<p>There are two methods for seeing past lives:</p>

<ol>
<li>Through phenomena, and</li>
<li>Through time (or chronologically)</li>
</ol>

<p>The 'through phenomena' method is not exactly a method. It is more of a chance thing, but it is also easier. In this case, a sight (or other sense-stimulation) occurs and one has a deja vu experience ("I've done this before"), but without the doubt. At this time bending down the mind (or focusing on, or concentrating on) the feeling and the phenomena, a previous occasion when this phenomena occured will come to mind. If pressed further details will appear.</p>

<p>Then you will have to fight your programming and half the other Buddhists in the world who tell you that there is no such thing as rebirth and that you are just imagining things. Would that I had a mind with such an imaginative power!</p>

<p>The chronological method is by way of a yonisomanisikaro=like tracing back of the events of this life from the present moment back to birth, back through one's time in the womb, the time of one's conception, to the previous life. This is rightly an aspect of your setting up of mind (satipatthana). It is also exactly similar to Casteneda's Don Juan's 'recapitulation' method where you start in the present moment, and review every detail to extract yourself from all attachments found there and then move back in time. </p>

<p>More or less unrestricted chronological viewing Past Lives is one of three 'visions' that are obtained by the Arahant, but anyone can experience awareness of past life events through phenomena.</p>

<p>In Buddhist studies you will find that viewing past lives is to be accomplished from the fourth jhāna. But this is just the optimal method.</p>

<p>The formula for the Buddhist seeing past lives can be found in multiple suttas worded similarly to:</p>

<p>He recollects a variety of former habitations,
that is to say</p>

<p>One birth,
two births,
three births,
four births,
five births,
ten births,
twenty births,
thirty births,
forty births,
fifty births,
a hundred births,
a thousand births,
a hundred thousand births,
and many an eon of integration
and many an eon of disintegration
and many an eon of integration-disintegration:</p>

<p>'Such a one was I by name,
having such and such a clan,
such and such a colour,
so I was nourished,
such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
so did the span of life end.</p>

<p>Passing from this,
I came to be in another state
where I was such a one by name,
having such and such a clan,
such and such a colour,
so I was nourished,
such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
so did the span of life end.</p>

<p>Passing from this,
I arose here.'</p>

<p>Thus he recollects divers former habitations
in all their modes and detail.</p>

<p>A helpful and cautionary Sutta which discusses the method for this and other powers is AN 9.35 (Hare's translation linked-to here:)
<a href="http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/an/09_nines/an09.035.hare.pts.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/an/09_nines/an09.035.hare.pts.htm</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-09T16:11:42.627Z
2019-06-09T16:11:42.627Z
Mike Olds
<p>Dhammadhatu's response should not have been downgraded. It is also a correct answer to the question. It does appear as though the intent was to carp rather than teach as concerns differentiating the use of 'lives' vs. 'abodes' (we are told in many places, e.g. SN I, 1.25,
<a href="http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/01_sagv/sn01.01.021-030.rhyc.pts.htm#sn.1.1.25" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/01_sagv/sn01.01.021-030.rhyc.pts.htm#sn.1.1.25</a>
that understanding the distinction, we may use conventional speech - how many here would understand the question if asked in terms of 'abodes'?), but the fact remains that the sutta cited is instructive. Without recognition that it is past identification with the khandhas that is being spoken of when one speaks of having recollected a past 'abode', the practice would be going in the direction of ego-building - 'proneness to notions of a self or soul'.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-10T14:26:52.860Z
2019-06-10T14:26:52.860Z
Mike Olds
<p>ajahn brahm has a few videos as QA on this</p>

<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4BFX_qhhyk" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4BFX_qhhyk</a></p>

<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGo0NbOROFY" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGo0NbOROFY</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-11T07:36:25.103Z
2019-06-11T07:36:25.103Z
user12901
<p>In original Pali Buddhism, there is no such thing as "recollecting past lives". The Pali term wrongly translated as "past lives" is "<a href="https://suttacentral.net/define/pubbeniv%C4%81sa" rel="nofollow noreferrer">pubbenivāsa</a>", which literally means "past dwellings" or "past abodes". </p>

<p>Therefore, in original Buddhism, "recollecting past abodes" literally means recollecting in the past when the mind mistakenly or ignorantly clung to one or more of the five aggregates as "self". </p>

<p>In original Buddhism, the word "birth" ("jati") means to create the idea of a "self" or "a being", either internally or externally. When the Buddha recollected his myriad past abodes &amp; births, he recollected each time in the past the wrong view of "self" arose in his formerly ignorant mind.</p>

<p>In conclusion, the Buddhist practise of "recollecting past abodes" is literally explained &amp; described in the sutta <a href="https://suttacentral.net/sn22.79/en/bodhi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SN 22.79</a> (as translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi). It literally means recollecting in the past when the mind mistakenly or ignorantly clung to one or more of the five aggregates as "self".</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-09T23:25:24.130Z
2019-06-09T23:31:13.533Z
2019-06-09T23:31:13.533Z
Dhamma Dhatu
<p>Is there anyone knows and has experience in past life regression? How can I do to recall my past life memory? Thank you.</p>

<past-lives>
Past life regression techniques
# Past life regression techniques

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-06-09)

Is there anyone knows and has experience in past life regression? How can I do to recall my past life memory? Thank you.

