The commonly used treatment methods for distal radius fracture include internal fixation with steel plate, internal fixation with Kirschner wire, and external fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has disadvantages. For example, the pronator teres is incised in palmar ORIF and in situ suturing of the muscle is not possible in most patients after implantation of the titanium plate. Even when suturing is possible, the strength of the pronator teres will decrease after surgery, and a second surgery is needed to remove the titanium plate. Dorsal ORIF is also disadvantageous because more tendons and thin soft tissue may be encountered during surgery. In addition, tendon sheath injury is inevitable, leading to myotenositis, tendon adhesion, and even tendon rupture. Thus, internal fixators should be taken out as early as possible. Satisfactory wrist function outcomes have been achieved with external fixators, in particular with dynamic external fixators. However, although external fixation has good fixing effects, it provides poor lateral stability, resulting in injury to the superficial branch of the radial nerve, screw channel infection, screw channel fracture, screw loosening, and even Sudeck's atrophy. Internal fixation with Kirschner wire generates minimal surgical trauma, but this technique does not provide sufficient strength for fixation and is therefore rarely used at present. There is an urgent need to develop a more stable fixation method for distal radius fracture. Minimally invasive surgery avoids the tissue damage and impairment of physiological function caused by open surgery because of its precise location techniques. Brachial plexus anesthesia allows surgeons to avoid large incisions and excessive bleeding. There are no palmar or dorsal incisions in minimally invasive surgery for distal radius fractures, so the structures surrounding the wrist joint are not iatrogenically damaged, which theoretically improves wrist function recovery.