British inquiry that probed into the 1920 Jerusalem riots
The Palin Commission or Palin Commission of Inquiry or Palin Court of Inquiry was a British Royal Commission convened to investigate the cause of the 1920 Jerusalem riots, which took place between April 4, 1920 and April 7, 1920. The Commission was also tasked with investigating “the extent and causes of racial feelings that at present exist in Palestine”.
The Commission completed its report on July 1, 1920 at Port Said.
The Commission reported that the prelude to the attacks resulted from Arab disappointment at the non-fulfillment of the promises of independence by British authorities, the belief that the Balfour Declaration implied a denial of the Arab right of self-determination, and fear that the establishment of a national home for Jews would result in a significant increase in Jewish immigration, leading to Arab economic and political subjugation.
The Commission’s final report was never published, in anticipation of Zionist objections.
The report is held in the Foreign Office papers at the National Archives as document E9379 under FO 371/5121.
Commission operations.
The commission consisted of three senior military officers; Major General Sir Philip Palin, Brigadier General E. H. Wildblood, and Lieutenant Colonel C. Vaughan Edwards. The Commission convened for 50 days, and examined 152 witnesses in eight languages (English, French, Arabic, Hebrew, Yiddish, Jargon, Russian and Hindustani).
The Zionist Commission was legally represented by S. Alexander of the firm of R.S. Devonshire &amp; Co., Advocates, and used the inquiry to make a "vigorous attack" upon the departing Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA). The Report noted that Jewish representatives persisted in describing the events as a "pogrom", implying that the British administration had connived in the violence. In contrast, the Commission noted that Arab Palestinians rarely attended the court.
By the time the Report was presented in August 1920, the OETA had been replaced by a civilian administration. Sir Herbert Samuel was appointed the first High Commissioner in 1920, before the Council of the League of Nations approved a British Mandate for Palestine, and OETA withdrew to Cairo in preparation for the expected British Mandate. Edmund Allenby advised that the Palin Report should be published; but in anticipation of Zionist objections, it was decided only to convey the gist of the report verbally to a "responsible" Zionist leader.
Summary.
The Report refers to various "causes of the alienation and exasperation of the feelings of the population of Palestine". It cites Jean de la Fontaine's lines in the original French to describe the attitude of the Zionists towards the local Arab population:
 ;templatestyles src="Verse translation/styles.css" / ;
The Report was sharply critical of the Zionists for exacerbating Arab concerns by their "impatience, indiscretion and attempts to force the hands of the Administration" into establishing a Jewish State, as there had been direct communication between the Foreign Office and the Chief Political Officer, Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen, bypassing and sometimes contradicting the OETA. 
Lastly, the report expressed its alarm about the situation in Palestine, calling it "exceedingly dangerous". 
The Report concludes as follows:
"The following are the considered opinions submitted by the Court:"
The Palin findings are similar to those of the Haycraft Report of the following year. The latter report gave more emphasis to the Arab fear that extensive Jewish immigration would lead to Palestine becoming a Jewish dominion.
References.
 ;templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" / ;