A striking difference between Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and Tunisia’s Ennahda, on the one hand, and Libya’s Islamists on the other is the level of institutionalization and interaction with the masses. In Qaddafi’s four decades in power, Libya’s Islamists could not build local support networks; develop organizational structures, hierarchies, or institutions; or create a parallel system of clinics and social services, as their counterparts in Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, and Jordan were able to do.
一方面，利比亚伊斯兰主义者与埃及穆斯林兄弟会和突尼斯复兴运动党（Ennahda）有一个显著不同——制度化水平和群众互动。在卡扎菲四十年的统治生涯中，利比亚伊斯兰主义者无法建立地方支持网络；没能发展组织结构、层级和制度；也没有建立起诊疗和社会服务体系，而这些东西埃及、突尼斯、摩洛哥和约旦都做到了。