Question: I found this news title. Can you represent it to find an explanatory news article?:

Question: Slouching Toward Mar-a-Lago

represent the article to find a fitting news title Fewshot example: "['This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title', "'He's a good kisser!' Scott Disick's blonde party pal, 22, opens up about what really happened in Vegas... and how he took her back to his penthouse"]" == "['Represent the title to find an explanatory news article', 'Champions Trophy: England vs Pakistan Scoreboard']"

by Andrew J. Bacevich
Like it or not, the president of the United States embodies America itself. The individual inhabiting the White House has become the preeminent symbol of who we are and what we represent as a nation and a people. In a fundamental sense, he is us.
It was not always so. Millard Fillmore, the 13th president (1850-1853), presided over but did not personify the American republic. He was merely the federal chief executive. Contemporary observers did not refer to his term in office as the Age of Fillmore. With occasional exceptions, Abraham Lincoln in particular, much the same could be said of Fillmore’s successors. They brought to office low expectations, which they rarely exceeded. So when Chester A. Arthur (1881-1885) or William Howard Taft (1909-1913) left the White House, there was no rush to immortalize them by erecting gaudy shrines — now known as “presidential libraries” — to the glory of their presidencies. In those distant days, ex-presidents went back home or somewhere else where they could find work.
Over the course of the past century, all that has changed. Ours is a republic that has long since taken on the trappings of a monarchy, with the president inhabiting rarified space as our king-emperor. The Brits have their woman in Buckingham Palace. We have our man in the White House.
Nominally, the Constitution assigns responsibilities and allocates prerogatives to three co-equal branches of government. In practice, the executive branch enjoys primacy. Prompted by a seemingly endless series of crises since the Great Depression and World War II, presidents have accumulated ever-greater authority, partly through usurpation, but more often than not through forfeiture.
At the same time, they also took on various extra-constitutional responsibilities. By the beginning of the present century, Americans took it for granted that the occupant of the Oval Office should function as prophet, moral philosopher, style-setter, interpreter of the prevailing zeitgeist, and — last but hardly least — celebrity-in-chief. In short, POTUS was the bright star at the center of the American solar system.
As recently as a year ago, few saw in this cult of the presidency cause for complaint. On odd occasions, some particularly egregious bit of executive tomfoolery might trigger grumbling about an “imperial presidency.” Yet rarely did such complaints lead to effective remedial action. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 might be considered the exception that proves the rule. Inspired by the disaster of the Vietnam War and intended to constrain presidents from using force without congressional buy-in and support, that particular piece of legislation ranks alongside the Volstead Act of 1919(enacted to enforce Prohibition) as among the least effective ever to become law.
In truth, influential American institutions — investment banks and multinational corporations, churches and universities, big city newspapers and TV networks, the bloated national security apparatus and both major political parties — have found reason aplenty to endorse a system that elevates the president to the status of demigod. By and large, it’s been good for business, whatever that business happens to be.
Furthermore, it’s our president — not some foreign dude — who is, by common consent, the most powerful person in the universe. For inhabitants of a nation that considers itself both “exceptional” and “indispensable,” this seems only right and proper. So Americans generally like it that their president is the acknowledged Leader of the Free World rather than some fresh-faced pretender from France or Canada.
Then came the Great Hysteria. Arriving with a Pearl Harbor-like shock, it erupted on the night of November 8, 2016, just as the news that Hillary Clinton was losing Florida and appeared certain to lose much else besides became apparent.
Suddenly, all the habits and precedents that had contributed to empowering the modern American presidency no longer made sense. That a single deeply flawed individual along with a handful of unelected associates and family members should be entrusted with determining the fate of the planet suddenly seemed the very definition of madness.
Emotion-laden upheavals producing behavior that is not entirely rational are hardly unknown in the American experience. Indeed, they recur with some frequency. The Great Awakenings of the eighteenth and early nineteenthcenturies are examples of the phenomenon. So also are the two Red Scares of the twentieth century, the first in the early 1920s and the second, commonly known as “McCarthyism,” coinciding with the onset of the Cold War.
Yet the response to Donald Trump’s election, combining as it has fear, anger, bewilderment, disgust, and something akin to despair, qualifies as an upheaval without precedent. History itself had seemingly gone off the rails. The crude Andrew Jackson’s 1828 ousting of an impeccably pedigreed president, John Quincy Adams, was nothing compared to the vulgar Donald Trump’s defeat of an impeccably credentialed graduate of Wellesley and Yale who had served as first lady, United States senator, and secretary of state. A self-evidently inconceivable outcome — all the smart people agreed on that point — had somehow happened anyway.
A vulgar, bombastic, thrice-married real-estate tycoon and reality TV host as prophet, moral philosopher, style-setter, interpreter of the prevailing zeitgeist, and chief celebrity? The very idea seemed both absurd and intolerable.
If we have, as innumerable commentators assert, embarked upon the Age of Trump, the defining feature of that age might well be the single-minded determination of those horrified and intent on ensuring its prompt termination. In 2016, TIME magazine chose Trump as its person of the year. In 2017, when it comes to dominating the news, that “person” might turn out to be a group — all those fixated on cleansing the White House of Trump’s defiling presence.
Egged on and abetted in every way by Trump himself, the anti-Trump resistance has made itself the Big Story. Lies, hate, collusion, conspiracy, fascism: rarely has the everyday vocabulary of American politics been as ominous and forbidding as over the past six months. Take resistance rhetoric at face value and you might conclude that Donald Trump is indeed the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, his presence in the presidential saddle eclipsing all other concerns. Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death will just have to wait.
The unspoken assumption of those most determined to banish him from public life appears to be this: once he’s gone, history will be returned to its intended path, humankind will breathe a collective sigh of relief, and all will be well again. Yet such an assumption strikes me as remarkably wrongheaded — and not merely because, should Trump prematurely depart from office, Mike Pence will succeed him. Expectations that Trump’s ouster will restore normalcy ignore the very factors that first handed him the Republican nomination (with a slew of competitors wondering what hit them) and then put him in the Oval Office (with a vastly more seasoned and disciplined, if uninspiring, opponent left to bemoan the injustice of it all).
Not all, but many of Trump’s supporters voted for him for the same reason that people buy lottery tickets: Why not? In their estimation, they had little to lose. Their loathing of the status quo is such that they may well stick with Trump even as it becomes increasingly obvious that his promise of salvation — an America made “great again” — is not going to materialize.
Yet those who imagine that Trump’s removal will put things right are likewise deluding themselves. To persist in thinking that he defines the problem is to commit an error of the first order. Trump is not cause, but consequence.
For too long, the cult of the presidency has provided an excuse for treating politics as a melodrama staged at four-year intervals and centering on hopes of another Roosevelt or Kennedy or Reagan appearing as the agent of American deliverance. Donald Trump’s ascent to the office once inhabited by those worthies should demolish such fantasies once and for all.
How is it that someone like Trump could become president in the first place? Blame sexism, Fox News, James Comey, Russian meddling, and Hillary’s failure to visit Wisconsin all you want, but a more fundamental explanation is this: the election of 2016 constituted a de facto referendum on the course of recent American history. That referendum rendered a definitive judgment: the underlying consensus informing U.S. policy since the end of the Cold War has collapsed. Precepts that members of the policy elite have long treated as self-evident no longer command the backing or assent of the American people. Put simply: it’s the ideas, stupid.
Rabbit Poses a Question
“Without the Cold War, what’s the point of being an American?” As the long twilight struggle was finally winding down, Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom, novelist John Updike’s late-twentieth-century Everyman, pondered that question. In short order, Rabbit got his answer. So, too, after only perfunctory consultation, did his fellow citizens.
The passing of the Cold War offered cause for celebration. On that point all agreed. Yet, as it turned out, it did not require reflection from the public at large. Policy elites professed to have matters well in hand. The dawning era, they believed, summoned Americans not to think anew, but to keep doing precisely what they were accustomed to doing, albeit without fretting further about Communist takeovers or the risks of nuclear Armageddon. In a world where a “single superpower” was calling the shots, utopia was right around the corner. All that was needed was for the United States to demonstrate the requisite confidence and resolve.
Three specific propositions made up the elite consensus that coalesced during the initial decade of the post-Cold-War era. According to the first, the globalization of corporate capitalism held the key to wealth creation on a hitherto unimaginable scale. According to the second, jettisoning norms derived from Judeo-Christian religious traditions held the key to the further expansion of personal freedom. According to the third, muscular global leadership exercised by the United States held the key to promoting a stable and humane international order.
Unfettered neoliberalism plus the unencumbered self plus unabashed American assertiveness: these defined the elements of the post-Cold-War consensus that formed during the first half of the 1990s — plus what enthusiasts called the information revolution. The miracle of that “revolution,” gathering momentum just as the Soviet Union was going down for the count, provided the secret sauce that infused the emerging consensus with a sense of historical inevitability.
The Cold War itself had fostered notable improvements in computational speed and capacity, new modes of communication, and techniques for storing, accessing, and manipulating information. Yet, however impressive, such developments remained subsidiary to the larger East-West competition. Only as the Cold War receded did they move from background to forefront. For true believers, information technology came to serve a quasi-theological function, promising answers to life’s ultimate questions. Although God might be dead, Americans found in Bill Gates and Steve Jobs nerdy but compelling idols.
More immediately, in the eyes of the policy elite, the information revolution meshed with and reinforced the policy consensus. For those focused on the political economy, it greased the wheels of globalized capitalism, creating vast new opportunities for trade and investment. For those looking to shed constraints on personal freedom, information promised empowerment, making identity itself something to choose, discard, or modify. For members of the national security apparatus, the information revolution seemed certain to endow the United States with seemingly unassailable military capabilities. That these various enhancements would combine to improve the human condition was taken for granted; that they would, in due course, align everybody — from Afghans to Zimbabweans — with American values and the American way of life seemed more or less inevitable.
The three presidents of the post-Cold-War era — Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama — put these several propositions to the test. Politics-as-theater requires us to pretend that our 42nd, 43rd, and 44th presidents differed in fundamental ways. In practice, however, their similarities greatly outweighed any of those differences. Taken together, the administrations over which they presided collaborated in pursuing a common agenda, each intent on proving that the post-Cold-War consensus could work in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.
To be fair, it did work for some. “Globalization” made some people very rich indeed. In doing so, however, it greatly exacerbated inequality, while doing nothing to alleviate the condition of the American working class and underclass.
The emphasis on diversity and multiculturalism improved the status of groups long subjected to discrimination. Yet these advances have done remarkably little to reduce the alienation and despair pervading a society suffering from epidemics of chronic substance abuse, morbid obesity, teen suicide, and similar afflictions. Throw in the world’s highest incarceration rate, a seemingly endless appetite for porn, urban school systems mired in permanent crisis, and mass shootings that occur with metronomic regularity, and what you have is something other than the profile of a healthy society.
As for militarized American global leadership, it has indeed resulted in various bad actors meeting richly deserved fates. Goodbye, Saddam. Good riddance, Osama. Yet it has also embroiled the United States in a series of costly, senseless, unsuccessful, and ultimately counterproductive wars. As for the vaunted information revolution, its impact has been ambiguous at best, even if those with eyeballs glued to their personal electronic devices can’t tolerate being offline long enough to assess the actual costs of being perpetually connected.
In November 2016, Americans who consider themselves ill served by the post-Cold-War consensus signaled that they had had enough. Voters not persuaded that neoliberal economic policies, a culture taking its motto from the Outback steakhouse chain, and a national security strategy that employs the U.S. military as a global police force were working to their benefit provided a crucial margin in the election of Donald Trump.
The response of the political establishment to this extraordinary repudiation testifies to the extent of its bankruptcy. The Republican Party still clings to the notion that reducing taxes, cutting government red tape, restricting abortion, curbing immigration, prohibiting flag-burning, and increasing military spending will alleviate all that ails the country. Meanwhile, to judge by the promises contained in their recently unveiled (and instantly forgotten) program for a “Better Deal,” Democrats believe that raising the minimum wage, capping the cost of prescription drugs, and creating apprenticeship programs for the unemployed will return their party to the good graces of the American electorate.
In both parties embarrassingly small-bore thinking prevails, with Republicans and Democrats equally bereft of fresh ideas. Each party is led by aging hacks. Neither has devised an antidote to the crisis in American politics signified by the nomination and election of Donald Trump.
While our emperor tweets, Rome itself fiddles.
Starting Over
I am by temperament a conservative and a traditionalist, wary of revolutionary movements that more often than not end up being hijacked by nefarious plotters more interested in satisfying their own ambitions than in pursuing high ideals. Yet even I am prepared to admit that the status quo appears increasingly untenable. Incremental change will not suffice. The challenge of the moment is to embrace radicalism without succumbing to irresponsibility.
The one good thing we can say about the election of Donald Trump — to borrow an image from Thomas Jefferson — is this: it ought to serve as a fire bell in the night. If Americans have an ounce of sense, the Trump presidency will cure them once and for all of the illusion that from the White House comes redemption. By now we ought to have had enough of de facto monarchy.
By extension, Americans should come to see as intolerable the meanness, corruption, and partisan dysfunction so much in evidence at the opposite end of Pennsylvania Avenue. We need not wax sentimental over the days when Lyndon Johnson and Everett Dirksen presided over the Senate to conclude that Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer represent something other than progress. If Congress continues to behave as contemptibly as it has in recent years (and in recent weeks), it will, by default, allow the conditions that have produced Trump and his cronies to prevail.
So it’s time to take another stab at an approach to governance worthy of a democratic republic. Where to begin? I submit that Rabbit Angstrom’s question offers a place to start: What’s the point of being an American?
Authentic progressives and principled conservatives will offer different answers to Rabbit’s query. My own answer is rooted in an abiding conviction that our problems are less quantitative than qualitative. Rather than simply more — yet more wealth, more freedom, more attempts at global leadership — the times call for different. In my view, the point of being an American is to participate in creating a society that strikes a balance between wants and needs, that exists in harmony with nature and the rest of humankind, and that is rooted in an agreed upon conception of the common good.
My own prescription for how to act upon that statement of purpose is unlikely to find favor with most readers of TomDispatch. But therein lies the basis for an interesting debate, one that is essential to prospects for stemming the accelerating decay of American civic life.
Initiating such a debate, and so bringing into focus core issues, will remain next to impossible, however, without first clearing away the accumulated debris of the post-Cold-War era. Preliminary steps in that direction, listed in no particular order, ought to include the following:
First, abolish the Electoral College. Doing so will preclude any further occurrence of the circumstances that twice in recent decades cast doubt on the outcome of national elections and thereby did far more than any foreign interference to undermine the legitimacy of American politics.
Second, rollback gerrymandering. Doing so will help restore competitive elections and make incumbency more tenuous.
Third, limit the impact of corporate money on elections at all levels, if need be by amending the Constitution.
Fourth, mandate a balanced federal budget, thereby demolishing the pretense that Americans need not choose between guns and butter.
Fifth, implement a program of national service, thereby eliminating the All-Volunteer military and restoring the tradition of the citizen-soldier. Doing so will help close the gap between the military and society and enrich the prevailing conception of citizenship. It might even encourage members of Congress to think twice before signing off on wars that the commander-in-chief wants to fight.
Sixth, enact tax policies that will promote greater income equality.
Seventh, increase public funding for public higher education, thereby ensuring that college remains an option for those who are not well-to-do.
Eighth, beyond mere “job” creation, attend to the growing challenges of providing meaningful work — employment that is both rewarding and reasonably remunerative — for those without advanced STEM degrees.
Ninth, end the thumb-twiddling on climate change and start treating it as the first-order national security priority that it is.
Tenth, absent evident progress on the above, create a new party system, breaking the current duopoly in which Republicans and Democrats tacitly collaborate to dictate the policy agenda and restrict the range of policy options deemed permissible.
These are not particularly original proposals and I do not offer them as a panacea. They may, however, represent preliminary steps toward devising some new paradigm to replace a post-Cold-War consensus that, in promoting transnational corporate greed, mistaking libertinism for liberty, and embracing militarized neo-imperialism as the essence of statecraft, has paved the way for the presidency of Donald Trump.
We can and must do better. But doing so will require that we come up with better and truer ideas to serve as a foundation for American politics.
Reprinted, with permission, from TomDispatch.
Andrew J. Bacevich, a TomDispatch regular, is the author of America’s War for the Greater Middle East: A Military History, now out in paperback. His next book will be an interpretive history of the United States from the end of the Cold War to the election of Donald Trump.

