<p>Given that text, I would rule that you could move <em>either</em> a person or a hut, and the ruling about sacrifice tokens applies to <em>both</em>.</p>

<p>If they had only intended the hut to have the sacrifice token clause, they should have written it as:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Move an opponent's hut (with or without sacrifice token), or move a person, up to 3 hexes from its current location.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-11-28T22:58:51.133Z
That's how we play it.
Lance Roberts
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-11-29T13:55:58.980Z
Alternatively you could argue that they'd have left the parentheses away if they wanted no distinction...
Kempeth
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-11-28T17:34:06.887Z
2011-01-12T12:22:42.307Z
2011-01-12T12:22:42.307Z
LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir
<p>I don't have the English card text ready but the German one translates roughly like this:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Move an opponents person or hut (with or without sacrifice token) up to 3 hexes from it's current location.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Can I move an opponents person which carries a sacrifice token with this card or can I only move the bare person?</p>

<p>Considering the parentheses I'd say that the part about sacrifice tokens moved along only applies to the huts...</p>

<untagged>
Expulsion Card ruling in Mesopotamia
Kempeth
# Expulsion Card ruling in Mesopotamia

(Asked by: username_0 on 2010-11-28)

I don't have the English card text ready but the German one translates roughly like this:

> Move an opponents person or hut (with or without sacrifice token) up to 3 hexes from it's current location.

Can I move an opponents person which carries a sacrifice token with this card or can I only move the bare person?

Considering the parentheses I'd say that the part about sacrifice tokens moved along only applies to the huts...

**Tags:** untagged


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2010-11-28. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Given that text, I would rule that you could move *either* a person or a hut, and the ruling about sacrifice tokens applies to *both*.

If they had only intended the hut to have the sacrifice token clause, they should have written it as:

> Move an opponent's hut (with or without sacrifice token), or move a person, up to 3 hexes from its current location.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: That's how we play it.  
> **username_0**: Alternatively you could argue that they'd have left the parentheses away if they wanted no distinction...  

---

