Therefore, the same individual who advocated that flexibility for Croatia, as provided by decision 7/CP.12, could not be applied for the purpose of implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, was the same person who was directly involved in the consideration and elaboration of the upheld preliminary finding on Croatia.
Therefore, the same individual who advocated that flexibility for Croatia, as provided by decision 7/CP.12, could not be applied for the purpose of implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, was the same person who was directly involved in the consideration and elaboration of the upheld preliminary finding on Croatia.