qid
int64
1
194k
question
stringlengths
46
29.5k
answers
listlengths
2
32
date
stringlengths
10
10
metadata
listlengths
3
3
1
<p>I would like to open the meta discussion on the criteria for closing. I think we should be a little more open than the rest of the SE community when it comes to questions that are </p> <ul> <li><strong>Localized</strong>: academics travel a lot. Something that is localized today may not be localized for us tomorrow. I worked in 7 different countries since I started and I am still not done.</li> <li><strong>"List-like" or "opinionated"</strong>: there are topics that may involve a list of options, and often, academia is not a "this way" kind of answers. Occasionally, there may be things that you have to agglomerate from different sources, in order to get a "better strategy". I am thinking, for example, about best practices for visas, which may favor different inputs from different people having different backgrounds. The "correct" answer may come from someone that is unmarried, and another answer from someone that is married. The first answer may not be useful to a future reader, but the second one will. It's the usual "bad subjective/good subjective" I think.</li> </ul> <p>Opinions? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 20279, "author": "agarza", "author_id": 23193, "author_profile": "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/23193", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The recommended hardware for OctoPi is <a href=\"https://octoprint.org/download/\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\"...
2012/02/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5/" ]
8
<p>In reference to <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49/what-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-being-a-professor">this question</a> about being a professor, this is impossible to answer within the context of how SE wants us to answer questions. There's no definite answer, and even more so, there's no "right" answer. That being said, the question is valid, and probably fairly common. Should we allow that sort of question here?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 9, "author": "dmahr", "author_id": 37, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/37", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>Based on the <a href=\"http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617?phase=definition\">example questions asked in th...
2012/02/15
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
12
<p>This particular SE has the significant problem that many answers will be "soft" in nature; there's no real literature on much of this, making many questions answerable only through "in my experience..." answers. <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/90/73">This answer</a> is a fine example of this... the answer may be correct, but only for a certain subset of the interested population, and there may not even <em>be</em> a "definitively correct" answer. That last point is the major problem... many of these questions will not have a definitive answer, but the "soft" answers will often do the job of addressing the question. <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39/73">This question about seminar attendance</a> is similar... there's no real answer, but there are a few conjecture-type answers that seem to satisfactorily address the question. </p> <p>So, how should we deal with "soft" answers to questions that demand them?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 13, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I know I'm answering my own question, but I want to put forth the argument that <strong>these style answers should ...
2012/02/15
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
17
<p>By looking at the site today, it seems that "higher education" is an euphemism for "doctorate". The definition stage however doesn't imply that (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia/16618#16618">1</a> <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia/16618#16618">2</a> <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia/22982#22982">3</a>...)</p> <p>Is Academia only about PhD, postdoc and teaching positions? Are questions about Master's, Bachelor's, High School etc. off-topic?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 18, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I would not define \"higher education\" as including high school. The usual definition includes college and above ...
2012/02/15
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/17", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/24/" ]
21
<p>Based on my answer in <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/13/73">this question</a>, I propose that we modify the tag placeholder text (currently "at least one tag (graduate-school note-taking science), max 5 tags") to strongly encourage the poster to provide a tag identifying the field of research being discussed:</p> <blockquote> <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/FP3rz.png" alt="proposed text: &quot;must include field of research (american-history mechanical-engineering), up to four other relevant tags&quot;"></p> </blockquote> <p>The proposed text is:</p> <blockquote> <p>must include field of research (american-history mechanical-engineering), max 5 tags</p> </blockquote> <p>My rationale for this change is that if the poster does not provide the field of research, 9 times out of 10 they will be asked for it in the comments immediately after posting. If they don't, then 9 times out of 10 the answer they receive will be too broad to actually help them. (I'm noticing that most people - myself included - don't realize how many fields of research there are.)</p>
[ { "answer_id": 28, "author": "Andy W", "author_id": 3, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/3", "pm_score": 3, "selected": true, "text": "<p>While the experience of individuals will be mostly limited to one particular field and likely a specific geographic are...
2012/02/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
23
<p>I would vouch for accommodation questions to be on-topic, as long as they are clearly focused for academic hosting (that is, "Channels for accommodation for 6 months at VU-Amsterdam" is on-topic, "Looking for accommodation in Centralia, Pennsylvania" is not). Also, direct "Does anybody here have a room available from/to? write me at" are completely off-topic.</p> <p>The focus is to give <em>tools</em>, not <em>solutions</em> to the problem. The tools will stay valid and useful to other readers in the future. The "I have a room, write me" will not.</p> <p>The reason is that relocation and quick finding of accommodation channels for short term rentals is a complete and necessary part of the academic lifestyle. Very, very often, the universities provide little or no facilities or preferred contacts for such task. Networking, unknown but dedicated services, local traditions, safest channels (e.g. commercial vs. private) on this regard is a necessity we have to endure as much as we have to endure applying for grants. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 27, "author": "Henry", "author_id": 8, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/8", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>There's a narrow line between \"how does a person find short-term housing near such-and-such university\" and \"does an...
2012/02/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/23", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5/" ]
24
<p>This site should be pretty easy to publicize; simply post flyers around the various departments. Would someone with design skills be willing to throw together a flyer to be around the various campuses by Academia SE users?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 33, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I have some design skills. I suggest that people should think of (and post as answers) some things that could be ...
2012/02/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/24", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
36
<p>In order to promote the site, it would be good to post a notification on some of the existing online forums where academics congregate.</p> <ul> <li>What online forums exist?</li> </ul> <p>As side points</p> <ul> <li>What community does the forum contain? How big is the community?</li> <li>What rules exist regarding promoting other site in the community?</li> </ul> <p>By way of example: </p> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicPsychology/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicPsychology/</a> contains almost 2000 subscribers; Reddit permits posting links; links that the community likes get upvoted and then receive greater exposure.</li> </ul>
[ { "answer_id": 43, "author": "InquilineKea", "author_id": 77, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/77", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=139\" rel=\"nofollow\">Physics Forums</a>. Ch...
2012/02/21
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/62/" ]
39
<p>We have a new user who is being more disruptive than helpful:</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/323/what-makes-an-undergradute-in-computer-science-with-a-1-2-degree-more-employable">First question</a></p> <p>The initial question was not ideal for SE, so people voted it down and to close it. That sparked outrage and:</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/339/use-of-stackexchange-looking-for-answer">Second "question," closer to a rant</a></p> <p>What is supposed to be done about users doing this? Are they supposed to be flagged as spammers? Is something else supposed to be done about that?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 40, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It's a good question, I was also wondering what one can do. In my experience on some forums, the best to do is us...
2012/02/22
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/39", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53/" ]
45
<p>I'm wondering whether we should loosen the criterion for "too localized" in this forum. My intuition is that many questions on this forum will be very localized, but the answers will be more general in nature. For instance, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/363/career-advice-for-a-recent-social-psychology-graduate">this question</a> about social psychology + art seems very localized, but the answers will probably be relevant to both social psychology <em>and</em> art majors, rather than only the intersection of the two. I think this will be a common phenomenon. In fact, I can't really think up with a good case of "too localized" for our forum. <strong>Should we avoid closing questions as "too localized" at all?</strong></p>
[ { "answer_id": 47, "author": "Fomite", "author_id": 118, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/118", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>In my mind, it should at least be possible for someone searching the site a month from now to find it helpful. It's...
2012/02/22
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/45", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
55
<p>When I saw this new StackExchange site, it first reminded me a lot of a tool that's being used in an increasing number of college-level courses called <a href="https://piazza.com/" rel="nofollow">Piazza</a>. Each "instance" of Piazza is a single semester of a single course offered at a university where students can ask questions and other students (or the course instructor) can create a "wiki-style" answer.</p> <p>Having been a user of it for a year, it has some terrible shortcomings (questions are sorted only by the date their originally posted, making useful threads terribly difficult to find; formatting of posts are limited to a small set of HTML; etc) that StackExchange has usually found elegant solutions.</p> <p>This may be the wrong place to start this discussion, though it would be great to see StackExchange offer a service as a Piazza alternative. It would seem the current Academia software already exceeds the functionality of Piazza, it would simply need to be instanced for courses to have the ability to adopt it. Is this something we could expect in the future?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 47, "author": "Fomite", "author_id": 118, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/118", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>In my mind, it should at least be possible for someone searching the site a month from now to find it helpful. It's...
2012/02/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/55", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/260/" ]
60
<p>I was wondering whether we should allow questions about academics searching for industry positions. <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/441/what-opportunities-exist-in-the-industry-for-a-researcher-in-computational-astro">This question on jobs outside of academia</a> was closed, based on our brand-new FAQ, but I thought the question was a good one. <strong>Do we want to allow those sorts of questions here?</strong> This would include questions about...</p> <ul> <li>Which industries may be a good match for a particular field of researchers</li> <li>Networking with industry while in academia</li> <li>Any questions from non-research master's students</li> </ul> <p>I personally (and quite biased-ly) feel that this is relevant to academicians, as the move from research to industry is quite common, and it is something many academicians will want to know about. What's your thoughts?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 62, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Certainly not. There's a risk as it is that there are several posters treating this site as a careers advice forum...
2012/02/26
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/60", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
64
<p>I've noticed that it's only possible to mention another SE user using the "@" symbol in a comment thread where the user appears, and I was wondering if it was a feature or a bug. In particular, I couldn't find any easy to refer to another member, or just to draw the attention of another member to a particular question. Similarly, on <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/51/proposed-faq-what-kind-of-questions-should-i-not-ask-here-entry">this question</a>, eykanal mentioned my name in a comment, but I didn't receive any message, although I would have liked to. </p> <p>I know that the point of SE is not to create a mail platform, and clearly there should be some kind of regulations, but I wouldn't mind indicating a list of users who can "refer" me (or say, put a default level of reputation), so that I don't miss out a potentially interesting question. </p> <p>I don't know if such a mechanism already exists, but somehow it could be nice (with an opt-in mechanism, so that by default, nobody can refer to you). </p>
[ { "answer_id": 65, "author": "Adam Lear", "author_id": 23, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/23", "pm_score": 3, "selected": true, "text": "<p>There are no plans right now to introduce any sort of notification feature along these lines. Stack Exchange is by...
