Answers.Body: <p>If a game has a recognized name, you would do well to study it. Some widely acclaimed examples include:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortal_Game" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Immortal Game</a> (Aderssen vs. Kieseritzky, London 1851)</li>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_Game" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Evergreen Game</a> (Anderssen vs. Dufresne, Berlin 1852)</li>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_Game" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Opera Game</a> (Morphy vs. Rufus and Dufus, Paris 1858)</li>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitsky_versus_Marshall" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Gold Coin Game</a> (Levitsky vs. Marshall, Breslau 1912)</li>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hastings_1895_chess_tournament#Notable_games" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Battle of Hastings</a> (Steinitz vs. von Bardeleben, Hastings 1895)</li>
  <li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_of_the_Century_(chess)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Game of the Century</a> (Fischer vs. Byrne, New York 1956)</li>
  </ul>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-17T20:48:28.163Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-17T20:48:28.163Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: ATM
Answers.Body: <p>I got the perfect link for ya its the start of a series of videos by IM John Bartholemew geared for lower rated players and going up into the 2000s eventually very well explained extremely helpful for any rating as there are several videos in the series its entitled climbing the chess ladder starts sub 1000 really helped me a lot enjoy <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2huVf1l4UE" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2huVf1l4UE</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-17T06:50:57.573Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-17T06:50:57.573Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: XCATHADOR
Answers.Body: <p>I would suggest to play over GM games from a book.   It goes at your pace.  Easy to see,  no audio problems like so many videos have.
  Easy to go back if you want to see the last couple moves again.</p>
  
  <p>Whilst playing GM games is very useful.  Especially if you concentrate on one opening.  But if you really want to improve then you will need to look at openings, end games, tactics, and later pawn structure, positional play, psychology, and more. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-17T05:03:48.607Z
Answers.Text: i have thought about his myself. can you suggest some good books for this? I have Bobby Fischer my 60 memorable games
Answers.UserDisplayName: srk_cb
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-17T15:06:59.163Z
Answers.Text: Not really.  I have not bought a chess book for almost 50 years now.  The one that helped me a lot was the tournament book from the 1953 candidates tournament with 16 top GM playing a double RR.  It was annotated by Najdorf.  Fischer liked 64 from Russia.  These days there are many places to get recent tournament games.  I think one is called Chess Informant.  I never saw a copy of that though.  And there are GM games online.  One site has them all by opening.
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-15T20:37:13.763Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-15T20:37:13.763Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: yobamamama
Answers.Body: <p>I think the best channel to watch chess games on is PowerPlayChess. GM King has the talent to make little storyies out of very complex games that help in learning how grandmasters play.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T13:07:10.883Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-16T13:23:45.013Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-16T13:23:45.013Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: quielywhis
Answers.Body: <p>I have been studying AlphaZero's games,  since it is probably the strongest chess entity to ever exist :  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuRq84F2fkA" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuRq84F2fkA</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-07-21T00:29:25.123Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-07-21T00:29:25.123Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ian Olsen
Answers.Body: <p>First, by far the most popular chess YouTuber is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5YbN5WLFD8dLIegT5QAbA" rel="noreferrer">Agadmator</a>. His channel does a nice job of going over famous games, and explaining them.</p>
  
  <p>Other good videos are what are called "banter blitz". Banter blitz is when players, and you want to watch Masters, explain what they are thinking aloud as they are playing. You can then get a better idea of what we see, and what we are striving for. You can search "banter blitz" on YouTube. There are even many games by World Champion, Magnus Carlsen.</p>
  
  <p>That actually gets into a deeper question, and that is if modern games are as easy to learn from, and I think the answer is "no". The problem is that in modern chess, everyone at the top level is so good, that even if one player is a weaker 2650 GM compared to the 2750 GM he is playing, both have a deep understanding of chess. They both counter each other's plans too effectively, that you cannot see a clear path from the beginning of a plan to the end of a plan.</p>
  