Intergalactic death metal band The Beast Of Nod has released their debut album, Vampira: Disciple Of Chaos with an accompanying comic book for fans of sci-fi and vicious metal. To showcase the Boston based group's unique style and musical vision, they've also released a lyric video for the single "Behold! ... But Beware The Celestial Cetaceans!"
Tracklisting:
“A Prison Of Ice”
“The Vanishing Commutator”
“PotRoast The Rhinoman”
“Ripped Off Face II: The Cape Of Faces”
“Behold!...But Beware The Celestical Cetaceans!”
“T.C.T.W.A.D.M.L.C. (The Cybernetic Tiger With A Dorsal-Mounted Laser Cannon)”
“Vampira Infernalis”
“The Phoenix Nebula”
"Behold!...But Beware The Celestical Cetaceans!” lyric video:


Question:
represent the title to find an explanatory news article

------

E.g. ['I found this news title. Can you represent it to find an explanatory news article?', "S. Korea certain N. Korean leader's brother killed in Malaysia"] == ['represent the article to find a fitting news title!', "South Korea's Unification Ministry said Wednesday it is certain that the older half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was killed in Malaysia earlier in the week.\nJeong Joon Hee said the ministry is certain that the man, who died after an attack at Kuala Lumpur airport Monday, was Kim Jong Nam, 45, but declined to give further details.\nMeanwhile, South Korea's National Intelligence Service said during a closed briefing to the parliamentary intelligence committee that it was informed about the death three to four hours after the incident occurred, according to Yonhap News Agency."] != ['represent the article to find a fitting news title', "© AFP 2016/ Paul CROCK US Plans to Deploy Strategic Weapons in South Korea for Joint Drills\nMOSCOW (Sputnik) — The South Korean Yonhap news agency reported that the meeting started at 8:50 a.m. local time (23:50 on Tuesday GMT).\nKim Jong Nam, who was the son of former North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, but had not lived in the country for several years, was reportedly killed on Monday in Malaysia. According to US media, Washington officials said that Kim Jong Nam could be assassinated by Pyongyang's security agents.\nThe news came after North Korea launched a missile in the direction of the Sea of Japan early on Sunday, which led to protests from the country’s closest neighbors, Japan and South Korea, both stating that Pyongyang’s actions were in breach of the UN Security Council resolutions."]