2012/02/26
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/64", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
72
<p>Many of the current answers begin with "It depends on your field" / "There is no one answer". Indeed, each field is unique, although they share common grounds.</p> <p>For questions that depend on the specific field, I would expect to see <strong>many</strong> answers, each for its own field, rather than having an answer that says "it varies" and that only gives a brief description of the common grounds.</p> <p>For instance, for the question</p> <blockquote> <p>Should I publish my recent result in a journal or a conference?</p> </blockquote> <p>I would expect to see</p> <ul> <li><strong>Anser A</strong>: "In CS, conferences are very important and you should publish there (and then submit the ful version to a journal"</li> <li><strong>Answer B</strong>: "In our field, , there are no serious conferences, thus one should aim for journals..."</li> </ul> <p>(see also <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/58/including-country-region-and-discipline-in-qa-for-which-it-is-relevant">this related question</a>)</p> <p>Do you agree with this paradigm? How do we lead the community to avoid "it depends on your field" kind of answers and replace them with "In field XXXX, the answer is.."?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 191, "author": "userJT", "author_id": 1537, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1537", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think we should allow domain specific questions and cultivate domains within this server. </p>\n\n<p>we shoul...
2012/03/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/324/" ]
73
<p>I'm relatively new to Stack Exchange, so I'm not sure if there is a universal policy for closing questions across sites. But I've noticed here that there are questions with low or negative scores or questions that are similar to ones asked and answered before, and they're left hanging on the front page. Turnover seems slow compared to other SE sites. </p> <p>I just wanted to put this out for discussion, I don't have a terribly strong opinion about it either way. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 74, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It's a good remark. In general, I think it can be good to leave the time for the OP to reformulate the question b...
2012/03/06
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/73", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/167/" ]
83
<p>Since we're about two weeks into the public beta now, I would think that it would be time to start considering adding more moderators (right now, I believe Anna is the only moderator, and she's with SE, as opposed to being a member-moderator.</p> <p>Is it time to begin the process of adding <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/07/moderator-pro-tempore/"><em>pro tempore</em> moderators</a>? I think it would help improve board "flow", and keep things moving in a more productive direction.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 84, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p><strong>Yes</strong>. This community, while still small, has had it's share of low-quality questions and trolls, an...
2012/03/07
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/83", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53/" ]
94
<p>How can we fix <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/842/should-a-postdoc-obey-when-is-asked-to-do-things-she-knows-little-about">this question</a> to be more focused on helping postdocs and less argumentative and provocative?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 84, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p><strong>Yes</strong>. This community, while still small, has had it's share of low-quality questions and trolls, an...
2012/03/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/94", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
99
<p>I note that this question implicitly prefers questions with a general topic but in fact very localized content (one's life story + a question of type 'What should I do?').</p> <p>For example, one I asked a general question (i.e. if one can use his/her personal e-mail instead of institutional) then it was pointed out that in fact there were such question before (as a side part of a compound/story type question). </p> <p>AFAIK it is not a good practice for a SE site.</p> <p>First, it makes things less reusable. </p> <ul> <li>An answered question makes less sense to others.</li> <li>It is harder to find.</li> </ul> <p>Second, it makes harder to make meaningful answers.</p> <ul> <li>If there are more subquestions and answer covering only some may be accepted.</li> <li>As a specific context is given, the answer may not be true in a more general one.</li> </ul>
[ { "answer_id": 84, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p><strong>Yes</strong>. This community, while still small, has had it's share of low-quality questions and trolls, an...
2012/03/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/99", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
111
<p>We've had a couple questions since the dawn of Academia.SE asking for advice about undergraduate-related topics, the most recent being <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1407/73">this well-formulated and generally pretty solid question</a>. In the past, we've <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/38/73">discouraged these kinds of questions</a>. That was a while ago, though, and we've matured as a forum since then. Given how many upvotes the current question has received in such a short time, I'm curious what the community's current view is on undergraduate-related questions; should we continue to discourage them or should we allow them?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 112, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>You make a good point. For me, what I really want to avoid, are questions like: \"I like this and that, what pro...
2012/05/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/111", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
115
<p>I would love to ask a question on the tenure system that is in vogue in US. I see a few publications in Google, and also a few blog posts talking about the pros and cons of the system. </p> <p>I wish to know the following:</p> <ul> <li>Is the tenure system efficient as such?</li> <li>Is it likely/probable/possible that it will get overhauled in the near/far future?</li> <li>Why do we not have an annual incentive-based system (or something similar) instead of tenure? </li> <li>Are there universities which have begun to do away with tenure already?</li> </ul> <p>I am a bit doubtful if these questions are permissible or if they belong to community-wiki or if they belong at all. Most importantly I am afraid the answers may result in camps of people. Any idea how I should approach this? Thanks :)</p> <p>PS: First post in meta, excuse me if I am not supposed to ask this here.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 116, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think that all of this discussion will fit in very well into most academic discussion forums. It's a discussion...
2012/05/08
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/115", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
118
<p>I was looking over our stats on area 51, and we're doing poorly on two counts: #questions/day and number of visits. I'm more concerned about the latter than the former for now (because fixing the latter will probably fix the former). </p> <p>I was hoping this could become an open thread for ideas on how to boost the visit numbers, so we don't go the way of econ.SE and theoreticalphysics.SE. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 119, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It's a good question, I've been also wondering what we could do about increasing the number of visits. We've had...
2012/05/10
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/118", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/346/" ]
123
<p>You love your site and we love your site, but there is a whole world of people out there who might not even know it exists. When they do find it, their first impression will either scare them away or keep them around. Given this, let's take a hard look at the questions and answers here and make sure newcomers see the site at its best!</p> <p>Below you'll find ten questions randomly selected from this site. What do you think about each of them and their answers? Are they the best they can be or can they be improved? Would they look interesting and inviting to an outsider or are they a little embarrassing?</p> <p>Upvote the corresponding post here on meta when we're awesome. Downvote when our content just isn't quite up to par.</p> <p>Oh, and do comment to let everyone know your thoughts and take part in this conversation. :)</p>
[ { "answer_id": 124, "author": "Adam Lear", "author_id": 23, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/23", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p><a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1051/what-do-principal-investigators-pis-look-for-in-pros...
2012/05/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/123", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/23/" ]
138
<p>I've noticed that many of the <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/first-posts">recent questions asked by newcomers to the site</a> are low quality and/or off-topic, dealing with &quot;what's the best university for discipline X?&quot; and &quot;how can I get into field/program X&quot;? On a similarly worrying note, there have not been any new users asking more academic-related questions, such as those asked by site regulars. To me, this suggests that we are attracting the wrong kinds of users, and we are <em>not</em> attracting the kinds of users we want. My interpretation of the data is that we are attracting typical SO users, who make up a very diverse (and typically non-academic) population, and we are not marketing this site well enough to the general academic crowd.</p> <p>My question is, what do you think of this? Do you agree? If so, what should we do to fix this? If you disagree, what do you make of the trend?</p> <hr /> <p>In response to the comment below:</p> <ol> <li><p><strong><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1884/what-academic-discipline-does-productivity-science-come-under">What academic discipline does “Productivity Science” come under?</a></strong></p> <p>This question is completely unrelated to Academia and is unlikely to benefit any future readers of this site.</p> </li> <li><p><strong><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1992/how-can-i-make-up-for-weak-grades-while-applying-for-a-masters">How can I make up for weak grades while applying for a masters?</a></strong></p> <p>This question is almost impossible to answer. Sure, it's common, but there are far too many factors for a definitive answer.</p> </li> <li><p><strong><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1989/part-time-non-degree-computer-science-studies">Part-time/non-degree computer science studies</a></strong></p> <p>Off-topic, as it pertains to undergraduate work.</p> </li> <li><p><strong><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1987/how-to-get-enrolled-in-a-german-university-for-ph-d-in-computer-science">How to get enrolled in a German university for Ph.D. in computer science</a></strong></p> <p>This type of question is the most dangerous, because the information is freely available on department pages of individual programs. Many questions like this here will significantly decrease the value of this site, as all answers will be &quot;check <a href="http://example.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> link&quot; and &quot;-1, check department webpage&quot;.</p> </li> </ol> <p>We have had some very good questions recently (e.g., <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2067/paper-reprints-of-articles">this</a>, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1999/how-does-a-faculty-member-get-to-work-at-two-universities-or-more">this</a>, and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/849/can-i-pursue-a-phd-while-working-as-an-instructor-lecturer">this</a>), but of those three, two were asked by &quot;old&quot; site members, while only one was a newbie. My main worry is that new folks are viewing the site differently than we are, and that the way they're viewing it isn't good for our long-term health.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 139, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I agree that there has been several low quality questions recently, but I guess it's a combination between the f...
2012/06/12
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/138", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
144
<p>Well this question is bound to be controversial. What should we do?</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2113/319">What is being done to make the academic environment more women friendly?</a></p>
[ { "answer_id": 145, "author": "Suresh", "author_id": 346, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/346", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>My feeling (mentioned in comments) is that the second part of the question (asking for references to work studyin...
2012/06/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/144", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/319/" ]
149
<p>As a followup to DQdlM's <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/104/are-questions-on-pedagogy-on-topic">question about pedagogy</a>, are questions about student recruitment, success, or retention on topic even if they are not related to curriculum development or instructional design?</p> <p>For example:<br> My institution does a little general recruitment. Most recruitment is handled in the academic departments. I am not a college recruiter. I assume that research has been done on targeting and recruiting students who are likely to be successful, but since my research background is in chemistry, I do not even know where to begin looking for this kind of information. Would a question on locating resources on recruiting undergraduate students be on-topic?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 150, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I would definitely imagine this is on-topic. It's related to academia and specific to academics. I would suggest t...
2012/06/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/149", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/924/" ]
152
<p>I've just been to the stats of travel.SE and I found their stats phenomenally better than ours. While 8 questions and 1800 visits per day is excellent, I do think that some part of this has to do with the objective of the site: academia is much more exclusive than travel; in other words, all academics can have travel queries at some point of time, but some or many travellers may never get academia-related queries.</p> <p>This is the basis of my question: how sound is it to judge different SE sites based on the same set of criteria? Should A.SE shoot for the same targets as others?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 153, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>According to the SE \"targets\" A.SE is currently weak in questions per day (4.6/15) and visits per day (448/1...
2012/07/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/152", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
157
<p>In this <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/2545/929">answer</a>, the user has decided to provide a evidence for what makes him qualified for answering the question. While I can see it as potentially useful, I am not sure it is needed or desirable. Has the practice of prefacing answers with qualifications been discussed?</p> <p>My concern is that providing qualifications could intimidate junior people. It seems like such statements are saying "I am so important that my answers should be given extra weight". I think our site rep (and past question/answers) should give the indication of the type of person who submitted the answer and how much extra weight the answer should be given (if any).</p>
[ { "answer_id": 158, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think that for this particular answer, it's quite similar to many other ones, where the answerer starts with \...