  <p>That is one of the reasons that the older greats like Lasker, Capablanca, and Alekhine are great to study. They often played strong players, but still players that were in a different class, so you could see a clear plan from beginning to end, and the opponent put up resistance, but minimal resistance (I mean positionally, speaking). This also allowed these greats to annotate these games very clearly, showing you what they were trying to achieve, and exactly how they did it.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T10:23:50.467Z
Answers.Text: Agadmator doesn't explain the games very well in my opinion, he mostly just recites the moves and explains some tactics which occurred in the position. You can't analyse a game and understand it properly in 10-15 minutes. I would suggest taking a look at some older KingsCrusher videos (For example, I think his analysis of Kasparov's immortal is the best on youtube), as well as some st. Louis chess club analysis videos.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Ardweaden
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T10:32:53.863Z
Answers.Text: @Ardweaden The explanations really depend on the level of the person watching. I have been a Master for a long time, so I might not find his stuff as illuminating; but the original poster says "I have just started learning to play chess", so the explanations I have seen seem decent for his level. That said, I have only seen some of his videos, and have not spent hours watching.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T14:24:48.723Z
Answers.Text: ChessNetwork’s analyses are often clearer to me than Agadmator’s
Answers.UserDisplayName: D. Ben Knoble
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T16:42:57.463Z
Answers.Text: I agree that agadmator is usually not very helpful, mostly just saying "and then white played this move and black played that move", and second the recommendation for chessnetwork's videos.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Gareth McCaughan
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T16:44:41.077Z
Answers.Text: (I'd also question whether _watching games_ should be a major part of how anyone learns. I'm sure it's useful to do it a bit, but I'd have thought more active things like playing games and solving tactics puzzles should be a much larger fraction of one's learning time.)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Gareth McCaughan
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T19:08:43.480Z
Answers.Text: @GarethMcCaughanIf you read many of my other answers, you would see that I agree, but we have to answer the question that was asked.
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-12-15T19:33:35.227Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-12-15T20:08:26.207Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2019-12-15T20:08:26.207Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: PhishMaster
Body: <p>I have just started learning to play chess and I find it really interesting to learn. I would like to learn as much as possible in order to become a good player. I looked on Youtube, trying to find games to watch that can teach me how to play. In particular my idea is to watch a lot of games in order to understand how the best players in the world think while playing. </p>
  
  <p>So, can someone suggest some games to watch that are considered remarkable games?</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2019-12-16T21:14:07.590Z
Comments.Text: It's worth mentioning that you become better by _playing chess_. I'd focus more on that than on theory, especially as a beginner.
Comments.UserDisplayName: user428517
Tags: <analysis><learning><famous-games>
Title: What are some games I can watch to become better in playing chess?
ThreadText: # What are some games I can watch to become better in playing chess?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-12-15)
  
  I have just started learning to play chess and I find it really interesting to learn. I would like to learn as much as possible in order to become a good player. I looked on Youtube, trying to find games to watch that can teach me how to play. In particular my idea is to watch a lot of games in order to understand how the best players in the world think while playing.
  
  So, can someone suggest some games to watch that are considered remarkable games?
  
  **Tags:** analysis, learning, famous-games
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: It's worth mentioning that you become better by _playing chess_. I'd focus more on that than on theory, especially as a beginner.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 6 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_8 on 2019-12-15. Score: 10 | Accepted answer
  
  First, by far the most popular chess YouTuber is [Agadmator](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5YbN5WLFD8dLIegT5QAbA). His channel does a nice job of going over famous games, and explaining them.
  
  Other good videos are what are called "banter blitz". Banter blitz is when players, and you want to watch Masters, explain what they are thinking aloud as they are playing. You can then get a better idea of what we see, and what we are striving for. You can search "banter blitz" on YouTube. There are even many games by World Champion, Magnus Carlsen.
  
  That actually gets into a deeper question, and that is if modern games are as easy to learn from, and I think the answer is "no". The problem is that in modern chess, everyone at the top level is so good, that even if one player is a weaker 2650 GM compared to the 2750 GM he is playing, both have a deep understanding of chess. They both counter each other's plans too effectively, that you cannot see a clear path from the beginning of a plan to the end of a plan.
  
