If it does, we have all the reason we need to retain it; but if it does not, don’t we have as much power and as much right to change the arrangements under which we are governed as the framers had to prescribe them in the first place? If we do, why should provisions that make the constitution so difficult to amend bind a majority of the electorate?
如果答案是肯定的，我们就有充分的理由认为需要维持它；但如果答案是否定的，难道我们不应该拥有改变这一让我们根据宪法缔造者一开始所规定的内容被统治的安排的权力和权利？如果我们有这一权力和权利，那么为何还要让修宪变得如此困难的条款约束绝大部分选民？