وفيما يتعلق بالحجة القائلة إن صاحب البلاغ لم يحصل على مترجم فوري في المحكمة وإنه قد تضرر من ناحية عدم فهمه فهماً كاملاً لقضية التاج وفيما يتعلق بإدلائه بإفادته الشخصية، رأت محكمة الاستئناف أنه لم تكن هناك حجج معقولة تؤيد الاستئناف.
In any event, in the opinion of the State party, if the author persists in his view that the administration has not fully taken on board the 6 July 2001 ruling and has not correctly upgraded his file, it is for him to apply once again to the Strasbourg administrative court for annulment of the above-mentioned order of 19 October 2001. Yet, as far as the State party is aware, the author has not done so. Hence the communication is inadmissible under articles 2 and 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Protocol.