While the discussion of the Geneva Conventions and procedural rights is important, the more profound portion of Justice John Paul Stevens’ majority opinion addresses the boundaries of the law of war, and specifically whether the conspiracy charge against Hamdan constitutes a violation of this body of customary international law.
虽然有关日内瓦公约和程序性权利的讨论具有重要意义，但是，史蒂文斯法官的多数意见中更为深刻的部分涉及到了战争法的适用范围，特别是对哈姆丹的同谋指控是否违反了习惯国际法中这方面的法规。