Second, there was widespread agreement about what had caused the breakdown of consensus in the Security Council concerning how to respond to events in Syria (at least until the use of chemical weapons in August proved to be a game changer). The cause was not an attempt by the global South to revive outdated notions of unlimited sovereignty; rather, it was a reaction to the perceived overreach of the NATO-led military intervention in Libya in 2011.
其次，对于什么导致了安理会在如何应对叙利亚发生的事件（至少在8月份化学武器的使用让局面出现逆转之前）上迟迟无法达成一致，北京的会议形成了广泛的一致意见。其原因不在于南方国家试图让早已过时的无限制主权概念死灰复燃；而在于人们认为北约领导的2011年利比亚军事干预过度而引起了反弹。