2012/07/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/157", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
163
<p>I was going to ask a question about graduation and I didn't find the tag I was looking for. I was thinking that an "events" tag would be useful for questions about different events that academics go to (e.g., graduation, new student invocation, thesis defenses, fund raising).</p> <p><strong>EDIT</strong> In response to aeismail's answer, I am thinking of questions more from the faculty side of these events and not the student side, although student side questions would also work. For example a question about etiquette when walking in the graduation procession as a member of faculty.</p> <p>What do people think about an EVENTS tag with a description of</p> <blockquote> <p>about what can be expected of and by attendees at different academic events including graduation, thesis defenses, and tenure review meetings.</p> </blockquote>
[ { "answer_id": 164, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Perhaps \"milestones\" is a more appropriate tag than \"events?\" It's a better descriptor, at any rate. \"Events...
2012/08/03
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/163", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
168
<p>I am thinking specifically of <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2772/are-there-any-specific-teaching-techniques-to-handle-virtual-classroom-session#comment4504_2772">this question</a>, where my answer would be wholly different based on the type of virtual teaching environment. I would like to provide separate answers for each environment so that they can be evaluated (and voted on) separately. Some answers may be more useful than others. </p> <p>I know that I have the ability to provide more than one answer to a question. If the two answers are substantively different, is that preferable to a single long, rambling answer of the type "In situation A, do this, ............ and in situation B..... this other thing"?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 670, "author": "Hesham ELMAHDY", "author_id": 9033, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/9033", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The vote is done to the answer as a whole. You would probably get higher votes for a more complete answ...
2012/08/12
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/168", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/924/" ]
171
<p>I know that the site stats (on the left side of the front page) include visitors/day. I'm guessing that is averaged over some time frame. Is there a place that I can see the number of visitors on each particular day?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 172, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Unfortunately, they don't make that data public. The number you see is pretty good for gauging trends, though. </p...
2012/08/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/171", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1069/" ]
174
<p>Are questions on software on topic?</p> <p>This question on <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3054/openoffice-vs-libreoffice-vs-msoffice-for-academic-writing">writing software</a> seems almost identical to questions on <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1880/software-to-use-for-creating-posters-for-academic-conferences">poster</a>, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1095/software-to-draw-illustrative-figures-in-papers">illustration</a>, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1085/software-app-for-electronic-research-notebooks">notebook</a>, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36/how-do-the-various-citations-management-software-programs-compare">citation</a>, and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1098/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-software-used-for-data-analysis-by-scientific">data analysis</a> software. The citation and data analysis questions were closed. All but the data analysis questions are highly voted.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 175, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>As I stated <a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2993/73\">here</a>, I think software questions are defi...
2012/08/31
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/174", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
180
<p>In <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3086/opportunities-in-industry-after-a-phd-in-organic-chemistry">this question</a>, the OP wants to know the opportunities in industrial R&amp;D after a PhD in organic chemistry. In general, industry vacancies and requirements do not have anything to do with academia, so Charles has rightly cast his vote to close the question.</p> <p>But on a previous date, we have enthusiastically answered <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96/what-kind-of-opportunities-exist-in-the-industry-for-someone-with-a-ph-d-in-theo?rq=1">this question</a>, which asks almost the same question for CS. </p> <p>How do we decide if a particular question asking about industrial R&amp;D opportunities for PhD and post-doc scholars is on-topic or not? Asking about software jobs after MS is obviously out of scope, but aren't professors in academia better informed than most about research opportunities? Shouldn't we give a concession to questions about industrial R&amp;D after PhD/post-doc alone? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 182, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": -1, "selected": false, "text": "<p><strong>No.</strong> Questions about careers outside academia should be off-topic.</p>\n\n<p>They're suitable to...
2012/09/05
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/180", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
181
<p>I saw <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/190453/is-it-morally-right-and-pedagogically-right-to-google-answers-to-homework">a question</a> on the ethic of googling one's homework. The questioner, though having posted it on Math.SE, asks about the "pedagogical" merit of doing the same. This question has been closed as <strong>not constructive</strong> on Math.SE, but many would opine it is off-topic as well.</p> <p>Does the question belong here? The way it is phrased may refer to math problems, but it is an issue that is certainly faced by most professors and students. A (kind of) compelementary question on how a professor should keep himself ahead of the homework-googling menace has been asked by Dave <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1705/setting-exercises-and-assignments-when-everything-is-on-the-web">here</a>.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 183, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": true, "text": "<p>Funny you bring this one up; they had asked us whether we wanted it, and I turned it down as being too pedagogical....
2012/09/05
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/181", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
188
<p>Are questions that are US-specific on-topic on this site? (i.e., only relevant to academia in the United States)</p> <p>(Do people want to see those kinds of questions tagged or marked in any particular way?)</p>
[ { "answer_id": 189, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>Yes, these questions are fine. As of now we're not tagging these questions specifically as such; just indicate the ...
2012/09/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/188", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/705/" ]
201
<p>Some users create tags while adding question; some are highly useful and some are simply meaningless. Do SE have any mechanism to encourage users to add tag wiki as well, on creating tags?</p> <p>Esp. see this question <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3022/in-conference-review-process-what-do-author-response-and-author-notification">In conference review process, what do “author response” and “author notification” mean?</a> What actually the tags (<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/wording/info">wording</a>) (<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/dates/info">dates</a>) (<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/call/info">call</a>) mean?</p> <p>So, if the tag creator him(her)self propose a tag wiki, it is good for the community.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 202, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": true, "text": "<p>I don't think there is a way to \"encourage\" a tag creator to edit the tag wiki. However, you can retag the ques...
2012/10/02
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/201", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1580/" ]
205
<p><strong>What is this community’s take on deleting closed questions? What are the criteria for deletion?</strong></p> <p>In the past few days, I have voted on deleting some of the closed questions that seemed to have absolutely no value to the site (<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3203/extraction-of-jpegs-of-slides-from-a-video-recording-of-a-lecture">way off-topic</a>, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3534/need-help-working-through-the-pros-cons-of-two-schools">way too localized</a>, that kind of stuff). I do it on other sites, as part of the “janitorial” activities of high-rep users.</p> <p>The questions gathered no other delete vote, so I flagged a few others (e.g., <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1845/njit-vs-university-of-oklahoma-health-sciences-center">here</a> and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1153/java-developer-or-sap-softwares">there</a>). The mods declined to delete, saying “there's no need to flag a question as low-quality if it's already been closed”.</p> <p>So, I wonder: does this site have a deliberate policy of not deleting these very low quality closed questions? Argument has been made in other parts of the SE network, including by the SE team itself, that deletion is the final destination of many closed questions. For example, see <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/the-stack-overflow-question-lifecycle/">here</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Why would you <em>delete</em> a question? Isn’t closing it enough?</p> <ul> <li>Some questions are of such poor quality that they cannot be salvaged. They’re literally nonsense. Not every byte of data that is created in the world is infinite and sacred.</li> <li>Some questions are so incredibly off topic that they add no value to a programming community.</li> <li>The mental cost of processing these closed questions is not zero, particularly for users who are actively engaged and scanning questions to find things they can help answer.</li> <li>If users see a lot of closed questions, they’ll note that we don’t enforce the guidelines, so why should they? Without any final resolution, asking questions that get closed becomes something we are implicitly encouraging — a broken windows problem. If this goes on for long enough, we’re no longer a community of programmers who ask and answer programming questions, we’re a community of random people discussing.. whatever. That’s toxic.</li> <li>If enough of these closed questions are allowed to hang around, they become clutter that reduces the overall signal to noise ratio — which further reduces confidence in the system.</li> </ul> </blockquote> <p>Or see <a href="https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4058/24799">there</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Closed questions should be kept on the site when:</p> <ol> <li>They are a duplicate of another on topic question. As there are many ways of asking the same question it's good that we have the different examples on the site.</li> <li>....</li> </ol> <p>Well that's it really.</p> </blockquote> <p>I could see no meta post on the topic, hence I create one. <strong>When does the community feel it is appropriate to delete closed questions?</strong></p>
[ { "answer_id": 206, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>There are three main types of deletions that I personally have made:</p>\n\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https://academia.m...
2012/10/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/205", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
211
<p>Following up on our recent discussion <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/205/what-should-happen-to-closed-questions">on closed questions</a>, I'm wondering if it might not be a bad idea to create a tag for closed questions. This might help us to "corral" them a bit better.</p> <p>Thoughts?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 212, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>That's a good idea, I was actually looking for a way to search only for closed questions. </p>\n\n<p>EDIT: The k...
2012/10/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/211", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53/" ]
215
<p>There has been some discussion recently here about deletion. What I could suggest, in order to avoid having one question here for each content we might want to delete, is to post as an answer to this question any other questions, answer or comment one would like to delete.</p> <p><strong>If you have at least 2000 reputation</strong>, you can directly vote on posts for deletion: please do so as appropriate. You will also be able to see <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools?tab=delete&amp;daterange=last30days">recent posts that have accrued some delete votes</a>: click on the <code>most votes</code> and <code>recent votes</code> headings to see them all.</p> <p><strong>If you do not have at least 2000 reputation</strong>, then please vote on the proposed deletions below: An upvote on the answer means that the post should be deleted, a negative one means that the post shouldn't. All comments are welcome. By default, if after a few days, there has not been any comment <em>against</em> deletion, the post will be deleted. </p> <p>What do you think of such a process? It can also allow to keep track of the deletion, and the reason pro/against. Furthermore, it would move some parts of the deletion discussion from the hidden mod room to a more open space. </p> <p>As F'x pointed out, good candidates for deletion can be found <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&amp;q=-%22possible%20duplicate%3a%22%20migrated%3a0%20closed%3a1">here</a></p>
[ { "answer_id": 217, "author": "Noble P. Abraham", "author_id": 1580, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1580", "pm_score": -1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>A rhetorical question <a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3690/what-is-irdam-jour...
