Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2007 in Case T-491/04 Merant v OHIM, by which that Court annulled decision R 542/2002-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 October 2004 upholding an action against the opposition decision which partially rejected the application for registration of Community word mark ‘FOCUS’ for goods and services in classes 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41 and 42 in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the national figurative mark ‘MICRO FOCUS’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 41 and 42 — Likelihood of confusion between two marks.
Apellatsioonkaebus Esimese Astme Kohtu (kolmas koda) 16. mai 2007. aasta otsuse peale kohtuasjas T-491/04: Merant vs. Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet, millega Esimese Astme Kohus tühistas Siseturu Ühtlustamise Ameti teise apellatsioonikoja 18. oktoobri 2004. aasta otsuse R 542/2002-2, millega rahuldati kaebus vastulausete osakonna otsuse peale, millega lükati osaliselt tagasi taotlus registreerida ühenduse sõnamärk „FOCUS” kaupadele ja teenustele klassides 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41 ja 42 vastulausemenetluses, mille algatas siseriikliku kujutismärgi „MICRO FOCUS” kaupadele ja teenustele klassides 9, 16, 41 ja 42 omanik – Kahe kaubamärgi segiajamise tõenäosus.