<p>Yes, the card can be blocked. The card would count as a creature, that in this situation, is attacking. Unless you decided to enchant it or use a spell that causes otherwise, the land <em>would</em> be able to be blocked, as well as block.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T23:03:20.960Z
I think maybe you missed the part of the question where the Nature's Revolt, which is making the land a creature in the first place, is destroyed after attackers are declared.
murgatroid99
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-21T12:35:00.250Z
The idea of the question is that the land STOPS being a creature before blockers are declared. Could you maybe consider editing or deleting this answer due to irrelevancy?
CollinB
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T22:50:43.873Z
2019-11-20T22:50:43.873Z
Human Thing
<p>The mountain will be removed from combat; which means it stops attacking, blocking, etc.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>506.4. A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it’s a planeswalker that’s being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it’s an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) <strong>or stops being a creature.</strong> <strong>A creature that’s removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature.</strong> A planeswalker that’s removed from combat stops being attacked.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:45:16.203Z
Question has been edited by the asker. Please edit your response to accomodate the edits, as this one is no longer relevant to the question
CollinB
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:46:26.743Z
I feel like changes the question enough that it should be asked as a separate question; and this one rolled back....
GendoIkari
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:47:26.423Z
Hmmmmm.... Probably true. Even so, shouldn't you still get rid of the answer if it is no longer relevant to the existing question?
CollinB
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:48:47.617Z
Since the question was edited so soon after asking; I've just gone ahead and updated my answer to answer the new question.
GendoIkari
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:49:46.153Z
Seems fair enough :D
CollinB
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-11-20T18:40:59.520Z
2019-11-20T18:47:59.887Z
2019-11-20T18:47:59.887Z
GendoIkari
<p>The card <a class="mtg-autocard" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bNature%27s%5d%2b%5bRevolt%5d">Nature&#39;s Revolt</a> is out, then a mountain and is declared as an attacker, then the enchantment is destroyed.</p>

<p>What happens to the mountain? Is it still attacking, can it be blocked e.t.c.</p>

<magic-the-gathering>
What happens when a land attacks then stops being a creature?
Phyrex
# What happens when a land attacks then stops being a creature?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-11-20)

The card [Nature's Revolt](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bNature%27s%5d%2b%5bRevolt%5d) is out, then a mountain and is declared as an attacker, then the enchantment is destroyed.

What happens to the mountain? Is it still attacking, can it be blocked e.t.c.

**Tags:** magic-the-gathering


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2019-11-20. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

The mountain will be removed from combat; which means it stops attacking, blocking, etc.

> 506.4. A permanent is removed from combat if it leaves the battlefield, if its controller changes, if it phases out, if an effect specifically removes it from combat, if it’s a planeswalker that’s being attacked and stops being a planeswalker, or if it’s an attacking or blocking creature that regenerates (see rule 701.14) **or stops being a creature.** **A creature that’s removed from combat stops being an attacking, blocking, blocked, and/or unblocked creature.** A planeswalker that’s removed from combat stops being attacked.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Question has been edited by the asker. Please edit your response to accomodate the edits, as this one is no longer relevant to the question  
> **username_4**: I feel like changes the question enough that it should be asked as a separate question; and this one rolled back....  
> **username_3**: Hmmmmm.... Probably true. Even so, shouldn't you still get rid of the answer if it is no longer relevant to the existing question?  
> **username_4**: Since the question was edited so soon after asking; I've just gone ahead and updated my answer to answer the new question.  
> **username_3**: Seems fair enough :D  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-11-20. Score: -2

Yes, the card can be blocked. The card would count as a creature, that in this situation, is attacking. Unless you decided to enchant it or use a spell that causes otherwise, the land *would* be able to be blocked, as well as block.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: I think maybe you missed the part of the question where the Nature's Revolt, which is making the land a creature in the first place, is destroyed after attackers are declared.  
> **username_3**: The idea of the question is that the land STOPS being a creature before blockers are declared. Could you maybe consider editing or deleting this answer due to irrelevancy?  

---

