In other words, the strategic government intervention needed to ensure macroeconomic stability was not only straightforward, but also minimal: the authorities need only manage a steady rate of money-supply growth. The aggressive and comprehensive intervention that Keynesians claimed was needed to manage aggregate demand, and that Minskyites claimed was needed to manage financial risk, was entirely unwarranted.
换句话说，确保宏观经济稳定的战略性政府干预不但是直观的，而且是程度最低的：当局只需要维持稳定的货币供应增长即可。凯恩斯主义者宣称的激进全面的干预是为了管理总需求，而明斯基主义式的干预是为了管理金融风险，它们都不能保证取得成效。