Arminius, appealing to Lactantius, held that: 'To recommend faith to others, we must make it the subject of persuasion, and not of compulsion'. He insisted that the true religion from Christ does not deteriorate into dissention. In the exercise of Christian liberty there will be sincere and honest differences. These differences cannot and should not be stamped out by means of coercion. In confronting the Scripture, Christians should be able to agree on what is necessary for salvation. But when mutual consent and agreement cannot be obtained on some articles, 'then the right hand of fellowship should be extended by both parties'. Each party should 'acknowledge the other for partakers of the same faith and fellow-heirs of the same salvation, although they may hold different sentiments concerning the nature of faith and the manner of salvation'.
Gerald O. McCulloh, Man's Faith and Freedom: The Theological Influence of Jacobus Arminius
agreement, arminianism, arminius, bible, christ, christian-freedom, compulsion, consent, difference, difference-of-opinion, faith, fellowship, freedom, jesus, persuasion, religion, salvation, scriptures, theology