Why keep such an anachronistic construct alive when the world is no longer frozen into two ideologically antagonistic blocs? Furthermore, given the proliferation of strategic partnerships that claim many NAM members (India, for example, has strategic partnerships with the United States, Japan, and Brazil), are the non-aligned really still non-aligned?
在伊朗首都举行首脑会议是否明智的争议重新激发了有关冷战后世界“不结盟”涵义的核心辩论。如果世界已经不再被僵化地割裂为意识形态对立的两大军事集团，为什么还要延续这样一种不合时宜的结构？此外，鉴于越来越多的不结盟成员国已经建立了战略伙伴关系（比方说印度与美国、日本与巴西已经建立了战略伙伴关系），不结盟运动是否还是真正意义上的不结盟？