 While "Grupo Mexicano" is consistent with other Supreme Court jurisprudence in the matter of preliminary injunctions, there has been debate as to whether this decision should be reversed.At the state level, the New York Court of Appeals reached a similar conclusion to that of the Supreme Court in 2000, in "Credit Agricole v. Rossiyskiy".In place of "Mareva", US civil jurisprudence relies more on prejudgment writs of attachment, preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, which have a more limited scope of application.