Answers.Body: <p>White cannot break this Great Wall of China in this position. In fact, <strong>White is slightly worse</strong> and here's why - </p>
  
  <p><strong>1. Pawn chain</strong> </p>
  
  <p>Black's pawn structure is better than White's. The pawn on <strong>e6</strong> is the base of Black's pawn chain and it is almost impossible for White to have any attack on that. True, White could possibly bring a knight to <strong>f4</strong>, but that's not happening any time soon, and even if that happens, Black can easily defend <strong>e6</strong> with one of his pieces. On the other hand, White's "virtual" pawn chain base is <strong>b2</strong> and it is far easier for Black to attack that. Black can open the b-file by playing <strong>b4</strong> and aim his rooks at <strong>b2</strong>. </p>
  
  <p><strong>2. Weaknesses</strong></p>
  
  <p>Black's only real weakness is the pawn on <strong>h5</strong>, but that is firmly protected by the bishop on <strong>g6</strong>. If White brings a knight to <strong>g3</strong> (which will take time) to double attack the pawn, Black can play <strong>Qe8</strong> and protect it. White's <strong>b2</strong> pawn is quite weak. If the <strong>b-file</strong> is opened, it will be a constant target for Black. </p>
  
  <p><strong>3. Quality of pieces</strong></p>
  
  <p>Black's worst piece is the bishop on <strong>g6</strong>. It is doing nothing at the moment and is completely blocked by its own pawns. The same can be said about White's bishop on <strong>f4</strong>. These two pieces are equally bad. So the comparison is between the knight on <strong>c6</strong> and the bishop on <strong>e7</strong>, with the knights on <strong>c3</strong> and <strong>f3</strong>. The knight on <strong>f3</strong> is not doing much. It just supports <strong>d4</strong> and plays a defensive role. Meanwhile, the knight on <strong>c6</strong> is constantly attacking d4. So the knight on <strong>c6</strong> is better than the knight on <strong>f3</strong>. The knight on <strong>c3</strong> does absolutely nothing. It's activity is completely neutralized by Black's pawns and it can be threatened any moment by <strong>b4</strong>. On the other hand, the bishop on <strong>e7</strong> is supporting the advance of <strong>b4</strong>, and is not as much hemmed in by pawns. So the bishop on <strong>e7</strong> is slightly better than the knight on <strong>c3</strong>. </p>
  
  <p>Still, it's not easy for Black to break through in this position if White plays correctly. The correct plan for White should be to march his king away from the queenside, which is soon going to come under fire from the Black rooks. White can safely do this because the center is closed and there's no way for Black to go after White's king. Thus, I recommend the following line which gives White equality- </p>
  
  <pre><code>      [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
        1. Kd2! b4 (1... Rb8 2. Ra1 b4 (2... a5 3. a4 b4 4. Nb5) 3. axb4 Rxb4 4. Rxa6
        Qc8 5. Ra2 Qb7 6. Rb1 Qb6 7. Ke3 $1) 2. axb4 Bxb4 3. Ke3 $1 
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Such king walks are quite common in closed positions. Consider this <a href="http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1269891">game</a> where the great Gary Kasparov himself playing against a strong program like Fritz took his king for a walk on the queenside instead of castling kingside, which could have been dangerous. </p>
  
  <pre><code>      [FEN "rnb2rk1/1p3ppp/1Pp2n1q/2Pp4/1B1Pp2b/PNN1P2P/1R1Q1PP1/4KB1R w K - 0 23"]
        [White "Kasparov"]
        [Black "Fritz"]
  
        1. Kd1! Be6 2. Kc1 Rd8 3. Rc2 Nbd7 4. Kb2
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Such king walks are also at times seen in closed positions that arise from the Nimzo-Indian defense. Here's a <a href="http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1057846">game</a> between two strong grandmasters Timman and Hort, where Hort played this maneuver. </p>
  
  <pre><code>    [FEN "rn1qk2r/pp3p2/3p1n1p/2pPpbp1/2P4P/2P1PPB1/P5P1/R2QKBNR b KQkq - 0 11"]
  
