<p>In <a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/dn9" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DN 9</a>, the Buddha advised not to speculate on certain types of questions:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that the cosmos is eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”</p>
<p>“Then is it the case that the cosmos is not eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless?”</p>
<p>“Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that the cosmos is not eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”</p>
<p>“Then is it the case that the cosmos is finite … the cosmos is infinite … the soul &amp; the body are the same … the soul is one thing and the body another … after death a Tathagata exists … after death a Tathagata does not exist … after death a Tathagata both exists &amp; does not exist … after death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless?”</p>
<p>“Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that after death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”</p>
<p>“But why hasn’t the Blessed One expounded these things?”</p>
<p>“Because they are not conducive to the goal, are not conducive to the Dhamma, are not basic to the holy life. They don’t lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, to Unbinding. That’s why I haven’t expounded them.”</p>
<p>“And what has the Blessed One expounded?”</p>
<p>“I have expounded that, ‘This is stress’ … ‘This is the origination of stress’ … ‘This is the cessation of stress’ … ‘This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress.’</p>
<p>“And why has the Blessed One expounded these things?”</p>
<p>“Because they are conducive to the goal, conducive to the Dhamma, and basic to the holy life. They lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, to Unbinding. That’s why I have expounded them.”</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-13T00:22:21.773Z
2016-02-13T00:39:38.273Z
2020-06-17T09:56:10.877Z
santa100
<p>There is no mention of the number of being in lower realms hence there is a possibility that in a given universe there are infinite beings. Also the number of universes are infinite hence even if there are finite being in a world system the infinity of world systems will make the number of being infinite. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T05:55:15.130Z
2016-02-12T05:55:15.130Z
Suminda Sirinath S. Dharmasena
<p>I am a being. So are you. According to Buddhism there is not soul and maybe there is nothing called myself which makes this a very tough question to ask. I am living my sansara. A never ending thought processes taking different forms (Human, Deva etc). This thought process or sansara does not overlap with any others or does not branch out. My theory is that the total number of beings (may not be the best word to use) or sansaras of different thought processes (again maybe wrong use of terminology but I hope you get the picture) does not change unless someone attains nibbhana/ becomes an arahath. Is this correct? or can it reduce without it being due to the passing of an arahath? Can it by any chance increase? </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-11T19:21:22.203Z
Consider the possibility that the universe is infinite, hence the number of beings are also infinite. (Infinity - 1) is still infinity
Sankha Kulathantille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T01:59:50.193Z
I highly doubt infinity exists in the physical world. If it is infinite then there is no possibility of talking about an increase or a decrease.
Donald Edwards
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T02:02:15.297Z
The number of humans is finite, the number of animals is also finite even if we cannot say the exact value. Scriptures say approximately the number of devas that existed those days as well. So I cannot see how you can say its infinite
Donald Edwards
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T02:40:14.380Z
i.e the number of devas in this world system. But the scriptures don't say that the number of world systems are finite.
Sankha Kulathantille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T03:35:50.947Z
@SankhaKulathantille So according to you there can be infinitely many world systems. And in each world systems there may have been Buddhas as well. And maybe even two Buddhas existed simultaneously in two different world systems? (I don't know whether the world "simultaneously" makes sense when comparing two world systems)
Heisenberg
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T03:51:05.257Z
@Heisenberg as I've heard, the Buddhas only appear in "Magul Sakwala". In today's terms it corresponds to the milky way. So it's unlikely that there are more than one Buddhas at a time. If you ask this as a separate question, you might get more information/opinions
Sankha Kulathantille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T03:52:13.840Z
That's interesting. Will come up with a question in a while
Heisenberg
<nirvana><wheel-of-life>
Total number of beings in the entire space as we know is constant? Increases? Decreases?
# Total number of beings in the entire space as we know is constant? Increases? Decreases?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-02-11)

I am a being. So are you. According to Buddhism there is not soul and maybe there is nothing called myself which makes this a very tough question to ask. I am living my sansara. A never ending thought processes taking different forms (Human, Deva etc). This thought process or sansara does not overlap with any others or does not branch out. My theory is that the total number of beings (may not be the best word to use) or sansaras of different thought processes (again maybe wrong use of terminology but I hope you get the picture) does not change unless someone attains nibbhana/ becomes an arahath. Is this correct? or can it reduce without it being due to the passing of an arahath? Can it by any chance increase?

**Tags:** nirvana, wheel-of-life

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Consider the possibility that the universe is infinite, hence the number of beings are also infinite. (Infinity - 1) is still infinity  
> **username_0**: I highly doubt infinity exists in the physical world. If it is infinite then there is no possibility of talking about an increase or a decrease.  
> **username_0**: The number of humans is finite, the number of animals is also finite even if we cannot say the exact value. Scriptures say approximately the number of devas that existed those days as well. So I cannot see how you can say its infinite  
> **username_1**: i.e the number of devas in this world system. But the scriptures don't say that the number of world systems are finite.  
> **username_2**: @SankhaKulathantille So according to you there can be infinitely many world systems. And in each world systems there may have been Buddhas as well. And maybe even two Buddhas existed simultaneously in two different world systems? (I don't know whether the world "simultaneously" makes sense when comparing two world systems)  
> **username_1**: @username_2 as I've heard, the Buddhas only appear in "Magul Sakwala". In today's terms it corresponds to the milky way. So it's unlikely that there are more than one Buddhas at a time. If you ask this as a separate question, you might get more information/opinions  
> **username_2**: That's interesting. Will come up with a question in a while  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-02-13. Score: 1

In [DN 9](https://suttacentral.net/en/dn9), the Buddha advised not to speculate on certain types of questions:

> “Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that the cosmos is eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”
>
> “Then is it the case that the cosmos is not eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless?”
>
> “Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that the cosmos is not eternal, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”
>
> “Then is it the case that the cosmos is finite … the cosmos is infinite … the soul & the body are the same … the soul is one thing and the body another … after death a Tathagata exists … after death a Tathagata does not exist … after death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist … after death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless?”
>
> “Potthapada, I haven’t expounded that after death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist, that only this is true and anything otherwise is worthless.”
>
> “But why hasn’t the Blessed One expounded these things?”
>
> “Because they are not conducive to the goal, are not conducive to the Dhamma, are not basic to the holy life. They don’t lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, to Unbinding. That’s why I haven’t expounded them.”
>
> “And what has the Blessed One expounded?”
>
> “I have expounded that, ‘This is stress’ … ‘This is the origination of stress’ … ‘This is the cessation of stress’ … ‘This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress.’
>
> “And why has the Blessed One expounded these things?”
>
> “Because they are conducive to the goal, conducive to the Dhamma, and basic to the holy life. They lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, to Unbinding. That’s why I have expounded them.”


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2016-02-12. Score: 0

There is no mention of the number of being in lower realms hence there is a possibility that in a given universe there are infinite beings. Also the number of universes are infinite hence even if there are finite being in a world system the infinity of world systems will make the number of being infinite.


---

