 will benefit from any proposal. This is mostly because of few cost reductions or few cost savings for consumers, but there are also other benefits and some of the benefits are not even included here. For example, health benefits from air pollution, which are not taken into account by these commission figures. So even taking the commission figures, it is clear that the technologies for reducing CO2 emissions by more than the proposed 30% are available and they are also cost effective. The second point I want to make is that these results are very conservative.