In a planned economy like China’s, where policymakers use various tools to influence asset prices, such instability could, in theory, be avoided; indeed, the Marxist view is that government intervention to stop crises is precisely why controlled economies are superior to their free-market counterparts. But, in practice, that does not seem to be the case.
在像中国这样的计划经济中，决策者用各种工具影响资产价格，理论上，这一不稳定可以避免；事实上，马克思主义观点认为，阻止危机的政府干预正是管制经济优于自由市场经济的要害。但在实践中似乎并非如此。