While the imposition of time limits has resulted in a reduction of the overall time spent in court, the Chamber has also acknowledged that Karadžić needs significantly more time for the cross-examination of each witness than the time used by the Prosecution in its examination-in-chief because almost every witness is led pursuant to Rule 92 ter, through which voluminous written evidence is introduced.
Cela a permis de réduire le temps d &apos; audience global, mais la Chambre a reconnu que Radovan Karadžić avait besoin, pour contre-interroger chacun des témoins, de beaucoup plus de temps que n &apos; en avait utilisé l &apos; Accusation pour l &apos; interrogatoire principal, car la grande majorité des témoignages avaient été présentés sous le régime de l &apos; article 92 ter du Règlement, ce qui suppose un volume considérable de documents.