Answers.Body: <p>In general, it's preferable to recapture with the weakest piece available.  If nothing else, this means that you lose the least material in the event of a sequence of recaptures on the same square.</p>
  
  <p>In this particular case, putting the more powerful piece in that position would open up the possibility of Black forking two pieces on the next move.  By using the pawn instead, it is only a fork of a piece and a pawn, and it's relatively easy to keep the piece alive and sacrifice only the pawn - upon which the Queen is still available to recapture the piece, winning the exchange.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-01-11T13:11:42.247Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-01-11T13:11:42.247Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Chromatix
Answers.Body: <blockquote>
  <p>What would be a more in-depth explanation of why capturing with the queen is a bad idea?</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>If White retakes with the Queen he loses a piece, and stays in horrible position that is 100% lost. Below is the illustration:</p>
  <pre><code>[Title &quot;Capturing with the queen loses a piece in all lines&quot;]
  [fen &quot;r2q1rk1/pp2ppbp/2p2np1/6B1/3PP1b1/Q1n2N2/PP3PPP/3RKB1R w - - 0 1&quot;]
  
  1.Qxc3 Nxe4 2.Qe3 (2.Qd3? Bxf3 3.gxf3 (3.Qxf3 Nxg5-+) 3...Nxg5-+) 2...Bxf3 3.gxf3 (3.Qxf3? Nxg5-+) 3...Qa5+! 4.Rd2 {Or any other move, it really doesn't matter, Black stays with extra piece with Nxg5} Nxg5 5.b4 Qd5-+
  </code></pre>
  <p>To conclude:</p>
  <p>In order to defend the bishop on <code>g5</code> from the knight fork (after retaking black knight on <code>c3</code> with the queen), White must keep the queen on the <code>c1-h6</code> diagonal. This is sufficiently well demonstrated in the above diagram.</p>
  <p>Black wins by exchanging the bishop on <code>g4</code> for white knight on <code>f3</code> to loosen the defense of the white bishop on <code>g5</code> after which he wins that piece with the queen's double attack via <code>Qa5+</code>.</p>
  <p>The resulting position is just plain horrible for White, and practically 100% lost. Only drunk person would be able to squander such advantage with Black ( and they must be really really drunk). Even though at that time White was renowned GM, I think that a solid candidate master would win as Black easily in that position. That is why White decided to take with the pawn.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-06-25T15:09:06.210Z
Answers.Text: Apart from losing a piece (which is of course mroe than enough reason), bxc3 also has the advantage to support the d4 pawn and thereby strengthen the center and limit the scope of the bishop on g7. Furthermore leaving the queen on a3 you still keep an eye on the pawn on e7 which would be double attacked if the Nf6 moved.
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1583209
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-09-11T01:58:20.847Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-06-23T23:09:24.523Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-06-23T23:09:24.523Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: AlwaysLearningNewStuff
Body: <p>I watched <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M624T3PTggU" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this video - Game of the Century - Bobby Fischer vs Donald Byrne</a> in which the 13-year-old Bobby Fischer defeated Donald Byrne in an epic match.</p>
  
  <p>But I didn't really understand what happened at 12:40. The narrator says <em>"now Bryne can capture the Knight with (1) the queen or (2) the pawn."</em> Then he gives a sort of brief explanation on why Bryne chose to capture with the pawn, but I didn't understand. Here is an image of the position (White to move - Fischer was Black):</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/POOjT.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/POOjT.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
  
  <p><strong>What would be a more in-depth explanation of why recapturing with the queen is a bad idea?</strong></p>
  
Tags: <analysis><fischer><captures>
Title: Why didn't Donald Byrne capture with the queen instead of pawn (against 13-year-old Bobby Fischer in the Game of the Century)?
ThreadText: # Why didn't Donald Byrne capture with the queen instead of pawn (against 13-year-old Bobby Fischer in the Game of the Century)?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-10)
  
  I watched [this video - Game of the Century - Bobby Fischer vs Donald Byrne](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M624T3PTggU) in which the 13-year-old Bobby Fischer defeated Donald Byrne in an epic match.
  
  But I didn't really understand what happened at 12:40. The narrator says *"now Bryne can capture the Knight with (1) the queen or (2) the pawn."* Then he gives a sort of brief explanation on why Bryne chose to capture with the pawn, but I didn't understand. Here is an image of the position (White to move - Fischer was Black):
  
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/POOjT.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/POOjT.jpg)
  
  **What would be a more in-depth explanation of why recapturing with the queen is a bad idea?**
  
  **Tags:** analysis, fischer, captures
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2015-09-11. Score: 12 | Accepted answer
  
  What would be a more in-depth explanation of why capturing with the queen is a bad idea?
  
  If White retakes with the Queen he loses a piece, and stays in horrible position that is 100% lost. Below is the illustration:
  [Title "Capturing with the queen loses a piece in all lines"]
  [fen "r2q1rk1/pp2ppbp/2p2np1/6B1/3PP1b1/Q1n2N2/PP3PPP/3RKB1R w - - 0 1"]
  
  1.Qxc3 Nxe4 2.Qe3 (2.Qd3? Bxf3 3.gxf3 (3.Qxf3 Nxg5-+) 3...Nxg5-+) 2...Bxf3 3.gxf3 (3.Qxf3? Nxg5-+) 3...Qa5+! 4.Rd2 {Or any other move, it really doesn't matter, Black stays with extra piece with Nxg5} Nxg5 5.b4 Qd5-+
  
  To conclude:
  In order to defend the bishop on g5 from the knight fork (after retaking black knight on c3 with the queen), White must keep the queen on the c1-h6 diagonal. This is sufficiently well demonstrated in the above diagram.
  Black wins by exchanging the bishop on g4 for white knight on f3 to loosen the defense of the white bishop on g5 after which he wins that piece with the queen's double attack via Qa5+.
  The resulting position is just plain horrible for White, and practically 100% lost. Only drunk person would be able to squander such advantage with Black ( and they must be really really drunk). Even though at that time White was renowned GM, I think that a solid candidate master would win as Black easily in that position. That is why White decided to take with the pawn.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: Apart from losing a piece (which is of course mroe than enough reason), bxc3 also has the advantage to support the d4 pawn and thereby strengthen the center and limit the scope of the bishop on g7. Furthermore leaving the queen on a3 you still keep an eye on the pawn on e7 which would be double attacked if the Nf6 moved.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-01-11. Score: 2
  
  In general, it's preferable to recapture with the weakest piece available. If nothing else, this means that you lose the least material in the event of a sequence of recaptures on the same square.
  
  In this particular case, putting the more powerful piece in that position would open up the possibility of Black forking two pieces on the next move. By using the pawn instead, it is only a fork of a piece and a pawn, and it's relatively easy to keep the piece alive and sacrifice only the pawn - upon which the Queen is still available to recapture the piece, winning the exchange.
  
  
  ---
  
  