and M. Nelkin, ''Current noise and long time tails in biased disordered random walks,'' J. Stat. Phys. 36,1 5-29 (1984). This is in accord with our ﬁnding that stimuli with expo-nents below 0. 5 appear to move in a jittery fashion, whereasexponents above 0. 5 move smoothly. 30. In an interesting experiment Snippe and Koenderink stud-ied human ability to perceive correlations between mem-bers of a row of light sources. Positive correlations be-tween two lights were detected as apparent motion, but thecorresponding anticorrelation between the same two lightswas undetectable as motion. H. P. Snipe and J. J. Koen-derink, ''Detection of noise-like luminance functions,'' Per-cept. Psychophys. 55,2 8-41 (1994). 31. One oddity of random motion is that the visual system does not seem to be able to compensate for motion blur forstimuli undergoing Brownian motion. S. N. J. Watama-niuk, ''Visual persistence is reduced by ﬁxed-trajectory mo-tion but not random motion,'' Perception 21, 791-802 (1992). No one has yet studied deblurring for anticorre-lated (antipersistent) motion. 32. W. D. Wright, ''The graphical representation of small color differences,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33, 632-636 (1943). 33. D. L. Mac Adam, ''Visual sensitivity to color differences in daylight,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. 32,2 4 7-274 (1942). 34. L. Silberstein and D. L. Mac Adam, ''The distribution of color matchings around a color center,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. 35, 32-39 (1945). 35. W. R. J. Brown and D. L. Mac Adam, ''Visual sensitivities to combined chromaticity and luminance differences,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. 39, 808-834 (1949). 36. R. F. Voss and J. Clarke, ''1/ fnoise in music: music from 1/fnoise,'' J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 258-263 (1978). Billock et al. Vol. 18, No. 10/October 2001/J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2413