Far better, proponents of wage insurance argue, for the training to be carried out by an employer who wants a job done and knows what the employee needs to learn. It seems plausible that two years is long enough for retraining, after which the employee might command a higher wage without a government subsidy.
与传统的政府推行的职业培训计划相比，工资保险不失为在职培训更为有效的补助方式，这是工资保险的一大优势。计划参与者在完成了政府发起的计划后，往往发现自己不可能找到培训计划所承诺的，报酬较高的工作。工资保险的倡议者辩论说，培训如果由想让员工完成某一工作的雇主来进行，情况会好得多，因为雇主了解到底员工需要学习什么。两年时间，对再培训来说也够长了。两年以后，员工可能不需要政府补贴便能拿到更高的工资，这似乎也合情合理。