\section{Introduction}

In 1988, Jacquet and Shalika \cite{JS88} first established an integral representation for the exterior square $L$-function $L(s,\Pi,\wedge^2)$
associated to a (unitary) cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi$ on ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_k)$, where $\mathbb{A}_k$ is the ad\`{e}les of a number field $k$.
Just a year later, Bump and Friedberg \cite{BF89} independently constructed a different Rankin-Selberg integral representing the exterior square $L$-function
$L(s_1,\Pi)L(s_2,\Pi,\wedge^2)$ with two variables $s_1$ and $s_2$ for a (unitary) cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi$ on ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_k)$,
where $k$ is a global field this time. After factoring $\Pi$ into its local component $\Pi \cong (\otimes_{v| \infty} \Pi_v) \otimes (\otimes'_{v < \infty} \Pi_v)$ with $\otimes'$ a restricted tensor product,
the local calculation for Jacquet-Shalika and Bump-Friedberg integrals attached to $\Pi_v$ has been only carried out at the non-arichimedean $(v < \infty)$ unramified places.
Somewhat surprisingly, as it turned out, it was the Bump-Friedberg integrals for $\Pi_v$ at archimedean $(v | \infty)$ places that came to fruition first.
Unlike Jacquet-Shalika integrals, the computation of Archimedean Bump-Friedberg integrals for spherical representations was substantially performed by Stade \cite{Sta90} around the same time of early 1990's. The definitions for $L$-factors $L(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2)$ and $L(s,t,\Pi_v,{\rm BF})$, $\gamma$-factors $\gamma(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\psi)$ and $\gamma(s,t,\Pi_v,{\rm BF},\psi)$ and their functional equations were much less well understood, when $v < \infty$ is a ramified place \cite{JS88,BF89}.

\par
Recently there has been renewed interest to complete the local theory of the exterior square $L$-function via these integral representations over non-archimedean $(v < \infty)$ ramified places. In particular, in a flurry of work of Matringe \cite{CM15,Mat14,Mat15-2,Mat15,Mat17} and his joint paper with Cogdell \cite{CM15}, Matringe used his result on the connection between linear periods and Shalika periods \cite{Mat14} to formulate the precise definition of local exterior $L$-function and its local functional equation at ramified places. Furthermore, he subsequently gave local exterior square $\gamma$-factors and $\varepsilon$-factors which had long been expected.

\par
We now illustrate the result more accurately. We let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field, and then fix a non-trivial additive character $\psi$. We denote by $q$ the cardinality of the residue field of $F$. Let $\pi$ be an irreducible generic representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ and $\check{\pi}$ its contragredient representation of $\pi$ with associated Whittaker models $\mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$ and $\mathcal{W}(\check{\pi},\psi^{-1})$. For each Whittaker function $W \in \mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$, and each Schwartz-Bruhat function $\Phi$ belonging to a space of locally constant and compactly supported functions, we associate Jacquet-Shalika integrals $J(s,W,\Phi)$, which generate a $\mathbb{C}[q^{\pm s}]$-fractional ideal $\mathcal{J}(\pi)$. The ideal $\mathcal{J}(\pi)$ is spanned by
normalized generators of the form $P(q^{-s})^{-1}$, where the polynomial $P(X) \in \mathbb{C}[X]$ satisfies $P(0)=1$. The local exterior square $L$-function $L(s,\pi,\wedge^2)$ is defined to be such a unique greatest common divisor $P(q^{-s})^{-1}$  \cite{CM15,Mat14,Jo20,Jo21}. Further, two Jacquet-Shalika integrals $J(s,W,\Phi)$ and $J(1-s,\check{\pi}(\tau_n)\check{W},\hat{\Phi})$ are related by a functional equation, where $\check{W}$ is a Whittaker function for a dual representation $\check{\pi}$, $\tau_n$ is a certain Weyl element, and $\hat{\Phi}$ is a Fourier transform of $\Phi$. Taking the one dimensionality of Shalika periods for granted, a local exterior square gamma factor $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ is a rational function in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s})$ given as a proportionality factor  \cite{CM15,Mat14}. The $L$-factor $L(s,\pi,\wedge^2)$ and the $\gamma$-factor $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ are associated in a standard way:
\begin{equation}
\label{RS-relation}
  \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\frac{\varepsilon(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)L(1-s,\check{\pi},\wedge^2)}{L(s,\pi,\wedge^2)},
\end{equation}
where $\varepsilon(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ is a monomial factor in $\mathbb{C}[q^{\pm s}]$.

\par
Matringe put local Bump-Friedberg factors $L(s,\pi,{\rm BF})$, $\gamma(s,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$, and $\varepsilon(s,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$
on the equal footing with the Jacquet-Shalika setting by working out the case of one parameter $s$ for $s_1=s+1/2$ and $s_2=2s$ \cite{Mat15}. Afterwords, local Bump-Friedberg factors are extended to
their corresponding ones $L(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF})$, $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$, and $\varepsilon(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$ with two complex variables $s$ and $t$ for $s_1=s+t+1/2$ and $s_2=2s$ \cite{Mat17}.
In order to interpolate two variables, one needs to introduce an auxiliary character $\delta_t$, and then fixes an arbitrary value $t$, but varies $s$.
On the other hand, long before Rankin-Selberg convolutions for exterior square $L$-function were actively investigated, Shahidi had already developed an Eisenstein series on a symplectic group
whose global functional equation implies that of the exterior square $L$-function \cite{Sha78,Sha81,Sha90}. This framework is nowadays known as the Langlands-Shahidi method of analyzing global $L$-functions
through the Fourier coefficients of Eisenstein series. Locally, the Langlands-Shahidi method relies on the theory of  the Langlands-Shahid local coefficient $C_{\psi}(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)$,
which is another constant of proportionality arising from the uniqueness of Whittaker models for parabolically induced reprsentations. A list of Langlands-Shahidi local exterior square factors
$L_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2)$, $\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$, and $\varepsilon_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ can be thereupon defined through the local coefficient $C_{\psi}(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)$ satisfying
\begin{multline}
\label{LS-relation}
 C_{\psi}(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)=\gamma(s,\pi,\psi)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)
 \\
  \text{and} \;\;\;
  \gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\frac{\varepsilon_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)L_{\rm LS}(1-s,\check{\pi},\wedge^2)}{L_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2)},
\end{multline}
where $\gamma(s,\pi,\psi)$ denotes a Godement-Jacquet $\gamma$-factor built in \cite{GJ72}. Lomel\'{i} thereafter generalized the Langlands-Shahidi method to a global function field
for the case of a Siegel Levi subgroup of a split classical group or a quasi-split unitary group \cite{Lom09,Lom15,Lom16}. All aforementioned three approaches are fundamentally different, because the first two methodologies
construct local factors by studying various integrals of automorphic forms, whereas the last methodology construct local factors as normalizing factors of local intertwining operators.
There are many situations of considerable interest where both Rankin-Selberg and Langlands-Shahidi constructions are available, and it is a non-trivial problem to verify that the resulting local factors ought to be identical, perhaps up to normalization of certain Haar measures. Along the line of this philosophy, Bump and Friedberg has predicted the following pattern of local $\gamma$-factors especially from a spherical situation that $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$ is a product of the exterior square $\gamma$-factor and the standard $\gamma$-factor.

\begin{conjecture}$($\cite[Conjecture 4]{BF89}$)$ Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field and $\pi$ an irreducible generic representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$. Then we have
\[
  \gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
\end{conjecture}

The main aim of this article is to shed some lights on the above identities. The analogous statement for local $L$-functions has been settled by combining the work of Matringe \cite{Mat15,Mat17} with the author \cite{Jo20,Jo21}.
With \eqref{RS-relation} and \eqref{LS-relation}, a reformulation for local $\varepsilon$-factor can be viewed as a simple consequence of Conjecture.
A keen audience may notice the discrepancy of the Tate $\gamma$-factor appearing in \cite[Conjecture 4]{BF89}. The issue boils down to the choice between Schwartz-Bruhat functions $\Phi$
and good sections in the sense of Piatetski-Shapiro and Rallis attached to local zeta integrals. This subject has been widely taken up in \cite{Jo20-2}. At least, Conjecture can be confirmed
 for any characters $\widetilde{\eta}$ of ${\rm GL}_1(F) \cong F^{\times}$, and we advise the reader to consult Section \ref{sec3-Whittaker} for undefined terminologies in Theorem \ref{main} below.

\begin{taggedtheorem}{A}[Theorems \ref{LocalCoefficient} and \ref{Gelfand-Grev}]
\label{main}
Let $G={\rm SL}_2(F)$ over a non-archimedean local field $F$. Suppose that $\psi$ is a fixed additive character of level $0$. Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ satisfying
$\eta^2=1$ with level $n_{\eta}$. Let $\widetilde{\eta}$ be any extension of $\eta$. Then we have
\[
  C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta},{\rm w}_0)=\widetilde{\eta}(-\varpi^{n_{\eta}})\tau(\eta,\psi,\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})q^{-n_{\eta}(s-1)}=\gamma(s,\widetilde{\eta},\psi).
\]
Moreover, we put $\epsilon=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)$. As $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$-module isomorphisms, we get
\[
({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}} \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon}
 \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{-1}.
\]

\end{taggedtheorem}

Our strategy to tackle the problem of computing local coefficient on $F^{\times}$ inside ${\rm SL}_2(F)$ is inspired by the pioneering work of Casselman \cite{Cas80},
where local coefficients in the context of unramified principal series representations are explicitly computed. The computation there relies on finding the effect of
the intertwining operator on the subspace of vectors fixed by the Iwahori subgroup. The role played by the trivial representation of the Iwahori subgroup in Casselman's trick can be regarded
as an extreme incident of the theory of types and covers. Later, types and covers are adapted by Krishnamurthy and Kutzko \cite{KK} for a split cover $(\eta^2 \neq 1)$ of   ${\rm SL}_2(F)$, and by
the author's joint work with Krishnamurthy \cite{JK21} for a cover of a homogeneous pair $(\pi_1, \pi_2)$ of the Levi subgroup ${\rm GL}_n(F) \times {\rm GL}_n(F) $ inside ${\rm GL}_{2n}(F)$.
In the course of the computation for $\pi_1 \times \pi_2$ of ${\rm GL}_n(F) \times {\rm GL}_n(F) $ \cite[\S 5.3]{JK21}, one of the most crucial step in the proof is to express the principal series block of
the Gelfand-Graev representation, ${\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi}$, as a cyclic Hecke algebra module.
This types of results was originally treated by Chan-Savin for unramified principal series blocks of split reductive groups  \cite{CS18}, and was further refined by Mishra-Pattanaya for principal series blocks for connected reductive groups over $F$ whose residue characteristic is large enough \cite{MP21}.
Benefiting from \cite{JK21}, it is our belief that this certain Hecke algebra module structure of
the isotypic component of the space of compactly supported Whittaker functions, $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$, is expected to be responsible for computing local coefficients in more general settings, notably, Siegel Levi subgroups inside ${\rm Sp}_{2n}(F)$. Section \ref{Intertwining O} is devoted to reviewing the primary concepts of types, covers, and intertwining operators for ${\rm SL}_2(F)$. In Section \ref{sec3-Whittaker}, we complete the remaining case of non-split cover $(\eta^2=1)$ for ramified characters $\widetilde{\eta}$ (see \cite[\S 3.4.(2)]{KK}), and then extend the structure theory of the Gelfand-Graev representation for ${\rm SL}_2(F)$ without any assumption on non-archimedean local fields $F$.
\par
For higher rank symplectic groups in $2n$-variables, Conjecture holds for all level zero supercuspidal representations of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$.
The reader consults the end of \cite[\S 5]{YZ21} for pertinent discussion.

\begin{taggedtheorem}{B}[Theorems \ref{exter-positive}, \ref{equal-zero-exterior}, and \ref{main-BF-factor}]
\label{mainB}
Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field and $\pi$ a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$. Then we have
\[
  \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
In particular, if the characteristic of the field $F$ is positive, we obtain
\[
  \gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
\end{taggedtheorem}

 In contrast to purely local means in Theorem \ref{main}, a key feature of our tactic is to utilize a globalization of level zero supercuspidal representations over function fields equipped with a close field theory.
In a series of versions of globalizing (non)supercuspidal representation over number fields, one typically loses control of the local component of
a (unitary) cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi$ exactly at one place of $k$, an archimedean place. While the Langlands-Shahidi
theory over archimedean fields has been fairly well navigated since the seminal work of Shahidi \cite{Sha85}, there has been little progress on the desired archimedean input for
Bump-Friedberg and Jacquet-Shalika integrals. However the globalization of level zero supercuspidal representations in positive characteristic gives rather good control at all places.
 Although one may sacrifice a few local places, the necessary equalities of exterior square $\gamma$-factors for irreducible constituents of spherical representations at those bad places
 do not appear to be insurmountable.

 \par
 Having a solid matching of $\gamma$-factors for level zero supercuspidal representations over characteristic $p > 0$ in hand, we then incorporate $\gamma$-factors arising from Langlands-Shahidi methods and integral representations with Deligne-Kazhdan theory over close local fields.
 Deligne \cite[Proposition 3.7.1]{Del84} proved that Artin local factors remain the same for corresponding representations over close local fields via  Deligne isomorphisms. An analogous result has been studied by Ganapathy and Lomel\'{\i} \cite{Gan15,GL15} for Langlands-Shahidi local factors on analytic sides, though that time they only consider Kazhdan isomorphisms over sufficiently closed local fields.
So far, there seems to have been no previous discourse in the literature about a very basic case of $``1"$-close local fields. To be precise, we will show that local exterior square $\gamma$-factors for level zero supercuspidal representations via Jacquet-Shalika integrals are compatible with
 the Kazhdan correspondence over $1$-close local fields.
 In doing so, we are ultimately allowed to transport the identity of $\gamma$-factors over positive characteristic to characteristic zero.
 This work will be done in Section \ref{exterior-square}. Overall, this procedure might be quite contrary to the general perception from local $L$-factors \cite{Jo20,Mat15} that the number fields are easier to deal with than function fields, and having some archimedean places is a blessing instead of a curse, because of the breakthrough work over archimedean fields done by Shahidi \cite{Sha85}.

 \par
With regard to Bump-Friedberg $\gamma$-factor in Theorem \ref{mainB}, the positivity assumption on the characteristic of the field $F$ might be possibly redundant. It likely involves a better understanding of
 Bump-Friedberg integrals for level zero supercuspidal representations (refer to Remark \ref{rmk-gauss} for related discussion). Nonetheless, our method in Jacquet-Shalika $\gamma$-factors opens the door to proving similar identities in characteristic zero, and consider this manuscript as ground work in this direction. In spirit of \cite[Remark 2.6]{HL13}, it is also interesting to see that one might implement the equality of $\gamma$-factors for whole supercuspidal representations, once so called ``multiplicativity" of $\gamma$-factors for just principal series representations is established. Generalizing the recursive formula on radial parts \cite[Lemmata 6.1 and 7.4]{HJ21} will enable us to make substantial progress on multiplicativity. The author currently pursues these topics with E. Zelingher \cite{YZ20, YZ21}.  Although all this analysis seems to be doable, if somewhat involved, we think that our present formulation keeps our exposition a reasonable length and sufficient for further applications.

