Revelations of the Pegasus Project investigation by journalists related to India and the aftermath
In India, the Pegasus Project investigations alleged that the Pegasus spyware was used on ministers, opposition leaders, political strategist and tacticians, journalists, activists, minority leaders, Supreme Court judges, religious leaders, administrators like Election Commissioners and heads of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Some of these phones were later digitally &amp; forensically analysed by Amnesty International's Security Lab on 10 Indian phones and the analysis showed signs of either an attempted or successful Pegasus hack. However, the Supreme Court of India stated that the technical committee had found 'malware' in 5 of the 29 phones, but not able to say conclusively that the malware found was Pegasus. The Chief Justice also mentioned that the government refused to cooperate in the investigation.
The Pegasus Project was a collaborative investigative journalism initiative undertaken by 17 media consortium. Pegasus is a spyware developed by the NSO Group, an Israeli technology and cyber-arms firm that can be secretly deployed on mobile phones and other devices, which run most versions of Android and iOS. Pegasus is capable of reading text messages, tracking calls, collecting passwords, location tracking, accessing the target device's microphone and camera, and harvesting information from apps. Since Pegasus is classified as cyber-arms by the Israeli government, only national governments can purchase the spyware after the authorisation of the Israeli government.
The Pegasus Project initiative investigated the use of the Pegasus spyware by governments on journalists, opposition politicians, activists and business people. A target list consisting of 50,000 phone numbers, which could have been possibly targeted by the spyware, leaked to Forbidden Stories which spawned this investigation. 300 of these numbers were from India. The presence of a phone number on the list does not confirm the use of Pegasus and only forensic examination of a phone can confirm if the spyware was present. Supreme court appointed a technical committee and asked to submit the phones for investigation of those individuals who suspect snooping by the government.
List of alleged targets.
The following are the list of some of the alleged Indian targets according to the Pegasus Project investigations:
Reactions.
Judiciary.
The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) released the following statement:Such large-scale intrusive surveillance into the personal phones of political leaders, journalists, activists is a flagrant violation of the right to privacy as upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and an affront on the civil liberties of citizens.CJAR stated that this was an attack on the independence of the judiciary and called for a response from the highest court in the land. It also stated that the snooping was patently illegal.
CJAR further stated that the allegations of hacking of a sitting Supreme Court judge of ex-Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi's staffer, who accused Gogoi of sexual harassment, and her family members were of "grave seriousness". It raised the question asking why a software that was reported sold only to "vetted governments" for national security issues was used to spy on Gogoi's staffer and also demanded a probe into improper collusion between the executive and judiciary.
In the press release, they further stated:The victimisation of the woman by the police, the many questionably judicial orders passed by benches headed by Justice Gogoi favourable to the Union Government, and Justice Gogoi's nomination to the Rajya Sabha soon after his retirement raises serious questions about such collusionIt recommended Special Investigation Team headed by a retired Supreme court judge be set up to investigate the Pegasus snooping scandal and probe if there was any improper collusion between the Union Government and the former Chief Justice of India.
Journalists.
In a tweet the Press Club of India (PCI) issued a statement:This is the first time in the history of this country that all pillars of our democracy — judiciary, Parliamentarians, media, executives &amp; ministers — have been spied upon. This is unprecedented and the PCI condemns unequivocally. The snooping has been done for ulterior motives. What is disturbing is that a foreign agency, which has nothing to do with the national interest of the country, was engaged to spy on its citizens. This breeds distrust and will invite anarchy. The Govt should come out clean on this front and clarify.Similarly, the Editor's Guild of India also released a statement directed against the alleged spying made by the Indian government, saying:This act of snooping essentially conveys that journalism and political dissent are now equated with 'terror'. How can a constitutional democracy survive if governments do not make an effort to protect freedom of speech and allows surveillance with such impunity?It asked for a Supreme Court monitored enquiry into the matter, and further demanded that the inquiry committee should include people of impeccable credibility from different walks of life—including journalists and civil society—so that it can independently investigate the facts around the extent and intent of snooping using the services of Pegasus.
Senior journalists N Ram and Sashi Kumar approached the Supreme Court to seek an investigation into the matter. They stated that the targeted surveillance "grossly disproportionate invasion of the right to privacy". A bench headed by Chief Justice of India N. V. Ramana is set to hear the petition.
Some news articles were released making claims that Amnesty never claimed that the leaked phone numbers were of NSO's Pegasus spyware list. These claims where repeated by some BJP leaders. However, these reports were later proven to be false, and Amnesty issued a statement stating that it categorically stands by the findings of the investigation and that the data is irrefutably linked to potential targets of NSO Group's Pegasus spyware.
Union government.
The Union government denied the request for a probe or investigation or an independent Supreme Court inquiry by the opposition into the matter. The former IT minister of India Ravi Shankar Prasad asked, "If more than 45 nations are using Pegasus as NSO has said, why is only India being targeted?"
