Consequently, from the above we can deduce that the doubt expressed during the opening of the formal investigation procedure, in recital 44, which indicates that the charge for the slaughterhouses was a lot higher than for other beneficiaries of the service, had arisen from the information Belgium submitted on how the amount of this fee was invoiced to the producers.
Eelnevast võib seega järeldada, et ametliku uurimismenetluse algatamise ajal põhjenduses 44 väljendatud kahtluse, et tapamajadele puhul oli tasu palju kõrgem kui teiste teenuse saajate puhul, kõrvaldas teave, mille Belgia esitas selle teenustasu summa tootjate arvele kandmise kohta.