text: for instance,the majority assumes that it would not be plausible,ante,at,for congress to have thought that interstate crimes are worse than wholly intrastate crimes.perhaps.but when faced with an offense that,like arson,admits of a range of conduct,from the minor to the serious,congress could plausibly have concluded that arsons prosecuted as federal crimes are more uniformly serious than arsons prosecuted as state crimes and counted only the former as aggravated felonies.see,klein et,why federal prosecutors charge a comparison of federal and new york state arson and robbery filings,houston,finding that arsons prosecuted federally involve more property damage and more injury than arsons prosecuted under state law.