<p>Both attacks/moves are successful. Supports can be cut by attack from elsewhere, but moves aren't.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-08-18T20:40:11.520Z
2018-08-18T20:40:11.520Z
Ry4an Brase
<p>Let's say an English fleet has orders to attack Denmark from Skagarac, with plenty of support to take it. However, a Russian fleet attacks the English fleet from the Baltic Sea, with plenty of support to take Skagarac.</p>

<p>Would the Russian fleet's attack take priority, preventing the English fleet from taking Denmark? Or would both moves be successful, putting Denmark in English control and Skagarac in Russian control?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-08-20T03:49:35.217Z
BAL and SKA are not adjacent. Ry4an's answer to the question in the title is correct.
Peter McNamara
<diplomacy>
If unit A attacks unit B (which was attacking unit C) does the attack on B by A stop the attack on C by B?
GearyGears
# If unit A attacks unit B (which was attacking unit C) does the attack on B by A stop the attack on C by B?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-08-18)

Let's say an English fleet has orders to attack Denmark from Skagarac, with plenty of support to take it. However, a Russian fleet attacks the English fleet from the Baltic Sea, with plenty of support to take Skagarac.

Would the Russian fleet's attack take priority, preventing the English fleet from taking Denmark? Or would both moves be successful, putting Denmark in English control and Skagarac in Russian control?

**Tags:** diplomacy

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: BAL and SKA are not adjacent. Ry4an's answer to the question in the title is correct.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-08-18. Score: 1

Both attacks/moves are successful. Supports can be cut by attack from elsewhere, but moves aren't.


---

