As the Court of First Instance found in paragraphs 42 to 60 of its judgment, all the applicants were individually concerned by the contested decision because they had made individual requests for authorisation for extra safety tonnage, because those requests were submitted and examined on a case-by-case basis, and because they were individually identified as the owners of the vessels listed in Annex II to the decision.
Nagu sedastas Esimese Astme Kohus vaidlustatud kohtuotsuse punktides 42–60, puudutas vaidlustatud otsus kõiki hagejaid isiklikult, kuna nad esitasid individuaalsed ohutuse tonnaaži suurendamise taotlused, kuna need taotlused esitati ja neid uuriti eraldi ning kuna hagejad olid igaüks eraldi määratletud otsuse II lisas nimetatud laevade omanikena.