\section{Intertwining Operators for {\rm SL}(2)}
\label{Intertwining O}

\subsection{Types and Covers}
\label{TC}

Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field with its residual finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ of order $q$.
The base field $F$ is a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$ or $\mathbb{F}_p((t))$, called a {\it $p$-adic field} in characteristic 0,
or a {\it local function field} in characteristic $p > 0$.
Let $\mathfrak{o}_F$ be its ring of integers, $\mathfrak{p}_F$ its maximal ideal, $q_F$ the cardinality of its residue field.
We fix a generator $\varpi_F$ of $\mathfrak{p}_F$ and normalize the absolute value $|\cdot|$ of $F$ so that
$|\varpi_F|=q_F^{-1}$. When there is no possibility of confusion, we sometimes drop the subscripts, while working over a fixed $F$.
We let $G={\rm SL}_2(F)$. Let $B$ be the subgroup of $F$-points of the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices. Then $B=TU$, where
\[
 T= \left\{  \begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & a^{-1} \end{pmatrix} \, \middle| \, a \in F^{\times} \right\};
\quad
  U= \left\{ u(x):= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \, \middle| \, x \in F \right\}.
\]
In particular, we identify $T$ with  $F^{\times}$ when no confusion can arise. Let $\overline{B}=T\overline{U}$ denote the opposite Borel subgroup of lower triangular matrices, where
\[
 \overline{U}= \left\{ \overline{u}(x):= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ x & 1 \end{pmatrix} \, \middle| \, x \in F \right\}.
\]
Let $K=G(\mathfrak{o})$ be a maximal compact subgroup and let ${\rm \bf W}=N_G(T) \slash T=\{ 1_2,{\rm w}_0\}$, where
\[
  {\rm w}_0=\begin{pmatrix} 0  & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \quad \text{and} \quad 1_2=\begin{pmatrix} 1  &  0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.
\]
The character $\chi_s$ is given by the formula
\[
  \chi_s \left( \begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & a^{-1} \end{pmatrix}  \right)=|a|^s.
\]
We may view it as a character of $B$ by extending $\chi_s$ trivially to $U$. Let $\delta$ denote the modulus
character of $B$: explicitly,
\[
  \delta \left( \begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & a^{-1} \end{pmatrix}  \right)=|a|^2.
\]
For any topological group $H$, we write $\widehat{H}$ to denote the group of continuous homomorphism from $H$ to $\mathbb{C}^{\times}$.
In particular, we are interested in the character group $\widehat{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}$.
Let $\prescript{0}{}{T}:=T \cap K$. In particular, $\prescript{0}{}{T} \simeq \mathfrak{o}^{\times}$.
Then $T \slash \prescript{0}{}{T}$ is a free abelian group of rank $1$.
Let $X(T)$ denote the group of continuous homomorphisms of $T$ into $\mathbb{C}^{\times}$ which are trivial on $\prescript{0}{}{T}$ --
called the group of unramified characters of $T$. Moreover $X(T)$ is equipped with the structure of a complex variety
whose ring of regular functions is $\mathbb{C}[T \slash \prescript{0}{}{T}] \simeq \mathbb{C}[t,t^{-1}]$.

\par
By a {\it a cuspidal pair} in $G$, we mean a pair $(M,\sigma)$ in $G$,
where $M$ is either $T$ or $G$,
and $\sigma$ is a supercuspidal representation of $M$.
Two such pairs $(M_i,\sigma_i)$, $i=1,2$, are said to be
{\it inertially equivalent} if there exist $g \in G$ and an unramified character $\chi$ of $G$
such that $M_2=M_1^g=g^{-1}M_1g$, and $\sigma_2$ is equivalent to the representation
$\sigma_1^g \otimes \chi : x \mapsto \sigma_1(gxg^{-1})\chi(x)$ of $M_2$.
We denote by $[(M,\sigma)]_G$ the $G$-inertial equivalence class of a cuspidal pair $(M,\sigma)$ in $G$.
Let $\mathfrak{B}(G)$ denote the set of inertial equivalence classes of cuspidal pairs in $G$.

\par
It is a fundamental result of Bernstein (cf. \cite[\S 1.4]{Kut04}) that $\mathfrak{R}(G)$ of smooth complex representations of $G$ decomposes into a product of
full subcategories
\[
  \mathfrak{R}(G) \cong \prod_{\mathfrak{s} \in \mathfrak{B}(G)}  \mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}}(G).
\]
We divide the equivalence classes into what is known as {\it supercuspidal blocks} and {\it principal series blocks}.
For each irreducible supercuspidal representation $\sigma$ of $G$, we write $\mathfrak{s}(\sigma)$ for the equivalence class of $\sigma$ in $\mathfrak{R}(G)$.
We let $\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}(\sigma)}(G)$ be the full subcategory of $ \mathfrak{R}(G)$ whose objects are isomorphic to sums of copies of $\sigma$.

\par
Let $\iota^{G}_{B}$ denote the functor of normalized parabolic induction and for any character $\chi$ of $T$, and
let $\mathcal{F}_B(\chi)$ denote the space of $\iota^{G}_{B}(\chi)$.
Let $\widetilde{\eta}$ be an
extension of a character $\eta$ to $F^{\times}$, where $\eta=\widetilde{\eta}|_{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}$.
Let $\widetilde{\eta}_i$, $i=1,2$, be characters of $T$. Then $\widetilde{\eta}_2$ is $G$-inertially equivalent to
$\widetilde{\eta}_1$ if and only if $\eta_2=\eta_1^{\pm 1}$. We denote this equivalent class by $\mathfrak{s}_{\eta}$.
We let $\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}_{\eta}}(G)$ be the full subcategory of $\mathfrak{R}(G)$ whose irreducible objects are
exactly those that occur as a subquotient of some $\iota^G_Q(\widetilde{\eta} \otimes \chi_s)$, where
$Q$ is either $B$ or $\overline{B}$.

\par
With $\widetilde{\eta}_i$, $i=1,2$, as above, $\widetilde{\eta}_1$ is $T$-inertially equivalent to $\widetilde{\eta}_2$
if and only if there exist $s \in \mathbb{C}$ such that $\widetilde{\eta}_2=\widetilde{\eta}_1\chi_s$.
Let $\mathfrak{t}_{\eta}$ be the corresponding $T$-inertially equivalent class.
Let $ \mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{t}_{\eta}}(T)$ be the full subcategory of $\mathfrak{R}(T)$
whose object $(\pi,V)$ has the property that $\pi(x)v=\eta(x)v$ for all $x \in \prescript{0}{}{T}$ and $v \in V$.
Then the category $\mathfrak{R}(T)$ similarly decomposes as
a product of its subcategories $\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{t}_{\eta}}(T)$:
\[
\mathfrak{R}(T) \cong  \prod_{\eta \in \widehat{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}} \mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{t}_{\eta}}(T).
\]
Let $J$ be a compact open subgroup of $G$, let $(\lambda,W)$ be a smooth irreducible representation of $J$, and write $(\check{\lambda},\check{W})$
for the contragredient representation. Then $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)$ is the space of compactly supported function $f : G \rightarrow \mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{C}}(\check{W})$ that satisfy
\[
  f(hxk)=\check{\lambda}(h)f(x)\check{\lambda}(k),\quad x \in G,\;\; h,k \in J.
\]
It is a unital (associative) algebra with respect to the standard convolution operation
\[
  f \star g(y)=\int_{G} f(x) g(x^{-1}y) \, dx, \quad f,g \in \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda), \;\; y \in G,
\]
where we normalized the Haar measure on $G$ such that ${\rm vol}(J)=1$.
An element $x \in G$ is called {\it intertwine} $\lambda$ if $\lambda(xkx^{-1})=\lambda(k)$, $k \in J \cap x^{-1}Jx$.
It is equivalent to saying that the double coset $JxJ$ supports a non-zero function in $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)$ \cite[\S 2.2]{Kut04}.
A pair $(J,\lambda)$ is said to be a {\it type} for $\mathfrak{s} \in \mathfrak{B}(G)$, or simply a $\mathfrak{s}$-{\it type}  if
for every irreducible object $(\pi,V) \in \mathfrak{R}(G)$, we have $(\pi,V) \in \mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}}(G)$
if and only if $\pi$ contains $\lambda$, that is to say, the space of $\lambda$-covariants $V_{\lambda}:=\mathrm{Hom}_J(W,V)$ is non-trivial.
We similarly define the Hecke algebra $\mathcal{H}(G,\check{\lambda})$. There is a canonical anti-isomorphism $f \mapsto \check{f}$ from
$\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda) \rightarrow \mathcal{H}(G,\check{\lambda})$ given by $\check{f}(g)=(f(g^{-1}))^{\vee}$.
For $a \in \mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{C}}(\check{W})$, $a^{\vee}$ denote the transpose of $a$ with respect to
the canonical pairing between $W$ and $\check{W}$. There is a natural left $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)-{\rm Mod}$ structure
(also denoted as $\pi$) given by
\[
  (f\star \phi)(w):=(\pi(f)\phi)(w)=\int_G \pi(g)\phi(f(g)^{\vee}w) \,dg
\]
for $\phi \in V_{\lambda}$, $w \in W$, and $f \in \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)$.
For  $\mathfrak{s}$-type $(J,\lambda)$, the map $V \mapsto V_{\lambda}$ induces an equivalence of
categories $\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}}(G) \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)-{\rm Mod}$.

\par
We fix a non-trivial (ramified) character $\eta$ of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ such that $\eta^2=1$.
We let $n_{\eta}$ to be the smallest number $n$ so that $1+\mathfrak{p}^n \subset \ker \eta$.
The compact open subgroup is given by
\[
  J_{\eta}=\left\{ \begin{pmatrix} c_{11} & c_{12} \\ c_{21} & c_{22} \end{pmatrix} \in G \, \middle| \, c_{11},c_{22} \in \mathfrak{o}^{\times},  c_{12} \in \mathfrak{o},
  c_{21} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}  \right\},
\]
and $\lambda_{\eta}$ is a function on $J_{\eta}$ given by
\[
 \lambda_{\eta} \left(  \begin{pmatrix} c_{11} & c_{12} \\ c_{21} & c_{22} \end{pmatrix} \right)=\eta(c_{11}).
\]
It follows from \cite{Kut04} that the pair $(J_{\eta},\lambda_{\eta})$ is a $G$-cover for $(\prescript{0}{}{T},\eta)$.
We recall certain crucial properties of a $G$-cover $(J_{\eta},\lambda_{\eta})$:
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\alph*})$]
 \item\label{Iwahori} $J_{\eta}=(J_{\eta} \cap \overline{U})\prescript{0}{}{T}(J_{\eta} \cap U)$.
  \item\label{kernel} The representation $\lambda_{\eta}$ is trivial on $J_{\eta} \cap \overline{U}$ and $J_{\eta} \cap U$, while $\lambda_{\eta}|_{\prescript{0}{}{T}}=\eta$.
  The pair $(J_{\eta},\lambda_{\eta})$ is a type for $\mathfrak{s}_{\eta}$.
   \item\label{injection} There is a support preserving injective algebra map
$     t_Q : \mathcal{H}(T,\eta) \rightarrow \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$
   that realizes the parabolic induction functor $\iota_Q^G$ at the level of Hecke algebras.
    It means that the following diagram commutes:
    \[
    \xymatrixcolsep{4pc}
\xymatrixrowsep{2pc}
    \xymatrix{
 \mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{t}_{\eta}}(T) \ar[d]_{\iota_Q^G} \ar[r]^{\hspace{-2em}\cong}
& {\mathcal H}(T,\eta){\rm -Mod} \ar[d]^{(t_Q)_{\ast}} \\
\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}_{\eta}}(G)  \ar[r]^{\hspace{-2em}\cong} & {\mathcal H}(G,\lambda_{\eta}){\rm -Mod}
}
\]
where $(t_Q)_{\ast}$ is an adjoint of the restriction functor $t_Q^{\ast} : {\mathcal H}(G,\lambda_{\eta}){\rm -Mod} \rightarrow {\mathcal H}(T,\eta){\rm -Mod}$.
 \end{enumerate}

\subsection{Intertwining Operators}
\label{sec-intertwining}

We write $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})$ to denote the induced space $\mathcal{F}_B  (\widetilde{\eta} \otimes \chi_s)$.
As $\lambda_{\eta}$ is one-dimensional, it is straightforward from \cite[(2.13)]{BK98} that there is a natural isomorphism $V_{\lambda_{\eta}} \simeq V_{\lambda_{\eta}} \otimes_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{C}_{\lambda_{\eta}} \simeq V^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ given by $\phi \otimes w \mapsto \phi(w)$.
For $w \in W$, the functions $f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}$ and $f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}}$  in $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ are given by
\[
  f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}(w)(g)=
  \begin{cases}
  \widetilde{\eta}\chi_s\delta^{1/2}(b) \lambda_{\eta}(j) & \text{if} \quad g=bj \in BJ_{\eta} \\
  0 & \text{otherwise,}
  \end{cases}
\]
and
\[
  f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}}(w)(g)=
  \begin{cases}
 \widetilde{\eta}\chi_s\delta^{1/2}(b) \lambda_{\eta}(j) & \text{if} \quad g=b{\rm w}_0j \in B{\rm w}_0J_{\eta} \\
  0 & \text{otherwise.}
  \end{cases}
\]
For ${\rm w} \in {\rm \bf W}$, let $T_{\rm w} \in \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$ denote the function supported on the double coset $J_{\eta}{\rm w}J_{\eta}$
and given by the formula $T_{\rm w}(h{\rm w}k)=\check{\lambda}(h)\check{\lambda}(k)$, $h,k \in J_{\eta}$.
Let $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$ be the subalgebra in $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$ spanned by the function $T_{\rm w}$ for ${\rm w} \in {\rm \bf W}$.
Since any element ${\rm w}$ in ${\rm \bf W}$ certainly intertwines the representation $\lambda_{\eta}$,  \cite[Lemma 2.3]{Kut04} (cf. \cite[(11.6)]{BK98}) implies that
$J_{\eta}{\rm \bf W}J_{\eta}=J_{\eta}KJ_{\eta}$ (cf. \cite[(5.1)]{MP21}).
We summarize the properties of $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$ from \cite[\S 11.5 and \S 11.6]{BK98}.
\begin{lemma}
\label{BK-basis}
The set $\{T_{1_2},T_{{\rm w}_0} \}$ is a $\mathbb{C}$-basis of $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$.
In particular, $\dim_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta}))=2$.
\end{lemma}

We observe that
\[
 \{ g \in G \,|\, \text{There is $f \in \mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ with $f(g) \neq 0$} \}
 \]
is a subset of $BGJ_{\eta}=BKJ_{\eta}$. Hence, any $f \in \mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$  is determined by its restriction to $K$.
In this regard, we define
\begin{equation}
\label{compactisom}
\iota : {\rm Hom}_{J_{\eta}}(W,\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})) \rightarrow \mathcal{H}(K,\check{\lambda}_{\eta})
\end{equation}
by
$  \iota (\phi)(k)(w)=\phi(w)(k)$ for  $\phi \in {\rm Hom}_{J_{\eta}}(\mathbb{C}_{\lambda_{\eta}},\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})), k \in J_{\eta}KJ_{\eta}$, and $w \in \mathbb{C}_{\lambda_{\eta}}$.

\begin{lemma}$(${\rm cf.} \cite[Lemma 3.2.6]{Kim16}$)$
The map $\iota$ is well defined and is a $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$-module homomorphism.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $j,j' \in J_{\eta}$ and ${\rm w} \in {\rm \bf W}$. Thanks to \ref{Iwahori}, we decompose $j=j_Uj_Tj_{\overline{U}}$ with $j_U \in J_{\eta} \cap U$, $j_T \in J_{\eta} \cap T$, and $j_{\overline{U}} \in J_{\eta} \cap \overline{U}$. We see that elements ${\rm w}^{-1}j_{\overline{U}}{\rm w}j'$ intertwine the character $\lambda_{\eta}$
and the right translation $R$. With these in hand, we have
\begin{multline*}
 \iota(\phi)(j{\rm w}j')(w)=\lambda_{\eta}(j_T)  \phi(w)(j_{\overline{U}}{\rm w}j')=\lambda_{\eta}(j_T)(R({\rm w}^{-1}j_{\overline{U}}{\rm w}j')\phi)(w)({\rm w})\\
 =\lambda_{\eta}(j_T)\phi(\lambda_{\eta}({\rm w}^{-1}j_{\overline{U}}{\rm w}j')w)({\rm w}).
\end{multline*}
Appealing to \ref{kernel}, $\lambda_{\eta}({\rm w}^{-1}j_{\overline{U}}{\rm w})$ is trivial, and it becomes
\[
 \iota(\phi)(w)(j{\rm w}j')=\lambda_{\eta}(j_T)\phi(\lambda_{\eta}(j')w)({\rm w})=\lambda_{\eta}(j_T) \iota(\phi)({\rm w})\lambda_{\eta}(j')(w)
 =\lambda_{\eta}(j) \iota(\phi)({\rm w})\lambda_{\eta}(j')(w)
\]
having used the fact that $\lambda_{\eta}(j_T)=\lambda_{\eta}(j)$. We confirm that $\iota$ is well defined, that is to say, $\iota (\phi)$ belongs to $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$.

