Könnten 10-15 Millionen Kongolesen während der Herrschaft von Leopold II. gestorben sein?
Ich kann eher schätzungen von 8 bis 10 millionen todesopfern finden, diese sind jedoch sehr grob und ungenau, da die todesfälle kaum protokolliert wurden.
Twentieth Century Atlas - Death Tolls
Congo Free State (1886-1908): 8,000,000 [ make link ] Roger Casement's original 1904 report estimated that as many as 3 million Congolese had died of disease, torture or shooting since 1888 (cited in Gilbert's History of the Twentieth Century ; also in Colin Legum, Congo Disaster (1972)). E.D. Morel estimated that the Congo’s population began with an original 20 or 30 million, and bottomed out at a mere 8 million. Morel, The Black Man's Burden , 1920, Chapter 9 ("[W]hen the country had been explored in every direction by travellers of divers nationalities, estimates varied between twenty and thirty millions. No estimate fell below twenty millions. In 1911 an official census was taken. It was not published in Belgium, but was reported in one of the British Consular dispatches. It revealed that only eight and a half million people were left."). This estimate also appears in Encyclopaedia Britannica , 15th edition, "Congo Free State," v.3, p.535 Bertrand Russell, Freedom and organization 1814-1914 (first published, George Allen & 1934) p.453 in the 2001 Routledge ed., citing Sir H. H. Johnston, The Colonization of Africa (Cambridge Historical Series) p. 352 Fredric Wertham A Sign For Cain : A Exploration of Human Violence (1966): the population of the Congo dropped dropped from 30M to 8.5M, a loss of 21.5 million Peter Forbath, The River Congo (1977) p.375: "at least 5 million people were killed in the Congo." John Gunther ( Inside Africa (1953)): 5-8 million deaths. Adam Hochschild ( Leopold's Ghost , (1998)): 10 million, or half the original population. Rummel: 2,150,000 democides, 19th Century (based on 10% of Wertham) 25,000 democides, 1900-1910. AVERAGE: Median: ca. 8M Mean: ca. 8.5M NOTE: Because this event began in 1886, it tend to get relegated to the 19th Century; however, 40% of it occured in the 20th Century, so we need to keep this in mind when splitting the death toll into century-based subtotals. Also, it took awhile for the atrocities to get up to speed, so the dying probably intensified as more time passed. First World War (1914-18): 15,000,000 [ make link ] WW1 Soldiers This is the only major bloodletting which has pretty much the same body count no matter which source I check: 8,500,000 military deaths. It all goes back to a report issued by the U.S. War Dept. in Feb. 1924, amended by the Statistical Services Center, Office of the Secretary of Defense on 7 Nov. 1957, which everyone ("everyone" = Brzezinski, Britannica , Norman Davies, Encarta , Gilbert, Hammond, Small & Singer, Wallechinsky) more or less agrees with. Among my major sources, only Eckhardt and Urlanis diverge from the mainstream. In The Defeat of Imperial Germany 1917-1918 , Rod Paschall cites a study by Arthur Banks. I've also consulted John Ellis & Michael Cox, The World War I Databook ("E&C"
http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm
Fest steht jedenfalls, dass es den belgischen kolonisten um wirtschaftliche ausbeutung ging und das leben der einheimischen ihnen nichts wert war.