**Tags:** past-lives


---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-06-09. Score: 3

There are two methods for seeing past lives:

1. Through phenomena, and
2. Through time (or chronologically)

The 'through phenomena' method is not exactly a method. It is more of a chance thing, but it is also easier. In this case, a sight (or other sense-stimulation) occurs and one has a deja vu experience ("I've done this before"), but without the doubt. At this time bending down the mind (or focusing on, or concentrating on) the feeling and the phenomena, a previous occasion when this phenomena occured will come to mind. If pressed further details will appear.

Then you will have to fight your programming and half the other Buddhists in the world who tell you that there is no such thing as rebirth and that you are just imagining things. Would that I had a mind with such an imaginative power!

The chronological method is by way of a yonisomanisikaro=like tracing back of the events of this life from the present moment back to birth, back through one's time in the womb, the time of one's conception, to the previous life. This is rightly an aspect of your setting up of mind (satipatthana). It is also exactly similar to Casteneda's Don Juan's 'recapitulation' method where you start in the present moment, and review every detail to extract yourself from all attachments found there and then move back in time.

More or less unrestricted chronological viewing Past Lives is one of three 'visions' that are obtained by the Arahant, but anyone can experience awareness of past life events through phenomena.

In Buddhist studies you will find that viewing past lives is to be accomplished from the fourth jhāna. But this is just the optimal method.

The formula for the Buddhist seeing past lives can be found in multiple suttas worded similarly to:

He recollects a variety of former habitations,
that is to say

One birth,
two births,
three births,
four births,
five births,
ten births,
twenty births,
thirty births,
forty births,
fifty births,
a hundred births,
a thousand births,
a hundred thousand births,
and many an eon of integration
and many an eon of disintegration
and many an eon of integration-disintegration:

'Such a one was I by name,
having such and such a clan,
such and such a colour,
so I was nourished,
such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
so did the span of life end.

Passing from this,
I came to be in another state
where I was such a one by name,
having such and such a clan,
such and such a colour,
so I was nourished,
such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
so did the span of life end.

Passing from this,
I arose here.'

Thus he recollects divers former habitations
in all their modes and detail.

A helpful and cautionary Sutta which discusses the method for this and other powers is AN 9.35 (Hare's translation linked-to here:)
<http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/an/09_nines/an09.035.hare.pts.htm>


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-06-10. Score: 0

Dhammadhatu's response should not have been downgraded. It is also a correct answer to the question. It does appear as though the intent was to carp rather than teach as concerns differentiating the use of 'lives' vs. 'abodes' (we are told in many places, e.g. SN I, 1.25,
<http://buddhadust.net/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/01_sagv/sn01.01.021-030.rhyc.pts.htm#sn.1.1.25>
that understanding the distinction, we may use conventional speech - how many here would understand the question if asked in terms of 'abodes'?), but the fact remains that the sutta cited is instructive. Without recognition that it is past identification with the khandhas that is being spoken of when one speaks of having recollected a past 'abode', the practice would be going in the direction of ego-building - 'proneness to notions of a self or soul'.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-06-11. Score: 0

ajahn brahm has a few videos as QA on this

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4BFX_qhhyk>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGo0NbOROFY>


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-06-09. Score: -2

In original Pali Buddhism, there is no such thing as "recollecting past lives". The Pali term wrongly translated as "past lives" is "[pubbenivāsa](https://suttacentral.net/define/pubbeniv%C4%81sa)", which literally means "past dwellings" or "past abodes".

Therefore, in original Buddhism, "recollecting past abodes" literally means recollecting in the past when the mind mistakenly or ignorantly clung to one or more of the five aggregates as "self".

In original Buddhism, the word "birth" ("jati") means to create the idea of a "self" or "a being", either internally or externally. When the Buddha recollected his myriad past abodes & births, he recollected each time in the past the wrong view of "self" arose in his formerly ignorant mind.

In conclusion, the Buddhist practise of "recollecting past abodes" is literally explained & described in the sutta [SN 22.79](https://suttacentral.net/sn22.79/en/bodhi) (as translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi). It literally means recollecting in the past when the mind mistakenly or ignorantly clung to one or more of the five aggregates as "self".


---

