Is it treason to question throwing huge sums of money at a policy that will do virtually no good in a hundred years? Is it unreasonable to point out that the inevitable creation of trade barriers that will ensue from Waxman-Markey could eventually cost the world ten times more than the damage climate change could ever have wrought?
照这样说，质疑这一法案的正当性是不是就是“背叛地球罪”？是不是质疑这个耗资巨大却在百年以内都得不到好处的政策就是背叛？是不是指出华克斯曼-马基气候变化法案所产生的贸易壁垒将最终令全球付出比气候变化多十倍的成本就是蛮不讲理？