<p>In my opinion, catharsis is a hindrance (non-meditaion) therefore not really related to Buddhism. Catharsis is a product of a deficiency in morality &amp; self-control (as explained in <a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/an10.61" rel="nofollow noreferrer">AN 10.61</a>). In other words, catharsis is a secular matter rather than a Buddhist matter.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>What is the nutriment for the five hindrances? It should be said: the three kinds of misconduct.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/an10.61" rel="nofollow noreferrer">AN 10.61</a></em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This said, in <a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/mn20" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MN 20</a>, it is taught as one of five methods that sometimes a person must let a hindrance arise to overcome it. Often emotions are so strong, they must be endured and allowed to arise &amp; run their course.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>If, while he is trying to forget those thoughts and is not giving attention to them, there still arise in him evil unwholesome thoughts connected with desire, with hate and with delusion, then he should give attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts. When he gives attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts, then any evil unwholesome thoughts connected with desire, with hate and with delusion are abandoned in him and subside. With the abandoning of them his mind becomes steadied internally, quieted, brought to singleness and concentrated. Just as a man walking fast might consider: ‘Why am I walking fast? What if I walk slowly?’ and he would walk slowly; then he might consider: ‘Why am I walking slowly? What if I stand?’ and he would stand; then he might consider: ‘Why am I standing? What if I sit?’ and he would sit; then he might consider: ‘Why am I sitting? What if I lie down?’ and he would lie down. By doing so he would <strong>substitute for each grosser posture (thought) one that was subtler</strong>. So too…when a bhikkhu gives attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts…his mind becomes steadied internally, quieted, brought to singleness, and concentrated.</em></p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T19:22:32.307Z
2017-07-25T20:29:47.263Z
2020-06-17T09:56:10.877Z
Dhamma Dhatu
<p>I mostly agree with Dhammadhatu's answer.</p>

<p>And, so far as I know, modern Western psychology too doesn't necessarily agree with "catharthis" (popularized by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharsis#Therapeutic_uses" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Freud</a> as a treatment for "hysteria") -- it may be that activity like screaming doesn't especially release anger, but may instead accustom/train/reward you for screaming.</p>

<p>You ask about "other traditions aside from Theravada", and I don't know, but the only thing I can think of that seems to me even vaguely related to catharsis are statements or attitudes associated with overcoming taboos: statements like, "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him"; or warnings against "the stink of Zen".</p>

<p>See also <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9595/254">this answer</a> as an example; though according to <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/9594/what-does-nonduality-correspond-to-in-buddhism/9595#comment36654_9595">this comment</a> I guess that's more to do with abandoning than embracing. Or <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/11510/254">this answer</a> on "attachments as obstacles to enlightenment".</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-10T11:45:27.547Z
2017-08-10T11:45:27.547Z
ChrisW
<p>Is it fine if you are mindful while doing it? Or did the Buddha denounce such practices as revelling or exaggerating emotions to provide temporary relief? I find that simply being mindful while repressing emotions has a tendency towards leading to passive aggressiveness.</p>

<p>To be specific, I mean actions like systematically screaming to release anger, systematically feeling to release sorrow... etc. Purposely releasing these mindstates and going over the top instead of repressing them. </p>

<p>What about other traditions aside from Therevada? Do they share a similar view towards catharsis, or is that not the case?</p>

<theravada><mahayana><psychology>
What is the general Buddhist consensus on catharsis?
# What is the general Buddhist consensus on catharsis?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-07-25)

Is it fine if you are mindful while doing it? Or did the Buddha denounce such practices as revelling or exaggerating emotions to provide temporary relief? I find that simply being mindful while repressing emotions has a tendency towards leading to passive aggressiveness.

To be specific, I mean actions like systematically screaming to release anger, systematically feeling to release sorrow... etc. Purposely releasing these mindstates and going over the top instead of repressing them.

What about other traditions aside from Therevada? Do they share a similar view towards catharsis, or is that not the case?

**Tags:** theravada, mahayana, psychology


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-07-25. Score: 3

In my opinion, catharsis is a hindrance (non-meditaion) therefore not really related to Buddhism. Catharsis is a product of a deficiency in morality & self-control (as explained in [AN 10.61](https://suttacentral.net/en/an10.61)). In other words, catharsis is a secular matter rather than a Buddhist matter.

> *What is the nutriment for the five hindrances? It should be said: the three kinds of misconduct.*
>
> *[AN 10.61](https://suttacentral.net/en/an10.61)*

This said, in [MN 20](https://suttacentral.net/en/mn20), it is taught as one of five methods that sometimes a person must let a hindrance arise to overcome it. Often emotions are so strong, they must be endured and allowed to arise & run their course.

> *If, while he is trying to forget those thoughts and is not giving attention to them, there still arise in him evil unwholesome thoughts connected with desire, with hate and with delusion, then he should give attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts. When he gives attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts, then any evil unwholesome thoughts connected with desire, with hate and with delusion are abandoned in him and subside. With the abandoning of them his mind becomes steadied internally, quieted, brought to singleness and concentrated. Just as a man walking fast might consider: ‘Why am I walking fast? What if I walk slowly?’ and he would walk slowly; then he might consider: ‘Why am I walking slowly? What if I stand?’ and he would stand; then he might consider: ‘Why am I standing? What if I sit?’ and he would sit; then he might consider: ‘Why am I sitting? What if I lie down?’ and he would lie down. By doing so he would **substitute for each grosser posture (thought) one that was subtler**. So too…when a bhikkhu gives attention to stilling the thought-formation of those thoughts…his mind becomes steadied internally, quieted, brought to singleness, and concentrated.*


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-08-10. Score: 0

I mostly agree with Dhammadhatu's answer.

And, so far as I know, modern Western psychology too doesn't necessarily agree with "catharthis" (popularized by [Freud](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharsis#Therapeutic_uses) as a treatment for "hysteria") -- it may be that activity like screaming doesn't especially release anger, but may instead accustom/train/reward you for screaming.

You ask about "other traditions aside from Theravada", and I don't know, but the only thing I can think of that seems to me even vaguely related to catharsis are statements or attitudes associated with overcoming taboos: statements like, "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him"; or warnings against "the stink of Zen".

See also [this answer](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9595/254) as an example; though according to [this comment](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/9594/what-does-nonduality-correspond-to-in-buddhism/9595#comment36654_9595) I guess that's more to do with abandoning than embracing. Or [this answer](https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/11510/254) on "attachments as obstacles to enlightenment".


---

