In particular, the Commission was unable to establish with certainty, in the light of the situation in both the motor vehicle sector and the company which was experiencing certain financial difficulties [9], firstly, that the assumptions of the restructuring plan were credible, realistic and prudent, secondly, that the valuation of Trèves prior to the investment was prudent and, thirdly, that the prospect of an internal rate of return (below: ‘IRR’) of [> 12 %] [10] was to be considered sufficient in view of the risk assumed by the FMEA.
Võttes arvesse olukorda nii autotööstuses kui ka äriühingus, mis oli teatavates rahalistes raskustes, [9] ei ole komisjonil võimalik kinnitada esiteks seda, kas ümberkorralduskava eeldused olid usaldusväärsed, realistlikud ja ettevaatlikud, teiseks seda, kas äriühingu Trèves vara hindamine enne investeeringu tegemist oli ettevaatlik, ning kolmandaks, kas [> 12 %]-list [10] sisemise tasuvusläve väljavaadet võib pidada FMEA võetud riski puhul piisavaks.