Question: Dogs rescued in Pa. were 'debarked' with pipe, authorities say

represent the article to find a fitting news title
For example, '['This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title', 'It\'s the stuff of spy novels. North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un\'s older half-brother Kim Jong Nam died mysteriously at the Kuala Lumpur airport, and both South Korean and Malaysian media report it was likely some sort of poison attack.\nSeveral questions surround his suspicious death, but perhaps the biggest is: Who would want Kim Jong Nam dead?\nThe eldest Kim brother has led a quiet existence outside North Korea for decades, except for making headlines when he tried to enter Japan in 2001 on a fake passport. He later said he was trying to go to Tokyo Disneyland.\nThat Kim has remained out of the limelight is rather remarkable given he\'s the son of Kim Jong Il, North Korea\'s notorious former dictator.\n"You would live anonymously too if people were gunning for you," says Michael Madden, a visiting scholar at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies who runs the site North Korean Leadership Watch.\n"Kim Jong Nam has lived a very leisurely life, primarily in a condo that the Kim family owns in Macau," Madden says. Kim is widely known for his love of gambling and clubs. Madden also says Kim Jong Nam manages the family\'s personal fortune overseas, which includes homes in Singapore, Beijing and Paris.\nKim\'s fate took a turn Monday morning, while he was in transit at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport. Something caused Kim\'s sudden death.\nMalaysian media are showing closed-circuit camera images in which two women cover a traveler\'s face with cloth. Police say emergency responders rushed the man, whose travel documents identified him as "Kim Chol," to the hospital, but he died en route.\n"It probably is the strangest story that I have encountered about North Korean elites and the Kim family and Kim family politics," Madden says.\nIn South Korea Tuesday, Unification Ministry spokesman Jeong Joon-hee confirmed the identity of the dead traveler.\n"The government is certain that the murdered individual is Kim Jong Nam. We have not confirmed the exact cause of death," Jeong said.\nKim could have died of natural causes, given his sedentary lifestyle and the family\'s reported issues with gout and high blood pressure. But if he was killed, theories run the gamut as to why.\nSome believe Kim was punished for skimming from the family fortune he handled, or that he was the scapegoat in a power play by elites wanting to get back into leader Kim Jong Un\'s good graces. But they\'re all just guesses, says Madden.\n"Nobody knows, and I don\'t think we will know the full story about the death of Kim Jong Nam for many years," he says.\nAs with so much about North Korea, even a man\'s demise is dressed in mystery.\nHaeryun Kang contributed to this post from Seoul. Chan Kok Leong contributed to this post from Kuala Lumpur.']' should be close to '['Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it', "N. Korean Leader Kim Jong Un's Half-Brother Is Dead. But Why?"]'

The Pennsylvania SPCA removed 15 dogs from the home of an alleged unlicensed breeder in Lancaster County last week after it received a tip that dogs were being illegally debarked. The group found that three dogs, including Rosella shown here, had been debarked by someone who had pushed a pipe-like object down their throats multiple times. Courtesy of Pennsylvania SPCA

Represent the article to find a fitting news title

CLOSE An Oklahoma woman has died after being mauled by a pack of dachshunds that allegedly belong to a neighbor. Time
Pitt Bull in a rage . (Photo: Beaubizz, Getty Images/iStockphoto)
An 8-month-old baby girl died Wednesday in Miramar, Fla., after she was attacked by a family dog, local police said.
The infant was in the care of her grandmother at the time of the attack, Miramar Police Officer Yessenia Diaz told USA TODAY.
The family owns three pit bulls — a mother, one male sibling and one female sibling. The grandmother was walking the dogs when the male dog, which police said was 3 or 4-years-old, got away from her and attacked the baby who was bobbing in a bouncy chair in one of the bedrooms.
The family raised the male dog who attacked the child from a puppy. Broward County and Animal Care and Adoption officials removed all three dogs. Diaz said the dog that attacked would "most likely" be put down, but it would depend on the result of an evaluation by animal control experts.
Police withheld the identity of the victim and her family because the parents asked for time to inform other relatives, the Sun Sentinel reported.
Police were the first to arrive. When fire and rescue officials got to the scene, they declared the child dead, Diaz said.
Diaz said that a victims services unit was made available to provide counseling and support not only to the child's family but also to the first responders at the scene.
"Who isn't going to be affected by that, especially when they're looking at the crime scene?" Diaz asked.
More: Pack of dogs maul, kill woman in Oklahoma
More: What a difference 4 months makes for boy mauled in pit bull attack
More: Man who tried to help neighbor during dog attack now charged in her death
More: 4-year-old boy killed by family dogs in Texas
More: Louisiana woman dies after pit bull attack at pet boarding facility
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2xvayRG


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it.

Question: After Brexit, UK aims for trade deal with EU that tops Canada pact

represent the article to find a fitting news title.

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain is aiming to secure a comprehensive free trade deal with the European Union and wants it to be signed shortly after it leaves the bloc in 2019, Brexit minister David Davis said on Sunday.
Britain's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union David Davis (L) and European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier wait in a press room at the EC headquarters in Brussels, Belgium December 8, 2017. REUTERS/Yves Herman
After securing an initial agreement on Friday to move Brexit talks to a second phase, Prime Minister Theresa May is keen to start discussing future ties with the EU, and especially the type of trading agreement to try to offer greater certainty for businesses.
But despite Davis striking a confident tone, EU officials say they will only launch negotiations on a legally binding treaty after Britain leaves and becomes a “third country”, according to draft negotiating guidelines.
“It’s not that complicated, it comes right back to the alignment point ... We start in full alignment, we start in complete convergence so we can work it out from there,” Davis told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show.
“The thing is how we manage divergence so it doesn’t undercut the access to the market,” he said, describing his preferred deal as “Canada plus plus plus”.
The EU has been considering a post-Brexit free trade deal with Britain along the lines of one agreed last year with Canada.
But the UK economy is nearly twice the size of Canada’s and British officials have said that their current alignment with EU standards and much closer trading links with the continent give them scope for an even deeper relationship.
LIMITED RESPITE
May has been hailed by many in her deeply divided Conservative party for rescuing the agreement to unlock the Brexit talks by offering EU member Ireland and her allies in Northern Ireland a pledge to avoid any return of a hard border.
By playing with the wording, May agreed that if the two sides failed to agree an overall Brexit deal, the United Kingdom would keep “full alignment” with those rules of the EU’s single market that help cooperation between Ireland’s north and south.
Davis described the commitment as more of a “statement of intent” than a legally binding measure -- something that might reassure hardline Brexit campaigners who fear that it could imply that Britain was leaving the EU in name only.
Despite last week’s progress, May will enjoy little respite. The second phase of talks is expected to expose the rifts in her top team of ministers over what Britain should look like once it leaves the EU.
On Saturday, environment minister Michael Gove, a Brexit campaigner, opened up the possibility of changing the terms of any agreement with the EU after Brexit if Britons felt that the deal had not reflected their demands to “take back control”.
“If the British people dislike the arrangement that we have negotiated with the EU, the agreement will allow a future government to diverge,” Gove wrote in a column in the Daily Telegraph.

This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title

Matthew Elliot told CNBC that a Brexit deal resulting in a Norway style deal will make it difficult for the UK to establish appropriate trade deals outside of the EU. The senior fellow of the Legatum Institute expressed concerns on the direction of travel after a Brexit report published on Friday. He said: “What do we mean by regulatory alignment? Do we mean agreement on overall goals making sure the Isle of Ireland can operate as a unit as a whole, or do we mean a complete mirroring of regulations a bit like you have with the Norway deal, Norway’s position in the EU?"
CNBC•GETTY 'Mirroring Norway won't give us the freedom we need to trade', warns former Leave Campaign Chief
He said: “I think we would be much happier with the former approach where, yes there is some cooperation and making sure things will work out well, but not a mirroring of regulations. “Let’s not forget if we have completely the same regulations as the rest of the EU we won’t be able to get those trade deals with the rest of the world we won’t have our freedom, our regulatory freedom to get those trade deals.” On Monday Labour Brexiteer Gisela Stuart told BBC Westminster Hour that she thinks opting for a Norway style deal would mean the UK has not left the EU.
Ms Stuart said: “If we go down a Norway style or if we go down to a legal meaning of a regulatory alignment then we have not left the European Union. “There will be a whole chunk of the country who will not think best of the politicians if that’s what they’re doing.” The report published on Friday was unclear on whether the UK will remain in or leave the single market.
Brexit deal agreement in full: Read the report published Fri, December 8, 2017 Read the full 7,000-word agreement on the Brexit deal Play slideshow EPA 1 of 17 Here is the 15 page Brexit deal in full


Question: Represent the title to find an explanatory news article

Question: Sousa's budgeting smoke and mirrors

Represent the article to find a fitting news title

Ontario Finance Minister Charles Sousa seems like a pleasant person, but he reminds us of a used car salesman whenever he's selling his upcoming budget.
One who doesn't want you looking under the hood too closely while he's making his sales pitch.
On Thursday, Sousa boasted to The Empire Club in Toronto that his fifth budget on April 27 will demonstrate that, "Ontario is the leanest government with the lowest per-capita spending of any province."
Um, that's been true for Ontario governments going back decades.
Since Ontario has the largest population of any province, it also has the advantage of economies of scale when delivering public services.
The Bill Davis Progressive Conservative government, for example, made exactly the same boast in 1981-82 that Sousa made Thursday.
When the Liberals are in power, they always boast about delivering services at the lowest per-capita cost of any province.
When they're out of power, they always blame the party in power for not spending enough on government services. (In fairness, all parties do it.)
What Sousa didn't say is that the Liberals have more than doubled Ontario's debt to more than $300 billion since coming to power in 2003, which has made Ontario the most indebted sub-sovereign (non-national) borrower in the world.
He didn't say the auditor general and Ontario's Financial Accountability Office have warned the Liberals that they have plunged the province into precarious levels of debt.
Sousa claimed the Liberal scheme to borrow even more money from Ontario taxpayers to subsidize the electricity bills of hydro ratepayers -- even though they're the same people -- is "fairer because it doesn't ask today's generation alone to pay the entire freight."
That argument turns generations of fiscally prudent thinking -- that you don't stick future generations with huge bills to pay for today's services -- on its head.
Finally, Sousa repeated, for the umpteenth time, that this year's budget will be balanced, later adding along with "next year and the year after that."
Two problems. First, Sousa's promising to balance a budget that won't come down until after the next Ontario election in 2018.
Second, in 2003, then Liberal leader Dalton McGuinty promised before the election not to raise our taxes.
And we all remember what happened after he won.