      1...Kd7!? 2. Bf2 Kc7
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Finally, a word of <strong>caution</strong>! Do <strong>NOT</strong> attempt king walks unless you're quite sure that your king cannot be attacked and will be safe at its destination. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T01:34:17.697Z
Answers.Text: +1 for good advice on taking a King walk. I didn't want to turn my answer into a book by including the nuances involved there, but you covered all the highlights very concisely.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Henry Keiter
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T00:11:19.967Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-04-09T03:43:11.937Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2014-04-09T03:43:11.937Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.Body: <p>This is an old question, but it brings up a very relevant chess point that no one above has touched on: <strong>In any position, allowing the area of the board you are playing in to become locked is usually positional suicide.</strong> Once your area is locked, the only hope is a sacrifice to open it...in this case, it will never come to fruition.</p>
  
  <p>The computer only gives this as slightly worse for black, but as 5 and then 10 and 15 good moves are played, the eval is going to skyrocket. This is virtually lost already since you cannot attack h5 easily (Kg7 and Rh8 if necessary).</p>
  
  <p>Your feeling that you are going to get "squashed to death" is not wrong. The best plan is probably to evacuate the Kc1 over to the locked k-side, and hope to be able to defend what is soon to be a weak queen-side. I am not optimistic since you do not have as much space to maneuver there as black does, and your pieces will be fighting for the same squares.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-10-17T13:31:25.283Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-10-17T13:31:25.283Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.Body: <p>Nxd5. allows you to flood in.You should get an easy win.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-05-23T16:45:26.323Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-05-23T16:45:26.323Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: hhuy
Answers.Body: <p>In order to make progress, one or both of you need to break through that wall. Each of you seem to have the best chances on the side near the opponent's King--you have a passer on the kingside; your opponent has a lot of pressure on your queenside. </p>
  
  <p>First, look at his threats. <code>...b5-b4</code> seems to force the issue on the queenside by kicking your Knight and threatening your a-pawn. It's likely that the b file would be at least half-opened if Black plays <code>...b4</code>. That's not great for you. However, it <em>would</em> free <code>a4</code> for your Knight, so you could maybe reposition it to <code>c5</code> at some point--that's not a bad thing, <em>if</em> you can survive the coming attack.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/3pPpPp/1ppP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Position after <code>...b5-b4</code>.</p>
  
  <hr>
  
  <p>Now let's think offensively. Where can <em>you</em> break through his wall? If you can't push pawns of your own, Knights are usually the best at this sort of thing, since they can jump to the back lines. The nature of the pawn wall means their only jumping-off spots are the spaces just in front of enemy pawns. A great spot immediately suggests itself, then: <code>f4</code>! From <code>f4</code>, a White Knight would threaten three Black pawns, as well as Black's light-squared Bishop. If you could maneuver a Knight to <code>f4</code>, then, you may be able to break through on the kingside and really put Black's king in some trouble. It's too bad you don't have a light-square Bishop to pressure <code>h5</code>.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[FEN "6k1/8/p3p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1N1P/P7/1PP5/2K5 w - - 0 1"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <hr>
  
  <p>The previous point began with "if you can't push pawns of your own". But you do have a pawn or two with moves, so let's look at those. Pushing the b-pawn isn't very appetizing, as it would likely result in a half-open c-file for Black to use to attack you. But what about <code>a3-a4</code>? It doesn't lose any material, and it somewhat mitigates the threats posed by <code>...b5-b4</code>, since Black would no longer have anything to capture. He could still take <code>...bxa4</code>, but once you recapture with <code>Nxa4</code>, he only has a half-open b file, and meanwhile your Knight is placed to advance to <code>c5</code>. Your dark-square Bishop and your Queen also have potential to slide around Black's wall via <code>d2</code>. All in all, not ideal, but not too bad either.</p>
  
  <pre><code>[StartFlipped "0"]
  [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/3pPpPp/N1pP1B1P/5N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 b - - 0 1"]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Position after <code>1.a4 bxa4 2.Nxa4</code>.</p>
  
  <hr>
  
  <p>None of the above lines are perfectly satisfactory: they're either too slow, or potentially inadequate in terms of dealing with Black's queenside threats. Thus we have a third possibility: the King is in danger and no one can come to his aid--therefore, <em>we flee to the kingside</em>.</p>
  
