Accordingly, the applicants’ arguments raised in the context of the second plea, whereby they seek to challenge the appropriateness and proportionality of the relevant criteria governing the calculation of the RES payments in so far, in particular, as they give rise, in the applicants’ submission, to an allocation of the costs linked with inefficiency to the advantage of the PMI in receipt of those payments (see paragraph 138 above), must be rejected as unfounded.
Seega tuleb põhjendamatuse tõttu tagasi lükata hagejate teise väite raames esitatud argumendid, milles soovitakse kahtluse alla seada RES maksete arvutamist käsitlevate kriteeriumide sobivus ja proportsionaalsus, kuna need tekitavad hagejate arvates tõhususega seotud kulude jagamise neid makseid saava ERK kindlustusandja kasuks (vt eespool punkt 138).