Georgia special
The special election in Georgia to fill HHS Secretary Tom Price’s old congressional seat could end with a historic Democratic upset. The Sixth District seat has been held by a Republican continuously since Newt Gingrich won it in 1978, but changing demographics and what’s known as a “jungle primary” are giving Democrat Jon Ossoff a shot at winning today’s vote.
Georgia tea leaves
Spanning wealthier and Republican-leaning suburbs north of Atlanta, Tom Price’s old seat is just the kind of place Democrats would love to pull off an upset. They’d point to it as evidence of excitement in their base, and support from the upper-income Republicans and college graduates who eluded them in 2016. But winning will be tough. We look at data from the 50,000 early votes already cast to gauge the contest.
Custody battle
A lawyer for conservative radio show host Alex Jones says his client is nothing more than a showman. He said it in a Texas court, where Jones is fighting for custody of his children. His ex-wife argues the views and conspiracy theories on Jones’ radio show prove he’s unfit for fatherhood.
Silver lining
Whatever your feelings about tax day, retailers want you to know they feel your pain (or relief). The tax day freebie has become something of a modern tradition as corporations angle for new customers. Here’s a sampling of the companies trying to take some sting out of today by offering big discounts and free stuff.
Church cops
Alabama lawmakers could send a bill to the governor this week that would allow a megachurch to establish its own police force. The bill has already passed the state Senate and is awaiting a House vote. We take a look at why the plan is getting mixed reactions.
Corn sole
Reebok is creating its first shoe made entirely from biological materials. The shoe, available this fall, will have a cotton upper and a sole made from Susterra, a corn-based plastic substitute. It’s intended to be completely compostable, and will even use biologically derived glue to join the pieces together.
More top news:
U.S.
Supreme Court turns back Arkansas bid for execution spree
Young woman falls to death from balcony near college campus
Man accused of stealing more than 100 phones at Coachella
World
Trump congratulates Turkish leader on vote as observers cry foul
Dozens killed as bus plunges into mountain ravine
New details on North Korea’s failed missile test
Politics
North Korea forces Trump off his campaign provinces
Ivanka Trump’s company flourishing as she starts White House job
Democrats nationwide eye Georgia special election
Ethics experts say Trump admin. is least transparent in decades
Business
This could be the year of falling rents
How boomers are adjusting to prospects of frugal retirement
Health
How to pick the right allergy medicine for kids
7th-grader tests cancer fighting chemicals in green tea
Science and tech
Saturn’s moon Titan may have “electric sand”
Millions of likes lost in Facebook’s user purge
Entertainment
Harvey Weinstein on his plans to fight Trump


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it

Question: Appeals court refuses to toss Aaron Schock charges

represent the article to find a fitting news title

CHICAGO (AP) - An appeals court has refused to toss corruption charges against former U.S. Rep. Aaron Schock, saying it can't assess whether his prosecution violated constitutional separation-of-powers clauses until after he goes to trial.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago says in its unanimous ruling Wednesday that it doesn't believe appellate courts have the authority to address such questions until after a verdict. No date has been set for the 36-year-old Schock's trial on 22 corruption counts.
The Republican from the central Illinois city of Peoria was indicted in 2016 on charges of misusing funds. He resigned in 2015 amid scrutiny of his spending, including to redecorate his Capitol Hill office in the style of the TV show "Downton Abbey."
A Schock spokesman didn't have an immediate comment.

this news article should be represented to find a fitting news title.

1:25 O'Fallon girls swim coach talks about proposed budget cuts at the school Pause
0:25 Dealey Plaza, changed and unchanged since 1963
3:43 Coroner, state police trooper talk about importance of diversity at Wolf Branch
2:02 Repo man felt bad taking elderly couple's car. Here's how he made it up to them.
52:50 Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner sits down with the BND Editorial Board
2:02 High noon coming over Illinois employee pay, Gov. Rauner says
2:02 Police release video of fatal shooting of unarmed Oklahoma man
2:59 Parents charged with multiple felonies in infant son's death
2:40 Texas woman convicted of voter fraud says she voted Republican


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it

Question: Taylor Swift Wins Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Former Radio Host

this news article should be represented to find a fitting news title.

A Denver jury found fully in pop singer Taylor Swift's favor Monday, delivering a unanimous verdict in a trial over whether she was groped by a former radio host during a Denver meet-and-greet. Wanting the trial to serve as an "example to other women," the star had sought a single dollar in damages, which she was granted.
In his closing statements, Swift's lawyer Douglas Baldridge referenced the example that Swift hoped her suit could be for others in similar situations "by returning a verdict on Ms. Swift's counterclaim for a single dollar — a single symbolic dollar, the value of which is immeasurable to all women in this situation."
In his own closing arguments, David Mueller's attorney Gabriel McFarland wondered why his client would introduce himself by name and then almost immediately after, reach under the skirt of "one of the planet's, one of the country's, biggest superstars?"
The case was largely fought on the credibility of Swift and Mueller.
Late this past Friday, a federal judge threw out part of the case brought against Swift by Mueller, saying he had not proved Swift had set out to get him fired.
Swift countersued Mueller for sexual assault after his own suit was filed in 2015, leading to the Denver trial, which began jury selection last Monday. Swift initially had sought to keep the incident quiet.
By Friday, most of the principals in the case had been heard from — most notably Swift herself, who had several sharp rejoinders to questions from Mueller's attorney. Asked about Mueller's firing, Swift responded: "I am not going to allow your client to make me feel like it is any way my fault, because it isn't."

Represent this text to find a news title for it

This is fantastic !!! Everyone wanted to be a Toys R’ Us kid right?
RELATED CONTENT
The U.S. Released Its First Ever Pink Coin, and Raised $4 Million for Breast Cancer Research in One Day
Little Caesars Offered Free Pizza For Everyone If a 16-Seed Beat a 1-Seed in March Madness . . . and It Actually Happened
Two Guys Try to Use Spaghetti Sauce to Start a Fire After a Burglary
The Virgin “Idol” Contestant Did Not Want Katy Perry to Be His First Kiss
A Guy Followed His Mom’s Lottery Advice and Won $100,000
Wednesday Edition of Things that make you go hmmmmmm


Question: Represent the title to find an explanatory news article.

Question: The Case for a Reaganesque approach to Big Pharma

This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title

With healthcare reform winding its way slowly through the Senate, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell vowing to get it to passage, expect some very tired talking points to get trotted out. Liberals will complain that the GOP's version of healthcare reform should not leave the poor vulnerable to a disproportionately expensive system, and conservatives will reply that America should return to having the best healthcare system in the world unhampered by socialized medicine.
Start the conversation, or Read more at The American Conservative.

We continue our weeklong immigration series by talking about what a fair and humane immigration policy would look like.
By the end of 2015, a record 65.3 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide. An estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States. Last year, nearly 85,000 refugees were resettled in the country. Immigrants and communities are struggling with fear over the consequences of being detained, jailed, and deported. What would a humane immigration system look like?
Guests:
Bill Ong Hing, professor of law at the University of San Francisco and professor of law emeritus, UC Davis, and author of Ethical Borders—NAFTA, Globalization and Mexican Migration and Deporting Our Souls—Values, Morality, and Immigration Policy
Catherine Tactaquin, executive director and a co-founder of the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights
Web Resources:
Unitarian Universalist Association: Principles of humane immigration reform
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative: Statement on Immigration & Refugee Executive Order
National Immigration Law Center
American Friends Service Committee: Immigrant rights
The Atlantic: Fleeing by the Millions: Migration Crises Around the World
The Washington Post: RAISING BARRIERS
Time: See Every Executive Order Donald Trump Has Signed Since Becoming President


Question: I found this news title. Can you represent it to find an explanatory news article?

Question: Italian authorities apprehend ‘gunman’ targeting foreigners

Officials in a central Italian city have confirmed that a suspect in drive-by shootings against foreigners has been apprehended.
The city of Macerata’s Twitter account says the gunman has been captured about two hours after he began a shooting rampage from a black automobile. Macerata was the scene of a gruesome killing earlier this week of a white Italian woman. The chief suspect in that killing is a Nigerian.
Authorities had warned citizens to stay inside Saturday while the shooter remained at large. The number of victims hasn’t been confirmed.

GETTY Trio charged on suspicon of plotting terror attack
Thomas Sauret, 20, and his 16-year-old girlfriend known only as Sarah – who both pledged allegiance to ISIS – were arrested with Malik Hammami, 33, in the southern coastal city of Montpellier. Anti-terror investigators are handling the case after all three have been charged for “criminal association in connection with a criminal terrorist enterprise”, it has been claimed. Sauret and Sarah have also been charged with making and possessing explosives in an organised group.
Sarah was allegedly seen pledging allegiance to the death-cult ISIS in a video on social media and claimed the Eiffel Tower would have been her main target in interviews. She and her boyfriend were driven from the headquarters of France's domestic intelligence services to a specially convened terrorist court in central Paris. All three of the accused are said to have been spotted using the encrypted messaging app Telegram – a well-known method of communication among would-be jihadis.
Europe in Crisis Sun, February 5, 2017 Terrorism, migrants, and crippling debt: is this the end of Europe? Play slideshow 1 of 11
GETTY Eiffel Tower was allegedly the main target for the accussed
An imminent terrorist act was being prepared Interior minister Bruno Le Roux
Interior minister Bruno Le Roux said: "An imminent terrorist act was being prepared.” The teenage girl and Sauret, who both converted to Islam, are accused of buying acetone and hydrogen peroxide – chemicals which are widely known for making a homemade explosive known as TATP. Police found 71 grams of TATP during a raid in the cellar of a house in Clapiers, a small commune just north of Montpellier, where Sauret had been allegedly staying. Sarah lived with her divorced mother of Greek origin, sources close to the case have said.
GETTY Paris has been on high-alert since a terror attack in November 2015


Question: Represent the title to find an explanatory news article

Question: Poland Spring throws cold water on class-action lawsuit

We can’t judge our lives by what other people do with their money: Vaz-Oxlade
Don't measure your financial wealth by how your friends and neighbours spend their money.

