Basically, ART appears to be an interesting treatment approach as it combines a manual cavity preparation technique with the use of a glass-ionomer cement as an adhesive and fluoride releasing restoration material. Biomechanical stress, however, is above-average in class IV restorations when intending to reconstruct the incisal edge with glass-ionomer cement resulting in reported high rates of restoration fractures or loss. It was therefore the aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a modified ART class IV restoration technique in a clinical study. These data are to be compared with an historical control (original ART class IV anatomical structure rebuilding restorations). Historical control data will be retrieved from "Jordan RA, Gaengler P, Markovic L, Zimmer S: Performance of Atraumatic Restorative Tratment (ART) depending on operator-experience. J Public Health Dent 2010; 70: 176-80."