4. By a letter dated 16 December 2005, the Representative stated his overall assessment that the choice of a Representative of the Secretary-General, with an explicit human rights mandate, as reflected in his title, and acting on the three-pronged basis of strengthening international response, engagement in coordinated international advocacy and engaging in dialogue with Governments and other actors, had been both an appropriate choice of mechanism and one that had resulted in clear, positive steps forward on a number of fronts.
4. By a letter dated 16 December 2005, the Representative stated his overall assessment that the choice of a Representative of the Secretary-General, with an explicit human rights mandate, as reflected in his title, and acting on the three-pronged basis of strengthening international response, engagement in coordinated international advocacy and engaging in dialogue with Governments and other actors, had been both an appropriate choice of mechanism and one that had resulted in clear, positive steps forward on a number of fronts.