  <p>Because the position is so closed, and Black has no <em>immediate</em> threats against your King, you could simply play <code>Kd2</code> right away, and march your King out of harm's way, simultaneously clearing spaces for your other pieces to maneuver to the queenside if need be. I'm not going to cover this option in any further detail since <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/5241/1201">Wes already gave a good account of it in his answer</a>, so you should go read about it there.</p>
  
  <h2>Conclusion</h2>
  
  <p>Three basic plans come to mind for me. Hopefully they at least give you some insight into how I would tackle this situation, so you will be able to evaluate them on their own merits and drawbacks, and then either choose among them or come up with something altogether better!</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>As a medium-term goal, reorganize the kingside to place a Knight on <code>f4</code> to pressure all of Black's kingside forces and tie his pieces to the defense of his wall.</li>
  <li>Soon or immediately, <code>a3-a4</code> could be played to limit Black's queenside attacking potential and potentially close the position completely, or free your own pieces to end-around Black's wall.</li>
  <li>Go for a walk with your King behind your own lines, via <code>d2</code> and <code>e3</code>, to make room for your other pieces to maneuver and get your monarch out of the danger zone.</li>
  </ul>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-08T21:17:09.777Z
Answers.Text: Great in-depth analysis! I wish I could think like this on the spot.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NoName
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T03:40:21.193Z
Answers.Text: a4 is actually a bad move. Black is simply better after b4 or the much stronger Qa5! Stockfish rates it as low as -2.94 after Qa5! 
  1. a4  Qa5 2. Kd2 b4 3. Nb1 Qxa4 4. Ke1 Qa2 5. c3 a5
  6. Kf2 Qb3 7. Kg2 Rfb8 8. Rd2 a4 9. cxb4 Bxb4 10. Rc2 Ba5 11. Kh1 Qb6 12. Qe3
  Nb4 13. Re2 Nd3 14. Rgg2 Qb3 15. Rc2 Bb4 16. Rge2 Nxf4 17. Qxf4 {-2.94/24} *
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T03:49:56.100Z
Answers.Text: @Wes Perhaps. I didn't have the benefit of a computer when I was writing this analysis, but frankly it doesn't look good for White no matter what he does. I'm not convinced that `a4` makes the situation all that much worse than it already is (though again, you have more tools at your disposal than I).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Henry Keiter
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T04:03:43.960Z
Answers.Text: @HenryKeiter, yes. Qa5 was spotted by the computer, but even as a human, a4 is quite "unthinkable" to me. It's hard to explain why without giving solid lines, but it's chess intuition. Let me explain what I see. The most automatic response to a4 is b4, which drives the knight back to b1 and leaves the pawn on a4 vulnerable. Then after Nb1, Black plays Qa5 attacking a4. White plays b3 to support it and Black plays c3, trapping the knight on b1 forever. No computer understands this, and perhaps because of this rates Qa5 higher than b4. Perhaps b4, the human moves is as good as Qa5.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T04:08:07.887Z
Answers.Text: Although, now that I revisit it, maybe the position gets too closed after c3 and Black cannot find a breakthrough. Black would have to sacrifice a piece on a4, so maybe rushing with c3 is not the best idea. So maybe Qb6 followed by Na5, pressuring b3 should be better.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T04:11:40.600Z
Answers.Text: @Wes I'm having trouble seeing why White would play `Nb1` in response to `...b4`. My thought was that `Na2` provides the Knight access to `c1` or `b4`, so it shouldn't become trapped once the White King begins his exodus, and it seems to me that Black doesn't have a clear way to break through. If I'm missing something, do let me know. I *will* add a note in this answer (as it's now accepted) linking to yours, though, as I think the immediate King walk is at *least* as good a try as anything I've mentioned here, and perhaps better.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Henry Keiter
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T04:18:32.740Z
Answers.Text: I played Nb1 out of intution, but you forced me to think about why not Na2! The problem with Na2 is that the move b3 from Black comes with  a tempo on the knight. Then after cxb3 cxb3, Nc3, Qa5, the pawn on a4 is a permanent weakness. Granted Black could also play b3 after Nb1, so I guess it amounts to the same thing.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-09T04:23:02.650Z
Answers.Text: On Na2, instead of b3, computers also suggest Na5 with the idea of Qd7, attacking a4. The same is also possible after Nb1, so I suppose the two moves are equally bad for White.
Answers.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-04-08T19:07:15.420Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-04-09T04:19:35.323Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-13T12:48:53.193Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Henry Keiter
Body: <p>It's my move as White. I have no idea what to do. I feel like I'm going to get squashed to death.</p>
  <p>What would be my best move or strategy in situations like these?</p>
  <pre><code>[FEN &quot;r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1&quot;]
  </code></pre>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-04-08T18:36:05.087Z
Comments.Text: He couldn't have built the wall without some help from you! :)
Comments.UserDisplayName: NM Wesley Falcao
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-04-08T19:59:17.100Z
Comments.Text: Considering this is a game in progress, shouldn't you rather finish the game first and then explore what you could have done afterwards?
Comments.UserDisplayName: GrizzlyRawrz
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-04-08T20:23:45.760Z
Comments.Text: There is nothing you can do. You need time to get your knight to `f4` but Black is faster with `b4`. If he plays `b4` you will **lose** due to strong mating attack. You really should switch towards defense. Best regards.
Comments.UserDisplayName: AlwaysLearningNewStuff
Tags: <analysis><strategy><theory><middlegame><pawn-structure>
Title: How to break through their "Great Wall of China"
ThreadText: # How to break through their "Great Wall of China"
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2014-04-08)
  
