually playing using the ideas of a closed sicilian since it started as a reversed sicilian. When I am white, I play this exact closed setup against the sicilian (closed sicilian). I have never seen a `d3` pawn by white in King's Indian setup.
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1764381
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-20T06:30:58.637Z
Answers.Text: Its not a kings indian by white, its the english opening Vs a kings indian setup(or as you mention a closed sicilian setup) by black, in any case, black in the kings indian plays d6, which is the equivalent of d3 played by white
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rickka
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-05-18T05:32:39.983Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-05-18T05:32:39.983Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rickka
Body: <p>I played this game in a tournament and lost.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[fen ""]
  [StartFlipped "1"]
  
  1.c4 e5 {Starting the reversed sicilian} 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 d6 6. Nf3 Nge7 7. O-O O-O 8. Rb1 h6 {Finished the Closed Sicilian setup that I want: h6, Nc6, Ne7, O-O, Bg7, g6, and the d6-e5 pawn chain. This is the exact reverse of Karpov's Closed Sicilian when he is white} 9. b4 {I always want this move by my opponent when playing the Closed Sicilian because his Knight can be a target, but I also needed to oppose his queenside plan, though I was not really sure how to do that. I was thinking that I should try to close the queenside so that I can focus on my attack on the kingside} a6 {I couldn't think of any good way to frustrate his queenside attack, so I played this move because I have seen this in some Karpov's games, but I don't really know its purpose, I just "hope" that I can close the queenside in the future with this move} 10. a4 f5 {Started to attack his unsupported Knight} 11. b5 axb5 12. axb5 Nb8 {I did not know where to put my Knight, but I was thinking that the c5 square will be a good outpost for my Knight, so I retreated to b8} 13. Qb3 Be6 {The purpose of this move is to prevent a possible discovered check} 14. Nd2 Nd7 {Preparing to post my knight to the c5 square, so my b-pawn can't be taken because of the fork threat} 15. Ba3 Rb8 16. Na4 b6 {Closing the queenside at last} 17. Nc3 f4 {Starting my attack on the kingside. My plan is to post a Knight to d4 via the f5 square, then after posting the Knight to the d4 square, I was thinking of attacking the f3 and the e2 squares} 18. Nde4 Nf5 19. Qc2 Nd4 20. Qd1 Nf6 {Vacating the d7 square for my Queen, I was also thinking about removing my opponent's light-squared Bishop to help my attack on the f3 and the e2 squares} 21. Nxf6 Qxf6 22. Nd5 Bxd5 {Now my time trouble has started. I was thinking about putting my queen to Qf7, but after that, there was nothing that I could do to remove his Knight. Then I thought that by simplifying things, I can win a pawn by playing Nc2 at move 27, yes I calculated that, but unfortunately it was a blunder.} 23. Bxd5+ Kh7 24. e3 fxe3 25. fxe3 Qxf1 26. Qxf1 Rxf1 27. Kxf1 Nc2??? {I thought I could win a pawn here that's why I started simplifying things starting from move 22, so I played this move very quick, and immediately after playing this move I realized that I already lost the game} 28. Bc1 e4 29. Bxe4 d5 30. cxd5 h5 31. Ke2 Bf8 32. Bb2 Na3 33. Rf1 Nxb5 34. Rf7+ Kg8 35. Bxg6 Ra8 36. Be5 1-0
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>I have added comments at the following moves:
  1, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, and 27<br>
  <br>
  I don't really understand how to handle the pawn structures at the queenside.<br>
  <br>
  Is there something wrong with my plans, my thinking process?<br>
  <br>
  My opponent claimed that he was winning the middle game, but I think he was wrong, I think I was winning the middle game here. Am I wrong?</p>
  
  <p>Thanks!</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-05-18T03:00:07.980Z
Comments.Text: This is a fine game between two evenly matched players.  I recommend you run the game through an engine. I did some spot checking and found both sides had chances.  You're correct in that your `Nc2` loses. Until then however it was anyone's game.  As a matter of curiosity, White missed a shot with his 36th move; `36. Rh7` ends the game.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Tony Ennis
Tags: <closed-position><english-opening>
Title: Reversed Sicilian - What's wrong with my plan?
ThreadText: # Reversed Sicilian - What's wrong with my plan?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-18)
  
  I played this game in a tournament and lost.
  [fen ""]
  [StartFlipped "1"]
  
