<p>Each and every thing in the environment is consists of a basic structure called <strong>Suddashtaka</strong>.And that is the smallest structure in the universe and each and every thing in the environment. Which  1 Suddashtaka is consists of 8 items.
They are...</p>

<ul>
<li>Patawi - like Hardness /solid </li>
<li>Aapoo - like water (like a liquid..it 'll flow) </li>
<li>Thejo - Hotness/Coldness</li>
<li>Waayo - air </li>
<li>Warna - Colour </li>
<li>Gandha - Smell </li>
<li>Rasa  - Taste </li>
<li>Ojah  - Some kind of energy</li>
</ul>

<p>And by connecting millions of Suddashtaka it creates an object (Human,House,Tree..etc)
According to the percentage which these items are available the object shows its behavior. </p>

<p>eg: If Patawi (Solidness) percentage is high the object is solid.</p>

<p>And each and every objects in this universe is vanishing (dying) and recreating (changing) trillions and trillions times (can't measure) withing a second. So that's why Buddha said each and everything in this universe is changing.</p>

<p>And if you need to find the end of the universe you must look in to your body. From there you can find the ultimate universal truth.Because each and every thing in this universe is consists of the above mentioned 8 items(Suddashtaka) </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T12:47:53.703Z
2015-05-07T12:47:53.703Z
tarzanbappa
<p>You could start by reading <a href="http://www.clear-vision.org/Schools/Students/Ages-17-18/natural-world/environment.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Buddhism and environmental issues</a> (which I found, just by doing a Google search for <code>Buddhism environment</code> and which is intended as an educational resource).</p>

<p>I have read it and I mostly agree with it as a good beginning.</p>

<p>It mentions the "first precept" (i.e. avoid killing) and the "second precept" (i.e. avoid taking what's not given) -- those are from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Precepts" rel="nofollow noreferrer">five precepts</a>, i.e. the more basic ethical rules for laypeople.</p>

<p>To that, I'd add that another place to look for ethical rules is in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path#Ethical_conduct" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Noble Eightfold Path</a>, of which three (i.e. speech, action, and livelihood) are to do with ethics again.</p>

<p>There aren't many <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path#Right_livelihood" rel="nofollow noreferrer">right livelihood rules</a> but among them is "Business in poison: producing or trading in any kind of poison or a toxic product designed to kill". I guess that a narrow view of that 'rule' might be that everything is alright except producing chemical warfare agents and pesticides. A much, much broader view might be to minimize 'pollution' of all kinds.</p>

<p>I think there's some justification or precedent for 'interpreting' Buddhism's ethical rules. For example, one of the precepts is literally against "fermented drink that causes heedlessness" but Buddhists today usually understand that as including all "recreational drugs and intoxicating beverages". The earliest Buddhist literature is from 2,500 years ago, which is before various problems of the modern world existed.</p>

<p>Note the second paragraph of "Buddhism and environmental issues": it says, "So, it should certainly not come as a shock to practising Buddhists to discover what environmentalists are now telling us." That's saying that environmentalists know more about the environment, these days, than is taught in Buddhist literature.</p>

<p>So perhaps you can look to Buddhist literature for generalities, or for hints on what attitude to have. I think that's what the Dalai Lama is doing when he gives <a href="http://www.dalailama.com/messages/environment/buddhist-concept-of-nature" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a speech like this one</a> which includes,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Since I deeply believe that basically human beings are of a gentle nature so I think the human attitude towards our environment should be gentle. Therefore I believe that not only should we keep our relationship with our other fellow human beings very gentle and non-violent, but it is also very important to extend that kind of attitude to the natural environment. I think morally speaking we can think like that and we should all be concerned for our environment.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>One of the central doctrines of Buddhism is that things are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_marks_of_existence#Annica" rel="nofollow noreferrer">impermanent</a>. I think it would be wrong, though, to interpret that as "nothing matters" ... to say for example, "Oh let's go ahead and kill on the elephants, what does it matter, everything is impermanent anyway" ... wrong because, as well as breaking the first precept (to avoid killing), there are other important Buddhist values including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmavihara" rel="nofollow noreferrer">loving-kindness and compassion</a>.</p>

