Answers.Body: <p>The sidebar says &quot;1. Qe7# (1. Qc8#) (1. Qb8#)&quot;.</p>
  <p>In case you're not yet familiar with chess notation, this means:</p>
  <ul>
  <li><strong>1​.</strong> (White's move number 1)</li>
  <li><strong>Q</strong> (the Queen)</li>
  <li><strong>e7</strong> (moves to space E7)</li>
  <li><strong>#</strong> (and checkmates.)</li>
  </ul>
  <p>After that, your move &quot;(1. Qc8#)&quot; is highlighted in red, indicating it was not one of the answers they were looking for. But note that it is given the checkmate mark (#), confirming that your move in fact a correct move, one that they simply forgot to include in the list of answers.</p>
  <p>&quot;(1. Qb8#)&quot; written at the end is an additional move which is equally as valid as the first one. Qc8# should have been included here, but it was mistakenly left out.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-08T22:05:53.313Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2024-03-10T16:40:25.433Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2024-03-10T16:40:25.433Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Dee S.
Answers.Body: <p>That is checkmate. You are simply using a bad tool.</p>
  <p>For simple mate in one exercises I recommend my own website.
  For example, this link <a href="https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1/?2vs1" rel="noreferrer">https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1/?2vs1</a> has mate in 1 puzzles where the stronger side has two chessmen against a lone king. The good points about my system are:</p>
  <p>(1) all alternatives are accepted,</p>
  <p>(2) if you play an incorrect move then the computer will simply reply with a move that demonstrates that there was no checkmate after your first move.</p>
  <p>Moreover, you can study the checkmate position by trying to make moves with the checkmated side. Then you will see arrows pointing to moves that would capture the king.</p>
  <p>You can also move on a step further and try to solve puzzles where the task is to avoid getting mated on the next move. For example <a href="https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1-avoid/?2vs1" rel="noreferrer">https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1-avoid/?2vs1</a> has the same positions as the first link but now you play with the lone king to avoid mate.</p>
  <p>More puzzles for beginners are listed on the table of contents at <a href="https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-09T10:09:55.403Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-09T10:09:55.403Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: MichalRyszardWojcik
Answers.Body: <p>While everyone is correct here in assuring you this is a checkmate and the tool is wrong , I am not seeing them explaining how you could verify this and since you are learning this might be useful to you:</p>
  <ol>
  <li>The black king is indeed in check by the white queen as the white queen can move anywhere on row eight</li>
  <li>The black king does not have any moves where it would not be in check. It has five possible moves, two to the row eight which , as we just noted, are covered by the white queen and three to the row seven all of which are covered by the white king.</li>
  </ol>
  <p>For example moving the queen to D7 or D8 would not be a checkmate. Can you figure out why in each case? The reasons are different.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-11T08:08:06.797Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-11T08:08:06.797Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: chx
Answers.Body: <p>That is indeed checkmate, I've been playing chess for months.</p>
  <p>It must be an issue with either the code (which is probably the problem), or the client or server (which is very unlikely, but could be the case). There are other chess websites where you can learn, such as <a href="https://lichess.org/learn#/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://lichess.org/learn#/</a> and <a href="https://www.chess.com/lessons" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.chess.com/lessons</a>.</p>
  <p>Those should work better, while they still have a few problems, it's not really too much.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-08T23:10:28.183Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-08T23:10:28.183Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: SpeedoThreeSixty
Answers.Body: <p>The website (or that chess problem on that site specifically) is clearly buggy.<br />
  All 3 of the moves listed as correct answers are mates, and even shown with #<br />
  Qe7#  Qc8# Qb8#</p>
  <p>My guess as to what happened:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>The web site supports various different kinds of problems, including &quot;one correct move&quot;.</li>
  <li>It doesn't have a chess engine checking for mates, just that they match some pre-programmed answers. <strong>It relies on humans to set up the correct-answer conditions separately from the question and answer text.</strong>  (Introducing the possibility of human error causing this problem.)</li>
  <li><strong>A human entered correct problem and answer text, but accidentally marked it as only the first answer being correct.</strong>  Or some kind of syntax error or other mis-use of the problem-setting tools that made the website not understand that any of the answers were valid.</li>
  </ul>
  <p>That would explain why all 3 listed moves have a <code>#</code> checkmate symbol after them: those are manually-entered text, and the web site doesn't truly <em>know</em> they're checkmates.  Or doesn't know that they question is looking for checkmates, because programming that is separate from writing the text.</p>
  <hr />
  <p>In future, if you encounter something online that seems to be telling you something that seems wrong, you can load up the position in a chess engine you trust and try it.  Maybe you'll find there was a legal move you didn't spot.</p>
  <p>As a beginner (or for any human) it's certainly possible to make mistakes.  But this case is simple enough that it's pretty easy even for me (very much non-expert) to be pretty sure that all 3 of those moves are mates, and that there aren't any other mates.  But it wouldn't take much more complexity for me to <em>not</em> be sure if a problem was buggy or if I was missing something.</p>
  <p>In this case, the 3 listed moves that pop up being shown with <code>#</code> makes it fairly clear it's a bug, though.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-09T19:11:51.937Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-09T19:11:51.937Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Peter Cordes
Answers.Body: <p>The highlighted &quot;Qc8#&quot; in your screenshot means, I think, that the displayed move is not the one you made but Qc8# (<a href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_notation_(chess)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">which means</a> that the queen moves to the c8 square, effecting checkmate). You probably made a different move which is not shown in your screenshot.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-10T07:59:33.477Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-10T07:59:33.477Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: msh210
Answers.Body: <p>Definitely a checkmate. Must’ve been a computer glitch or maybe it was asking something else. Maybe was asking for a stalemate. Or it asked if you could stretch it out to 3 moves. Just to stretch it out as an exercise. Rather than mate in one.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-09T23:55:38.837Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-10T00:53:41.327Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2020-08-10T00:53:41.327Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Stan
Answers.Body: <p>Welcome to Chess Stack Exchange.</p>
  <p>I believe you're doing well here.  It is surely a checkmate. Probably the website isn't programmed that way to recognize that move. But, as per your question, this is clearly a checkmate that resembles the one-rook-mate pattern.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-08-08T12:53:42.207Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-08-08T12:53:42.207Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Blunder King
Body: <p>I am new to chess. I have tried to learn checkmate from the video lesson in chess24 website. There, in one question, it marked my answer wrong and said that it was not checkmate. Can anyone please explain the reason ?</p>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ZOXMO.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ZOXMO.png" alt="Checkmate" /></a></p>
  