2012/10/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/215", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
238
<p>Stack Exchange sites that have graduated run so-called “Community Promotion Ads”: these run in the right sidebar of each page, and are designated according to votes on the Meta of each site. For example, see <a href="https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/980/community-promotion-ads-2012">on Physics.SE</a> how it works.</p> <p>The good thing about these ads is that the new visitors they bring are, for the most part, already users on other Stack Exchange sites, and they now how the system works. Over at <a href="http://chemistry.stackexchange.com">Chemistry</a>, we have <a href="https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1334/91">placed an ad on Physics.SE</a> and it does bring us some traffic.</p> <p><strong>I’d like to propose that we come up with an ad to run on our sibling SE sites</strong>. I see three points to deal with:</p> <ul> <li>finding a nice motto or a catchy sentence</li> <li>creating the ad itself (having a nice graphics improves one’s click-through rate, but it's not absolutely necessary)</li> <li>coming up with a list of sites we want to target: I’m thinking <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/">Mathematics</a>, <a href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/">Physics</a>, <a href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/">Theoretical Computer Science</a>, <a href="https://tex.stackexchange.com/">TeX - LaTeX</a>, <a href="https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/">Mathematica</a>, <a href="http://english.stackexchange.com">English L&amp;U</a>, <a href="https://electronics.stackexchange.com/">Electrical Engineering</a> (sorted roughly in decreasing order of suitability IMO)</li> </ul> <p>What do you think?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 239, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": -1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It's a good idea to plan. But the problem is technically we haven't graduated yet. We're still in beta mode. We ...
2012/10/21
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
245
<p>When tagging this question: <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/4930/344">How can I apply to be an adjunct faculty?</a>, I came across four tags that could either be synonyms or at least have more distinct definitions.</p> <p>To be clear, I think that these could either be merged into two or even one tag with synonyms.</p> <p>For reference, here are the current definitions of these tags:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/career" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;career&#39;" rel="tag">career</a>: Career is a person's "course or progress through life (or a distinct portion of life)". Questions related to academic career comes under this tag.</li> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/career-path" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;career-path&#39;" rel="tag">career-path</a>: Queries related to progression of academics in various capacities from a student to a professor and the various stages involved in the process.</li> </ul> <p>The following should be considered as well: </p> <ul> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/job" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;job&#39;" rel="tag">job</a>: Refers to academic job, its advantages and disadvantages. Also related to duties and responsibilities associated with an academic job and academic job search.</li> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/jobs" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;jobs&#39;" rel="tag">jobs</a>: (no summary)</li> </ul>
[ { "answer_id": 246, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p><a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/job\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagg...
2012/10/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/245", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/344/" ]
258
<p>As a community, where do we want to draw the line between editing old off-topic closed questions and changing them completely? This <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1525/how-do-you-avoid-favoritism-and-personal-relationships-from-affecting-grading">recently edited question</a> has received many comments (well, a few comments with many upvotes) that the edit was over the top. I think I do agree, because while the theme of the question is the same, the question has completely changed (and not only by being more constructive). In particular, the answers given (and upvoted) already some months ago are now completely irrelevant to the question.</p> <p>So, what do you think should happen to this sort of questions? (meaning: questions closed, with existing non-trivial answers, who cannot be salvaged by minor edit or simple removal of subjectivity)</p> <ol> <li>No edit, delete</li> <li>No edit, delete, ask the improved question as a new question</li> <li>Invasive edit, delete all answers (and all comments, which was actually done)</li> </ol> <p>In my opinion, option #2 has the best benefits: it increases the value for our site by adding a good question, and does not create an unclear situation with mismatched question/answers/comments. Also, it properly attributes the good question to its rightful author (though it probably is a minor point).</p>
[ { "answer_id": 259, "author": "JRN", "author_id": 64, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>For the question involved, the question was changed, the comments were deleted because they \"were no longer relevant,...
2012/10/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/258", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
262
<p>Along the lines of "<a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/178/third-excellent-on-area-51-congratulations-to-all-nearly-ready-for-graduat">Third excellent..."</a>, we now have <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia">no more "needs work" categories</a>, having just bumped over the 5 questions/day mark. This is more of an announcement than a question, so it can be removed later if necessary.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 263, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Thanks for posting, good job to everyone who's participated and made this site as good as it is.</p>\n" }, { ...
2012/10/28
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/262", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/346/" ]
270
<p>What all we know, we (i.e. academia.SE) are hacking the system for objective verifiable Q&amp;A for the purpose of advise questions. (And, IMHO, we have hacked it successfully).</p> <p>However, I have some doubts when it comes to accepting answers. On StackOverflow it's obvious if an answer solves your problem. Then, out of such, you can choose the approach you actually took.</p> <p>For soft-questions you don't have "I copied and pasted your code, it works, thanks". Usually there are piece of advice and wisdom in many "answers". And none of it "solves" the problem (actually differences in opinions are often fruitful and show academic landscape).</p> <p>Of course sometimes there is an answer which is worth to be singled out among other. But in other cases, <strong>when there are more compelling answers - what to do?</strong></p>
[ { "answer_id": 271, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": -1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>If there is no clear right answer possible, then the question doesn't belong on the site. It should be closed as...
2012/11/10
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/270", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
273
<p>Informally watching our stats on Area 51 leads me to the conclusion that our number of users and visits per day have increased faster than our questions per day. We use to be averaging a question per 100 visits and now we are averaging a question per 200 visits. I am concerned that we do not have enough questions to keep the interest of our new visitors. Should we as frequent users ask some general interest questions, by which I mean questions we had earlier in our careers and now know the answers to, to try and keep interest/visits high. Hopefully more questions would encourage new users to ask more questions.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 274, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Before we jump to conclusions, do we have statistics about the rate of question generation on \"graduated\" sites...
2012/11/10
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/273", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
283
<p>Moderators have a view of the site's statistics, but they cannot share the specifics. So, I'm starting this post to keep track of the evolution of our statistics over time. Please feel free to update it every now and then:</p> <p><b></p> <pre><code> Date Qs/day Visits/day A. ratio Total users Avid users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012-07-04 4.6 448 2012-10-04 4.0 700 2012-11-12 4.0 994 2.5 1986 2012-11-19     3.7       1005            2.6          2048 184 2012-11-28 5.2 1068 2.6 2123 190 2012-12-03 5.7 1068 2.6 2154 192 2012-12-10 3.9 1093 2.6 2194 195 2012-12-17 4.4 1109 2.5 2275 200 2013-01-01     3.1       765            2.6          2361           207 2013-01-07     3.5       772            2.6          2402           209 2013-01-14     4.9       1056            2.6          2471           212 2013-01-21     6.1       1308            2.6          2549           216 2013-01-28 6.0 1392 2.6 2640 222 2013-02-04 6.1 1397 2.7 2786 235 2013-02-11 6.1 1452 2.7 2835 237 2013-02-18     5.5       1312            2.7          2903           240 2013-02-25 4.5 1361 2.7 2978 244 2013-03-04 4.9 1449 2.7 3101 248 2013-03-11 6.2 1533 2.7 3173 254 2013-03-18 6.5 1557 2.7 3240 262 2013-03-26     5.8       1653            2.7          3324           271 2013-04-02 5.0 1651 2.7 3486 283 2013-04-08 5.7 1621 2.7 3545 288 2013-04-15 6.0 1572 2.7 3612 292 2013-04-22 6.6 1497 2.7 3684 293 2013-04-29 6.9 1485 2.7 3749 296 2013-05-14 4.5 1458 2.7 3861 303 2013-06-10 5.7 2008 2.7 4142 318 2013-06-18 4.6 2008 2.7 4198 322 2013-07-15 5.4 2139 2.7 4465 329 2013-07-29 6.8 2392 2.7 4656 339 2013-08-19 6.6 2503 2.7 4914 351 2013-08-26 7.1 2739 2.7 5049 356 2013-09-09 7.0 3127 2.7 5188 369 2013-09-17 7.6 3251 2.7 5279 372 2013-09-23 7.8 3256 2.7 5341 372 2013-09-30 6.9 3350 2.7 5414 390 2013-10-07 6.9 3568 2.6 5504 392 2013-10-14 7.4 3572 2.6 5595 401 2013-10-21 6.9 3863 2.6 5666 408 2013-10-28 6.1 3954 2.6 5754 411 2013-11-04 5.9 4229 2.6 5851 419 2013-11-12 6.5 4408 2.6 5951 425 2013-11-19 7.1 4711 2.6 6082 430 2013-11-25 7.9 4938 2.6 6180 438 2013-12-02 6.0 4452 2.6 6284 443 2014-01-10 9.5 3932 2.6 7118 473 2014-01-17 10.3 6332 2.6 7408 487 2014-01-24 9.3 6409 2.6 7603 493 2014-01-31 9.3 6264 2.6 7832 501 2014-02-07 10.9 7012 2.6 8109 507 2014-02-14 11.9 7351 2.6 8308 518 2014-03-14 10.9 8138 2.6 9418 565 </code></pre> <p></b></p> <p>I use the <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia">Area51</a> page as source for those stats.</p> <hr> <p>Graphs of the visits/day, number of users, and questions per day:</p> <p>       <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/Lk0aO.png" alt="enter image description here"></p> <p>And here's the Quantcast estimate of site traffic, with a sparkline for the last 6 months, mean number of visitors per month, and highest and lowest daily visitor count in the last 6 months:<br> <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/academia.stackexchange.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="http://widget.quantcast.com//user/widgetImage?domain=academia.stackexchange.com&amp;widget=10&amp;timeWidth=1&amp;daysOfData=180" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
[ { "answer_id": 430, "author": "F'x", "author_id": 2700, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I didn't want to make the post overlong, so I paste here the Mathematica code used to make the graphs from the raw...
2012/11/12
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/283", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
288
<p>I am currently in my grad program in CS, and I am interested in studying software engineering processes, project management, and metrics in a PhD program.</p> <p>Can I ask here or on the main Academia site which universities are currently focused on researching the areas in which I am interested? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 289, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>That's not really the point of Academia.SE. The goal of this board is to collect questions and advice on problems ...
2012/11/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/288", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/3871/" ]
299
<p>I have noticed a lot of computer scientists, physics, and a few more subjects but I think there is a lack of people from a lot of other major fields, for example Biology.</p> <p>How do we attract people to contribute to the website from less computer-centric areas?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 300, "author": "gerrit", "author_id": 1033, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1033", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Maybe ore or more of the more creative ones among us could contact Jorge Cham (<a href=\"http://www.phdcomics.c...
