 The historical evidence did not, as the dissent argues, support the conclusion that "the Establishment Clause categorically condemn[s] State programs directly aiding religious activity when that aid is part of a neutral program available to a wide array of beneficiaries".That Madison's advocacy of religious neutrality led the Court majority to its judgment of "Rosenberger v. University of Virginia".That, if the dissenting justices had their way, and the Establishment Clause required no government money to organized religion, then UVA could allow the "Wide Awake" editors to themselves print the magazine, but it could not pay for the student religious magazine's third-party printing costs.