Could the fractional model of Quarks electric charge turn out to be false?
The delta baryons (also called delta resonances) are a family of subatomic hadron particles which have the symbols $\Delta^{++}$, $\Delta^{+}$, $\Delta^{0}$, and $\Delta^{−}$ and electric charges +2, +1, 0 and −1 elementary charge respectively.
"existence of the $\Delta^{++}$, with its unusual +2 electric charge, was a crucial clue in the development of the quark model."
* , three same quarks $\Delta^{++}=uuu$, and two electric charge, isn't it impossible?!.
* Could the fractional model of Quarks electric charge turn out to be false? (leptons don't have fractional electric charge)
Here are some resources to help you quit smoking:
Quarks do not exist. Everything is made up of positrons and electrons
All real free particles have a charge of -1 , 0, +1 - only quarks have fractional charges which I find unncessary since all particles could be made up of whole charge positrions and electrons. Can anyone cite a particle that could not be made up of positrons/electrons and must be made up of 1/3 charge fraction quarks?"
Fractional Electric Charges were not proposed by QCD, but by the quark model, which came beforehand.
QCD offered a number of inconclusive predictions, such as Color Force and Fractional Electric Charges, Wrong. Fractional Electric Charges were not proposed by QCD, but by the quark model, which came beforehand.
On the breakdown of Quarks fractional electric charge values.
this "thought" that Quarks have a fractional electric charge values may not be true!. according to <PERSON> research in the field of QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics) three times the elementary charge (depending on flavor) Up, Charm and Top Quarks (called Up-Type Quarks) have electric charge of zero! 0 (Which means Up- Type Quarks are uncharged ), while Down, Strange and Bottom Quarks (called Down- Type Quarks) just Could have a electric charge of plus or minus one! (+1, -1) in <PERSON>'s model down-type Quarks are results of electroweak interaction between charged leptons and anti leptons and Up-type Quarks, and this is the reason that Quarks do not have fractional electric charge values. Which means charge of hadron is not the sum of the charge of its constituent quarks, it is just sum of the charge of Down-Type Quarks..."
Nuclear Forces – part 2
In the early 1960’s when a physicist by the name of <PERSON> put forward the hypothesis for the existence of quarks, he speculated that the charge of an up quark was two thirds of a proton’s, and the down quark was one third of an electron’s charge. 1020
In this way a proton consisting of two ups and one down quark would have a charge of +2/3 +2/3 -1/3 = +1. The benefit of such fractional charges is that a neutron could then be said to consist of two downs and one up quark, giving it a net charge of -1/3 -1/3 +2/3 = 0; i.e. a neutral charge. I would suggest that this neutron model must surely be wrong. We know that a neutron decays into a proton and electron. For this model to be correct, it would require that a down quark transform itself into an up quark – changing both its charge type and strength from -1/3 to +2/3 – and that an electron essentially be produced from nowhere! Perhaps this is possible but a simple ‘neutron = proton + electron’ model seems far more likely...."
here is the solution:
If anyone can disprove the existence of three triplets of quarks for $u,u,u \neq \Delta^{++}$ or prove that $\Delta^{++}$ have electric charge of zero then fractional model of Quarks electric charge will breakdown!. 531