Tags: <checkmate><online-chess>
Title: Why is it not a checkmate?
ThreadText: # Why is it not a checkmate?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-08-08)
  
  I am new to chess. I have tried to learn checkmate from the video lesson in chess24 website. There, in one question, it marked my answer wrong and said that it was not checkmate. Can anyone please explain the reason ?
  
  [![Checkmate](https://i.sstatic.net/ZOXMO.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/ZOXMO.png)
  
  **Tags:** checkmate, online-chess
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 8 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2020-08-08. Score: 38 | Accepted answer
  
  Welcome to Chess Stack Exchange.
  
  I believe you're doing well here. It is surely a checkmate. Probably the website isn't programmed that way to recognize that move. But, as per your question, this is clearly a checkmate that resembles the one-rook-mate pattern.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-08-08. Score: 23
  
  The sidebar says "1. Qe7# (1. Qc8#) (1. Qb8#)".
  
  In case you're not yet familiar with chess notation, this means:
  
  * **1​.** (White's move number 1)
  * **Q** (the Queen)
  * **e7** (moves to space E7)
  * **#** (and checkmates.)
  
  After that, your move "(1. Qc8#)" is highlighted in red, indicating it was not one of the answers they were looking for. But note that it is given the checkmate mark (#), confirming that your move in fact a correct move, one that they simply forgot to include in the list of answers.
  
  "(1. Qb8#)" written at the end is an additional move which is equally as valid as the first one. Qc8# should have been included here, but it was mistakenly left out.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2020-08-09. Score: 7
  
  That is checkmate. You are simply using a bad tool.
  
