<table>
            <tbody><tr style="FONT-SIZE: 1px">
                <td valign="top" width="5%">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top" width="5%">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top" width="90%">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2"><i>Business Combinations</i></font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations. Transaction costs are now required to be expensed as incurred and adjustments to the acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax position balances occurring outside the measurement period are recorded as a component of&nbsp;income tax expense, rather than goodwill, among other changes. In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative
                    guidance related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. Generally, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies must be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2009. As this guidance is applied prospectively to
                    business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the date the guidance became effective, the impact to the Company’s financial statements cannot be determined until any such transactions occur.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2"><i>Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity Disclosures</i></font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In March 2008, the FASB amended and expanded the disclosure requirements related to derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how an entity accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
                    revised guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This guidance, which provides only disclosure requirements, is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
                    early application encouraged. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2"><i>Fair Value Measurements</i></font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of fair value measurement and disclosure guidance for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November&nbsp;15, 2008.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance clarifying that fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants under current market conditions.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In August 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance clarifying the measurement of the fair value of a liability in circumstances when a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. The guidance emphasizes that entities should maximize the use of observable inputs in the absence of quoted prices when measuring the fair value of liabilities.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In September 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that provides further clarification for measuring the fair value of investments in entities that meet the FASB’s definition of an investment company. This guidance permits a company to estimate the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share of the investment if the net asset value is determined in accordance with the FASB’s guidance for investment
                    companies as of the company’s measurement date.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2"><i>Fair Value of Financial Instruments Disclosures</i></font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In April 2009, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance requiring disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, currently provided annually, to be included in interim financial statements. Since this guidance provides only disclosure requirements, the adoption of this standard is not expected to impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2"><i>Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables</i></font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
                </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                </td>

                <td valign="top">
                    <p align="justify"><font size="2">In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amends existing guidance for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables exist, and provides guidance for allocating and recognizing revenue based on those separate deliverables. The guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being separable than under current guidance. This guidance is effective
                    for the Company beginning on April 1, 2011 and is required to be applied prospectively to new or significantly modified revenue arrangements. Management currently believes that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.</font></p>
                </td>
            </tr>
        </tbody></table>
<table>
<tbody><tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font><i>Business Combinations</i></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations. Transaction costs are now required to be expensed as incurred and adjustments to the acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax position balances occurring outside the measurement period are recorded as a component of income tax expense, rather than goodwill, among other changes. In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative
                    guidance related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. Generally, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies must be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2009. As this guidance is applied prospectively to
                    business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the date the guidance became effective, the impact to the Company’s financial statements cannot be determined until any such transactions occur.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font><i>Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity Disclosures</i></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In March 2008, the FASB amended and expanded the disclosure requirements related to derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how an entity accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
                    revised guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This guidance, which provides only disclosure requirements, is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
                    early application encouraged. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font><i>Fair Value Measurements</i></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of fair value measurement and disclosure guidance for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance clarifying that fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants under current market conditions.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In August 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance clarifying the measurement of the fair value of a liability in circumstances when a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. The guidance emphasizes that entities should maximize the use of observable inputs in the absence of quoted prices when measuring the fair value of liabilities.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In September 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that provides further clarification for measuring the fair value of investments in entities that meet the FASB’s definition of an investment company. This guidance permits a company to estimate the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share of the investment if the net asset value is determined in accordance with the FASB’s guidance for investment
                    companies as of the company’s measurement date.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font><i>Fair Value of Financial Instruments Disclosures</i></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In April 2009, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance requiring disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, currently provided annually, to be included in interim financial statements. Since this guidance provides only disclosure requirements, the adoption of this standard is not expected to impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font><i>Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables</i></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p><font>In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that amends existing guidance for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables exist, and provides guidance for allocating and recognizing revenue based on those separate deliverables. The guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being separable than under current guidance. This guidance is effective
                    for the Company beginning on April 1, 2011 and is required to be applied prospectively to new or significantly modified revenue arrangements. Management currently believes that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>