Answers.Body: <p>No, you may not move that piece to another square even if you have not yet pressed your clock.</p>
  <p>From the FIDE Laws, art. 4.7.:</p>
  <p>When, as a legal move or part of a legal move, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move.</p>
  <p>(Art. 4.7 continues with further laws regarding captures, castling and promotion.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:06:17.983Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-16T14:06:17.983Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Rosie F
Answers.Body: <p>You didn't ask, but note &quot;legal&quot; in the answers: if you made an illegal move, and did not press the clock, you may and must change it, and usually (modulo §E11.5, &quot;Do not distract your opponent in any way!&quot;) get scot-free. In German even the part on the board (&quot;Zug ausgeführt&quot;) and on the clock (&quot;Zug abgeschlossen&quot;) have different names in the FIDE rules to easily distinguish these actions (I didn't memorize the English names).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T15:53:55.090Z
Answers.Text: In English the difference is between a move being "made" (let go of the piece) and "completed" (pressed the clock).
Answers.UserDisplayName: RemcoGerlich
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:32:35.173Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-16T14:32:35.173Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.Body: <p>It is not allowed to change your move: <a href="https://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/LawsOfChess.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/LawsOfChess.pdf</a></p>
  <p>&quot;When, as a legal move or part of a legal move, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move.&quot;</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:05:50.090Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-16T14:05:50.090Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: koedem
Answers.Body: <p>When I first started playing competitive chess 50 years ago what you describe was standard practice in blitz but not allowed in standard time control chess. Nowadays it is not allowed at all except in the case that moving the piece was not legal, for instance because it left your king in check or placed your king in check.</p>
  <p>According to the current <a href="https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/E012018" rel="noreferrer">FIDE Laws of Chess</a>:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>4.7 When, <strong>as a legal move or part of a legal move</strong>, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><strong>Legal</strong> and <strong>illegal</strong> moves are defined so:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>3.10.1   A move is <strong>legal</strong> when all the relevant requirements of Articles 3.1 – 3.9 have been fulfilled.<br />
  3.10.2  A move is <strong>illegal</strong> when it fails to meet the relevant requirements of Articles 3.1 – 3.9</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>There are two cases when the requirement for the move to be legal would allow you to take the move back, indeed <em>require</em> you to do so.</p>
  <p>The first is if your king ended up being in check after your move:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>3.9.2 No piece can be moved that will either expose the king of the same colour to check or leave that king in check.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>The second is if you move a piece in a way it is not allowed to. You can take the move back if, in your example, you moved your queen to a square it is not allowed to move to, for instance you moved the queen like a knight:</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>3.4 The queen may move to any square along the file, the rank or a diagonal on which it stands.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/VScdt.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/VScdt.png" alt="Legal queen moves" /></a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:47:50.320Z
Answers.Text: I wonder why they only give illegal move after pressing the clock, moving the queen like a knight multiple times can be used to distract the opponent..., what if the queen starts moving like a knight and starts  caputuring all the pieces ...., and then resets and then plays a legal move .....?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Vivaan Daga
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T06:30:05.337Z
Answers.Text: Curious. I'm not a chess player, so the 4.7 rule seems odd to me. Why was it implemented? I mean, as long as you haven't turned off the clock (and thus finished your turn), who cares what you are doing on the board? As long as the end state is valid, what does ir matter if you changed your mind a couple of times?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Vilx-
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T09:07:51.993Z
Answers.Text: @Vilx: What you would be doing then is effectively analyzing one half-move. This isn't much, but I'd spot 90% of my blunders immediately. And analyzing a running game is a strict no-no. (Also, again 11.5, do not distract your opponent.)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Hauke Reddmann
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T09:31:29.893Z
Answers.Text: @Vilx-, it's really, really, distracting and annoying for the opponent. My experiences on this are mostly in go, but played with people who more than once took a stone out, moved it to the board, but didn't let before thinking about it for several seconds. (The same is moving a chess piece and not letting go.) Especially when the move they "made" was one I expected and had a reply ready, I automatically started to make my own move when seeing theirs... only to be frustrated that they didn't actually make the move after all. (In one case, they stopped that when I did the same...)
Answers.UserDisplayName: ilkkachu
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T13:34:59.020Z
Answers.Text: @Vilx- The same question could be asked about the touch-move rule to begin with ("as long as I do it on my time, who cares?"). The underlying principle is apparently that the state of the board should not be disturbed except by actually moving, and that all analysis is mental. In backgammon this rule does not exist and people shuffle their pieces around all the time in order to assess a possible move. Messing with pieces introduces an opportunity to cheat which actually may have some relevance in fast games. You see it occasionally in YouTube videos when hustlers are called out by GMs.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Peter - Reinstate Monica
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T20:13:10.100Z
Answers.Text: @Peter: The other problem is that you can look at your opponent's facial reactions when you touch your queen (or any other piece) to see whether they think you are about to blunder. But chess is supposed to be chess, not poker, so the touch move rule prevents you from taking advantage of such information.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Kevin
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-17T21:14:08.480Z
Answers.Text: @Kevin Backgammon is more like Poker ;-).
Answers.UserDisplayName: Peter - Reinstate Monica
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-18T14:35:08.367Z
Answers.Text: @Brian Towers I really wonder what would happen if someone really does what I described in the second part of the first comment, (Maybe they will set the pieces back incorrectly intentionally, and the player may not realise!!) .
Answers.UserDisplayName: Vivaan Daga
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-18T15:05:25.620Z
Answers.Text: @Logic This arbiter would be torn between defaulting you (you lose the game, your opponent wins) and throwing you out of the tournament altogether. I would probably consult with the tournament organizer before making my decision. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-18T15:07:48.757Z
Answers.Text: What law permits the arbiter to do that technically I have not made any Illegal moves…?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Vivaan Daga
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-18T15:15:29.327Z
Answers.Text: @Logic Check out article 11 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. It lists all the things you may not do as a player. There are many more things than just illegal moves. Article 11.1 is a catch all clause that allows the arbiter to punish you for any bad behaviour. For instance, if you punched your opponent in the nose you would just be thrown out immediately under 11.1
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:41:24.610Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-17T11:29:26.570Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2022-01-17T11:29:26.570Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brian Towers
Body: <p>Can I move a piece somewhere else if I left it but didn't press the clock?</p>
  <p>Suppose I touch my queen and then move my queen, keeping it on a square, and take my hand off. Then, before I press the clock, I realize that it's a wrong move. Thus, I move the queen to a different square and then press the clock. Is this allowed, or do I have to play the queen on the first square (if my opponent calls the arbiter)?</p>
  <p>I am getting conflicting answers. An official answer would be appreciated.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-01-16T14:33:13.573Z
Comments.Text: No, you can't. That's the reason why this [Polgar-Kasparov](https://youtu.be/Vkb7IqihJ0g) (Linares 1994) game was controversial.
Comments.UserDisplayName: emdio
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2022-01-21T12:31:25.157Z
Comments.Text: touch move vs clock move?
Comments.UserDisplayName: BCLC
Tags: <rules><pieces><otb-chess>
Title: Can I move a piece somewhere else if I left it but didn't press the clock?
ThreadText: # Can I move a piece somewhere else if I left it but didn't press the clock?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-01-16)
  
