As a result, taxpayers may need to pay twice, once for the bailout and again for the low-quality debt they have incurred during the bailout, as the austerity programs unveiled in Europe attest. Paradoxically, the growing sense that a catastrophe has been averted has given rise to a growing demand for governments to cut public and social spending, and to refrain from proposing investment programs.
结果纳税人就必须为此付两次钱，一次是给拯救计划，而第二次是给拯救计划中所担负下来的那些劣质债务，正如欧洲披露的紧缩计划所证明的那样。矛盾的是,，那种大灾已过的思想令公众不断要求政府削减公共和社会支出，并停止出台投资项目。人们又重新投身于原先导致危机的政策当中。