2012/11/17
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/299", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/4050/" ]
301
<p>Currently, most of questions here are very general. It also reflects in upvotes per question (which is very, very high, compared to any other SE site I know.)</p> <p>It is good that we are able to produce high-quality content, appealing to a broad audience.</p> <p>But... maybe it means that we are too unforgiving for valuable, but localized, questions?</p> <p>Sure, some localized advice questions are hard to answer (because they are too subjective, or requires additional knowledge, or can't be answered with anything better that "check department website, and if it is not there - make a phone call"). But others may be valuable (even if only for a dozen of people).</p> <p>And more importantly, restricting ourselves to only broad may lead to an end.</p> <p>Related to: <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/273/why-arent-more-questions-being-asked">Why aren&#39;t more questions being asked?</a></p>
[ { "answer_id": 302, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This is a valuable comment. I think in general that field-specific questions could have some merit as questions.<...
2012/11/17
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/301", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
311
<p>I have recently acquired moderator privileges. Academia is the first SE site where I do so, so I was curious to see what they are like.</p> <p>One thing that struck me is how quickly some questions get deleted. For example, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5495/1033">this question</a> (only visible with moderator privileges) was asked Nov 27 at 22:50 and deleted Nov 28 at 13:36, e.g. less than 15 hours later. <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5494/1033">This question</a> was even deleted within an hour. The instructions in <em>Access to moderator tools</em> state that <em>You must wait for a question to be closed for 2 days before you can vote for deletion</em>. </p> <p>From previous experience elsewhere on the SE network, a user asking a question gets no notification if the question is deleted, and is unable to view the question or the comments. They will simply get error 404. With such a quick deletion, it's quite possible that the OP never got the chance to read the feedback and learn how to ask better questions.</p> <p>Would it be wise to wait a little longer before deleting questions? Personally, I think even 2 days is a bit quick. Closing is clear enough to signal "this is off-topic". Does it really hurt to leave the question for at least a week to give the OP opportunity to read and consider the feedback?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 312, "author": "F'x", "author_id": 2700, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Closed questions are broken windows: they give a bad first impression of the site to new users, and can (if in suf...
2012/12/03
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/311", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1033/" ]
320
<p>Is there any sense of when we'll be able to leave beta ? I've been watching the stats, and while the number of questions/day bounces around the magic 5.0 mark, all the other markers seem quite strong (and the number of visits/day is steadily increasing). </p>
[ { "answer_id": 321, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>A site graduates out of beta whenever The Powers That Be™ decide that the site is ready to graduate out of beta. <...
2012/12/20
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/320", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/346/" ]
323
<p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5879/any-suggestions-to-create-and-maintain-a-good-research-atmosphere" title="here">Here</a> I got a close vote. I have no issue with it <strong>but</strong> how can I know the intention behind closing voters. How to get their attention. Are voters required to explicitly justify their actions? </p> <p>Apparently, I see nothing off-topic or not constructive with its current shape. It discusses possible academic activities to encourage collaborations. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 324, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 5, "selected": true, "text": "<p>Close votes are anonymous by design. You can't specifically message the person who submitted the close vote and the...
2012/12/20
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/323", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/532/" ]
336
<p>(I don't know if it fits better to meta or nor meta.)</p> <p>As we see very often, many problems in/about academia are not suitable for close-ended questions. Also, some important things involve polling questions, like software, university, scholarship, conference or journal recommendations.</p> <p>(For example, I'm involved in projects about creating new software for new ways for collaboration and discovery sharing, <a href="https://gist.github.com/4540942" rel="nofollow">https://gist.github.com/4540942</a>, and I have a lot of related questions, but all of them are open-ended.)</p> <p>So:</p> <ul> <li>do we have a good place to redirect people asking such open-ended question?</li> <li>or: should we start one?</li> <li>or: maybe we should start a blog on Academia.SE?</li> </ul>
[ { "answer_id": 337, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Chat is as close as we've got to a place for open-ended discussion. But it sounds like wht you're after is a for...
2013/01/20
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
347
<p>Sometimes we get <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly">questions</a> which can be deemed too broad. Broad not precisely because the question is too general and thus would have many specific partial answers, or be subjective, but too broad because the answer is not simple - a book could be written about the topic. However, these could get asked frequently. <strong>Should we delete such questions, or keep them in order to at least explain in the answers specifically why the question is non-trivial?</strong></p> <p>This question is inspired by the discussion <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/215/which-of-these-posts-should-be-deleted/306#comment1481_306">we had here</a>.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 348, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>We should definitely <em>not</em> delete these questions. If this is truly the case, indicate as such in an answer...
2013/01/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/347", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1265/" ]
352
<p>I think we need to be nicer when closing questions. I think of new people look at having their question closed as being a slap in the face and a real turn off for the site. The automated messages are informative, but not that nice. I don't think they suggest welcoming edits to improve the question. We have had a couple of recent questions be closed/edited/reopened very quickly and I think that is a good thing.</p> <p>I think the last (generally the 5th unless you have mod powers) person who votes to close a question should post a "personal" comment. This should only get added when the question actually gets closed since the OP will not find out about close votes until the question is closed (unless they have enough rep, and then they presumably understand the process).</p> <p>I would propose something like:</p> <blockquote> <p>Your question was closed as a duplicate. A link is provided at the top of your question to the possible duplicate. If you don't think your question is really a duplicate, please edit your question to highlight the differences and then we can reopen it.</p> </blockquote> <p>Obviously something different would be needed for localized and not constructive questions.</p> <p>What do people think? Can we just change the automated text to be nicer?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 360, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think is an <em>excellent</em> idea. I find myself writing something like that very often (one example <a href=\...
2013/01/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/352", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
353
<p>I think we down vote too often here. SE has some reasonable guidelines about when to down vote.</p> <blockquote> <p>Use your downvotes whenever you encounter an egregiously sloppy, no-effort-expended post, or an answer that is clearly and perhaps dangerously incorrect.</p> </blockquote> <p>Our answers and questions often are a little on the subjective side, but nowhere in the guidelines does it suggest down voting just because you disagree (which I think is why many down votes get cast).</p> <p>I would really like to see more explanations as to why things are getting down voted. This would allow people to fix the problems instead of just slapping them in the face. I understand this will make the down vote not anonymous, but I think it is a nicer way to go.</p> <p>I see this as more of a problem when down voting answers. I can provide examples from my own answers which have received down votes. I am using my own answers since I can easily find ones with down votes and not because I need justification or want the down votes reversed.</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/6100/why-should-the-scientific-community-avoid-double-submissions/6102#6102">Why should the scientific community avoid double submissions?</a></p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5206/is-it-ethical-to-use-another-universitys-journal-subscription-if-yours-doesnt/5216#5216">Is it ethical to use another university&#39;s journal subscription if yours doesn&#39;t have access?</a></p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3163/what-are-the-various-designations-stages-in-the-academic-career-of-the-person/3197#3197">What are the various designations/stages in the academic career of the person</a></p> <p>I also have a question with what seems a spurious down vote:</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/3600/are-abstracts-confidential-during-the-review-process">Are abstracts confidential during the review process?</a></p> <p>Again, I am not complaining about these down votes, it is the fact that it happens to new people also.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 354, "author": "F'x", "author_id": 2700, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Okay, I first thought you were thinking about “heavily downvoted newcomer questions”. I asked for specific example...
2013/01/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/353", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
357
<p>We've got another <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7455/what-is-the-factor-that-made-us-higher-education-system-so-potent-and-popular">question with a background in humanities</a> which was closed almost immediately. Another such is discussed <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/347/should-we-delete-too-questions-which-have-too-extensive-answers-but-its-diffic">here</a>. The reason in both cases was that it's too subjective, rather argumentative and no objective answer could be provided. It seems to me this might be a pattern we need to be careful about. It seems to me that both questions and discussions around them implicitly assume that the question cannot be objectively answered. That however rules out any scientific discourse based on softer criteria. I argue that such questions should not be closed so quickly, there indeed might be good answers to them rooted in research in humanities, history, sociology, etc. </p> <p>Considering the discussion <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/299/how-do-we-attract-people-from-all-research-areas">here</a>, my feeling is that due to the current composition of academia.SE audience which is skewed towards people from exact scientific disciplines, we might be too dismissive about questions from humanities. This way, we won't succeed to attract people from those areas. We should rather find a way to embrace such softer questions.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 358, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>As somebody with a strong liberal arts background, I can sympathize that most of the questions here <em>do</em> c...
2013/01/25
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/357", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1265/" ]
362
<p>We currently have two separate tags for <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;publications&#39;" rel="tag">publications</a> and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/papers" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;papers&#39;" rel="tag">papers</a>. As far as I can tell, they're identical; both discuss research articles. I propose to merge them, but just in case I'm missing some nuance, I wanted to bring it up here first.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 363, "author": "F'x", "author_id": 2700, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I imagine that publications is broader than paper: a book chapter is a publication, it's not a paper. Probably, so...
2013/01/25
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/362", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
373
<p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7508/4227">This question</a> had certain comments by 2 users( JeffE , and scaaahu ) which although were not strictly on-topic, but nonetheless added to the discussion by providing a different viewpoint. Why were they removed ?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 374, "author": "410 gone", "author_id": 96, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Comments are ephemeral and disposable across most Stack Exchange sites (math.se and MathOverflow.se are notable e...
2013/01/28
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/373", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/4227/" ]
380
<p>I find that the <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/writing" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;writing&#39;" rel="tag">writing</a> and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scientific-writing" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;scientific-writing&#39;" rel="tag">scientific-writing</a> tags are used interchangeably in existing questions… <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/scientific-writing/synonyms">I suggest we make them synonyms</a>. Please give your opinion in answers, so the mods can make it happen if the community feels it's okay.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 381, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This is messy and I think there is a bigger question. At the most basic level, should the tag be <a href=\"htt...
2013/01/29
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/380", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
396
<p>I see a trend among some members to shoot down questions they <em>presumably</em> not have an straight-out answer for. I don't think this makes much sense. Nobody has answers to all thinkable questions, besides we don't all think (and express our thoughts) alike. Shooting down questions that you might not have an answer for prevents others who might actually have an answer (especially if the users "shooting-down" are high-rep users). </p> <p>I am a supporter of productive critique instead of destructive attitude and can imagine the above mentioned attitude hurting this site in the future. </p> <p>Am I the only person who feels this way? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 398, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Questions that are closed usually have run afoul of the FAQ's for the board. It's not a sign that there isn't a g...