<p>There are a few more things I think that maybe you could want to know.</p>

<ol>
<li>The quantity of Buddhist literature is vast. So your question, "what do buddhists religious texts say about the environment?" is a little bit like asking, "What do English-language scientific texts say about the environment?", i.e. it's difficult to summarize</li>
<li>Most of Buddhist literature focuses on topics other than 'the environment'.</li>
<li>There are several <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schools_of_Buddhism" rel="nofollow noreferrer">schools of Buddhism</a> (like there are many schools of Christianity). If you want to ask another question, one way to narrow it down would be to say whether you interested in the literature from a specific school, or from a specific time period: e.g. modern literature; medieval literature; or the earliest literature, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81li_Canon" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Pāli Canon</a> which is from about 2000 years ago.</li>
<li><p>There are separate (and stricter or more numerous) rules of behaviour for Buddhist monks: which are called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinaya" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Vinaya</a>. There's a bit of a symbiotic relationship between Buddhist monks and laypeople, for example monks shouldn't work for a living (shouldn't handle money) and laypeople should support them with gifts of food and other essentials (basically just food, a robe to wear, medicine when needed, and maybe a place to live). Someone who is living a monk's life (and a lot of Buddhist literature is by and perhaps for monks) might be unlikely to have a huge, negative environmental impact. This explanation of the <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html#harmlessness" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Vinaya rules on Harmlessness</a> says,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Throughout its history Buddhism has been renowned for its tolerance and compassion towards all living beings and this is reflected in the Buddhist monks' Vinaya. Their rules cover situations of causing harm ranging from murder — which is universally accepted as a crime — to such things as destroying plant life.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rules against <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html#veggie" rel="nofollow noreferrer">destroying vegetation</a> include even digging the ground...</p></li>
<li><p>When the historical Buddha lived and taught (2400 years ago) there were other religions ... which the Buddha probably learned before his enlightenment. One of these is called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Jainism</a>. I mention Jainism because it's practice of <em>Amhisa</em> (non-violence) is similar to or stricter than Buddhism's, even for laypeople; and because Jainism and Buddhism may have influenced each other, to some extent, historically.</p></li>
<li><p>You can also look for guidance from specific Buddhists, Buddhist teachers, modern-day Buddhist teachers, if not from Buddhism-in-general or "Buddhist religious texts". For example <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/2754/are-ecological-concerns-supported-explicitly-in-buddhism#comment3522_2754">in this comment</a>, Andrei said, "17th Karmapa is very vocal about ecological concerns, perhaps more than any other major Buddhist figurehead so far". And indeed a Google search for <code>17th Karmapa environment</code> returns many results, including for example <a href="http://kagyuoffice.org/buddhism-and-the-environment-living-in-harmony-with-the-planet/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Buddhism and the Environment: Living in Harmony with the Planet</a> from his own web site.</p></li>
</ol>

<hr>

<p>I hope that what I've written here is true, I hope it's not misleading. Two ways in which this isn't a good answer include,</p>

<ul>
<li>It references vocabulary but don't quote texts</li>
<li>It talks about ethics in general rather than environmentalism specifically</li>
<li>Asking about the Buddhism and the environment might be a bit like asking, "What does your sister write about football?" ... when, she doesn't actually write about football very much at all.</li>
</ul>

<p>In fact it seems to me that Buddhism writes more about people or 'the person' than it does about 'the environment'.</p>

<p>Some of the topics that are more central to Buddhism include the following -- perhaps you can see for yourself how these may be related to environmentalism:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>The 'four noble truths', of which:</p>

<ul>
<li>The first is that "Things are not satisfactory: you cannot get everything you might want, and you cannot keep everything you have."</li>
<li>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samudaya_sacca" rel="nofollow noreferrer">second</a> is that "The dissatisfaction is caused by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%E1%B9%87h%C4%81" rel="nofollow noreferrer">greed</a>."</li>
</ul></li>
<li><p>There's a '<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Way" rel="nofollow noreferrer">middle way</a>' which says that eternalism and annihilationism are, both, extremes</p></li>
<li><p>Being 'selfish' is problematic and unenlightened.</p></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T14:26:39.390Z
2015-05-07T17:00:02.253Z
2017-04-13T12:51:06.400Z
ChrisW
<p>My name is John and I am a grade 12 student living in Australia. I am currently in the process of doing research for a religion assignment. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T12:31:12.600Z
What do you mean by the enviornment?
tarzanbappa
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T13:08:02.240Z
@tarzanbappa He's surely asking about [Environmentalism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmentalism) and [Environmental protection](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_protection) i.e. "a practice of protecting the natural environment on individual, organizational or governmental levels, for the benefit of both the natural environment and humans. Due to the pressures of population and technology, the biophysical environment is being degraded, sometimes permanently. etc."
ChrisW
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T13:16:51.997Z
I appreciate OP's efforts at refining the question. However I think in this format it is a duplicate of http://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/2754/157 assuming he is asking about environment (green) issues which I think he is
Crab Bucket
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T21:05:13.057Z
John, this site (Buddhism.SE) doesn't have any specific policies on how to help with homework questions. There's a completely different site (named StackOverflow), which is for asking questions about software problems ... they put together [these suggestions](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10811/how-do-i-ask-and-answer-homework-questions?answertab=votes#tab-top) for how to ask and answer homework questions. You might find that interesting reading. Note some of the suggestions like, "attempt to solve the problem yourself first" and ...
ChrisW
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-07T21:07:40.153Z
... "ask about specific problems with your existing implementation". If you want to discuss how to best ask your questions, or discuss (help to define) this site's policy for homework questions, please feel free to post a new topic on [our 'meta' site](http://meta.buddhism.stackexchange.com/).
ChrisW
<ethics><texts>
What do Buddhists religious texts say about the environment?
# What do Buddhists religious texts say about the environment?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-07)