Represent the article to find a fitting news title.


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it

Question: Atlanta: News, Weather and Traffic

Q – I got new carpet last spring. It shows a little dirt but I have always been told to hold off cleaning because cleaning will actually make it get dirt again faster.
But now it is nearing the Holidays and I want it cleaned. Is it too early to have done?
Wanda in Watkinsville
A – Too early for what? For the Holidays?
It is not too early to have your carpet cleaned, depending on how you have it done. Let me tell you why it depends on who you use.
When a carpet cleaning company uses soap and water to clean your carpets, it is almost impossible to rinse all the soap out of the carpet. The job of soap is to collect dirt. That is what soap does for a living.
When you use soap and water to clean your carpet and you don’t get all the soap rinsed out, the remaining soap acts like, well, soap. It will still sit there collecting dirt because it doesn’t know that it is supposed to stop.
It’s soap.
That is why carpets cleaned with soap with get dirty faster. The left over soap is still collecting dirt.
That is where the wives tale was always to wait as long as possible before cleaning new carpets.
That said, not every good carpet cleaner uses soap. I know of one company that uses a special, proprietary water product that works very, very well without soap.
If you go in that direction, then no, it is not too soon to get your carpet cleaned.
BTW – you may want to get on somebodies cleaning schedule soon. With the Holidays looming the actual time you have to have a carpet cleaning company come out to do the work is shrinking every day.
Hop to it…
More from Dave Baker >>

this news article should be represented to find a fitting news title

TV is part of CBS Television Stations, a division of CBS Corp. and one of the largest network-owned station groups in the country. Click here for WCCO-TV news stories Send us your breaking news tips here Contact WCCO-TV anchors and reporters Check out Good Question Send us your weather and news photos Get information on [...] 830 WCCO Welcome to News Radio 830 WCCO on CBSMinnesota.com! WCCO is part of CBS Radio, a division of CBS Corp. and one of the largest network-owned station groups in the country.
Start the conversation, or Read more at CBS Local.


Question: I found this news title. Can you represent it to find an explanatory news article?

Question: Kejriwal vs LG: SC verdict a blow to ‘anarchist’ Kejriwal, says BJP

Represent this text to find a news title for it

New Delhi, July 4: The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday termed the Supreme Court's verdict on the Delhi government's tussle with the Centre over the administrative control as a severe blow to "anarchist" Kejriwal.
BJP's spokesperson Sambit Patra accused Kejriwal of being a "self-declared anarchist" who thinks "he is the Constitution". The summary of the judgement, Patra said, was that "the Constitution is sacrosanct, constitutional morality is extremely important, and anarchy has no place in the Indian democratic set-up".
"The Supreme Court has very clearly said the departments of land, police and law and order are with the L-G. There is no debate on this and Parliament can make laws for Delhi," Patra said, adding that there is a need for all to work without anarchy.
Patra accused Kejriwal of being a "self-declared anarchist" who thinks "he is the Constitution". The summary of the judgement, Patra said, was that "the Constitution is sacrosanct, constitutional morality is extremely important, and anarchy has no place in the Indian democratic set-up".
The Supreme Court today held that elected representatives and the Council of Ministers in Delhi, who are accountable to the voters, must have "appropriate powers" to perform their functions "effectively and efficiently".
A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said that the exercise of establishing a democratic form of government in Delhi would "turn futile" if the elected government was not able to usher in policies and laws on which the Assembly has the power to legislate.
"The elected representatives and the council of ministers of Delhi, being accountable to the voters of Delhi, must have the appropriate powers so as to perform their functions effectively and efficiently," the bench categorically stated.
Regarding the powers of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi, the top court referred to Article 239 AA(4) of the Constitution and said he was bound by the aid and advice of the council of ministers in matters for which the Assembly has the legislative powers.
For breaking news & Instant updates throughout the day