  1.c4 e5 {Starting the reversed sicilian} 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 d6 6. Nf3 Nge7 7. O-O O-O 8. Rb1 h6 {Finished the Closed Sicilian setup that I want: h6, Nc6, Ne7, O-O, Bg7, g6, and the d6-e5 pawn chain. This is the exact reverse of Karpov's Closed Sicilian when he is white} 9. b4 {I always want this move by my opponent when playing the Closed Sicilian because his Knight can be a target, but I also needed to oppose his queenside plan, though I was not really sure how to do that. I was thinking that I should try to close the queenside so that I can focus on my attack on the kingside} a6 {I couldn't think of any good way to frustrate his queenside attack, so I played this move because I have seen this in some Karpov's games, but I don't really know its purpose, I just "hope" that I can close the queenside in the future with this move} 10. a4 f5 {Started to attack his unsupported Knight} 11. b5 axb5 12. axb5 Nb8 {I did not know where to put my Knight, but I was thinking that the c5 square will be a good outpost for my Knight, so I retreated to b8} 13. Qb3 Be6 {The purpose of this move is to prevent a possible discovered check} 14. Nd2 Nd7 {Preparing to post my knight to the c5 square, so my b-pawn can't be taken because of the fork threat} 15. Ba3 Rb8 16. Na4 b6 {Closing the queenside at last} 17. Nc3 f4 {Starting my attack on the kingside. My plan is to post a Knight to d4 via the f5 square, then after posting the Knight to the d4 square, I was thinking of attacking the f3 and the e2 squares} 18. Nde4 Nf5 19. Qc2 Nd4 20. Qd1 Nf6 {Vacating the d7 square for my Queen, I was also thinking about removing my opponent's light-squared Bishop to help my attack on the f3 and the e2 squares} 21. Nxf6 Qxf6 22. Nd5 Bxd5 {Now my time trouble has started. I was thinking about putting my queen to Qf7, but after that, there was nothing that I could do to remove his Knight. Then I thought that by simplifying things, I can win a pawn by playing Nc2 at move 27, yes I calculated that, but unfortunately it was a blunder.} 23. Bxd5+ Kh7 24. e3 fxe3 25. fxe3 Qxf1 26. Qxf1 Rxf1 27. Kxf1 Nc2??? {I thought I could win a pawn here that's why I started simplifying things starting from move 22, so I played this move very quick, and immediately after playing this move I realized that I already lost the game} 28. Bc1 e4 29. Bxe4 d5 30. cxd5 h5 31. Ke2 Bf8 32. Bb2 Na3 33. Rf1 Nxb5 34. Rf7+ Kg8 35. Bxg6 Ra8 36. Be5 1-0
  
  I have added comments at the following moves:
  1, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, and 27
  
  I don't really understand how to handle the pawn structures at the queenside.
  
  Is there something wrong with my plans, my thinking process?
  
  My opponent claimed that he was winning the middle game, but I think he was wrong, I think I was winning the middle game here. Am I wrong?
  Thanks!
  
  **Tags:** closed-position, english-opening
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: This is a fine game between two evenly matched players.  I recommend you run the game through an engine. I did some spot checking and found both sides had chances.  You're correct in that your `Nc2` loses. Until then however it was anyone's game.  As a matter of curiosity, White missed a shot with his 36th move; `36. Rh7` ends the game.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2015-05-19. Score: 3
  
  * `8. ... h6` was unprovoked. Until White threatens to double Q+B on a c1-h6 diagonal, or places the piece ag `g5`, there is no reason to weaken the Kingside. The plan calls for immediate `8. ... f5`, e.g. `8... f5 9. Bg5 h6 10. Bh4`, and it is up to Black to decide between `10. ... g5` and `10. ... Bf6`, whichever suites your style.
  
    Along the same lines `9. ... a6` seems off. Black shouldn't help White in opening Queenside files. If you want to secure Queenside, `8. ... a5` is in order of the day.
  * Did you consider `12. ... e4`?
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thanks @username_2. About `8. ... a5`, what would you do after `9. a3`?  
  > **username_0**: I did consider `12. ... e4`, I thought it wasn't good.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2015-05-18. Score: 0
  
  A few pointers, it wasnt a reversed sicilian per se, fianchettoing your dark square bishop gave you a kings indian vs English opening type position, and in such structures your knight on c6 is always going to get hit by b5, its best retreat being to the e7 square since your play is on the kingside and your likely to go g5 at some point then get in Ne7-g6 etc, in this regard, your knight on g8 should go to f6(keeping the e7 square free for the c6 knight) then later (yes you'd have to spend some tempi going Nf6-e8 or d7) play f5-f4 n g5 etc, this is one of afew ways to play that position
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Hi @username_3, thanks for your comment. I was actually playing using the ideas of a closed sicilian since it started as a reversed sicilian. When I am white, I play this exact closed setup against the sicilian (closed sicilian). I have never seen a `d3` pawn by white in King's Indian setup.  
  > **username_3**: Its not a kings indian by white, its the english opening Vs a kings indian setup(or as you mention a closed sicilian setup) by black, in any case, black in the kings indian plays d6, which is the equivalent of d3 played by white  
  
  ---
  
  