But to call T3 a success for socialism and T5 a failure of capitalism would be to miss a fundamental point. After all, if China’s political system can still be called socialism, it is at best “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” which embodies an increasing amount of market-oriented economic activity and greater economic openness and transparency.
但是如果简单地把北京T3称之为社会主义的成功、而把伦敦T5称之为资本主义的失败，恐怕失之偏颇。归根结底，中国的政治制度已经是“有中国特色的社会主义”，包含着越来越多的市场经济的成分，经济开放和透明度也在日益增加。