Treaty on moral principles for treating seniors
The proposed Convention on the Rights of Older Persons (UNCROP) is likely to be the next major human rights treaty adopted by the United Nations. The proposed treaty will seek to remedy the fragmented human rights structure for Older Persons, and will focus on reaffirming critical human rights which are of concern to older persons. The focus of the treaty will be persons over 60 years of age, which is a growing demographic worldwide due to increased population ageing. The treaty follows from the success of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child which has seen near universal acceptance since 1989. Where the UNCRC focuses on the rights of younger persons, the UNCROP will address those who form the older portion of society, who according to United Nations reports, are becoming increasingly vulnerable as a group without applicable normative standards of human rights law. Support for a Convention is becoming increasingly popular, as human rights groups including the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), HelpAge International, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the International Labour Organization, and many other NGOs and states have expressed support for a universal instrument. A raising number of NGOs from across the world have joined forces in advocating for a Convention in the Global Alliance for the Rights of Older Persons (GAROP) which has been set up out of the need to strengthen the rights of older persons worldwide. With population ageing, the human rights of the growing number of older persons have become an increasingly important issue. Among the human rights issues faced by older persons are ageist attitudes leading to discrimination, exclusion and constraints on the legal capacity, autonomy and independent living of older people. Existing human rights violations have been further exacerbated and put on the spotlight by the COVID-19 pandemic. Older people have been denied access to health services and became prone to physical and social isolation. The stigmatisation of older people and ageist images of older persons have also become more evident. The debate surrounding the convention focuses on the implementation and safeguarding of older persons’ human rights aiming to set normative standards of human rights for older persons in an international legally binding instrument. An underlying common factor and root cause of many of human rights violations experienced by older persons, along with its ubiquitous, prevalent, and surreptitious nature, is ageism. Ageism, as defined by the World Health Organization, refers to the stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination towards others or oneself based on age. A UNCROP would go a long way to tackle ageism. Individual relationships generally fall outside of current human rights law, which seeks to present standards of relations between states and individuals. Therefore, it has been suggested that the proposed human rights convention for older persons ought to be drafted as an anti-discrimination convention. However, this would not be consistent with other multilateral human rights conventions such as the ICCPR and ICESCR which set normative standards.
Content.
Presently, there is no international legally binding instrument to protect the human rights of older persons. It is, however, been discussed since 2011 by "The Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing for the Purpose of Strengthening the Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons" (mostly referred to as the Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing, OEWGA) which was established by United Nations General Assembly in 2010. The OEWGA has debated what the substantive content of a treaty may be. In the most recent session of OEWGA in April 2022, an increasing number of UN Member States took note of the gaps in the existing international human rights system. The fundamental rights affirmed by the proposed treaty would be extensions of those secured by other multilateral treaties, though with a focus on specific issues faced by older persons.
Background.
World Assembly on Ageing.
In 1982, the Report of the World Assembly on Ageing (also known as "the International Plan on Ageing") was published, which represented the first international debate on the rights of older persons and presented a plan for their implementation. The Report sets out a number of underlying principles which are applicable to older persons, importantly the participating states reaffirmed "their belief that the fundamental and inalienable rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights apply fully and undiminished to the aging." The report acknowledged several sub-topics especially applicable to the rights of elderly persons, including health and nutrition, housing and environment, the family, social welfare, income and security and employment, and education. The report therefore gave policy recommendations to address these concerns, including to avoid imbalances in age groups in the public sector, and to give effort to fill longer life spans with a sense of purpose and accomplishment. Additionally, producing proactive policies aimed at healthier older populations and financial security for retirement were promoted. The significance of this report for the proposed convention is its use in determining the United Nations approach to ageing and its members states' internal policies.
United Nations Principles for Older Persons.
The next move towards a convention for the rights of older persons, which was first proposed by Argentina in 1948, was the adoption of the United Nations Principles for Older Persons, in 1991. The Principles provided that older persons in society ought to have independence, the ability to participate in society, have access to care, be entitled to self-fulfilment and the full dignity of life among other rights. The Principles were adopted in October 1992 due to the adoption of the proclamation on aging in General Assembly Resolution 47/5, which contained the proclamation as an annex and giving some weight to the 1991 Principles. However, the implementation of these Principles received little oversight, as under international law United Nations General Assembly Resolutions are not automatically binding on parties. By adopting the Principles, the United Nations brought the rights of older persons to the same moral level as those of other bodies and set some targets towards their implementation, such as the 2001 deadline for meeting global targets on problems for ageing persons.
The Second World Assembly on Ageing.
