20. Well-documented allegations of diversion published by international media outlets[727] have been lent further credence by ‘third party’ monitors who have reported systematic interference with their work when trying to visit Saacid feeding sites including, but not restricted to, denial of access, physical abuse of beneficiaries and the “beautification of sites” during official monitoring visits by inflating the numbers of beneficiaries with people recruited from the street.[728]
20. Well-documented allegations of diversion published by international media outlets[727] have been lent further credence by ‘third party’ monitors who have reported systematic interference with their work when trying to visit Saacid feeding sites including, but not restricted to, denial of access, physical abuse of beneficiaries and the “beautification of sites” during official monitoring visits by inflating the numbers of beneficiaries with people recruited from the street.[728]