<p>Why would it? Nothing in the Sultan status says you can't lose wealth. It simply raises your wealth like so many other effects, and the rules clearly limit your wealth to Princely if you have no treasure.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-28T20:50:23.363Z
2015-06-28T20:50:23.363Z
ikegami
<p><strong>Does being <em>Sultan</em> bypass the special requirements for being <em>Fabulously</em> Wealthy?</strong></p>

<p>When gaining the Sultan status, a player automatically moves their wealth counter directly to <em>fabulous</em> (the highest option).  However, being <em>Fabulously</em> Wealthy also has a requirement that the player must possess a treasure.  Does being Sultan supersede this rule, or would a Sultan without any treasure be immediately moved back down to <em>Princely</em> regardless of their status?</p>

<tales-of-arabian-nights>
Fabulous Wealth as Sultan
Southpaw Hare
# Fabulous Wealth as Sultan

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-06-28)

**Does being *Sultan* bypass the special requirements for being *Fabulously* Wealthy?**

When gaining the Sultan status, a player automatically moves their wealth counter directly to *fabulous* (the highest option). However, being *Fabulously* Wealthy also has a requirement that the player must possess a treasure. Does being Sultan supersede this rule, or would a Sultan without any treasure be immediately moved back down to *Princely* regardless of their status?

**Tags:** tales-of-arabian-nights


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-06-28. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

Why would it? Nothing in the Sultan status says you can't lose wealth. It simply raises your wealth like so many other effects, and the rules clearly limit your wealth to Princely if you have no treasure.


---