  For simple mate in one exercises I recommend my own website.
  For example, this link <https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1/?2vs1> has mate in 1 puzzles where the stronger side has two chessmen against a lone king. The good points about my system are:
  
  (1) all alternatives are accepted,
  
  (2) if you play an incorrect move then the computer will simply reply with a move that demonstrates that there was no checkmate after your first move.
  
  Moreover, you can study the checkmate position by trying to make moves with the checkmated side. Then you will see arrows pointing to moves that would capture the king.
  
  You can also move on a step further and try to solve puzzles where the task is to avoid getting mated on the next move. For example <https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-1-avoid/?2vs1> has the same positions as the first link but now you play with the lone king to avoid mate.
  
  More puzzles for beginners are listed on the table of contents at <https://www.apronus.com/chess/puzzles/>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2020-08-11. Score: 3
  
  While everyone is correct here in assuring you this is a checkmate and the tool is wrong , I am not seeing them explaining how you could verify this and since you are learning this might be useful to you:
  
  1. The black king is indeed in check by the white queen as the white queen can move anywhere on row eight
  2. The black king does not have any moves where it would not be in check. It has five possible moves, two to the row eight which , as we just noted, are covered by the white queen and three to the row seven all of which are covered by the white king.
  
  For example moving the queen to D7 or D8 would not be a checkmate. Can you figure out why in each case? The reasons are different.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2020-08-08. Score: 3
  
  That is indeed checkmate, I've been playing chess for months.
  
  It must be an issue with either the code (which is probably the problem), or the client or server (which is very unlikely, but could be the case). There are other chess websites where you can learn, such as <https://lichess.org/learn#/> and <https://www.chess.com/lessons>.
  
  Those should work better, while they still have a few problems, it's not really too much.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2020-08-09. Score: 3
  
  The website (or that chess problem on that site specifically) is clearly buggy.  
  All 3 of the moves listed as correct answers are mates, and even shown with #  
  Qe7# Qc8# Qb8#
  
  My guess as to what happened:
  
  * The web site supports various different kinds of problems, including "one correct move".
  * It doesn't have a chess engine checking for mates, just that they match some pre-programmed answers. **It relies on humans to set up the correct-answer conditions separately from the question and answer text.** (Introducing the possibility of human error causing this problem.)
  * **A human entered correct problem and answer text, but accidentally marked it as only the first answer being correct.** Or some kind of syntax error or other mis-use of the problem-setting tools that made the website not understand that any of the answers were valid.
  
  That would explain why all 3 listed moves have a `#` checkmate symbol after them: those are manually-entered text, and the web site doesn't truly *know* they're checkmates. Or doesn't know that they question is looking for checkmates, because programming that is separate from writing the text.
  
  ---
  
  In future, if you encounter something online that seems to be telling you something that seems wrong, you can load up the position in a chess engine you trust and try it. Maybe you'll find there was a legal move you didn't spot.
  
  As a beginner (or for any human) it's certainly possible to make mistakes. But this case is simple enough that it's pretty easy even for me (very much non-expert) to be pretty sure that all 3 of those moves are mates, and that there aren't any other mates. But it wouldn't take much more complexity for me to *not* be sure if a problem was buggy or if I was missing something.
  
  In this case, the 3 listed moves that pop up being shown with `#` makes it fairly clear it's a bug, though.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2020-08-10. Score: 2
  
  The highlighted "Qc8#" in your screenshot means, I think, that the displayed move is not the one you made but Qc8# ([which means](//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_notation_(chess)) that the queen moves to the c8 square, effecting checkmate). You probably made a different move which is not shown in your screenshot.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2020-08-09. Score: 2
  
  Definitely a checkmate. Must’ve been a computer glitch or maybe it was asking something else. Maybe was asking for a stalemate. Or it asked if you could stretch it out to 3 moves. Just to stretch it out as an exercise. Rather than mate in one.
  
  
  ---
  
  