The Commission supposes that this is a rhetorical shortcut on the part of the FPAP, designed to show that the action taken by the FPAP reducing the running costs of fisheries undertakings, given the system of payment by giving employees a share of the profit, ultimately benefits the employees of these undertakings. In that sense the action could be regarded as ‘direct social assistance’.
Komisjon arvab, et käesoleval juhul on pigem tegemist retoorilise žestiga, millega kalapüügiriskide ennetamise fond tahab näidata, et fondi tegevus kalandusettevõtjate tootmiskulude hüvitamisel (arvestades meremeeste tasustamist „osa järgi”) toob lõppkokkuvõttes tulu nende ettevõtete töötajatele.