Possible.
The acceleration of gravity exerted by a spherically symmetric distribution of mass on an object on its surface is given by the good old: $$g_{planet}=G\frac{M_{planet}}{R_{planet}^2}=\frac{4}{3}\pi G\rho_{planet}R_{planet}$$
And the centripetal acceleration at the equator is given by: $$a=R_{planet}(\frac{2\pi}{T})^2$$
So, it's quite simple really. We have 3 factors we can play with:
* Increasing the density of the planet $\rho_{planet}$ increases gravity everywhere
* Increasing the radius $R_{planet}$ increases gravity everywhere and increases the fictional centrifugal "force"
* decreasing the rotational period $T$ (faster rotation) increases centrifugal "force" (by a lot)
And the good news is that all those 3 factors can more or less be changed independently:
* size and density can be independent: Mercury and earth have similar densities but Earth is bigger
* size and rotational speed: earth and mars have almost the same length of day, but earth is bigger
* density and rotational speed: Jupiter is twice as dense as Saturn but they have almost the same rotational period
conclusion: you can tune any of those 3 parameters to get what you want.
To talk numbers: If you want the apparent gravity to be n times stronger at the poles than at the equator, while maintaining 1g of apparent gravity at the equator, you can work out that you must satisfy the following relations: $$R_{planet}=\frac{ng}{\frac{4}{3}\pi G\rho_{planet}}\text{ and }R_{planet}(\frac{2\pi}{T})^2=(n-1)g $$
We're gonna want a pretty big planet (that helps in reducing the revolution speed that you will need). I will make it not too dense so that it gets a larger radius, I will take $\rho_{planet}=690kg/m^3$ (density of Saturn). 24
I will make it so that you get 2g at the pole and 1g at the equator. With the formulae above, we can then calculate the required radius and revolution period: $$R_{planet}=76300km$$ $$T=6h30$$
That's a pretty fast rotational speed, but it doesn;t seem implausible (the shortest day in our solar system is about 10h. You're less than twice as fast, seems reasonable to me)
So with those conditions, you would be twice as heavy at the poles. Probably difficult to walk for an untrained human 921