Many kinds of pushback can be expected, not least the argument that the veto exists not to protect the P5’s interests, but to ensure unanimity of the major players (conspicuously missing in the UN’s ill-fated predecessor, the League of Nations) in any action undertaken, in order to maintain international peace and security. We will be told that it is unconscionable to ask a P5 member to forgo a veto when it genuinely believes that a proposed resolution will cause more harm than good.
可以预期会遇到各种阻力，比如有人会提出否决权的存在不是为了保护“五常”的利益，而是为了保证所有行动上重要行动方的一致性（联合国命运多舛的前身国际联盟就显然缺少这一点），从而维持国际和平与安全。我们会被告知，要求“五常”在其真正认为决议议案利大于弊时放弃否决权是不合情理的。