\par
It remains to show that $\iota$ is a $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$-module homomorphism. To this end, for $f \in \mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$,
$\iota(  \pi(f)\phi)(k)(w)$ equals to
\begin{multline*}
 ( \pi(f)\phi)(w)(k)=\int_G \pi(g)\phi(f(g)^{\vee}w)(k) \,dg=\int_G \phi(f(g)^{\vee}w)(kg) \,dg
 \\
 =\int_G \phi(\check{f}(g^{-1})w)(kg) \,dg
 =\int_G \iota(\phi)(kg)\check{f}(g^{-1})(w)
 =(\iota( \phi) \star \check{f}) (k)(w)
 \end{multline*}
from which the desired result follows.
\end{proof}

The following Proposition can be thought of as
the ${\rm SL}_2(F)$-analogue of \cite[Lemma 3.2.9]{Kim16} (cf. \cite[Proposition 5.9]{JK21}).

\begin{proposition}
\label{two-dim}
As $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$-modules, $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$  is isomorphic to $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})_{\lambda_{\eta}}$.
Consequently, the $\lambda_{\eta}$-isotypic subspace $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ is two dimensional with a $\mathbb{C}$-basis $\{  f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}, f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}} \}$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
To verify that \eqref{compactisom} is an isomorphism, it is sufficient to check that it takes a basis of $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$
to a basis of $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})_{\lambda_{\eta}}$. This is immediate from Lemma \ref{BK-basis}, since
$\iota( f_{{\rm w},\widetilde{\eta}})=T_{\rm w} $ for $\rm w \in {\rm \bf W}$.
\end{proof}

Since $U,\overline{U} \cong F$, we may identify the measure on $U$ and $\overline{U}$ with the additive measure $dx$ on $F$,
and we take $d^{\times} x$ to be $dx / |x|$ on $F^{\times}$. The Haar measure $dx$ is normalized so that $J_{\eta} \cap U \cong \mathfrak{o}$
has volume one. We define a standard $G$-intertwining operator $A(s,\chi) : \mathcal{F}(s,\chi) \rightarrow \mathcal{F}(-s,\chi^{-1})
$ by
\[
   A(s,\chi)(f)(g)=\int_{U} f({\rm w}_0 ug) \, du,
\]
for all $f \in  \mathcal{F}(s,\chi)$. The integral converges absolutely for ${\rm Re}(s) \gg 0$ and defines
a rational function on a non-empty Zariski open subset of the complex torus $X(T)$.
The character $\chi$ is said to be {\it regular} if $\chi \neq \chi^{-1}$. Since $\chi$ is regular,
every $G$-morphism from $\mathcal{F}(s,\chi)$ to $\mathcal{F}(-s,\chi^{-1})$
is a scalar multiple of $ A(s,\chi)$.
Our calculation is inspired from the idea in \cite{JK21}.

\begin{proposition}
\label{intertwining}
Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ such that $\eta^2=1$.
Let $\widetilde{\eta}$ be any extension of $\eta$.
We assume that $\chi_s$ is regular so that $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})$ and $\mathcal{F}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})$ are all irreducible. Then we have
\[
 A(s,\widetilde{\eta})(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)q^{-n_{\eta}}f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}
\]
and
\[
 A(s,\widetilde{\eta})(f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(U \cap J_{\eta})f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}
 =\widetilde{\eta}(-1)f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Since $\mathfrak{R}^{\mathfrak{s}_{\eta}}(G)$ is equivalent to $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$-module, we have
\[
  {\rm Hom}_{G}(\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta}), \mathcal{F}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}))
  \simeq {\rm Hom}_{\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})}(\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})_{\lambda_{\eta}}, \mathcal{F}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})_{\lambda_{\eta}}).
\]
Therefore, $A(s,\widetilde{\eta})$ induces an intertwining map $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})_{\lambda_{\eta}} \rightarrow \mathcal{F}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})_{\lambda_{\eta}}$, which we by abuse of notation we will again denote by $A(s,\widetilde{\eta})$. It follows from Proposition \ref{two-dim} that $A(s,\widetilde{\eta})(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})=a_1f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}+a_{{\rm w}}f_{{\rm w_0},\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}$.
We may evaluate both sides of this equation at ${\rm w}_0$ to obtain
\[
 a_{{\rm w}}=\int_{U} f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}({\rm w}_0 u{\rm w}_0) \, du
 =\widetilde{\eta}(-1)\int_{\overline{U}} f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}(\overline{u}) \, d\overline{u}
=\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta}).
\]
For $x \neq 0$, we have the Iwasawa decomposition:
\begin{equation}
\label{Iwasawa}
  {\rm w}_0u(x)=\begin{pmatrix} x^{-1} & 0 \\ 0 & x \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -x \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ x^{-1}& 1 \end{pmatrix}.
\end{equation}
In particular, for $x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}$, we have $f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}({\rm w}_0u(x))=\widetilde{\eta}\chi_s\delta^{1/2}(x^{-1})$.
We may rewrite $x \in F^{\times}$ as $x=\varpi^ky$ with $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $y \in \mathfrak{o}^{\times}$, and then use the relation of additive Haar measure $d(ax)=|a|dx$ for $a \in F^{\times}$ to determine $a_1$:
\begin{multline*}
 a_1=\int_{U} f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}({\rm w}_0 u) \, du
 =\int_{\{x: x\neq 0,\; x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}\}} \widetilde{\eta}(x^{-1})|x|^{-s-1} \,dx\\
 =\int_{|x| \geq q^{n_{\eta}}} \widetilde{\eta}(x^{-1})|x|^{-s-1} \,dx
 =\sum_{n=-\infty}^{-n_{\eta}} \eta(\varpi^{-n})|\varpi^{-n}|^{-s}\int_{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}\widetilde{\eta}(x) \,d^{\times}x.
\end{multline*}
 But $\widetilde{\eta}$ being ramified implies that the series of equality of above integrals is zero. In other words, $a_1=0$.
\end{proof}

The {\it Plancherel constant} is a scalar valued function $\mu(s,\widetilde{\eta}) \in \mathbb{C}$ attached to $\eta$ is by the defining relation
\[
 A(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}) \circ A(s,\widetilde{\eta})=\mu(s,\widetilde{\eta})^{-1}
\]
on a Zariski open dense subset of $\mathbb{C}$. It is a rational function in $q^{-s}$ and clearly depends on the measure defining intertwining operators.

\begin{theorem}[The Plancherel Constant I]
\label{Plancherel}
Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) unitary character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ satisfying $\eta^2=1$.
Let $\widetilde{\eta}$ be any extension of $\eta$.
Then we have
\[
  \mu(s,\widetilde{\eta})={\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})^{-1}{\rm vol}(U \cap J_{\eta})^{-1}=q^{n_{\eta}}.
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We apply Proposition \ref{intertwining} twice.
\end{proof}

The Plancherel constant in Theorem \ref{Plancherel} coincides with that in split cases \cite[\S 3.3]{KK} on the common Zariski open dense subset of $\mathbb{C}$ (refer to \cite[Theorem 4.5]{KM09} for the precise description), and
this recovers the work of Kutzko and Morris \cite[Theorem 4.5.(2)-(ii)]{KM09}.

\section{The Whittaker Model and Local Coefficient for {\rm SL}(2)}
\label{sec3-Whittaker}

\subsection{The local coefficient}
\label{SL2-LC}

Let $\psi$ be a non-trivial additive character of $F$ trivial on $\mathfrak{o}$ but not on $\mathfrak{p}^{-1}$, and $\chi$ a character of $F^{\times}$.
It is a theorem of Rodier \cite{Rod72} that the dimension of the space of $\psi$-Whittaker functionals $\Omega_s$ on $\mathcal{F}(s,\chi)$
is one. We may define a basis vector for of $\psi$-Whittaker functionals $\Omega_s$ on $\mathcal{F}(s,\chi)$  by the formula
\[
  \Omega_s(f)=\int_{U} f({\rm w}_0 u) \psi^{-1}(u) \,du.
\]
This integral may not converge for all $f$ but can be extended to the whole space as a principal value integral.
We also have the following convenient reinterpretation for $\Omega_s$ as a principal value integral; Given a compact open subgroup
$K_{\ast}$ of $G$, there exists a suitably large compact open subgroup $U_{\ast} \subset U$ such that
\[
 \Omega_s(f)=\int_{U_{\ast}} f({\rm w}_0 u) \psi^{-1}(u) \,du
\]
for all $s$ and for all $f \in \mathcal{F}(s,\chi)^{K_{\ast}}$. We similarly define $\Omega'_s$ on  $\mathcal{F}(s,\chi^{-1})$
via
\[
  \Omega'_s(f)=\int_{U} f({\rm w}_0 u) \psi^{-1}(u) \,du
\]
as a principal value integral in the above sense. Appealing to the aforementioned result of Rodier \cite{Rod72}, there exists a non-zero constant $C_{\psi}(s,\chi)$
called the {\it Langlnads-Shahidi local coefficient} \cite{Sha78,Sha81,Sha84,Sha90} satisfying
\[
 C_{\psi}(s,\chi)( \Omega'_s \circ A(s,\chi))= \Omega_s.
\]
For $c \in F$, the {\it Gauss sum} attached to $\chi$ is defined by
\[
  \tau(\chi,\psi,c)=\int_{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}} \chi(x^{-1}) \overline{\psi(cx)} \, dx.
\]

\begin{theorem}[The Local Coefficient]
\label{LocalCoefficient}
Suppose that $\psi$ is a fixed additive character of level $0$. Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ satisfying
$\eta^2=1$ with level $n_{\eta}$. Let $\widetilde{\eta}$ be any extension of $\eta$.
Then we have
\[
  C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta})=\widetilde{\eta}(-\varpi^{n_{\eta}})\tau(\eta,\psi,\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})q^{-n_{\eta}(s-1)}.
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} Since $C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta})$ is a rational function in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s})$, it suffices to prove the assertion on a Zariski open dense subset of $X(T)$.
In particular, we impose the assumption that $\chi_s$ is regular so that $\mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta})$ and $\mathcal{F}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})$ are all irreducible.
Essentially, we outline the proof in \cite[Proposition 3.1]{KK}. Evaluating one side is straightforward, since the function $f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}}$ is supported on $B{\rm w}_0J_{\eta}$.
Namely,
\begin{multline*}
 ( \Omega'_s \circ A(s,\widetilde{\eta})(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})\Omega'_s(f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}) \\
 =\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})\int_{J_{\eta} \cap U} f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1}}({\rm w}_0 u) \psi^{-1}(u) \,du
  =\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})\int_{J_{\eta} \cap U}  \psi^{-1}(u) \,du.
\end{multline*}
We see that $\psi$ is trivial on $J_{\eta} \cap U$, and consequently,
\begin{equation}
\label{Side}
 ( \Omega'_s \circ A(s,\widetilde{\eta})(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1){\rm vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta}){\rm vol}(U \cap J_{\eta})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)q^{-n_{\eta}}.
 \end{equation}
 This brings us to the central issue of computing the other side $\Omega_s(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})$. In contrast to  $f_{{\rm w}_0,\widetilde{\eta}}$,
 this is not immediate, because $f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}$ is supported near the identity element.
 To this end, we deduce from \eqref{Iwasawa} that $f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}}({\rm w}_0u(x))$ is $\widetilde{\eta}\chi_s\delta^{1/2}(x^{-1})$, if $x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}$, and $0$, otherwise. Then $\Omega_s(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})$ equals to
 \[
  \int_{\{ \mathfrak{p}^{-m}-\{0\} \} \cap \{ x\,|\, x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}\}} \widetilde{\eta}(x^{-1}) |x|^{-s-1} \psi^{-1}(x) \,dx
 \]
 for some large positive integer $m \gg 0$. For convenience, let $\mathcal{D}$ denote $\{ \mathfrak{p}^{-m}-\{0\} \} \cap \{ x\,|\, x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}} \}$.
 For any integer $r$, let $\mathcal{D}_r$ denote the {\it shell},
$   \{ x \in \varpi^r\mathfrak{o}^{\times} \,|\, x \in \mathfrak{p}^{-m}-\{0\}, x^{-1} \in \mathfrak{p}^{n_{\eta}}  \}$.
Then our domain of the integration can be decomposed as  shells $\mathcal{D}=\cup_{-m \leq r \leq -n_{\eta}} \mathcal{D}_r$.
The crux of the proof of \cite[Proposition 3.1]{KK} is that the last shell $\mathcal{D}_{-n_{\eta}}$ is expressed as $\varpi^{-n_{\eta}}\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ which only contributes $\Omega_s(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})$. Assembling all of this information, we obtain
\begin{multline}
\label{DualSide}
 \Omega_s(f_{1_2,\widetilde{\eta}})=\int_{\varpi^{-n_{\eta}}\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}  \widetilde{\eta}(x^{-1}) |x|^{-s} \psi^{-1}(x) \,d^{\times}x
 =\widetilde{\eta}(\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})q^{-n_{\eta}s} \int_{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}} \eta(x^{-1}) \psi^{-1}(\varpi^{-n_{\eta}} x) d^{\times} x \\
 =\widetilde{\eta}(\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})q^{-n_{\eta}s}\tau(\eta,\psi,\varpi^{-n_{\eta}}).
\end{multline}
We can draw the conclusion from \eqref{Side} aligned with \eqref{DualSide}.
\end{proof}

This result should be compared with the work of Shahidi \cite[Lemma 4.4]{Sha78}. In addition, the local coefficient coincides with the corresponding Hecke-Tate local $\gamma$-factor \cite{Tat77},
which can be viewed as Bump and Friedberg exterior square local factors for ${\rm GL}_1(F) \cong F^{\times}$ (cf. \cite[Proof of Theorem 5.4]{Mat15}). Indeed, Theorem \ref{LocalCoefficient} confirms Conjecture 4 in \cite{BF89}.
The local coefficient has a great influence on the development of modern number theory, and is closed related to the theory of local factors {\it \`{a} la} {\it the Langlands-Shahidi method} \cite{Lom09,Lom15,Lom16,Lom17,Sha78,Sha81,Sha84,Sha90}.

