[Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] [Tag] Because if 6.7% is ok, then why not 4%, 1%. After all, the 1% could be v. durable response. And if 1% is ok, why not a RR that is unknown entirely, but the MOA is sound. And if that is ok, why do we need an agency to make this call for us at all
Leave it to docs & pts
FDA bye