While scientific evidence over the last three decades has undermined the shaken baby hypothesis, no new evidence has emerged to support it. Instead, several researchers have relied upon the data in older studies to calculate the statistical probability of inflicted brain injury when certain features (such as intracranial hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage, brain swelling, and seizures) are present.
过去三十年来的科学证据不支持抖动婴儿假说，也没有新证据出现支持它。相反，一些研究者根据旧研究中的数据计算出现某些特征（如颅内出血、视网膜出血、脑水肿和癫痫）情况下的大脑损伤的统计概率。这些概率常常被用于诊断依据和法庭证据。