 Throughout its opinion, the Court refers uniformly to "Wide Awake"'s Christian viewpoint or its religious perspective, and in distinguishing funding of "Wide Awake" from the funding of a church, the Court maintains that Wide Awake is not a religious institution, at least in the usual sense.The Court does not quote the magazine's adoption of Saint Paul's exhortation to awaken to the nearness of salvation, or any of its articles enjoining readers to accept Jesus Christ, or the religious verses, or the religious textual analyses, or the suggested prayers.And so, it is easy for the Court to lose sight of what the University students and the Court of Appeals found so obvious, and to blanch the patently and frankly evangelistic character of the magazine by unrevealing allusions to religious points of view.