It is clear now that Delhi Chief Minister has given up his brand of combative (AAP) supremo Kejriwal launched into an apology spree and apologised to Congress leader Kapil Sibal's son Amit Sibal and Union minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader for making unverified allegations of corruption against them. The development came days after Kejriwal apologised to former Punjab minister Bikram Singh Majithia. After he tendered his apology, Kejriwal was acquitted in two separate defamation cases lodged against him by Amit Sibal, a senior advocate and son of former Union minister Kapil Sibal, and Gadkari. Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, a co-accused with Kejriwal in the lodged by Sibal, was also acquitted after he, too, tendered an apology to the lawyer. Kejriwal intends to bring an end to the 33 defamation cases against him by means of similar out-of-court settlements and individual "understandings", say sources. According to AAP leaders, the various cases have drained the party's resources and money. The Congress and the BJP, however, hauled Kejriwal over the coals. The Opposition party advised that the Delhi chief minister should change his name to Arvind 'Sorry' Kejriwal, while the ruling party at the Centre lashed out at the AAP chief's brand of The AAP chief has been dragged to courts in multiple defamation cases lodged by various political leaders, including Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and former Delhi chief minister Kejriwal still has to contend with Jaitley's case, and sources in the AAP had told news agencies last week that the senior BJP leader could also soon receive an apology from the Delhi chief minister. Last week, Kejriwal wrote to Akali Dal leader Bikram Majithia, apologising for accusing him of being involved in drug trade without any proof to back the allegations. The apology, however, did not go down to well with everyone and triggered what amounted to a virtual rebellion in the AAP Punjab unit. Subsequently, Bhagwant Mann resigned as AAP's Punjab unit chief. However, things seem to have improved since Kejriwal's meeting with AAP members of the Punjab legislative Assembly, with most saying they understand the decision of the party's convenor. Amit Sibal had filed a defamation suit against Kejriwal and Sisodia for alleging that Kapil Sibal had a conflict in seeking to revise a tax demand on telecom major Vodafone. In 2014, Gadkari had filed a defamation suit against Kejriwal after the AAP chief named him in a list of "corrupt politicians". In the filed by Gadkari, it was alleged that Kejriwal had called him "India's most corrupt". Here are the top 10 developments in Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's apology spree that has so far covered Majithia, Sibal and Gadkari: 1) BJP says 'anarchic character' of Kejriwal's exposed: BJP's Delhi unit chief Manoj Tiwari took a dig at Kejriwal and his apologies, stating that the "anarchic character" of the "NGO politics" practised by the Delhi chief minister now stood exposed before the people of the country. Tiwari also alleged that Kejriwal was a regular violator of the law and that he had, in connivance with a section of the media preferring to run anti-establishment news, "misused" the Right to Information Act against his political opponents. 2) Shivraj Singh Chouhan has a piece of advice for the AAP chief: Kejriwal, who has received much ridicule over his apologies, given his past brand of politics, also received some advice on how to go about his apology spree. The Delhi chief minister's Madhya Pradesh counterpart, Shivraj Singh Chouhan, tweeted a piece of advice: "Arvind-ji, if you heed my suggestion then make a list of people that you need to apologise to and prepare an apology letter headed 'To whomsoever it may concern'. "This would save you the hassle of apologising repeatedly," Chouhan's tweet said. ALSO READ: Kejriwal's 'sorry' syndrome: Shivraj Singh Chouhan's advice to Delhi CM 3) Congress says AAP chief should change his name: The Congress on Monday advised the Delhi Chief Minister to change his name to Arvind 'Sorry' Kejriwal, adding that this is what happened when "one does for sensationalism". Congress spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjwala said, "There is a sorry Chief Minister in the country. He should change his name to Arvind Sorry Kejriwal. This is just the beginning of his trail of saying sorry, and not the end." "He also has to apologise to the people of Delhi and the country, whom he has deceived," added Surjwala. "He also has to apologise for poor governance. When you do only for sensationalism, and not for balance, then this going to be the consequence," said the Congress leaders, adding, "The propaganda which was spread by him and his associates in collusion with BJP-RSS at Ram Leela Maidan during UPA rule, the truth of it has come out." "Delhi is sorry to have Kejriwal and his government," he added. 4) Sisodia says don't want to waste time on defamation cases: Defending his party chief's apologies to Majithia, Gadkari, and Sibal, Delhi Deputy Chief Minister said on Monday that he would use his time in service of the people instead of doing rounds of the courts for defamation cases filed against him and Kejriwal. "We will apologise to the people we have hurt. We're here to serve the people; we do not have the time to go to courts for such issues," said Sisodia, adding, "We're here to build schools and hospitals for the welfare of people."
ALSO READ: Kejriwal says sorry to Gadkari, Sibal, Majithia; Arun Jaitley next? updates Sources have told news agencies that Kejriwal intends to bring an end to all the defamation cases against him, which reportedly number 33, by means of similar out of court settlements and individual "understandings". According to AAP leaders, the various cases have drained the party's resources and money.
5) says Kejriwal backing off 'meekly': Displeased by his string of apologies, Displeased by his string of apologies, former AAP leader attacked Arvind Kejriwal , asking the AAP chief why he had published a list of 20 "corrupt politicians" if he wanted to "back off meekly". Further, Damania rejected Kejriwal's contention that he wanted to focus his strength in Delhi.
"Ideally, with a strong MLA force of 67 out of 70 MLAs, he should have entrusted the functioning of the Delhi government to his trusted MLAs and fought each one of the cases and ensured victory in every single matter and punish(ed) these corrupt politicians," she said. "It is extremely upsetting to see Arvind seeking apology from Gadkari despite concrete evidences given by me. Why on the earth had the AAP issued a list of 20 most corrupt politicians if they were to back off meekly?" added Damania.
Damania was once a key associate of Kejriwal. She had accused Gadkari of irregularities in his Purti Group of companies. Kejriwal, for his part, had gone on to name Gadkari as one of the most corrupt politicians in India. Taking objection to this, Gadkari had moved the court against Kejriwal for allegedly defaming him.
Besides spear-heading the campaign against Gadkari, Damania had also contested against him from Nagpur in the Lok Sabha polls 2014.
ALSO READ: Kejriwal apologises to Majithia; AAP, SAD-BJP leaders upset; 10 highlights Damania added that she still has 24 defamation cases against her and that she would fight them out until the end. Damania had quit AAP in 2015 at a time when the party was witnessing an ugly spat between and Yogendra Yadav on one side and Kejriwal on the other.
6) acquitted in Gadkari and Sibal defamation cases: Despite the criticism, Despite the criticism, AAP's apology strategy does seem to be paying off , at least as far as dealing with the defamation cases is concerned, concerns over how it will impact the party's political image notwithstanding. Kejriwal was on Monday acquitted in the two separate defamation cases lodged against him by Gadkari and Amit Sibal after he issued an apology to both of them.
After also tendered an apology to Amit Sibal through a letter, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal acquitted the deputy Delhi chief minister, who was a co-accused along with Kejriwal in the lodged by Sibal.
The relief came from the court after the apologies were accepted by the complainants in both the cases.
ALSO READ: Punjab AAP unit to support Kejriwal, other politicians miffed: 10 updates However, the proceedings against lawyer and BJP leader Shazia Ilmi will continue in the lodged by Amit Sibal.
7) Kejriwal opposes second Rs 100-million defamation suit by Jaitley in HC: In the Delhi High Court, In the Delhi High Court, Kejriwal on Monday opposed the second Rs 100 million (Rs 10 crore) defamation suit against him by Arun Jaitley over the use of an objectionable word by the chief minister's former lawyer The AAP chief claimed that he had never instructed his then counsel, Jethmalani, to use any scandalous words against Jaitley during recording of his evidence.
Jaitley had filed the second defamation suit after Jethmalani allegedly "abused" him in the open court during the proceedings of the original defamation suit he had filed against the AAP chief and five other party functionaries.
However, the chief minister maintained that apart from the ground of "absolute privilege, the present suit is also barred by Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act".
"The statement, upon which the suit is based on alleged defamatory imputations made by the senior advocate (without any oath), allegedly on the instructions of the defendant (Kejriwal), which he could not have disclosed," Kejriwal said in his written statement filed through advocate Anupam Srivastava.
Section 126 of the Evidence Act bars disclosure of any professional communication between an advocate and his client, including instructions given by the client in relation to his case.
During the cross-examination of the minister on May 17 last year before Joint Registrar in the Delhi High Court, Jethmalani had used a term Jaitley found objectionable.
ALSO READ: Kejriwal's string of apologies continues, latest to Gadkari, Amit Sibal The second suit filed through advocate Manik Dogra has said that the minister enjoyed a reputation of honesty and probity and had sacrificed large professional earnings in order to undertake public service.
8) Kejriwal apologises to Gadkari, Sibal: Days after Kejriwal regretted having accused Akali Dal leader Bikram Majithia of being involved in the drug trade, Days after Kejriwal regretted having accused Akali Dal leader Bikram Majithia of being involved in the drug trade, Kejriwal apologised to BJP leader and Union Minister and Congress leader Kapil Sibal for making unverified allegations of corruption against them. Both leaders withdrew their defamation cases against the AAP chief on Monday.
In a March 16 letter to Gadkari, Kejriwal said he was feeling sorry for making "certain statements, without regard to its verifiability, which seem to have hurt you...".
"I have nothing personal against you. I regret the same. Let us put the incident behind us and bring the court proceedings to a closure," said the letter.
Addressing the Union Shipping and Transport Minister, Kejriwal also suggested that "we should put our energy to serve the people of this country in the spirit of mutual respect".
जनता को समझना चाहिए कि आखिर क्यों केजरीवाल झूठे आरोप लगाते हैं ..@ArvindKejriwal is regular and habitual offender and this is his "माफीनामा" modus operandi देश ने इतनी ओछी राजनीति अब तक नही देखी pic.twitter.com/30hIUdZRQL — Manoj Tiwari (@ManojTiwariMP) March 19, 2018 Later, Gadkari and Kejriwal filed a joint application in the Patiala House Court, seeking the withdrawal of the "Kejriwal has acknowledged that (the) complainant (Gadkari) was hurt on account of unverified allegations and expressed regret, in the larger public interest" and that "the complainant does not wish to pursue the defamation case", read the application. The court allowed the plea and disposed of the case.
Joint application by lawyers of @nitin_gadkari & @ArvindKejriwal for withdrawal of criminal defamation case in Patiala House Court : pic.twitter.com/PVP2e5HJ4o — Nagendar Sharma (@sharmanagendar) March 19, 2018 Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister also wrote to Congress leader Kapil Sibal and his son Amit, seeking apology for making "unfounded" allegation against them at a joint press conference on May 15, 2013. "Now, I have learnt that the allegation I made against you and your father at the press conference were unfounded. I hereby withdraw all my allegations made against you and your father and apologise for the same," the AAP leaders said. Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister also wrote to Congress leader Kapil Sibal and his son Amit, seeking apology for making "unfounded" allegation against them at a joint press conference on May 15, 2013. "Now, I have learnt that the allegation I made against you and your father at the press conference were unfounded. I hereby withdraw all my allegations made against you and your father and apologise for the same," the AAP leaders said.
"The damage caused to your esteem, the hurt cause to your family, friends and well-wishers and the loss caused to you is regretted," Kejriwal and Sisodia wrote in separate but identical letters.
ALSO READ: Sibal forgives Kejriwal The four -- Kejriwal, Sisodia and the Sibals -- then jointly wrote to the court seeking withdrawal of the by the Sibals. The court disposed of the case filed by Amit Sibal after Kejriwal alleged conflict of interest over his appearing in the Supreme Court for Telecom major Vodafone when his father was the union Communication Minister.
9) Kejriwal tries to pacify dissenting Punjab AAP MLAs: On the backfoot after tendering an apology to Bikram Singh Majithia, the AAP on Sunday sought to On the backfoot after tendering an apology to Bikram Singh Majithia, the AAP on Sunday sought to pacify its party MLAs from Punjab in a bid to avert a split in the state unit. Kejriwal's apology letter to Majithia for accusing him of being involved in the drug trade took everyone by surprise, especially the AAP's Punjab unit.
The party's Punjab president Bhagwant Mann and its co-president Aman Arora resigned from their posts in protest against Kejriwal's apology.
Of the 20 AAP MLAs from Punjab, 10 lawmakers along with state unit leaders met Delhi Deputy Chief Minister at his residence in New Delhi on Sunday, where Chief Minister was also present.
ALSO READ: Majithia apology: Kumar Vishwas takes a poetic dig at Arvind Kejriwal The chief minister is said to have given an explanation for his apology to Majithia.
10) Anna Hazare taunts Kejriwal: Following Kejriwal's apology to Majithia, social activist Following Kejriwal's apology to Majithia, social activist Anna Hazare last week taunted the AAP chief , saying that one should not do anything for which one has to tender an apology later. "Why should one do anything for which one has to tender an apology later on," Anna Hazare told the media.


Question: I found this news title. Can you represent it to find an explanatory news article?!

Question: Atlanta Hawks player charged with drunken driving in Oregon

This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title.

ATLANTA (AP)  A basketball player who just finished his rookie season with the Atlanta Hawks has been arrested on a drunken driving charge in Oregon.
Eugene police spokeswoman Melinda McLaughlin tells news outlets an officer pulled over 22-year-old Tyler Dorsey for driving without lights early Saturday. The officer spotted an open container of alcohol on the floor of the passenger's side.
He was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants, driving without lights and having an open alcoholic beverage container and was released after posting $590 bail. It's unclear whether he has a lawyer.
Dorsey was drafted by the Hawks last April, following his sophomore year at the University of Oregon.
Advertisement
The Hawks said in a statement that they're still gathering information and won't comment further at this time.

Richie's former pal was sentenced to 45 days in jail after a judge ruled that she violated of the terms of her probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case.