\par
Let $P(X) \in \mathbb{C}[X]$ be the unique polynomial satisfying $P(0)=1$ such that $P(q^{-s})$ is the numerator of $C_{\psi}(s,\chi)$.
Whenever $\chi$ is unitary, the local $L$-factor is defined by
\[
  L(s,\chi):=\frac{1}{P(q^{-s})}.
\]
The local  $\varepsilon$-factor is defined to satisfy the relation:
\[
  C_{\psi}(s,\chi)=\varepsilon(s,\chi,\psi)\frac{L(1-s,\chi^{-1})}{L(s,\chi)}.
\]

\begin{corollary}[Local Factors] Keeping notations and the hypothesis of Theorem \ref{LocalCoefficient}, we have
\[
  \varepsilon(s,\widetilde{\eta},\psi)= C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta}) \quad \text{and} \quad  L(s,\widetilde{\eta})=1.
\]
\end{corollary}

Corollaries \ref{FE} and \ref{SquareRoot} match with the corresponding formul\ae{} \cite[\S Introduction]{Sha84} and \cite[Proposition 3.1.1]{Sha81}.

\begin{corollary}[The Functional Equation]
\label{FE}
Keeping notations and the hypothesis of Theorem \ref{LocalCoefficient}, we have
\[
 C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta})C_{\psi}(1-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})=\widetilde{\eta}(-1).
 \]
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
The functional equation for the local constant $ \varepsilon(s,\widetilde{\eta},\psi)$ (cf. \cite[Corollary 23.4.2]{BH06}) gives rise to
\[
C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta})C_{\psi}(1-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})
=\varepsilon(1/2,\widetilde{\eta},\psi)\varepsilon(1/2,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1},\psi)=\widetilde{\eta}(-1).
\qedhere \]
\end{proof}

The local coefficient is related to the Plancherel constant which is more or less saying that ``the square root of the local coefficient equals the associated Plancherel constant" as given in Corollary \ref{SquareRoot}.

\begin{corollary} [The Plancherel Constant II]
\label{SquareRoot}
We retain notations and the hypothesis of Theorem \ref{LocalCoefficient}. We further assume that $\widetilde{\eta}$ is unitary. Then we have
\[
  \mu(s,\widetilde{\eta})=C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta}) C_{\psi^{-1}}(-s,\widetilde{\eta}^{-1})=|C_{\psi}(s,\widetilde{\eta}) |^2.
\]
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof} We observe from \cite[(23.6.3)]{BH06} that
\[
\tau(\eta,\psi,\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})\tau(\eta^{-1},\psi^{-1},\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})=|\tau(\eta,\psi,\varpi^{-n_{\eta}})|^2=q^{-n_{\eta}}.
\qedhere \]
\end{proof}

We conclude this section with reviewing the Langlands-Shahidi method to the exterior square $\gamma$-factor in a more general context, which we use later in \S \ref{exterior-square}.
Let ${\bf G}={\rm Sp}_{2n}(F)$ be a symplectic group over $F$ in $2n$ variables. The group ${\bf M} \cong {\rm GL}_{n}(F)$ can be embedded as a Levi component of
a maximal Seigel parabolic subgroup ${\bf P}={\bf M}{\bf N}$ with an unipotent radical ${\bf N}$. Let ${\bf B}={\bf T}{\bf U}$ denote the $F$-points
of the standard Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices with
 with maximal torus ${\bf T}$ and unipotent radical ${\bf U}$. By abuse of notation, a character $\psi : {\bf U} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$
 can be defined through $\psi$ in \S \ref{SL2-LC} in a canonical way. We write $\iota^{\bf G}_{\bf P}(\cdot)$ to denote the normalized parabolic induction functor.
For $s \in \mathbb{C}$ and $g \in  {\rm GL}_{n}(F)$, let $\chi_s$ denote the unramified character $\chi_s(g)=|{\rm det} (g)|^s$.
For an irreducible generic representation $\pi$ of ${\rm GL}_{n}(F) \cong {\bf M}$, we let $\iota(s,\pi):=\iota^{\bf G}_{\bf P}(\pi\otimes \chi_s)$.
and we denote $V(s,\pi)$ denote the space of the unitarily induced representation $\iota(s,\pi)$.
We hope the standard use of $\pi$ for the representation of ${\rm GL}_{n}(F)$ (\S \ref{exterior-square}) and our use of $\pi$ for the natural left $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda)$-${\rm Mod}$ structure on $V_{\lambda}$ (\S \ref{TC}, \S \ref{sec-intertwining}, \S \ref{GGrep}) will not cause confusion. The distinction should be clear from context. Let
\[
  {\rm w}_0=\begin{pmatrix}  &-1_n \\ 1_n& \end{pmatrix}.
\]
We let ${\rm w}_0(\pi)$ denote the representation of ${\bf M}$ given by $\pi({\rm w}_0m{\rm w}^{-1}_0)$, $m \in {\bf M}$.
The standard intertwining operator $A(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)$ between $V(s,\pi)$ and $V(-s,{\rm w}_0(\pi))$ is then defined by
\[
  A(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0) f(g)=\int_{\bf N}\, f({\rm w_0}ng)\, dn,
\]
where $f \in V(s,\pi)$. It converges for $\mathrm{Re}(s)$ large enough and extends to a rational operator on $q^{-s}$. If $\Omega^{\bf M}$ is a Whittaker functional for $\pi$,
then $\iota(s,\pi)$ is $\psi$-generic for the Whittaker functional $\Omega$ given by
\[
  \Omega(s,\pi)(f)=\int_{\bf N}\, \Omega^{\bf M}(f({\rm w}_0n))\overline{ \psi} (n) \, dn,
\]
where $f \in V(s,\pi)$. The integral converges as a principal value integral over compact open subgroup of $\bf N$ and it is a non-zero Laurent polynomial function on $q^{-s}$ (cf. \cite[Theorem 1.4]{Lom09}). Appealing to Rodier's multiplicity-one theorem \cite{Rod72}, the {\it Langlnads-Shahidi local coefficient} is given by
\[
 C_{\psi}(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)(\Omega(-s,{\rm w}_0(\pi)) \circ A(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0))=\Omega(s,\pi).
\]
Let $\gamma(s,\pi,\psi)$ denote a Godement-Jacquet $\gamma$-factor \cite{GJ72}. The {\it Langlands-Shahidi exterior square $\gamma$-factor} $\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$
is a rational function in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s})$, which is defined by (cf. \cite[\S 2.2]{Lom15})
\[
  C_{\psi}(s,\pi,{\rm w}_0)=\gamma(s,\pi,\psi)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]

\subsection{The Gelfand-Graev representation}
\label{GGrep}

We turn our attention to the case $G={\rm SL}_2(F)\cong{\rm Sp}_2(F)$ as in \S \ref{TC}.
The Gelfand-Graev representation ${\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi}$ \cite[\S 4.1]{CS18}  is provided by the space of smooth functions $f : G \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$
which are compactly supported modulo $U$. They also satisfy
\begin{equation}
\label{Whittaker-invariance}
 f(ug)=\psi(u)f(g) \quad \text{for all $u \in U$ and $g \in G$.}
\end{equation}
Let ${\text {\rm Ind}}_U^G{\psi}$ denote the full space of smooth functions $f : G \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ which satisfy \eqref{Whittaker-invariance}.
As a potential application, the contragredient $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G\,{\overline{\psi}})^{\vee} \cong {\text {\rm Ind}}_U^G{\psi}$ of ${\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G\,{\overline{\psi}}$
appears in the target space of the {\it Whittaker map} $\omega_s : \mathcal{F}(s,\widetilde{\eta}) \rightarrow {\text {\rm Ind}}_U^G{\psi}$
corresponding to $\Omega_s$ via Frobenius reciprocity.
We take this occasion to explore the structure of the Gelfand-Graev space in ${\rm SL}_2(F)$-cases, which extends the result of \cite{CS18} and \cite{MP21}.
For $w \in W$, we define the functions $\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}$ and $\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}:G \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ in the $\lambda_{\eta}$-co-invariant Gelfand-Graev space $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ given by
\[
  \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(w)(g)=
  \begin{cases}
 \psi(u)\lambda_{\eta}(j)  \ & \text{if} \quad g=uj \in U \cap J_{\eta} \\
  0 & \text{otherwise,}
  \end{cases}
\]
and
\[
  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(w)(g)=
  \begin{cases}
\psi(u)\lambda_{\eta}(j) & \text{if} \quad g=u{\rm w}_0j \in U {\rm w}_0 J_{\eta}\\
  0 & \text{otherwise.}
  \end{cases}
\]
According to \cite[Lemma 10.3]{BK98} (cf.\cite[Proposition 4.2]{CS18}), the map from ${\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi}$ to
${\text {\rm c-ind}}_1^T{\mathbb{C}} \cong C_c^{\infty}(T)$ defined by
\[
 \Psi: f \mapsto f_{\overline{U}}(t)=\delta^{1/2}(t) \int_{\overline{U}} f(\overline{u}t)\, d\overline{u}, \quad t \in T
\]
descends to an isomorphism  $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_{U}^G{\psi})_{\overline{U}}$ and $C_c^{\infty}(T)$.
Let ${\rm ch}^{\eta}_{(T \cap J_{\eta})} \in (C_c^{\infty}(T))^{\eta}$ be a test function supported on $T \cap J_{\eta}$ such that ${\rm ch}^{\eta}_{(T \cap J_{\eta})}(t)=\mathrm{Vol}(\overline{U} \cap J_{\eta})  \eta(t)$ for all $t \in T \cap J_{\eta}$.
Owing to \cite[Theorem 1]{MP21} (cf. \cite[The discussion preceding Lemma 4.3]{CS18}),
$\Psi$ in turn endows ${\mathcal H}(T,\eta)$-module isomorphisms from $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$
to $(C_c^{\infty}(T))^{\eta} \cong {\mathcal H}(T,\eta)$ of which ${\rm ch}^{\eta}_{(T \cap J_{\eta})}$ is a generator.

\begin{proposition}
\label{Whittaker-Hecke}
Suppose that $\psi$ is a fixed additive character of level $0$. Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ satisfying
$\eta^2=1$ with level $n_{\eta}$. We set $\epsilon=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)$. Then we have
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\arabic*})$]
 \item\label{cpt} $ T_{\rm w} \star ( \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})=\epsilon^{\ell({\rm w})}(\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})$ for ${\rm w} \in {\rm \bf W}$.
 \item\label{abel} $\Psi( \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta})={\rm ch}^{\eta}_{(T \cap J_{\eta})}$ and $\Psi( \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})=0$.
  \end{enumerate}
  Consequently, $({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}}$ is a free ${\mathcal H}(T,\eta)$-module generated by $\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The function $T_{1_2} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}$  is supported on $U   J_{\eta} J_{\eta} \subset U  J_{\eta}$.
Let us evaluate at $1_2$;
\begin{multline*}
( \pi(T_{1_2})  \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta})(w)(1_2)
=\int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(\check{T}_{1_2}(x^{-1})w) (x) \, dx\\
=\int_{J_{\eta}} \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(\check{T}_{1_2}(j^{-1})w) (j) \, dj
=\int_{J_{\eta}} \lambda(j^{-1})\lambda(j)\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(w)(1_2) \, dj
={\rm vol}(J_{\eta})\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(w)(1_2)=1.
\end{multline*}
We conclude that  $T_{1_2} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}=\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}$.
In a similar manner, the function $T_{1_2} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$ is supported on $UJ_{\eta}(J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0J_{\eta}) \subset U {\rm w}_0 J_{\eta}$. Plugging in ${\rm w}_0$ yields
\begin{multline*}
( \pi(T_{1_2})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0)
=\int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{1_2}(x^{-1})w) ({\rm w}_0x) \, dx\\
=\int_{J_{\eta}} \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{1_2}(j^{-1})w) ({\rm w}_0j) \, dj
=\int_{J_{\eta}}  \lambda(j^{-1})\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(w)({\rm w}_0j) \, dj
={\rm vol}(J_{\eta}  )\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(w)({\rm w}_0)=1,
\end{multline*}
which implies that  $T_{1_2} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}=\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$.

\par
We turn to the effect of inter-twiners $T_{{\rm w}_0}$ on the generator $\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$. Taking into account the support, it is sufficient to specialize the values at $1_2$ and ${\rm w}_0$.
We first treat off-diagonal terms.
We make the change of variables $x \mapsto {\rm w}_0^{-1}x$ and then $x \mapsto x^{-1}$ to deduce
\begin{multline*}
 ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0)
 =\int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}(x^{-1})w) ({\rm w}_0x) \, dx
 =\int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}(x^{-1}{\rm w}_0)w) (x) \, dx \\
 =\int_{J_{\eta}} \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}(j{\rm w}_0)w) (j^{-1}) \, dj
 ={\rm vol}(J_{\eta}  ) \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}(w)(1_2)=1.
\end{multline*}
We now use the relation ${\rm w}_0^2=-1$. Then the support of $ \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$ forces that
\begin{multline*}
 ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)(1_2) \\
= \int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}(x^{-1})w) (x) \, dx
 =\int_{J_{\eta}  }\int_{J_{\eta} }\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}({j'}^{-1}{\rm w}^{-1}_0j^{-1})w) (j{\rm w}_0j') \, dj dj'  \\
 =\widetilde{\eta}(-1)\int_{J_{\eta} }\int_{J_{\eta} }\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}({j'}^{-1}{\rm w}_0j^{-1})w) (j{\rm w}_0j') \, dj dj'
= \epsilon {\rm vol}(U \cap J_{\eta}){\rm vol}(J_{\eta}  )\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(w)({\rm w}_0)=\epsilon.
\end{multline*}
In this circumstance, we can see that the sign change occurs.
On the other hand, the diagonal term $(T_{{\rm w}_0} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta})(1_2)$ is $0$,
as supports $J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0J_{\eta}$ and $UJ_{\eta}$ of  $T_{{\rm w}_0}$ and  $\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}$, respectively, are disjoint.
For another diagonal term  $  ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0) $, we use the fact that the integrand below is supported on $J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0J_{\eta}$
and is right invariant under $J_{\eta}$ coupled with the fact that
the map $j \mapsto j{\rm w}_0$ induces a bijection $J_{\eta} \slash (J_{\eta} \cap {\rm w}_0J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0^{-1}) \rightarrow J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0J_{\eta} \slash J_{\eta}$ (cf. \cite[Lemma 3.2]{Kut04}) to see that
 \begin{multline*}
  ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0)\\
=\int_{G} \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}(x^{-1})w) ({\rm w}_0x) \, dx
=[J_{\eta}: J_{\eta} \cap {\rm w}_0J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0^{-1}] \int_{J_{\eta}} \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}(\check{T}_{{\rm w}_0}({\rm w}_0^{-1}j^{-1})w) ({\rm w}_0j{\rm w}_0) \, dj.
\end{multline*}
The integrand of the last integral is right invariant under $J_{\eta} \cap \overline{B}$. In this way, we find that
\[
 ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0)=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)[J_{\eta}: J_{\eta} \cap {\rm w}_0J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0^{-1}]  \int_{J_{\eta} \cap U}
  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta} ({\rm w}_0u{\rm w}_0)(w)\,du.
\]
The integrand is $0$, unless $x \notin \mathfrak{o}^{\times}$. Then for $x \in \mathfrak{o}^{\times}$, we apply the Bruhat decomposition (cf. \cite[P. 606]{Kut04});
\[
  \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ x & 1 \end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix} x^{-1} & 0 \\ 0 & x \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}
  {\rm w}_0 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x^{-1} \\ 0& 1\end{pmatrix},
\]
whence $\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta} \left({\rm w}_0 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}{\rm w}_0 \right)=\eta(-x^{-1})\psi(-x)$.
Therefore it  can be expressed in terms of Gauss sums attached to the ramified character $\widetilde{\eta}$ and then eventually this term vanishes
\[
 ( \pi(T_{{\rm w}_0})  \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta})(w)({\rm w}_0)=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)[J_{\eta}: J_{\eta} \cap {\rm w}_0J_{\eta}{\rm w}_0^{-1}] \int_{\mathfrak{o}^{\times}}\eta(x^{-1})\psi(x) \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta} (w)({\rm w}_0)dx   =0,
\]
as was to be shown. Altogether, we obtain
\[
T_{{\rm w}_0} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}=\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}=\epsilon^2\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta} \quad \text{and} \quad T_{{\rm w}_0} \star \varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}=\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}.
\]
\par
The second assertion is immediate from Claim in the proof of \cite[Lemma 4.1]{CS18}.
\end{proof}

