 They cite incidents in which the Judiciary have become aware of Juror assumptions made in the absence of supporting evidence, the unidentified effect on Jurors of stereotyping, culture, gender, age, education etc., which can and have influenced their ability to make a decision from an objective stance.These arguments and debates are founded in legal and psychological practice and made by social scientists and legal practitioners,

The juror however has a very personal and different perspective.The role played by the juror is an extraordinary one which is distinctive with minimal resemblance to their 'normal daily experiences/activities'.