<p>This is called "castling".  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling#History" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia article</a> has information about the origins of the move.</p>

<p>The move is important to build a fortress for your king, and to free the rook for attacking the enemy king.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2010-10-19T21:24:57.380Z
2012-10-23T17:25:48.967Z
2012-10-23T17:25:48.967Z
Toon Krijthe
<p>The name of the move is castling. </p>

<p>The history of the move is explained well on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling" rel="nofollow">wikipedia page</a>. </p>

CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-19T21:26:41.233Z
2010-10-19T21:26:41.233Z
lavonardo
<p>The main advantage is that you move 2 at the same time. It's important to note that the 2 castlings are not the same. The long one is more aggressive and if you do it right, you get your rook in line with your queen.</p>

<p>Traditionally, taking the center should be an objective. Castling enables this.</p>

<p>I don't consider myself a strong player, but in my experience, Castling is best used for positioning rather as a defense for your King. Remember, you need to have the Initiative...</p>

CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-19T22:23:32.203Z
2010-10-19T22:23:32.203Z
eipipuz
<p>About the importance of the move:</p>

<ul>
<li>(Usually) Helps to get your king to safety. Very often, center line is not safe in a battlefield.</li>
<li>Brings the rook closer to the center line. Oftentimes, the fight will be around those lines. You could read on "importance of center" if you are interested.</li>
<li>Only move that lets you move two pieces helping in tempo</li>
<li>Only move that lets you move your king two squares</li>
<li>Allows one to connect the rooks. We say rooks are connected when they protect each other.</li>
</ul>

<p>Of these, the first two are the most important. King safety is essential by the very nature of the game. Getting the rook out in the game is also important. For example, in many queen side castling moves, players intend to bring the rook for the attack.
Many people use this move in almost all their games.</p>

<p>And when was it included in chess? Obviously, it was not in the early versions of the game. It is an addition to the fast European chess for sure. 14th or 15th century is an estimated time. The wikipedia entry for castling looks nice.<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling</a><br>
This related question is on the history of castling. It is a nice read.<br>
<a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/486/how-did-castling-originate">https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/486/how-did-castling-originate</a></p>

<p>Happy Castling.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-27T12:08:14.260Z
2017-10-27T12:08:14.260Z
Cyriac Antony
<p>The main purpose of castling is to "develop" the king, not the rook. The king is easier to defend towards the end squares but can be in danger anywhere.</p>

<p>However around the e-file the king also gets in the way of the other pieces, in particular blocking the rook in. Thus the castling move "swaps" the positions of the king and rook simultaneously.</p>

<p>The normal sequence of opening moves is to first get minor pieces out and a few pawns, castle, get the queen out and that leaves the two rooks alone in the back-rank aside from the king near the end where they can move around freely between the files.</p>

<p>In highly "attacking" chess games, the two players may castle on opposite sides, i.e. one does the king-side and the other the queen-side. You then launch an attack on the side where the other play has his king by moving the pawns forward. However you also need to defend your own side from the opponents attack.</p>

<p>Such games often suit white better. I therefore once had a rule that if I was black I would wait for my opponent to castle first. I'm not sure about the general validity of that rule, but something to consider.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-22T10:00:06.467Z
2014-10-22T10:00:06.467Z
CashCow
<p>It's called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling" rel="nofollow noreferrer">castling</a>. It's important because it gets your king out of danger (the centre is not safe), while simultaneously moving your 'tower' (also called a Castle, or a Rook) into the centre, where it is much more useful.</p>

<p>See this related question: <a href="https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/12/is-castling-still-done-in-the-openings-in-modern-chess">Is castling still done in the openings in modern chess?</a></p>

CC BY-SA 2.5
2011-01-12T02:53:12.447Z
I'm certainly not a chess expert, but I think that "Castle" nowadays refers exclusively to the move, not the piece.
Andrew Vandever
CC BY-SA 2.5
2011-01-12T23:20:23.360Z
@Andrew Vandever - you're certainly right that it's an outdated name, but it's still common to hear it used informally. See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_%28chess%29.
ire_and_curses
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-04-18T08:44:38.393Z
@andrew in english maybe. In other languages it's still roughly the name. In Dutch and German for example the piece is called (translated to English) the "Tower".
jwenting
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-27T12:35:53.633Z
"Castle" isn't a proper name for the piece, but isn't unheard of, especially when teaching the game to children or people totally unfamiliar with the pieces, because it just looks like a castle. Some people also call the Knight the "Horse".
Nuclear Hoagie
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-19T21:25:26.880Z
2010-10-19T21:25:26.880Z
2017-04-13T12:38:50.353Z
ire_and_curses
<p>I'm a chess beginner, and I was wondering: why was this movement introduced to chess, and why is it important to the game?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-22T14:59:23.767Z
The question is somewhat general-reference; a Google search for "swap king and rook" brings up the Wikipedia article on "Castling" as the first result, which would tell bigown all he'd need to know about the move and more. Stack Exchange is not supposed to be a substitution for Google; in fact the point is to supplement Google search results for similar queries to the questions asked.
KeithS
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-19T22:43:36.840Z
@down voter, please justify your vote. On private beta is very very important to know why a question isn't good.
Maniero
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-20T17:15:16.747Z
He might be referring to the fact that the piece isn't called the Castle, it's called the rook (regardless of whether Ron Weasley called it that, it's not correct)
McKay
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-20T17:26:57.537Z
@McKay: In that case he should learn to post a comment about the problem or edit when he have enough rep to do. Down vote is to bad question.
Maniero
CC BY-SA 2.5
2010-10-20T17:33:21.013Z
I concur.
McKay
<chess>
What's the name of the move where the player swaps King and Rook/Castle in Chess? Why is this move important?
Maniero
# What's the name of the move where the player swaps King and Rook/Castle in Chess? Why is this move important?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2010-10-19)