Let $\epsilon$-$sgn$ denote the one-dimensional representation of $\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})$ on $\mathbb{C}_{\epsilon}$ wherein $T_{\rm w}$ acts as $\epsilon^{\ell({\rm w})}$, ${\rm w} \in {\rm \bf W}$. Here $\ell$ denotes the length function on ${\rm \bf W}$. When $\epsilon=-1$, we simply write $(sgn,\mathbb{C}_{-1})$ for
$((-1)$-$sgn,\mathbb{C}_{-1})$.

\begin{theorem}
\label{Gelfand-Grev}
Suppose that $\psi$ is a fixed additive character of level $0$. Let $\eta$ be a non-trivial (ramified) character of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ satisfying
$\eta^2=1$ with level $n_{\eta}$. We set $\epsilon=\widetilde{\eta}(-1)$. As $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$-module isomorphisms, we have
\[
({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}} \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon}
 \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{-1}.
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
In virtue of Proposition \ref{Whittaker-Hecke}-\ref{cpt}, we construct an element in ${\rm Hom}_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}(\mathbb{C}_{\epsilon},({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}})$ given by $1 \mapsto \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$.
We have the following Frobenius reciprocity
\[
  {\rm Hom}_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}(\mathbb{C}_{\epsilon},({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}})
  \cong {\rm Hom}_{{\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})}}(\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}} \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon},({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}}),
\]
where the element $1 \mapsto \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$ corresponds to $T_{1_2} \otimes 1 \mapsto \varphi^{\psi}_{1_2,\eta}+\epsilon\varphi^{\psi}_{{\rm w}_0,\eta}$. The conclusion follows from Proposition \ref{Whittaker-Hecke}-\ref{abel}, since both $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon}$
and $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{-1}$ are free $\mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta})$-modules generated by $T_{1_2} \otimes 1$.
\end{proof}

When the characteristic of the field is $0$ and that of the residual field is $p > 3$, the above theorem has been settled by Mishra and  Pattanayak \cite[Theorem 3]{MP21}. To the best of our knowledge, Theorem \ref{Gelfand-Grev} is new for positive characteristics, or characteristic $0$ with $p=2,3$.

\begin{remark}
If $\eta^2 \neq 1$, then $t_Q$ in \ref{injection} becomes an isomorphism \cite[Corollary 3.1]{Kut04} in which case the cover $(J_{\eta},\lambda_{\eta})$ is said to
be a {\it split} cover. Then Proposition \ref{Whittaker-Hecke}-\ref{cpt} seems to be superfluous, because the map $t_Q$ already produce a series of ${\mathcal H}(T,\eta) \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} )$-module isomorphism
\[
 ({\text {\rm c-ind}}_U^G{\psi})^{\lambda_{\eta}} \cong \mathcal{H}(G,\lambda_{\eta} ) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon}
 \cong {\mathcal H}(T,\eta) \otimes_{{\mathcal{H}(K,\lambda_{\eta})}}  \mathbb{C}_{\epsilon} \cong {\mathcal H}(T,\eta) \cong (C_c^{\infty}(T))^{\eta}.
\]
\end{remark}

\section{The Local Exterior Square Gamma Factors for Level Zero Representations}
\label{exterior-square}

\subsection{Jacquet-Shalika integrals}
\label{Rankin-Selberg-JS}

Let $\tau$ be an irreducible cuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$.
A {\it level zero supercuspidal representation} $\pi$ of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ is given by
\[
 \pi \cong {\rm c\text{-}Ind}^{{\rm GL}_n(F)}_{F^{\times}{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o})} \widetilde{\lambda},
\]
where $\widetilde{\lambda}$ is a representation of $F^{\times}{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o})$ such that $\lambda:=\widetilde{\lambda}|_{{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o})}$
is an inflation of $\tau$ via the canonical projection
${\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}) \xrightarrow{ {\rm mod}\,\, \mathfrak{p}} {\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$. Let $\omega_{\pi}$ denote the central character of $Z_n(F) \cong F^{\times}$ the center of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$
such that $\omega_{\pi}|_{{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}) \cap F^{\times}}=\widetilde{\lambda}|_{{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}) \cap F^{\times}}$. In comparison with \S \ref{sec3-Whittaker},
we switch a level zero nontrivial additive character $\psi$ to a level one chacter that is trivial on $\mathfrak{p}$ but not on $\mathfrak{o}$.

\par
We briefly overview the theory of $\gamma$-factor \cite{Jo20}, using the formulation of Jacquet and Shalika \cite{JS88}. Let $\pi$ be a level
zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ with associated Whittaker models $\mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$.
We let $\mathcal{M}_{n}(F)$ be $n \times n$ matrices, $\mathcal{N}_n(F)$ the subspace of upper triangular matrices of $\mathcal{M}_{n}(F)$.
We denote by $U_n(F)$ the maximal unipotent subgroup of upper triangular unipotent matrices.
As before, we let $K_n={\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o})$ be the standard maximal compact subgroup of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$.
Let $\sigma_n$ be the permutation matrix given by
\[
 \sigma_{2m}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & \dotsm & m & | & m+1 & m+2 & \dotsm & 2m \\
                                                1 & 3 & \dotsm & 2m-1 & | &  2 & 4 & \dotsm &2m \\
                                                \end{pmatrix}
\]
when $n=2m$ is even, and by
\[
 \sigma_{2m+1}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & \dotsm & m & | & m+1 & m+2 & \dotsm & 2m & 2m+1 \\
                                                1 & 3 & \dotsm & 2m-1 & | &  2 & 4 & \dotsm &2m & 2m+1 \\
                                                \end{pmatrix}
\]
when $n=2m+1$ is odd. Let $\mathcal{S}(F^m)$ be the space of locally constant and compactly supported functions $\Phi : F^m \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$.
Let $\{ e_i \,|\, 1 \leq i \leq m\}$ be the standard row basis of $F^m$.
For each $W \in \mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$ and $\Phi \in \mathcal{S}(F^m)$, we define Jacquet-Shalika integrals $J(s,W,\Phi)$ by
\begin{multline*}
  \int_{U_m(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(F)}  \int_{\mathcal{N}_m(F) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(F)} \int_{F^m} W \left( \sigma_{2m+1} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m &X& \\ &1_m& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g && \\ &g& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m && \\ &1_m& \\ &z&1 \end{pmatrix} \right) \\
  \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X)  \Phi(z) |\mathrm{det}(g)|^{s-1}\, dz dX dg
\end{multline*}
in the odd case $n=2m+1$ and
\[
 \int_{U_m(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(F)} \int_{\mathcal{N}_m(F) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(F)} W \left( \sigma_{2m} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m & X \\ & 1_m  \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g \end{pmatrix} \right)  \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X) \Phi(e_mg) |\mathrm{det}(g)|^s \, dX dg
\]
in the even case $n=2m$. These integrals converge absolutely for ${\rm Re}(s) \gg 0$, and it defines a rational function in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s})$.
We define the Fourier transform on $\mathcal{S}(F^m)$ by
 \[
   \hat{\Phi}(y)=q^{-m/2}\int_{F^m} \Phi(x) \psi (x\,{^ty})\,dx
 \]
so that the measure on $F^m$ is the self-dual Haar measure. Then the Fourier inversion takes the form $\hat{\hat{\Phi}}(x)=\Phi(-x)$. Let
 \[
  {\rm w}_{\ell}:=\begin{pmatrix}  \vspace{-2ex} && 1 \\ & \iddots& \vspace{-2ex} \\ 1 && \end{pmatrix}
 \]
 denote the long Weyl element in ${\rm GL}_n(F)$.
 Let $\check{\pi}$ denote the contragredient representation of $\pi$. If $W \in \mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$, then $\check{W}(g):=W({\rm w}_{\ell} \prescript{t}{}{g}^{-1})$ belongs to $\mathcal{W}(\check{\pi},\psi^{-1})$.
The local exterior square $\gamma$-factor $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ is defined as a proportionality. The $\gamma$-factor is a rational function in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s})$
satisfying
\[
J(1-s,\check{\pi}(\tau_n)\check{W},\hat{\Phi})=\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)J(s,W,\Phi),
\]
where $\tau_n$ is the matrix $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} & 1_m \\ 1_m & \end{pmatrix}$ if $n=2m$, and the matrix $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} & 1_m & \\ 1_m && \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix}$
 if $n=2m+1$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{spherical-rep-JS}
Let $F$ be a local function field. Let $\pi$ be an irreducible subquotient of the unramified principal series representation ${\rm Ind}_{B_n(F)}^{{\rm GL}_n(F)}(\mu_1 \otimes \dotsm \otimes \mu_n )$,
where each $\mu_i$ is an unramified character of $F^{\times}$, that is to say, it is invariant under the maximal compact subgroup $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ of $F^{\times}$. Then we have
\[
 \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\prod_{1\leq j < k \leq n} \gamma(s,\mu_j \times \mu_k,\psi).
\]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let us set $\Xi={\rm Ind}_{B_n(F)}^{{\rm GL}_n(F)}(\mu_1 \otimes \dotsm \otimes \mu_n )$.
Let $V_{\pi}$ and $V_{\Xi}$ denote their underlying space of $\pi$ and $\Xi$, respectively.
By the uniqueness of Whittaker functionals,
a non-zero Whittaker functional on $V_{\pi}$ induces a non-zero Whittaker functional on $V_{\Xi}$. As this representation has a unique Whittaker functional,
this must be it and we may conclude that $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)=\gamma(s,\Xi,\wedge,\psi)$.
Now it is worthwhile to noting that a spherical representation of Whittaker types $\Xi$ (not necessarily irreducible) has a $K_n$-fixed vector. Furthermore, the subspace of $K_n$-fixed vectors must be one-dimensional. This $K_n$-fixed vector, which is unique up to scalar multiplication,
is called the {\it spherical vector} of $\pi$. For such a spherical representation $\pi$, we normalized the spherical Whittaker function $W^{\circ}$ in the Whittaker model $\mathcal{W}(\Xi,\psi)$
so that $W^{\circ}(1_n)=1$. Upon taking $W^{\circ} \in \mathcal{W}(\Xi,\psi)$ and $\Phi^{\circ} \in \mathcal{S}(F^{m})$ of a characteristic function on $\mathfrak{o}^m$ and using \cite[\S 2]{JS88}, we have the identity
\begin{multline*}
  \prod_{i=1}^n L(1-s,\mu^{-1}_i,\wedge^2)\prod_{1\leq j < k \leq n} L(1-s,\mu^{-1}_j \times \mu^{-1}_k)
  =J(1-s,\check{\pi}(\tau_n){\check{W}^{\circ}},\hat{\Phi}^{\circ})\\
  =\gamma(s,\Xi,\wedge^2,\psi)J(s,W^{\circ},\Phi^{\circ})=\gamma(s,\Xi,\wedge^2,\psi) \prod_{i=1}^n L(s,\mu_i,\wedge^2)\prod_{1\leq j < k \leq n} L(s,\mu_j \times \mu_k)
\end{multline*}
from which the result we seek for follows.
\end{proof}

We let $k$ denote a global function field with field of constant $\mathbb{F}_q$ and ring of ad\`{e}les $\mathbb{A}_k$.
We summarize the following standard globalization due to Lomel\'{i} \cite[Lemma 3.1 and Remark 3.2]{Lom17} (cf. \cite[Lemma 9.28]{AKMSS21}),
which is stemmed from the work of Henniart and Vign\'{e}ras \cite[Proposition 5.1]{Sha90}. The crux of the idea is to construct a function on $f=\otimes'_v f_v$ on ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_k)$ in such a way that the Poincar\'{e} series is a cuspidal automorphic function.

\begin{theorem}
\label{Lomeli-Globalization}
Let $\pi$ be a level zero unitary supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ over a local function field $F$.
There is a global field $k$ with a set of three places $S=\{ v_0,v_1,v_{\infty}\}$ such that $k_{v_0} \cong F$.
There exists an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi=\otimes'_v \Pi_v$ of ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_k)$ satisfying
the following properties:
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\roman*})$]
\item $\Pi_{v_0} \cong \pi$;
\item $\Pi_v$ is an irreducible unramified principal series representation at every $v \notin S$;
\item $\Pi_{v_1}$ and $\Pi_{v_{\infty}}$ are irreducible quotients of unramified principal series representations.
\item If $\pi$ is generic, then $\Pi$ is globally generic.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

The aforementioned globalization is required to prove a purely local statement, namely, that
local exterior square $\gamma$-factors $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ via Rankin-Selberg methods due to Jacquet and Shalika \cite{JS88}
agrees with those $\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$ via Langlands-Shahidi methods \cite{HL11} in positive characteristic at hand.
We eventually generalize the equality to characteristic zero in Theorem \ref{equal-zero-exterior}.

\begin{theorem}
\label{exter-positive}
Let $\pi$ be a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ over a local function field $F$. Then we have
\[
  \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Twisting by an unramified character does not affect the conclusion, so there is no harm to assume that $\pi$ is unitary (cf. \cite[\S 6.6-(vii)]{Lom16}).
We select a set $S=\{ v_0, v_1, v_{\infty} \}$ of three places as in Theorem \ref{Lomeli-Globalization}.
We take a non-trivial additive character $\Psi$ of $\mathbb{A}_k \slash k$, and assume, as we may, that $\Psi_{v_0}=\psi$.
Applying Theorem \ref{Lomeli-Globalization} to the irreducible level zero,
we obtain an irreducible unitary cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi$.
The global functional equation via the Langlands-Shahidi method can be read from \cite[\S4-(vi)]{HL11} as
\begin{equation}
\label{LS-global-exterior}
 L^{S}(s,\Pi,\wedge^2)=\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\Pi_{v_0},\wedge^2,\Psi_{v_0}) \prod_{v \in S-\{ v_0\}} \gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\Psi_v)  L^{S}(1-s,\check{\Pi},\wedge^2).
\end{equation}
Since for $v \notin S$ we know that $\Pi_v$ and $\psi_v$ are unramified so that $\varepsilon(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\psi_v) \equiv 1$,
\cite[Theorem 3.3]{Jo21} is rephrased as
\begin{equation}
\label{RS-global-exterior}
 L^{S}(s,\Pi,\wedge^2)=\gamma(s,\Pi_{v_0},\wedge^2,\Psi_{v_0}) \prod_{v \in S-\{ v_0\}} \gamma(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\Psi_v) L^{S}(1-s,\check{\Pi},\wedge^2).
\end{equation}
Applying Lemma \ref{spherical-rep-JS} gives us $\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\Psi_v)=\gamma(s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\Psi_v)$ for $v \in S-\{ v_0\}$.
In doing so, the result that we seek for is immediate, once we divide \eqref{LS-global-exterior} by \eqref{RS-global-exterior}.
\end{proof}