2013/02/05
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/396", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5674/" ]
400
<p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7817/representing-experimental-data?noredirect=1">This question</a> about representation of experimental data was migrated to <a href="http://stats.stackexchange.com">CrossValidated</a>, the SE site for “statisticians, data miners and data analysis”. Below, I make the case that this question is actually a pretty good fit for our site, too, and that it should be reöpened. I welcome comments on this position, and would like to know the feeling of the community at large.</p> <hr> <p>First, let me state that there is no doubt that the question is on-topic on <a href="http://stats.stackexchange.com">CrossValidated</a>. However, I think it is not off-topic for Academia.SE. That case (a question on topic on two or more sites) happens from time to time (for example between Physics and Chemistry), and the SE policy for such a case is clear: the first step for migrating a question is “is it off-topic?”. If it's not, it stays, even if it might be a “better fit” for the <em>other</em> SE site.</p> <p>Now, is <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7817/representing-experimental-data?noredirect=1">that specific question</a> on-topic at Academia? Our FAQ says on-topic categories of questions include:</p> <blockquote> <ul> <li>Requirements and expectations of academicians</li> </ul> </blockquote> <p><strong>The question is <em>exactly</em> about the requirements and expectations of plotting data in an academic context.</strong> It's a common question for people to ask, an usually a topic about which people have not received formal training, even if great books exist (see: <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Tufte, E.R.</a>). So, in my opinion, it is both on-topic and of great interest. It's not a specialized data-analysis question (which <em>would</em> probably be off-topic), but rather a common question.</p> <p>I welcome other people's comments, in particular those of people who voted to close and migrate. I genuinely don't understand how this question was judged off-topic, so I'd be happy if you could explain it to me. In particular, <em>if it is judged off-topic</em>, how can it be modified to be on-topic? (I know it cannot be edited now that it's migrated, but it can be reäsked.)</p>
[ { "answer_id": 401, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>As the one who prompted the migration, I believe that the question was purely statistics. The only element that m...
2013/02/06
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/400", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
408
<p>Continuing with my push towards more liberal stance on deleting questions (we are developing here some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia" rel="nofollow noreferrer">deletionists vs. inclusionists</a> issues, I guess), let me ask the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>Suppose we've got a trivial, localised, or otherwise not-that-good question, but thanks to a slight shift in its interpretation and seeing through the question somebody provided quite valuable, even though only tangentially related answer. <strong>Should we delete such a question?</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>Before diving into the review of (currently 43! proposals to close), I would like to get an idea of the moderators'and the community's opinions whether my, openly inclusionist, stance has any merit and approval.</p> <p>I am referring to questions, such as these:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1417/distance-learning-vs-free-online-education">Distance Learning vs Free Online Education</a>, or</li> <li><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7338/funding-for-belgian-student-to-do-a-phd-in-uk">Funding for Belgian student to do a PhD in UK?</a></li> </ul> <p>In the first one, the answer by Charles is something worth to keep, and in the second one it's the rmounce's reply.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 409, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<blockquote>\n <p><a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1417/distance-learning-vs-free-online-educa...
2013/02/11
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/408", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1265/" ]
415
<p>I noticed <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7231/what-is-tvl-13-position">this question</a> which made me wonder what the policy here is regarding localized questions. There seems to have been a discussion of "too localized" questions based on research area specific questions, but only meta question regarding country specific questions is about whether or not US-specific questions are on-topic? </p> <p>Does the current state of the "rules" approve of country specific question, if so to what extend? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 416, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>As I said in a comment to <a href=\"https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/188/are-us-specific-ques...
2013/02/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/415", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5674/" ]
417
<p>I flagged a question as off-topic but it was declined, with the comment:</p> <blockquote> <p>declined - Please use the closing vote mechanism</p> </blockquote> <p>Close votes require 500 reputation, correct? Why would this be declined if I <strong>can't</strong> do that? What is the purpose of being able to vote as off-topic if I am not supposed to...?</p> <p>The question was: <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8209/i-and-my-advisor-have-a-crush-on-the-same-woman-what-should-i-do">I and my advisor have a crush on the same woman, what should I do?</a></p>
[ { "answer_id": 416, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>As I said in a comment to <a href=\"https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/188/are-us-specific-ques...
2013/03/07
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/417", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/746/" ]
423
<p>There is a lot of questions asking for life advice, e.g. describing a problem with their PhD advisor (or the head of the department). It's very common that there is a list of possible decisions and the asking person wants to pool what do people advise? </p> <p>On one hand side, they are not good questions in the SE sense - as they are subjective, mixing a lot of questions in one, and somewhat localized.</p> <p>On the other hand - very often they raise important problems, or <em>contain</em> questions that could be extracted.</p> <p>More than often such questions remain open.</p> <p>EDIT:</p> <p>My main point is not to set criteria for closing questions, but to ask what should we do is a question is "asking for a general life advice, given the described situation"?</p> <ul> <li>Close first, ask later?</li> <li>Suggest to focus on one topic or split into subquestions?</li> <li>Leave it as it is, because it captures important issues?</li> </ul> <p>Bear in mind that such question come mostly for people who are not yet familiar with SE, and may be not aware that open-ended subjective questions (and even worse - invitations to discussions) are not welcome here.</p> <p>But at the same time they might be eager to rephrase the question.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 424, "author": "gerrit", "author_id": 1033, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1033", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think an important aspect for such questions is: is the answer likely to ever help a 3rd party?\nFor example,...
2013/03/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/423", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
425
<p>Recently, someone posted the question "<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/8565/73">Fee surcharge for international students</a>", which was an undisguised rant. Someone mentioned this in the comments, and the user tacked on a question. To me, the question as added is likely off-topic here; it's a legal question about academia, not an academic question. However, the fact that the question was tacked on as such indicates to me that the user is looking more for discussion than an answer. I would vote to close, but my vote is automatically binding, so I wanted to see what the community thought. Do you think this question should be closed as "not a real question"?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 427, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>I agree that this as it stands this is not really a question. There might be one in there, but it is pretty bur...
2013/03/14
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73/" ]
438
<p>Let's get real here. Academics in mathematics ARE different from acedemics in medicine. We should embrace the real world ! </p> <p>This is not to prevent general questions.</p> <p>For example a general tag of tenure promotion could have multiple questions in different fields. Just like on StackOverflow questions about X-Path could be asked specifically to various languages (Java, C, Perl).</p>
[ { "answer_id": 439, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Academia in mathematics is not <em>always</em> different from academia in medicine. There are plenty of aspects ...
2013/03/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/438", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1537/" ]
443
<p>My understanding of the answers and votes on the <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/174/are-questions-on-software-on-topic">question whether software-related questions are on-topic</a> is that indeed, questions on software as tools for work in academia <strong>are on-topic</strong>. Now <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8578/how-to-physically-handle-hundreds-and-hundreds-of-papers/">this question</a> was closed recently. To my understanding, the question is about tools too. Perhaps it is on something many would regard as too lowly and dirty issue, but I think it's relevant to work people in academia perform. So I would like to finally see how to deal with questions regarding tools, be it software, hardware, or otherwise practical things making life of a teacher, or a researcher easier.</p> <p>P.S.<br/> As I expressed already elsewhere, I'd rather take an inclusive position regarding deleting question on this site. This should be a place to provide answers of whatever kind relevant to academia, rather than a list of FAQ for academics. Hence my question above.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 444, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>That question is well-phrased as an academic concern, and I agree with you that it's on topic here. </p>\n\n<p>To ...
2013/03/29
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/443", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1265/" ]
447
<p>I was reading <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9039/phd-at-a-low-ranked-university-leading-to-frustration">this post from the main site</a> and found myself confused why there are four votes to close. As my comment there says, I think the underlying question (though it could have been asked in a better way) is widely applicable. While the question is about a personal situation it seems to me a situation that many students may find themselves in.</p> <p>I saw <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/99/personal-advices-instead-of-general-questions-means-low-reusability">this meta question</a> and it is similar but I don't feel that other question really answers my question.</p> <p>My question remains, if a question is generalizable, then even if it is about a personal situation, shouldn't it be on-topic? Should we edit the question to make it more generalized?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 448, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The question as it stands is \"What should I do to make my life better?\". I can see how it is generalizable s...
2013/04/02
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/447", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2692/" ]
461
<p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9105/whats-the-best-researchers-could-do-for-their-native-country">This question</a> on what's the best researchers could do for their native country was closed. It reads like a sentimental question and may even lead to chatty answers, but doesn't it have some potential? I cut off the emotional and patriotic part and this question seems to ask for thoughts on how to transcend country-borders in academic collaboration. With a minor edit, shouldn't that be on-topic?</p> <p>Another grouse is with the answer: 1) it is fitting as a comment. 2) it does not answer the question. 3) it reads like a rant. Somehow the irrelevant answer has got 5 votes.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 462, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I agree with the the closing. The question is not really related to Academia; it's asking about how academics can ...
2013/04/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/461", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
463
<p>Over the last few days, we have had rapid closing votes on <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9039/how-to-deal-with-the-frustration-of-doing-phd-at-a-low-ranked-university">a question</a>, followed by reopening. Even in questions which are ostensibly off-topic, but not on careful thought (<a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9039/how-to-deal-with-the-frustration-of-doing-phd-at-a-low-ranked-university">example</a>), the closing votes have been dealt swiftly.</p> <p>For a site like ours with <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/16617/academia">4 excellent</a> grades and 1 Okay grade, is delaying the graduation out of beta harmful? More users with fewer points may have the privileges and there is the possibility of handling them without care.</p> <p>For now, we could appeal to all for sincere consideration before downvoting or closing. We would want to be welcoming to new users and their questions. We also do not want to shuttle back and forth between closing and reopening.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 464, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>To answer your question, no, I do not think so. The goal of any SE site is to increase the audience and hopefully ...
