Answers.Body: <p><em>Answer from @throckmorton, converted from comment:</em></p>
  <p>Here is a recent approach to this problem, using multiple linear references:</p>
  <p><a href="https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-020-02229-3" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-020-02229-3</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-05-17T04:27:18.600Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-05-17T04:27:18.600Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: gringer
Answers.Body: <p>Slightly older than @gringer 's reference, but still from Richard Durbin himself</p>
  <p>&quot;Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference&quot;</p>
  <p><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30125266/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30125266/</a></p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2021-05-24T23:08:17.203Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2021-05-24T23:08:17.203Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Álvaro
Body: <p>I've recently learned about the reference bias issue - inability to properly map NGS reads in certain genomic regions caused by the fact that our standard genomic references are linear and do not fully represent the genomic variation present in the population. According to what I read this has multiple consequences: missing structural variants or variants in highly variable regions like HLA for humans.</p>
  <p>Now I wonder what is the best way to address this. Of course, &quot;best&quot; is context-dependent but I don't have any specific context so general pros and cons will be highly appreciated. I know about two approaches but probably there are more. The first one is an alt-aware mapping that's used in DRAGEN by Illumina. As far as I understand, they just keep multiple linear alternatives for some regions and try doing a &quot;smarter&quot; mapping for those regions. The second approach that I've found is using graph references where the reference is not linear anymore but rather a graph and mapping is taking into account this graph structure.</p>
  <p>Thanks in advance.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-05-17T04:29:05.033Z
Comments.Text: Hi @igor, is there any chance you could add some more personal context to this? Bioinformatics frequently offers multiple solutions to the same problem, so answers here are much higher quality if they can be targeted to your specific use case.
Comments.UserDisplayName: gringer
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2021-05-23T16:23:46.650Z
Comments.Text: Thanks for your comment @gringer.
  I don't really have context beyond the described one. Just curious about the approaches that address this issue.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Igor
Tags: <variant-calling><read-mapping><reference-genome><structural-variation>
Title: Solutions to reference bias issue
ThreadText: # Solutions to reference bias issue
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2021-05-15)
  
  I've recently learned about the reference bias issue - inability to properly map NGS reads in certain genomic regions caused by the fact that our standard genomic references are linear and do not fully represent the genomic variation present in the population. According to what I read this has multiple consequences: missing structural variants or variants in highly variable regions like HLA for humans.
  
  Now I wonder what is the best way to address this. Of course, "best" is context-dependent but I don't have any specific context so general pros and cons will be highly appreciated. I know about two approaches but probably there are more. The first one is an alt-aware mapping that's used in DRAGEN by Illumina. As far as I understand, they just keep multiple linear alternatives for some regions and try doing a "smarter" mapping for those regions. The second approach that I've found is using graph references where the reference is not linear anymore but rather a graph and mapping is taking into account this graph structure.
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  **Tags:** variant-calling, read-mapping, reference-genome, structural-variation
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Hi @username_0, is there any chance you could add some more personal context to this? Bioinformatics frequently offers multiple solutions to the same problem, so answers here are much higher quality if they can be targeted to your specific use case.  
  > **username_0**: Thanks for your comment @username_1. I don't really have context beyond the described one. Just curious about the approaches that address this issue.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2021-05-17. Score: 2
  
  *Answer from @throckmorton, converted from comment:*
  
  Here is a recent approach to this problem, using multiple linear references:
  
  <https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-020-02229-3>
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2021-05-24. Score: 2
  
  Slightly older than @username_1 's reference, but still from Richard Durbin himself
  
  "Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference"
  
  <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30125266/>
  
  
  ---
  
  