My name is username_0 and I am a grade 12 student living in Australia. I am currently in the process of doing research for a religion assignment.

**Tags:** ethics, texts

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What do you mean by the enviornment?  
> **username_2**: @username_1 He's surely asking about [Environmentalism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmentalism) and [Environmental protection](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_protection) i.e. "a practice of protecting the natural environment on individual, organizational or governmental levels, for the benefit of both the natural environment and humans. Due to the pressures of population and technology, the biophysical environment is being degraded, sometimes permanently. etc."  
> **username_3**: I appreciate OP's efforts at refining the question. However I think in this format it is a duplicate of http://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/2754/157 assuming he is asking about environment (green) issues which I think he is  
> **username_2**: username_0, this site (Buddhism.SE) doesn't have any specific policies on how to help with homework questions. There's a completely different site (named StackOverflow), which is for asking questions about software problems ... they put together [these suggestions](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10811/how-do-i-ask-and-answer-homework-questions?answertab=votes#tab-top) for how to ask and answer homework questions. You might find that interesting reading. Note some of the suggestions like, "attempt to solve the problem yourself first" and ...  
> **username_2**: ... "ask about specific problems with your existing implementation". If you want to discuss how to best ask your questions, or discuss (help to define) this site's policy for homework questions, please feel free to post a new topic on [our 'meta' site](http://meta.buddhism.stackexchange.com/).  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-05-07. Score: 5

You could start by reading [Buddhism and environmental issues](http://www.clear-vision.org/Schools/Students/Ages-17-18/natural-world/environment.aspx) (which I found, just by doing a Google search for `Buddhism environment` and which is intended as an educational resource).

I have read it and I mostly agree with it as a good beginning.

It mentions the "first precept" (i.e. avoid killing) and the "second precept" (i.e. avoid taking what's not given) -- those are from the [five precepts](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Precepts), i.e. the more basic ethical rules for laypeople.

To that, I'd add that another place to look for ethical rules is in the [Noble Eightfold Path](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path#Ethical_conduct), of which three (i.e. speech, action, and livelihood) are to do with ethics again.

There aren't many [right livelihood rules](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path#Right_livelihood) but among them is "Business in poison: producing or trading in any kind of poison or a toxic product designed to kill". I guess that a narrow view of that 'rule' might be that everything is alright except producing chemical warfare agents and pesticides. A much, much broader view might be to minimize 'pollution' of all kinds.

I think there's some justification or precedent for 'interpreting' Buddhism's ethical rules. For example, one of the precepts is literally against "fermented drink that causes heedlessness" but Buddhists today usually understand that as including all "recreational drugs and intoxicating beverages". The earliest Buddhist literature is from 2,500 years ago, which is before various problems of the modern world existed.

Note the second paragraph of "Buddhism and environmental issues": it says, "So, it should certainly not come as a shock to practising Buddhists to discover what environmentalists are now telling us." That's saying that environmentalists know more about the environment, these days, than is taught in Buddhist literature.

So perhaps you can look to Buddhist literature for generalities, or for hints on what attitude to have. I think that's what the Dalai Lama is doing when he gives [a speech like this one](http://www.dalailama.com/messages/environment/buddhist-concept-of-nature) which includes,

> Since I deeply believe that basically human beings are of a gentle nature so I think the human attitude towards our environment should be gentle. Therefore I believe that not only should we keep our relationship with our other fellow human beings very gentle and non-violent, but it is also very important to extend that kind of attitude to the natural environment. I think morally speaking we can think like that and we should all be concerned for our environment.

One of the central doctrines of Buddhism is that things are [impermanent](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_marks_of_existence#Annica). I think it would be wrong, though, to interpret that as "nothing matters" ... to say for example, "Oh let's go ahead and kill on the elephants, what does it matter, everything is impermanent anyway" ... wrong because, as well as breaking the first precept (to avoid killing), there are other important Buddhist values including [loving-kindness and compassion](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmavihara).

