Second, to address existing regulatory conflicts, the FMLC recommends establishing a “conflict of regulation” framework to determine which legal regime – that of a global firm’s home country or that of its local subsidiary’s host country – has jurisdiction in a specific cross-border dispute. The alternative of relying on a third-party multilateral organization to act as mediator in such disputes, the report explains, has little support from G-20 countries.
其次，要解决当前的监管冲突，FMLC建议成立“监管冲突“框架以决定哪种法律机制——以跨国企业的母国为准还是以当地分支所在国为准——对具体的跨境纠纷拥有司法权。FMLC报告解释道，替代方案——依靠第三方多边组织作为这类纠纷的调停者——得不到G-20国家的支持。