In 2002, Chih-Chin Hsu et al. reported that CMT could be classified into four types. Type I denoted a heteroechoic mass in the affected muscles; Type II represented diffuse echogenic dots and lines against the hypoechoic background with no detectable mass. The alignment of perimysium appeared irregular instead of parallel on longitudinal sonograms; Type III indicated diffuse hyperechoic echogenicity along the entire muscle and almost no hypoechoic background could be seen; and Type IV had a hyperechoic band in the involved muscles. The study also evaluated the histology of each type of fibrosis. Type I and II fibrosis revealed hyperplastic fibrous tissue mingled with muscle fiber. Mature fibroblasts with complete absence of normal muscle tissue could be found in Type III fibrosis and the fibrotic bands in Type IV fibrosis. The majority of Type I and II fibrosis improved after conservative treatment. However, Type III and Type IV had more probability in need of surgical correction. However, this categorization lacks of objective and quantitative measurement and can be different by subjective judgement of different physicians. The purpose of this study is tried to perform digital analysis of ultrasonography images to establish an objective, quantitative method and to assess its relevance with clinical symptoms and prognosis.