  It's my move as White. I have no idea what to do. I feel like I'm going to get squashed to death.
  What would be my best move or strategy in situations like these?
  [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  **Tags:** analysis, strategy, theory, middlegame, pawn-structure
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: He couldn't have built the wall without some help from you! :)  
  > **username_2**: Considering this is a game in progress, shouldn't you rather finish the game first and then explore what you could have done afterwards?  
  > **username_3**: There is nothing you can do. You need time to get your knight to `f4` but Black is faster with `b4`. If he plays `b4` you will **lose** due to strong mating attack. You really should switch towards defense. Best regards.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2014-04-08. Score: 9 | Accepted answer
  
  In order to make progress, one or both of you need to break through that wall. Each of you seem to have the best chances on the side near the opponent's King--you have a passer on the kingside; your opponent has a lot of pressure on your queenside. 
  First, look at his threats. ...b5-b4 seems to force the issue on the queenside by kicking your Knight and threatening your a-pawn. It's likely that the b file would be at least half-opened if Black plays ...b4. That's not great for you. However, it would free a4 for your Knight, so you could maybe reposition it to c5 at some point--that's not a bad thing, if you can survive the coming attack.
  [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/3pPpPp/1ppP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
  Position after ...b5-b4.
  
  Now let's think offensively. Where can you break through his wall? If you can't push pawns of your own, Knights are usually the best at this sort of thing, since they can jump to the back lines. The nature of the pawn wall means their only jumping-off spots are the spaces just in front of enemy pawns. A great spot immediately suggests itself, then: f4! From f4, a White Knight would threaten three Black pawns, as well as Black's light-squared Bishop. If you could maneuver a Knight to f4, then, you may be able to break through on the kingside and really put Black's king in some trouble. It's too bad you don't have a light-square Bishop to pressure h5.
  [FEN "6k1/8/p3p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1N1P/P7/1PP5/2K5 w - - 0 1"]
  
  
  The previous point began with "if you can't push pawns of your own". But you do have a pawn or two with moves, so let's look at those. Pushing the b-pawn isn't very appetizing, as it would likely result in a half-open c-file for Black to use to attack you. But what about a3-a4? It doesn't lose any material, and it somewhat mitigates the threats posed by ...b5-b4, since Black would no longer have anything to capture. He could still take ...bxa4, but once you recapture with Nxa4, he only has a half-open b file, and meanwhile your Knight is placed to advance to c5. Your dark-square Bishop and your Queen also have potential to slide around Black's wall via d2. All in all, not ideal, but not too bad either.
  [StartFlipped "0"]
  [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/3pPpPp/N1pP1B1P/5N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 b - - 0 1"]
  
  Position after 1.a4 bxa4 2.Nxa4.
  