\subsection{Deligne-Kazhdan close field theory}
We turn our attention to Deligne-Kazhdan close local field theory. Two non-archimedean local fields $F$ and $F'$ are {\it m-close} if $\mathfrak{o}_F/\mathfrak{p}_F^m \cong \mathfrak{o}_{F'}/\mathfrak{p}_{F'}^m$. For example, the fields $\mathbb{F}_p((t))$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p(p^{1/m})$ are $m$-close. We follow the elaboration about Deligne's theory in \cite[\S 2.1]{Gan15}
and \cite[\S 6.3]{GL15}.
Deligne consider the triplet
\[
 {\rm Tri}(F):=(\mathfrak{o}_F / \mathfrak{p}_F,\mathfrak{p}_F/\mathfrak{p}^2_F,\xi)
\]
where $\xi$ is the trivial map of $\mathfrak{p}_F/\mathfrak{p}^2_F$ onto $\mathfrak{p}_F/\mathfrak{p}_F \cong \{0 \}$.
If $F$ and $F'$ is $1$-close, the isomorphism of triplet ${\rm Tri}(F)={\rm Tri}(F')$ gives rise to an isomorphism:
\[
  {\rm Gal}(\overline{F}/F)/I^1_F \xrightarrow{ \rm Del} {\rm Gal}(\overline{F'}/F')/I^1_{F'},
\]
where $\overline{F}$ is a separable algebraic closure of $F$, $I^0_F:=I_F$ is the inertia subgroup, and $I^1_F:=P_F$ is the wild inertia subgroup. This produces a bijection:
\begin{multline}
\label{Del-corr}
\{ \text{continuous complex finite dimensional representation $\phi$ of $ {\rm Gal}(\overline{F}/F)$ trivial on $I^1_F$} \}\\
 \xleftrightarrow{ \rm Del}
 \{ \text{continuous complex finite dimensional representation $\phi'$ of $ {\rm Gal}(\overline{F'}/F')$ trivial on $I^1_{F'}$} \}.
\end{multline}
Moreover, the above holds when ${\rm Gal}(\overline{F}/F)$, the absolute Galois group, is replaced by $W_F$, the Weil group of $F$.
Elements $\phi$ and $\phi'$ are so-called {\it tamely ramified}. The Weil representation $\phi$ is tamely ramified if the kernel of $\phi$ contains the wild inertia subgroup $I^1_F$ (cf. \cite[\S 2]{YZ21}). The triplet $(F,\phi,\psi)$ is said to be {\rm Del}-{\it associated to} $(F',\phi',\psi')$ if
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\alph*})$]
\item $F$ and $F'$ are $1$-close;
\item $\phi'= {\rm Del}(\phi)$;
\item an additive character $\psi'$ of $F'$ satisfies ${\rm cond}(\psi')=1$ and $\psi'|_{\mathfrak{o}_{F'}/\mathfrak{p}_{F'}}=\psi|_{\mathfrak{o}_{F}/\mathfrak{p}_{F}}$.
 \end{enumerate}

Let $\gamma(s,\wedge \circ \phi,\psi)$ denote the Artin exterior square $\gamma$-factor. We then have a following proposition \cite[Proposition 6.2]{GL15}.

\begin{proposition}
\label{Deligne-corres}
For $(F,\phi,\psi)$ that is {\rm Del}-{\it associated to} $(F',\phi',\psi')$, we have
\[
  \gamma(s,\wedge \circ \phi,\psi)=\gamma(s,\wedge \circ \phi',\psi').
\]
\end{proposition}

The analogous isomorphism of Deligne on the analytic side over close local fields has been studied by  Kazhdan \cite[\S 2.3]{Gan15}.
We provide a variant of the Kazhdan isomorphism \cite[\S 6.2]{GL15}, which can be directly verified from the construction as in \cite[Theorem 3.5]{YZ20}:
\begin{equation}
\label{Kaz-corr}
  \left\{ \begin{split} &\text{\quad\quad\; level zero supercuspidal} \\ &\text{ representations $(\pi,V)$ of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$} \end{split} \right\}
  \xleftrightarrow{ \rm Kaz}   \left\{ \begin{split} &\quad\quad\quad \text{level zero supercuspidal} \\ &\text{ representations $(\pi',V')$ of ${\rm GL}_n(F')$} \end{split} \right\},
\end{equation}
where $\pi \cong {\rm c\text{-}Ind}^{{\rm GL}_n(F)}_{F^{\times}{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_F)} \widetilde{\lambda}$ and $\pi' \cong {\rm c\text{-}Ind}^{{\rm GL}_n(F')}_{{F'}^{\times}{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_{F'})} \widetilde{\lambda}'$ under the isomorphism $``\rm Kaz"$ satisfy
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\roman*})$]
  \item $\omega_{\pi}(\varpi_F)=\omega_{\pi'}(\varpi_{F'})$;
\item $\lambda:=\widetilde{\lambda}|_{{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_F)}$ and $\lambda':=\widetilde{\lambda}'|_{{\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_{F'})}$
are an inflation of a common irreducible cuspidal representation $\tau$ via the canonical projections:
\[
\xymatrixcolsep{4pc}
 \xymatrix{
 ({\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_F),\lambda) \ar[r]^{{\rm   mod}\,\, \mathfrak{p}_F} & ({\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q),\tau) &\ar[l]_{\quad {\rm  mod}\,\, \mathfrak{p}_{F'}}
( {\rm GL}_n(\mathfrak{o}_{F'}),\lambda').
 }
\]
 \end{enumerate}

 We say that the triplet $(F,\pi,\psi)$ is {\rm Kaz}-{\it associated to} $(F',\pi',\psi')$ if
 \begin{enumerate}[label=$(\mathrm{\alph*})$]
\item $F$ and $F'$ are $1$-close;
\item $\pi'= {\rm Kaz}(\pi)$;
\item an additive character $\psi'$ of $F'$ satisfies ${\rm cond}(\psi')=1$ and $\psi'|_{\mathfrak{o}_{F'}/\mathfrak{p}_{F'}}=\psi|_{\mathfrak{o}_{F}/\mathfrak{p}_{F}}$.
 \end{enumerate}

 Let $\tau_1$ be an irreducible cuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ and $\tau_2$ an irreducible cuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_t(\mathbb{F}_q)$
 with $n > t$.  Then there exists a complex number $\Gamma(\tau_1 \times \tau_2,\psi) \in \mathbb{C}$ such that
 \[
  \Gamma(\tau_1 \times \tau_2,\psi) \sum_{g \in {U}_t(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_t(\mathbb{F}_q)} W \begin{pmatrix} g & 0 \\ 0 & 1_{n-t} \end{pmatrix} W'(g)
  =\sum_{g \in {U}_t(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_t(\mathbb{F}_q)} W \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1_{n-t} \\ g & 0 \end{pmatrix} W'(g),
 \]
 for all $W \in \mathcal{W}(\tau_1,\psi)$ and $W' \in \mathcal{W}(\tau_2,\psi^{-1})$ \cite[Theorem 2.3]{Nie19}.
 Let $\pi_1$ be a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ associated to $\tau_1$ and $\pi_2$ a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_t(F)$
 associated to $\tau_2$ , with $n > t$. Let $\gamma(s,\pi_1 \times \pi_2,\psi)$ denote the Rankin-Selberg $\gamma$-factor defined by Jacquet, Piatetski-Shapiro, and Shalika \cite[Theorem 2.1]{Nie19}.

 \begin{lemma}
 \label{level-zero-RS}
 For $(F,\pi_1,\pi_2,\psi)$ that is {\rm Kaz}-{\it associated to} $(F',\pi'_1,\pi'_2,\psi')$, we have
 \[
  \gamma(s,\pi_1 \times \pi_2,\psi)= \gamma(s,\pi'_1 \times \pi'_2,\psi').
 \]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
With aid of \cite[Theorem 4.2]{Nie19}, we can relate gamma factors for a pair of level zero supercuspidal representations with
those for the corresponding cuspidal representations over finite fields:
\[
 \omega^{n-1}_{\tau_2}(-1)\gamma(s,\pi_1 \times \pi_2,\psi)={\rm Vol}(\mathfrak{p}_F)^{-t(n-t-1)} \Gamma(\tau_1 \times \tau_2,\psi).
\]
Upon recalling from \S \ref{sec-intertwining} that we normalize the Haar measure on $F$ so that the volume of $\mathfrak{o}_F$ is $1$, we find that
\[
 \omega^{n-1}_{\tau_2}(-1)\gamma(s,\pi_1 \times \pi_2,\psi)=q_F^{t(n-t-1)} \Gamma(\tau_1 \times \tau_2,\psi),
\]
in which case it is equal to $ \omega^{n-1}_{\tau_2}(-1)\gamma(s,\pi'_1 \times \pi'_2,\psi')$.
\end{proof}

Following the literature in \cite{YZ21}, we let $\Pi_0({\rm GL}_n(F))$ be the set of equivalence classes of level zero supercuspidal representations of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$.
We set $\Phi^t({\rm GL}_n(F))$ to be the isomorphism classes of tamely ramified Weil representation of $W_F$
of degree $n$.
We apologize for the double usage of $``t"$, but we hope that the reader can separate the meaning from the context.
Since the local Langlands reciprocity map preserves the conductor and the depth of the representation \cite[Theorem 7.3]{Gan15},
the correspondence induces a natural bijective map ${\rm LLC} : \Pi_0({\rm GL}_n(F)) \rightarrow \Phi^t({\rm GL}_n(F))$ \cite[Appendix A]{SZ08} (cf. \cite[\S 7]{Gan15}).
The assignment $``{\rm LLC}"$ is now reconciled with the Deligne-Kazhdan theory \eqref{Del-corr} and \eqref{Kaz-corr}.

\begin{proposition}
\label{commu-LLC}
We assume that non-archimedean local fields $F$ and $F'$ are $1$-close. Then the following diagram commutes:
\[
\xymatrixcolsep{4pc}
\xymatrixrowsep{2pc}
\xymatrix{
&\Pi_0({\rm GL}_n(F)) \ar[d]^{\cong}_{\rm Kaz} \ar[r]^{\rm LLC}_{\cong} & \Phi^t({\rm GL}_n(F)) \ar[d]^{\rm Del}_{\cong} \\
&\Pi_0({\rm GL}_n(F')) \ar[r]^{\rm LLC}_{\cong} &\Phi^t({\rm GL}_n(F'))}
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
We will prove this theorem by induction on $n$. When  $n=1$, the Deligne-Kazhdan philosophy is compatible with local class field theory \cite[Property (i) of \S 2.1]{Gan15}.
Now we assume that the Proposition holds for $1 \leq t \leq n-1$. Let $\pi_1 \in \Pi_0({\rm GL}_n(F))$ and $\tau \in \Pi_0({\rm GL}_t(F))$. Let $\phi_{\pi_1}$ and $\phi_{\tau}$
denote the local Langlands parameter attached to $\pi_1$ and $\tau$, respectively. We put $\pi'_1={\rm Kaz}(\pi_1)$ and $\tau'={\rm Kaz}(\tau)$.
Writing $\pi_2={\rm LLC}^{-1} \circ {\rm Del}^{-1}(\phi_{\pi'_1})$, the corresponding local Langlands parameter $\phi_{\pi_2}$ is Del-associated to $\phi_{\pi'_1}$.
In view of \cite[$({\rm d})$ of Theorem 7.1]{Gan15} along with \cite[Property (i) of \S 2.1]{Gan15} again, $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ share the same central character $\omega_{\pi_1}=\omega_{\pi_2}$.
By induction hypothesis, we have
\[
\tau={\rm LLC}^{-1} \circ {\rm Del}^{-1}(\phi_{\tau'}).
\]
This leads us to a chain of identities:
\begin{multline*}
  \gamma(s,\pi_1 \times \tau,\psi)= \gamma(s,\pi'_1 \times \tau',\psi')=\gamma(s,\phi_{\pi'_1}\otimes\phi_{\tau'},\psi')\\
  =\gamma(s,\phi_{\pi_2}\otimes {\rm Del}^{-1}(\phi_{\tau'}),\psi)
  =\gamma(s,\pi_2 \times {\rm LLC}^{-1} \circ {\rm Del}^{-1}(\phi_{\tau'}),\psi)
  =\gamma(s,\pi_2 \times \tau,\psi)
\end{multline*}
for all $\tau \in \Pi_0({\rm GL}_t(F))$ and $1 \leq t \leq n-1$. Here, the second and fourth equalities are a part of local Langlands correspondence  \cite[$({\rm b})$ of Theorem 7.1]{Gan15},
the third equality follows from  \cite[Property (iii) of \S 2.1]{Gan15} due to Deligne, and the first equality is clear from Lemma \ref{level-zero-RS}.
Then by the local converse theorem for  level zero supercuspidal representations \cite[Theorem 5.3]{Ye19}, we conclude that $\pi_1 \cong \pi_2$ from which the desired commutative diagram follows.
\end{proof}

We define the Fourier transform on $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{F}_q^m)$ by
\[
 \hat{\Phi}(y)=q^{-m/2}\sum_{x \in \mathbb{F}_q^m} \Phi(x) \psi (x\,{^ty}).
\]
The Fourier inversion formula for this normalization is given by $\hat{\hat{\Phi}}(x)=\Phi(-x)$. Let $\tau$ be an irreducible cuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$. For all $W \in \mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$ and $\Phi \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{F}_q^m)$,
there exists a complex number $ \Gamma(\tau,\wedge^2,\psi)   \in \mathbb{C}$ such that
\begin{multline*}
 \Gamma(\tau,\wedge^2,\psi)
 \sum_{g \in {U}_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(\mathbb{F}_q)} \sum_{X \in \mathcal{N}_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(\mathbb{F}_q)} \sum_{z \in \mathbb{F}_q^m}\\
 W \left( \sigma_{2m+1} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m &X& \\ &1_m& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g && \\ &g& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix}
 \begin{pmatrix} 1_m && \\ &1_m& \\ &z&1 \end{pmatrix} \right)
 \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X)  \Phi(z) \\
\hspace{-8.5cm} =\sum_{g \in U_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(\mathbb{F}_q)}  \sum_{X \in \mathcal{N}_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(\mathbb{F}_q)}
 \sum_{z \in \mathbb{F}_q^m} \\
 W \left( \begin{pmatrix} & 1 \\ 1_{2m} & \end{pmatrix} \sigma_{2m+1} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m &X& \\ &1_m& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g && \\ &g& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m &&-^tZ \\ &1_m& \\ &&1 \end{pmatrix} \right)   \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X)  \hat{\Phi}(z)
\end{multline*}
in the odd case $n=2m+1$, and
\begin{multline*}
 \Gamma(\tau,\wedge^2,\psi) \sum_{g \in U_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(\mathbb{F}_q)} \sum_{X \in \mathcal{N}_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(\mathbb{F}_q)} W \left( \sigma_{2m} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m & X \\ & 1_m  \end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g \end{pmatrix} \right)  \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X) \Phi(e_mg)  \\
 =\sum_{g \in U_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(\mathbb{F}_q)} \sum_{X \in \mathcal{N}_m(\mathbb{F}_q) \backslash \mathcal{M}_{m}(\mathbb{F}_q)} W \left( \sigma_{2m} \begin{pmatrix} 1_m & X \\ & 1_m  \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g \end{pmatrix} \right)  \psi^{-1}({\rm Tr}\;X) \hat{\Phi}(e_1\prescript{t}{}{g}^{-1})
\end{multline*}
in the even case $n=2m$ \cite[Theorem 2.8]{YZ20}.

