<p>It depends somewhat on what you mean by a Buddhist text. The book of “Barlaam and Josephat” is a famous Christian reworking of the life of the Buddha. It was translated from Latin to Middle English in the 15th century.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-05T18:47:30.360Z
2014-09-05T18:47:30.360Z
fdb
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ndor_K%C5%91r%C3%B6si_Csoma" rel="nofollow">Sándor Csoma de Kőrös</a> (Hungarian: Kőrösi Csoma Sándor) was a Hungarian-Szekler orientalist who went to Asia around 1820 looking for the ancestors of Hungarians, but ended up in Tibet instead.  He is well known among Hungarians for his journey and for compiling <a href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=a78IAAAAQAAJ&amp;dq=csoma&amp;pg=PR1#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow">the first Tibetan-English dictionary and grammar</a>.</p>

<p>He spent considerable time in Tibet studying Tibetan and Buddhist philosophy between 1827-30. He was declared Boddhisatva in 1933 in Japan.</p>

<p>While I do not know if he translated Buddhist texts into English, it is plausible that he may have, as he immersed himself in Buddhism.  Unfortunately it is unlikely that this will be easy to research on the internet, you may need to go to dusty old libraries to get definitive information ;-)  Nevertheless, I thought that this was a good <em>lead</em> which is worth mentioning (since the dates are similar but a bit earlier than in the other answers).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-06T01:08:21.657Z
Max Müller, in Buddhist Mahâyâna Texts Part II (SBE vol. 49), says (Intro., xiii) that an "account of the Tibetan translation" of the Diamond Sutra "was given as far back as 1836 by Csoma Körösi in his Analysis of the Sher-chiu, the second division of the Kanjur, published in the Asiatic Researches, vol. xx, p. 393 seq."  The text [may be found online](https://archive.org/stream/asiaticresearche201836cal/asiaticresearche201836cal_djvu.txt), albeit in a poorly OCR'd form.
hardmath
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-06T04:25:59.183Z
@hardmath That's interesting, thanks for the pointer!
Csomakőrös
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-05T23:53:58.460Z
2014-09-05T23:53:58.460Z
Csomakőrös
<p>Some of the earliest translations are covered in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Books_of_the_East" rel="nofollow">Sacred Books of the East</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhammapada" rel="nofollow">Dhammapada</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_M%C3%BCller" rel="nofollow">Max Müller</a> based on a Latin translation by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viggo_Fausb%C3%B6ll" rel="nofollow">Viggo Fausböll</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutta_Nipata" rel="nofollow">Sutta-Nipata</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viggo_Fausb%C3%B6ll" rel="nofollow">Viggo Fausböll</a>) series by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_M%C3%BCller" rel="nofollow">Max Müller</a> in which some of the books are Buddhist books as per the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theravada" rel="nofollow">Theravada tradition</a>.</p>