  None of the above lines are perfectly satisfactory: they're either too slow, or potentially inadequate in terms of dealing with Black's queenside threats. Thus we have a third possibility: the King is in danger and no one can come to his aid--therefore, we flee to the kingside.
  Because the position is so closed, and Black has no immediate threats against your King, you could simply play Kd2 right away, and march your King out of harm's way, simultaneously clearing spaces for your other pieces to maneuver to the queenside if need be. I'm not going to cover this option in any further detail since Wes already gave a good account of it in his answer, so you should go read about it there.
  Conclusion
  Three basic plans come to mind for me. Hopefully they at least give you some insight into how I would tackle this situation, so you will be able to evaluate them on their own merits and drawbacks, and then either choose among them or come up with something altogether better!
  
  As a medium-term goal, reorganize the kingside to place a Knight on f4 to pressure all of Black's kingside forces and tie his pieces to the defense of his wall.
  Soon or immediately, a3-a4 could be played to limit Black's queenside attacking potential and potentially close the position completely, or free your own pieces to end-around Black's wall.
  Go for a walk with your King behind your own lines, via d2 and e3, to make room for your other pieces to maneuver and get your monarch out of the danger zone.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Great in-depth analysis! I wish I could think like this on the spot.  
  > **username_1**: a4 is actually a bad move. Black is simply better after b4 or the much stronger Qa5! Stockfish rates it as low as -2.94 after Qa5!  1. a4  Qa5 2. Kd2 b4 3. Nb1 Qxa4 4. Ke1 Qa2 5. c3 a5 6. Kf2 Qb3 7. Kg2 Rfb8 8. Rd2 a4 9. cxb4 Bxb4 10. Rc2 Ba5 11. Kh1 Qb6 12. Qe3 Nb4 13. Re2 Nd3 14. Rgg2 Qb3 15. Rc2 Bb4 16. Rge2 Nxf4 17. Qxf4 {-2.94/24} *  
  > **username_4**: @Wes Perhaps. I didn't have the benefit of a computer when I was writing this analysis, but frankly it doesn't look good for White no matter what he does. I'm not convinced that `a4` makes the situation all that much worse than it already is (though again, you have more tools at your disposal than I).  
  > **username_1**: @HenryKeiter, yes. Qa5 was spotted by the computer, but even as a human, a4 is quite "unthinkable" to me. It's hard to explain why without giving solid lines, but it's chess intuition. Let me explain what I see. The most automatic response to a4 is b4, which drives the knight back to b1 and leaves the pawn on a4 vulnerable. Then after Nb1, Black plays Qa5 attacking a4. White plays b3 to support it and Black plays c3, trapping the knight on b1 forever. No computer understands this, and perhaps because of this rates Qa5 higher than b4. Perhaps b4, the human moves is as good as Qa5.  
  > **username_1**: Although, now that I revisit it, maybe the position gets too closed after c3 and Black cannot find a breakthrough. Black would have to sacrifice a piece on a4, so maybe rushing with c3 is not the best idea. So maybe Qb6 followed by Na5, pressuring b3 should be better.  
  > **username_4**: @Wes I'm having trouble seeing why White would play `Nb1` in response to `...b4`. My thought was that `Na2` provides the Knight access to `c1` or `b4`, so it shouldn't become trapped once the White King begins his exodus, and it seems to me that Black doesn't have a clear way to break through. If I'm missing something, do let me know. I *will* add a note in this answer (as it's now accepted) linking to yours, though, as I think the immediate King walk is at *least* as good a try as anything I've mentioned here, and perhaps better.  
  > **username_1**: I played Nb1 out of intution, but you forced me to think about why not Na2! The problem with Na2 is that the move b3 from Black comes with  a tempo on the knight. Then after cxb3 cxb3, Nc3, Qa5, the pawn on a4 is a permanent weakness. Granted Black could also play b3 after Nb1, so I guess it amounts to the same thing.  
  > **username_1**: On Na2, instead of b3, computers also suggest Na5 with the idea of Qd7, attacking a4. The same is also possible after Nb1, so I suppose the two moves are equally bad for White.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2014-04-09. Score: 8
  