  Can I move a piece somewhere else if I left it but didn't press the clock?
  
  Suppose I touch my queen and then move my queen, keeping it on a square, and take my hand off. Then, before I press the clock, I realize that it's a wrong move. Thus, I move the queen to a different square and then press the clock. Is this allowed, or do I have to play the queen on the first square (if my opponent calls the arbiter)?
  
  I am getting conflicting answers. An official answer would be appreciated.
  
  **Tags:** rules, pieces, otb-chess
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: No, you can't. That's the reason why this [Polgar-Kasparov](https://youtu.be/Vkb7IqihJ0g) (Linares 1994) game was controversial.  
  > **username_2**: touch move vs clock move?  
  
  ---
  
  ## 4 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_7 on 2022-01-16. Score: 18 | Accepted answer
  
  When I first started playing competitive chess 50 years ago what you describe was standard practice in blitz but not allowed in standard time control chess. Nowadays it is not allowed at all except in the case that moving the piece was not legal, for instance because it left your king in check or placed your king in check.
  
  According to the current [FIDE Laws of Chess](https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/E012018):
  
  > 4.7 When, **as a legal move or part of a legal move**, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move.
  
  **Legal** and **illegal** moves are defined so:
  
  > 3.10.1 A move is **legal** when all the relevant requirements of Articles 3.1 – 3.9 have been fulfilled.  
  > 3.10.2 A move is **illegal** when it fails to meet the relevant requirements of Articles 3.1 – 3.9
  
  There are two cases when the requirement for the move to be legal would allow you to take the move back, indeed *require* you to do so.
  
