Herndon, Ash, and Pollin argue that the results obtained by Reinhart and Rogoff are based on coding errors and questionable methodological choices. But, after all their quibbles, their paper weakens but does not refute the Reinhart/Rogoff paper’s main result.
赫恩顿、阿什和波林指出，莱因哈特和罗格夫的结果来自代码错误和有问题的方法选择。但是，尽管三人文字犀利，但他们的论文只是削弱而不能推翻莱/罗论文的主要结果。那么，为什么这会引起轩然大波？