The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the safety and economic impact of ICD follow-up schedule with Home Monitoring in France. For this assessment, the investigation compares two groups: For the ACTIVE group, after a first follow-up, the patients are only followed by Home Monitoring and one follow-up per year. The ICD follow-up or therapeutic intervention will be primarily based and triggered on event reports reception and after cardio reports and IEGM-online analysis on internet site. The findings from this group will be compared to those of a group receiving standard of care (CONTROL group). Both patient groups will be followed for 27 months and will have Home Monitoring switched on. The data from the CONTROL group will not be presented online to the attending physician, but a retrospective analysis on differences between the two groups will be performed. The clinical study will analyse, the incidence of significant serious adverse events (composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac and device related SAE), the costs reduction, the home-monitoring workload, the quality of life, the incremental Costs/Effectiveness ratio, the patient willing-to-pay, the delay of Home Monitoring to manage adverse events, the sensitivity of Home Monitoring to detect ICD dysfunctions, the inappropriate therapies rate and impact on hospitalization, the number of ICD charge and impact on battery longevity.