Answers.Body: <p>Those lines can be <em>any</em> opening variation; suppose player A has a bad record with White against player B, being defeated in some main lines which are hard to avoid otherwise. Player A may then opt to choose the King's Indian Attack, to avoid said lines.</p>
  <p>As for why it's rarely used at top level: it is relatively easy with Black to get a playable position with even chances. White's aim is to get an advantage out of the opening, and the King's Indian Attack is not promising enough.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-10-06T16:37:33.977Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-10-06T16:37:33.977Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Glorfindel
Answers.Body: <p>In his early days, Fischer would use it to avoid the French Defense, for example. It's not uncommon for e4 players to transpose into it in the face of any of the half-open defenses (French, Sicilian, Caro-Kan, etc.) they hadn't yet found a line they wanted to trust. Or for d4 players to steer away from lines they're uncomfortable playing (KIA-to-Catalan transitions come to mind in those cases).</p>
  <p>Scenario: The variation I usually play against the French has suddenly developed a leak -- someone recently played a move against me I hadn't seen before and I haven't had the time or the ability to &quot;solve&quot; that move. I might then transpose (after 1. e4 e6) into a KIA, essentially &quot;bailing out&quot; of a situation I wasn't comfortable with to one I'm more comfortable with. This particular scenario doesn't typically happen in top-level chess, as those players are surprised less frequently, and typically have a &quot;fallback&quot; opening prepared in the case of their main weapon having issues.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-10-11T22:07:15.897Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-10-11T22:07:15.897Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Arlen
Body: <p>I am <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%27s_Indian_Attack" rel="nofollow noreferrer">reading</a> about the King's Indian Attack (aka Barcza System), and article says that this system is &quot;rarely used at the highest levels except to avoid certain pet lines&quot;. I wonder what are those lines, and if there is some important reason why the KIA is &quot;rarely used&quot;?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-10-06T17:12:58.433Z
Comments.Text: Please note that "rarely used" applies only to the very top players. If you go to the average open tournament filled with 1800-2200 FIDE players, you'll see King's Indian Attacks all over teh place
Comments.UserDisplayName: David
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-10-07T12:19:30.483Z
Comments.Text: A "pet line" is some player's personal preference.  Any line can be a pet line for someone.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Michael West
Tags: <opening><terminology><kings-indian-attack>
Title: King's Indian Attack - "pet lines"
ThreadText: # King's Indian Attack - "pet lines"
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-10-06)
  
  I am [reading](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%27s_Indian_Attack) about the King's Indian Attack (aka Barcza System), and article says that this system is "rarely used at the highest levels except to avoid certain pet lines". I wonder what are those lines, and if there is some important reason why the KIA is "rarely used"?
  
  **Tags:** opening, terminology, kings-indian-attack
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Please note that "rarely used" applies only to the very top players. If you go to the average open tournament filled with 1800-2200 FIDE players, you'll see King's Indian Attacks all over teh place  
  > **username_2**: A "pet line" is some player's personal preference.  Any line can be a pet line for someone.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2021-10-06. Score: 6
  
  Those lines can be *any* opening variation; suppose player A has a bad record with White against player B, being defeated in some main lines which are hard to avoid otherwise. Player A may then opt to choose the King's Indian Attack, to avoid said lines.
  
  As for why it's rarely used at top level: it is relatively easy with Black to get a playable position with even chances. White's aim is to get an advantage out of the opening, and the King's Indian Attack is not promising enough.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2021-10-11. Score: 1
  
  In his early days, Fischer would use it to avoid the French Defense, for example. It's not uncommon for e4 players to transpose into it in the face of any of the half-open defenses (French, Sicilian, Caro-Kan, etc.) they hadn't yet found a line they wanted to trust. Or for d4 players to steer away from lines they're uncomfortable playing (KIA-to-Catalan transitions come to mind in those cases).
  
  Scenario: The variation I usually play against the French has suddenly developed a leak -- someone recently played a move against me I hadn't seen before and I haven't had the time or the ability to "solve" that move. I might then transpose (after 1. e4 e6) into a KIA, essentially "bailing out" of a situation I wasn't comfortable with to one I'm more comfortable with. This particular scenario doesn't typically happen in top-level chess, as those players are surprised less frequently, and typically have a "fallback" opening prepared in the case of their main weapon having issues.
  
  
  ---
  
  