Sanskrit scholar from Bengal
Raghunandana (c. 16th century CE) was an Indian Sanskrit scholar from the Bengal region. His writings include 28 Smriti digests on Hindu law and a commentary on the Hindu law code prevalent in Bengal, the "Dayabhaga".
Life.
Raghunandana was born at Nabadwip to a Bengali Brahmin named Harihara Bhattacharya. He was a pupil of Srinatha Acharya Chudamani. His writings mention the works of Brihaspati Rayamukuta, a contemporary of the Bengali sultan Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah &amp; Madhavacharya and are mentioned in the "Viramitrodaya" of Mitramisra (early 17th century). Thus, it can be inferred that Raghunandana lived around the 16th century CE. Other earlier texts cited by him include the "Nirṇayāmṛta". Tradition has it that he was a junior contemporary of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu &amp; a batch-mate of Navya-Nyaya scholar Raghunatha Siromani.
The various estimates of his lifespan include:
Bani Chakravarti wrote a book on him titled the "Samaj-samskarak Raghunandan" (Raghunandan, Culture Giver/Enhancer) in 1964 in the Bengali language.
Works.
"Astavimsati-tattva".
Raghunandana authored 28 Smriti digests on civil law and rituals, collectively known as the "Astavimsati-tattva". The English scholars compared Raghunandana's digests to the "Comyns' Digest", and called him the "Comyns of India".
The titles of these digests end in the word "tattva" (literally "essence"). 27 of these works are mentioned at the beginning of the "Malamasa-tattva".
The 28 digests include:
The "Chandoga-vrsotsarga-tattva", "Rgvrsotsarga-tattva" and "Yajur-vrsotsarga-tattva" are collectively known as the "Vrsotsarga-tattva". The "Deva-pratishtha-tattva" and "Matha-pratishtha-tattva" are collectively known as the "Pratishtha-tattva".
Commentary on "Dayabhaga".
Raghunandana's "Dayabhaga-tika", also known as the "Dayabhaga-vyakhya[na]", is a commentary on Jimutavahana's Hindu law treatise, the "Dayabhaga". During the British Raj, when Hindu law was used in the courts, the Calcutta High Court termed Raghunandana's "Dayabhaga-tika" as the best commentary on the "Dayabhaga". William Jones, a puisne judge at the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William, mentioned that the local Hindu scholars often referred to Jimutavahana's treatise, but it was Raghunandana's work that was "more generally approved" in Bengal.
The commentary quotes several other scholars and works, including Medhatithi, Kulluka Bhatta, the "Mitakshara", the "Vivada-Ratnakara" of Chandeshvara Thakura, Shulapani and the "Vivada-Chintamani" of Vachaspati Mishra (often critically).
There have been some doubts about the authorship of this commentary. Both Henry Thomas Colebrooke (1810) and Julius Eggeling (1891) suspected that it was not authored by the writer of the "Divya-tattva" (that is, Raghunandana). However, Monmohan Chakravarti (1915) and Rajendra Chandra Hazra (1950) both attribute the work to Raghunandana. Pandurang Vaman Kane also ascribes the commentary to him, but not without hesitation.
Other works.
His other works include:
References.
 ;templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" / ;