No they aren't lmao, the zoomer literally says that you can't interpret the Bible without a certain grammatical/critical/whatever hermeneutical approach as a response to the brainlet Grug. Because apparently asking for a reinterpretation of the Scriptures in light of modern social sciences by application of not only textual criticism, but pivotally, the *historical-critical method* and other cool shit like that as a response to drooling Grug's blatant literalism, that's midwit-tier compared to televangelical-tier regress to that same kind of literalism with a few extra steps mixed in. <|endoftext|> 