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it

Question: RPT-ANALYSIS-French Socialists fight for life against betrayal and division

(Repeats story moved on Tuesday without change to text)
* Hollande first postwar president not to seek re-election
* His Socialists in disarray as candidate 5th in polls
* Defections to centrist Macron may presage party split
By John Irish
PARIS, March 28 Francois Hollande's election as president in 2012 was supposed to herald a new dawn for French socialism after 17 years of right-wing rule, but by June his party could be struggling to survive.
Weeks before the start of an election to pick France's next president, the ruling bloc is in tatters. Socialist Party (PS) nominee Benoit Hamon is floundering after adopting a hard-left programme that alienated more moderate colleagues.
Polls put Hamon in a humiliating fifth place, behind the independent leftist Jean-Luc Melenchon whose charisma and similarly radical programme have overshadowed Hamon's message.
Party grandees, meanwhile, are jumping ship to back independent centrist Emmanuel Macron, Hollande's former economy minister who is now favourite to win the presidency.
Macron is more palatable to party moderates who see Hamon's policies as outdated and resent his refusal to defend the president's legacy.
"The future is very uncertain. The Socialist party must negotiate its transformation for its survival," said Adelaide Zulfikarpasic of pollster BVA.
The potential implosion of the Socialist party weakens France's two-party system that has been in place for 30 years and has prevented the far right from increasing its power in presidential and legislative elections.
Like in Britain, it also risks leaving the main left-wing party in opposition for years as it takes a radical turn, reinforcing an anti-European side on the left.
If Macron were to fail, it would be unclear what would happen to the centre-left at a time when France's traditional centre-right is increasingly radicalised and could also be in disarray should its candidate, Francois Fillon, also fail to reach the May 7 run-off.
In 2002, outgoing Socialist prime minister Lionel Jospin was beaten to the presidential runoff by then far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen. The party potentially faces an even bloodier defeat this time.
Their disarray reflects the wider struggle of Europe's left where leaders in Italy and Germany have fallen on their swords and the British Labour Party is riven by infighting.
Some French Socialist lawmakers say in private that their aim now is to limit the damage in the presidential vote so as to build a foundation for the legislative elections in June.
A vote above 10 percent for Hamon could help save seats, creating a platform for a say in a Macron parliamentary majority, but some kind of party split looks likely.
"I think that after the elections, the Socialists will implode into the 'reformed Socialists' who could be part of a governing majority and the 'status quo Socialists'," a minister in the current government told Reuters.
This split has its roots in Hollande's five years in power, when he moved away from pro-worker election pledges to launch business-friendly reforms. Their failure to spur the economy emboldened rebels such as Hamon and further alienated voters.
Stinging defeats in local elections followed, and party membership has almost halved since 2012.
As a result, and despite having a majority in both parliamentary houses, Hollande became the first postwar French president not to seek re-election.
STABBED IN THE BACK
"I respect Benoit Hamon's logic, which has always existed on the Left - a utopian project - but it's clear that implementing such a project does not correspond to reality and a capacity to act," said Defence Minister Jean Yves-Le Drian, a Socialist party heavyweight, who last week backed Macron.
Some 50 other Socialist lawmakers have turned to Macron's newly-formed En Marche! (Onwards!) movement, defections that Hamon calls a "betrayal".
Meanwhile, former prime minister Manuel Valls, who lost to Hamon in the primaries and is seen as waiting in the wings to pick up the pieces after the presidential race, has been scathing about the former education minister. Hamon signed a motion of no-confidence against Valls' government last year.
"Those who join Emmanuel Macron, and are stabbing me in the back, are not those who gave me life ... Those are the 2 million voters," Hamon told France 2 television on Sunday, referring to the turnout for the January Socialist primaries.
"Anyway I would never have governed with them."
Macron's momentum ahead of the April-May vote will be key for how the Socialists shape up in the coming years. His movement says it bridges France's left-right divide, and although the race remains tight and voters unsure, polls show that Macron should easily beat National Front leader Marine Le Pen - daughter of Jean-Marie - in the run-off.
"If this central scenario materialises, there will be less reason for parties to stick together," said Eurasia analyst Charles Lichfield.
"This is especially likely on the left, as the PS is likely to do very badly. Expressing some proximity to Macron may be a way for 100-150 PS members of parliament to save their seats."
Even uniting the left into opposition will be hard, given that Melenchon offers a clean break from the tarnished Socialists.
The one-time Trotskyist and former teacher who quit the party in 2008 has sucked away the hard left vote with calls to fight the rich and powerful, asking PS supporters: "In these conditions, without a project or electoral advantage, what is the point of a Socialist candidate?"
(Additional reporting by Marine Pennetier and Emile Picy; Editing by Andrew Callus and Robin Pomeroy)

represent the article to find a fitting news title

Emmanuel Macron, head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, speaks with a youth during a campaign visit in Sarcelles, near Paris, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Martin Bureau/Pool
Emmanuel Macron (C), head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, speaks with youths during a campaign visit in Sarcelles, near Paris, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Martin Bureau/Pool
Youths walk behind a banner which reads, 'Neither Macron, Nor Le Pen - The Uprising is Now' at a demonstration to protest the results of the first round of the presidential election in Nantes, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Stephane Mahe
Supporters for Marine Le Pen, French National Front (FN) political party leader and candidate for French 2017 presidential election, attend a campaign rally in Nice, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Eric Gaillard
Marine Le Pen (C), French National Front (FN) political party candidate for French 2017 presidential election, talks to the media after an excursion on a fishing boat during a campaign visit to the port in Le Grau-du-Roi, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Jean-Paul Pelissier
Emmanuel Macron, head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, attends a campaign rally in Arras, France, April 26, 2017. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier
A supporter for Marine Le Pen, French National Front (FN) political party leader and candidate for French 2017 presidential election, attends a campaign rally in Nice, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Eric Gaillard
Supporters for Marine Le Pen, French National Front (FN) political party leader and candidate for French 2017 presidential election, attend a campaign rally in Nice, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Jean-Pierre Amet
Emmanuel Macron, head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, poses before taking part in the show 'Elysee 2017' on French television channel TF1 in Paris, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Eric Feferberg/Pool
Emmanuel Macron, head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, poses before taking part in the show 'Elysee 2017' on French television channel TF1 in Paris, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Eric Feferberg/Pool
Emmanuel Macron (C), head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, shakes hands with a youth during a campaign visit in Sarcelles, near Paris, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Martin Bureau/Pool
Emmanuel Macron (C), head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, holds a girl during a campaign visit in Sarcelles, near Paris, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Martin Bureau
Marine Le Pen (2ndL), French National Front (FN) political party candidate for French 2017 presidential election, waves from a fishing boat after an excursion during a campaign visit to the port in Le Grau-du-Roi, France, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Jean-Paul Pelissier
Emmanuel Macron (C), head of the political movement En Marche !, or Onwards !, and candidate for the 2017 presidential election, kicks a soccer ball during a campaign visit in Sarcelles, near Paris, April 27, 2017. REUTERS/Martin Bureau/Pool
PARIS/LE GRAU DU ROI, France France's presidential candidates battled for the popular vote on Thursday with far-right Marine Le Pen wooing fishermen and Emmanuel Macron playing soccer as polls showed the centrist's commanding lead narrow marginally.
As runner-up in last Sunday's opening ballot, Le Pen remained the underdog, but several polls suggested she had made a more impressive start to the last lap of campaigning than Macron.
A daily Opinionway poll saw Macron's predicted score dipping to 59 percent for the first time since mid-March.
A Harris survey showed Macron garnering 61 percent of voting intentions, but suggested momentum was on Le Pen's side as the centrist's lead narrowed by several percentage points.
Dressed in fishermen's yellow oilskins, Le Pen, 48, grappled with a freshly caught octopus on a fishing boat out at sea first thing on Thursday. She told reporters on the quayside she would defend seafarers and all endangered sectors against invasive EU regulations.
"Let me warn you, that man (Macron) will destroy our entire social and economic structure," she told a horde of journalists at Le Grau du Roi, a port west of Marseille.
Macron, a 39-year-old who did a stint as economy minister in the outgoing Socialist government before breaking away to launch his own political movement, mocked her photo opportunity.
"Madame Le Pen has gone fishing. Enjoy the outing. The exit from Europe that she is proposing will spell the end of French fisheries," he tweeted.
Macron took his campaign to Sarcelles, a poor Parisian suburb with a large community of North African and sub-Saharan African descent where more than one in three young people are out of work, double the national average.
In stark contrast to Wednesday, when he was heckled by factory workers in northern France, the ex-banker was greeted to cheers and kicked a football around with youngsters.
He hit back at Le Pen's attempts to portray herself as the woman of the people, accusing the trained lawyer, who was born and raised in a wealthy Paris suburb, of hypocrisy, making false promises and continuing the "xenophobic" policies of her father Jean-Marie Le Pen.
"She is lying to you," Macron said in the town, where the majority voted for the far-left in last week's first round.
"France is not the vicious and repressive face that Mrs Le Pen carries. I will not let her trivialise what the National Front is, which is a xenophobic party."
HAPPY EUROPE
Both contenders redoubled their attempts to paint the other as the candidate of the political establishment on Thursday and appealed for support from across the political spectrum after an election race that has alienated some voters.
As the final vote on May 7 approaches, the candidates have plenty of scope - but little time - to pick up support. In the first round, they won less than half of the votes between them and have fewer than 10 days to convince the other 55 percent.
Macron, decrying Le Pen as a "political heiress" and defending his experience in the private sector as a banker, urged people who had backed rivals such as conservative Francois Fillon or leftist Jean-Luc Melenchon to give him a chance.
"I will not consider a vote in my favour as a blank cheque," Macron told French television on Thursday night.
Eurosceptic Le Pen - simultaneously holding a rally in the southern city of Nice, where she described Macron as a "product of the system" - also sought to lure potential Fillon voters as she struck a more conciliatory tone on the European Union.
She said she wanted to replace the "grey" EU with a "happy" one and ommitted any mention of her anti-euro stance.
But she also pressed home her central message on putting the brakes on immigration and reinstating border checks in France, asking the 3,000 strong-crowd: "Mass immigation - more, or stop?" and drawing chants of "Stop!" from supporters.
FAR-LEFT FACTOR
One group that will be key is the 20 percent who chose far-left candidate Melenchon in the first round of voting on April 23.
Unlike the other main candidates who said they would vote for Macron to block the far-right, Melenchon has declined to give his view. His campaign has instead launched a survey of its members to see if they will vote for Macron or abstain, though voting for Le Pen is not an option.
Melenchon's "France Unbowed" movement had a similar anti-globalisation, pro-worker protection message to Le Pen's, but is sharply opposed to her position that immigration and radical Islam are at the roots of France's problems.
In Paris and the western city of Rennes on Thursday, riot police clashed with youths demonstrating against both candidates. Students have been holding "neither Le Pen, nor Macron" protests at high schools since Sunday's vote.
In an interview with Reuters, Christian Estrosi, the right-wing president of the southeastern region, said it was a mistake to take Le Pen's victory chances lightly.
"She can win. In my political family, some are wrong to neglect the risk and not to take the second round more seriously," he said.
Former Socialist Prime Minister Manuel Valls also echoed that message, telling BFM TV that Le Pen could win if people did not unite behind Macron.
Campaigning took a spectacular turn on Wednesday when Le Pen paid a surprise visit to a doomed Whirlpool appliance plant in her opponent's home town and promised to save it, just as Macron was meeting labour representatives behind closed doors nearby.
Macron later went to the site himself and, although he held his ground and the tension eventually eased, television channels repeatedly broadcast footage of him being heckled.
(To view a graphic on 'French presidential election' click here)
(Reporting by Leigh Thomas, Matthias Blamont, Emmanuel Jarry, and Ingrid Melander in Nice; Writing by John Irish and Sarah White; Editing by Tom Heneghan and Andrew Hay)


