Answers.Body: <p>This is possibly more of a molecular genetics question appropriate to biology.stackexchange.com, also note that it's usually better on stackexchange sites to <a href="https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask">restrict your post to a single question</a> and do some preliminary research via google or your search engine of choice. But I don't see any harm in answering it here nonetheless. </p>
  
  <p>The real answer is that naming conventions for genes/proteins are incredibly inconsistent and counterintuitive. You can't really draw any conclusions about a gene/protein based on its name alone. For example, some proteins such as p53 are named for biochemical features, others are named for phenotypes observed when their gene is mutated, such as for instance the gene <em>decapentaplegic</em> in fruit flies. Often they involve little jokes, such as the gene called <em>mothers against decapentaplegic</em> which represses the <em>decapentaplegic</em> mutant phenotype. So it's all a bit of a mess and people kind of assume that you'll follow along, which can be confusing.</p>
  
  <p>It's a little rarer that gene names differ substantially from the names of the proteins they encode, but not unheard-of. This is indeed the case with your <em>TP53</em>/p53 example. See a short explainer <a href="https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/TP53" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> or a longer one <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>. What you'll notice is that there are in fact multiple different names for the same gene/protein. What you'll often see is that the shorter name (p53) is the one that people tend to use colloquially.</p>
  
  <p>For your second question regarding how mutations are propagated, the short answer is that mutations are inherited from mother to daughter cells. Cells don't generally "infect" other cells with mutations (though in biology there are always exceptions). I think that what you are interested in is <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=somatic%20and%20germline%20mutations&amp;rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS695US695&amp;oq=somatic%20and%20germ&amp;aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57j0l6.3541j0j4&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the difference between "somatic" and "germ-line" mutation</a>.</p>
  
  <p>Hope that helps.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-02-10T09:40:04.577Z
Answers.Text: My paperback edition is 'not for sale in the US' and lacks some clarifications on the margins which I have seen in an online version of the book. These clarifications are really good, not sure why they are missing!!
Answers.UserDisplayName: Chicago1988
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-02-11T15:20:52.870Z
Answers.Text: @Chicago1988 I think that these clarifications are missing from most textbooks in biology (!)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Maximilian Press
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2020-02-08T17:35:46.460Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2020-02-08T17:35:46.460Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Maximilian Press
Body: <p>I am new to bioinformatics. While reading Momand's '<em>Concepts in Bioinformatics and Genomics</em>' , I understood clearly that each codon translates to a specific amino acid.</p>
  
  <p>But then, he talks about the <em>TP53</em> gene, and then without explanation talks about P53... Is that a naming convention? It's not explicitly explained... Does that applies for any case? ie <em>TP90</em> gene encodes protein P90?</p>
  
  <p>I don't understand the naming: correct me if wrong, but they named the gene after the protein's weight, which is 53 kilodaltons? 
  (It confuses me with the location of the gene).</p>
  
  <p>Lastly I do not understand: if there is a mutation in the DNA, the mutation shall appear in only one cell I guess, how then the others cells' DNA start to mutate? or is it that all DNA in all cells are mutated instantly?</p>
  
Tags: <gene>
Title: tp53 example in Momand's book
ThreadText: # tp53 example in Momand's book
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2020-02-08)
  
  I am new to bioinformatics. While reading Momand's '*Concepts in Bioinformatics and Genomics*' , I understood clearly that each codon translates to a specific amino acid.
  
  But then, he talks about the *TP53* gene, and then without explanation talks about P53... Is that a naming convention? It's not explicitly explained... Does that applies for any case? ie *TP90* gene encodes protein P90?
  
  I don't understand the naming: correct me if wrong, but they named the gene after the protein's weight, which is 53 kilodaltons?
  (It confuses me with the location of the gene).
  
  Lastly I do not understand: if there is a mutation in the DNA, the mutation shall appear in only one cell I guess, how then the others cells' DNA start to mutate? or is it that all DNA in all cells are mutated instantly?
  
  **Tags:** gene
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2020-02-08. Score: 3 | Accepted answer
  
  This is possibly more of a molecular genetics question appropriate to biology.stackexchange.com, also note that it's usually better on stackexchange sites to [restrict your post to a single question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and do some preliminary research via google or your search engine of choice. But I don't see any harm in answering it here nonetheless.
  
  The real answer is that naming conventions for genes/proteins are incredibly inconsistent and counterintuitive. You can't really draw any conclusions about a gene/protein based on its name alone. For example, some proteins such as p53 are named for biochemical features, others are named for phenotypes observed when their gene is mutated, such as for instance the gene *decapentaplegic* in fruit flies. Often they involve little jokes, such as the gene called *mothers against decapentaplegic* which represses the *decapentaplegic* mutant phenotype. So it's all a bit of a mess and people kind of assume that you'll follow along, which can be confusing.
  
  It's a little rarer that gene names differ substantially from the names of the proteins they encode, but not unheard-of. This is indeed the case with your *TP53*/p53 example. See a short explainer [here](https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/TP53) or a longer one [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53). What you'll notice is that there are in fact multiple different names for the same gene/protein. What you'll often see is that the shorter name (p53) is the one that people tend to use colloquially.
  
  For your second question regarding how mutations are propagated, the short answer is that mutations are inherited from mother to daughter cells. Cells don't generally "infect" other cells with mutations (though in biology there are always exceptions). I think that what you are interested in is [the difference between "somatic" and "germ-line" mutation](https://www.google.com/search?q=somatic%20and%20germline%20mutations&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS695US695&oq=somatic%20and%20germ&aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57j0l6.3541j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8).
  
  Hope that helps.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: My paperback edition is 'not for sale in the US' and lacks some clarifications on the margins which I have seen in an online version of the book. These clarifications are really good, not sure why they are missing!!  
  > **username_1**: @username_0 I think that these clarifications are missing from most textbooks in biology (!)  
  
  ---
  
  