text: looking for consistency in the aggravated felony provisions of the ina is often a fool errand.see kawashima,at,slip,at,ginsburg,dissenting noting the absurdity of making a tax misdemeanor,but not driving while drunk and causing serious bodily injury,an aggravated felony.but the structure of the ina gives the court no reason to read the aggravated felony provisions as broadly as possible that is why this court has repeatedly cautioned against interpreting the aggravated felony section to sweep in offenses that like many state arson convictions may be neither aggravated nor felonies.see,at brief for national association of criminal defense lawyers et as amici curiae collecting state misdemeanor arson statutes.