The difference of opinion arises in that a Messenger is entrusted with a message, which is the command to warn and teach, and the proof of this opinion is also extracted from the same verse because of the two titles being kept separate, and if they both bore the same meaning then the question is asked what is the point of repeating them?
Eriarvamusitekib, et Messenger on usaldatud sõnum, mis on käsu hoiatada ja õpetada ning tõend selle arvamuse ka kaevandatud sama salmi, sest kaks pealkirjad hoitakse eraldi, ja kui nad mõlemad kandis sama tähendus siis küsitakse, mis mõte korrataneid?