No, the way the world is today, and the sexual dimorphism of today, is fine. Women don't need to be stronger, because firearms exist, which is a substitute for strength and aggression. If this was 1000 A.D., and swords and axes were all a woman could use to supplement her strength, maybe I'd agree. Women are already fully capable of being territorial and sexually aggressive, but the strength part is a no-go. Physical weakness means they need to be protected, grug likes idea of protecting vulnerable lady who has cool gun, like your pic-related. <|endoftext|> 