2013/04/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/463", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
467
<p>Welcome to the academia.SE Community Poll thread! (shamelessly stolen from <a href="https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1564/tex-community-polls">TeX.SX</a>)</p> <p>This thread is used for opinion and usage polls around Academia and academia.SE. The poll questions are added as "answers" to this "question". Their answers have been added as comments below them. To participate simply up-vote the comments which apply for you. If there is no suitable answer yet simply add it as comment by yourself. You can't up-vote your own comments but the comment author will be counted manually. Please do not add any other comments to these posts. General comments can be added to this "question". Rules</p> <h2>Rules</h2> <ul> <li>Community poll questions are placed as "answer" posts below. Feel free to add your own<sup>1</sup>.</li> <li>Answers to these poll questions are placed as "comments" below them. Because this is also an opinion poll subjective questions are welcome.<br> <sub>Please do not ask too specific questions and allow for multiple choices and votes, e.g. instead of something like "My absolute favorite for X is .." use something like "For X I often use ...".</sub></li> <li>To participate up-vote the comments which apply for you.</li> <li>If required add a new answer as a comment.<br> <sub>If applicable hyperlink the entry to allow other users to learn more about it. Feel free to flag comments for moderator attention if they should be modified for some valid reason (wrong/missing hyperlink, etc.)</sub></li> <li>Feel free to up-vote the poll questions ("answer" posts) as well to indicate that you liked the question. This will push the most favorite questions to the top.</li> <li>Do not post any other answer posts or comments. Please provide feedback and critic on the <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/468/discussion-about-academia-community-polls">corresponding discussion thread</a> instead.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Some things they learned over at TeX.SX</strong> </p> <ul> <li>Edits to polls after they started should not change the meaning</li> <li>Subjective topics are okay</li> <li>Yes/No question are okay</li> </ul> <p><sup>1</sup> Should you be affected by the "Trivial answer converted to comment" feature simply post a longer dummy text and then edit it down to the correct content.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 469, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Comments on this <a href=\"https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/437/929\">answer</a> made me curious on o...
2013/04/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/467", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
468
<p>Please discuss any ideas and issues about <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/467/academia-community-polls">Academia Community Polls</a> in this thread to keep it tidy.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 475, "author": "Ran G.", "author_id": 324, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/324", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Regarding the question \"Are you currently working in Academia (i.e., employed by a university with a primary dut...
2013/04/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/468", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
491
<p>In my opinion, <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/9604/5851">this question</a> and its answer <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/9606/5851">here</a> are inviting speculations, comments without proper backing of evidence, and argumentative discussion over an Institute being good or mediocre (again, based on the opinions of users and not facts). So...</p> <ol> <li>Does the community agree with me over these? If 'NO', then kindly point where I am wrong.<br> I don't have the reputation to vote-to-close, so someone else needs to, if required.</li> <li>In general, how should our community look upon such questions-answers which are inviting more opinions than facts. </li> </ol>
[ { "answer_id": 492, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": -1, "selected": true, "text": "<p>I disagree that the question and corresponding answer is argumentative, but I do agree that it is not a good quest...
2013/04/25
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/491", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5851/" ]
494
<p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/9667/958">Here</a> aeismail comments: </p> <blockquote> <p>One-line answers aren't allowed per our FAQ's. You should either expand your answer, or it'll have to be converted to a comment</p> </blockquote> <p>Is it true? I have skimmed through the FAQ, and it doesn't seem like there is such a restriction. Besides that, that answer looks ok to me - it's synthetic, to the point, and clear enough to stand as it is. Maybe we should rather change the FAQ? What is your opinion on this?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 495, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think that if one-liners are not explicitly forbidden in the FAQ, then we should forbid them explicitly. The o...
2013/04/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/494", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/958/" ]
500
<p>Currently questions closed as duplicate are what I will refer to as singly linked. A link appears on top of the closed duplicate question pointing to the original question. Nothing is added to the original question. Sometimes the duplicate question has useful answers and comments. By definition, we marked it as duplicate because we think the question itself has useful terminology and wording that is helpful for future searches. </p> <p>I propose that whenever a question is closed as a duplicate, a link should be added to the original question pointing to the duplicates. This would only be viable if it was an automatic process and did not require any suer intervention beyond simply voting to close the question as a duplication. Obviously some question may have a lot of duplicates so this list would need to be dynamic, realizable, sortable, and possibly searchable. The idea would be to allow a new user to easily find all the knowledge on the site about the question.</p> <p>Maybe this is better for the main SO meta, but I haven't really thought about how this scales by a couple of orders of magnitude.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 501, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>My first thought is \"that sounds like a lot of work\".</p>\n\n<p>My second thought is, \"what's the point?\" The ...
2013/04/29
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/500", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
503
<p>The question <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9794/importance-of-going-to-university-in-the-21st-century">https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9794/importance-of-going-to-university-in-the-21st-century</a> was closed on the main site, and identified as non-constructive, although it has received 5 different answers. </p> <p>How could this question be changed to be more constructive? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 504, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>If you're looking for an alternative location for discussion, there are a number of places you can try:</p>\n\n<ul...
2013/05/03
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/503", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/6989/" ]
509
<p>This <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9818/international-variations-in-addressing-academics">question </a> essentially asks: In my country we do things like X, how do they do them in your country. That seems like the definition of a big list question to me. I have wanted to ask a similar type question, and I asked for input in <a href="http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9145020#9145020">chat</a>. </p> <p>To me it seems that these "country poll" questions are not a good fit for academia.se.</p> <p>Do you think we should keep these type of questions open?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 510, "author": "Ben Norris", "author_id": 924, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/924", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This <a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2467/what-does-first-authorship-really-mean\">que...
2013/05/05
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/509", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
513
<p>The new display at the bottom is not very good, in my opinion: I would expect to see "Academia" under "Professional," but that's not even in one of the categories shown in the display below—you have to click through to get to a site where you then have to hunt around to find it. That's not a very good system in my opinion.</p> <p>But, at the very least, we should list Academia where it makes more sense. But is that "Professional" rather than "Life/Arts?"</p>
[ { "answer_id": 514, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It looks like the full list of categories are:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Technology</li>\n<li>Culture/Recreation</li>\n...
2013/05/12
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/513", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53/" ]
517
<p>There is an abundance of questions relating to Computer Science, which is great.</p> <p>However, when a question is discipline-dependent, IMHO it is crucial to advertise this fact in the title (unless it's otherwise clear) AND in tags (in this case: <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/computer-science" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;computer-science&#39;" rel="tag">computer-science</a>).</p> <p>Otherwise many questions and answers for things like publishing and conferences are misleading, as (in some cases) practices vary among disciplines (and in some cases, e.g. publishing=conferences, CS is rather an exception than a typical example).</p> <p>Do you agree with it? Or do you propose an alternative approach to this issue?</p> <p>(That said, I think that discipline-dependent questions are important.)</p>
[ { "answer_id": 514, "author": "StrongBad", "author_id": 929, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It looks like the full list of categories are:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Technology</li>\n<li>Culture/Recreation</li>\n...
2013/05/15
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/517", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/49/" ]
524
<p>There has been several questions recently about tags, and topic related tags in particular. I was wondering: <strong>how do you use tags? Why do we care about them?</strong></p> <p>Personally, I don't use them at all, I only search for questions through the search bar. It would therefore be helpful to see what kind of usages the community has for tags. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 525, "author": "posdef", "author_id": 5674, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5674", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think the usefulness of tags varies across different SE sites. Besides StackOverflow and Academia, I am activ...
2013/05/21
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/524", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
532
<p>I noticed that there are quite a few users with questions that are little open-ended, which is not a good fit for the Q/A format that we have on SE sites. I suppose a lot of us, grad students, would like to have a medium of communication where we can <em>discuss</em> matters and questions about previous experiences of the more senior members of AC.SE.</p> <p>The chat room is a good fit for this purpose, however it appears as there isn't much activity there. For instance just before writing this meta question the last entry on chat room was from 6 days ago. So here comes my suggestion/proposal:</p> <ol> <li>We hold regular discussion groups on the chat; for instance once a week or every second week ...</li> <li>... where the subject to be discussed is voted here on meta</li> </ol> <p>I am not sure if there has been anything like this before, here on AC.SE. CrossValidated has journal clubs with article discussions on the chat, a concept which I find pretty cool despite my lack of interest in statistics :) </p> <p>What do you think? Is this a desirable or sustainable </p>
[ { "answer_id": 533, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I think this is an interesting idea. However, I'm pretty sure that this is something that would need to be commun...
2013/05/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/532", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5674/" ]
534
<p>I accidentally noted that <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10247/why-are-cs-researchers-reluctant-to-share-code-and-what-techniques-can-i-use-to">a particular question</a> does not appear on the list of questions when I am not signed in. The question comes up in the top five once I am logged in. Why is this so? </p> <p>Is it a bug in the feature?</p> <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/1HmhW.png" alt="List_questions"></p>
[ { "answer_id": 535, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The ordering of questions when unlogged seems to be quite different from that observed when logged in. I can obs...
2013/05/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/534", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/411/" ]
541
<p>We all love <a href="http://academia.stackexchange.com">Academia Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p> <p>The <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. Run a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p> <p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>
[ { "answer_id": 542, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I am a relative newcomer (and seemingly a chatty one at that), I have found that this site is very welcoming and...
2013/06/05
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/541", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
544
<p>Given that the consensus here has become "undergraduate questions are off-topic unless relating to graduate admissions", we need to support the proposed Undergraduates.SE so that these questions have a place to go.</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/49571/undergraduates">Undergraduates SE</a></p> </blockquote>
[ { "answer_id": 545, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The observation that \"Undergraduate questions are off-topic here\" does not lead to the conclusion that \"We need...
2013/06/09
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/544", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/924/" ]
551
<p>There's only been one such question so far, but, depending on weather this question is accepted as a good one or not, it could set up future standards for the site, so I feel it is important:</p> <p><a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10735/en-shs-comment-participer-a-la-grande-conversation-scientifique-sans-renoncer-a">https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10735/en-shs-comment-participer-a-la-grande-conversation-scientifique-sans-renoncer-a</a></p> <p>There is a small part of the question in English, which actually sounds partially interesting to me. But then, there's a <em>big chunk of French!</em></p> <p>I sometimes come to this site to read up on life in Academia and inform myself about how things work where I'm not. I do participate a little, but much, much more, I <em>read the questions and answers that seem interesting</em>.</p> <p>Seeing this question, I couldn't help but feel just a little bit disappointed. There's this question, that might be nice, but I'm missing half of it. Seeing what Google Translate does to it just makes it more disappointing.</p> <p>And then, there's this two interesting <em>answers</em>, on which <em>I do not want to vote</em>, because <em>I do not know if they are relevant</em>.</p> <p>As it could determine a future standard (accept or not questions in other languages), I think it is important that there's an discussion within the community.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 552, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 5, "selected": true, "text": "<p>This question has been <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/non-english-question-policy/\">answered by J...