Many members of the government and the ruling BJP party such as home Minister of Home and Internal Security Amit Shah, Minister of Electronics &amp; Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Karnataka Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and Devendra Fadnavis have alleged that the Pegasus Project is an international conspiracy to malign Indian democracy and defame India. Vaishnaw stated the report came one day before the monsoon session of Parliament and that "this cannot be a coincidence" and Yogi Adityanath said "the opposition, knowingly or unknowingly, is falling prey to the international conspiracy." Devendra Fadnavis said that "the opposition doesn't want the parliament to run smoothly. Pegasus project is a conspiracy to ruin the nation".
The official response of the government of India to "The Washington Post" stated that "[t]he allegations regarding government surveillance on specific people has no concrete basis or truth associated with it whatsoever" and that such news reports were an attempt to "malign the Indian democracy and its institutions". They further stated that each case of interception, monitoring and decryption is approved by the Union Home Secretary and that there exists an oversight mechanism in the form of a review committee headed by the Union Cabinet Secretary and that any such interceptions have been done under the due process of law.
Ashwini Vaishnaw in a statement in parliament stated that the reports were "highly sensational" and that they had "no factual basis". He further stated that NSO themselves had rubbished the claims. He stated that the existence of numbers in a list was not sufficient evidence to indicate that the spyware was used and said that the report itself stated the same and without the physical examination of the phone such claims cannot be corroborated.
Amit Shah in a statement on his blog insinuated that this was an attempt to disrupt the monsoon session of the parliament and that the opposition parties were "jumping on a bandwagon" and were trying to "derail anything progressive that comes up in Parliament". He stated that the report was an attempt to "derail India's development trajectory through their conspiracies".
Replying to allegations from the opposition, Minister of State in Ministry of Home Affairs Ajay Kumar Mishra said that there is no reason for a probe and the people who made the allegations are "political failures".
Opposition.
On 27 July 2021 ten opposition parties met to coordinate their response to move joint adjournment notice in Lok Sabha to discuss the Pegasus snooping issue. The meeting was attended by leaders of Congress, NCP, Shiv Sena, DMK, National Conference, RSP, IUML, BSP and CPI M.
On 28 July 2021 a similar meeting of leaders of fourteen opposition parties to with the same aim took place. Leaders from the Congress, DMK, NCP, Shiv Sena, RJD, SP, CPI M, CPI, NC, AAP, IUML, RSP, KCM and VCK where in attendance.
Indian National Congress.
The Indian National Congress accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of "treason" and compromising national security following the release of the reports and called for the removal of Minister of Home and Internal Security Amit Shah and an investigation of the role of Prime Minister Narendra Modi into the affair. Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the Indian National Congress, later claimed that the Prime Minister "hit the soul of democracy" by using Pegasus. He went on to chair a meeting consisting of many opposition parties to push jointly in the Parliament for discussion on Pegasus.
Shashi Tharoor, a senior leader of the Indian National Congress and the head of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology. The committee summoned officials of Ministry of Information Technology &amp; Ministry of Home Affairs for questioning regarding the matter. However, the committee was unable to meet as the BJP members of the committee refused to register their attendance despite being present, and the quorum was not met. As a reaction to this, a member of a committee stated: "what happened today shows the lengths to which BJP is willing to go in order to not discuss the Pegasus spyware issue".
Tharoor also demanded a Supreme Court judge-monitored probe into the issue and stated that the opposition would continue to bring up the issue in the Parliament until the central government would agree to discuss the issue. He alleged that the central government made use of tax payer's money for political gains.
The former home minister and finance minister, P Chidambaram, pointed out that other countries such as France and Israel have begun their own investigation into the matter, and that "only Indian government not concerned about Pegasus issue". He also said that the prime minister must make a statement in the Parliament to clarify whether or not snooping has been done by the central government. He further stated that the government has an "ostrich-like attitude" because of their avoidance of discussion on the subject in parliament.
All India Trinamool Congress.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, from the AITC, alleged that the central government intends to "turn India into a surveillance state" where "democracy is in danger". She also claimed that Pegasus was used to keep track of the meetings between her and Prashant Kishore during the 2021 West Bengal elections. She also said that she had to tape her phone to avoid being spied on.
She accused the central government of sitting idle on the matter and set up a judicial inquiry panel to investigate the allegations that were revealed by the Pegasus Project. She further sought an all party meeting to discuss the matter.
CPI (M).
Advocate M L Sharma and John Brittas, a member of the Rajya Sabha of the CPI (M) party filed a petition that sought a court-monitored probe into the allegations of unauthorised use of the Pegasus spyware on Indian citizens. The petition alleged that the use of Pegasus on Indian citizens was a "serious attack upon Indian democracy, judiciary and country’s security."
The petition stated that there were two possibilities – either the snooping was carried out by the Government of India or a foreign agency. It said that if the act was carried out by the government, it would amount to unauthorised spying on Indian citizens and that the spending of resources for political gain by the ruling party should not be allowed. The petition stated if the snooping was carried out by a foreign actor, that it would be an "act of external aggression" that needed to be investigated.
Shiv Sena.
Sanjay Raut, a politician from Shiv Sena stated that "mobile phones have