  The first is if your king ended up being in check after your move:
  
  > 3.9.2 No piece can be moved that will either expose the king of the same colour to check or leave that king in check.
  
  The second is if you move a piece in a way it is not allowed to. You can take the move back if, in your example, you moved your queen to a square it is not allowed to move to, for instance you moved the queen like a knight:
  
  > 3.4 The queen may move to any square along the file, the rank or a diagonal on which it stands.
  
  [![Legal queen moves](https://i.sstatic.net/VScdt.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/VScdt.png)
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: I wonder why they only give illegal move after pressing the clock, moving the queen like a knight multiple times can be used to distract the opponent..., what if the queen starts moving like a knight and starts  caputuring all the pieces ...., and then resets and then plays a legal move .....?  
  > **username_8**: Curious. I'm not a chess player, so the 4.7 rule seems odd to me. Why was it implemented? I mean, as long as you haven't turned off the clock (and thus finished your turn), who cares what you are doing on the board? As long as the end state is valid, what does ir matter if you changed your mind a couple of times?  
  > **username_4**: @Vilx: What you would be doing then is effectively analyzing one half-move. This isn't much, but I'd spot 90% of my blunders immediately. And analyzing a running game is a strict no-no. (Also, again 11.5, do not distract your opponent.)  
  > **username_9**: @username_8, it's really, really, distracting and annoying for the opponent. My experiences on this are mostly in go, but played with people who more than once took a stone out, moved it to the board, but didn't let before thinking about it for several seconds. (The same is moving a chess piece and not letting go.) Especially when the move they "made" was one I expected and had a reply ready, I automatically started to make my own move when seeing theirs... only to be frustrated that they didn't actually make the move after all. (In one case, they stopped that when I did the same...)  
  > **username_10**: @username_8 The same question could be asked about the touch-move rule to begin with ("as long as I do it on my time, who cares?"). The underlying principle is apparently that the state of the board should not be disturbed except by actually moving, and that all analysis is mental. In backgammon this rule does not exist and people shuffle their pieces around all the time in order to assess a possible move. Messing with pieces introduces an opportunity to cheat which actually may have some relevance in fast games. You see it occasionally in YouTube videos when hustlers are called out by GMs.  
  > **username_11**: @Peter: The other problem is that you can look at your opponent's facial reactions when you touch your queen (or any other piece) to see whether they think you are about to blunder. But chess is supposed to be chess, not poker, so the touch move rule prevents you from taking advantage of such information.  
  > **username_10**: @username_11 Backgammon is more like Poker ;-).  
  > **username_0**: @username_7 I really wonder what would happen if someone really does what I described in the second part of the first comment, (Maybe they will set the pieces back incorrectly intentionally, and the player may not realise!!) .  
  > **username_7**: @Logic This arbiter would be torn between defaulting you (you lose the game, your opponent wins) and throwing you out of the tournament altogether. I would probably consult with the tournament organizer before making my decision. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable.  
  > **username_0**: What law permits the arbiter to do that technically I have not made any Illegal moves…?  
  > **username_7**: @Logic Check out article 11 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. It lists all the things you may not do as a player. There are many more things than just illegal moves. Article 11.1 is a catch all clause that allows the arbiter to punish you for any bad behaviour. For instance, if you punched your opponent in the nose you would just be thrown out immediately under 11.1  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2022-01-16. Score: 5
  
  No, you may not move that piece to another square even if you have not yet pressed your clock.
  
  From the FIDE Laws, art. 4.7.:
  
  When, as a legal move or part of a legal move, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move.
  
  (Art. 4.7 continues with further laws regarding captures, castling and promotion.)
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2022-01-16. Score: 5
  
  You didn't ask, but note "legal" in the answers: if you made an illegal move, and did not press the clock, you may and must change it, and usually (modulo §E11.5, "Do not distract your opponent in any way!") get scot-free. In German even the part on the board ("Zug ausgeführt") and on the clock ("Zug abgeschlossen") have different names in the FIDE rules to easily distinguish these actions (I didn't memorize the English names).
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_5**: In English the difference is between a move being "made" (let go of the piece) and "completed" (pressed the clock).  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2022-01-16. Score: 4
  
  It is not allowed to change your move: <https://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/LawsOfChess.pdf>
  
  "When, as a legal move or part of a legal move, a piece has been released on a square, it cannot be moved to another square on this move."
  
  
  ---
  
  