Question: Cricket: Tom Bruce ready to have a blast with Black Caps

Tom Bruce went mainstream on January 30 last year.
It was the Ford Trophy final at Pukekura Park, and Central Districts had decided to bat against Canterbury.
Bruce strode to the wicket with the Stags 281 for three in the 43rd over. With 43 balls left he could have worked the ball around and built on was already heading towards a competitive total.
Instead he swung the bat like a lumberjack who was late for supper. His channelling of world champion woodchopper Jason Wynyard saw seven sixes heaved into the upper tiers of the postage stamp ground. He finished on 71 from 23 balls and CD had an unassailable 405 for six.
The innings saw Bruce touted as a bolter for March's World T20. He wasn't, but had made his mark on the cricketing map.
Bruce's performances in other formats have also been prolific. He averages 46.51 after 21 first-class matches and 38.92 with a strike rate of 156 from 18 T20 outings.
His international call-up to the latter format seemed imminent.
In the McDonald's Super Smash Bruce sits sixth on the strike rate charts for those to score over 100 runs. His figure of 171.51 sits behind Colin De Grandhomme (222.63), Ross Taylor (178.02), Mitchell Santner (173.23), Jimmy Neesham (172.58) and Mahela Jayawardene (172.19). He clears the rope regularly; his 15 sixes are second to the 17 of Jayawardene and Hamish Rutherford this season.
"Tom's a consistent power hitter, and his craftsmanship and gamesmanship has gone to another level this season," selector Gavin Larsen said.
Bruce appears equally comfortable blasting through the off or legside. He looks a doppelganger for John R Reid in archive footage, with massive arms to match.
Continued below.
Related Content Cricket: The absence of the in-form and unlucky Ross Taylor Australia have eye on future, chasing Pakistan whitewash Cricket: Mitchell Santner a chance for breakout 2017
Playing for New Zealand will end the 25-year-old's pursuit of a career with Scotland, the birthplace of his father.
Bruce played for Scotland A in June, scoring 70 and 1, but never appeared for the national side coached by former New Zealand representative Grant Bradburn.
If he had, the decision would not have affected any immediate Black Caps aspirations.
Under the International Cricket Council eligibility rules there is no stand down period for players who represent an associate nation before a test-playing side.
Bruce sought advice from some experienced Central Districts counsel in the build-up to his debut.
"I had a good chat with Mahela [Jayawardene] and Ross [Taylor]. They said I'd been picked for a reason, and to play my natural game.
"The last few days have been surreal. I've had a couple of seasons on the domestic circuit but I feel like I've been around a while and played enough cricket to take my game to the next level."
Bruce was farewelled by Stags teammates at Auckland airport on New Year's Day as they prepare to play the Super Smash finals as top qualifier.
"It's a Catch-22. I found it tough to walk away, but making your debut is also a big occasion."
He's also hoping support arrives from his base in Stratford.
"It's a small town and it's special to represent them and the Taranaki region. I'm hopeful a few of the club guys will come over in full voice."
Left-armer Ben Wheeler is also in line to make his T20 international debut with Trent Boult rested. He's already played six ODIs, the last against South Africa in August 2015.
"His ability to swing the ball at a decent clip can trouble any batsmen, as he's shown in domestic cricket this season," Larsen said.
Napier hosts the opening Twenty20 tomorrow with the series shifting to Mount Maunganui for matches on January 6 and 8.
- NZ Herald

Cricket: David Willey made short work of the PM XI last night and has hailed the complete performance of the England side.


Question: represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it

Question: Billboards try to lure Arizona teachers to Texas: 'Starting salary at $52,000'

Arizona #RedforEd teacher rally at state Capitol Anna Cicero, (center left) a teacher and school counselor at Mesa Public Schools, waves an Arizona flag, as Julie Cieniawski, (center right) a teacher at Scottsdale Unified School District, holds a sign at a RedForEd rally at the Arizona Capitol in Phoenix on the second day of the Arizona teacher walkout on Friday, April 27, 2018. 01 / 55 Anna Cicero, (center left) a teacher and school counselor at Mesa Public Schools, waves an Arizona flag, as Julie Cieniawski, (center right) a teacher at Scottsdale Unified School District, holds a sign at a RedForEd rally at the Arizona Capitol in Phoenix on the second day of the Arizona teacher walkout on Friday, April 27, 2018. 01 / 55
asset not included because it is a duplicate of primary asset
PHOENIX — Several red billboards across the Phoenix area have a message for Arizona teachers.
"Your future is in a Fort Worth classroom."
The Fort Worth Independent School District is recruiting local educators, weeks after the historic #RedForEd walkout attracted more than 50,000 protesters and impacted 850,000 students.
"It just shows what so many educators already know — that we are undervalued and underpaid in Arizona," Noah Karvelis, a #RedForEd and Arizona Educators Untied organizer, told The Arizona Republic.
Kirstie Rylon, a teacher with the Paradise Valley Unified School District, takes home $970.51 every two weeks. She brought a paycheck stub and W2 to prove it. #Red4Ed @azcentral pic.twitter.com/LRBYWOgGb8 — Cydney Henderson (@CydHenderson) May 2, 2018
One element on the five billboards across the Phoenix metro area distinctively stands out.
"Teacher starting salary at $52,000."
"That's nearly 20,000 (dollars) more than I made in my first year in Arizona," Karvelis said. "That's why we have a teacher crisis. ... People simply can't afford to teach here any longer."
The number shows the pay disparity between Arizona teachers and neighboring states. The frustration about low teacher pay and the desperate need for student funding led to the six-day #RedForEd walkout.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed a state budget earlier this month that included nearly $273 million aimed at giving teachers pay raises. It came after nearly 13 hours of debate in the state House and Senate.
But the future of Arizona teachers remains unclear.
"Every year we lose incredible teachers to places like Fort Worth because we don't pay our teachers what they deserve," Karvelis added.
Dave Price, a social studies teacher at Mesa Public Schools, holds sign during a rally during the sixth day of the Arizona teacher walkout at Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza near the Arizona state Capitol in Phoenix on Thursday, May 3, 2018. Today will likely be the final day of the walkout as Governor Ducey signed an education funding bill into law early Thursday morning.
David Wallace/The Republic
The Fort Worth Independent School District started the campaign Monday with plans to keep the electronic billboards up for a month.
"Our goal isn't to steal teachers," Fort Worth school district spokesman Clint Bond told The Republic. "Our goal is to let people know there is another option."
The Forth Worth district did a similar campaign in Oklahoma earlier this month following the state’s own teacher protests and walkouts, which led to several new hires.
"We decided that was the kind of passion, dedication and commitment in the teachers we want to hire," Bond said when discussing the Oklahoma teacher walkouts.
Arizona is no different. Bond told The Republic that district officials weren't planning on recruiting in Phoenix until the historic rally took place.
"If you want to work where your dedication is appreciated and where you will have the tools needed to improve student achievement, then we want to talk with you," Forth Worth Superintendent Kent Scribner, who is a former Phoenix union leader said in a news release.
Copyright 2017 USATODAY.com

represent this text to find a news title for it

With a national debate on teachers' salaries, one Arizona teacher is sharing her frustrations to spark change.Through the help of social media, an elementary school teacher received a lot of support on social media after she posted her pay stub online.Second-grade teacher, Elisabeth Milich, took to social media that she earned just over $35,000 a year."My bi-weekly deposit is $639. $639. That's not sustainable," said Milich in an interview.Millich said she could not make ends meet without her husband's income.Arizona's Governor, Doug Ducey, says money available for teacher pay is up 9 percent since 2015.


Question: Represent this title to get a news article that provides more details about it.

Question: Boat slams into rocks injuring 5 people, 2 critically

This news article should be represented to find a fitting news title:

WOODBRIDGE, N.J. (AP) — A boat has slammed into some rocks in a major shipping channel that connects New Jersey and Staten Island, New York, injuring five people, two of them critically.
New Jersey State Police say the boat crashed into the rocks Sunday evening in the Arthur Kill channel near Woodbridge, New Jersey.
State police say eight people were aboard the boat at the time of the crash, but only five of them suffered injuries. Two of the injured remain hospitalized in critical condition.
It’s unclear what caused the crash, which remains under investigation.
Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

1:16 Entertaining sheriff's video has serious message: How not to let Grinch ruin your holiday Pause
1:00 Here's what you want to have ready to go in case of evacuation
1:19 California attorney general on DACA: 'We are ready to sue.'
2:15 Watch firefighters rescue struggling deer stranded on frozen lake
0:20 One person in custody after explosion in New York City
1:13 With his father Rae Carruth still in prison, Chancellor Lee Adams turns 18
2:56 Video shows Broward Sheriff's deputy fatally shooting Lauderdale Lakes man
2:32 Bodycam video released by Broward Sheriff's Office of fatal shooting of Lauderdale Lakes man
0:35 Fire burns along LA's 405 Freeway, evacuations ordered