The EBCC justified its position by stating that it has not been able to find grounds to apply the Croatian decision 7/CP.12 on the Kyoto Protocol, thus omitting the Slovenian case where Article 4.6 of the Convention provided a sufficient basis for the ERT and EBCC to acknowledge the flexibility and establish compliance with the Kyoto Protocol commitments.
The EBCC justified its position by stating that it has not been able to find grounds to apply the Croatian decision 7/CP.12 on the Kyoto Protocol, thus omitting the Slovenian case where Article 4.6 of the Convention provided a sufficient basis for the ERT and EBCC to acknowledge the flexibility and establish compliance with the Kyoto Protocol commitments.