Answers.Body: <p>I'm not familiar with this file structure, but have you looked at the <a href="https://forum.depmap.org/t/what-is-relative-copy-number-copy-number-ratio/104/9" rel="nofollow noreferrer">forum post</a> about relative copy number linked to in the FAQ?</p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>Since we do not have matched normals, the output is a “copy ratio” or relative copy number. It is relative to the rest of the genome for that cell line. E.g. if the cell line is tetraploid we would not be able to see it from the relative copy number. These values are reported as log2(relative CN + 1) in the portal.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-24T10:50:17.037Z
Answers.Text: Yes I checked but I still have the same doubts
Answers.UserDisplayName: flavinsky
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2022-01-22T00:12:15.857Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2022-01-22T00:12:15.857Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: gringer
Body: <p><em>This question has also been asked on <a href="https://www.biostars.org/p/9507213/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Biostars</a></em></p>
  <p>How do I convert the Copy Number (CN) file into useful information such as HOMDEL and AMP?</p>
  <p>This is an already normalized file with pseudo count + 1. In this file there are values from 0 to 1 for each cancer cell line, in wide format.</p>
  <p>I have already looked at the <a href="https://forum.depmap.org/t/what-is-relative-copy-number-copy-number-ratio/104/9" rel="nofollow noreferrer">forum post</a> about the file, but it's not helpful for me.</p>
  <p>This is what the file looks like:</p>
  <pre><code>,DDX11L1 (100287102),WASH7P (653635),FAM138A (645520),OR4F5 (79501)
  ACH-000621,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812
  ACH-002512,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433
  ACH-001188,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964
  ACH-000471,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594
  </code></pre>
  <p>Thank you for your help</p>
  
Tags: <cancer><cell-line><copy-number>
Title: How to interpret the Copy Number from pseudocount depmap portal file?
ThreadText: # How to interpret the Copy Number from pseudocount depmap portal file?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2022-01-21)
  
  *This question has also been asked on [Biostars](https://www.biostars.org/p/9507213/)*
  
  How do I convert the Copy Number (CN) file into useful information such as HOMDEL and AMP?
  
  This is an already normalized file with pseudo count + 1. In this file there are values from 0 to 1 for each cancer cell line, in wide format.
  
  I have already looked at the [forum post](https://forum.depmap.org/t/what-is-relative-copy-number-copy-number-ratio/104/9) about the file, but it's not helpful for me.
  
  This is what the file looks like:
  
  ```
  ,DDX11L1 (100287102),WASH7P (653635),FAM138A (645520),OR4F5 (79501)
  ACH-000621,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812,1.0166833616923812
  ACH-002512,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433,2.9659871795507433
  ACH-001188,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964,0.9881267634909964
  ACH-000471,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594,0.8053837915961594
  
  ```
  
  Thank you for your help
  
  **Tags:** cancer, cell-line, copy-number
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2022-01-22. Score: 1
  
  I'm not familiar with this file structure, but have you looked at the [forum post](https://forum.depmap.org/t/what-is-relative-copy-number-copy-number-ratio/104/9) about relative copy number linked to in the FAQ?
  
  > Since we do not have matched normals, the output is a “copy ratio” or relative copy number. It is relative to the rest of the genome for that cell line. E.g. if the cell line is tetraploid we would not be able to see it from the relative copy number. These values are reported as log2(relative CN + 1) in the portal.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Yes I checked but I still have the same doubts  
  
  ---
  
  