\par
We define a Shalika subgroup of $S_{2m}(F)$ of ${\rm GL}_{2m}(F)$ by
\[
  S_{2m}(F)=\left\{ \begin{pmatrix} 1_m & X \\ & 1_m \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g \end{pmatrix} \,\middle|\, X \in \mathcal{M}_m(F), g \in {\rm GL}_m(F) \right\}.
\]
Let $\Theta$ be a Shalika character of $S_{2m}(F)$ given by
\[
  \Theta \left(  \begin{pmatrix} 1_m & X \\ & 1_m \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g \end{pmatrix} \right)=\psi({\rm Tr} \,X).
\]
 In contrast to \S \ref{sec-intertwining}, we normalize the multiplicative Haar measure $d^{\times} x$ on $F^{\times}$ so that the volume of $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}_F$ is $1$
for the sake of convenience (cf. \cite[\S 3.1.1]{YZ20}).

\begin{proposition}
\label{Kaz-corres}
For $(F,\pi,\psi)$ that is {\rm Kaz}-{\it associated to} $(F',\pi',\psi')$, we have
\[
    \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)=\gamma(s,\pi',\wedge,\psi') \quad \text{and} \quad
\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)=\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi',\wedge,\psi').
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
We consider the first equality. Proposition 3.23 in \cite{YZ20} yields the equivalent condition that
${\rm Hom}_{S_{2m}(F)}(\pi\otimes|\det(\cdot)|^{s/2},\Theta) \neq 0$ for some $s \in \mathbb{C}$ if and only if ${\rm Hom}_{S_{2m}(F')}(\pi'\otimes|\det(\cdot)|^{s'/2},\Theta') \neq 0$ for some $s' \in \mathbb{C}$.
If this is the case, we use \cite[Theorem 3.17]{YZ20} in conjunction with the fact that $\omega_{\pi}(\varpi_F)=\omega_{\pi'}(\varpi_{F'})$ to prove
\begin{equation}
\label{even-exterior-JS}
 \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)=\dfrac{q_F^{m(s-1/2)}}{\omega_{\pi}(\varpi_F)}\cdot \dfrac{L(m(1-s),\omega^{-1}_{\pi})}{L(ms,\omega_{\pi})}
 =\dfrac{q_{F'}^{m(s-1/2)}}{\omega_{\pi'}(\varpi_{F'})}\cdot \dfrac{L(m(1-s),\omega^{-1}_{\pi'})}{L(ms,\omega_{\pi'})}
 =\gamma(s,\pi',\wedge,\psi').
 \end{equation}
Otherwise, owing to \cite[Theorem 3.16]{YZ20}, we are guided to
\begin{equation}
\label{odd-exterior-JS}
\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)= \Gamma(\tau,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma(s,\pi',\wedge,\psi').
\end{equation}

\par
Next, we deal with the second equality. Let $\pi(\phi)$ be a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ obtained from a tamely ramified Weil representation $\phi$ of $W_F$ of degree $n$
via the local Langlands correspondence (LLC).
The identity
\begin{equation}
\label{equal-artin}
\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)=\gamma(s,\wedge \circ \phi,\psi)
\end{equation}
relating analytic $\gamma$-factors $\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge,\psi)$ with corresponding Artin factors $\gamma(s,\wedge \circ \phi,\psi)$
 has been established for non-archimedean local fields $F$ of characteristic $0$ in \cite{CST17}
and positive characteristic in \cite{HL11}. For $(F,\phi,\psi)$ that is {\rm Del}-associated to $(F',\phi',\psi')$, a similar notation $\pi'(\phi')$ applies to $\phi'$.
We see from Proposition \ref{commu-LLC} that $\pi(\phi)$ is Kaz-associated to $\pi'(\phi')$, at which point Proposition \ref{Deligne-corres} together with \eqref{equal-artin} completes the proof.
\end{proof}

It is time to bring Deligne-Kazhdan close field theory and Theorem \ref{exter-positive} back together for good use.

\begin{theorem}
\label{equal-zero-exterior}
Let $\pi$ be a level zero representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ over a $p$-adic field $F$. Then we have
\[
  \gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma_{\rm LS}(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Given a local field $F'$ of characteristic $p$ and an integer $m \geq 1$, there exists a local field $F$ of characteristic $0$ such that $F'$ is $m$-close to $F$ \cite[p.1123]{GL15}. The converse also holds for $m=1$. Specifically, for a field $F$ of characteristic $0$, its residue field $\mathfrak{o}_F/\mathfrak{p}_F$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ with $q=p^k$ for some prime $p$ and integer $k \geq 1$. Then we take $F'$ to be $\mathbb{F}_{q}((t))$ of characteristic $p$. Combining Theorem \ref{exter-positive} with Proposition \ref{Kaz-corres}, we can ultimately transfer the identity over a local function field $F'$ in Theorem \ref{exter-positive} to
a $p$-adic field $F$.
\end{proof}

\subsection{Bump-Friedberg integrals}
\label{Rankin-Selberg-BF}
We introduce another construction of $\gamma$-factor, using the formulation of Bump and Friedberg \cite{BF89}.
We define the embedding $J: {\rm GL}_m \times {\rm GL}_m \rightarrow {\rm GL}_n$ by
\[
 J(g,g^{\prime})_{k,l}=
  \begin{cases}
  g_{i,j} &  \text{if $k=2i-1$, $l=2j-1$, } \\
  g^{\prime}_{i,j} &  \text{if $k=2i$, $l=2j$,} \\
 0 &  \text{otherwise,} \\
  \end{cases}
\]
for $n=2m$ even
and  $J: {\rm GL}_{m+1} \times {\rm GL}_m \rightarrow {\rm GL}_n$ by
\[
 J(g,g^{\prime})_{k,l}=
  \begin{cases}
  g_{i,j} &  \text{if $k=2i-1$, $l=2j-1$, } \\
  g^{\prime}_{i,j} &  \text{if $k=2i$, $l=2j$,} \\
 0 &  \text{otherwise,} \\
  \end{cases}
\]
for $n=2m+1$ odd. For the purpose of keeping consistent terminology with \cite{Mat17},
we interchange the role of $g$ and $g'$ in \cite{BF89}.
We set $m':=m$ if $n=2m$ and $m':=m+1$ if $n=2m+1$.
For each Whittaker function $W \in \mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$ and Schwartz-Bruhat function $\Phi \in \mathcal{S}(F^n)$, we define Bump-Friedberg integrals $ Z(s_1,s_2,W,\Phi)$ by
\[
 \int_{U_m(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(F)} \int_{U_m(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(F)} W(J(g,g^{\prime})) \Phi(e_{m'}g') |\mathrm{det}(g)|^{s_1-1/2} |\mathrm{det}(g^{\prime})|^{1/2+s_2-s_1} dg dg^{\prime}
\]
in the even case $n=2m$ and
\[
 \int_{U_m(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_m(F)} \int_{U_{m+1}(F) \backslash {\rm GL}_{m+1}(F)} W(J(g,g^{\prime})) \Phi(e_{m'}g) |\mathrm{det}(g)|^{s_1} |\mathrm{det}(g^{\prime})|^{s_2-s_1} dg dg^{\prime}
 \]
 in the odd case $n=2m+1$.
 In accord with the standard language, we retain notations from Matringe \cite{Mat17}. For $n=2m$ even, we denote by $M_{2m}(F)$ the standard Levi of ${\rm GL}_{2m}(F)$ associated with the partition $(m,m)$ of $2m$. Let $w_{2m}=\sigma_{2m}$ and then we set $H_{2m}(F)=w_{2m}M_{2m}(F)w^{-1}_{2m}$. Let $w_{2m+1}=w_{2m+2}|_{{\rm GL}_{2m+1}(F)}$ so that
\[
 w_{2m+1}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & \dotsm & m+1 & | & m+2 & m+3 & \dotsm &2m & 2m+1 \\
                                                1 & 3 & \dotsm & 2m+1 & | &  2 & 4 & \dotsm & 2m-2 &2m \\
                                                \end{pmatrix}.
\]
In the odd case, $w_{2m+1} \neq \sigma_{2m+1}$ and we let $M_{2m+1}(F)$ denote the standard Levi associated to the partition $(m+1,m)$ of $2m+1$. We set $H_{2m+1}(F)=w_{2m+1}M_{2m+1}(F)w^{-1}_{2m+1}$. We note that $H_n(F)$ is compatible with the intersection in the sense that $H_n(F) \cap {\rm GL}_{n-1}(F)=H_{n-1}(F)$ and we can easily see that $J(g,g')=w_n \mathrm{diag}(g,g') w^{-1}_n$ for $\mathrm{diag}(g,g') \in M_n(F)$. If $r$ a real number, we denote by $\delta_r$ the character,
 \[
  \delta_r : J(g,g') \mapsto   \left| \frac{\mathrm{det}(g)}{\mathrm{det}(g')} \right|^r.
 \]
  We denote by $\chi_n$ characters of $H_n$:
\[
  \chi_n\left( w_n \begin{pmatrix} g & \\ & g' \end{pmatrix} w^{-1}_n\right)=
  \begin{cases}
{\bf 1}_{H_n(F)} & \text{for $n=2m$;} \\
\displaystyle  \left| \frac{\mathrm{det}(g)}{\mathrm{det}(g^{\prime})} \right| & \text{for $n=2m+1$.} \\
\end{cases}
\]
We turn toward the case for $s_1=s+t+1/2$ and $s_2=2s$. We combine the previous Bump-Friedberg zeta integrals with one single integral in the fashion:
\[
Z(s,t,W,\Phi)=\int_{(U_n(F) \cap H_n(F)) \backslash H_n(F)} W(h)  \Phi(e_nh) \chi^{1/2}_n(h) \delta_t(h)  |\mathrm{det}(h)|^s \, dh.
\]
This integral converges absolutely for ${\rm Re}(s)$ and ${\rm Re}(t)$ sufficiently large, and it admits a meromorphic extension to $\mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{C}$
as an element of $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s},q^{-t})$ \cite[Proposition 3.1]{Mat17}. According to \cite[Corollary 3.2]{Mat17},
there exists a rational function $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$ in $\mathbb{C}(q^{-s},q^{-t})$ such that
for every $W$ in $\mathcal{W}(\pi,\psi)$, and every $\Phi$ in $\mathcal{S}(F^{m'})$, we have the following functional equation
\begin{equation}
\label{FunctionalEquation-BF}
 Z(1/2-s,-1/2-t,\check{W},\hat{\Phi})=\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)Z(s,t,W,\Phi).
\end{equation}
Unlike the Jacquet and Shalika local factor $\gamma(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$, the Bump and Friedberg  local factor $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$
possesses two parameters, $s$ and $t$. For this reason, $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$ is not really defined as a proportionality, but rather the functional equation for the $\varepsilon$-factor, $\varepsilon(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$, need to be established beforehand.

\begin{lemma}
\label{spherical-rep-BF}
Let $F$ be a local function field. Let $\pi$ be an irreducible subquotient of the unramified principal series representation ${\rm Ind}_{B_n(F)}^{{\rm GL}_n(F)}(\mu_1 \otimes \dotsm \otimes \mu_n )$,
where each $\mu_i$ is an unramified character of $F^{\times}$, that is to say, it is invariant under the maximal compact subgroup $\mathfrak{o}^{\times}$ of $F^{\times}$. Then we have
\begin{multline*}
\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi) \\
=\prod_{1 \leq i \leq n} \gamma(s+t+1/2,\mu_i,\psi)\prod_{1\leq j < k \leq n} \gamma(2s,\mu_j \times \mu_k,\psi).
\end{multline*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The proof of Lemma \ref{spherical-rep-JS} literally goes through word by word except that we use the unramified computation of
Bump and Friedberg \cite[Theorem 3]{BF89} in place of \cite[\S 2]{JS88} (cf. Readers may refer to \cite[Proposition 1.2]{Ish18} for an alternative proof of unramified computations).
\end{proof}

We are now in a position to formulate the main factorization formula conjectured by Bump and Friedberg \cite[Conjecture 4]{BF89}.

\begin{theorem}
\label{main-BF-factor}
Let $\pi$ be a level zero supercuspidal representation of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ over  a local function field $F$. Then we have
\[
  \gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)\gamma(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi).
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
With the help of \cite[\S 6.6-(vii)]{Lom16}, twists by unramified characters do not affect on the first equality. For this reason,
we may assume that $\pi$ is unitary without loss of generality. We find a finite set $S=\{ v_0,v_1,v_{\infty}\}$ as in Theorem \ref{Lomeli-Globalization}.
We choose a non-trivial additive character $\Psi$ of $\mathbb{A}_k \slash k$, and assume, as we may, that $\Psi_{v_0}=\psi$.
Applying Theorem \ref{Lomeli-Globalization} to the irreducible level zero,
we obtain an irreducible unitary cuspidal automorphic representation $\Pi$.
The global functional equation for exterior square $L$-functions via the Langlands-Shahidi method can be read from \cite[\S4-(vi)]{HL11} as
\eqref{LS-global-exterior}, while that for standard $L$-functions due to Godement and Jacquet is extracted from \cite{GJ72} as
\begin{equation}
\label{partial-GJ}
  L^{S}(s,\Pi)=\gamma(s,\Pi_{v_0},\Psi_{v_0}) \prod_{v \in S-\{ v_0\}} \gamma(s,\Pi_v,\Psi_v)  L^{S}(1-s,\check{\Pi}).
\end{equation}
In the meantime, taking into account local functional equations \eqref{FunctionalEquation-BF},
the global functional equation for Bump-Friedberg $L$-functions via the Rankin-Selberg method in \cite[Theorem 6]{BF89} (cf. \cite[(1.1)]{Ish18}) takes
the following explicit form:
\begin{multline}
\label{partial-BF}
  L^S(s+t+1/2,\Pi,\psi)L^S(2s,\Pi,\wedge^2)\\
  =\gamma(s,t,\Pi_{v_0},{\rm BF},\Psi_{v_0}) \prod_{v \in S-\{ v_0\}} \gamma(s,t,\Pi_v,{\rm BF},\Psi_v) L^S(1/2-s-t,\check{\Pi}) L^{S}(1-2s,\check{\Pi},\wedge^2).
\end{multline}
Invoking Lemma \ref{spherical-rep-BF}, each places $v$ in $S-\{ v_0\}$ can be controlled in such a way that
\[
\gamma(s,t,\Pi_v,{\rm BF},\Psi_v)=\gamma(s+t+1/2,\Pi_v,\Psi_v)\gamma_{\rm LS}(2s,\Pi_v,\wedge^2,\Psi_v).
\]
After suitably adjusting the parameter $s$, the case for positive characteristics is at least done by dividing \eqref{partial-BF} by the product of \eqref{LS-global-exterior} and \eqref{partial-GJ}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{rmk-gauss}
While we do not prove this, our approach using Deligne-Kazhdan close field theory can very probably go through to show that
the Bump and Friedberg exterior square $\gamma$-factor $\gamma(s,t,\pi,{\rm BF},\psi)$ is factored into
the Godement and Jacquet standard $\gamma$-factor
$\gamma(s+t+1/2,\pi,\psi)$, and the Jacquet and Shalika exterior square $\gamma$-factor $\gamma(2s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$
over non-archimedean local fields $F$ of characteristic zero just as in the proof of Theorem \ref{equal-zero-exterior}.
We are unable to deduce the decomposition, that is to say, Theorem \ref{main-BF-factor} in characteristic zero,
because at least to the best of our knowledge, the computation of  Bump and Friedberg integrals  for level zero supercuspidal representations analogue to Jacquet and Shalika cases \eqref{even-exterior-JS} and \eqref{odd-exterior-JS} \cite[Theorems 3.16 and 3.17]{YZ20}
is not known at this moment. Jointly with E.  Zelingher \cite{YZ20,YZ21}, this project in connection with the product formula in terms of Gauss sums is currently underway.
\end{remark}

\begin{acknowledgements}
I am deeply indebted to Muthu Krishnamurthy for introducing his unfinished project \cite{KK} to me. Without his suggestion and countless encouragement, this paper never has come into existence.
Thanks are owed to David Schwein for presenting the close field theory in Harish-Chandra learning seminar, where I first learned the topic. I also want to take this opportunity to thank to
Jack Buttcane, Brandon Hanson, Andrew Knightly, and Elad Zelingher for fruitful mathematical conversation and their feedbacks on some aspects of this manuscript.
I am grateful to the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at University of Maine for their warm hospitality, while the paper was written.
\end{acknowledgements}

\begin{funding}
This work was supported by the Ewha Womans University Research Grant of 2022.
\end{funding}

\begin{data availability}
This manuscript has no associated data.
\end{data availability}

