So, it seems, complexity is not really naturally selected, but instead arises as a short-term fix to the effects of selection inefficiency. At first reading, this assertion seems counterintuitive, but the root of the paradox is simply our dogmatic way of thinking, where complex traits are expected to be an outcome of natural selection.
因此，复杂性似乎并不是真正的自然选择，而是一种对选择无效性的短期修复。乍看上去，这一观点似乎是反直觉的，但这一悖论的根源在于我们教条主义的思维方式，我们先入为主地认定复杂性应该是自然选择的结果。