  That is one of the reasons that the older greats like Lasker, Capablanca, and Alekhine are great to study. They often played strong players, but still players that were in a different class, so you could see a clear plan from beginning to end, and the opponent put up resistance, but minimal resistance (I mean positionally, speaking). This also allowed these greats to annotate these games very clearly, showing you what they were trying to achieve, and exactly how they did it.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_9**: Agadmator doesn't explain the games very well in my opinion, he mostly just recites the moves and explains some tactics which occurred in the position. You can't analyse a game and understand it properly in 10-15 minutes. I would suggest taking a look at some older KingsCrusher videos (For example, I think his analysis of Kasparov's immortal is the best on youtube), as well as some st. Louis chess club analysis videos.  
  > **username_8**: @username_9 The explanations really depend on the level of the person watching. I have been a Master for a long time, so I might not find his stuff as illuminating; but the original poster says "I have just started learning to play chess", so the explanations I have seen seem decent for his level. That said, I have only seen some of his videos, and have not spent hours watching.  
  > **username_10**: ChessNetwork’s analyses are often clearer to me than Agadmator’s  
  > **username_11**: I agree that agadmator is usually not very helpful, mostly just saying "and then white played this move and black played that move", and second the recommendation for chessnetwork's videos.  
  > **username_11**: (I'd also question whether _watching games_ should be a major part of how anyone learns. I'm sure it's useful to do it a bit, but I'd have thought more active things like playing games and solving tactics puzzles should be a much larger fraction of one's learning time.)  
  > **username_8**: @GarethMcCaughanIf you read many of my other answers, you would see that I agree, but we have to answer the question that was asked.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2019-12-17. Score: 4
  
  If a game has a recognized name, you would do well to study it. Some widely acclaimed examples include:
  
  * [The Immortal Game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortal_Game) (Aderssen vs. Kieseritzky, London 1851)
  * [The Evergreen Game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_Game) (Anderssen vs. Dufresne, Berlin 1852)
  * [The Opera Game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_Game) (Morphy vs. Rufus and Dufus, Paris 1858)
  * [The Gold Coin Game](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitsky_versus_Marshall) (Levitsky vs. Marshall, Breslau 1912)
  * [The Battle of Hastings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hastings_1895_chess_tournament#Notable_games) (Steinitz vs. von Bardeleben, Hastings 1895)
  * [The Game of the Century](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_of_the_Century_(chess)) (Fischer vs. Byrne, New York 1956)
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2019-12-17. Score: 3
  
  I got the perfect link for ya its the start of a series of videos by IM John Bartholemew geared for lower rated players and going up into the 2000s eventually very well explained extremely helpful for any rating as there are several videos in the series its entitled climbing the chess ladder starts sub 1000 really helped me a lot enjoy <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2huVf1l4UE>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2019-12-15. Score: 2
  
  I would suggest to play over GM games from a book. It goes at your pace. Easy to see, no audio problems like so many videos have.
  Easy to go back if you want to see the last couple moves again.
  
  Whilst playing GM games is very useful. Especially if you concentrate on one opening. But if you really want to improve then you will need to look at openings, end games, tactics, and later pawn structure, positional play, psychology, and more.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_5**: i have thought about his myself. can you suggest some good books for this? I have Bobby Fischer my 60 memorable games  
  > **username_4**: Not really.  I have not bought a chess book for almost 50 years now.  The one that helped me a lot was the tournament book from the 1953 candidates tournament with 16 top GM playing a double RR.  It was annotated by Najdorf.  Fischer liked 64 from Russia.  These days there are many places to get recent tournament games.  I think one is called Chess Informant.  I never saw a copy of that though.  And there are GM games online.  One site has them all by opening.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2019-12-16. Score: 2
  
  I think the best channel to watch chess games on is PowerPlayChess. GM King has the talent to make little storyies out of very complex games that help in learning how grandmasters play.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2022-07-21. Score: 0
  
  I have been studying AlphaZero's games, since it is probably the strongest chess entity to ever exist : <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuRq84F2fkA>
  
  
  ---
  
  