<p>Yes, this is fine.</p>

<p>Remand will counter Grapshot and move it to its owner's hand. Then, when it comes time for Negate to resolve, it will be countered by the rules instead (for not having any legal targets).</p>

<p>It's worth noting that Negate is particularly ineffective against Grapeshot as it will not stop the copies from being made even if it counters the original spell.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-02T22:21:54.397Z
2017-10-03T03:00:46.717Z
2017-10-03T03:00:46.717Z
eyeballfrog
<p>If I play <a class="mtg-autocard" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bGrapeshot%5d">Grapeshot</a> and my oponnent plays <a class="mtg-autocard" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bNegate%5d">Negate</a>, can I play a <a class="mtg-autocard" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bRemand%5d">Remand</a> on Grapeshot to send it back to my hand?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-02T22:12:03.673Z
What makes you think there might be a problem with doing this?
murgatroid99
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-02T22:57:09.660Z
This is Grapeshot - you might want to remand it ANYWAY just so you can play it again, since your storm count is now going to be 2 more than it was before!
corsiKa
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-03T00:49:09.667Z
@corsiKa Three, even, thanks to the enemy counterspell counting as well.
Alex P
<magic-the-gathering>
Targeting the same spell on stack
user21560
# Targeting the same spell on stack

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-10-02)

If I play [Grapeshot](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bGrapeshot%5d) and my oponnent plays [Negate](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bNegate%5d), can I play a [Remand](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bRemand%5d) on Grapeshot to send it back to my hand?

**Tags:** magic-the-gathering

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What makes you think there might be a problem with doing this?  
> **username_2**: This is Grapeshot - you might want to remand it ANYWAY just so you can play it again, since your storm count is now going to be 2 more than it was before!  
> **username_3**: @username_2 Three, even, thanks to the enemy counterspell counting as well.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2017-10-02. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

Yes, this is fine.

Remand will counter Grapshot and move it to its owner's hand. Then, when it comes time for Negate to resolve, it will be countered by the rules instead (for not having any legal targets).

It's worth noting that Negate is particularly ineffective against Grapeshot as it will not stop the copies from being made even if it counters the original spell.


---

