Next, it appears at the least paradoxical to maintain, as does the ECB, that the applicant received two documents — other than those referred to above — containing information which ‘well represents the Basle/Nyborg Agreement in its entirety’, while refusing the applicant access to that agreement on the ground, stated in its written pleadings, that its wording is confidential.
Seejärel tuleb esile tuua, et tundub vähemalt paradoksaalne väita EKP kombel, et hageja on saanud kaks dokumenti, mis ei ole ülalnimetatud dokumendid, kuid sisaldavad teavet, mis „kujutab endast kogu Basel-Nyborgi kokkulepet”, keeldudes samas sellega tutvumise võimaldamisest, mida ta põhjendab oma märkustes selle konfidentsiaalse sisuga.