I have been advised that the precedent is as follows: where there is an oral amendment to an oral amendment, if the first person who tabled the oral amendment accepts the second oral amendment as a consensus, it is taken into account.
Mind on informeeritud, et pretsedent on järgmine: kui esitatakse suuline muudatusettepanek suulisele ettepanekule, siis võetakse see arvesse, kui esimene isik, kes suulise muudatusettepaneku esitas, nõustub konsensusena teise muudatusettepanekuga.