I'm a chess beginner, and I was wondering: why was this movement introduced to chess, and why is it important to the game?

**Tags:** chess

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: @down voter, please justify your vote. On private beta is very very important to know why a question isn't good.  
> **username_2**: He might be referring to the fact that the piece isn't called the Castle, it's called the rook (regardless of whether Ron Weasley called it that, it's not correct)  
> **username_0**: @username_2: In that case he should learn to post a comment about the problem or edit when he have enough rep to do. Down vote is to bad question.  
> **username_2**: I concur.  
> **username_1**: The question is somewhat general-reference; a Google search for "swap king and rook" brings up the Wikipedia article on "Castling" as the first result, which would tell bigown all he'd need to know about the move and more. Stack Exchange is not supposed to be a substitution for Google; in fact the point is to supplement Google search results for similar queries to the questions asked.  

---

## 6 answers

### Answer by username_8 on 2010-10-19. Score: 27 | Accepted answer

It's called [castling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling). It's important because it gets your king out of danger (the centre is not safe), while simultaneously moving your 'tower' (also called a Castle, or a Rook) into the centre, where it is much more useful.

See this related question: [Is castling still done in the openings in modern chess?](https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/12/is-castling-still-done-in-the-openings-in-modern-chess)

> **Comments:**
> **username_9**: I'm certainly not a chess expert, but I think that "Castle" nowadays refers exclusively to the move, not the piece.  
> **username_8**: @username_9 - you're certainly right that it's an outdated name, but it's still common to hear it used informally. See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_%28chess%29.  
> **username_10**: @andrew in english maybe. In other languages it's still roughly the name. In Dutch and German for example the piece is called (translated to English) the "Tower".  
> **username_11**: "Castle" isn't a proper name for the piece, but isn't unheard of, especially when teaching the game to children or people totally unfamiliar with the pieces, because it just looks like a castle. Some people also call the Knight the "Horse".  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2010-10-19. Score: 5

This is called "castling". The [Wikipedia article](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling#History) has information about the origins of the move.

The move is important to build a fortress for your king, and to free the rook for attacking the enemy king.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2010-10-19. Score: 4

The name of the move is castling.

The history of the move is explained well on the [wikipedia page](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling).


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2010-10-19. Score: 2

The main advantage is that you move 2 at the same time. It's important to note that the 2 castlings are not the same. The long one is more aggressive and if you do it right, you get your rook in line with your queen.

Traditionally, taking the center should be an objective. Castling enables this.

I don't consider myself a strong player, but in my experience, Castling is best used for positioning rather as a defense for your King. Remember, you need to have the Initiative...


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2017-10-27. Score: 2

About the importance of the move:

* (Usually) Helps to get your king to safety. Very often, center line is not safe in a battlefield.
* Brings the rook closer to the center line. Oftentimes, the fight will be around those lines. You could read on "importance of center" if you are interested.
* Only move that lets you move two pieces helping in tempo
* Only move that lets you move your king two squares
* Allows one to connect the rooks. We say rooks are connected when they protect each other.

Of these, the first two are the most important. King safety is essential by the very nature of the game. Getting the rook out in the game is also important. For example, in many queen side castling moves, players intend to bring the rook for the attack.
Many people use this move in almost all their games.

And when was it included in chess? Obviously, it was not in the early versions of the game. It is an addition to the fast European chess for sure. 14th or 15th century is an estimated time. The wikipedia entry for castling looks nice.  
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling>  
This related question is on the history of castling. It is a nice read.  
<https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/486/how-did-castling-originate>

Happy Castling.


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2014-10-22. Score: 1

The main purpose of castling is to "develop" the king, not the rook. The king is easier to defend towards the end squares but can be in danger anywhere.

However around the e-file the king also gets in the way of the other pieces, in particular blocking the rook in. Thus the castling move "swaps" the positions of the king and rook simultaneously.

The normal sequence of opening moves is to first get minor pieces out and a few pawns, castle, get the queen out and that leaves the two rooks alone in the back-rank aside from the king near the end where they can move around freely between the files.

In highly "attacking" chess games, the two players may castle on opposite sides, i.e. one does the king-side and the other the queen-side. You then launch an attack on the side where the other play has his king by moving the pawns forward. However you also need to defend your own side from the opponents attack.

Such games often suit white better. I therefore once had a rule that if I was black I would wait for my opponent to castle first. I'm not sure about the general validity of that rule, but something to consider.


---

