Of course, the sins of the father should never be visited on the son. But, in this case, when the son borrows essential elements of his father’s architectural principles and serves a regime that seeks to use the Games for some of the same reasons that animated Hitler, is he not willingly reflecting those sins?
当然，父亲的罪过不应该落到儿子的头上。但是当儿子继承了他的父亲建筑原理的核心思想，并且把它用来服务一个寻求用某些曾驱使希特勒的理由来利用奥运会的政权时，你能说他没有有意地表现那些罪过吗？