Answers.Body: <p>With a light squared bishop, you (usually) want your pawns to be on <em>opposite</em> colored squares, i.e. the dark squares. This is particularly true because the opposing bishop is dark squared.</p>
  
  <p>The pawns are supposed to protect <em>each other</em> (on dark squares). In doing so, they block the opposing bishop. Your bishop is supposed to "cover" those (light) squares not protected by your pawns.</p>
  
  <p>If both your bishop and pawns are on light squares, the opposing king (and bishop) will be able to run all over the dark squares. Meanwhile, the pawns are in the way of your own bishop. This will put you at a severe disadvantage.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-17T00:17:19.030Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-07-17T02:52:10.627Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2012-07-17T02:52:10.627Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tom Au
Answers.Body: <p>Well, it may be irrelevant to answer an 11-year-old question, but there's still a thing not mentioned in previous answers.</p>
  <p>In an opposite-colored bishop endgame (i.e. when both you and your opponent have only a king, a single bishop and pawns (no knights, rooks etc.), and your bishops travel on opposite colors), it depends on whether you are attacking or defending side.</p>
  <p>When you are the attacking side (i.e. having chances to win), it's still better to place your pawns on opposite color of your bishop (i.e. the same color as your opponent's bishop), since otherwise your pawns can be blockaded and cannot cross a diagonal which is firmly controlled by your opponent (usually by both his king and bishop). (For example, white pawns on the light squares g6, f5 and e4 can be blocked with the black dark-squared bishop along the a1-h8 diagonal.)</p>
  <p><em>But, if you have to defend</em>, it's often better to go the other way round, namely placing your pawns on the same color as your bishop. That's because your remaining pawns are easier to be protected (with your bishop), and they are invulnerable to both the opponent's bishop (traveling on opposite color) and his king (since he cannot capture protected pieces).</p>
  <p>Of course, there are exceptions to this rule of thumb, but it holds in many positions.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-01T21:00:08.513Z
Answers.Text: Maybe I'm daft, but how is this different than the answer given by Andrew?
Answers.UserDisplayName: NoseKnowsAll
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-01T21:03:33.187Z
Answers.Text: @NoseKnowsAll well, to be honest, he did not mention that this principle is suitable only for "pure" opposite-colored bishop endgame. If we add another piece (a rook or a knight for example) to each side, this may easily turn wrong.
Answers.UserDisplayName: trolley813
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-02T10:41:12.227Z
Answers.Text: The thing I don't get with this advice is that if you are playing for a win, presumably you are trying to queen at least one of those pawns. So you can't just park it on a certain colour?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Steve Bennett
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-04T19:35:32.743Z
Answers.Text: @SteveBennett as usual, you should push the pawns in a way that they cannot be blockaded. So, for example, if you (as White) have a dark-squared bishop and pawns on c4 and d4 (your opponent has a light-squared bishop), you usually have to play d4-d5 (and then c4-c5-c6). If you play c4-c5 first, your pawns will end up on dark squares, and Black will be able to hold them by placing his bishop along the a8-h1 diagonal.
Answers.UserDisplayName: trolley813
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2023-05-01T20:01:25.763Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2023-05-01T20:01:25.763Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: trolley813
Answers.Body: <p>The rule of thumb is that the stronger side (the side trying to win) should put the pawns on the opposite color of his or her bishop (so that they don't get in the way), and the weaker side should put pawns on the same color as their bishop in order to defend them an extra time (defended with the bishop and the king, the opponent can never win a pawn).</p>
  
  <p>There are obviously exceptions to this, though.  Each position really has to be judged independently.  </p>
  
  <p>One key idea, however, is that it is usually a good idea to block your opponent's pawns on the same color as the bishops (assuming that the two bishops are both light squared bishops or both dark squared bishops).  This gives you the chance to try and win the pawn later and it will restrict the movement of your opponent's bishop.  </p>
  
  <p>If you have the only bishop on the board (your opponent has a knight, for example) it is almost always correct to put the pawns on the opposite colored squares of the bishop.  This is usually the only way to play for a win.  This touches on the <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/588/12">good bishop/bad bishop question</a>, but if your bishop is bad, then the knight will many times have the edge.  If your bishop is good, however, you can try to make use of the bishop's superior range.  </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2012-07-16T22:01:26.757Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2012-07-16T22:01:26.757Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-13T12:48:53.193Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Andrew
Body: <p>This slightly confuses me.  If I have one bishop left - let's say it is the light-squared bishop - ss it better for my pawns to be on the light squares or dark squares?  Let's assume also that my opponent has a dark-squared bishop.  The way I look at it it is like this (which is probably wrong).  If my pawns are on the light squares, I can protect them with my bishop, but they block my bishop.  If my pawns are on the dark squares, they don't block my bishop, but I can't protect them.</p>
  
