grammatical interpretation, results in the following conclusions: (i) flexibility available to EIT Parties is limited solely to the use of a base year or period other than 1990 (no other form of flexibility is allowed), and (ii) flexibility is allowed only to four EIT Parties explicitly indentified in decision 9/CP.2 (no other Party may use flexibility under decision 9/CP.2), and (iii) no confirmation of the CMP or other Kyoto Protocol body is required for recognition of flexibilities granted under 9/CP.2 for the implementation of commitments under the Kyoto Protocol.
The EBCC &apos; s understanding of the relevant paragraph of the Kyoto Protocol, using very strict, inflexible and purely grammatical interpretation, results in the following conclusions: (i) flexibility available to EIT Parties is limited solely to the use of a base year or period other than 1990 (no other form of flexibility is allowed), and (ii) flexibility is allowed only to four EIT Parties explicitly indentified in decision 9/CP.2 (no other Party may use flexibility under decision 9/CP.2), and (iii) no confirmation of the CMP or other Kyoto Protocol body is required for recognition of flexibilities granted under 9/CP.2 for the implementation of commitments under the Kyoto Protocol.