There are a few more things I think that maybe you could want to know.

1. The quantity of Buddhist literature is vast. So your question, "what do buddhists religious texts say about the environment?" is a little bit like asking, "What do English-language scientific texts say about the environment?", i.e. it's difficult to summarize
2. Most of Buddhist literature focuses on topics other than 'the environment'.
3. There are several [schools of Buddhism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schools_of_Buddhism) (like there are many schools of Christianity). If you want to ask another question, one way to narrow it down would be to say whether you interested in the literature from a specific school, or from a specific time period: e.g. modern literature; medieval literature; or the earliest literature, the [Pāli Canon](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81li_Canon) which is from about 2000 years ago.
4. There are separate (and stricter or more numerous) rules of behaviour for Buddhist monks: which are called the [Vinaya](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinaya). There's a bit of a symbiotic relationship between Buddhist monks and laypeople, for example monks shouldn't work for a living (shouldn't handle money) and laypeople should support them with gifts of food and other essentials (basically just food, a robe to wear, medicine when needed, and maybe a place to live). Someone who is living a monk's life (and a lot of Buddhist literature is by and perhaps for monks) might be unlikely to have a huge, negative environmental impact. This explanation of the [Vinaya rules on Harmlessness](http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html#harmlessness) says,

   > Throughout its history Buddhism has been renowned for its tolerance and compassion towards all living beings and this is reflected in the Buddhist monks' Vinaya. Their rules cover situations of causing harm ranging from murder — which is universally accepted as a crime — to such things as destroying plant life.

   Rules against [destroying vegetation](http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html#veggie) include even digging the ground...
5. When the historical Buddha lived and taught (2400 years ago) there were other religions ... which the Buddha probably learned before his enlightenment. One of these is called [Jainism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism). I mention Jainism because it's practice of *Amhisa* (non-violence) is similar to or stricter than Buddhism's, even for laypeople; and because Jainism and Buddhism may have influenced each other, to some extent, historically.
6. You can also look for guidance from specific Buddhists, Buddhist teachers, modern-day Buddhist teachers, if not from Buddhism-in-general or "Buddhist religious texts". For example [in this comment](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/2754/are-ecological-concerns-supported-explicitly-in-buddhism#comment3522_2754), Andrei said, "17th Karmapa is very vocal about ecological concerns, perhaps more than any other major Buddhist figurehead so far". And indeed a Google search for `17th Karmapa environment` returns many results, including for example [Buddhism and the Environment: Living in Harmony with the Planet](http://kagyuoffice.org/buddhism-and-the-environment-living-in-harmony-with-the-planet/) from his own web site.

---

I hope that what I've written here is true, I hope it's not misleading. Two ways in which this isn't a good answer include,

* It references vocabulary but don't quote texts
* It talks about ethics in general rather than environmentalism specifically
* Asking about the Buddhism and the environment might be a bit like asking, "What does your sister write about football?" ... when, she doesn't actually write about football very much at all.

In fact it seems to me that Buddhism writes more about people or 'the person' than it does about 'the environment'.

Some of the topics that are more central to Buddhism include the following -- perhaps you can see for yourself how these may be related to environmentalism:

* The 'four noble truths', of which:

  + The first is that "Things are not satisfactory: you cannot get everything you might want, and you cannot keep everything you have."
  + The [second](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samudaya_sacca) is that "The dissatisfaction is caused by [greed](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%E1%B9%87h%C4%81)."
* There's a '[middle way](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Way)' which says that eternalism and annihilationism are, both, extremes
* Being 'selfish' is problematic and unenlightened.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-05-07. Score: 1

Each and every thing in the environment is consists of a basic structure called **Suddashtaka**.And that is the smallest structure in the universe and each and every thing in the environment. Which 1 Suddashtaka is consists of 8 items.
They are...

* Patawi - like Hardness /solid
* Aapoo - like water (like a liquid..it 'll flow)
* Thejo - Hotness/Coldness
* Waayo - air
* Warna - Colour
* Gandha - Smell
* Rasa - Taste
* Ojah - Some kind of energy

And by connecting millions of Suddashtaka it creates an object (Human,House,Tree..etc)
According to the percentage which these items are available the object shows its behavior.

eg: If Patawi (Solidness) percentage is high the object is solid.

And each and every objects in this universe is vanishing (dying) and recreating (changing) trillions and trillions times (can't measure) withing a second. So that's why Buddha said each and everything in this universe is changing.

And if you need to find the end of the universe you must look in to your body. From there you can find the ultimate universal truth.Because each and every thing in this universe is consists of the above mentioned 8 items(Suddashtaka)


---

