In her book claiming that allegations of ritualistic abuse are mostly confabulations, La Fontaine’s (1998) comparison of social workers to ‘nazis’ shows the depth of feeling evident amongst many sceptics. However, this raises an important question: Why did academics and journalists feel so strongly about allegations of ritualistic abuse, to the point of pervasively misrepresenting the available evidence and treating women disclosing ritualistic abuse, and those workers who support them, with barely concealed contempt? It is of course true that there are fringe practitioners in the field of organised abuse, just as there are fringe practitioners in many other health-related fields. However, the contrast between the measured tone of the majority of therapists and social workers writing on ritualistic abuse, and the over-blown sensationalism of their critics, could not be starker. Indeed, Scott (2001) notes with irony that the writings of those who claimed that ‘satanic ritual abuse’ is a ‘moral panic’ had many of the features of a moral panic: scapegoating therapists, social workers and sexual abuse victims whilst warning of an impending social catastrophe brought on by an epidemic of false allegations of sexual abuse. It is perhaps unsurprising that social movements for people accused of sexual abuse would engage in such hyperbole, but why did this rhetoric find so many champions in academia and the media?
Michael Salter, Organised Sexual Abuse
allegations, britain, child-abuse, child-sexual-abuse, confabulation, contempt, denial, disinformation, epidemic, false-allegations, hype, hyperbole, hysteria, jean-la-fontaine, journalists, mass-media, media, misinformation, misrepresentations, moral-panic, nazis, organized-abuse, report, ritual-abuse, ritual-abuse-myth, ritualistic-abuse, satanic-panic, satanic-ritual-abuse, scapegoating, sceptics, sensationalism, sexual-abuse, skeptics, social-workers, society-denial, therapists