  White cannot break this Great Wall of China in this position. In fact, White is slightly worse and here's why - 
  1. Pawn chain 
  Black's pawn structure is better than White's. The pawn on e6 is the base of Black's pawn chain and it is almost impossible for White to have any attack on that. True, White could possibly bring a knight to f4, but that's not happening any time soon, and even if that happens, Black can easily defend e6 with one of his pieces. On the other hand, White's "virtual" pawn chain base is b2 and it is far easier for Black to attack that. Black can open the b-file by playing b4 and aim his rooks at b2. 
  2. Weaknesses
  Black's only real weakness is the pawn on h5, but that is firmly protected by the bishop on g6. If White brings a knight to g3 (which will take time) to double attack the pawn, Black can play Qe8 and protect it. White's b2 pawn is quite weak. If the b-file is opened, it will be a constant target for Black. 
  3. Quality of pieces
  Black's worst piece is the bishop on g6. It is doing nothing at the moment and is completely blocked by its own pawns. The same can be said about White's bishop on f4. These two pieces are equally bad. So the comparison is between the knight on c6 and the bishop on e7, with the knights on c3 and f3. The knight on f3 is not doing much. It just supports d4 and plays a defensive role. Meanwhile, the knight on c6 is constantly attacking d4. So the knight on c6 is better than the knight on f3. The knight on c3 does absolutely nothing. It's activity is completely neutralized by Black's pawns and it can be threatened any moment by b4. On the other hand, the bishop on e7 is supporting the advance of b4, and is not as much hemmed in by pawns. So the bishop on e7 is slightly better than the knight on c3. 
  Still, it's not easy for Black to break through in this position if White plays correctly. The correct plan for White should be to march his king away from the queenside, which is soon going to come under fire from the Black rooks. White can safely do this because the center is closed and there's no way for Black to go after White's king. Thus, I recommend the following line which gives White equality- 
        [FEN "r2q1rk1/4b3/p1n1p1b1/1p1pPpPp/2pP1B1P/P1N2N2/1PP1Q3/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1"]
  
        1. Kd2! b4 (1... Rb8 2. Ra1 b4 (2... a5 3. a4 b4 4. Nb5) 3. axb4 Rxb4 4. Rxa6
        Qc8 5. Ra2 Qb7 6. Rb1 Qb6 7. Ke3 $1) 2. axb4 Bxb4 3. Ke3 $1 
  
  Such king walks are quite common in closed positions. Consider this game where the great Gary Kasparov himself playing against a strong program like Fritz took his king for a walk on the queenside instead of castling kingside, which could have been dangerous. 
        [FEN "rnb2rk1/1p3ppp/1Pp2n1q/2Pp4/1B1Pp2b/PNN1P2P/1R1Q1PP1/4KB1R w K - 0 23"]
        [White "Kasparov"]
        [Black "Fritz"]
  
        1. Kd1! Be6 2. Kc1 Rd8 3. Rc2 Nbd7 4. Kb2
  
  Such king walks are also at times seen in closed positions that arise from the Nimzo-Indian defense. Here's a game between two strong grandmasters Timman and Hort, where Hort played this maneuver. 
      [FEN "rn1qk2r/pp3p2/3p1n1p/2pPpbp1/2P4P/2P1PPB1/P5P1/R2QKBNR b KQkq - 0 11"]
  
      1...Kd7!? 2. Bf2 Kc7
  
  Finally, a word of caution! Do NOT attempt king walks unless you're quite sure that your king cannot be attacked and will be safe at its destination.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_4**: +1 for good advice on taking a King walk. I didn't want to turn my answer into a book by including the nuances involved there, but you covered all the highlights very concisely.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2019-10-17. Score: 2
  
  This is an old question, but it brings up a very relevant chess point that no one above has touched on: **In any position, allowing the area of the board you are playing in to become locked is usually positional suicide.** Once your area is locked, the only hope is a sacrifice to open it...in this case, it will never come to fruition.
  
  The computer only gives this as slightly worse for black, but as 5 and then 10 and 15 good moves are played, the eval is going to skyrocket. This is virtually lost already since you cannot attack h5 easily (Kg7 and Rh8 if necessary).
  
  Your feeling that you are going to get "squashed to death" is not wrong. The best plan is probably to evacuate the Kc1 over to the locked k-side, and hope to be able to defend what is soon to be a weak queen-side. I am not optimistic since you do not have as much space to maneuver there as black does, and your pieces will be fighting for the same squares.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2014-05-23. Score: -6
  
  Nxd5. allows you to flood in.You should get an easy win.
  
  
  ---
  
  