Whereas, in reaction to the Special Rapporteur &apos; s questions, authorities remained ambiguous about the existence or mandate of JITEM, in a simultaneous court case in Diyarbakir, the court decided to have a case involving torture and ill-treatment transferred from an ordinary court to a military court, arguing that the case involved JITEM officers and spelling out the name of the entity.
Whereas, in reaction to the Special Rapporteur &apos; s questions, authorities remained ambiguous about the existence or mandate of JITEM, in a simultaneous court case in Diyarbakir, the court decided to have a case involving torture and ill-treatment transferred from an ordinary court to a military court, arguing that the case involved JITEM officers and spelling out the name of the entity.