As stated in the Government &apos; s first reply to the Working Group, no violations of due process (including the right to a fair trial) were found and, consequently, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided not to take up the case or state that there had been a violation of human rights, not only because it had no jurisdiction in the case ratione temporis8 but also because neither the Commission nor the representatives of the alleged victim had provided evidence of any infringements that could be identified as specific violations of the right to due process that could have been taken up by the Court.9
As stated in the Government &apos; s first reply to the Working Group, no violations of due process (including the right to a fair trial) were found and, consequently, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided not to take up the case or state that there had been a violation of human rights, not only because it had no jurisdiction in the case ratione temporis but also because neither the Commission nor the representatives of the alleged victim had provided evidence of any infringements that could be identified as specific violations of the right to due process that could have been taken up by the Court.