<p>More notable translation work (in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theravada" rel="nofollow">Theravada tradition</a>) has been done by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_William_Rhys_Davids" rel="nofollow">Thomas William Rhys Davids</a> who founded the  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pali_Text_Society" rel="nofollow">Pali Text Society</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-05T14:33:01.733Z
2014-09-05T15:55:36.417Z
2014-09-05T15:55:36.417Z
Suminda Sirinath S. Dharmasena
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>:</p>
<p>These seem to be the first Buddhist texts ever translated into English, published in 1693:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001/1:11.1?rgn=div2;view=fulltext" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>THE LIFE OF THEVETAT</em>, Translated from the Balie</a> (i.e. Pāli)</li>
<li><a href="https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001/1:11.2?rgn=div2;view=fulltext" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>An Explication of the Patimouc, or Text of the Vinac</em></a></li>
</ul>
<p>More information can be found in <em><a href="https://ahandfulofleaves.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/a-philological-approach-to-buddhism_norman_tbf_1997.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">A philological approach to Buddhism</a></em> by K. R. Norman, p. 4:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Simon de La Loubère [...] in 1687-88 went to Siam as an envoy of
the king of France (King Louis), and on his return wrote a book about the
Kingdom of Siam, which was published in France in 1691. Two years later an
English translation was published in England. La Loubère gave a fascinating
account of many aspects of Siam and Siamese culture, and he also included an
account of the Siamese religion — Buddhism — and the sacred language of the
Siamese. He noted the differences between that language, which he called Balie,
and the Siamese language, and noted, correctly, the relationship between the
former and Sanskrit. He also gave French translations of a few Buddhist texts.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here is the English edition of Loubère's whole book, which contains the above-mentioned texts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001?view=toc" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>A new historical relation of the kingdom of Siam</em> by Monsieur De La Loubere ...; done out of French, by A.P. Gen. R.S.S.</a> London: Printed by F.L for Tho. Horne ... Francis Saunders ... and Tho. Bennet ..., 1693.</li>
</ul>
<p>Some other translations that can be regarded as quite early, include:</p>
<ul>
<li><p><a href="https://books.google.pl/books?id=7IJVAAAAcAAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;hl=no&amp;source=gbs_ge_summary_r&amp;cad=0#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>The History and Doctrine of Budhism</em>: Popularly Illustrated: with Notices of the Kappooism, Or Demon Worship, and of the Bali, Or Planetary Incantations, of Ceylon</a> by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Upham" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Edward Upham</a> (London, 1829): contains translations of some Jātakas</p>
</li>
<li><p><a href="https://openlibrary.org/books/OL23285051M/The_Catechism_of_the_shamans_or_The_laws_and_regulations_of_the_priesthood_of_Buddha_in_China" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>The Catechism of the Shamans</em></a> (London, 1831) by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;page=1&amp;rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3ACharles%20Fried.%20Neumann" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Charles Fried. Neumann</a>: contains translation of portions of a Mahāyāna Vinaya from Chinese</p>
</li>
<li><p><a href="https://books.google.pl/books?id=VnsAAAAAYAAJ&amp;q=peabody&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q=%22white%20lotus%22&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Fragment of the <em>Lotus Sutra</em></a> translated from French by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Peabody" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Elizabeth Peabody</a> in 1844 (Wikipedia incorrectly calls that the first English translation of a Buddhist text)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>None of these publications seem to have made a big impact.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In 1844 the magazine published Peabody's translation of a portion of the Lotus Sutra from French [...]. The publication ceased shortly thereafter in April 1844.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-01T02:07:12.173Z
Very cool story about Devadatta (Thevetat), thoroughly enjoyed it!
Andriy Volkov
CC BY-SA 4.0
2014-09-05T14:51:38.700Z
2020-09-02T23:42:47.560Z
2020-09-02T23:42:47.560Z
kami
<p>As to the first <em>notable</em> translation, I would give this honorary title to <strong>Max Muller's translation of Dhammappada</strong>, first published in <strong>1869</strong>, later included in Muller's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Books_of_the_East" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><strong>Sacred Books of the East</strong></a> series published around <strong>1880s</strong>.</p>
<p>Beside Dhammapada, the series included important suttas such as Setting the Wheel of Dhamma in Motion, Mahaparinibbana, and others, all of Sutta-Nipata, most of Vinaya, one of the earliest post-canonical texts Milinda-panha, a Chinese version of the Life of Buddha by Asvaghosa, and some of the most important Mahayana texts such as Heart Sutra and Lotus Sutra.</p>
<p>Arguably this was the most <em>notable</em> early publication of Buddhist texts into English.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2014-09-05T15:32:15.023Z
2020-09-02T23:35:26.817Z
2020-09-02T23:35:26.817Z
Andriy Volkov
<p>What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English? When was it translated and by whom? Was it reasonably available to those interested and did it have much of an impact within academic circles and perhaps to the wider culture?</p>

<history><texts>
What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English?
# What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-09-05)

What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English? When was it translated and by whom? Was it reasonably available to those interested and did it have much of an impact within academic circles and perhaps to the wider culture?

**Tags:** history, texts


---

## 5 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2014-09-05. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

**UPDATE**:

These seem to be the first Buddhist texts ever translated into English, published in 1693:

* [*THE LIFE OF THEVETAT*, Translated from the Balie](https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001/1:11.1?rgn=div2;view=fulltext) (i.e. Pāli)
* [*An Explication of the Patimouc, or Text of the Vinac*](https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001/1:11.2?rgn=div2;view=fulltext)

More information can be found in *[A philological approach to Buddhism](https://ahandfulofleaves.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/a-philological-approach-to-buddhism_norman_tbf_1997.pdf)* by K. R. Norman, p. 4:

> Simon de La Loubère [...] in 1687-88 went to Siam as an envoy of
> the king of France (King Louis), and on his return wrote a book about the
> Kingdom of Siam, which was published in France in 1691. Two years later an
> English translation was published in England. La Loubère gave a fascinating
> account of many aspects of Siam and Siamese culture, and he also included an
> account of the Siamese religion — Buddhism — and the sacred language of the
> Siamese. He noted the differences between that language, which he called Balie,
> and the Siamese language, and noted, correctly, the relationship between the
> former and Sanskrit. He also gave French translations of a few Buddhist texts.

Here is the English edition of Loubère's whole book, which contains the above-mentioned texts:

* [*A new historical relation of the kingdom of Siam* by Monsieur De La Loubere ...; done out of French, by A.P. Gen. R.S.S.](https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A48403.0001.001?view=toc) London: Printed by F.L for Tho. Horne ... Francis Saunders ... and Tho. Bennet ..., 1693.

