The fundamental problem with the ICJ’s decision is its unrealistically high standard of proof for finding Serbia to have been legally complicit in genocide. After all, one can also be guilty of complicity in a crime by not stopping it while having both the duty and the power to do so, and when, through one’s inaction, one decisively contributes to the creation of conditions that enable the crime to take place.
国际法院的裁决的最根本的问题在于它为找到塞尔维亚在种族灭绝中在法律上属于串通共谋的证据设定了高得不现实的标准。不管怎样，如果一个人既有义务又有权力去阻止一起犯罪却没有去阻止，并且因为他的不作为，从而为犯罪的发生决定性地创造了有利的条件，那么他就是共犯。