2013/06/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/551", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/4249/" ]
553
<p>In many fields (traditionally, Medicine but also increasingly the social sciences), applying for IRB approval is an integral part of being an academic. Are such questions on topic, and if so under what parameters (e.g. focusing on standard procedures vs. slippery ethical questions)?</p> <p>The IRB has been the subject of <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/10466/775">an answer to a question</a>, but not yet a question.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 552, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 5, "selected": true, "text": "<p>This question has been <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/non-english-question-policy/\">answered by J...
2013/06/27
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/553", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/775/" ]
561
<p>Recently, the question <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10928/how-often-should-one-evaluate-a-plan-for-an-academic-career?noredirect=1#comment20098_10928">How often should one evaluate a plan for an academic career?</a> has been closed without a single comment explaining why it should be closed, while there was already an upvoted answer. </p> <p>I decided to reopen the question, because the next logical step is to delete the question, and I have no idea why it should be the case, and it's likely we're stuck with an "on hold/closed" question. As I already stated <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/455/the-more-comments-the-better">here</a>, comments are very helpful to maintain the site, especially that we are still on beta, and that we don't exactly have hundreds of questions each day. Helping a new user understanding why his/her question is too broad or off-topic is important to help the community grow. </p> <p>To be clear: I'm not saying that this question should necessarily be kept open or should be closed, but if you know why you're closing the question, then leaving a comment should not be that difficult, and if you don't know why you're closing the question, then perhaps you should not be voting to close in the first place. </p>
[ { "answer_id": 562, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Expecting users to offer justification for why they're closing questions is part of the spirit, if not the letter...
2013/07/04
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/561", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
563
<p>About this question: <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10959/96">https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10959/96</a> Which asks:</p> <blockquote> <p>I'm hoping to enroll onto a PhD program. I've heard that twitter might help me find a PhD program. This question is inspired by this video in the British Ecological Society Careers YouTube channel: <a href="http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=plcp&amp;v=J9uEYEcCcFY" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=plcp&amp;v=J9uEYEcCcFY</a> I have not used twitter before. How can I use twitter to help find a PhD? For example, is there a particular group/channel on twitter that advertises PhDs?</p> </blockquote> <p>And the OP also commented:</p> <blockquote> <p>I've Googled virtually daily for the past two years without success</p> </blockquote> <p>This just seems a terrible question to me. But I see no close votes, and when I look through the close menu, I'm not sure I see anything that really fits.</p> <p>But do we really want this and questions like it?</p> <p>Is this question's continued existence, evidence that we are we missing a close reason? And if so, what is that reason?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 565, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This is a tough situation. It's an on-topic question, so it shouldn't be closed as a violation of the FAQs, regar...
2013/07/06
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/563", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/96/" ]
572
<p>This is quite discouraging. Why was my answer to <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11165/how-to-respond-to-someone-plagiarizing-my-work/11173#11173">this thread</a> deleted?</p> <p>It says converted to comment, but I do not see it anywhere. This is the 2nd time (according to my reputation record) that an answer of mine has been removed in a week (and I am using the term in the aforementioned record 'removed'). </p> <p>I like to think that I am making some contribution to this site, but clearly this seems not to be the case.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 573, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I transformed your answer to a comment, because it didn't any new comment w.r.t. the other answers. Your answer ...
2013/07/16
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/572", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
577
<p>Why do I get a yellow “0 flag” alert on the top bar, on Academia, where I am not a moderator? It links to the “tools” page, where there is nothing for me to do:</p> <p>    <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/6fd7s.png" alt="enter image description here"></p> <p>Same situation exists on Meta:</p> <p>    <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/KNKe0.png" alt="enter image description here"></p> <p>It's weird to get an alert for “0 flags”, especially on a site where I am not moderator anyway… And it's stable, it's not a transient issue, it's been that way for a few minutes.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 578, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 0, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This might very well be just a glitch in the system—if there are no messages to be moderated, then nothing should...
2013/07/22
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/577", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700/" ]
581
<p>There is a lot of spam in the replies <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5170/what-systems-are-most-effective-for-monitoring-student-attendance">here</a>, the reply from Ian Pack is a blatant one as a quick search shows he works for the company that he is "recommending", I would not be surprised if more are spamming.</p> <p>Another one in the thread, David Foster, is the Training Manager of the company he is touting.</p> <p>I don't want to link to these spammers' websites.</p> <p>I did a search of the name, product and company and both cases are employees spamming their products.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 582, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>I'm not sure it is our responsibility to \"report them to their company bosses\". </p>\n\n<p>What you did was I ...
2013/07/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/581", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
584
<p>I wanted to either vote to close or flag <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11360/form-get-method-prints-viewstate-value-in-addressbar">https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11360/form-get-method-prints-viewstate-value-in-addressbar</a> as suitable for SO.SE, but I could only suggest it belongs on ac.meta.se (which it doesn't). If something belongs on another SE site how do I vote to close for that reason?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 585, "author": "F'x", "author_id": 2700, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/2700", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>It is quite counter-intuitive, but here is how it should be done:</p>\n\n<p>     <img src=\"https://i.stack.imgur....
2013/07/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/584", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
586
<p>Following on the question <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/415/4394">What's the policy regarding localized (read: country specific) questions?</a> and <a href="https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/188/4394">Are US-specific questions OK?</a> My own opinion is that country specific questions are fine. But, I think that even if the OP is asking about their home turf, there should be space to provide general answers. Since this site is inclusive I think the Q-A should be made general if there are general interest in the question as such. </p> <p>An example: the post <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/11336/4394">How much vacation time is typical during a PhD( in the United States)?</a> (the parenthesis indicates an addition edit to the original question indicates a problem. As indicated the post was a general question applicable everywhere although it was clear from the question body that US conditions were at the heart of the OP. The question was later edited to show its US identity. </p> <p>The edit now makes the question very narrow and opens up for questions about vacation in each and every country. This is really not constructive and what we want. On the other hand I can see that a non-country-specific question would open up for answers from each country, in other words wiki-type posts. However, when somebody looks for a question on vacation having the question, in my opinion unnecessarily, limited makes little sense. I think that providing a wide spread of answers to a more general question is the better way. I realize this is probably not easy to resolve but as I see it: <em>should we try to be very specific and excluding or try to be general and including in the these types of posts?</em> </p>
[ { "answer_id": 591, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 2, "selected": false, "text": "<p>To riff off of Einstein, \"SE questions should be as specific as possible, but no more specific!\" </p>\n\n<p>We ...
2013/07/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/586", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/4394/" ]
589
<p>When recently voting to close an off-topic undergraduate question, I saw this screen: <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/9LQzD.png" alt="enter image description here"> with the phrase:</p> <blockquote> <p>Questions about <strong>problems facing undergraduate students</strong> are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic">What topics can I ask about here?</a></p> </blockquote> <p>Note, however, that this description is absent from the linked help center page. Nor is it at <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask">What types of questions should I avoid asking?</a>. We do note that questions that are very specific to one person's situation are not likely to get very far, but we don't outright discourage questions specific to undergraduates. </p> <p>Some SE sites explicitly discourage certain off-topic questions. Mathematics has a detailed list: <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic">https://math.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic</a> </p> <p>Can we add a section like this to our help center? </p>
[ { "answer_id": 590, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": -1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>Note that the section you linked to on the Mathematics section is from their \"on-topic\" page, <a href=\"https:/...
2013/07/24
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/589", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/924/" ]
596
<p>I found <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11411/is-there-any-scientific-rigor-in-scientometry">this question</a> interesting so I took a few minutes to remove a variety of typos ("gouvernemental", etc.). </p> <p>I saved the edits, double-checked the question and closed the page.</p> <p>Later I come back to check responses for the question and the typos I had fixed have returned.</p> <p>Why?</p> <p>Did I waste my time editing the question?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 597, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 1, "selected": false, "text": "<p>The changes you made are <a href=\"https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11411/is-there-any-scientific-rigo...
2013/07/26
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/596", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/7746/" ]
600
<p>I am unable to understand the comments and the down-votes on <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/11470/5851">this question of mine</a>.<br> [The question is deleted now, original text reproduced below]</p> <blockquote> <p>I realize we do not have a definitive answer/guideline on the purpose of pre-print archives. I guess it will be useful for our users who are new to academia.<br> I would like to see details in terms of:<br> What is the purpose of archives for electronic pre-prints of scientific papers, such arXiv, vixra, SSRN etc.?<br> Why are they needed when conferences/journals already exist to publish papers?<br> Can a published work (i.e., post-print) also go to arXiv?<br> Will my paper accepted by arXiv count as a 'publication' for me? </p> </blockquote> <p>Is it such a bad idea, say, if we make it a community wiki with one pre-print/e-print service per answer? This is one way of improving it which strikes me. Can others point out the flaws and give inputs on improvement?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 601, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p><strong>EDIT:</strong> Since the original question has been deleted, the quoted text in my answer refers to the ...
2013/07/28
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/600", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/5851/" ]
603
<p>I understand that questions on AC.SE are going to be "softer" in nature than the programming questions typical of SO.SE, but I think our answers often are "softer" then needed. I often read answers and think "Citation Needed". Are we answering questions based on our personal experience when we could be providing answers based on well conducted research? Should we be up voting "easy" answers that we agree with when they are void of references?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 604, "author": "eykanal", "author_id": 73, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/73", "pm_score": 4, "selected": false, "text": "<p>This is a very difficult area for our forum, as most of the answers and advice dispensed here is not borne of thor...
2013/07/29
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/603", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/929/" ]
610
<p>There are several questions with with the words "high school" and teaching on academia. Can a public school teacher be considered an "academician"? I haven't found any other stackexchange site that is likely to allow for questions about teaching, much less at the secondary level. Has anyone found another site that allow such questions?</p>
[ { "answer_id": 611, "author": "Community", "author_id": -1, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/-1", "pm_score": 4, "selected": true, "text": "<p>Welcome to Academia.SE, this site is about those involved in higher education (postgrad, research etc). There is...
2013/08/10
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/6089/" ]
622
<p>I was under the impression that URL shortners were either discouraged or outright banned. I recently edited a question to replace a bit.ly link with a direct link, and that edit suggestion was rejected. What is the official policy of this site for URL shortners? Certainly there's no need for them.</p>
[ { "answer_id": 623, "author": "aeismail", "author_id": 53, "author_profile": "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/53", "pm_score": 3, "selected": false, "text": "<p>There is no official policy on shorteners, except that \"Let me google that for you\" links are banned. However, ...
2013/08/23
[ "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/622", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/898/" ]