Background: Lung cancer has become an important disease threatening the public health world-wide. Surgical resection is the standard of care for treating non-small cell lung cancer in early stage. For decades, pulmonary lobectomy with lymph node dissection remains the gold standard of surgical approach. Pulmonary sublobar resection with pulmonary wedge resection or segmentectomy was reserved for the patients with high surgical risk, who were unsuitable for radical surgical resection. Pulmonary sublobar resection for tumor less than three centimeter was demonstrated to associated with higher risk of tumor recurrence or worsening survival outcome as compared to that done by lobectomy. 1 However, these data was which was not necessarily applicable to patients with early lung cancer with tumor of smaller size which was more frequently detected with the health screening test by CT scan in general population now. Although several retrospective studies has demonstrated that sublobar resection can offer a similar survival outcome after surgery as compared to that done by standard lobectomy once the tumor was smaller than two centimeter 2, there is still no consensus about the role of sublobar resection for these small early lung cancer. In general, there are several factors associating with higher risk of local recurrence which should be avoided for sublobar resection, including resection margin less than 2 cm or less than the diameter of the tumor itself 3, more obvious speculation in CT image or central location which makes it difficult to obtain adequate resection margin 4,5. Therefore, sublobar resection should be applied to the patients of early lung cancer when two cm of resection margin is achievable. The central location , obvious tumor infiltration in image study or presence of lymph node metastasis should be also avoided.