Scientific Vice-Presidents
Kaiser Wilhelm Society
Researching and processing the past
Max Planck - Revolutionary against his will
Yearbook Highlights
Administration & Offices
Administrative Headquarters
Central Gender Equality Officer
Supporting Max Planck
Scientific Members
Centrally Funded Projects
Cooperation with Fraunhofer
Lise Meitner Groups
Research Groups at Universities
Awards to Max Planck Scientists
Japan Prize
Fields Medal
Lasker Award
Leibniz Prize
Awards of the Max Planck Society
Max Planck-Humboldt Research Award
Harnack Medal
Awards for Junior Scientists
Research and society
Max Planck Innovation
Jobboard
Gender-equal career development
Public sector employer
Services & Administration
First steps to Max Planck
Bachelor Students
Research Group Leaders
Lise Meitner Excellence Program
Alumni Representatives
HR Development & Opportunities
Max Planck worldwide
Post from...
Max Planck Centres
Dioscuri Programme
Country Portals
Global warming - don't blame the plants
International scientific team reacts to misinterpretation of their research results and provides the correct perspective
In a recent study (Nature, 12 January 2006), scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Utrecht University, Netherlands, and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for Northern Ireland, UK, revealed that plants produce the greenhouse gas methane. First estimates indicated that this could account for a significant proportion of methane in the atmosphere. There has been extended media coverage of this work with unfortunately, in many instances, a misinterpretation of the findings. Furthermore, the discovery led to intense speculations on the potential relevance of the findings for reforestation programs in the framework of the Kyoto protocol. These issues need to be put in the right perspective.
The most frequent misinterpretation we find in the media is that emissions of methane from plants are responsible for global warming. As those emissions from plants are a natural source, they have existed long before man's influence started to impact upon the composition of the atmosphere. It is the anthropogenic emissions which are responsible for the well-documented increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane since pre-industrial times. Emissions from plants thus contribute to the natural greenhouse effect and not to the recent temperature increase known as 'global warming'. Even if land use practices have altered plant methane emissions, which we did not demonstrate, this would also count as an anthropogenic source, and the plants themselves cannot be deemed responsible.
Furthermore, our discovery led to intense speculation that methane emissions by plants could diminish or even outweigh the carbon storage effect of reforestation programs with important implications for the Kyoto protocol, where such programs are to be used in national carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction strategies. We first stress that our findings are preliminary with regard to the methane emission strength. Emissions most certainly depend on plant type and environmental conditions and more experiments are certainly necessary to quantify the process under natural conditions. As a first rough estimate of the order of magnitude we have taken the global average methane emissions as representative to provide a rough estimate of its potential effect on climate. These estimates (for details, see below) show that methane emissions by plants may slightly diminish the effect of reforestation programs. However, the climatic benefits gained through carbon sequestration by reforestation far exceed the relatively small negative effect, which may reduce the carbon uptake effect by up to 4 per cent. Thus, the potential for reduction of global warming by planting trees is most definitely positive. The fundamental problem still remaining is the global large-scale anthropogenic burning of fossil fuels.
Details of calculations used:
In our study, we have linked global methane emission estimates to plant growth, which is generally quantified as net primary productivity (NPP). On a global basis NPP amounts to ~62 x 1015 g of carbon/yr, which corresponds to an uptake of 227 x 1015 g of CO2/yr. On the emission side, our study suggests annual global methane emissions by plants of 62-236 x 1012 g/yr CH4. Thus, for each kg of CO2 assimilated by a plant roughly 0.25 to 1 to 4 g of CH4 is released. During growth of a new forest, up to 50% of plant tissue is lost again in the short term through decomposition of plant litter of leaves and roots [1]. This then doubles the estimate to 0.5 to 2 g methane emitted per kg of CO2 assimilated and stored in plants for longer periods. Over a 100-year horizon, the global warming potential of methane is ~20 times higher than that of carbon dioxide. Thus, for climate, the benefits gained by reforestation programs would be lessened by between 1 and 4 per cent due to methane emissions from the plants themselves.
Thomas Röckmann1,2, Jack Hamilton3, Frank Keppler2 and Marc Brass1,2
1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
3 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
Science Magazine
Images of Science
Dr. Frank Keppler
Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg +49 6221 516-575 frank.keppler@mpi-hd.mpg.de
Prof. Thomas Röckmann
+31 30 253-3858 t.roeckmann@phys.uu.nl
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, The Netherlands
Schulze, Beck, Müller-Hohenstein; Plant Ecology (Springer Verlag, 2005)
Publication references
Frank Keppler, John T. G. Hamilton, Marc Brass and Thomas Röckmann
Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions
Nature, January 12, 2006
Keyword Collection
Receive notifications for English content
Receive notifications for German content