Some other translations that can be regarded as quite early, include:

* [*The History and Doctrine of Budhism*: Popularly Illustrated: with Notices of the Kappooism, Or Demon Worship, and of the Bali, Or Planetary Incantations, of Ceylon](https://books.google.pl/books?id=7IJVAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=no&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false) by [Edward Upham](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Upham) (London, 1829): contains translations of some Jātakas
* [*The Catechism of the Shamans*](https://openlibrary.org/books/OL23285051M/The_Catechism_of_the_shamans_or_The_laws_and_regulations_of_the_priesthood_of_Buddha_in_China) (London, 1831) by [Charles Fried. Neumann](http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3ACharles%20Fried.%20Neumann): contains translation of portions of a Mahāyāna Vinaya from Chinese
* [Fragment of the *Lotus Sutra*](https://books.google.pl/books?id=VnsAAAAAYAAJ&q=peabody&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22white%20lotus%22&f=false) translated from French by [Elizabeth Peabody](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Peabody) in 1844 (Wikipedia incorrectly calls that the first English translation of a Buddhist text)

None of these publications seem to have made a big impact.

> In 1844 the magazine published Peabody's translation of a portion of the Lotus Sutra from French [...]. The publication ceased shortly thereafter in April 1844.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: Very cool story about Devadatta (Thevetat), thoroughly enjoyed it!  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2014-09-05. Score: 4

As to the first *notable* translation, I would give this honorary title to **Max Muller's translation of Dhammappada**, first published in **1869**, later included in Muller's [**Sacred Books of the East**](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Books_of_the_East) series published around **1880s**.

Beside Dhammapada, the series included important suttas such as Setting the Wheel of Dhamma in Motion, Mahaparinibbana, and others, all of Sutta-Nipata, most of Vinaya, one of the earliest post-canonical texts Milinda-panha, a Chinese version of the Life of Buddha by Asvaghosa, and some of the most important Mahayana texts such as Heart Sutra and Lotus Sutra.

Arguably this was the most *notable* early publication of Buddhist texts into English.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2014-09-05. Score: 3

It depends somewhat on what you mean by a Buddhist text. The book of “Barlaam and Josephat” is a famous Christian reworking of the life of the Buddha. It was translated from Latin to Middle English in the 15th century.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-09-05. Score: 2

[Sándor Csoma de Kőrös](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ndor_K%C5%91r%C3%B6si_Csoma) (Hungarian: Kőrösi Csoma Sándor) was a Hungarian-Szekler orientalist who went to Asia around 1820 looking for the ancestors of Hungarians, but ended up in Tibet instead. He is well known among Hungarians for his journey and for compiling [the first Tibetan-English dictionary and grammar](http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=a78IAAAAQAAJ&dq=csoma&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false).

He spent considerable time in Tibet studying Tibetan and Buddhist philosophy between 1827-30. He was declared Boddhisatva in 1933 in Japan.

While I do not know if he translated Buddhist texts into English, it is plausible that he may have, as he immersed himself in Buddhism. Unfortunately it is unlikely that this will be easy to research on the internet, you may need to go to dusty old libraries to get definitive information ;-) Nevertheless, I thought that this was a good *lead* which is worth mentioning (since the dates are similar but a bit earlier than in the other answers).

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Max Müller, in Buddhist Mahâyâna Texts Part II (SBE vol. 49), says (Intro., xiii) that an "account of the Tibetan translation" of the Diamond Sutra "was given as far back as 1836 by Csoma Körösi in his Analysis of the Sher-chiu, the second division of the Kanjur, published in the Asiatic Researches, vol. xx, p. 393 seq."  The text [may be found online](https://archive.org/stream/asiaticresearche201836cal/asiaticresearche201836cal_djvu.txt), albeit in a poorly OCR'd form.  
> **username_2**: @username_3 That's interesting, thanks for the pointer!  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2014-09-05. Score: 1

Some of the earliest translations are covered in the [Sacred Books of the East](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Books_of_the_East) ([Dhammapada](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhammapada) by [Max Müller](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_M%C3%BCller) based on a Latin translation by [Viggo Fausböll](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viggo_Fausb%C3%B6ll) and [Sutta-Nipata](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutta_Nipata) by [Viggo Fausböll](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viggo_Fausb%C3%B6ll)) series by [Max Müller](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_M%C3%BCller) in which some of the books are Buddhist books as per the [Theravada tradition](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theravada).

More notable translation work (in the [Theravada tradition](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theravada)) has been done by [Thomas William Rhys Davids](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_William_Rhys_Davids) who founded the [Pali Text Society](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pali_Text_Society).


---

