From this perspective, once Buffett earned his first few millions in the 1960’s, his efforts to accumulate more money can easily seem completely pointless. Is Buffett a victim of the “deception” that Adam Smith described, and that Kahneman and his colleagues have studied in more depth?
根据这种观点，当巴菲特在60年代挣到他的一开始的几百万美元后，他积累更多金钱的努力似乎可以很轻易地被看作是完全没有意义的。那么巴菲特是亚当·史密斯所描述的、以及卡尼曼和他的同事进行更深入研究的那个“幻象”的牺牲品吗？