 \bibliographystyle{amsplain}

\begin{bibdiv}
\begin{biblist}

\bib{AKMSS21}{article}{
   author={Anandavardhanan, U. K.},
   author={Kurinczuk, R.},
   author={Matringe, N.},
   author={S\'{e}cherre, V.},
   author={Stevens, S.},
   title={Galois self-dual cuspidal types and Asai local factors},
   journal={J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)},
   volume={23},
   date={2021},
   number={9},
   pages={3129--3191},
  }

\bib{BF89}{article}{
   author={Bump, Daniel},
   author={Friedberg, Solomon},
   title={The exterior square automorphic $L$-functions on ${\rm GL}(n)$},
   conference={
      title={Festschrift in honor of I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro on the occasion
      of his sixtieth birthday, Part II},
      address={Ramat Aviv},
      date={1989},
   },
   book={
      series={Israel Math. Conf. Proc.},
      volume={3},
      publisher={Weizmann, Jerusalem},
   },
   date={1990},
   pages={47--65},
}

\bib{BH06}{book}{
   author={Bushnell, Colin J.},
   author={Henniart, Guy},
   title={The local Langlands conjecture for $\rm GL(2)$},
   series={Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental
   Principles of Mathematical Sciences]},
   volume={335},
   publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
   date={2006},
   pages={xii+347},
   }

   \bib{BK98}{article}{
   author={Bushnell, Colin J.},
   author={Kutzko, Philip C.},
   title={Smooth representations of reductive $p$-adic groups: structure
   theory via types},
   journal={Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)},
   volume={77},
   date={1998},
   number={3},
   pages={582--634},
}

\bib{Cas80}{article}{
   author={Casselman, W.},
   title={The unramified principal series of ${\germ p}$-adic groups. I. The
   spherical function},
   journal={Compositio Math.},
   volume={40},
   date={1980},
   number={3},
   pages={387--406},
  }

\bib{CS18}{article}{
   author={Chan, Kei Yuen},
   author={Savin, Gordan},
   title={Iwahori component of the Gelfand-Graev representation},
   journal={Math. Z.},
   volume={288},
   date={2018},
   number={1-2},
   pages={125--133},
  }

\bib{CM15}{article}{
   author={Cogdell, James W.},
   author={Matringe, Nadir},
   title={The functional equation of the Jacquet-Shalika integral
   representation of the local exterior-square $L$-function},
   journal={Math. Res. Lett.},
   volume={22},
   date={2015},
   number={3},
   pages={697--717},
}

\bib{CST17}{article}{
   author={Cogdell, J. W.},
   author={Shahidi, F.},
   author={Tsai, T.-L.},
   title={Local Langlands correspondence for ${\rm GL}_n$ and the exterior
   and symmetric square $\varepsilon$-factors},
   journal={Duke Math. J.},
   volume={166},
   date={2017},
   number={11},
   pages={2053--2132},
}

  \bib{Del84}{article}{
   author={Deligne, P.},
   title={Les corps locaux de caract\'{e}ristique $p$, limites de corps locaux
   de caract\'{e}ristique $0$},
   language={French},
   conference={
      title={Representations of reductive groups over a local field},
   },
   book={
      series={Travaux en Cours},
      publisher={Hermann, Paris},
   },
   date={1984},
   pages={119--157},
  }

   \bib{Gan15}{article}{
   author={Ganapathy, Radhika},
   title={The local Langlands correspondence for $\rm GSp_4$ over local
   function fields},
   journal={Amer. J. Math.},
   volume={137},
   date={2015},
   number={6},
   pages={1441--1534},
  }

  \bib{GL15}{article}{
   author={Ganapathy, Radhika},
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis},
   title={On twisted exterior and symmetric square $\gamma$-factors},
   language={English, with English and French summaries},
   journal={Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)},
   volume={65},
   date={2015},
   number={3},
   pages={1105--1132},
  }

  \bib{HL11}{article}{
   author={Henniart, Guy},
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis},
   title={Local-to-global extensions for ${\rm GL}_n$ in non-zero
   characteristic: a characterization of $\gamma_F(s,\pi,{\rm Sym}^2,\psi)$
   and $\gamma_F(s,\pi,\wedge^2,\psi)$},
   journal={Amer. J. Math.},
   volume={133},
   date={2011},
   number={1},
   pages={187--196},
  }

  \bib{HL13}{article}{
   author={Henniart, Guy},
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis},
   title={Uniqueness of Rankin-Selberg products},
   journal={J. Number Theory},
   volume={133},
   date={2013},
   number={12},
   pages={4024--4035},
 }

   \bib{HJ21}{article}{
 author={Humphries, Peter}
   author={Jo, Yeongseong},
    title={\it Test vectors for Archimedean period integrals},
    date={2021},
  pages={available at \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06860}},
 }

  \bib{GJ72}{book}{
   author={Godement, Roger},
   author={Jacquet, Herv\'{e}},
   title={Zeta functions of simple algebras},
   series={Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 260},
   publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York},
   date={1972},
   pages={ix+188},
}

\bib{Ish18}{article}{
   author={Ishii, Taku},
   title={Archimedean zeta integrals for the exterior square $L$-functions
   on ${\rm GL}_n$},
   journal={J. Number Theory},
   volume={186},
   date={2018},
   pages={304--345},
 }

\bib{JS88}{article}{
   author={Jacquet, Herv\'{e}},
   author={Shalika, Joseph},
   title={Exterior square $L$-functions},
   conference={
      title={Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and $L$-functions, Vol.
      II},
      address={Ann Arbor, MI},
      date={1988},
   },
   book={
      series={Perspect. Math.},
      volume={11},
      publisher={Academic Press, Boston, MA},
   },
   date={1990},
   pages={143--226},
}

\bib{Jo20}{article}{
   author={Jo, Yeongseong},
   title={Derivatives and exceptional poles of the local exterior square
   $L$-function for $GL_m$},
   journal={Math. Z.},
   volume={294},
   date={2020},
   number={3-4},
   pages={1687--1725},
}

\bib{Jo20-2}{article}{
   author={Jo, Yeongseong},
   title={Rankin-Selberg $L$-functions via good sections},
   journal={Forum Math.},
   volume={32},
   date={2020},
   number={4},
   pages={1039--1074},
  }

 \bib{Jo21}{article}{
   author={Jo, Yeongseong},
    title={\it The local exterior square and Asai $L$-functions for $GL(n)$ in odd characteristic},
    date={2021},
  pages={available at \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05865}},
 }

 \bib{JK21}{article}{
   author={Jo, Yeongseong},
   author={Krishnamurthy, M.},
   title={The Langlands-Shahidi method for pairs via types and covers},
   journal={Represent. Theory},
   volume={26},
   date={2022},
   pages={635--672},
}

\bib{Kim16}{article}{
   author={Kim, Ju-Lee},
   title={A generalized Casselman-Shalika formula on $GL_N$},
   conference={
      title={Advances in the theory of automorphic forms and their
      $L$-functions},
   },
   book={
      series={Contemp. Math.},
      volume={664},
      publisher={Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI},
   },
   date={2016},
   pages={209--223},
  }

 \bib{KK}{article}{
   author={Krishnamurthy, M.},
   author={Kutzko, P.},
   title={Computing local coefficients via types and covers: the example of
   $SL(2)$},
   journal={Bull. Iranian Math. Soc.},
   volume={43},
   date={2017},
   number={4},
   pages={221--234},
  }

  \bib{Kut04}{article}{
   author={Kutzko, Philip},
   title={Types and covers for SL(2)},
   conference={
      title={Contributions to automorphic forms, geometry, and number
      theory},
   },
   book={
      publisher={Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD},
   },
   date={2004},
   pages={599--610},
 }

 \bib{KM09}{article}{
   author={Kutzko, Philip},
   author={Morris, Lawrence},
   title={Explicit Plancherel theorems for $\scr H(q_1,q_2)$ and $\Bbb S\Bbb
   L_2(F)$},
   journal={Pure Appl. Math. Q.},
   volume={5},
   date={2009},
   number={1},
   pages={435--467},
}

\bib{Lom09}{article}{
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis Alberto},
   title={Functoriality for the classical groups over function fields},
   journal={Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN},
   date={2009},
   number={22},
   pages={4271--4335},
 }

 \bib{Lom15}{article}{
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis Alberto},
   title={The $\mathcal{LS}$ method for the classical groups in positive
   characteristic and the Riemann hypothesis},
   journal={Amer. J. Math.},
   volume={137},
   date={2015},
   number={2},
   pages={473--496},
 }

 \bib{Lom16}{article}{
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis Alberto},
   title={On automorphic $L$-functions in positive characteristic},
   language={English, with English and French summaries},
   journal={Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)},
   volume={66},
   date={2016},
   number={5},
   pages={1733--1771},
}

 \bib{Lom17}{article}{
   author={Lomel\'{\i}, Luis Alberto},
    title={\it The $\mathcal {LS}$ method over function fields: Ramanujan Conjecture and Riemann Hypothesis for the unitary groups},
    date={2017},
  pages={available at \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03625}},
 }

 \bib{Mat14}{article}{
   author={Matringe, Nadir},
   title={Linear and Shalika local periods for the mirabolic group, and some
   consequences},
   journal={J. Number Theory},
   volume={138},
   date={2014},
   pages={1--19},
  }

  \bib{Mat15-2}{article}{
   author={Matringe, Nadir},
   title={A specialisation of the Bump-Friedberg $L$-function},
   journal={Canad. Math. Bull.},
   volume={58},
   date={2015},
   number={3},
   pages={580--595},
}

 \bib{Mat15}{article}{
   author={Matringe, Nadir},
   title={On the local Bump-Friedberg $L$-function},
   journal={J. Reine Angew. Math.},
   volume={709},
   date={2015},
   pages={119--170},
}

 \bib{Mat17}{article}{
   author={Matringe, Nadir},
   title={On the local Bump-Friedberg $L$-function II},
   journal={Manuscripta Math.},
   volume={152},
   date={2017},
   number={1-2},
   pages={223--240},
}

 \bib{MP21}{article}{
   author={Mishra, Manish},
   author={Pattanayak, Basudev},
   title={Principal series component of Gelfand-Graev representation},
   journal={Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.},
   volume={149},
   date={2021},
   number={11},
   pages={4955--4962},
}

\bib{Nie19}{article}{
   author={Nien, Chufeng},
   title={Local gamma factors, converse theorems and related problems},
   conference={
      title={Representations of reductive $p$-adic groups},
   },
   book={
      series={Progr. Math.},
      volume={328},
      publisher={Birkh\"{a}user/Springer, Singapore},
   },
   date={2019},
   pages={191--205},
 }

\bib{Rod72}{article}{
   author={Rodier, Fran\c{c}ois},
   title={Whittaker models for admissible representations of reductive
   $p$-adic split groups},
   conference={
      title={Harmonic analysis on homogeneous spaces},
      address={Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XXVI, Williams Coll.,
      Williamstown, Mass.},
      date={1972},
   },
   book={
      publisher={Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I.},
   },
   date={1973},
   pages={425--430},
}

 \bib{SZ08}{article}{
   author={Silberger, Allan J.},
   author={Zink, Ernst-Wilhelm},
   title={Explicit Shintani base change and the Macdonald correspondence for
   characters of ${\rm GL}_n(k)$},
   journal={J. Algebra},
   volume={319},
   date={2008},
   number={10},
   pages={4147--4176},
}

  \bib{Sha78}{article}{
   author={Shahidi, Freydoon},
   title={Functional equation satisfied by certain $L$-functions},
   journal={Compositio Math.},
   volume={37},
   date={1978},
   number={2},
   pages={171--207},
}

\bib{Sha81}{article}{
   author={Shahidi, Freydoon},
   title={On certain $L$-functions},
   journal={Amer. J. Math.},
   volume={103},
   date={1981},
   number={2},
   pages={297--355},
 }

 \bib{Sha84}{article}{
   author={Shahidi, Freydoon},
   title={Fourier transforms of intertwining operators and Plancherel
   measures for ${\rm GL}(n)$},
   journal={Amer. J. Math.},
   volume={106},
   date={1984},
   number={1},
   pages={67--111},
 }

 \bib{Sha85}{article}{
   author={Shahidi, Freydoon},
   title={Local coefficients as Artin factors for real groups},
   journal={Duke Math. J.},
   volume={52},
   date={1985},
   number={4},
   pages={973--1007},
}

 \bib{Sha90}{article}{
   author={Shahidi, Freydoon},
   title={A proof of Langlands' conjecture on Plancherel measures;
   complementary series for $p$-adic groups},
   journal={Ann. of Math. (2)},
   volume={132},
   date={1990},
   number={2},
   pages={273--330},
  }

\bib{Sta90}{article}{
   author={Stade, Eric},
   title={On explicit integral formulas for ${\rm GL}(n,{\bf R})$-Whittaker
   functions},
   note={With an appendix by Daniel Bump, Solomon Friedberg and Jeffrey
   Hoffstein},
   journal={Duke Math. J.},
   volume={60},
   date={1990},
   number={2},
   pages={313--362},
  }

\bib{Tat77}{article}{
   author={Tate, J.},
   title={Number theoretic background},
   conference={
      title={Automorphic forms, representations and $L$-functions},
      address={Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis,
      Ore.},
      date={1977},
   },
   book={
      series={Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII},
      publisher={Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I.},
   },
   date={1979},
   pages={3--26},
  }

  \bib{Ye19}{article}{
   author={Ye, Rongqing},
   title={Rankin-Selberg gamma factors of level zero representations of
   ${\rm GL}_n$},
   journal={Forum Math.},
   volume={31},
   date={2019},
   number={2},
   pages={503--516},
   }

  \bib{YZ20}{article}{
   author={Ye, Rongqing},
   author={Zelingher, Elad},
   title={Exterior square gamma factors for cuspidal representations of
   ${\rm GL}_n$: finite field analogs and level-zero representations},
   journal={Israel J. Math.},
   volume={240},
   date={2020},
   number={2},
   pages={889--934},
  }

  \bib{YZ21}{article}{
   author={Ye, Rongqing},
   author={Zelingher, Elad},
   title={Epsilon factors of representations of finite general linear
   groups},
   journal={J. Number Theory},
   volume={221},
   date={2021},
   pages={122--142},
 }

\end{biblist}
\end{bibdiv}

\end{document}