A teleological interpretation is also mandatory in Croatia &apos; s case, bearing in mind that Croatia was not able to intervene into the text of the Kyoto Protocol post festum upon adoption of decision 7/CP.12, thus avoiding a restrictive interpretation of Article 3, paragraph 5, of the Kyoto Protocol and decision 9/CP. 2, as currently applied by the EBCC.
A teleological interpretation is also mandatory in Croatia &apos; s case, bearing in mind that Croatia was not able to intervene into the text of the Kyoto Protocol post festum upon adoption of decision 7/CP.12, thus avoiding a restrictive interpretation of Article 3, paragraph 5, of the Kyoto Protocol and decision 9/CP. 2, as currently applied by the EBCC.