The plaintiffs argue that, in the case of Greece, breaching Article 125 required proof that its insolvency would pose a greater danger than anticipated when the Maastricht Treaty was drafted. However, no such proof was provided.
原告指出，在希腊的案例中，对马约第125条的违反需要有希腊破产将产生比马约起草时所预料到的情况更大的危险的证明。但是，希腊案例并没有提供这类证明。