  <p>Does it make a difference if the opponent has a bishop left that is the same color as yours, or has no bishop left?</p>
  
Tags: <strategy><endgame><bishops><positional-play><bad-bishop>
Title: What color squares should pawns be on with one bishop left?
ThreadText: # What color squares should pawns be on with one bishop left?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2012-07-16)
  
  This slightly confuses me. If I have one bishop left - let's say it is the light-squared bishop - ss it better for my pawns to be on the light squares or dark squares? Let's assume also that my opponent has a dark-squared bishop. The way I look at it it is like this (which is probably wrong). If my pawns are on the light squares, I can protect them with my bishop, but they block my bishop. If my pawns are on the dark squares, they don't block my bishop, but I can't protect them.
  
  Does it make a difference if the opponent has a bishop left that is the same color as yours, or has no bishop left?
  
  **Tags:** strategy, endgame, bishops, positional-play, bad-bishop
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 3 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2012-07-16. Score: 14 | Accepted answer
  
  The rule of thumb is that the stronger side (the side trying to win) should put the pawns on the opposite color of his or her bishop (so that they don't get in the way), and the weaker side should put pawns on the same color as their bishop in order to defend them an extra time (defended with the bishop and the king, the opponent can never win a pawn).
  
  There are obviously exceptions to this, though. Each position really has to be judged independently.
  
  One key idea, however, is that it is usually a good idea to block your opponent's pawns on the same color as the bishops (assuming that the two bishops are both light squared bishops or both dark squared bishops). This gives you the chance to try and win the pawn later and it will restrict the movement of your opponent's bishop.
  
  If you have the only bishop on the board (your opponent has a knight, for example) it is almost always correct to put the pawns on the opposite colored squares of the bishop. This is usually the only way to play for a win. This touches on the [good bishop/bad bishop question](https://chess.stackexchange.com/q/588/12), but if your bishop is bad, then the knight will many times have the edge. If your bishop is good, however, you can try to make use of the bishop's superior range.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2012-07-17. Score: 3
  
  With a light squared bishop, you (usually) want your pawns to be on *opposite* colored squares, i.e. the dark squares. This is particularly true because the opposing bishop is dark squared.
  
  The pawns are supposed to protect *each other* (on dark squares). In doing so, they block the opposing bishop. Your bishop is supposed to "cover" those (light) squares not protected by your pawns.
  
  If both your bishop and pawns are on light squares, the opposing king (and bishop) will be able to run all over the dark squares. Meanwhile, the pawns are in the way of your own bishop. This will put you at a severe disadvantage.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2023-05-01. Score: 1
  
  Well, it may be irrelevant to answer an 11-year-old question, but there's still a thing not mentioned in previous answers.
  
  In an opposite-colored bishop endgame (i.e. when both you and your opponent have only a king, a single bishop and pawns (no knights, rooks etc.), and your bishops travel on opposite colors), it depends on whether you are attacking or defending side.
  
  When you are the attacking side (i.e. having chances to win), it's still better to place your pawns on opposite color of your bishop (i.e. the same color as your opponent's bishop), since otherwise your pawns can be blockaded and cannot cross a diagonal which is firmly controlled by your opponent (usually by both his king and bishop). (For example, white pawns on the light squares g6, f5 and e4 can be blocked with the black dark-squared bishop along the a1-h8 diagonal.)
  
  *But, if you have to defend*, it's often better to go the other way round, namely placing your pawns on the same color as your bishop. That's because your remaining pawns are easier to be protected (with your bishop), and they are invulnerable to both the opponent's bishop (traveling on opposite color) and his king (since he cannot capture protected pieces).
  
  Of course, there are exceptions to this rule of thumb, but it holds in many positions.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_3**: Maybe I'm daft, but how is this different than the answer given by username_5?  
  > **username_2**: @username_3 well, to be honest, he did not mention that this principle is suitable only for "pure" opposite-colored bishop endgame. If we add another piece (a rook or a knight for example) to each side, this may easily turn wrong.  
  > **username_4**: The thing I don't get with this advice is that if you are playing for a win, presumably you are trying to queen at least one of those pawns. So you can't just park it on a certain colour?  
  > **username_2**: @SteveBennett as usual, you should push the pawns in a way that they cannot be blockaded. So, for example, if you (as White) have a dark-squared bishop and pawns on c4 and d4 (your opponent has a light-squared bishop), you usually have to play d4-d5 (and then c4-c5-c6). If you play c4-c5 first, your pawns will end up on dark squares, and Black will be able to hold them by placing his bishop along the a8-h1 diagonal.  
  
  ---
  
  