In withdrawing his conclusion that there was a policy of intentional targeting of civilians by Israel, Goldstone has not said that his judgment, based on the evidence before him at the time, was wrong.
En retirant sa conclusion sur l’existence d’une politique israélienne d’intentionnalité ciblant les civils, Goldstone ne disait pas que sa conclusion, fondée sur les preuves dont il avait connaissance à l’époque, était une erreur.