The Second World Assembly on Ageing saw the adoption of the 2002 Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA), which sought to outline a plan for "building a society for all ages." The Plan aims “to ensure that persons everywhere are able to age with security and dignity and to continue to participate in their societies as citizens with full rights”. It has three priority directions: older persons and development, advancing health and well-being into old age and ensuring enabling and supportive environments. The Plan seeks to achieve these aims by promoting the active participation of older persons in society in its member states. The contribution of the Plan towards an International Convention on the Rights of Older Persons can be seen in the placement of older people into the general context of international human rights law, establishing the groundwork for older persons to be seen as a protected group. It is the first UN document in which UN member states reaffirm their commitment “protect human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to development (…) [and] to eliminating all forms of discrimination, including age discrimination. The Plan is, however, no internationally legally binding instrument. The implementation of the recommendations of MIPAA is reviewed every 5 years, but there is no obligation for states to report on the implementation of MIPAA and its Regional Implementation Strategies at national level.
The Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing for the Purpose of Strengthening the Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons.
In October 2010, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 65/182 which established the "Open‐Ended Working group on Ageing for the purpose of strengthening the Human Rights of Older Persons" as a follow-up to the Madrid Plan. The OEWGA has the mandate to consider the existing international framework of the human rights of older persons and identify possible gaps and how best to address them. The OEWGA forms the primary forum for debate as to the adoption of a multilateral human rights treaty regarding the human rights of older persons, as it focuses on the issues faced by older persons and recognizes gaps in the existing human rights framework. The OEWGA has had 12 sessions as of April 2022, and each of these sessions has aimed to clarify issues surrounding older persons' human rights and provide assistance to member states in their obligations under the Madrid Plan. Before each session the OEWGA invites member states, civil society organisations and national human rights institutions to contribute inputs to the session’s themes. In 2016, the Chair of the OEWGA listed 14 issues/focus areas, suggested by civil society, for discussion during the sessions (two per session). In 2017, it was further decided that in addition to substantive inputs on two themes per session, normative content for the development of the Convention should also be delivered. 
In the first session, select member states acknowledged the difficult position of older person's rights under the traditional international framework, due to the lack of a specific convention. Therefore, the debate regarding the necessity of an international convention on the rights of older persons has been a feature of the OEWGA since its outset, which can be seen through the submissions of member states, international organisations, civil society organisations and national human rights institutes. Increasingly, high-ranking representatives of the United Nations, like the Secretary General himself and the High Commissioner for Human Rights have called for progress to close the gaps related to the human rights of older people in the international human rights framework. Special mandate holders of the OHCHR, including the Independent Expert for the full enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, have also repeatedly expressed their support for a UN Convention.
An overview of the work of the OEWG-A up until April 2022 has been produced by BAGSO, the German National Association of Senior Citizens' Organisations and is available in English, French and German.
Debate and criticism.
Civil society and member states such as Argentina have advocated for a human rights convention since its beginnings, stating in their first submission that:
″There is no legally binding instrument to standardize and protect the rights of older persons... The argument is that the universal nature of international instruments should include the elderly. We all know that this does not happen because we live in an imperfect world. If the world were perfect we would not need any convention, and there is no discrimination. This is why the government of Argentina... support[s] the need for a convention to promote, protect and ensure the full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, ensuring its implementation through a binding instrument″ [sic]
Argentina's submission drew attention to the legislative significance of Human Rights Conventions, and that adopting such a convention for older persons would be in the best interests of the Madrid Plan. Over the years, vast evidence has been brought to the fore confirming gaps in the international human rights system as it relates to the human rights of older persons, as recognised by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her 2022 report. In addition to the 2012 Analytical Outcome Paper on the normative standards in international law in relation to older persons submitted by OHCHR to the third working session of the Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing in August 2012 and an update of this study, prepared in 2021, other UN agencies, special mandate holders of the OHCHR, national human rights institutions and civil society organisations have found that the current international human rights framework does not sufficiently protect older people’s rights.
In addition to inputs submitted to the OEWGA and statements made during the sessions of the OEWGA, civil society organisations and national human rights institutions continue their advocacy work in the intersessional period. In 2021/22, for instance, over 300 NGOs and national human rights institutions have signed an Open Letter to the OEWGA suggesting concrete steps towards the fulfilment of the mandate of the OEWGA.
Over the years, the positioning of some member states changed, so that now they recognise that there are gaps in the international human rights framework, e.g. Austria and Germany. Some previously hesitant or silent member states now join the call for a UN Convention.
A significant gap in normative standards of