Let's move ahead.  The details appear to be complete. Thanks.




Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/12/2000 11:01 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Tony Apps/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
crankin@velaw.com, Lutz Speidel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard 
A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Christiaan 
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: Re: Draft letter to lenders - Approval By-pass Stack Damper Position 
 

Rob -

 I discussed the issue with S&W and they agreed with our approach.  They ask 
that we formalize the process.  Should the attached letter be sent to the 
banks or to S&W?  Pls let me know as we need to get this issue resolved.

rgds

Laine




Christiaan Huizer
12-12-2000 02:40 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Tony Apps/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
crankin@velaw.com, Lutz Speidel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: Draft letter to lenders - Approval By-pass Stack Damper Position  

See attached for your review draft letter requesting approval from the 
lenders regarding the by-pass stack damper position. Please advise soonest of 
your comments.

Regards,

Christiaan





Laine A Powell
12/09/2000 09:56 AM
To: Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  
Subject: RE: CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position

Christiaan -

 I spoke with Brad and Sue of Stone and Webster about this issue.  They don't 
have a problem with what we are proposing to do.  Pls work up a paper on the 
issue so we can send it to the banks formally.

rgds

Laine

---------------------- Forwarded by Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
09-12-2000 01:55 PM ---------------------------


"Rankin, Cliff" <CRankin@velaw.com> on 30-11-2000 02:17:22 PM
To: "Powell, Laine (Enron)" <laine.a.powell@enron.com>
cc: Christiaan.Huizer@enron.com, "Novak, John (Enron)" 
<john.novak@enron.com>, Allan.Smithe@enron.com 

Subject: RE: CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position


As far as I'm concerned this is fine if that is the deal.  However, I would
suggest that Owner obtain the Lenders' agreement to the position as it
constitutes a change to the Performance Tests under the EPC Contract.  See
Section 8.12(b)(ii)(D) of the Common Terms Agreement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Laine.A.Powell@enron.com [mailto:Laine.A.Powell@enron.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 3:11 PM
To: Stephen.P.Stein@enron.com
Cc: Tony.Apps@enron.com; Christiaan.Huizer@enron.com;
John.Novak@enron.com; CRankin@velaw.com; Alan_Smithe@parsons.com;
Allan.Smithe@enron.com
Subject: Re: CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position


Steve -

     This letter is being sent to counsel for review.

rgds

Laine

Cliff -

     Pls take a look at the attached letter.  From a technical
point-of-view we have no problem with the letter.

rgds

Laine





---------------------- Forwarded by Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
16-11-2000 05:42 PM ---------------------------


Stephen P Stein
16-11-2000 03:54 PM

To:   Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Re: CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position  (Document link:
      A Laine Powell 2000)

Laine,

This letter could be titled "Suggested Carve Out Language for Gatwick
Accord.  This is a response to your request for Language which we would
want to see in order  to go ahead and execute the Gatwick Accord.  Our main
issue results from our not wanting to be reposition the By-Pass Damper
after we finish Combined Cycle Oil Commissioning.

We structured this letter as a stand alone letter agreement so that we do
not need to wait until the EOT claim is executed to sign the Gatwick Accord
nor would we need to change the current language in the Gatwick Accord.

rgds

Steve





Laine A Powell
11/16/2000 09:35 AM

To:   Brian T Doughty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Allan Smithe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lutz
      Speidel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
      Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan_Smithe@parsons.com
Subject:  Re: CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position  (Document link:
      Stephen P Stein)

Brian -

     What is the logic for the Gatwick carve out being in this letter?
Should it be a stand alone issue?  Not upset or excited in the least just
curious.

rgds

Laine




Luciana Souza
13-11-2000 09:55 AM

To:   Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Brian T Doughty@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
      Gronewold/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
      Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
      Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
      Guidry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ken
      Charlton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
      Shain/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tony
      Apps/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nathan
      Newman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  CUI-OD-3190 - By-pass Stack Damper Position

Dear Mr. Powell,

Please find attached electronic copy of our letter EECC-CUI-OD-3190 signed
by Mr. Doughty. Hard copy of letter and attachment to follow by fax and
hands.

Best Regards,

Luciana Souza
Project Secretary
(See attached file: PECui-Od-3190.doc)












          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You